Heroes & Villains, the Aston Villa fanzine

Heroes & Villains => Heroes Discussion => Topic started by: Rick_avfc on December 12, 2011, 09:15:56 AM

Title: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on December 12, 2011, 09:15:56 AM
Bobby has been linked to villa this morning.....your thoughts please?  I personally think he might be a decent signing for us.

http://tinyurl.com/cswdf75
Title: Re: Bobby Zamora to villa?
Post by: ROBBO on December 12, 2011, 09:21:18 AM
You are winding us up arn't you.
Title: Re: Bobby Zamora to villa?
Post by: Rick_avfc on December 12, 2011, 09:23:17 AM
Put it this way, he would make a better forward than Emile Heskey.  Its just another option up front.
Title: Re: Bobby Zamora to villa?
Post by: inside right on December 12, 2011, 09:30:43 AM
No ta Whats that song the Fulham lot sing to him about missing the target all the time a Dean Martin classic
Thats Amore ????
Title: Re: Bobby Zamora to villa?
Post by: KevinGage on December 12, 2011, 09:32:32 AM
Big Eck was keen when he was at SHA.  Hadn't they agreed a fee at one stage, but the player himself said no?

If he remains with us, it might be one he revisits.  Also have a feeling we might be one of the clubs in for Jelevic at Rangers.
Title: Re: Bobby Zamora to villa?
Post by: Chris Smith on December 12, 2011, 09:33:17 AM
He's much improved, holds tye ball up as well as anyone in the country. Decent touch, strong and scores a few. It was mentioned on Sunday Supplement yesterday that a lot of the players unhappy with Jol's methods and Zomorra wanted to go but I'm not sure AM would want another striker just now.
Title: Re: Bobby Zamora to villa?
Post by: Rudy Can't Fail on December 12, 2011, 09:37:15 AM
He'll be 31 in January, so my guess is a three and a half year contract on £60k a week at MON's Barcelona.
Title: Re: Bobby Zamora to villa?
Post by: Matt C on December 12, 2011, 09:50:16 AM
Zamora is alright, can't see a 30 year old striker on big wages being on our radar though.
Title: Re: Bobby Zamora to villa?
Post by: UK Redsox on December 12, 2011, 09:54:23 AM
What, you mean Benni McCarthy's not available ?
Title: Re: Bobby Zamora to villa?
Post by: PaulTheVillan on December 12, 2011, 10:12:20 AM
Is this the start of the January bullshit thread?

He's not a bad player really, he's improved as he's got older.

He fell out with Jol when at Spurs, so not surprised it's happened again.

He'll be off to QPR or the north east IMO.
Title: Re: Bobby Zamora to villa?
Post by: CJ on December 12, 2011, 10:21:47 AM
No ta Whats that song the Fulham lot sing to him about missing the target all the time a Dean Martin classic
Thats Amore ????

When you sit in row Z and the ball hits your head, that's Zamora
Title: Re: Bobby Zamora to villa?
Post by: JUAN PABLO on December 12, 2011, 10:48:28 AM
If he replaces Heskey , Id be up for it .   
Title: Re: Bobby Zamora to villa?
Post by: PaulWinch again on December 12, 2011, 10:49:39 AM
No too old and not very good and injury prone.
Title: Re: Bobby Zamora to villa?
Post by: Mazrim on December 12, 2011, 11:02:15 AM
Depends on the price. He's not a bad player at all but it depends on what it costs us.
Would I swap him for Heskey? Absolutely.
Title: Re: Bobby Zamora to villa?
Post by: The Left Side on December 12, 2011, 11:11:58 AM
I'd rather we gave Delfounso a run in the team that spend big money on BZ.
Title: Re: Bobby Zamora to villa?
Post by: N'ZMAV on December 12, 2011, 11:16:37 AM
Wrong side of 30, wages that we'd probably be best avoiding paying. Can't see a resale value. Decent player, but this isn't a good deal for Villa if it comes off.
Title: Re: Bobby Zamora to villa?
Post by: Rick_avfc on December 12, 2011, 11:18:04 AM
I'd rather we gave Delfounso a run in the team that spend big money on BZ.

I think BZ would be bought in as a target man to offer us something different upfront as, lets face it, heskey aint really good enough for that role!  As for the fonz, he cant be a target man as he is a different type of player.  I personally do not think Fonz is good enough anyway and will not get ahead of Gabby or Bent
Title: Re: Bobby Zamora to villa?
Post by: Shrek on December 12, 2011, 11:18:24 AM
Or Weimann
Title: Re: Bobby Zamora to villa?
Post by: Mazrim on December 12, 2011, 11:51:07 AM
I would like to see Fonz get a run of games to prove himself once and for all (or not) because he has the talent. No doubt in my mind.
I would rather see him come on than Heskey because he's a greater goal threat. Likewise Weimann.
Title: Re: Bobby Zamora to villa?
Post by: JUAN PABLO on December 12, 2011, 11:52:25 AM
I like Fonz to get a run out but it just seems it aint going to happen.
Title: Re: Bobby Zamora to villa?
Post by: Rick_avfc on December 12, 2011, 11:56:39 AM
I'd prefer to see Wiemann ahead of the Fonz.
Title: Re: Bobby Zamora to villa?
Post by: TheSandman on December 12, 2011, 12:01:57 PM
With the financial constraints in place at the club it will only make sense if the fee and wages were very reasonable.
Title: Re: Bobby Zamora to villa?
Post by: Mister E on December 12, 2011, 12:55:52 PM
Heskey should get moved on; Fonz may well get moved on - and we'll miss neither in many respects.
I'd like to see Weimann get the shout as third-choice and go with Gabby and Bent for this season; take stock in the Summer.
Title: Re: Bobby Zamora to villa?
Post by: Rick_avfc on December 12, 2011, 12:58:28 PM
I think the Fonz needs to be loaned to a Premiership club so he can play at this level week in week out but I cant see any team that would take him.  Loaning him to the championship at this stage is pointless as he has been there before.  Look at what it did for Cleverly & Wellbeck.  Both had excellent loan spells.
Title: Re: Bobby Zamora to villa?
Post by: montague on December 12, 2011, 01:04:45 PM
I think the Fonz needs to be loaned to a Premiership club so he can play at this level week in week out but I cant see any team that would take him.  Loaning him to the championship at this stage is pointless as he has been there before.  Look at what it did for Cleverly & Wellbeck.  Both had excellent loan spells.

I personally dont think he is good enough for the Premiership so hard to see who would take him.
Title: Re: Bobby Zamora to villa?
Post by: WA Villan on December 12, 2011, 01:09:09 PM
I'd rather we gave Delfounso a run in the team that spend big money on BZ.
Agree with this, Fonz is making a career of doing nothing at the moment.
Title: Re: Bobby Zamora to villa?
Post by: garyshawsknee on December 12, 2011, 01:10:03 PM
It's probably paper bs,wouldn't want him as he'd push the youngsters down the pecking order. He's a rich man's Harewood,he's found his level at Fulham.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Shrek on December 12, 2011, 01:12:11 PM
I think the Fonz needs to be loaned to a Premiership club so he can play at this level week in week out but I cant see any team that would take him.  Loaning him to the championship at this stage is pointless as he has been there before.  Look at what it did for Cleverly & Wellbeck.  Both had excellent loan spells.

We are all forgetting, that we are not a top club 6 anymore, we are competing with the whole bottom half of the table.


Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithesShin on December 12, 2011, 01:48:35 PM
An ok player, but has long spells where he either can't hit a cows arse with a banjo or is injured. He's 31 in a month, on a reported 50K a week and has 2.5 years left on his contract so would probably cost a reasonable fee as well. As such it's a resounding no for me.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on December 12, 2011, 02:04:15 PM
An ok player, but has long spells where he either can't hit a cows arse with a banjo or is injured. He's 31 in a month, on a reported 50K a week and has 2.5 years left on his contract so would probably cost a reasonable fee as well. As such it's a resounding no for me.

That's the thing - take away the evaluation of him as a player for a minute and it just screams 'Heskey' to me in terms of age and cost.  Can't see Randy getting burned that way for a 2nd time.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on December 12, 2011, 02:08:14 PM
Yes, we can do better. Or at least smarter.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulTheVillan on December 12, 2011, 02:12:24 PM
Loan Delfouneso out to the Blues or a similar shitty championship club.

Hopefully the board will be looking to offload more of the over paid shit this january, like Ireland & Heskey.

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on December 12, 2011, 02:19:21 PM
Put it this way, he would make a better forward than Emile Heskey.  Its just another option up front.

Why, though?

Our problem isn't the players we have up front, and we have Weimann and Delfouneso as options.

Our problem is getting the ball to the strikers in the first place. Zamora will be looking at his last decent deal at his age, and will want good money. We just don't need him, I can't see us allocating wage resource there.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on December 12, 2011, 02:26:34 PM
Put it this way, he would make a better forward than Emile Heskey.  Its just another option up front.

Why, though?

Our problem isn't the players we have up front, and we have Weimann and Delfouneso as options.

Our problem is getting the ball to the strikers in the first place. Zamora will be looking at his last decent deal at his age, and will want good money. We just don't need him, I can't see us allocating wage resource there.

Lets get real, we are no Arsenal, Man Utd, Chelsea etc where they can out pass a side and score.  Unfortunately, there will be times when we HAVE to play long ball.  Whether we like it or not, it will happen at Villa.  All i'm saying is that he would be decent as a different option should we have to switch to a long ball tactic.  Yes I along with 99% of people on here, dont like it but it will happen.  Zamora can offer more than Heskey in that position and can score more than him.  Fonz and Weimann cannot play that role nor can Bent or Gabby.  Fonz, in my opinion, is just not good enough at this level.  I would like to see Weimann used more especially against liverpool this weekend.
The story about Zamora is prob a lod of tosh but my thinking was around a different style of football should it be required.  Personally, if it he doesn't come to villa, I wont be losing any sleep over it.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Vanilla on December 12, 2011, 02:38:10 PM
Zamora is on £50,000 per week at Fulham. So either he has to take a pay cut if he wants to play, or he can fester in Fulham's reserves on his threadbare wages.

However, I don't see us paying a fee for him in January, and because of the Jenas situation we are only allowed one more loan deal for the rest of the season (well done Villa on that), so I don't think this will happen as I think the manager feels cover in midfield is of more importance. 
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on December 12, 2011, 02:42:46 PM
Yep, defo.  I think Midfield is the area he will strengthen.  I'd like to see another CM and another winger come in who can help supply Bent.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: bertlambshank on December 12, 2011, 02:44:51 PM
Didn't Sir GT II try to sign him when he was at Brighton?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Vanilla on December 12, 2011, 02:49:59 PM
Yep, defo.  I think Midfield is the area he will strengthen.  I'd like to see another CM and another winger come in who can help supply Bent.

The problem is, what's out there that we can afford. Also, according to the reports we have to offload at least one of the big wage earners before we can get someone else in.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: BedsVillain on December 12, 2011, 02:50:40 PM
There are many better 'big/target man' options that would offer value for money and longeivity.

I'm hoping with McLeish's bold statement that he wants us to play like a dutch team, he's got Artur Numan lining up players ready for January.
My personal wishlist, if he is looking for a big man up top would be Bas Dost 6'5" with the Peter Crouch standard 'good feet for a big man'. Looks as exciting as Huntelaar was when he was 22. I know people will say it's only the Dutch league, but he really has looked quality for his 17 goals this season

But probably one of the most exciting prospects in the Erdivise at the moment is Luciano Narsingh, also at Heerenveen, very quick, tricky right winger already has 14 assists and 7 goals this season, only 21. Could be the Ashley Young replacement who giets Benty back on form.

Here's the obligatory youtube clips

 


Also this weekend Dost scored all five goals in Heerenveen's win over Excelsior, Narsingh had four assists and the other assist went to Oussama Assaidi who is a decent left winger too.

Excelsior 0 – Heerenveen 5 (http://www.101greatgoals.com/gvideos/excelsior-0-heerenveen-5-bas-dost-scores-five/)
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on December 12, 2011, 02:55:41 PM
Yep, defo.  I think Midfield is the area he will strengthen.  I'd like to see another CM and another winger come in who can help supply Bent.

Not sure about wingers - CNZ and Marc looked fine the weekend and Gabby will always still play wide at times.  But agree about a CM.  The good thing there is that should be be attacking we cna play Petrov deeper and if he's a DCM he can come in for Herd and we can play Stan where he was on Saturday.  I'd prfer attacking, or at least box to box, though, which would then give us a good option for a 3 with Petrov, Herd and the new guy.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Steve kirk on December 12, 2011, 03:11:03 PM
I would rather try and prise Dempsey away from them, probably out of our reach, a clever player, I have always liked him.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on December 12, 2011, 03:27:26 PM
I would rather try and prise Dempsey away from them, probably out of our reach, a clever player, I have always liked him.

I think Dempsey is very underrated.  He seems to score some important goal for Fulham and think he would be a very useful addition.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SteveN on December 12, 2011, 04:09:31 PM
 No to Zamora, if players accross the channel are still out of bounds then I would rather we looked at players who are hungrier and younger - and within our budget.  Church at Reading and Rodriguez at Burnley com eto mind for forwards. 

But...it would be better if we could find out whther the Fonz and Weimann are going to make it by giving them more playing time.  Likewise midfield - play Gardner, oh..and defence play Clark.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: eastie on December 12, 2011, 04:10:25 PM
He's much improved, holds tye ball up as well as anyone in the country. Decent touch, strong and scores a few. It was mentioned on Sunday Supplement yesterday that a lot of the players unhappy with Jol's methods and Zomorra wanted to go but I'm not sure AM would want another striker just now.

Surely you are not suggesting he holds the ball up as well as rooney ? I doubt we could afford the sort of fee zamora would require but i would not be surprised to see steven davis back at villa in january, as part of a deal that may see cuellar go the opposite way and a fee to rangers on top.

I doubt we will see a great deal of transfer action next month although the likes of petrov and heskey may attract a gentleman in the wearside area.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on December 12, 2011, 04:11:38 PM
We need a centre mid above anything else. Although I'm hoping Gary Gardner will be the play we're looking for.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JJ-AV on December 12, 2011, 04:14:54 PM
Zamora is exactly the sort of signing I want us to keep away from. He'd cost about £6m and be on a massive wage, what's the point?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: UsualSuspect on December 12, 2011, 04:19:31 PM
Zamora is exactly the sort of signing I want us to keep away from. He'd cost about £6m and be on a massive wage, what's the point?

MON is keen, just his type of signing.

6 million quid, big wages and no resale value.

He's got Sunderland written all over him.

Thankfully
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on December 12, 2011, 04:21:55 PM
Zamora is exactly the sort of signing I want us to keep away from. He'd cost about £6m and be on a massive wage, what's the point?

Agreed, I think we need to cast our net a bit wider and get value for money.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on December 12, 2011, 04:23:56 PM
Moving away from Zamora for a min, has that Portugese player started on trail yet?  Djalo?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Steve R on December 12, 2011, 04:25:09 PM
Whatever we do need right now it is not yet another ageing journeyman at significant cost who will give variable mid-table service for a few years before departing for the square root of sod all by way of a fee.

Surely we should have learned something by now.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TaxDodger on December 12, 2011, 06:03:09 PM
I think I'd rather give Heskey another contract than sign Bobby fucking Zamora.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Shrek on December 12, 2011, 06:04:17 PM
Whatever we do need right now it is not yet another ageing journeyman at significant cost who will give variable mid-table service for a few years before departing for the square root of sod all by way of a fee.

Surely we should have learned something by now.

Your talking about Paul Faulkner and Randy Lerner.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rigadon on December 12, 2011, 06:07:40 PM
Oh joy.  Another 'do a job' player. 

Can we sign a younger, cheaper version with some potential to be a LOT better than Bobby Zamora.  He is the very essence of journey man.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JUAN PABLO on December 12, 2011, 06:11:08 PM
Whatever we do need right now it is not yet another ageing journeyman at significant cost who will give variable mid-table service for a few years before departing for the square root of sod all by way of a fee.

Surely we should have learned something by now.

Or pay the wages of an injury prone player who is owned by another club
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on December 12, 2011, 06:20:05 PM
aside from our move for Shay, I don't think we'll be signing an 30+ players. The club are down that path now and want to get rid of wasteful contracts or contracts tied to players past their prime. AM will allowed to spend on players that will give the club their best years plus a mandate of bringing through the kids. Clubs with money to burn might look at players who are at their prime right now. We'll be in the untapped potential or up and coming stars market for a good bit yet.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JJ-AV on December 12, 2011, 06:24:20 PM
I'd like us to look at Diame at Wigan and Hoilett at Blackburn.

Both of their contracts are expiring in the Summer, so they'd both be available in Jan you'd imagine. Although Spurs have supposedly already started the groundwork for Hoilett.

Hanley looks a prospect at Blackburn too.

Another bid for Johnson and/or Milner on loan too perhaps? Now Citeh are out of the Champs League the amount of games against top opposition with be limited for those pair, and they'll need alot of football before the Euros.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TheSandman on December 12, 2011, 06:49:54 PM
I'd go for Hoilet and Diame. If Blackburn are really in financial schtook I'd go for N'Zonzi before Diame though.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mister E on December 12, 2011, 06:58:49 PM
I don't see any players coming in; hopefully he'll offload some of the dross and give us a clear run at the close-season opportunities.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Villanation on December 12, 2011, 07:29:29 PM
If we are seriously looking at Zamora its for a definite reason, its one of maybe two possibilities, first being Bent is on his way, despite what was said by Faulkner recently about Bent going nowhere (in actual fact that probably means he's nailed on to go) it clearly isn't working for him at the club, he will have been with us for 1 season come January and I hate to imagine what his goal tally will be for that season.

The other reason could well be Gabby, personally I'm astonished that we have held onto him, you only have to look at our games this season and Gabby looks head and shoulders above everybody else on the park, I can't imagine he's going to replace Heskey with Zamora and I don't believe we are going to commit to the overhead of paying Bent, Gabby and Zamora all in the squad, not to mention Delfouneso, if Zamora is coming to Villa its in place of Gabby or Bent
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rigadon on December 12, 2011, 07:39:12 PM
Hmm, not sure I can agree Villanation.  There would be a riot of the club sold Gabby and the club would know this.  Can't see him wanting to leave either.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TheSandman on December 12, 2011, 07:44:10 PM
With the way Gabby feels about the club he'd probably be the one who starts the riot...
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Villanation on December 12, 2011, 07:46:40 PM
Hmm, not sure I can agree Villanation.  There would be a riot of the club sold Gabby and the club would know this.  Can't see him wanting to leave either.

Rigadon:

I absolutely agree and I would be first in the riot, but nothing would surprise me in football, that said, I'm not 100% convinced that Darren Bent is playing his legs of for Villa at the moment so it could well be him.

Its one of either though you would have no chance of attracting the likes of Zamora for a spot on the Bench when he's playing for an England place and the same applies for Gabby and Bent, so its either cobblers/rumour, or AM plans to play all 3 in the same side, can't see it, haven't we also been linked with Andy Johnson.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rigadon on December 12, 2011, 07:52:45 PM
Zamora's more like to end up at (Martin O Neill's) Sunderland I reckon. 

As for Bent, I'm probably in the minority and he's about as good as we're going to get in terms of a goal scorer, but I just can't get passionate about him.  Where would Bent go?  Top 4? No chance.  Already left Spurs.  Liverpool?  They're still pretending Andy Carroll is top drawer.  Newcastle?  Couldn't affrod him.  Unless he goes abroad I just don't see him leaving to go anywhere.


Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dante Lavelli on December 12, 2011, 08:08:47 PM
Big no from me. 

Personally I prefer us to play either a 433 or a 4231 in either case I do not think we need another striker.  Gabby has hardly ever played up front and after that (in no particular order) is Heskey, The Fonz and Weinmann.  Whilst I understand the theory of having "other options" I so not think we can afford what he'd cost in both wages and fee for a "just in case" scenario.  These squad fillers need to be produced from the youth system.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JJ-AV on December 12, 2011, 08:28:27 PM
No doubt that Clubs who's boards tend to bend the rules a bit more than ours will end up with Diame and Hoillett on the cheap in January or on frees in the Summer.

Can't see Gabby going, although there's no doubt O'Neill would love him again.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SoccerHQ on December 12, 2011, 08:54:22 PM
Holliet would still cost a fee, he's under 23 isn't he?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Steve kirk on December 12, 2011, 09:32:15 PM
Hi Guys, when I made my first post earlier I should have introduced myself, first game back in 1966/67 when we were on our way down was there during the fightback and as passionate now as back then. I love the H @ V fanzine both in hard copy and online, I have been reading your comments for many many years without registering so thought its long overdue that I put my toe in the water with you regulars.
It can get a bit feisty on here and some of the big beasts on here can be a bit scary so be gentle with me, anyway as I posted earlier forget Zamora and go for Dempsey, he has a bit of Tim Cahill about him and could give us something different .   
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Irish villain on December 12, 2011, 09:40:10 PM
If the question is Zamora, the answer has to be NO!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: The Left Side on December 12, 2011, 09:41:37 PM
Fat Fwank puts Chelsea 2-1 up with a penalty., oops sorry in wrong thread!

Mods delete if you want to!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulMcGrathsNo5Shirt on December 12, 2011, 09:42:30 PM
McLeish wants a central midfielder, one I think who is a box to box type goalscoring midfielder. He wants someone with Premiership experience.

Step forward Craig Gardner....

I can see it happening.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: spangley1812 on December 12, 2011, 09:42:50 PM
Clint Dempsey would be a very good signing much better than Zamora
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Shrek on December 12, 2011, 10:16:43 PM
McLeish wants a central midfielder, one I think who is a box to box type goalscoring midfielder. He wants someone with Premiership experience.

Step forward Craig Gardner....

I can see it happening.

Please tell me you got his first name wrong?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dante Lavelli on December 12, 2011, 10:37:29 PM
Dempsey is a good premiership player but, again like Zamora, we'd be paying pretty much his ceiling price to buy him.  If we had a very identifiable hole in our squad (e.g. Scott Parker in the Summer) then I can see the logic but otherwise I'd hope villa's objective in the transfer market is to buy players who's value will increase, not decline.

p.s. Welcome aboard Steve.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on December 12, 2011, 10:47:08 PM
Hi Guys, when I made my first post earlier I should have introduced myself, first game back in 1966/67 when we were on our way down was there during the fightback and as passionate now as back then. I love the H @ V fanzine both in hard copy and online, I have been reading your comments for many many years without registering so thought its long overdue that I put my toe in the water with you regulars.
It can get a bit feisty on here and some of the big beasts on here can be a bit scary so be gentle with me, anyway as I posted earlier forget Zamora and go for Dempsey, he has a bit of Tim Cahill about him and could give us something different .   

Welcome.

Don't worry about the other posters, we're all gigantic pussy cats really.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Steve kirk on December 12, 2011, 10:59:47 PM
Hi Paulie you are one of the big beasts I was talking about so many thanks for the nice welcome.   
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: dave.woodhall on December 12, 2011, 11:15:29 PM
Can we interest you in any quality unofficial merchandise?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on December 12, 2011, 11:58:45 PM
Hi Paulie you are one of the big beasts I was talking about so many thanks for the nice welcome.   

Blimey you two, get a room





Only kidding mate, welcome to the jungle
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 13, 2011, 12:04:51 AM
Zamora would be a shocking signing. Lerner should use his financial veto Cameron styleee if AM gets any ideas.


btw is "big beasts" newbie code for fat?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: timeoutbigbar on December 13, 2011, 12:20:37 AM
Dempsey is a cracking player.  Wouldn't touch Zamora though, extremely over rated.  Wouldn't mind looking at someone like Wes Hoolahan as an option for midfield though, or Faurlin from QPR if they start to fall away at any point.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Steve R on December 13, 2011, 01:52:05 AM
If we were to go for any Fulham player I'd take Dembele. I suspect he'd opt for a club more likely to deliver silverware though.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: VancouverLion on December 13, 2011, 02:32:56 AM
Id take Dembele too, cracking player. Zamora no thanks.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mister E on December 13, 2011, 07:56:57 AM
Steve Kirk? - no relation to James T? Nah, thought not. Welcome.
Big Beast? - well, in confessional mode, the EffDee of my name does stand for FD; Fat Dave. So maybe you worked that out?.

Darren Bent: in the ST magazine this week (A life in the Day) where he describes himself at a "great club", one of the "Big clubs". He gives all the indication of being very happy and settled. Just good PR? - maybe.

I just don't see a move like Zamora happening for a number of reasons.

Players out? - yes, probably. Players in? - unlikely.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on December 13, 2011, 09:53:07 AM
I think we need to play this market carefully if we're after a midfielder.  We won't be able to afford much, so an average to good signing might mean Gardner's development gets hampered.  So I say a loan signing for 6 months with an eye to Gary taking his place at the start of next season, after being eased in and around the first team squad once back from Coventry. 

When I think of AM getting Hleb for Small Heath I think that's exactly what we need right now.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JUAN PABLO on December 13, 2011, 10:31:29 AM
Dembele . no chance
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on December 13, 2011, 10:33:30 AM
£10 million for Zamora apparently(obviously purely press speculation). If we paid that we would be absolutely mental.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on December 13, 2011, 10:45:43 AM
£10 million for Zamora apparently(obviously purely press speculation). If we paid that we would be absolutely mental.

can't see this one happening and especially for that fee.  I think its all been made up by the press as AM was interested in taking him to the Sty few years back.  They seem to think that just because he wanted to sign a certain player for the noses that he would want the same at villa.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on December 13, 2011, 10:48:33 AM
£10m... yes of course. *owshty bowsh*
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on December 13, 2011, 11:04:04 AM
They seem to think that just because he wanted to sign a certain player for the noses that he would want the same at villa.

Charles N'Zogbia?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Risso on December 13, 2011, 11:05:18 AM
Hi Guys, when I made my first post earlier I should have introduced myself, first game back in 1966/67 when we were on our way down was there during the fightback and as passionate now as back then. I love the H @ V fanzine both in hard copy and online, I have been reading your comments for many many years without registering so thought its long overdue that I put my toe in the water with you regulars.
It can get a bit feisty on here and some of the big beasts on here can be a bit scary so be gentle with me, anyway as I posted earlier forget Zamora and go for Dempsey, he has a bit of Tim Cahill about him and could give us something different .   

Welcome Steve, hope you hang around and post a bit more.  I too like Dempsey but don't think he'd leave Fulham to join us, even if we were interested.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on December 13, 2011, 11:19:18 AM
They seem to think that just because he wanted to sign a certain player for the noses that he would want the same at villa.

Charles N'Zogbia?

OOPS! I forgot about him  :-[ lol!  Ok, I should have said that they think that EVERY player he wanted to take to blues, would mean he would want to bring them to Villa as well.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: mal on December 13, 2011, 11:28:23 AM
If we are seriously looking at Zamora its for a definite reason, its one of maybe two possibilities, first being Bent is on his way, despite what was said by Faulkner recently about Bent going nowhere (in actual fact that probably means he's nailed on to go) it clearly isn't working for him at the club, he will have been with us for 1 season come January and I hate to imagine what his goal tally will be for that season.

14 goals from 30 games compares favourably with everywhere else he's been
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on December 13, 2011, 11:30:41 AM
And factor in that he's missed a fair few sitter this season aswell!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: brontebilly on December 13, 2011, 11:41:38 AM
like everyone else  big no to zamora. the kind of deal that has us in the mess that we are. Plus with Gabby and Bent we dont need him.

I expect Zamora and Robbie Keane to be heading up to Sunderland in the next few weeks.

It really isnt looking too good for either the Fonz or Weimann at Villa Park. Even with Gabby or Bent out we are likely to play an attacking midfielder rather than another striker.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Bottom Right 89 on December 13, 2011, 12:33:05 PM
I think Zamora is very underated and would make the ideal strike partner for Bent. Something has to give our £20m man is lost at the moment needs someone to hold the ball and play him in and share the goals. Add Gabby as a third striker and this would scare the hell out of most premier league defences. Zamora also wants to make the England squad for the Summer so he'll be busting a gut to impress - if he passes the medical get him in.

Would like to think either Weimann or Fonz will make it but Fonz must be showing nothing in training or he'd be in the team by now, he's definitely got the talent.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulTheVillan on December 13, 2011, 12:58:13 PM
Hopefully MON will take Ireland to Sunderland. As much as I rated him under Hughes at City, I just can't see it working here now.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: UsualSuspect on December 13, 2011, 01:13:48 PM
I would like us to take a punt on a virtually unknown from South America.

If the club emailed Tim Vickery from World Soccer he would give them the names of 6 players who could do a job for us.

As a club we just seem so blinkered by signing PL players, why can't we have a go at unearthing some gems??
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on December 13, 2011, 02:12:54 PM
As a club we just seem so blinkered by signing PL players, why can't we have a go at unearthing some gems??

I personally believe that this would have happened if GH was still incharge
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulTheVillan on December 13, 2011, 02:14:17 PM
There are some good players in the lower leagues too. Look at Walters at Stoke. He's done very well since going there.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: avwebby on December 13, 2011, 02:44:02 PM
Like most would say no to BZ. Could look at Carlton Cole as the porn mongers in cheif need to lose some more players if we need a forward.

News on the Sky Sports grpevine is Joe Cole is looking to come back in the Summer.

Personally I think we need a CM too anyone with an attacking brain will do please
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on December 13, 2011, 02:52:24 PM
Like most would say no to BZ. Could look at Carlton Cole as the porn mongers in cheif need to lose some more players if we need a forward.

News on the Sky Sports grpevine is Joe Cole is looking to come back in the Summer.

Personally I think we need a CM too anyone with an attacking brain will do please

I'm probably in the minority here, but I wouldn't say no to Cole as a short term loan.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithesShin on December 13, 2011, 03:00:19 PM
Personally I wouldn't touch Cole with a barge pole. I'd rather stick with Weimann and Fonz as back up and spend the money in a position we really need it.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Matt C on December 13, 2011, 03:09:04 PM
Whatever happened to Mark Noble? Is he still at West Ham?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithesShin on December 13, 2011, 03:10:31 PM
Yep, played about 20 games for them so far this season.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: dave.woodhall on December 13, 2011, 03:23:38 PM
like everyone else  big no to zamora. the kind of deal that has us in the mess that we are. Plus with Gabby and Bent we dont need him.

I expect Zamora and Robbie Keane to be heading up to Sunderland in the next few weeks.

It really isnt looking too good for either the Fonz or Weimann at Villa Park. Even with Gabby or Bent out we are likely to play an attacking midfielder rather than another striker.

Weimann seems to be most-favoured of the young strikers. Didn't he have another injury after the one against Rapid last season?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on December 13, 2011, 03:26:41 PM
I think Weimann is match fit but just waiting for his chance.  I think he should be given a chance this weekend alongside Bent but I think it will be Heskey
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Aston Manor on December 13, 2011, 05:28:54 PM
I'd be quite happy to have Zamora. A definite upgrade on Heskey. A forward 'squad' of Bent, gabby, Zamora and one of the kids is decent enough. Maybe time to cash in - if we'd get any - on Delfouneso. He's becoming the Salifou or Osbourne of the bench. just there for the sake of it now.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: villa `cross the mersey on December 13, 2011, 05:36:59 PM
Like most would say no to BZ. Could look at Carlton Cole as the porn mongers in cheif need to lose some more players if we need a forward.

News on the Sky Sports grpevine is Joe Cole is looking to come back in the Summer.

Personally I think we need a CM too anyone with an attacking brain will do please

I'm probably in the minority here, but I wouldn't say no to Cole as a short term loan.

Nat King Cole preferably :)
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mister E on December 13, 2011, 05:50:08 PM
Like most would say no to BZ. Could look at Carlton Cole as the porn mongers in cheif need to lose some more players if we need a forward.

News on the Sky Sports grpevine is Joe Cole is looking to come back in the Summer.

Personally I think we need a CM too anyone with an attacking brain will do please

I'm probably in the minority here, but I wouldn't say no to Cole as a short term loan.

Nat King Cole preferably :)
Old King Cole before Joe and Carlton, please.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithesShin on December 13, 2011, 06:23:19 PM
Like most would say no to BZ. Could look at Carlton Cole as the porn mongers in cheif need to lose some more players if we need a forward.

News on the Sky Sports grpevine is Joe Cole is looking to come back in the Summer.

Personally I think we need a CM too anyone with an attacking brain will do please

I'm probably in the minority here, but I wouldn't say no to Cole as a short term loan.

Nat King Cole preferably :)
Old King Cole before Joe and Carlton, please.

I'd prefer that  Russian fella, Sackov Cole ahead of Carlton.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TonyD on December 13, 2011, 07:42:38 PM
Strikers is the last thing we should be looking at.  Gabby, Bent, Fonz and the Weimann chap are more than enough. 

Sell Heskey, Ireland, Beye and Collins.

Bring Clark into the team.

Buy 2 midfielder, a full back and central defender.

Reckon Cahill would come home?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 13, 2011, 08:04:42 PM
cahill look odds on for chelsea. Coyle didn't even deny it  in an interview a while back and they've stuck alex on the transfer list to make room. Unbelievable fuck up by the north-east messiah
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Steve kirk on December 13, 2011, 08:11:17 PM
Hoping to stick around this time and post more regular, I was on here originally under the name of Brian Godfrey but had many computer problems and sort of gave up and never returned till now, I think Jol could be tempted into taking Ireland in a deal for Dempsey or Zamora and we really need to get rid of Stephen, its a real shame because I thought he was the real deal, what a waste. 
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Bottom Right 89 on December 13, 2011, 08:17:04 PM
cahill look odds on for chelsea. Coyle didn't even deny it  in an interview a while back and they've stuck alex on the transfer list to make room. Unbelievable fuck up by the north-east messiah
Indeed who the hell sanctioned that sale, all this time and it still angers me. As we can no longer afford our former trainee maybe we could get Alex or Chris Samba instead.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rudy Can't Fail on December 13, 2011, 08:29:21 PM
Hi Paulie you are one of the big beasts I was talking about so many thanks for the nice welcome.   

Blimey you two, get a room

Since Paulie jumped into bed with Risso, expect a ménage à trois, Steve.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dave on December 13, 2011, 08:39:04 PM
I would like us to take a punt on a virtually unknown from South America.

If the club emailed Tim Vickery from World Soccer he would give them the names of 6 players who could do a job for us.
Great, but no 'unknown' from that area will ever get a work permit.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dave on December 13, 2011, 08:45:38 PM
cahill look odds on for chelsea. Coyle didn't even deny it  in an interview a while back and they've stuck alex on the transfer list to make room. Unbelievable fuck up by the north-east messiah
Indeed who the hell sanctioned that sale, all this time and it still angers me. As we can no longer afford our former trainee maybe we could get Alex or Chris Samba instead.
Just me then that thought Cahill looked a good deal worse on Saturday than either of the two we've currently got there?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: spangley1812 on December 13, 2011, 08:48:28 PM
cahill look odds on for chelsea. Coyle didn't even deny it  in an interview a while back and they've stuck alex on the transfer list to make room. Unbelievable fuck up by the north-east messiah
Indeed who the hell sanctioned that sale, all this time and it still angers me. As we can no longer afford our former trainee maybe we could get Alex or Chris Samba instead.
Just me then that thought Cahill looked a good deal worse on Saturday than either of the two we've currently got there?
I agree Dave he has been poor all season and had a shocker at Spurs (he didnt deserve to get sent off though), if he goes to Chelsea he will be on the bench anyway as AVB has stated that Luiz and Terry are his 1st choice pairig
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: KevinGage on December 13, 2011, 09:13:14 PM
Not that you should believe everything a football manager says in relation to transfers, but when AVB was asked about him last week he said 'good player, but not interested,'  or words to that effect.

But maybe the decision will be taken out of his hands.  Could be a Chief Execs signing, pick him up for a song and sell him on in 12 months if he doesn't make an impact.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: KevinGage on December 13, 2011, 09:16:26 PM
cahill look odds on for chelsea. Coyle didn't even deny it  in an interview a while back and they've stuck alex on the transfer list to make room. Unbelievable fuck up by the north-east messiah
Indeed who the hell sanctioned that sale, all this time and it still angers me. As we can no longer afford our former trainee maybe we could get Alex or Chris Samba instead.
Just me then that thought Cahill looked a good deal worse on Saturday than either of the two we've currently got there?

Whether it's nerves playing his ex club, or the (frankly suicidal) high line Bolton always play against our forwards, he nearly always looks ropey against us.

He must be doing something right in the other games to get the kind of attention he receives, but I must be honest and say I haven't seen it. During his time with us I liked him, and wanted to see him get more game time.  But he was far from impeccable then either.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on December 13, 2011, 09:18:29 PM
I still think it's that he rocks up with the occasional spectacular goal. So people think he's a footballing centre half.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dave on December 13, 2011, 09:20:04 PM
He must be doing something right in the other games to get the kind of attention he receives, but I must be honest and say I haven't seen it. During his time with us I liked him, and wanted to see him get more game time.  But he was far from impeccable then either.
That's pretty much where I am as well.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on December 13, 2011, 09:30:30 PM
I honestly dont think Cahill is all that convincing a defender.  Lots of promise but essentially lacking in vital areas.

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: luke25 on December 13, 2011, 09:33:46 PM
cahill look odds on for chelsea. Coyle didn't even deny it  in an interview a while back and they've stuck alex on the transfer list to make room. Unbelievable fuck up by the north-east messiah
Indeed who the hell sanctioned that sale, all this time and it still angers me. As we can no longer afford our former trainee maybe we could get Alex or Chris Samba instead.
Just me then that thought Cahill looked a good deal worse on Saturday than either of the two we've currently got there?

Whether it's nerves playing his ex club, or the (frankly suicidal) high line Bolton always play against our forwards, he nearly always looks ropey against us.

He must be doing something right in the other games to get the kind of attention he receives, but I must be honest and say I haven't seen it. During his time with us I liked him, and wanted to see him get more game time.  But he was far from impeccable then either.
I've said it a few times now but he's definately got a bit of the Joleon Lescott about him were by because he'll knock in a few goals a season he's all of a sudden rated higher, his positioning in the oppositions box is better than his positioning in his own box.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithesShin on December 13, 2011, 09:36:08 PM
I can't help but wonder if he wasn't the one that MON let get away and instead had spent his whole career playing for Bolton if there'd be such a love affair with him on here?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: KevinGage on December 13, 2011, 09:40:23 PM
I would probably prefer Lescott to him, TBH.

Lescott was part of a solid defence at Everton and now at Citeh and -as you say- weighs in with a few goals too.  During Laursen's stint with us, I think I'm right in saying that Lescott was the next prolific CB goals wise.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: spangley1812 on December 13, 2011, 09:48:39 PM
I can't help but wonder if he wasn't the one that MON let get away and instead had spent his whole career playing for Bolton if there'd be such a love affair with him on here?
The "love affair on here" is all down to the goal that he scored versus Blues, if he was as good as he thinks he is and some of the people on here then Fergie would have signed him instead of Phil Jones
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on December 13, 2011, 10:07:31 PM
I can see Fergie going for him in Jan with Vidic out and Ferdinand looking older every week.


I may be in a very small minority, but I would not be adverse to the gargoyle faced Gardner coming back. He gives bite, passion and goals from midfield, and could play well with Petrov and Herd. Heskey straight swap please!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on December 13, 2011, 10:37:49 PM
I can't help but wonder if he wasn't the one that MON let get away and instead had spent his whole career playing for Bolton if there'd be such a love affair with him on here?
The "love affair on here" is all down to the goal that he scored versus Blues, if he was as good as he thinks he is and some of the people on here then Fergie would have signed him instead of Phil Jones

Let's see where he's playing after January before we go down that route.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 13, 2011, 11:13:04 PM
yep. seems the england manager and  possibly the chelsea manager think he's ok. The only possible love affair is those who can't stand to admit MON made a gigantic boo-boo. As for the current pair in our defence well if they were any good don't you think  they'd be already gone to chelsea or similar given our "everything must go" policy, or in Dunne's case why did citeh sell him if he's better than Cahill?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithesShin on December 13, 2011, 11:22:38 PM
yep. seems the england manager and  possibly the chelsea manager think he's ok. The only possible love affair is those who can't stand to admit MON made a gigantic boo-boo. As for the current pair in our defence well if they were any good don't you think  they'd be already gone to chelsea or similar given our "everything must go" policy, or in Dunne's case why did citeh sell him if he's better than Cahill?

Or you could switch that and the love affair is down to those who use it as a stick to beat MON.
Don't get me wrong, I didn't want him to go at the time and i'd prefer him to Collins, but anyone would think he was the reincarnation of Bobby Moore the way some folks on here talk about him and yet nearly 4 years on he still plays for Bolton.

As for the fact he plays for England, funny how the England argument gets shot down whenever it's mentioned about Heskey.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 13, 2011, 11:28:41 PM
well i was laughed at on here when i said he would play for england. he has and done very well thank you. I still think given quality players around him he'll go on to replace terry in the england side. He's a leader and while he has defects to his game, he could walk into our central defence currently and most of the other defences.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JJ-AV on December 13, 2011, 11:33:20 PM
I'm happy with the forward options. Gabby is as good a forward as you'll find outside the top 6 and when Bent finds his form there isn't a better box-poacher in the country.

We'll only have an issue with upgrading on them if we ever get back to the relative heights of 2008/09

Djalo (if he impresses) is a positive move and Heskey has his uses until the end of the season. If Djalo doesn't impress we can look for a forward in the Summer. Klasnic?

Centre mid is our immediate issue. Which is why Diame stands out as he should be available in Jan.

Then get the wheels in motion for Hoilett/Sinclair/Jarvis/Johnson in the Summer.

The entire backline needs replacing though IMO. See how Clark does this season and ideally we'll only need three then. Hanley looks a prospect at Blackburn.

Formica looks decent at Blackburn too.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: eamonn on December 14, 2011, 12:11:42 AM
Hanley...that bemused-looking, ugly sod from Scotland? No thanks. Formica neither. If we're talking Blackburn then let Hoilett be our new Ashley please.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Percy McCarthy on December 14, 2011, 07:30:30 AM
Hoilett is ace.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on December 14, 2011, 07:39:29 AM
Hoilet would be a brilliant signing....


Spanish paper marca being reported as claiming we are interested in David Villa.  I wish.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ROBBO on December 14, 2011, 07:43:54 AM
Who would you rather have Cahill or Samba, Samba for me every time, brilliant in the air and is no hoofer. Scores a fair few too.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on December 14, 2011, 07:45:26 AM
Yeah Samba is brilliant. Another at the top of houlliers list......
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dave on December 14, 2011, 08:37:11 AM
yep. seems the england manager and  possibly the chelsea manager think he's ok. The only possible love affair is those who can't stand to admit MON made a gigantic boo-boo.
Would have been great to keep him when mental figures of £15m+ were being thrown around. He's certainly a decent defender and one who would be an asset, but in terms of bad decisions it was fairly inconsequential. Doesn't even compare to the Harewood and Heskey decisions in my opinion.

As for the England stuff, he's just about managed to replace Matthew Upson as third choice in a fairly mediocre list. That doesn't make him Franco Baresi.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: VillaSpen on December 14, 2011, 09:13:07 AM
Not entirely convinced our budget could stretch to it but I'd like to see Bassong and Snodgrass in.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on December 14, 2011, 09:17:53 AM
Hoilet would be a brilliant signing....


Spanish paper marca being reported as claiming we are interested in David Villa.  I wish.

That is a good one!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: LeeB on December 14, 2011, 09:40:43 AM
Not entirely convinced our budget could stretch to it but I'd like to see Bassong and Snodgrass in.

I'd be fucking horrified if our 'budget' was 'stretched' for those two.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on December 14, 2011, 09:48:15 AM
Hoilet would be a brilliant signing....


Spanish paper marca being reported as claiming we are interested in David Villa.  I wish.

Only if the Qatari royal family buyout rumour was true and probably not even then. Alas.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on December 14, 2011, 09:54:19 AM
Who would you rather have Cahill or Samba, Samba for me every time, brilliant in the air and is no hoofer. Scores a fair few too.

Thing is Samba does look good, but then so does Hoilett and N'Zonzi from their midfield, plus Yakubu knows where the net is in the PL.  Dann was also highly rated at SHA and has gone there.  So, if they do have this collection of good players, then why are they so awful?  If in the summer we were told Samba and Dann would be our new CB pairing, then we'd have been very happy - I know I would have been, anyway.

Just have a fear Samba is an average player made to look good in a rubbish team.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SoccerHQ on December 14, 2011, 10:01:06 AM
The reason I want Samba is he's a real warrior at the back, watched the first half of the game on Saturday and it seemed like he was heading away every single cross.

Another reason is Phil Jones came on a bundle alongside Samba so I'm hoping he would have the same effect on Clark.

Oh and we could send Collins up there.

BTW Shawcross is better than Cahill.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: jonzy85 on December 14, 2011, 10:14:53 AM
Cahill is one of the most overrated players in England in my opinion. The English press love their blood-and-thunder, courageous, lionheart centre-halves and Cahill falls into this mould. He certainly has qualities and as we all know is capable of scoring a few goals.

You just have to look at how poor Bolton have been defensively this year to see he isn't a top rate defender. Ok, the players around him aren't up to much, but you would expect him to shine even more if he was that good. He has shown little or no leadership in anything I have seen of Bolton and many of their goals conceded have come from balls being delivered into an area in the box where you would expect a commanding centre half to deal with it.

If one of the big teams comes in for him, it will be a panic buy. He will need protecting, in a way like Terry, who has often looked poor when he hasn't had a Makelele type (a good one, not Mikel) in front of him or Carvalho/Desailly beside him.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulTheVillan on December 14, 2011, 10:25:48 AM
Cahill is one of the most overrated players in England in my opinion. The English press love their blood-and-thunder, courageous, lionheart centre-halves and Cahill falls into this mould. He certainly has qualities and as we all know is capable of scoring a few goals.

You just have to look at how poor Bolton have been defensively this year to see he isn't a top rate defender. Ok, the players around him aren't up to much, but you would expect him to shine even more if he was that good. He has shown little or no leadership in anything I have seen of Bolton and many of their goals conceded have come from balls being delivered into an area in the box where you would expect a commanding centre half to deal with it.

If one of the big teams comes in for him, it will be a panic buy. He will need protecting, in a way like Terry, who has often looked poor when he hasn't had a Makelele type (a good one, not Mikel) in front of him or Carvalho/Desailly beside him.

Totally agree. Over the past seasons all of the 'big teams' have needed centre backs. Yet none of them have touched Cahill.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Ryu on December 14, 2011, 10:27:09 AM
I agree with those saying cahill is overrated. Not as good as Smalling, Jones or Jagielka, if you ask me.

Back to transfer speculation I think Clyne from Palace is nearing the end of his contract. I'm not as down on Hutton as a lot of people but he's highly rated in a position we all know we've had problems in.
He'll have lots of teams after him though so might be a non-starter.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on December 14, 2011, 10:42:11 AM
Any move for Clyne is dependent of what the manager's opinion of Lichaj is.

And about Cahill - lets not fall into the trap of talking him down too much, as he is a good player, just not the great and unforgivable loss some make him out to be. 
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Merv on December 14, 2011, 10:45:24 AM
Just have a fear Samba is an average player made to look good in a rubbish team.

I must admit, I'm not convinced about him either, John. He's a colossus of a defender and looks great when you see one of his occasional set-piece goals, but I'm not sure he's that good. He's been at Blackburn for a number of years, and let's face it, they are a club who will always sell, given the right offer. I think he's the kind of player a bigger club will be happy to snap up on a free or for a nominal fee of a couple of million.
You're right - with a defensive trio of Robinson behind Samba and Dann, I'd expect Blackburn to be a lot tougher defensively than they are. But they're not.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mister E on December 14, 2011, 10:46:14 AM
Any move for Clyne is dependent of what the manager's opinion of Lichaj is.
And whether he has the balls to accept that his summer signing is not quite cutting it.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JUAN PABLO on December 14, 2011, 10:47:15 AM
Hoilet would be a brilliant signing....


Spanish paper marca being reported as claiming we are interested in David Villa.  I wish.

Only if the Qatari royal family buyout rumour was true and probably not even then. Alas.

Is the ones who offered 1.5 billion for Manure . How much would Villa cost?   The team and not the player
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on December 14, 2011, 10:54:01 AM
Any move for Clyne is dependent of what the manager's opinion of Lichaj is.
And whether he has the balls to accept that his summer signing is not quite cutting it.

Maybe, but if we're thinking 'squad' then A N Other rightback is needed anyway.  And to be fair it also takes balls to stick with him if he thinks he'll improve, which I'm guessing he does.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Ryu on December 14, 2011, 11:11:13 AM
I'm just not sure about lichaj. When I first saw him play I thought he was ok but would never make it in the PL. But some of his performances last season made me think he could have a future here. I suppose it is all down to whether the manager rates him at all as he's at an age noW where he either needs to establish himself or move on.

But either way I think clyne could be an improvement.  My palace supporting mate reckons he's their best player and he's younger than Eric. 
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SoccerHQ on December 14, 2011, 11:21:08 AM
Lichaj played left back when on loan at Leeds so wouldn't surprised me if he got a chance there when he comes back from injury.

Pretty sure McLeish was after Clyne at SHA. That's usually a guide to who he might be after.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on December 14, 2011, 11:39:32 AM
Players like Lichaj need a good run of games (10+) to see if they are good enough.  Its no good playing them 1 week and then dropping them for a number of games.  Their development is then stop start.  I'd like him to play regularly as I think he will become a really good PL player.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on December 14, 2011, 11:46:53 AM
Clyne does look a good player so I'd be fine with that. And I like Lichaj. He's a solid player who gives his all as a lot of our younger players do and it would be good to see him have a run of games. The two of them would be decent options for the right back slot along with Herd. I also cant see McLeish abandoning Hutton any time soon though.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JUAN PABLO on December 14, 2011, 11:52:44 AM
Still cant believe we bought Hutton , when we could have probably got 20 year old Clyne for under half the price .     

Herd , Cuellar and Lichaj could have filled the spot until Clyne was back to fitness .   

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JUAN PABLO on December 14, 2011, 11:54:13 AM
from summer 2010

Birmingham City boss Alex McLeish is ready to seal a £2 million deal for Crystal Palace right back Nathan Clyne by the end of the week.

McLeish had a new £1.5 million offer rejected by George Burley's club last night, but he will come back in with an increased package.

The Blues have been after Clyne for weeks and see him as cover and competition for veteran skipper Stephen Carr as McLeish improves his options.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Shrek on December 14, 2011, 11:55:26 AM
Does anybody reckon we'd have a chance of getting Tiote from Newcastle?
Talk of Ashley might be willing to sell.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on December 14, 2011, 11:57:25 AM
Still cant believe we bought Hutton , when we could have probably got 20 year old Clyne for under half the price .     

Herd , Cuellar and Lichaj could have filled the spot until Clyne was back to fitness.

Could we?  With a year left, part of which he would be injured for, the player may well have wanted to wait for the Bosman and then have his pick.  Plus Cuellar was also injured at the time, as was I think Lichaj?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SoccerHQ on December 14, 2011, 11:58:16 AM
No.

I always thought Makoun would turn into our "Tiote" anyway.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Ryu on December 14, 2011, 12:00:12 PM
Tiote could be a replacement for fletcher at man ure or essien at chelsea. He won't be coming here, sadly.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Vanilla on December 14, 2011, 12:05:41 PM
Still cant believe we bought Hutton , when we could have probably got 20 year old Clyne for under half the price .     

Herd , Cuellar and Lichaj could have filled the spot until Clyne was back to fitness .

Regardless of the fact he wanted to move back to London, I still can't understand the selling of Luke Young from Villa's point of view.

You lose a reliable first team regular; you bring in a squad player new to the team; you pay £4 million from a diminished transfer budget!

All to save Villa £10 grand a week?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Merv on December 14, 2011, 12:09:02 PM
I thought we bought Hutton because Luke Young wanted out, Cuellar and Lichaj were both injured.

Herd has always been a midfield player, albeit with the attitude and ability to fill in at RB when needed.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: darren woolley on December 14, 2011, 12:14:11 PM
I wouldn't mind us going in for Zaha from Palace tricky player who I reckon could do a good job for us.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Ryu on December 14, 2011, 12:51:28 PM
Zaha is a skillful player with a lot of potential but if we signed him I wouldn't bank on him doing a job for our first team just yet.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: brontebilly on December 14, 2011, 12:55:18 PM
think some of you are being very harsh on Cahill. isnt a worldbeater but put him next to someone like Dunne and he will be fine. Still quick and reads the game well. Was very impressed with him at the weekend to be honest. He was a distance their best player. He looks nailed on for Chelsea in Jan. Would love to see him back at Villa but wont happen.

No to any more loan deals too. Lets bite the bullet and buy players. Sickening seeing Kyle Walker this season. Nowhere near the Spurs team, comes on loan to us and suddenly he is straight in. It is so small time its ridiculous.

If we are as stony broke as we seem, then the likes of Delph, Ireland, Cuellar, Collins, Beye, Heskey should be offered up. No one will want Beye or Heskey though. Id say Cuellar will run down his contract too as he wont get anywhere near the wages we are paying him elsewhere.

Must keep Petrov until the end of the season whatever happens.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Grande Pablo on December 14, 2011, 01:04:26 PM
If there was a Blackburn fire sale I'd be happy with Olsen & Hoilet.

Not sure Zamora would give us anything different.

I don't think Delph offers much - I'd take a punt on Lallana from Southampton.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on December 14, 2011, 01:22:55 PM
No to any more loan deals too. Lets bite the bullet and buy players. Sickening seeing Kyle Walker this season. Nowhere near the Spurs team, comes on loan to us and suddenly he is straight in. It is so small time its ridiculous.

For me there's two types of loans:-
1.  Sending a young player out to gain experience.  Walker to us and what we're doing with Gardner to Coventry right now.
2.  An established pro who isn't getting a game, so goes to put himself in the shop window.

If you mean the first type, then I agree, but I'd like the second type right now to get us through until Gardner is ready.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Aston Manor on December 14, 2011, 01:46:19 PM
Still cant believe we bought Hutton , when we could have probably got 20 year old Clyne for under half the price .     

Herd , Cuellar and Lichaj could have filled the spot until Clyne was back to fitness .

Regardless of the fact he wanted to move back to London, I still can't understand the selling of Luke Young from Villa's point of view.

You lose a reliable first team regular; you bring in a squad player new to the team; you pay £4 million from a diminished transfer budget!

All to save Villa £10 grand a week?

As I recall Houllier was going to let Young go so he bought a place down in London. When McLeish came in and had his move within 30 miles of Villa park edict that was clearly not going to sit well with Luke Young who had been told he could leave, and who had just bought a house in London.  So, Hutton it is.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TheSandman on December 14, 2011, 02:35:44 PM
Does anybody reckon we'd have a chance of getting Tiote from Newcastle?
Talk of Ashley might be willing to sell.

We should have had the good sense to sign him when he was available for a few million and we needed a defensive midfielder. Sadly, he now has bigger fish to fry.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Ryu on December 14, 2011, 03:29:33 PM
Crazy, unbelievable transfer story time!!!!

I can't link very effectively on my blackberry but according to the mail the spanish paper Marca are linking us with David Villa. They also call us on of the 'great' english clubs.

Obviously won't happen but that won't stop me spending the rest of the afternoon day dreaming about us signing him.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Edvard Remberg on December 14, 2011, 03:38:01 PM
Not sure if its old - but this is at least a rumour of a higher calibre ;)

Villa to Villa (http://www.birminghammail.net/birmingham-sport/aston-villa-fc/aston-villa-news/2011/12/14/aston-villa-spanish-press-link-barcelona-s-david-villa-with-move-to-villa-park-97319-29951873/)
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on December 14, 2011, 04:20:21 PM
I will eat my shoes if we sign David Villa.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on December 14, 2011, 04:24:43 PM
There is nobody who loves (Aston) Villa more than I and I can imagine most things are possible for this great club but that just isn't one of them. In fact its absolute bollocks of the most ludicrous nature and I can't believe it has made it to print.
I rate (David) Villa as one of the top 3 strikers in the world. And so will most of the largest, most ambitious, champions league playing clubs in the world.

Yes, I'm sure he wants to come and play for Big 'Eck in the freezing piss.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on December 14, 2011, 04:26:18 PM
Not sure if its old - but this is at least a rumour of a higher calibre ;)

Villa to Villa (http://www.birminghammail.net/birmingham-sport/aston-villa-fc/aston-villa-news/2011/12/14/aston-villa-spanish-press-link-barcelona-s-david-villa-with-move-to-villa-park-97319-29951873/)

In the comments bit, this made me giggle:-

5er says we'd still pick Emile Heskey ahead of him.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: The Laughing Policeman on December 14, 2011, 04:32:35 PM
From the glimpse I had of today's B'ham Mail, the Fonz is not for sale and that he will be up front with Bent on Sunday.
So, reading between the lines, yes he is for sale but not at he silly offers made for him. "Go out on Sunday and make a name for yourself" and at the same time add a couple of million to the asking price.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Steve kirk on December 14, 2011, 04:41:43 PM
I think there will be a lot more activity in January that any of us would have thought but I hope that does not include Petrov and Dunne, probably in the summer for Petrov but not now, we need their steadying influence between now and the end of this season.   
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on December 14, 2011, 04:45:45 PM
From the glimpse I had of today's B'ham Mail, the Fonz is not for sale and that he will be up front with Bent on Sunday.
So, reading between the lines, yes he is for sale but not at he silly offers made for him. "Go out on Sunday and make a name for yourself" and at the same time add a couple of million to the asking price.

Just checked it online and that the general gist of it, but Peter grant is talking him up quite a lot.  Ultimately, he may need to go as I can't see him starting regularly while Gabby and Bent are here, both of whom are I hope and expect to stay.

And that's before he gets knocked further down the pecking order when Villa gets here!!   
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on December 14, 2011, 04:46:49 PM
regarding the David Villa rumour, I laughed so hard that I urinated a little.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulTheVillan on December 14, 2011, 06:02:03 PM
So, Grant has been talking up Delfouneso.

That means he'll be out on loan tomorrow.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dante Lavelli on December 14, 2011, 06:16:04 PM
I rate (David) Villa as one of the top 3 strikers in the world. And so will most of the largest, most ambitious, champions league playing clubs in the world.

Really!  I'm not sure whether it is because he often plays slightly out of position for Spain and Barca but I have always been a bit meh about him.  Obviously a quality player but I'm not sure he's suited to that inside left role he plays and I cannot really remember his valencia days where he presumably played more centrally.

Regardless it's not a selection conundrum that AMc will be having any time soon.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: john e on December 14, 2011, 06:23:51 PM
as long as D Villa can accept being second place to Heskey in the pecking order he should be ok
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SoccerHQ on December 14, 2011, 06:39:49 PM
From the glimpse I had of today's B'ham Mail, the Fonz is not for sale and that he will be up front with Bent on Sunday.
So, reading between the lines, yes he is for sale but not at he silly offers made for him. "Go out on Sunday and make a name for yourself" and at the same time add a couple of million to the asking price.

I'd be stunned if he starts on Sunday. Think he'll leave in the summer aswell.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: eamonn on December 14, 2011, 06:41:05 PM
So, Grant has been talking up Delfouneso.

That means he'll be out on loan tomorrow.

And if he didn't mention him it would mean he's no future either I suppose.
I'm not going to be cynical about quotes related to him as I still think there's a great player in the Fonz.
I think the longest run of starts he's had was two or three.
I hope he gets a chance on Saturday in Gabby's absence and takes it.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Edvard Remberg on December 14, 2011, 07:50:09 PM
I think it has been a boy-hood dream for David Villa to play for either Villareal or Aston Villa! Therefor i rate this speculation at 98.37%

Also he will play for 30% of what Heskey gets - because he likes us so much.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JUAN PABLO on December 14, 2011, 08:33:39 PM
regarding the David Villa rumour, I laughed so hard that I urinated a little.

I knew it was bollocks  because its not just Villa , I heard Tevez wants to come too with David Villa  ;)

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on December 14, 2011, 09:28:35 PM
regarding the David Villa rumour, I laughed so hard that I urinated a little.

I knew it was bollocks  because its not just Villa , I heard Tevez wants to come too with David Villa  ;)



I think some lazy journo overheard a conversation. It was a noisy bar and one bloke said to the other, "I heard David XXXX is going to Villa" What the journo heard was David **muffled sounds** and Villa and Bob's your uncle. I hope someone changes the Wiki page for David Villa so that he can be one of us even for one day.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JUAN PABLO on December 14, 2011, 11:29:04 PM
regarding the David Villa rumour, I laughed so hard that I urinated a little.

I knew it was bollocks  because its not just Villa , I heard Tevez wants to come too with David Villa  ;)



I think some lazy journo overheard a conversation. It was a noisy bar and one bloke said to the other, "I heard David XXXX is going to Villa" What the journo heard was David **muffled sounds** and Villa and Bob's your uncle. I hope someone changes the Wiki page for David Villa so that he can be one of us even for one day.

yeah  more like David Villa his flying to his Villa in January and got confused
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: UK Redsox on December 15, 2011, 07:59:20 AM
Has there ever been a transfer rumour less likely to come true than David Villa to Aston Villa
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Percy McCarthy on December 15, 2011, 08:19:34 AM
D Villa will be Bernard Arnault's first signing.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on December 15, 2011, 08:41:57 AM
Well, that's disappointing because if they've fallen out as reported, we wont get Messi.
I'd settle for Ronaldo though I suppose.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: richard moore on December 15, 2011, 09:03:38 AM
Has there ever been a transfer rumour less likely to come true than David Villa to Aston Villa

Carlton Palmer perhaps? Steve Bull maybe?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: KevinGage on December 15, 2011, 09:07:41 AM
It's good, but you're going to have to go a long way to beat 'Maradona to B-lose' in the Evening Mail a few years back.

I forget if they were in the Second or the Third division at the time.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JUAN PABLO on December 15, 2011, 10:57:38 AM
http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2011/dec/14/david-villa-chelsea-barcelona-guardiola?newsfeed=true


Guardiola said he isnt going to Aston Villa ..     not in January anyway ;)   
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on December 15, 2011, 12:06:46 PM
Bad news, fellow supporters.

He won't be going anywhere for the foreseeable now.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2011/dec/15/david-villa-six-months-breaking-leg

Time to move on to our second choice target, which, if it's anything like the progression down the list of managerial options, will be Tommy Tynan.
Title: Transfer rumours
Post by: cdbearsfan on December 15, 2011, 12:46:35 PM
Gutted.

I can't think of any other players who have names like Aston Villa. A sneaky bid for Anton Ferdinand as his first name is only one letter off?
Title: Transfer rumours
Post by: cdbearsfan on December 15, 2011, 12:46:54 PM
Gutted.

I can't think of any other players who have names like Aston Villa. A sneaky bid for Anton Ferdinand as his first name is only one letter off?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: The Laughing Policeman on December 15, 2011, 12:50:16 PM
Erm, we have signed a player with a broken leg in the recent past. ;)
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on December 15, 2011, 12:54:04 PM
Absolutely gutted!  was looking forward to hearing the rumours gather pace about Villa to Villa
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: andyh on December 15, 2011, 12:56:10 PM
shit, just when we were 'really' going to sign him
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: VillaAlways on December 15, 2011, 01:22:06 PM
Super Marc linked with Rangers...as if
Albrighton rules out Rangers move
15/12/2011
  Winger Marc Albrighton has pledged his immediate future to Aston Villa and dismissed reports linking him with a move to Rangers.

Albrighton had struggled to command a regular first-team spot during the current campaign before returning to Alex McLeish's side against Manchester United 12 days ago. He scored the opening goal in Saturday's 2-1 win at Bolton but is adamant leaving Villa never crossed his mind when out of favour.

Academy product Albrighton, 22, said: "I have a mate at Rangers but I won't be going there anytime soon. I don't want to think about leaving at the minute. I know things have not been great. But I am a Villa boy and I can't think of anything worse than leaving the club that's given me all my games and all my happy moments."


 He added: "One day I may have to leave, and that will be a sad day for me, but at the moment I am concentrating on playing well for Villa.

"I want to fight for my place here and see if I can establish myself and get back to my best here. I don't want to take the easy route.



Read more: http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/latest/2011/12/15/albrighton-rules-out-rangers-move-115875-23636794/#ixzz1gbordnv8alise

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithe on December 15, 2011, 01:42:27 PM
I note that MON has been linked with signing Jelavic from Rangers for £10m, bless.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Shoody on December 15, 2011, 03:39:20 PM
Marc on DJ

Quote
"Stewart will be coming back with Liverpool and I'm looking forward to seeing him.

...

"It will be good to see him again. I think he made the right move for himself and you can't argue with that.  He's gone on to better himself as a player and become an established England international which he's doing at the minute.

Marc on leaving Villa

Quote
He added: "One day I may have to leave, and that will be a sad day for me, but at the moment I am concentrating on playing well for Villa.

Writing, meet Wall.


Yes there are bits he says about he wouldnt leave yet, loves the club. But still dont like seeing little comments like this from him.. Him, Gardner, Grealish and Gabby are my little hope for a Never-Leaving-Villa-Supporting Core to the team.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Richard E on December 15, 2011, 05:09:57 PM
As soon as we are "linked" with Villa he suffers a serious injury.

Is there any hope of us being "linked" with re-signing Downing?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rigadon on December 15, 2011, 05:16:58 PM
Marc on DJ

Quote
"Stewart will be coming back with Liverpool and I'm looking forward to seeing him.

...

"It will be good to see him again. I think he made the right move for himself and you can't argue with that.  He's gone on to better himself as a player and become an established England international which he's doing at the minute.

Marc on leaving Villa

Quote
He added: "One day I may have to leave, and that will be a sad day for me, but at the moment I am concentrating on playing well for Villa.

Writing, meet Wall.


Yes there are bits he says about he wouldnt leave yet, loves the club. But still dont like seeing little comments like this from him.. Him, Gardner, Grealish and Gabby are my little hope for a Never-Leaving-Villa-Supporting Core to the team.

it's a shame Albrighton thinks Liverpool are somehow bettering Downing.  He was a regular England player when he was with us.  Odd comment.

Anyway, hope the lad recovers some form and fulfils the promise he definitely has. 
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JUAN PABLO on December 15, 2011, 06:46:00 PM
I note that MON has been linked with signing Jelavic from Rangers for £10m, bless.

they reckon they are getting Tevez on loan            ha ha ha
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JJ-AV on December 15, 2011, 10:52:00 PM
Liverpool are bigger and better than us at the minute. That is undeniable.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 16, 2011, 12:38:23 AM
true, but for all that money they've spent they're not much different to us and the other 15 teams looking up at the CL regulars. only thing Downings gained is a bigger wage packet. which is probably enough for him.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: villa for life on December 16, 2011, 02:37:33 AM
Landon Donavon to Everton again - great deal for them, which should ensure they remain well clear of the bottom.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dave Clark Five on December 16, 2011, 08:29:13 AM
 'I don't want to take the easy route' says Marc. That implies he thinks he would walk into a first team place elsewhere.

Come on Marc, you're doing well here.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rigadon on December 16, 2011, 08:38:20 AM
Liverpool are bigger and better than us at the minute. That is undeniable.

Is it?  All they have done is send a fuck load of money on players who played for us or clubs similar to us last season.  They aren't significantly better than we are or significantly higher placed in the league.  They are just the best of the rest this season. 

Not looking for an argument by the way, I just don't see how they are currently all that superior.  I certainly don't see how Downing is bettering himself there.  They aren't playing in a competition we aren't (are they still in the Eurozone League? - is so, so what.)  They've had a couple of good results against the genuinely 'better' teams, granted.   

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: cheltenhamlion on December 16, 2011, 08:40:10 AM
They weren't in Europe at all this season.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: KevinGage on December 16, 2011, 08:46:29 AM
Rumours of Steven Davis returning in Jan.

It's the Mirror, so bring your own shovel as far as the salt is concerned, but it does have quotes from Big Eck:

 clicky (http://www.mirrorfootball.co.uk/transfer-news/Aston-Villa-transfer-gossip-Steven-Davis-of-Rangers-targeted-for-2m-return-to-club-article843207.html)

Quote
McLeish plans £2m raid on Rangers

Villa boss McLeish will make a second attempt to sign Davis next month.

The Northern Ireland international spent three years with Villa before moving to Fulham in 2007.

McLeish wants the 26-year-old to add drive to his midfield and failed with a deadline-day bid in August.

He said: “We may do it even if no one goes out the door.”

At that price it wouldn't be the worst bit of business in the world.
Davis was one of the few players we let go early into the MON era that I wouldn't have minded see stick around.   

Particularly when we had the likes of Sidwell treading water in midfield a little over 12 months later. 

With the Jenas situation and talk of Stan leaving, this would make a degree of sense.
 
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: cheltenhamlion on December 16, 2011, 08:50:36 AM
I thought he wasn't given a fair crack at the time he went. His game has matured up there, it isn't expensive. No brainer for me.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: KevinGage on December 16, 2011, 08:51:47 AM
Agreed cheltenhamlion.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pedro25 on December 16, 2011, 09:09:29 AM
He's ok, but is he any better than Bannan?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Chris Smith on December 16, 2011, 09:30:28 AM
He's ok, but is he any better than Bannan?

Different sort of player, I think, more of a box to box type. I'd be quite happy to see him come back.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Nirog72 on December 16, 2011, 09:32:48 AM
He's a different type of player to Bannan
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Percy McCarthy on December 16, 2011, 09:33:22 AM
Never rated him, maybe he's improved.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on December 16, 2011, 09:37:14 AM
I was a bit miffed when MON let him go as he wasn't given a proper run in the team.  Not sure about signing him back though.  Yes, he has matured a lot and probably improved his game albeit in a league which doesn't really offer much challeneges apart from the derby game between celtic and rangers.
I wouldn't be overly disappointed if we did sign him back as he is still fairly young and probably hasn't reached his full peak yet? 
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on December 16, 2011, 09:37:35 AM
Davis is not good enough. Absolutely pointless if true. Just try and loan a better player rather than scratch around the bargain bin and incorporate some of the youngsters who are (potentially if not actually) better players.
Fuck me we can do better than this, surely?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on December 16, 2011, 09:39:49 AM
It would be the sort of signing to keep us ticking over in midtable, not to sort to improve us at all.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Merv on December 16, 2011, 09:47:23 AM
Re: Albrighton. Let's not get over-excited and ignore this quote: "But I am a Villa boy and I can't think of anything worse than leaving the club that's given me all my games and all my happy moments."

I can't see him leaving unless we literally show him the door by not playing him (and he may have turned a corner now). That's also my fear with Clark.

Davis - he'd be okay, agree with those who say he'd keep us ticking over but wouldn't drive us forward particularly.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on December 16, 2011, 09:47:28 AM
Davis is not good enough. Absolutely pointless if true. Just try and loan a better player rather than scratch around the bargain bin and incorporate some of the youngsters who are (potentially if not actually) better players.
Fuck me we can do better than this, surely?

What I had to laugh at was the quote 'We may do this even if somebody doesn't go out of the door?'. That is a sad state of affairs, firstly he's average and secondly spending £2 million is seen as a really big deal.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on December 16, 2011, 09:48:21 AM
It would be the sort of signing to keep us ticking over in midtable, not to sort to improve us at all.

I agree.  His wage demands will probably low too.  I guess we have to kinda get used to signings like this for the next few seasons until the books are healthy again.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on December 16, 2011, 09:49:57 AM
Davis is not good enough. Absolutely pointless if true. Just try and loan a better player rather than scratch around the bargain bin and incorporate some of the youngsters who are (potentially if not actually) better players.
Fuck me we can do better than this, surely?

What I had to laugh at was the quote 'We may do this even if somebody doesn't go out of the door?'. That is a sad state of affairs, firstly he's average and secondly spending £2 million is seen as a really big deal.

I'd imagine that's more to do with space on our wagebill and not the fee itself.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on December 16, 2011, 09:52:14 AM
Well I'd have thought we are reaching a tipping point with the wage bill as well. Our squad has nowhere near enough depth or strength, so I'm not sure how much further we can strip it. Once Beye, Heskey and Ireland are gone that is pretty much it.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on December 16, 2011, 09:57:55 AM
As sad as it sounds, we are going to have to get used to signings like this for the foreseeable future and have to get used to finishing midtable.  Randy has finally realised he made a mistake by giving MON the license to spend spend spend and now has left him and the club in the shit.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Chris Smith on December 16, 2011, 10:05:36 AM
As sad as it sounds, we are going to have to get used to signings like this for the foreseeable future and have to get used to finishing midtable.  Randy has finally realised he made a mistake by giving MON the license to spend spend spend and now has left him and the club in the shit.

Another recruit to the ranks of the drama queens.

Firstly, he's a decent player. Secondly, MON was never given a licence to spend, spend, spend - a net spend of around £80m over 4 years is not excessive when the club say their target was champions league football. Thirdly, we're not in the shit, we're in transition and having to rebuild after losing 4 first team regulars in the summer.

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: KevinGage on December 16, 2011, 10:07:26 AM
It would be the sort of signing to keep us ticking over in midtable, not to sort to improve us at all.

Well it would be an improvement to see him in midfield rather than Heskey.

It's an area we are short in, particularly with Jenas gone and Petrov rumoured to be on the way out too.  We might have hoped for far better a few years back.  And we might return to those levels, either when the big earners doing nothing are finally off the wage bill or if RL sells up. 

Davis will do in the meantime. 

Not sure I'd trust Big Eck with a huge transfer budget anyroad.  In fact I'm pretty certain I wouldn't.  But if by the end of the season he has done well with this squad, moved out some of the deadwood and his own budget priced options have delivered, he might deserve a bit more faith.

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on December 16, 2011, 10:19:27 AM
As sad as it sounds, we are going to have to get used to signings like this for the foreseeable future and have to get used to finishing midtable.  Randy has finally realised he made a mistake by giving MON the license to spend spend spend and now has left him and the club in the shit.

Another recruit to the ranks of the drama queens.

Firstly, he's a decent player. Secondly, MON was never given a licence to spend, spend, spend - a net spend of around £80m over 4 years is not excessive when the club say their target was champions league football. Thirdly, we're not in the shit, we're in transition and having to rebuild after losing 4 first team regulars in the summer.

Drama queens?  give it a rest mate.

Firstly, I never said Davis was shit nor did I say he was brilliant.  I'm just questioning whether he has improved or not and also went on to say that I wouldnt be overly disappointed if we signed him.  Secondly, yes we lost 4 first team regulars but are left with a number of high earners i.e. Heskey, Beye, Ireland (although may not be a MON signing), Cuellar who MON signed and their wage packets are eating into the clubs wage structure hence we cant afford to go out and buy "better" players as we have to start reducing the wage bill.  Thirdly, we are kind of in the shit hence we have to get our books in order otherwise we could end up like Leeds (spending more than what we are bringing in!)
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Phil from the upper holte on December 16, 2011, 10:34:04 AM
Lets get Zat Knight and Shorey back as well, or even Kevin Phillips?? (tounge firmly in cheek)
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Aston Manor on December 16, 2011, 10:42:42 AM
Lets get Zat Knight and Shorey back as well, or even Kevin Phillips?? (tounge firmly in cheek)

Signing the likes of Davis we may as well go the whole hog and get O'Leary back.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mister E on December 16, 2011, 10:48:41 AM
Davis is a journeyman; a good one, but a journeyman.
What would he add over and above giving GG a full run-out? - some experience and a calm head, perhaps.
At £2m he'd be a useful squad player, I suppose. Probably better than Sidwell but more limited than Bannan.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Chris Smith on December 16, 2011, 10:51:32 AM
As sad as it sounds, we are going to have to get used to signings like this for the foreseeable future and have to get used to finishing midtable.  Randy has finally realised he made a mistake by giving MON the license to spend spend spend and now has left him and the club in the shit.

Another recruit to the ranks of the drama queens.

Firstly, he's a decent player. Secondly, MON was never given a licence to spend, spend, spend - a net spend of around £80m over 4 years is not excessive when the club say their target was champions league football. Thirdly, we're not in the shit, we're in transition and having to rebuild after losing 4 first team regulars in the summer.

Drama queens?  give it a rest mate.

Firstly, I never said Davis was shit nor did I say he was brilliant.  I'm just questioning whether he has improved or not and also went on to say that I wouldnt be overly disappointed if we signed him.  Secondly, yes we lost 4 first team regulars but are left with a number of high earners i.e. Heskey, Beye, Ireland (although may not be a MON signing), Cuellar who MON signed and their wage packets are eating into the clubs wage structure hence we cant afford to go out and buy "better" players as we have to start reducing the wage bill.  Thirdly, we are kind of in the shit hence we have to get our books in order otherwise we could end up like Leeds (spending more than what we are bringing in!)

We're in transition, there's a recession and we're realigning the wage bill. If we're in the shit then so are 99% of clubs in the country.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Clampy on December 16, 2011, 10:55:20 AM
I can't help thinking that Davis is the kind of player Wolves would buy. I'd personally rather bring Makoun and Gardner into the squad.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Chris Smith on December 16, 2011, 11:00:36 AM
I can't help thinking that Davis is the kind of player Wolves would buy. I'd personally rather bring Makoun and Gardner into the squad.

Problem we have is a lack of experience in the middle, Herd, Bannn and Delph have maybe 30 games between them at this level and Makoun and Gardner aren't going to change that.

For £2m it seems an ideal move for us.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dave Clark Five on December 16, 2011, 11:04:04 AM
Overheard a conversation that suggests Peter Whittingham is on his way back to us.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Aston Manor on December 16, 2011, 11:05:11 AM
I can't help thinking that Davis is the kind of player Wolves would buy. I'd personally rather bring Makoun and Gardner into the squad.

Problem we have is a lack of experience in the middle, Herd, Bannn and Delph have maybe 30 games between them at this level and Makoun and Gardner aren't going to change that.

For £2m it seems an ideal move for us.

But why? What's he adding? Playing on the left - as he has been for Rangers - means we lose width and would have to drop NZobbia or Albrighton. he doesn't create and yes he's a box to box player. Kind of the role Petrov has been doing and been doing well so far. If money is at a premium why by not to improve the squad but just to add to it?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Chris Smith on December 16, 2011, 11:09:00 AM
He'll, presumably do the same roll earmarked for Jenas. We're light in central midfield and won't get away with 442 against better sides so need to find a better balance than the various combinations have given us so far and, perhaps, long term a replacement for Petrov.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Clampy on December 16, 2011, 11:13:38 AM
Experience is needed of course but the only way players like Makoun are going to get premiership expereince is by playing them. Blues did'nt have an issue in playing a 17 year old last night.

Davis would be a decent squad addition, but could hold back the likes of Bannan, Gardner, Herd etc.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Merv on December 16, 2011, 11:15:39 AM
Lets get Zat Knight and Shorey back as well, or even Kevin Phillips?? (tounge firmly in cheek)

Knight and Shorey are available on frees next summer, as are Thomas Sorensen and Gary Cahill.... let's do it.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dave Clark Five on December 16, 2011, 11:17:04 AM
Lets get Zat Knight and Shorey back as well, or even Kevin Phillips?? (tounge firmly in cheek)
Should never have got rid of Kevin Phillips in the first place.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rigadon on December 16, 2011, 11:19:59 AM
I remember it being a bit of a shock when we sold Davis.  It was of course tempered with the feel-good factor surrounding us at the time.  I think that sometimes you can judge a player by the other clubs who are interested.  For example, David Villa: Chelsea, Man City.   Steven Davis: Villa & ?  Somebody mentioned Wolves and I thin that'd be about right. 

I'd prefer us to get somebody in on loan.

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on December 16, 2011, 11:21:57 AM
It would be the sort of signing to keep us ticking over in midtable, not to sort to improve us at all.
Well it would be an improvement to see him in midfield rather than Heskey.

It's an area we are short in, particularly with Jenas gone and Petrov rumoured to be on the way out too.  We might have hoped for far better a few years back.  And we might return to those levels, either when the big earners doing nothing are finally off the wage bill or if RL sells up. 

Davis will do in the meantime.

Don't get me wrong - it's a signing that makes sense and for £2m will prove to be good value.  But it is a sign that the present austerity measures may last a be lasting a bit longer than I had hoped they would.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on December 16, 2011, 11:25:41 AM
Overheard a conversation that suggests Peter Whittingham is on his way back to us.

Whittingham is a strange one.  His scoring record is brilliant a level down to the point where I'm amazed nobody has taken a punt on him before now.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SoccerHQ on December 16, 2011, 11:35:21 AM
It would be the sort of signing to keep us ticking over in midtable, not to sort to improve us at all.

Agreed, wouldn't excite me at all.

McLeish did actually sign some players from abroad when he was at SHA, Benitez, Hleb, Martins, Beaujsjor so I don't understand why he's under this buy british spell now he's with us.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Merv on December 16, 2011, 11:36:41 AM
You may have just answered your own question... those players weren't exactly a success, maybe that's put McLeish off?

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on December 16, 2011, 11:36:53 AM
Holding back Gardner is my biggest concern with this, as £2 million is a bit of a no lose. It's just a shame these are the kind of players we're looking at now.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SoccerHQ on December 16, 2011, 11:39:04 AM
Benitez was o.k, not a clinical finisher but certainly looked better than Cameron Jerome.

Martins was injured for most of his time but scored the winner in the cup final.

Hleb was shite and clearly didn't fit into the McLeish style of play, same as David Bentley.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on December 16, 2011, 11:45:45 AM
Eck's best signings for SHA have been Foster and Hart on loan, Gardner, Johnson and Dann all of whom are british.  I think his main flops have been when he has ventured out abroad - Hleb, Zigic, Beasujour or however u spell his name.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JUAN PABLO on December 16, 2011, 11:45:56 AM
Well If it means not buying Guthrie . Then I would prefer SD
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SoccerHQ on December 16, 2011, 11:47:33 AM
That Jiranek look o.k for them when Dann got injured, was immense in the cup final I remember.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on December 16, 2011, 11:48:06 AM
I thought Guthrie was meant to be a good player?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Merv on December 16, 2011, 11:49:40 AM
Yes, there might have been mitigating circumstances for Martins and Hleb not working out, I agree, but they didn't work out. Then you have Zigic, who wasn't great either. May be that McLeish has decided he'd rather go for players he knows more about. Just my interpretation.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SoccerHQ on December 16, 2011, 11:52:10 AM
Just checked, he actually signed Arteta for Rangers when he was 20 from Barca aswell.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on December 16, 2011, 11:52:30 AM
I think you're right Merv.  Martins was injured for most of their campaign and so was Hleb but a few noses I know, didn't rate Hleb when he played.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on December 16, 2011, 11:56:40 AM
I'm not giddy with excitement if true, but it's hardly the end of the world either. £2m equates to 5 weeks of paying for Habib Beye to sit on his arse and do nothing. He's a bit more experienced now and maybe he can add something. It isn't a world beater signing, but we're not in that market right now. I would hope that there might be a more "flashy" loan deal or two out there as well.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on December 16, 2011, 11:57:21 AM
Just checked, he actually signed Arteta for Rangers when he was 20 from Barca aswell.

Yeah pulling something like that out of the bag would be good.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Chris Smith on December 16, 2011, 11:58:43 AM
Yes, there might have been mitigating circumstances for Martins and Hleb not working out, I agree, but they didn't work out. Then you have Zigic, who wasn't great either. May be that McLeish has decided he'd rather go for players he knows more about. Just my interpretation.

He didn't sign Zigic, the board did against his advice.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on December 16, 2011, 11:59:07 AM
I'm not giddy with excitement if true, but it's hardly the end of the world either. £2m equates to 5 weeks of paying for Habib Beye to sit on his arse and do nothing. He's a bit more experienced now and maybe he can add something. It isn't a world beater signing, but we're not in that market right now. I would hope that there might be a more "flashy" loan deal or two out there as well.

Unfortunately we can only sign one more player on loan.  I would have hoped for someone a bit bigger and stronger than Davis to boss and control the middle of the park.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Merv on December 16, 2011, 12:03:10 PM
Yes, there might have been mitigating circumstances for Martins and Hleb not working out, I agree, but they didn't work out. Then you have Zigic, who wasn't great either. May be that McLeish has decided he'd rather go for players he knows more about. Just my interpretation.

He didn't sign Zigic, the board did against his advice.

I know that (this is hard work today)... I'm offering my thoughts on why McLeish may feel happier looking closer to home for British players on the transfer front, based on perhaps his not entirely happy and successful experiences at Blues. It's not a dig at McLeish by any means, I can understand why he might prefer to consider players he is more familiar with. Hence the link with Davis.

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on December 16, 2011, 12:05:35 PM
I' crap at maths at 7am. It's a year of Habib Beye's wage which hardly makes it better or a drop in the ocean given some of the money we've coughed up in recent years for much worse.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithe on December 16, 2011, 12:05:39 PM
Overheard a conversation that suggests Peter Whittingham is on his way back to us.

Whittingham is a strange one.  His scoring record is brilliant a level down to the point where I'm amazed nobody has taken a punt on him before now.

When he was a kid he lodged with a family I knew, nice lad but scared of his own shadow and seemed more shocked than anyone that he was playing for Villa.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: LeeB on December 16, 2011, 01:20:15 PM
Whilst neither player would set the pulse racing, I'd be happier to Whittingham back as he actually has an end product, unlike Davis.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TheSandman on December 16, 2011, 01:40:56 PM
There is no chance Rangers will see us Steve Davis for £2million. He is their captain and has a 5 year contract.

Treble it and they may make a deal and even that is in light of their financial problems.

Not a bad player and has improved for regular football with them. My main concern is not his ability but the fact that he will be another person standing in the way of Gardner or Bannan. 
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on December 16, 2011, 01:51:49 PM
Petrov, Delph, Bannan, Makoun, Clark, Johnson, Carruthers, Herd, Ireland and Cameron.
10 players I'd rather see in central mdfield than Davis. ASll better or potentially better than Davis.


How many better midfielders than Davis must be available for loan? Fucking loads I'd wager.
Therefore, I see no point in it whatsoever.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pedro25 on December 16, 2011, 02:08:30 PM
What next Ridgewell, Stefan Moore?  That crop were not good enough for top half prem (perhaps Cahill aside) hence they made decent livings in Scotland and the Championship.  I'd rather see how good our current crop is first, Clark, Bannan, Albrighton etc. or even the next batch of Gardner, Burke etc. before we delve back into the past.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on December 16, 2011, 02:11:11 PM
There is no chance Rangers will see us Steve Davis for £2million. He is their captain and has a 5 year contract.

Treble it and they may make a deal and even that is in light of their financial problems.

Not a bad player and has improved for regular football with them. My main concern is not his ability but the fact that he will be another person standing in the way of Gardner or Bannan. 

Yep that's my biggest concern too. I want Gardner in, if he's good enough get him in.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 16, 2011, 03:03:15 PM
 can't see a problem with Davis apart from the old never re-signing a former player rule - wasn't he POTY for us so hardly rubbish compared with pish like Delph and Ireland currently littering our squad. Whittingham would be odd though
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on December 16, 2011, 03:13:15 PM
Delph is not Pish and definitely a better player than Davis and Ireland is comfortably better if used and motivated (yes, I know). The quality of our team when Davis got that award was shocking and to be honest I think a few decent goals glossed over the fact he wasn't all that good.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 16, 2011, 03:25:08 PM
well i thought he was pretty good in a team lacking in quality and thats what we have currently. If we had Milner, Young, and Barry and a transfer budget of 80m i'd probaby think he was pointless too, but we haven't. As for delpth when is he going to come good? not as though he hasn't had time. getting on for 3 seasons isn't it? Ireland i've given up on so however good these guys could be potentially we need someone who can perform now.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: frankmosswasmyuncle on December 16, 2011, 03:39:53 PM
Don't see the point in signing Davis except for a bit of (SP!?) experience.
I'd much prefer to see Delph/Bannan given an extended run, even Clark as the holding MF, and slowly introduce Gardner. If we're in transition let's use what we already have rather than gamble transfer funds on mediocre players like Davis. We've already got mediocre.
Then use the funds on getting a quality CM when the right one is available.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on December 16, 2011, 03:48:25 PM
Delph is still a kid and still learning. I think that's often overlooked. Plus he had an injury for a whole season that would end careers not so long ago so I think more slack is called for. Its not like he's had three complete seasons. More like sporadic spells in the side and has done alright. Yes he has to prove himself so lets not buy somebody we know isnt good enough and stick with some players we already own who might be.

Or get better players.


Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on December 16, 2011, 03:52:34 PM
Lets look at it this way - Jenas hardly played for us at all, so not signing Davis would mean we have the same midfield options we've used so far.  While we all know we need to improve that area of the park, we've managed to get by as a mid-table side with what we've got.  So, while all those in favour and/or think it would be a good deal may want him, would he really get us any further up the table?  No for me, so it would be a move to just consolidate where we are.  If that's the case, I'd rather take the chance we may slip a place or two and save the money for the summer. 
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on December 16, 2011, 03:55:43 PM
Delph is still a kid and still learning. I think that's often overlooked. Plus he had an injury for a whole season that would end careers not so long ago so I think more slack is called for. Its not like he's had three complete seasons. More like sporadic spells in the side and has done alright. Yes he has to prove himself so lets not buy somebody we know isnt good enough and stick with some players we already own who might be.

Or get better players.




The more I think about it, I do think it's a pointless signing. The improvement he would bring to the side would be negligable unless he has improved massively since he left. We may as well just save the money and get our kids in the side.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Chris Smith on December 16, 2011, 04:09:41 PM
If the youngsters are good enough they'll force their way into the side and if not they'll move on. Signing Steven Davis (or anyone else) will not be make any difference to that.

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithesShin on December 16, 2011, 04:23:52 PM
I really can't see much point in signing Davis. He's not realistically going to improve us much, if at all. I'd assume he's going to be on 30K a week or so, so why tie up 1.5million a year in someone like him when wages are tight as they are. Surely we should be signing someone who at least has the potential to get us moving in the right direction?

If anything, I'd probably prefer not to sign anyone and to at least see if any of the kids we have are good enough then take stock of things on the summer. May save us a chunk of cash longterm. And if only 1 or 2 or the kids are good enough then that 1.5mill + transfer fee could then be better invested next summer on players who can move us back upwards.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ashkar on December 16, 2011, 05:37:55 PM
Diame, Jelavic and Dann/Samba will improve the spine of the side no end. Might not happen this Jan but we should try atleast for summer. Investment of about 25 m will be required. Diame might be needed to be brought in this Jan. Also i am sure by summer the following players will not be at villa,

OUT: Heskey, Cuellar, Beye, Ireland, Makoun, Jenas, Weimann and Lowry.

IN: Diame (5m), Dann/Samba (8m), Jelavic (10m), Donavon (season loan)
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dave on December 16, 2011, 05:51:06 PM
Sorry, Jelavic for £10m? What?

Because he scored not many goals in Austria and a few more in Scotland?

How is that in any way worth paying £10m for?

And Donavan has gone to Everton like he was always going to.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: KevinGage on December 16, 2011, 06:35:10 PM
When Davis left, there was a feeling we were all geared to go on to bigger and better things.

If we had actually delivered on that, I could understand the snobbery/ reluctance to get a player like Davis back.   But for the past few years, our midfield has contained the likes of Steve Sidwell and NRC.   Different types of players maybe, but I'd say Davis is better than both of them. I don't think there's much in it between him and Petrov either.

In the season when he won Player of the Season, we had the likes of Barry, Mellberg, Baros and Milner in the side, so we weren't completely lacking in quality. 

I'm not suggesting that if he comes back we'll build a side around him, but he can cover a few positions, knows the club and shouldn't have any problems settling in. No brainer for me.   
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Lowendbehold on December 16, 2011, 07:13:23 PM
Ignoring Ireland who appears well down the pecking order, the only experienced central midfielder is Petrov. He he were to get injured or lose form we would be in a mess relying on the kids.

So I think we need some experience in there.  Not sure about Davis though, but I haven't seen him play recently.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: brian green on December 16, 2011, 07:27:58 PM
I think it is a reflection of how unimaginative we have become that we should chuck out Makoun as a total write off and consider re signing a player who has not improved since he left us and is at best a journeyman player.   McLeish is so safety first and belt and braces in everything he does.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Boz on December 16, 2011, 07:49:21 PM
I think it is a reflection of how unimaginative we have become that we should chuck out Makoun as a total write off and consider re signing a player who has not improved since he left us and is at best a journeyman player.   McLeish is so safety first and belt and braces in everything he does.

Summed up accurately. AM just seems to want players he's comfortable with from past experience and if it was in the SPL, it's unlikely they will be Premiership standard, and Davis is just an average player. As has been said by others, better to save the money for the summer. Signing Davis is not going to ensure our survival in the Premiership so why bother?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: brian green on December 16, 2011, 08:00:05 PM
Precisely   If we have only a limited amount of money it must be spent shrewdly plus the fact that if these tight purse strings are here to stay we have to be able to trade to generate funds to spend in the transfer market.

I think it was Fat Sam who called players like Davis milk bottles because you don't get anything back on them.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on December 16, 2011, 08:00:18 PM
Diame is out of contract next summer, so 3m in Jan would be worth it IMO. I would prefer Craig Gargoyle back to Davis though as he is such a goal threat.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ROBBO on December 16, 2011, 08:06:08 PM
Davis has done okay in an inferior league but would be found out in the prem. Getting rid of Makoun and bringing him in is ridiculous.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on December 16, 2011, 08:22:04 PM
Diame, Jelavic and Dann/Samba will improve the spine of the side no end. Might not happen this Jan but we should try atleast for summer. Investment of about 25 m will be required. Diame might be needed to be brought in this Jan. Also i am sure by summer the following players will not be at villa,

OUT: Heskey, Cuellar, Beye, Ireland, Makoun, Jenas, Weimann and Lowry.

IN: Diame (5m), Dann/Samba (8m), Jelavic (10m), Donavon (season loan)



Maybe to first, yes to second, fuck no to third, nope to last. We don't only have to look at players who have played in England or the British Isles.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: frankmosswasmyuncle on December 16, 2011, 08:35:37 PM
Diame, Jelavic and Dann/Samba will improve the spine of the side no end. Might not happen this Jan but we should try atleast for summer. Investment of about 25 m will be required. Diame might be needed to be brought in this Jan. Also i am sure by summer the following players will not be at villa,

OUT: Heskey, Cuellar, Beye, Ireland, Makoun, Jenas, Weimann and Lowry.

IN: Diame (5m), Dann/Samba (8m), Jelavic (10m), Donavon (season loan)



Maybe to first, yes to second, fuck no to third, nope to last. We don't only have to look at players who have played in England or the British Isles.

Diame - yes
Samba - yes
Dann - no
Jelavic - ffs NO!
Donovan - no thanks.

the first 2 cos they are likely to be an improvement; the rest because, like Davis, they offer us nothing better than we already have.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on December 16, 2011, 08:42:57 PM
Makoun should be given the chance to play before we spend money on someone like Davis.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dave on December 16, 2011, 08:45:46 PM
Am I the only one who has never seen anything in Diame that would me play him ahead of Herd or Delph, let alone actually spend money on him?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: KevinGage on December 16, 2011, 08:48:09 PM
The times I've seen him I've been impressed.  Physically imposing but also OK with the ball at his feet.

I'd be a bit concerned that he hasn't always been a first team regular though, even at  a side like Wigan.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: frankmosswasmyuncle on December 16, 2011, 08:53:21 PM
Diame seems to have a physical presence that we lack and would be an ideal foil for some of our lightweight midfielders. And we do seem to be well blessed in that department!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Ryu on December 16, 2011, 09:30:36 PM
Whatever your feelings on steven davis is it really necessary to criticise our manager for something he hasn't even done yet?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Steve kirk on December 16, 2011, 10:42:40 PM
I know Davis coming back does not set the pulse racing but I always thought he was a decent player and central midfield as stated before is a bit light as I dont count Ireland as a true member of the squad, Its still vital though to keep Petrov till the summer I dont want Davis as a replacement he needs to be an addition.     
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: brontebilly on December 16, 2011, 11:18:15 PM
Am I the only one who has never seen anything in Diame that would me play him ahead of Herd or Delph, let alone actually spend money on him?

nope whenever I have seen him play he runs around like a headless chicken. A fantastic athlete and presence but seems to have no idea about his positioning
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Matt C on December 16, 2011, 11:26:57 PM
Yannick Djalo now not coming for trial so we can rule him out.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: WALTERS WARRIORS on December 16, 2011, 11:55:49 PM
Think Delph has something but is still not effective enough to be a first team choice. Steve Davis is not going to improve the first team. What has happened to this scout who has a massive insight into up and coming future stars ?? Think Gardner and Clarke guided by Petrov could be the way forward in midfield .......
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Clampy on December 17, 2011, 10:57:20 AM
Getting rid of Makoun and bringing him in is ridiculous.

Yes, but he's had 7 games to prove himself in the Premiership, which apparantley is quite enough.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JUAN PABLO on December 17, 2011, 11:05:34 AM
Getting rid of Makoun and bringing him in is ridiculous.

Yes, but he's had 7 games to prove himself in the Premiership, which apparantley is quite enough.

Can you Imagine Wenger moving Henry on after 7 games .   Yes , I know he aint Henry but you get my point , some players need time  , yet some players who are rubbish get plenty of time .
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Clampy on December 17, 2011, 11:19:18 AM
Getting rid of Makoun and bringing him in is ridiculous.

Yes, but he's had 7 games to prove himself in the Premiership, which apparantley is quite enough.

Can you Imagine Wenger moving Henry on after 7 games .   Yes , I know he aint Henry but you get my point , some players need time  , yet some players who are rubbish get plenty of time .

It's a good point though, Arsenal have bought in loads of foreign players who have settled into the Premiership without a problem and yes it's taken them time. Song for example is starting to look like a very good footballer.

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 17, 2011, 12:12:39 PM
The whole Makoun thing was bonkers. I can only imagine AM had to lose a player's wages before he could bring someone in, and he was the only one he could shift
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on December 17, 2011, 12:21:42 PM
The fact we haven't given Makoun a proper chance is absolute madness.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Chris Smith on December 17, 2011, 01:51:53 PM
The whole Makoun thing was bonkers. I can only imagine AM had to lose a player's wages before he could bring someone in, and he was the only one he could shift

It's obviously to do with wages. In an ideal world we'd have let him have more time but we're already doing that with several youngsters who we are having to assess as we go along. We need a few who are ready to play now. As it stands Petrov is our only experienced central midfield player, to think we can go through the season like that is the real madness.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Lowendbehold on December 17, 2011, 01:52:45 PM
The fact we haven't given Makoun a proper chance is absolute madness.

I tend to agree, but isnt he out now for a few months?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on December 17, 2011, 01:55:22 PM
I think he is, but I don't think we should be shipping him out when he comes back. I think he could make a useful contribution in midfield.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Clampy on December 17, 2011, 02:02:05 PM
The whole Makoun thing was bonkers. I can only imagine AM had to lose a player's wages before he could bring someone in, and he was the only one he could shift

It's obviously to do with wages. In an ideal world we'd have let him have more time but we're already doing that with several youngsters who we are having to assess as we go along. We need a few who are ready to play now. As it stands Petrov is our only experienced central midfield player, to think we can go through the season like that is the real madness.

On the other side of the coin though, Newcastle threw in Cabaye at the start of the season and have stuck with him and he looks a decent player. Besides, Makoun has played Champions League Football and over 50 times for his country so he can't be that un-experienced.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on December 17, 2011, 02:03:08 PM
Merson just said Villa would be ideal for Hoillett, but doubts we have any money. Probably about right.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Shrek on December 17, 2011, 03:39:31 PM
Merson just said Villa would be ideal for Hoillett, but doubts we have any money. Probably about right.

I'd love him, the kid is a special talent, but spurs have been sniffing around.

Shame really look at what's happened to the likes of Pienaar and Kranjar.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dante Lavelli on December 17, 2011, 04:20:24 PM
Merson just said Villa would be ideal for Hoillett, but doubts we have any money. Probably about right.

I'd love him, the kid is a special talent, but spurs have been sniffing around.

Shame really look at what's happened to the likes of Pienaar and Kranjar.

The annoying thing about Kranjar and Pienaar is that Sours bought the pair for pretty much bugger all.  If they sold one of them they'd cover their costs.  Hoillet is in a similar position at Blackburn with his contract running down.

Ideally Villa would be a bit more savvy in the transfer market and focus on buying players who's value will increase rather than the likes of Dunne, Collins and even Merson himself.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mister E on December 17, 2011, 04:21:25 PM
Might b
Merson just said Villa would be ideal for Hoillett, but doubts we have any money. Probably about right.
Might be better to look at Redmond if we think we need another wide player - at 17 and at the financially-titantic Birmingham, he would probably cost alot less than Hoilet
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dante Lavelli on December 17, 2011, 04:29:54 PM
Might b
Merson just said Villa would be ideal for Hoillett, but doubts we have any money. Probably about right.
Might be better to look at Redmond if we think we need another wide player - at 17 and at the financially-titantic Birmingham, he would probably cost alot less than Hoilet

I think Hoillet's contract runs out this summer so he might still be good value for money.  I think a fee would still need to be paid as he is young but as demonstrated by the money spurs paid for that Palace youngster it is rarely as much as his market value.

Regardless Redmond (and their young keeper) is a good shout.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: olaftab on December 17, 2011, 04:36:18 PM
I think we will sign  acouple of top names in January and than push on for a CL place ;D
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mister E on December 17, 2011, 05:05:54 PM
I think we will sign  acouple of top names in January and than push on for a CL place ;D
I'll have some of what you're on!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: john2710 on December 17, 2011, 06:18:56 PM
The whole Makoun thing was bonkers. I can only imagine AM had to lose a player's wages before he could bring someone in, and he was the only one he could shift

We had too many players of the same type, Bannan, Ireland, Makoun etc.. Fact is no one will touch Ireland so when the loan offer came in we took it. Looking at it now, quite rightly, Petrov is first choice along with Herd. Who would have thought 3 months ago that Herd would keep our future stars Bannan & Delph out of the team? Shows how short we are of players that are up to playing every week in the Premiership.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: KRS on December 17, 2011, 07:30:37 PM
Sometimes you just have to accept that a manager or coaching staff dont think a player is or will be good enough. I would have liked Makoun to be a successful signing, but I just dont see him being good enough for the Aston Villa in the Premier League and he's shown very little in his limited performances to suggest otherwise. Obviously the staff get to see him in training every day, so if he's not fitting in or showing to be of high enough standard then the best option is to remove him from the wage bill.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: frankmosswasmyuncle on December 17, 2011, 07:59:30 PM
I think we will sign  acouple of top names in January and than push on for a CL place ;D

I think we might sign an average journeyman and push on for a top 16 place ;D
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: KevinGage on December 17, 2011, 08:08:13 PM
I've seen enough from Makoun to think he could be a success here.

Against Man U away he was our best player and against Fulham at home I was very impressed.  Good range of short and medium range passing, excellent close control and he could pass with a bit of imagination too, not always playing the obvious ball.

Downing and maybe Ash apart that day, he made the rest of our players look pedestrian.  Even in the games later into the season when he looked off the pace and was far less  effective, he was still able to provide that potentially match winning pass to Bent. As per Newcastle at home.   The obvious issues for him were his tackling and fitness, as he had been in and out of the Lyon side for a while.  And the pace of the English game is a notch or two above that of most other leagues anyway. Maybe he'd been playing on adrenaline initially, the big move/ new club syndrome. 

Not defending him, as I think professionals should just get on with it, but he did join at a difficult time lets face it. A few matches in and Villa fans were calling for Houlliers head.  If he already found the move difficult those kind of things can't have helped. We don't know if he had problems re his family settling and so forth too.

But purely based on ability, I think he had/ has more than enough to be a success at Villa.   Providing he times his tackles better or is told not to lunge in at all, to just stay on his feet and jockey opposition players out of it.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: frankmosswasmyuncle on December 17, 2011, 08:21:43 PM
Bloody good assessment KG. Thought he had a really rough deal. He's obviously got some class and needs the chance to show it. He could be the very thing we miss in midfield!
As good as, probably better than Davis!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ROBBO on December 17, 2011, 10:22:44 PM
Makoun was bought by a manager who was trying to change the playing style of the team, keeping the ball on the ground, keeping posession and finding space, he was probably more skilfull at this than any other in the team. This i believe is the way we would like Villa to play, unfortunately if you go through his managerial career Mcleish is a poor mans Martin Oneill,his teams have always played the old fashioned typically seventies football with a fair bit of hoofing involved.Lerner missed a golden chance by not retaining Houllier not in the managers role but as backroom support to a younger manager who had the same vision of the way the game should be played. With AM we have gone back to the future.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on December 17, 2011, 11:11:16 PM
While I think you are correct Robbo about what GH was trying to do by signing players like Makoun I also think his larger plan was to completely tear up the current squad. It would have constituted wholesale changes, in and out. I'm certain that other Makoun type players would have been bought along with supporting cast members that would allow the more skillful players protection. Unfortuntely for those who supported him, he fell ill. The club saw this as an opportunity to move to a more modest approach to the next few years as they neither had the appetite or resources to support the proposed surgery.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on December 18, 2011, 01:28:59 AM
Why does taking a more modest approach involve settling for players who can't pass the ball?

Hutton, for example, is technically rubbish, yet only cost slightly less than Newcastle paid for Cabaye.

If McLeish doesn't fancy Makoun, that is his shout, nothing to do with us having to cut our cloth and ditch fancy ball passers (CNZ was hardly cheap, lest we forget).
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: KevinGage on December 18, 2011, 02:39:44 AM
Exactly Paulie.

There is no guarantee that they would have been a success in C&B,  but Cabaye, Banega at Valencia and Morgan Amalfitano at Marseille were the equivalent of one Charles N'Zogbia cost wise.

I say this as someone who wanted N'Zogbia and was never crazy about GH, but it's  possible with his knowledge of the French (and other leagues) he could have made the money given to Big Eck stretch that bit further.

I do wonder though whether the club were committed to backing GH financially and a more gradual reduction in the wage bill/ costs on general, but Houlliers illness gave them an opportunity to hire a patsy who would operate with far less. Hence they could implement savage cost cuts far quicker.

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: KevinGage on December 18, 2011, 05:04:31 AM
Collins on the way out?

 clickage (http://www.people.co.uk/sport/2011/12/18/newcastle-heading-for-a-tyne-and-wear-tug-of-war-for-aston-villa-s-james-collins-102039-23642631/)


Quote
Newcastle heading for a Tyne and Wear tug-of-war for Aston Villa's James Collins
Dec 18 2011 by Steve Bates, The People

NEWCASTLE are heading for a Tyne and Wear tug-of-war for Aston Villa defender James Collins.

Toon boss Alan Pardew is lining up a £5million January swoop for 28-year-old Welsh star Collins – but Sunderland are ready to enter the race, with Martin O’Neill hoping to snap up the centre-half for a second time.

Yet Villa chief Alex McLeish is desperate to hang on to his Wales centre-half, although he will let another defender, Shane Lowry, leave.

New Black Cats boss O’Neill signed Collins from West Ham in 2009 when he was boss at Villa Park and he is ready to pounce again for the defender who has 18 months left on his deal.

Although Collins recently spoke of his desire to extend his stay at Villa, Pardew and O’Neill believe they can tempt him to the north east.

Pardew has lost centre-back Steven Taylor for the rest of the season with a serious achilles injury and that has left Newcastle vulnerable with little top-grade defensive cover.

With money banked from the sales of Andy Carroll, Jose Enrique and Kevin Nolan, Pardew will try to persuade owner Mike Ashley to give him funds so the Toon can keep up their fine start to the campaign.

As PEOPLE SPORT reported last week, O’Neill is also keen on Spanish defender Carlos Cuellar, who is out of contract this summer and can leave Villa Park.

Yes please.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ROBBO on December 18, 2011, 05:48:09 AM
Always liked the effort Collins puts in but he is one of the hoofers i was refering to earlier. A typical MON signing, with any luck we can offload a few more to him.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Holte L2 on December 18, 2011, 07:32:17 AM
I'd be pleased we've sold Collins on the basis we play Clark. Im worried we're going to do a Cahill with Clark.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Shrek on December 18, 2011, 09:25:44 AM
Yes please, Collins is poor, sell him and play Clark all day.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: barrysleftfoot on December 18, 2011, 09:38:46 AM


  Collins....£5m, yes please.Over committed CH who gets dragged out of position too easily, and can't pass.

  Clark alongside a quick right sided CH is the future.

  Normally paulie i think you are spot on, but this constant rubbishing of Hutton is wrong.He has a good pass on him.The pass to Heskey against Heskey was the best pass of the game, who did it earlier in the season against Fulham as well.Listen hes no Alves, don't get me wrong, but for me against Swansea and Ure, i thought he kept 2 good players very quiet, and thats what i want my FBs to do,Hope he gives tart a dig today as well.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Summers on December 18, 2011, 09:52:05 AM
Collins is a juggernaut who throws himself at everything, so I'll miss him - but 5m for him is good cash. And honestly, as much as I like Collins, we NEED to have Clark in the side to help him progress. For his sake and ours.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Irish villain on December 18, 2011, 10:15:43 AM
Collins and Dunne looked decent in MON's last season at the club. However, for me, Collins has been the weak link in our side for quite some time. He's just got feck all composure and the hoofing does my head in. I've always thought Cueller was a better CB but it seems he is also on the way out.

Clark looks promising, but throwing him in at the deep end for the remainder of the season could put too much pressure on his shoulders?

We need to re-invest any money raised this window. There's too much 'patching up' going on in the side and not enough evidence of a decent team being built.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: olaftab on December 18, 2011, 10:23:53 AM
It is very depressing...not that we are not after any decent players but the fact that we no longer have players good enough to be linked with CL teams!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 18, 2011, 10:39:28 AM
Can't see Newcastle buying collins once they see his wages. MN is our best bet as he's probably got Short eating out of his hand already
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Chris Smith on December 18, 2011, 10:50:58 AM
It would be daft to sell Collins, can't see it happening.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Matt C on December 18, 2011, 11:10:24 AM
Bit presumptuous that it hasn't worked out for Makoun because the manager doesn't fancy him - perhaps he hasn't settled and as reported at the time struggled to integrate in the group, especially when the other French speakers departed (Pires, Houllier & his coaches).
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mister E on December 18, 2011, 12:37:12 PM
Who would have thought 3 months ago that Herd would keep our future stars Bannan & Delph out of the team? Shows how short we are of players that are up to playing every week in the Premiership.
Isn't that a little harsh on Herd? - he's stepped up to the plate and delivered for the team consistently this season, both at RB and CMF. Credit where it's due, he's played well and released Petrov to better things.
When McMinge wants a more expansive game, there'll be a time for BB; until then, I'm happy to see Herd in the team.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mister E on December 18, 2011, 12:41:54 PM
It would be daft to sell Collins, can't see it happening.
Well, it's difficult to see Collins going when - assuming Cuellar is on his way out - there is little likelihood of a replacement coming in.
IMO McMinge should be giving Clark more games so that he can step up permanently in the summer and have Baker as back-up. Collins can then be sold with a possible new player coming in to maintain a 4-strong CB pool.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: cheltenhamlion on December 18, 2011, 04:16:05 PM
Can we sign a decent fucking central midfielder please.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on December 18, 2011, 09:12:28 PM
I would sell Cuellar and Collins. The former is taking up wages never playing and the latter is fucking shit. Buy a centre half who can defend. A 22 year old Samba would be nice. The manager has to be backed or sacked, and the players who are simply not good enough at present have to be culled.

Steven Davis for 2 million quid is not the answer.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithesShin on December 18, 2011, 09:15:38 PM
23 year old Samba cost Blackburn £450,000. Why do we never seem to manage deals like that anymore?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on December 19, 2011, 12:19:18 AM
I would sell Cuellar and Collins. The former is taking up wages never playing and the latter is fucking shit. Buy a centre half who can defend. A 22 year old Samba would be nice. The manager has to be backed or sacked, and the players who are simply not good enough at present have to be culled.

Steven Davis for 2 million quid is not the answer.

Well said.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Merv on December 19, 2011, 09:10:06 AM
If someone is willing to pay £5m for James Collins, we absolutely must accept that. I'd use that £££ to sign a decent central midfielder, and pair Dunne with Clark for the season, using Cuellar as cover until we release him in the summer. Baker involved as fourth choice CB.

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Irish villain on December 19, 2011, 09:18:37 AM
23 year old Samba cost Blackburn £450,000. Why do we never seem to manage deals like that anymore?

Mark Delaney is the last one I can remember.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: N'ZMAV on December 19, 2011, 10:38:04 AM
I would cash in on Ireland, Delph and Cuellar ASAP.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Chris Smith on December 19, 2011, 10:41:27 AM
23 year old Samba cost Blackburn £450,000. Why do we never seem to manage deals like that anymore?

Mark Delaney is the last one I can remember.

Let's hoe Edna turns out to be as good.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on December 19, 2011, 10:45:29 AM
It would be daft to sell Collins, can't see it happening.

I'm always a little bemused by the Collins bashing that goes on on here.  Not a world beater, but a decent player and good value for the £5m we payed for him!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on December 19, 2011, 11:06:53 AM
It would be daft to sell Collins, can't see it happening.

I'm always a little bemused by the Collins bashing that goes on on here.  Not a world beater, but a decent player and good value for the £5m we payed for him!

He's looked less than decent for most of this season. In fact, he has looked utterly rubbish.

Take a look at him wandering around the area cluelessly for Liverpool's first, for an example.

He's also the absolute worst at the "hoof it upfield, anywhere" thing we do so much.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Irish villain on December 19, 2011, 11:11:58 AM
23 year old Samba cost Blackburn £450,000. Why do we never seem to manage deals like that anymore?

Mark Delaney is the last one I can remember.

Let's hoe Edna turns out to be as good.

Looking forward to Enda coming in!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on December 19, 2011, 11:12:51 AM
I've made this point before, but the lack of movement from our midfield is the main reason for that more than the man on the ball.

We do seem to lack proper organisation back there, but he'll also make a few good interceptions and blocks during the game aswell.  Like I said - not a world beater, but better then he's made out to be by some!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: brontebilly on December 19, 2011, 11:28:23 AM
I would cash in on Ireland, Delph and Cuellar ASAP.

you wouldnt get much cash for those three.

When Ireland left City he demanded a serious pay out. I can see the same happening again when he leaves us.

id much prefer we gave him a run of games in the first team. Even as an audition for a transfer elsewhere.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Chris Smith on December 19, 2011, 11:43:35 AM
It would be daft to sell Collins, can't see it happening.

I'm always a little bemused by the Collins bashing that goes on on here.  Not a world beater, but a decent player and good value for the £5m we payed for him!

He's looked less than decent for most of this season. In fact, he has looked utterly rubbish.

Take a look at him wandering around the area cluelessly for Liverpool's first, for an example.

He's also the absolute worst at the "hoof it upfield, anywhere" thing we do so much.

He is what he is. Like all players he makes mistakes but he's nowhere near as bad as you're making out. In the last 3 games we'd defended well and he'd played a full part, yesterday we conceded 2 poor goals so they deserve criticism for that but equally deserve credit for previous performances.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Chris Smith on December 19, 2011, 11:45:16 AM
23 year old Samba cost Blackburn £450,000. Why do we never seem to manage deals like that anymore?

Mark Delaney is the last one I can remember.

Let's hoe Edna turns out to be as good.

Looking forward to Enda coming in!

Do you know much about him, IV? What should we expect?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on December 19, 2011, 12:01:58 PM
Collins had something in his first season here but that's evaporated. He now suffers from the worst affliction a centre half can suffer from; indecision. Its fatal in this league as any mistakes are punished. It's time to put Clark in and stick with him for a while. He has far more potential so we may as well see if he can do it.

There's no way Collins can justify his place on form in my opinion and McLeish said he'd change it. Well, change it then.

Unfortunately the entire defence apart from sporadic performances from Dunne is weak and we have little option to change it around.
Failing that, a galvanizing spirit could help but it seems these players have very little zest for a fight under this manager.
It's clear he doesn't believe we can compete with the likes of Liverpool at Villa Park or Spurs at White Hart Lane and so on and his players obviously agree.

At least that jerk who left us in the lurch could conjure some sort of spirit and motivation. It's terminally flat at Villa right now and a bit of gusto can compensate for a lack of ability. Can we expect some any time soon?
It's just not working and although it's not all his fault as it was beyond him from the begining, its has to be shaken up.

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: DB on December 19, 2011, 12:34:15 PM
Collins had something in his first season here but that's evaporated. He now suffers from the worst affliction a centre half can suffer from; indecision. Its fatal in this league as any mistakes are punished. It's time to put Clark in and stick with him for a while. He has far more potential so we may as well see if he can do it.

There's no way Collins can justify his place on form in my opinion and McLeish said he'd change it. Well, change it then.

Unfortunately the entire defence apart from sporadic performances from Dunne is weak and we have little option to change it around.
Failing that, a galvanizing spirit could help but it seems these players have very little zest for a fight under this manager.
It's clear he doesn't believe we can compete with the likes of Liverpool at Villa Park or Spurs at White Hart Lane and so on and his players obviously agree.

At least that jerk who left us in the lurch could conjure some sort of spirit and motivation. It's terminally flat at Villa right now and a bit of gusto can compensate for a lack of ability. Can we expect some any time soon?
It's just not working and although it's not all his fault as it was beyond him from the begining, its has to be shaken up.



Totally agree re Collins. Since Carlos was shunted to full-back he doesn't even get considered for a CB role, looks like he's on his way but he's got to be worth a go to replace Collins.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: achilles on December 19, 2011, 12:44:17 PM
Collins had something in his first season here but that's evaporated. He now suffers from the worst affliction a centre half can suffer from; indecision. Its fatal in this league as any mistakes are punished. It's time to put Clark in and stick with him for a while. He has far more potential so we may as well see if he can do it.

There's no way Collins can justify his place on form in my opinion and McLeish said he'd change it. Well, change it then.

Unfortunately the entire defence apart from sporadic performances from Dunne is weak and we have little option to change it around.
Failing that, a galvanizing spirit could help but it seems these players have very little zest for a fight under this manager.
It's clear he doesn't believe we can compete with the likes of Liverpool at Villa Park or Spurs at White Hart Lane and so on and his players obviously agree.

At least that jerk who left us in the lurch could conjure some sort of spirit and motivation. It's terminally flat at Villa right now and a bit of gusto can compensate for a lack of ability. Can we expect some any time soon?
It's just not working and although it's not all his fault as it was beyond him from the begining, its has to be shaken up.


To me this is the crux of the matter, as I really don't think our defenders are as bad as they are trying to show at the moment!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 19, 2011, 02:08:10 PM
Ozzjim mentioned it on another thread and i have to say i agree. Man for man we've now got a worse squad than DOL's, there's certainly less fight in some of the players. Even taking out the few pearl's MON signed its probably the worse return on 80m evoh.

Thing is i'm not sure i want AM spending anymore money to add to the disaster but you have to back him or sack him. And if you did sack him, who would trust Lerner not to employ another hoof merchant? Hard to work out what's the least bad option really?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on December 19, 2011, 02:20:28 PM
I think the £80m thing is misleading.  What did that team that played Sunday actually cost?

Guzan - £250k from memory
Hutton - £4m
Dunne & Collins - £5m each
Warnock - £7m
Petrov - £6m
Delph - £7m
N'Zogbia - £10m
Heskey - £3.5m
Marc & the Fonz - youth products

So that's £47.75m.  If the first team had been fully out I'd say Bent, Gabby, Herd & Given in for Guzan, Delph, Delfouneso and Heskey, which comes out to £56.5m, if you take Bent at £16m.  An average of £5m a player then, which is hardly dramatic in today's world.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JUAN PABLO on December 19, 2011, 02:27:45 PM
Bloody good assessment KG. Thought he had a really rough deal. He's obviously got some class and needs the chance to show it. He could be the very thing we miss in midfield!
As good as, probably better than Davis!

he cant be worse than what we have , Makoun I mean
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 19, 2011, 02:31:06 PM
I'll take your word for it John. My point is if you add in all the players that were signed,  and have been let go since DOL left then it does seem shocking we're roughly back where we started in terms of squad size and quality
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Walmley_Villa on December 19, 2011, 02:34:18 PM
Craig Gardener back on loan would not in any way surprise me....
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on December 19, 2011, 02:35:23 PM
I'll take your word for it John. My point is if you add in all the players that were signed,  and have been let go since DOL left then it does seem shocking we're roughly back where we started in terms of squad size and quality

Not really when you consider the biggest signings, bar Bent, have all been sold on again for profits, with that money then not being re-invested.  By that I'm thinking of the likes of Ash, Milner and Downing.  Had we just spent that money again we'd be in a much stronger position.   
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 19, 2011, 02:39:28 PM
I'll take your word for it John. My point is if you add in all the players that were signed,  and have been let go since DOL left then it does seem shocking we're roughly back where we started in terms of squad size and quality

Not really when you consider the biggest signings, bar Bent, have all been sold on again for profits, with that money then not being re-invested.  By that I'm thinking of the likes of Ash, Milner and Downing.  Had we just spent that money again we'd be in a much stronger position.   

but you're talking an original investment of what 30m in those three? Add up the other names and their cost. That's where the real money has been wasted.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JUAN PABLO on December 19, 2011, 02:39:39 PM
 Aston Villa are keen on bringing in Keith Andrews from Blackburn on a free transfer. people

Bruno Ecuele Manga is another player been mentioned in the Sunday Star
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on December 19, 2011, 02:43:19 PM
Aston Villa are keen on bringing in Keith Andrews from Blackburn on a free transfer. people

Bruno Ecuele Manga is another player been mentioned in the Sunday Star

If the top one is true, we may as well give up.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Chris Jameson on December 19, 2011, 02:47:00 PM
Not had a read through this thread but has the possibility of taking Kieron Dyer on loan for the rest of the season from QPR been mentioned?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JUAN PABLO on December 19, 2011, 02:47:16 PM
GHOU has seriously lost it since his illness

Gerard Houllier is tipping Kenny Dalglish to take Liverpool back into the Champions League this season and win the league in 2013.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JUAN PABLO on December 19, 2011, 02:48:04 PM
Not had a read through this thread but has the possibility of taking Kieron Dyer on loan for the rest of the season from QPR been mentioned?

ha ha     very good Chris ;)
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on December 19, 2011, 02:49:30 PM
I'll take your word for it John. My point is if you add in all the players that were signed,  and have been let go since DOL left then it does seem shocking we're roughly back where we started in terms of squad size and quality

Not really when you consider the biggest signings, bar Bent, have all been sold on again for profits, with that money then not being re-invested.  By that I'm thinking of the likes of Ash, Milner and Downing.  Had we just spent that money again we'd be in a much stronger position.   

but you're talking an original investment of what 30m in those three? Add up the other names and their cost. That's where the real money has been wasted.

Not sure what point you're getting at?  I'm trying to evaluate the value of our present squad and what we should therefore be expecting from them.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: CJ on December 19, 2011, 02:50:09 PM
Aston Villa are keen on bringing in Keith Andrews from Blackburn on a free transfer. people

Bruno Ecuele Manga is another player been mentioned in the Sunday Star

If the top one is true, we may as well give up.

Absolutely. A 31 year old so poor he can't even get into a struggling Blackburn side and is on loan to Ipswich (thanks Wiki). If that's the level of player we're looking at the bar has been set at limbo level.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: peckvillajunior on December 19, 2011, 03:05:42 PM
Kris Boyd has apparently released himself from his contract with the Turkish club he was at. Wouldn't be massively surpirsed if we made a move
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: timeoutbigbar on December 19, 2011, 03:17:22 PM
Craig Gardener back on loan would not in any way surprise me....

I'd hate to see that c*nt wearing our shirt again.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TheSandman on December 19, 2011, 03:27:51 PM
Not even McLeish would be daft enough to sign Boyd and Andrews. Both are terrible.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 19, 2011, 04:11:31 PM
I'll take your word for it John. My point is if you add in all the players that were signed,  and have been let go since DOL left then it does seem shocking we're roughly back where we started in terms of squad size and quality

Not really when you consider the biggest signings, bar Bent, have all been sold on again for profits, with that money then not being re-invested.  By that I'm thinking of the likes of Ash, Milner and Downing.  Had we just spent that money again we'd be in a much stronger position.   

but you're talking an original investment of what 30m in those three? Add up the other names and their cost. That's where the real money has been wasted.

Not sure what point you're getting at?  I'm trying to evaluate the value of our present squad and what we should therefore be expecting from them.

the point i'm getting at is in the short space of time from the end of DOL's reign to currently, many many millions has been invested in players and wages and we're not much better off for it, if at all. just the money spent on Davies, Sidwell, Warnock, Heskey, MFH,  and Makoun, about 30m, would probably supply a first team for one of our rivals in the mediocrity league. And you could name another 6 players bought during that time that cost similar that were as pointless. And probably another 6.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulMcGrathsNo5Shirt on December 19, 2011, 04:21:56 PM
Bent to QPR
Cuellar to Rangers with Davis coming the other way.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JJ-AV on December 19, 2011, 04:23:29 PM
Bent to QPR
Cuellar to Rangers with Davis coming the other way.

I can see Bent going to QPR. Perhaps Liverpool too if they can shift Carrol.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on December 19, 2011, 04:32:37 PM
I'll take your word for it John. My point is if you add in all the players that were signed,  and have been let go since DOL left then it does seem shocking we're roughly back where we started in terms of squad size and quality

Not really when you consider the biggest signings, bar Bent, have all been sold on again for profits, with that money then not being re-invested.  By that I'm thinking of the likes of Ash, Milner and Downing.  Had we just spent that money again we'd be in a much stronger position.   

but you're talking an original investment of what 30m in those three? Add up the other names and their cost. That's where the real money has been wasted.

Not sure what point you're getting at?  I'm trying to evaluate the value of our present squad and what we should therefore be expecting from them.

the point i'm getting at is in the short space of time from the end of DOL's reign to currently, many many millions has been invested in players and wages and we're not much better off for it, if at all. just the money spent on Davies, Sidwell, Warnock, Heskey, MFH,  and Makoun, about 30m, would probably supply a first team for one of our rivals in the mediocrity league. And you could name another 6 players bought during that time that cost similar that were as pointless. And probably another 6.

But there's been a lot recouped aswell.  Of course not everything was spent well, but I'd argue that the essential signings simply to stay in the division have got to be £5-£10m a year anyway.  And £30m for a PL first team is relegation guaranteed, IMO.

But then we can argue the pros and cons of the signings for ages, the balance of those sold is best seen when you look and who's left and what they cost.  Come to your own conclusions about their worth compared to the cost, but the cost is greatlt diminished from what has been spent, due to the sales.       
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: fredm on December 19, 2011, 04:53:17 PM
Bent to QPR
Cuellar to Rangers with Davis coming the other way.

I can see Bent going to QPR. Perhaps Liverpool too if they can shift Carrol.

Would AM consider swapping Bent for Carroll?  He likes a big target man and I wouldn't be surprised to see Dalglish try and move him out.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: luke25 on December 19, 2011, 05:08:45 PM
I'd like us to get Jordan Rhodes from Huddersfield, the guy has it all to succeed at a higher level, big, strong, pace and the most impressive thing about him is his finishing is fantastic, granted I know that a striker is the least of our needs but I believe this guy is going to go on to big things and I may be out of touch with how much young strikers from league 1 cost but maybe £2m would get him.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 19, 2011, 05:11:56 PM
I'll take your word for it John. My point is if you add in all the players that were signed,  and have been let go since DOL left then it does seem shocking we're roughly back where we started in terms of squad size and quality

Not really when you consider the biggest signings, bar Bent, have all been sold on again for profits, with that money then not being re-invested.  By that I'm thinking of the likes of Ash, Milner and Downing.  Had we just spent that money again we'd be in a much stronger position.   

but you're talking an original investment of what 30m in those three? Add up the other names and their cost. That's where the real money has been wasted.

Not sure what point you're getting at?  I'm trying to evaluate the value of our present squad and what we should therefore be expecting from them.

the point i'm getting at is in the short space of time from the end of DOL's reign to currently, many many millions has been invested in players and wages and we're not much better off for it, if at all. just the money spent on Davies, Sidwell, Warnock, Heskey, MFH,  and Makoun, about 30m, would probably supply a first team for one of our rivals in the mediocrity league. And you could name another 6 players bought during that time that cost similar that were as pointless. And probably another 6.

But there's been a lot recouped aswell.  Of course not everything was spent well, but I'd argue that the essential signings simply to stay in the division have got to be £5-£10m a year anyway. And £30m for a PL first team is relegation guaranteed, IMO.

But then we can argue the pros and cons of the signings for ages, the balance of those sold is best seen when you look and who's left and what they cost.  Come to your own conclusions about their worth compared to the cost, but the cost is greatlt diminished from what has been spent, due to the sales.       

you reckon? I'd be willing to bet the likes of Swansea and Norwich haven't spent that much on their whole squad and i think both of them will survive this season
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on December 19, 2011, 07:03:14 PM
I reckon he would jump at Carroll for Bent, but can't see it happening. Mind you Carroll and Gabby might gel quite well in the world of HOOOOF!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: hipkiss92 on December 19, 2011, 07:08:16 PM
I'd like us to get Jordan Rhodes from Huddersfield, the guy has it all to succeed at a higher level, big, strong, pace and the most impressive thing about him is his finishing is fantastic, granted I know that a striker is the least of our needs but I believe this guy is going to go on to big things and I may be out of touch with how much young strikers from league 1 cost but maybe £2m would get him.

Agree entirely about Rhodes, also think we should try to pick up Clyne from Palace, and Butterfield who we have been linked with in the Mirror seems quite impressive. If we've got to cut expenses, then getting in young, hungry talented players from the lower leagues seems a good place to start, will hopefully help us turn a profit in the future as well.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on December 19, 2011, 07:12:41 PM
Aidrian Durham asked if we had a direction/ policy in the transfer market and I just don't think we do. I think we need a DOF, with the owners we have I think it would actually work quite well. Under GH there was a plan. I agree with the above, and think 10 million a season should be put aside for U23 players from around the leagues. It would pay off handsomely in the future given the propper scouting.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Matt C on December 19, 2011, 09:31:27 PM
Kris Boyd now without a club and available on a free. Just saying...
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Clampy on December 19, 2011, 09:32:37 PM
Kris Boyd now without a club and available on a free. Just saying...

Would'nt surprise me if he went back to Rangers.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 20, 2011, 12:02:48 AM
we need cover up front certainly. we're toothless if bent or gabby are unavailable. Fonz isn't good enough and i doubt he ever will be. I'm obviously not including Heskey as a striker for obvious reasons.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on December 20, 2011, 01:32:37 AM
we need cover up front certainly. we're toothless if bent or gabby are unavailable. Fonz isn't good enough and i doubt he ever will be. I'm obviously not including Heskey as a striker for obvious reasons.

Barn door, can't hit. Really have to get Heskey off the books ASAP. 60k a week for being a total waster. I think we need 2 forwards to make us more complete squad wise, a true target man that can get goals, and a number 10, that can drop between the front and create something. We then also need another winger of quality, a top central midfield player, a Samba like centre back, a right back, and a manager. I reckon scout em on Football Manager, get a DOF in charge of transfers and get buying/ selling. We need Arry in wheeler dealer mode.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: KevinGage on December 20, 2011, 02:37:28 AM
On the subject of Ivanhoe, I have to admit this made me laugh:


 New Heskey (http://www.mirrorfootball.co.uk/news/Sunderland-striker-Connor-Wickham-can-be-next-Emile-Heskey-says-Martin-O-Neill-article844211.html)



Quote
He believes Wickham has the talent and physique to fulfil the role Heskey played for him at Villa.

O’Neill said: “Without a doubt that would be nice. Connor has excellent natural ability. He is not just a sizeable centre forward up there for the sake of it."


Natural ability, not just up front for the sake of it. 

In other words, nothing like Ivanhoe at all then.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dante Lavelli on December 20, 2011, 03:43:16 AM
I'd like us to get Jordan Rhodes from Huddersfield, the guy has it all to succeed at a higher level, big, strong, pace and the most impressive thing about him is his finishing is fantastic, granted I know that a striker is the least of our needs but I believe this guy is going to go on to big things and I may be out of touch with how much young strikers from league 1 cost but maybe £2m would get him.

Agree entirely about Rhodes, also think we should try to pick up Clyne from Palace, and Butterfield who we have been linked with in the Mirror seems quite impressive. If we've got to cut expenses, then getting in young, hungry talented players from the lower leagues seems a good place to start, will hopefully help us turn a profit in the future as well.

I agree.  I think a bit of a legacy of the MON era is that we signed a fair number of players who had "made it", at least from a financial sense, so their motivation is not what it could be.  This problem is amplified because the guy that signed them has fucked off. 

A good splattering of promising youngsters should increase the squad's determination in training and willingness to listen to the coach's instructions even if they do not break into the first team themselves.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on December 20, 2011, 06:39:07 AM
I'd like us to get Jordan Rhodes from Huddersfield, the guy has it all to succeed at a higher level, big, strong, pace and the most impressive thing about him is his finishing is fantastic, granted I know that a striker is the least of our needs but I believe this guy is going to go on to big things and I may be out of touch with how much young strikers from league 1 cost but maybe £2m would get him.

Agree entirely about Rhodes, also think we should try to pick up Clyne from Palace, and Butterfield who we have been linked with in the Mirror seems quite impressive. If we've got to cut expenses, then getting in young, hungry talented players from the lower leagues seems a good place to start, will hopefully help us turn a profit in the future as well.

I agree.  I think a bit of a legacy of the MON era is that we signed a fair number of players who had "made it", at least from a financial sense, so their motivation is not what it could be.  This problem is amplified because the guy that signed them has fucked off. 

A good splattering of promising youngsters should increase the squad's determination in training and willingness to listen to the coach's instructions even if they do not break into the first team themselves.

I was chatting to my dad about this yesterday and looking at the blues squad last season and ours, the older players for them had been rescued by Mcleish and owed him performances. This was mixed with hunger from players signed either on loan from top sides wanting to get games, or calculated gambles from the championship. None of our senior pros owe McLeish anything really, Hutton aside, and the youngsters are not getting consistent enough runs in the side to form confidence or understanding of their role, short of Herd and Delph, the latter of whom for me needs 6 months in the Championship with a decent side that uses the ball well to get his mojo back.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: charlie on December 20, 2011, 08:40:13 AM
Indeed the players who put bodies on the line, Dunne, Collins etc are no longer interested. we dont have a Barry ferguson, but even with ''owing eck''players who fought for him the noses still went down,......... with disinterested high earners who effectively blight the rest we arrive quickly at apathy. As posted elsewhere we have seen poor scottish manager plus apathy=relegation in the 80s, and whatever is said in his defence eck is a poor manager. Time to go. [and Hutton may owe him but he is dire].
Pride swallowing time is suggested...sparky welshmen come to mind.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulTheVillan on December 20, 2011, 08:46:21 AM
I would consider decent bids for all of our current squad. Fed up of all of them.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Irish villain on December 20, 2011, 08:59:04 AM
Ozzjim mentioned it on another thread and i have to say i agree. Man for man we've now got a worse squad than DOL's, there's certainly less fight in some of the players. Even taking out the few pearl's MON signed its probably the worse return on 80m evoh.

Thing is i'm not sure i want AM spending anymore money to add to the disaster but you have to back him or sack him. And if you did sack him, who would trust Lerner not to employ another hoof merchant? Hard to work out what's the least bad option really?

This post sums things up quite well. Two years ago we were all so convinced we had the best owners any club could have we thought we'd replace MON with a much better manager who wouldn't make so many frustrating mistakes.

Now, after Houllier, McLeish and an unbelievable level of austerity and silence, none of us know what to think/hope for. Awful state of affairs.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 20, 2011, 09:51:43 AM
says we are going to sign darren gibson on loan in the mail and mentions Diame again
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on December 20, 2011, 09:59:56 AM
The only thing Gibson can do is hit the very occasional screamer and that's it. Not good enough.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JUAN PABLO on December 20, 2011, 10:01:37 AM
says we are going to sign darren gibson on loan in the mail and mentions Diame again

The thing is Greg , you know Gibson could happen .  ffs
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Matt C on December 20, 2011, 10:13:02 AM
You have to wonder about Gibson when he's still not getting near the Man Ure first team despite all their recent injuries.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on December 20, 2011, 10:29:14 AM
Diame would be a good signing and weaken wigan
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on December 20, 2011, 10:38:04 AM
You have to wonder about Gibson when he's still not getting near the Man Ure first team despite all their recent injuries.


has not been registered otherwise would be playing apparently.

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Chris Smith on December 20, 2011, 11:18:22 AM
The only thing Gibson can do is hit the very occasional screamer and that's it. Not good enough.

I think there's more to him than that. Can pass a ball and gets about the pitch. Not top class but coud do a job for us for a few months in an area of the pitch where we need additions. A lad at work told me ths would happen a couple of weeks ago.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mister E on December 20, 2011, 11:49:00 AM
The only thing Gibson can do is hit the very occasional screamer and that's it. Not good enough.

I think there's more to him than that. Can pass a ball and gets about the pitch. Not top class but coud do a job for us for a few months in an area of the pitch where we need additions. A lad at work told me ths would happen a couple of weeks ago.
Well, get Gardner (Snr) and the Hitz back and we'd have three beastly howitzers in midfield ... not that I'd like any of them.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Merv on December 20, 2011, 12:00:10 PM
We may as well be realistic in January. I can't see us landing a big signing. Midfield definitely needs strengthening as we're now down effectively two players - Jenas and Ireland, who appears to have melted away into the ether again, absences from the squad being explained as 'he's ill'.

Gibson's okay. Chris is right, he's a decent passer of the ball and we all know he's got a good shot on him - I wouldn't mind seeing a bit of that from midfield, only Petrov has contributed like that this season. He might just be a lad who needs to play regular football to get the best out of him. A six-month loan deal... can't lose really. Probably have the chance to sign him permanently in the summer if he impresses.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Clampy on December 20, 2011, 12:02:50 PM
Darren Gibson is another Wolves type signing and he's not even that experienced either.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on December 20, 2011, 12:22:47 PM
I think I'd take a punt on Gibson if the money is not there for better.  But we've played the last two games in a 4-4-2 and I wouldn't put him in ahead of either Stan or Herd.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on December 20, 2011, 12:47:49 PM
I think if you sign Gibson and Diame you have natural competition for Petrov and Herd straight away, but Ireland would then have to go (lets face it you could probably get the first 2 for his wages) and Delph for me would need a loan spell. It would also mean Herd might be deployed at right back, and a return to a 3 man midfield with Gabby, NZog and Bent. Certainly gives options, although I would ideally want a better player than Gibson. Can he take corners?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on December 20, 2011, 01:46:41 PM
Surely Montgommery and Numan can come up with some up and coming talent on the continent rather than buying known substandard rubbish?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TheSandman on December 20, 2011, 01:49:58 PM
I reckon we will use our special relationship with Sir Alex to prize some talent away from Old Trafford. I mean, after all he has done for the game at a giant of the game it's only fair for  us to take sub-standard shit like Gibson and Evans off his hands. We'll be the new Sunderland!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: garyshawsknee on December 20, 2011, 01:59:22 PM
Don't you mean the old Sunderland?!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on December 20, 2011, 02:19:40 PM
I just don't see the point of bringing Gibson in, who is moderate at best. We have Gardner out on loan, we may as well give him a chance.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on December 20, 2011, 02:22:02 PM
I just don't see the point of bringing Gibson in, who is moderate at best. We have Gardner out on loan, we may as well give him a chance.

I think it was right to send GG out on loan, but having seen some of the stuff going on at Coventry (I had no idea it was so bad), I wonder how sending him there is going to affect him.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on December 20, 2011, 02:24:44 PM
I just don't see the point of bringing Gibson in, who is moderate at best. We have Gardner out on loan, we may as well give him a chance.

I think it was right to send GG out on loan, but having seen some of the stuff going on at Coventry (I had no idea it was so bad), I wonder how sending him there is going to affect him.

Oh I agree it was right to do it at the time. I'm more looking at January, I can't see why we should bring in Gibson rather than give Gardner a chance.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: avfc_1874 on December 20, 2011, 05:32:45 PM
You'd have thought we'd have learnt our lesson from the signing of Djemba Djemba to never sign any of Man U's rejects
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dave Cooper please on December 20, 2011, 05:34:15 PM
You'd have thought we'd have learnt our lesson from the signing of Djemba Djemba to never sign any of Man U's rejects

Paul McGrath.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Boz on December 20, 2011, 05:50:46 PM
I think we can bank on McLose to find another spectacular old favorite from somewhere North of the border similar to Hutton or even from the Sty.

If we're headed for the lower league, we may as well get a squad capable of playing a lower level of football.  ::)
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Nirog72 on December 20, 2011, 07:58:56 PM
It wouldn't solve our immediate problems but wouldn't it ne nice to be at least linked to some really young promising players like the 16 year old from Wycombe and the Irish lad that Liverpool, Everton and Swansea have signed or been linked to today. If we are trying this 'not spending much' game you would have thought we would be first in the queue for this kind of opportunity. When was the last time we picked up a really promising 16 year old from another club, Gareth Barry? I know they don't always or even often work but surely we should be competing. Brendan Rogers at Swansea clearly thinks he can compete with 'The Mighty Reds YNWA' for the Irish lad - maybe we saw a big club was in for him and gave up.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: philsheard on December 20, 2011, 08:47:22 PM
Andy Blair reckons we are signing Craig Gardner, Steven Davis and Keith Andrews!!!!! God help us if that is true.....
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: tarzansbrother on December 20, 2011, 08:52:57 PM
Quite like the idea of Steven Davis especially for the reported fee of £2m. Craig "gargoyle" Gardner can feck right off.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: philsheard on December 20, 2011, 08:56:48 PM
I was disappointed when Davis was sold under MON as I thought he had the ability to go on and be a big player. Will be interesting to see how he's developed north of the border and whether he can cut it back in England. Not sure about Keith Andrews. I know he plays for ROI but if he cant get into that Blackburn team then how can he be good enough for us?

And yes, C. Gardner can feck right off! 
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on December 20, 2011, 08:58:35 PM
Keith Andrews is utter rubbish, and quite old. Absolutely 100% no. I'm not keen on Davis coming back, but Andrews is a whole other level of no thanks.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Karlos96 on December 20, 2011, 08:59:41 PM
If that's the kind of player we're looking to sign we might as well give up.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mister E on December 20, 2011, 09:02:51 PM
Andy Blair reckons we are signing Craig Gardner, Steven Davis and Keith Andrews!!!!! God help us if that is true.....
Has Andy Blair succumbed to Alzeimers already?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: philsheard on December 20, 2011, 09:06:55 PM
more to the point, if its true, who at Villa is approving these buys???
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on December 20, 2011, 09:10:06 PM
Keith Andrews is utter shite. I can't believe any top flight club would be interested in him.

Gardner, I would have thought, has burned his bridges. Davis I didnt think that much of when we sold him in the first place.

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: KRS on December 20, 2011, 09:14:18 PM
Who is Keith Andrews? *fires up Google*

edit:
http://www.people.co.uk/sport/football/football-hotline/2011/12/18/keith-andrews-wanted-by-everton-aston-villa-bolton-and-swansea-102039-23642638/

...so we're competing with the likes of Everton, Bolton and Swansea. Sounds too familiar for my liking already.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on December 20, 2011, 09:17:05 PM
Keith Andrews is utter shite. I can't believe any top flight club would be interested in him.

Gardner, I would have thought, has burned his bridges. Davis I didnt think that much of when we sold him in the first place.



Sums up my order on things, the fact Andrews can't get in the Blackburn squad should be a clue. I don't see why we don't just use Gary Gardner rather than waste money(if we do it) on players that aren't good enough.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Chris Smith on December 20, 2011, 09:21:03 PM
It's fucking bollocks, absolutely no way will we be signing 3 central midfield players. Never trust anyone from Coventry.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Shoody on December 20, 2011, 11:12:15 PM
I dont think everybody is quite grasping that Davis wont be a squad player. A few people now have said '£2m for a squad player is good business'.

No. He will be our full time, first team choice player. We will have very little to spend at it will be going on players for the first 11. Why waste £2m on a player we produced and we know to not be any better than Bannan or Gardner? He's more experienced, but in the SPL. He is not good enough.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TaxDodger on December 20, 2011, 11:32:44 PM
I'm pretty sure won't be signing these players.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: caster troy on December 20, 2011, 11:45:21 PM
I wouldn't give McLeish £1 to spend in January, he's a dead man walking in this job and we'll just end up with more Makouns who the new manager doesn't want in July.

If he hadn't signed Hutton and N'Zogbia I might have given him the benefit of the doubt but they have been atrocious so far.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Shoody on December 20, 2011, 11:53:38 PM
I'm pretty sure won't be signing these players.

I'd be confident of Davis or Gardner (probably Davis) coming back.  As good as its going to get will be Davis, Gardner, Clyne, Diame, Hoillet all arriving. I'd be almost happy (unfortunately) with that.

Nzogbia   Gabby    Hoillet
      Bannan   Gardner
               Diame
Stevens Clark Dunne Clyne
                Given

Bench: Guzan, Albrighton, Fonz, Davis, Gardner, Baker, Lichaj

If we could get in a replacement like Samba or Dann for Dunne/Collins and somebody like Olsson at Leftback. It would be a top half team, well the 1st 11 would be good enough for Top Half. Probably 8th-13th once injuries set into the first team. And it's a shame this is being very very optimistic.

Nzogbia   Gabby    Albrighton
      Bannan   Gardner
               Diame
Olsson Clark Dann Clyne
                Given

would have to be considered a very good amount of business imo... which is unfortunate. Replace Diame with Etienne Capoue and Olsson with somebody better than Olsson and we'd be getting somewhere.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on December 21, 2011, 01:44:07 AM
No Bent?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: luke25 on December 21, 2011, 02:04:45 AM
I wouldn't give McLeish £1 to spend in January, he's a dead man walking in this job and we'll just end up with more Makouns who the new manager doesn't want in July.

If he hadn't signed Hutton and N'Zogbia I might have given him the benefit of the doubt but they have been atrocious so far.
The thing is the majority of us wanted N'zogbia and were extremely happy when we signed him, including me, I'm not writing him off yet as theres a bloody good player in there, Hutton on the other hand....
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: KevinGage on December 21, 2011, 07:03:39 AM
If Keith Andrews is the answer then the question can only be 'how do we make an already pedestrian midfield look even shitter?'

Never been impressed with him, either for t'Rovers or Ireland.  Even with Irelands limited resources in midfield, he regularly comes in for stick when he plays.

I'm already on record as saying I wouldn't mind Davis back.  I never particularly wanted him to leave.  Sometimes our best/ most popular players haven't always been the greatest ability wise.  Think Paul Birch and Ian Taylor.  But what they lack in ability they make up in effort and workrate.

Davis is a busy little player, but he does actually have a degree of quality in the final third too.  Unlike someone like NRC who was all effort, but pretty limited as a footballer. Stevo can pick a pass and get a shot off.  Again, perhaps not one to build a side around. And not the sole answer to our issues in midfield.  But in the short term -and for the price mooted-  good business.  And in the medium/ long term a very useful squaddie if we can get better. 
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on December 21, 2011, 07:08:32 AM
Last night there was this bloke in midfield for Bolton who battled, tackled and ran his guts out to the last kick of the game. We miss him.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: KevinGage on December 21, 2011, 07:13:26 AM
Agreed ozzjim.

Every side needs a player like NRC.

It's just that the better ones can afford to get a guy who has the qualities he possesses and  a bit of technical ability too.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: brontebilly on December 21, 2011, 07:29:49 AM
fucking hell this is one depressing thread.

Ive seen a lot of Andrews and Gibson playing for Ireland. They pretty much compete for the right to partner Glenn Whelan in the midfield. Yikes, there was a time when Keane, Townsend and Sheridan were the three man midfield.

Anyway, Gibson does have a good shot and is a good passer of the ball. He can play it long and short and with regular football will develop this side of his game more. However without the ball he is a joke. Despite giving the appearance of an athletic physical player he is anything but. One paced in the extreme and very little presence to speak of. Probably a bit similar to Makoun actually. Reckon some team might take a punt and he will do ok for them but surely we should be aiming a bit higher. Considering our predicament I dont think he is a worthwhile punt as we need players who can come into the team straight away. He has been scratching his arse for months and will definitely need time to come up to speed.

Andrews is a late developer. He really struggled at Blackburn but is flying now at Ipswich. He has done well for Ireland in games where we have to defend. He is a good athlete and competes well. He also breaks into the box well. However with the ball he is incredibly limited. At his age surely a no go there.

Davis is a bit lightweight. Dont watch SPL but apparently he is the best midfielder there by a distance. Watched the last old scum derby and he was by a long way the best player on the park. Young, lively, good on the ball. Id worry about him in a 2 man midfield though. I liked him at Villa and considering shit like Sidwell were bought later, it was madness to sell him imo.

Craig Gardner was muck at Villa imo. I know he wasnt played in his right position a lot of the time but he is incredibly limited on the ball. Good bit of presence about him and a goal threat for sure but for the money they will need to sell him its not good value. MON rates him anyway so Id say he will stay put.

To be honest I think Herd and Petrov for what we need now are better than any of those. We definitely need a central midfielder but we need one with presence imo.

No matter how he is playing this season for Bolton, Reo Coker is a big loss for us.

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Holte L2 on December 21, 2011, 07:30:12 AM
NRC made all the difference to our midfield last season. Particuarly wheb we played 4 5 1. Made us harder to break down. I'd re-sign him tomorrow if we could.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: LeeB on December 21, 2011, 07:43:20 AM
fucking hell this is one depressing thread.

Ive seen a lot of Andrews and Gibson playing for Ireland. They pretty much compete for the right to partner Glenn Whelan in the midfield. Yikes, there was a time when Keane, Townsend and Sheridan were the three man midfield.

Anyway, Gibson does have a good shot and is a good passer of the ball. He can play it long and short and with regular football will develop this side of his game more. However without the ball he is a joke. Despite giving the appearance of an athletic physical player he is anything but. One paced in the extreme and very little presence to speak of. Probably a bit similar to Makoun actually. Reckon some team might take a punt and he will do ok for them but surely we should be aiming a bit higher. Considering our predicament I dont think he is a worthwhile punt as we need players who can come into the team straight away. He has been scratching his arse for months and will definitely need time to come up to speed.

Andrews is a late developer. He really struggled at Blackburn but is flying now at Ipswich. He has done well for Ireland in games where we have to defend. He is a good athlete and competes well. He also breaks into the box well. However with the ball he is incredibly limited. At his age surely a no go there.

Davis is a bit lightweight. Dont watch SPL but apparently he is the best midfielder there by a distance. Watched the last old scum derby and he was by a long way the best player on the park. Young, lively, good on the ball. Id worry about him in a 2 man midfield though. I liked him at Villa and considering shit like Sidwell were bought later, it was madness to sell him imo.

Craig Gardner was muck at Villa imo. I know he wasnt played in his right position a lot of the time but he is incredibly limited on the ball. Good bit of presence about him and a goal threat for sure but for the money they will need to sell him its not good value. MON rates him anyway so Id say he will stay put.

To be honest I think Herd and Petrov for what we need now are better than any of those. We definitely need a central midfielder but we need one with presence imo.

No matter how he is playing this season for Bolton, Reo Coker is a big loss for us.



You say Andrews and Gardner are limited on the ball, then wish we still had Reo-Coker?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: brontebilly on December 21, 2011, 08:22:15 AM
fucking hell this is one depressing thread.

Ive seen a lot of Andrews and Gibson playing for Ireland. They pretty much compete for the right to partner Glenn Whelan in the midfield. Yikes, there was a time when Keane, Townsend and Sheridan were the three man midfield.

Anyway, Gibson does have a good shot and is a good passer of the ball. He can play it long and short and with regular football will develop this side of his game more. However without the ball he is a joke. Despite giving the appearance of an athletic physical player he is anything but. One paced in the extreme and very little presence to speak of. Probably a bit similar to Makoun actually. Reckon some team might take a punt and he will do ok for them but surely we should be aiming a bit higher. Considering our predicament I dont think he is a worthwhile punt as we need players who can come into the team straight away. He has been scratching his arse for months and will definitely need time to come up to speed.

Andrews is a late developer. He really struggled at Blackburn but is flying now at Ipswich. He has done well for Ireland in games where we have to defend. He is a good athlete and competes well. He also breaks into the box well. However with the ball he is incredibly limited. At his age surely a no go there.

Davis is a bit lightweight. Dont watch SPL but apparently he is the best midfielder there by a distance. Watched the last old scum derby and he was by a long way the best player on the park. Young, lively, good on the ball. Id worry about him in a 2 man midfield though. I liked him at Villa and considering shit like Sidwell were bought later, it was madness to sell him imo.

Craig Gardner was muck at Villa imo. I know he wasnt played in his right position a lot of the time but he is incredibly limited on the ball. Good bit of presence about him and a goal threat for sure but for the money they will need to sell him its not good value. MON rates him anyway so Id say he will stay put.

To be honest I think Herd and Petrov for what we need now are better than any of those. We definitely need a central midfielder but we need one with presence imo.

No matter how he is playing this season for Bolton, Reo Coker is a big loss for us.



You say Andrews and Gardner are limited on the ball, then wish we still had Reo-Coker?

Reo Coker is a leader, we have none in the side at the moment. Craig Gardner certainly isnt. Andrews is one at a lower level. Plus Reo Coker does far more without the ball than both of those and will cover every blade of grass on the pitch. Craig Gardner is ridiculously one paced.

Fair enough Reo Coker was badly advised not to take whatever contract Houllier offered him but in a time of great turmoil on and off the pitch we miss a leader like him. Particularly against the better sides. I can recall some brilliant performances he put in in places like Anfield and Old Trafford. Our midfield is a joke at the moment. Petrov will only get away with playing in a 2 man midfield against really shit opposition and the likes of Liverpool and Spurs just walk through us at the moment.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Ads on December 21, 2011, 08:40:05 AM
I wouldn't give McLeish £1 to spend in January, he's a dead man walking in this job and we'll just end up with more Makouns who the new manager doesn't want in July.

If he hadn't signed Hutton and N'Zogbia I might have given him the benefit of the doubt but they have been atrocious so far.

Oh that's bollocks.

N'Zogbia was the player everybody thought would be a top buy. He was excellent at Wigan and for what ever reasons, he's let McLeish and the club down badly, although there has been signs in the previous two games that he's looking more like it.

As for giving him no money, his poor start aside, he's still marshalling a diabolical midfield and a woeful back line. We need fresh players and McLeish needs to be backed and given the opportunity to make a fist of it or fail at the very least.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on December 21, 2011, 09:13:52 AM
It's also bollocks because he's not a dead man walking.

Randy bet his credibility on this appointment, and has continued to do so since (letters from Ferguson telling him what a good appointment etc). Added to that, it's going to cost us big money in compensation on top of the money we've already spaffed away on previous managers of late.

Personally, I don't think there are any circumstances under which he'd sack him, and absolutely certainly not prior to January. Those who think he is going to are kidding themselves.

Randy is probably convinced he's doing a great job and unaware of any thought to the contrary. And that's the frightening bit.

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on December 21, 2011, 09:14:33 AM
Oh, and although Hutton is absolutely crap and a piss poor signing, Given was a very good one, and CNZ will come good (and has done better of late)
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: N'ZMAV on December 21, 2011, 09:21:58 AM
I think whatever manager would have came in during the summer Given & N'Zogbia would have came in. As for Hutton, I thoguht from when i'd seen him, that he was decent, he's been worse than I thought, but who else was available that springs to mind?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: N'ZMAV on December 21, 2011, 09:26:25 AM
NRC made all the difference to our midfield last season. Particuarly wheb we played 4 5 1. Made us harder to break down. I'd re-sign him tomorrow if we could.
I'm sure we could attract someone to Villa that could play a similar role to NRC but also manage to pass the ball to our of out own players? Maybe even a forward pass?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on December 21, 2011, 09:27:31 AM
I don't know who else was available, but then again I'm not a PL manager with a network of scouts to call on ;-)

I also think it's a bit too easy to dismiss the good signings of Given and (in time) N'Zogbia, though. He made them, he gets the credit when they go well, or the stick when they go badly.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: N'ZMAV on December 21, 2011, 09:32:05 AM
I don't know who else was available, but then again I'm not a PL manager with a network of scouts to call on ;-)

I also think it's a bit too easy to dismiss the good signings of Given and (in time) N'Zogbia, though. He made them, he gets the credit when they go well, or the stick when they go badly.
the quality of N'Zogbia and Given is there for all to see. Pretty straight forward for Given. But, N'Zogbia, he needs to be found the right role in the team, it's always going to be hard to players, especially players who can play a few different positions to hit the ground running. Ashley Young, James Milner & Stewart Downing had slow starts with us.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: LeeB on December 21, 2011, 09:48:34 AM
fucking hell this is one depressing thread.

Ive seen a lot of Andrews and Gibson playing for Ireland. They pretty much compete for the right to partner Glenn Whelan in the midfield. Yikes, there was a time when Keane, Townsend and Sheridan were the three man midfield.

Anyway, Gibson does have a good shot and is a good passer of the ball. He can play it long and short and with regular football will develop this side of his game more. However without the ball he is a joke. Despite giving the appearance of an athletic physical player he is anything but. One paced in the extreme and very little presence to speak of. Probably a bit similar to Makoun actually. Reckon some team might take a punt and he will do ok for them but surely we should be aiming a bit higher. Considering our predicament I dont think he is a worthwhile punt as we need players who can come into the team straight away. He has been scratching his arse for months and will definitely need time to come up to speed.

Andrews is a late developer. He really struggled at Blackburn but is flying now at Ipswich. He has done well for Ireland in games where we have to defend. He is a good athlete and competes well. He also breaks into the box well. However with the ball he is incredibly limited. At his age surely a no go there.

Davis is a bit lightweight. Dont watch SPL but apparently he is the best midfielder there by a distance. Watched the last old scum derby and he was by a long way the best player on the park. Young, lively, good on the ball. Id worry about him in a 2 man midfield though. I liked him at Villa and considering shit like Sidwell were bought later, it was madness to sell him imo.

Craig Gardner was muck at Villa imo. I know he wasnt played in his right position a lot of the time but he is incredibly limited on the ball. Good bit of presence about him and a goal threat for sure but for the money they will need to sell him its not good value. MON rates him anyway so Id say he will stay put.

To be honest I think Herd and Petrov for what we need now are better than any of those. We definitely need a central midfielder but we need one with presence imo.

No matter how he is playing this season for Bolton, Reo Coker is a big loss for us.



You say Andrews and Gardner are limited on the ball, then wish we still had Reo-Coker?

Reo Coker is a leader, we have none in the side at the moment. Craig Gardner certainly isnt. Andrews is one at a lower level. Plus Reo Coker does far more without the ball than both of those and will cover every blade of grass on the pitch. Craig Gardner is ridiculously one paced.

Fair enough Reo Coker was badly advised not to take whatever contract Houllier offered him but in a time of great turmoil on and off the pitch we miss a leader like him. Particularly against the better sides. I can recall some brilliant performances he put in in places like Anfield and Old Trafford. Our midfield is a joke at the moment. Petrov will only get away with playing in a 2 man midfield against really shit opposition and the likes of Liverpool and Spurs just walk through us at the moment.

Reo-Coker is 'leading' Bolton into the Championship.

Of those we have loved and lost, he'd be a very long way down the list of players I'd have back. In fact, when it comes to wastes of money, he's up there with the best. And I liked him.

In hindsight we'd have been better off never signing Reo-Coker and instead giving his shirt to Gardner, who would have gained more experience and at least offers some kind of threat to the opposition goal.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: spaf on December 21, 2011, 09:49:43 AM
Quote from: Guardian
Josh McEachran has been told by Chelsea that he can go out on loan in January, in order to help his development. Aston Villa are the first club to register an interest in taking the highly rated young midfielder and Bolton Wanderers, Swansea City and Fulham are also expected to express interest.
Guardian - Aston Villa interested as Chelsea look to loan out Josh McEachran
 (http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2011/dec/20/aston-villa-chelsea-josh-mceachran)

Haven't seen much of him. He was good last pre season. But so was Albrighton. Or was it the year before that? Or the year before that?

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on December 21, 2011, 10:02:01 AM
He's a much better option than some of the players we've been linked with.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Matt C on December 21, 2011, 10:16:48 AM
Not sure I see the point of signing an 18 year old from Chelsea on loan when we could throw Gardner in and give our own young players experience rather than someone elses.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Merv on December 21, 2011, 10:46:56 AM
Just beat me to it, Matt. We have our own highly-rated teenage midfielder in Gardner, not to mention the likes of Daniel Johnson, who is knocking on the first team's door. McEachran on loan would be pretty close to pointless.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Steve R on December 21, 2011, 11:08:08 AM
Quote
Josh McEachran has been told by Chelsea that he can go out on loan in January...

If true, this really is beyond the pale.

McLeish was supposed to get more out of our senior players and develop our youth. All he has managed so far is to send our best player off to a shopping mall and take some dead weight off Spurs' wage bill.

Now he is looking to develop a youngster for Chelsea.

What does this say to our own emerging players? I'd rather see Daniel Johnson in the first team, let alone Gary Gardner.

Meanwhile, if Ciaran Clark - more than adequate in midfield - is ever given a chance, we'll probably have to dust the mould off him first.

christ on a bike.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: timeoutbigbar on December 21, 2011, 11:36:35 AM
Wonder if Hoilett/N'zonzi fancy jumping ship in Jan?  I'd take either/both of them, and I think Hoilett is in the last year of his contract.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on December 21, 2011, 11:39:25 AM
Lets not get too worked up over a rumour.  It always happens on here and 99% of them are bollocks.

McEachran is younger than Gardner, so it makes no sense to me and I reckon it's "Villa have lost a loan midfielder to injury.  Chelsea are sending a midfielder out on loan.  That's a few inches sorted - what's next on the pile?"     
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: caster troy on December 21, 2011, 12:32:11 PM
It's also bollocks because he's not a dead man walking.

Randy bet his credibility on this appointment, and has continued to do so since (letters from Ferguson telling him what a good appointment etc). Added to that, it's going to cost us big money in compensation on top of the money we've already spaffed away on previous managers of late.

Personally, I don't think there are any circumstances under which he'd sack him, and absolutely certainly not prior to January. Those who think he is going to are kidding themselves.

Randy is probably convinced he's doing a great job and unaware of any thought to the contrary. And that's the frightening bit.



I didn't say he'd be gone in January, clearly that will be too soon. But if we finish 16th-17th and our attendances drop below 30K consistently towards the end of the season he will be gone by July. I'm also factoring in a huge drop in season ticket renewals and protests/banners etc in the coming months.

He should be doing better with the players he has got. Teams like Norwich and Swansea play better football and get similar results with far worse squads. At best I'd advocate a loan signing or two but if he came to me asking for £3 million to sign Gibson I'd tell him no chance. January is a poor time to do business and I doubt there will be anyone available who we can afford that will improve the squad in any case.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: will.shilt on December 21, 2011, 12:39:50 PM
I agree about Delfouneso, is it just me or should he have been given a chance seasons ago? Sounds like he has promise, needs some more matchtime though.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Tokyo Sexwhale on December 21, 2011, 01:37:04 PM
Darren Bent to QPR according to the Daily Mirror:

http://www.mirrorfootball.co.uk/transfer-news/Transfer-gossip-exclusive-QPR-plot-shock-swoop-for-Darren-Bent-Aston-Villa-striker-in-January-article844963.html

Normally, I wouldn't give it any credence, but it's just the sort of dispiriting, soul-sapping event that seems par for the course at the Villa these days.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Ads on December 21, 2011, 01:41:23 PM
We'd want close to our money back?

Lolz.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 21, 2011, 02:59:51 PM
McEachran isn't what we need - he's too young and learning his trade like our existing young players. We need someone who knows the score  and isn't afraid to make his presence felt whether its telling Collins not to hoof it aimlessly upfield to no-one or coming back to help Dunne & Co.. when someone vaguely skillfull is running at them. A sort of Aldi version of Milner.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on December 21, 2011, 03:05:04 PM
January is a poor time to do business and I doubt there will be anyone available who we can afford that will improve the squad in any case.

I'm sure there were dozens of posts saying the same thing this time last year, right up until the time we broke our transfer record on Darren Bent.

I don't expect the same again, but it at least does put a slight 'wait and see' thought into my mind.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Clampy on December 21, 2011, 03:17:42 PM
I like what little bits i've seen of McEachran and he could make an impression like Kyle Walker did last year, but i understand the arguments about it holding back the likes of Gardner and Bannan.

As for Keith Andrews, i hope that is a joke.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Karl Bridges on December 21, 2011, 03:39:25 PM
A sort of Aldi version of Milner.

Keith Andrews????
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Clampy on December 21, 2011, 03:42:17 PM
A sort of Aldi version of Milner.

Keith Andrews????

Who would the Netto version of Milner be? Darren Gibson?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Steve R on December 21, 2011, 05:32:29 PM
Lets not get too worked up over a rumour.  It always happens on here and 99% of them are bollocks.
....

yup .. it's always worth prefacing these things with 'if true..'.

The problem is that over the last few years the trend seems to be that the worse the rumour, there more likely it is that it will come to pass.

I had a real good laugh when it was mooted that we were interested in Hutton.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: KevinGage on December 21, 2011, 05:55:44 PM
A sort of Aldi version of Milner.


Keith Andrews????

I'd sooner dig up Eamonn Andrews and scatter his bones in midfield.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on December 21, 2011, 06:20:43 PM
Darren Bent to QPR according to the Daily Mirror:

http://www.mirrorfootball.co.uk/transfer-news/Transfer-gossip-exclusive-QPR-plot-shock-swoop-for-Darren-Bent-Aston-Villa-striker-in-January-article844963.html

Normally, I wouldn't give it any credence, but it's just the sort of dispiriting, soul-sapping event that seems par for the course at the Villa these days.

To be honest why on earth would he want to go there? and the club would go into meltdown if we sold him now.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: supertom on December 21, 2011, 07:02:24 PM
Bent is offering us nothing at the moment. Not his fault. If you want the best out of him you have to keep feeding him the ball in the box. We create next to nothing at the moment.
Our midfield is that piss poor I'd be tempted to sell Bent for 25. Buy Defoe for 10-15 (probably closer to 15 knowing Arry) who offers the same threats as Bent and buy a couple of decent midfielders with the difference.
Of course that would raise a couple of problems.
1- It's McLeish buying the players.
2- Even if we sold Bent, would we get all the money back to re-invest in the squad? No we wouldn't.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SoccerHQ on December 22, 2011, 12:26:20 AM
We created plenty tonight in the first half so we keep on doing that when Bent gets in the team he'll start scoring again no problem.

I don't think the club will dare sell him in the summer unless Bent really forces the issue which I doubt.

Might be a different story in the summer though.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithesShin on December 22, 2011, 12:27:55 AM
Thing is, can we be as effective by taking someone out of midfield to accomodate  both Gabby and Bent?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: brontebilly on December 22, 2011, 01:12:44 AM
Thing is, can we be as effective by taking someone out of midfield to accomodate  both Gabby and Bent?

against a shit team maybe. Bent and Gabby isnt working when they play up front together in a 442. They get in each others way. Gabby has seven assists from outwide this season and 5 goals but tonight aside you can see he wants to be up top by himself. The service to Bent has been dire for much of the season but we cant afford him to have days like Bolton where he missed 2 sitters and adds nothing else to the play.

We definitely cant get away with Bent, Gabby, Albrighton, Nzogbia in the side at the same time against reasonable opposition. We dont have 2 players capable of holding the midfield so we need to go with 3.

Collins will come back in for Stoke. Hopefully Herd is fit. Id prefer him at right back but not a chance McLeish will go with that. Herd, Petrov, Clark in midfield for Stoke I reckon. Harsh but maybe leave Albrighton out for this one. Nzogbia, Bent, Gabby as the front three.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ROBBO on December 22, 2011, 02:31:41 AM
Trouble is neither Gabby or Bent are good at holding on to the ball, Bent is an out and out in the box finisher who reads the game well, he may well have got on to some of those crosses tonight. Gabby cannot play main man up front.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Clampy on December 22, 2011, 08:19:15 AM
I've heard one of those supposedly ITK rumours that one possible player coming in is Damien Duff. Let's hope not eh?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 22, 2011, 10:50:16 AM
hmmm. can't imagine why we'd want Duff to be honest.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulTheVillan on December 22, 2011, 11:33:36 AM
hmmm. can't imagine why we'd want Duff to be honest.
Back up winger?

I'd rather we took a punt on a younger player for a back up winger.

Someone with pace and energy.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 22, 2011, 01:12:33 PM
hmmm. can't imagine why we'd want Duff to be honest.
Back up winger?

I'd rather we took a punt on a younger player for a back up winger.

Someone with pace and energy.

yeah i guess but seeing we need back-up nearly everywhere i'm not sure its a priority. As you say, he too old and he's iffy injury wise
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Matt C on December 22, 2011, 02:29:43 PM
Can't imagine Duff is on small wages either.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Clampy on December 22, 2011, 03:06:29 PM
hmmm. can't imagine why we'd want Duff to be honest.
Back up winger?

I'd rather we took a punt on a younger player for a back up winger.

Someone with pace and energy.

yeah i guess but seeing we need back-up nearly everywhere i'm not sure its a priority. As you say, he too old and he's iffy injury wise

And he's crap.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: eastie on December 22, 2011, 03:18:13 PM
steven davis may possibly be arriving from rangers to bolster our midfield options and id expect petrov to rejoin mon at sunderland , doubt we will have much to spend but hugely encouraged by the performance last night.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SheffieldVillain on December 22, 2011, 04:18:56 PM
steven davis may possibly be arriving from rangers to bolster our midfield options and id expect petrov to rejoin mon at sunderland , doubt we will have much to spend but hugely encouraged by the performance last night.

I really hope not. Essentially swapping Davis for Petrov would be utterly pointless.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on December 22, 2011, 04:29:33 PM
steven davis may possibly be arriving from rangers to bolster our midfield options and id expect petrov to rejoin mon at sunderland , doubt we will have much to spend but hugely encouraged by the performance last night.

I really hope not. Essentially swapping Davis for Petrov would be utterly pointless.

It's be worse than that, Petrov is better.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: jenninc on December 22, 2011, 09:19:48 PM
I'm not a fan of Zamora but right now we are really thin all round the squad - up front no exception. I'm happy to be linked with anyone who displaces Heskey on our bench right now!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Shoody on December 23, 2011, 01:04:03 AM
hmmm. can't imagine why we'd want Duff to be honest.
Back up winger?

I'd rather we took a punt on a younger player for a back up winger.

Someone with pace and energy.

Nathan Redmond or Junior Hoillet.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mister E on December 23, 2011, 09:14:36 AM
hmmm. can't imagine why we'd want Duff to be honest.
Back up winger?

I'd rather we took a punt on a younger player for a back up winger.

Someone with pace and energy.

Nathan Redmond or Junior Hoillet.
Is the right answer.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ADVILLAFAN on December 23, 2011, 11:32:22 AM
I think Hoilett's contract runs out this season? As does the contract for people like Butterfield and Clyne, who we've been linked with.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on December 23, 2011, 11:49:10 AM
Hoillett is and is going to be a very very good player, he'd be a great addition but I doubt it.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JUAN PABLO on December 23, 2011, 11:58:16 AM
I think Hoilett will go to one of the top 6 sides .     Could be good for Arse ( repalce Arshavin ) and could do a job at Spurs ( redknapp was moaning about not enough wide players last night )    .   

but Duff   ,please no .




Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: villasjf on December 23, 2011, 12:15:03 PM
I'm not a fan of Zamora but right now we are really thin all round the squad - up front no exception. I'm happy to be linked with anyone who displaces Heskey on our bench right now!
The trouble is Heskey isnt on the bench but in the starting line up too much before he falls over.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: midnite on December 23, 2011, 12:19:32 PM
If the ball hits your head and you sit in row Z
That's Zamoraaaa.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: WALTERS WARRIORS on December 23, 2011, 12:21:54 PM
The only players we should be looking at is "first team" replacements. We already have plenty of "squad" options. Ye that costs money but Heskey, Beye and Warnnock are coming to the ends of there contracts and that is nearely a £1m a month. We might not like it but Lerner has got to back Mcleish .........
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Big Dick Edwards on December 23, 2011, 12:36:42 PM
I'd rather we took a punt on a younger player for a back up winger.
Nathan Redmond or Junior Hoillet.

Hoillet is an exciting prospect and I'd be amazed if we had the money and the ambition to go and get him.

Redmond is still unproven but it 'd be worth it just to stick another finger up to The Noses.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Tokyo Sexwhale on December 23, 2011, 02:29:13 PM

Redmond is still unproven but it 'd be worth it just to stick another finger up to The Noses.

And pull out a bogey...
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on December 23, 2011, 02:51:42 PM
Quote
Sunderland boss Martin O’Neill is ready to offer £8million for Fulham’s unsettled striker Bobby Zamora - but faces a fight to make him move from London.

O’Neill wants a new target man and thinks the England cap would be perfect for the style he wants to play to turn round the fortunes of the Black Cats.

Zamora can leave Fulham where he has had a stormy relationship with Martin Jol, but the far-travelled forward is settled in the capital.

O’Neill could push the boat out and offer top terms, but the word from Zamora’s camp is that the next move is not just about money.

So, 8m for a 31 year old. Still, he's English, so he'll be the easy, no-effort option.

Some things never change.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Karl Bridges on December 23, 2011, 03:24:34 PM
Hoillet is Spurs bound.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rudy Can't Fail on December 23, 2011, 03:31:35 PM
Quote
Sunderland boss Martin O’Neill is ready to offer £8million for Fulham’s unsettled striker Bobby Zamora - but faces a fight to make him move from London.

O’Neill wants a new target man and thinks the England cap would be perfect for the style he wants to play to turn round the fortunes of the Black Cats.

Zamora can leave Fulham where he has had a stormy relationship with Martin Jol, but the far-travelled forward is settled in the capital.

O’Neill could push the boat out and offer top terms, but the word from Zamora’s camp is that the next move is not just about money.

So, 8m for a 31 year old. Still, he's English, so he'll be the easy, no-effort option.

Some things never change.

All that's missing is the 3 and a half year contract on £60k a week. Oh..and then never play him, obviously.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: The Man With A Stick on December 23, 2011, 04:34:58 PM
£8m for Zamora and £7m for Cahill (who's out of contract in June anyway) just highlight the fact that we should be shopping abroad, if we're planning on doing any business.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Irish villain on December 23, 2011, 06:46:55 PM
MON and Zamora are a match made in heaven!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on December 24, 2011, 02:22:34 AM
Redmond is going to be a top player from what I have seen of him and Hoilet going to Spurs is nailed on isn't it?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: olaftab on December 24, 2011, 09:58:38 AM
MON and Zamora are a match made in heaven!

That would be fantastic and I hope Sunderland give him all the money he can waste!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: VillaAlways on December 24, 2011, 12:50:20 PM
Alex McLeish has hinted Chelsea playmaker Josh McEachran could be a loan target for Aston Villa.

The Villa boss has made a new central midfielder his priority in January having seen on-loan Tottenham man Jermaine Jenas ruled out for the remainder of the season.

McLeish enquired about the 18-year-old in the summer but at that stage Chelsea manager Andre Villas-Boas wanted to keep McEachran at Stamford Bridge.

However, McEachran has found his opportunities limited to one substitute appearance in the Premier League and a handful of Carling Cup games.

The England Under-21 international has also been linked with a switch to Bolton and Villa’s hopes of securing the player could hinge on Chelsea’s pursuit of Bolton centre-back Gary Cahill, so McLeish remained coy on the prospect of a deal for McEachran.

“There is no movement at the moment. We are thinking about trying to add to the squad and it is probably not fair for me to talk about players at other clubs while there is no business being done,” said McLeish.

“He (McEachran) is one of their hottest prospects. I think they are thinking about loaning him, yes. At the start of the season they weren’t, but the word is they are thinking about it.

“But I don’t want to say yes about anything because I am juggling a few balls.”

Meanwhile, Villa striker Darren Bent is determined to make a difference against Stoke on Boxing Day as he eyes a return after a thigh injury.

“It is an important part of the season for all teams with so many games,” said Bent.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JJ-AV on December 24, 2011, 01:48:29 PM
Loaning McEchran to play ahead of Gardner seems strange.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 24, 2011, 01:55:34 PM
daft more like it. we've got kids coming out of our ears as it is. Need someone proven in the midfield.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: luke25 on December 24, 2011, 01:58:22 PM
Sod that, the only way I'd want to develop another teams youngsters is if they'd add anything to our 1st team, like Walker did, Mcthingy would add nothing and hinder Gardner.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: olaftab on December 24, 2011, 03:07:46 PM
Loaning players from lesser clubs tut tut ... Is this where we are now?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Exeter 77 on December 24, 2011, 07:28:42 PM
I'm not a big fan of taking players on loan from other Premier League sides. It can hinder the progress of our own younger players as already mentioned and as, with Kyle Walker, give top flight experience to players from which the parent club benefits and is, ultimately, detrimental to our own team's progress.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mister E on December 24, 2011, 10:30:36 PM
Loaning McEchran to play ahead of Gardner seems strange.
Makes no sense.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Brend'Watkins on December 24, 2011, 11:12:44 PM
Loaning McEchran to play ahead of Gardner seems strange.
Makes no sense.

It might if he can play full back.  If he can't, well, as you say it makes little sense.

I am not a fan of loaning players from the top 4.  It diminishes our status and does little for our development while at the same time doing plenty for theirs. I'm aware it's our level at present but we should be bigger than this.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Shrek on December 25, 2011, 08:31:42 AM
I've no problem loaning from the top 4, it's from the likes of spurs that's embarrassing.

JM does nothing different to Makoun.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Nastylee on December 25, 2011, 11:55:55 AM
Perhaps it is a back up plan in case he drops those balls he's juggling.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: toplad4u on December 25, 2011, 12:47:09 PM
I'm not a big fan of taking players on loan from other Premier League sides. It can hinder the progress of our own younger players as already mentioned and as, with Kyle Walker, give top flight experience to players from which the parent club benefits and is, ultimately, detrimental to our own team's progress.

Exactly felt it really hampered Eric Lichaj's development! And had no chance of keeping him.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Billy Walker on December 25, 2011, 05:16:51 PM
I've no problem loaning from the top 4, it's from the likes of spurs that's embarrassing.

JM does nothing different to Makoun.

I think its embarrassing for Villa to be loaning players off any club full stop.  Surely our youngsters are as good as any from the so-called "top four"?  Competing with Bolton to loan a youngster off Chelsea sends out all kinds of signals about our club. 
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Grande Pablo on December 25, 2011, 08:12:05 PM
Competing with Bolton to loan a youngster off Chelsea sends out all kinds of signals about our club. 

They have the upper hand with a top class centre back to sell in the opposite direction.  That's where we can't compete - all our crown jewels have already  been sold.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on December 25, 2011, 08:15:48 PM
My issue is not loaning from the top 4 etc, Adebayor, Walker last season, Wellbeck at Sunderland last season etc showed that very good players that are not getting games can go and get games at a high level and be useful, and for all the argument about Walker, even for 6 months it was an inspired bit of business in a position we are still very weak at a time we needed it most, and he, Bent, Petrov over the last few games etc saved us from a pretty miserable run in. No, my issue is that Josh McEchran from what I have seen is a lightweight, over hyped, poor mans Wilshire with very little talent other than being the only decent young English player at Chelsea. It is a signing straight out of the people have wet themselves so lets have him if we can even if only for 5 minutes book, when really he is mediocre, and no better than Herd, Gardner or Clark in there, let alone Bannan or Ireland. We need a centre mid, but one considerably higher calibre than him.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Shrek on December 25, 2011, 10:55:18 PM
Mcleish admits: I could sell Bent.

http://www.mirrorfootball.co.uk/news/Transfer-news-Aston-Villa-could-sell-Darren-Bent-in-January-with-QPR-interested-article846170.html?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

Does he..
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Davey B on December 25, 2011, 11:15:51 PM
Mcleish admits: I could sell Bent.

http://www.mirrorfootball.co.uk/news/Transfer-news-Aston-Villa-could-sell-Darren-Bent-in-January-with-QPR-interested-article846170.html?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

Does he..


Daily Mirror says so, .............. Daily Mail says not!

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2078532/Darren-Bent-sale-insist-Aston-Villa.html

 :-\
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Irish villain on December 25, 2011, 11:20:46 PM
Oh FFS.

Grrrr.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on December 25, 2011, 11:21:56 PM
Mcleish admits: I could sell Bent.

http://www.mirrorfootball.co.uk/news/Transfer-news-Aston-Villa-could-sell-Darren-Bent-in-January-with-QPR-interested-article846170.html?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

Does he..

That would be the ultimate signal that we'd totally given up even pretending to be a big club.

I hope they realise that.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: olaftab on December 26, 2011, 12:20:24 AM
I can't see any of the teams in the top 6/7  going for him however if we can get £30/£35M from QPR  fine let him go.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Billy Walker on December 26, 2011, 12:34:45 AM
Competing with Bolton to loan a youngster off Chelsea sends out all kinds of signals about our club. 

They have the upper hand with a top class centre back to sell in the opposite direction.  That's where we can't compete - all our crown jewels have already  been sold.

I hope we are not "competing" for the player full stop.  If this type of thing was happening under Doug Ellis I'd have been furious.  It's like owning a vintage Rolls Royce and running it like a second hand Skoda.  This is totally not how Aston Villa should be run and the knock on effect is that the club's image gets knocked down a further peg or two.  As I say, I do hope this is unfounded, nonsensical speculation; if not, I do wonder where we are headed under Randy.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 26, 2011, 12:46:31 AM
Load of shitstirring bollocks.

Ignore.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on December 26, 2011, 01:07:15 AM
Load of shitstirring bollocks.

Ignore.

Agreed Greg. The article says nothing of the sort. Just typical made up bollocks at this time of year.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 26, 2011, 01:22:16 AM
Load of shitstirring bollocks.

Ignore.

Agreed Greg. The article says nothing of the sort. Just typical made up bollocks at this time of year.


Quite. It's the interview he's given every other paper edited up to suit the reporter's agenda.  If i was AM i'd ban the bastard
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Shrek on December 26, 2011, 08:41:24 AM
And then, from the same interview he isn't...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2078532/Darren-Bent-sale-insist-Aston-Villa.html

What is with journalists?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: eastie on December 26, 2011, 09:28:17 AM
Mcleish admits: I could sell Bent.

http://www.mirrorfootball.co.uk/news/Transfer-news-Aston-Villa-could-sell-Darren-Bent-in-January-with-QPR-interested-article846170.html?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter

Does he..

That would be the ultimate signal that we'd totally given up even pretending to be a big club.

I hope they realise that.

Surely Paulie you must have noticed by now that ambition died many months ago!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Jimmy Smash on December 26, 2011, 09:31:50 AM
Unfortunately we are where we are.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Clampy on December 26, 2011, 10:26:16 AM
It's just yet more stirring from a second rate journalist writing for a second rate newspaper.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: eastie on December 26, 2011, 10:41:07 AM
It's just yet more stirring from a second rate journalist writing for a second rate newspaper.

Let's just hope we can get 2 or 3 quality signings in the new year to bolster the squad and give us all a lift.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Clampy on December 26, 2011, 10:44:45 AM
It's just yet more stirring from a second rate journalist writing for a second rate newspaper.

How many of your 6000 posts say exactly the above clampy?
Do you work for the sun by any chance?

Are you sure your not James Nursey? You always seem to go on the offensive whenever someone has a dig at him or The Mirror?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Irish villain on December 26, 2011, 10:58:04 AM
It's just yet more stirring from a second rate journalist writing for a second rate newspaper.

Let's just hope we can get 2 or 3 quality signings in the new year to bolster the squad and give us all a lift.

A lift is what we need.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: eastie on December 26, 2011, 10:59:00 AM
It's just yet more stirring from a second rate journalist writing for a second rate newspaper.

How many of your 6000 posts say exactly the above clampy?
Do you work for the sun by any chance?

Are you sure your not James Nursey? You always seem to go on the offensive whenever someone has a dig at him or The Mirror?

Never bought the mirror in my life clampy ,but I find most papers are very hit and miss regarding transfers although a work colleague 2 weeks ago reckoned someone itk at villa park swore blind to him that bent would go to qpr in January and I laughed at him- now though I'm not so sure !
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Clampy on December 26, 2011, 11:10:34 AM
It's just yet more stirring from a second rate journalist writing for a second rate newspaper.

How many of your 6000 posts say exactly the above clampy?
Do you work for the sun by any chance?

Are you sure your not James Nursey? You always seem to go on the offensive whenever someone has a dig at him or The Mirror?

Never bought the mirror in my life clampy ,but I find most papers are very hit and miss regarding transfers although a work colleague 2 weeks ago reckoned someone itk at villa park swore blind to him that bent would go to qpr in January and I laughed at him- now though I'm not so sure !

The point i was making Eastie before you got offended was that out of all the papers this morning, The Mirror is the only one who has got as their headline 'We could Sell Bent'. None of the others have which is why Greg earlier called it 'Shit Stirring Bollocks' but you did'nt pick him up on it.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: eastie on December 26, 2011, 11:12:47 AM
Now now clampy,this is the time of peace and goodwill you old rascal!

Yes Greg made his point about the mirror but you have made the same point about the mirror god knows how many times ,yet I don't recall you being on the back of the other press,were you ripped off during the maxwell reign ?

Anyway enjoy tonight and lets hope 2012 sees the fa cup in our hands in may!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Irish villain on December 26, 2011, 11:15:13 AM
Now now clampy,this is the time of peace and goodwill you old rascal!

'Lets not bicker and argue about, who killed who, this is supposed to be a happy occasion'
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: eastie on December 26, 2011, 11:17:45 AM
Now now clampy,this is the time of peace and goodwill you old rascal!

'Lets not bicker and argue about, who killed who, this is supposed to be a happy occasion'

Agreed , enjoy the festive season and a happy new year to all !
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Clampy on December 26, 2011, 11:18:42 AM
Now now clampy,this is the time of peace and goodwill you old rascal!

'Lets not bicker and argue about, who killed who, this is supposed to be a happy occasion'

Is that Python?

Anyway, i was fine until i remembered that James Nursey is still earning decent money for being the Phil Dowd of journalism.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Irish villain on December 26, 2011, 11:21:34 AM
Now now clampy,this is the time of peace and goodwill you old rascal!

'Lets not bicker and argue about, who killed who, this is supposed to be a happy occasion'

Is that Python?

Anyway, i was fine until i remembered that James Nursey is still earning decent money for being the Phil Dowd of journalism.

It is. Monthy Python and the Holy Grail.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithe on December 26, 2011, 01:52:41 PM
Why would Mcreachan leaving on loan be dependent on a centre half coming in?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: wookster on December 26, 2011, 04:25:07 PM
Slightly off topic, but does the guy we signed from the Irish Republic not arrive in the new year?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: eastie on December 26, 2011, 04:31:56 PM
Slightly off topic, but does the guy we signed from the Irish Republic not arrive in the new year?

I believe so but I doubt he would be ready for the premiership,may take a while to settle in and fulfil his potential but hopefully he will prove useful in time.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JJ-AV on December 26, 2011, 05:34:05 PM
I'm calling it now - Liverpool to offer Carroll and cash for Bent.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Chris Smith on December 26, 2011, 05:38:35 PM
I'm calling it now - Liverpool to offer Carroll and cash for Bent.

Nah, with Suarez suspended they're not going to get rid of another striker, if they did he wouldn't want to come and we couldn't afford his wages.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Shrek on December 26, 2011, 05:39:06 PM
I'm calling it now - Liverpool to offer Carroll and cash for Bent.


Yes please.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Vanilla on December 26, 2011, 06:00:12 PM
I'm calling it now - Liverpool to offer Carroll and cash for Bent.

I can't see anyone above the class of mediocre coming to the club in January, if anyone at all. Whether you would consider Carroll in that in that bracket is subjective.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dante Lavelli on December 26, 2011, 06:09:54 PM
I'm calling it now - Liverpool to offer Carroll and cash for Bent.

I wish.  I think that would be a good bit of business for all parties.  But as Chris says, it's unlikely that they let any striker leave when Suarez is banned.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: luke25 on December 26, 2011, 06:13:08 PM
I'm calling it now - Liverpool to offer Carroll and cash for Bent.
Unless its Carroll plus the £35m they paid for the lumbering oaf then I bloody hope not.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Irish villain on December 26, 2011, 06:32:28 PM
I'm calling it now - Liverpool to offer Carroll and cash for Bent.


Yes please.

I hope you are (both) joking? That would be dreadful business.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on December 26, 2011, 06:39:56 PM
I'm calling it now - Liverpool to offer Carroll and cash for Bent.


Yes please.

I hope you are (both) joking? That would be dreadful business.

I think they must both be utterly insane.

A proven goal scorer over four or five years for a young player with off field problems, who has managed half a decent PL season.

That would be mental.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Irish villain on December 26, 2011, 06:47:06 PM
I'm calling it now - Liverpool to offer Carroll and cash for Bent.


Yes please.

I hope you are (both) joking? That would be dreadful business.

I think they must both be utterly insane.

A proven goal scorer over four or five years for a young player with off field problems, who has managed half a decent PL season.

That would be mental.

And depressing for us fans. Selling Bent and looking for our own replacement would even be preferable to that sort of deal. In that scenario, not only would we be confirming our fall from grace and status as a selling club, we'd be taking it a step further by accepting the 'hand-me-downs' from the 'top table'.

No thanks!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Percy McCarthy on December 26, 2011, 06:52:45 PM
I wouldn't be against selling Bent if I thought we'd spend the money wisely. However, as I'm not confident on that score I'd keep him.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on December 26, 2011, 07:02:26 PM
I think Chelsea is a more likely destination. They need goals, are still in Europe, have a light strikeforce at the moment etc. An over rated young midfielder for 6 months and 20 million to us I reckon.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Phil from the upper holte on December 26, 2011, 07:22:58 PM
I've also heard Caroll for bent, would be awful
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dave on December 26, 2011, 09:25:21 PM
I'm calling it now - Liverpool to offer Carroll and cash for Bent.


Yes please.

I hope you are (both) joking? That would be dreadful business.

I think they must both be utterly insane.
Quite.

What on earth would make anybody think that would be a good idea?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Jimmy Smash on December 26, 2011, 10:03:29 PM
 I think any Bent money will go straight into Randy's pocket.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ROBBO on December 26, 2011, 10:04:45 PM
Carrol must be the most overpriced player in the history of football.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Jimmy Smash on December 26, 2011, 10:06:03 PM
It's just yet more stirring from a second rate journalist writing for a second rate newspaper.

Let's just hope we can get 2 or 3 quality signings in the new year to bolster the squad and give us all a lift.

Oh you poor naive fool.  ;)
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: VillaZogmariner on December 27, 2011, 12:05:15 AM
I'm calling it now - Liverpool to offer Carroll and cash for Bent.

That's what I've been told too by somebody who works with Villa in a scouting capacity.

Carroll & Shelvey & £15m for Bent.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Davey B on December 27, 2011, 12:21:29 AM
I would hope you did not get Carroll. Very over-rated on the park in my opinion, and more bother than enough off it.

You'd be better off going for Berbatov or Demba Ba, someone that can replace Bent's goal tally and not be the off field arse that he is.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on December 27, 2011, 12:26:54 AM
I'm calling it now - Liverpool to offer Carroll and cash for Bent.

That's what I've been told too by somebody who works with Villa in a scouting capacity.

Carroll & Shelvey & £15m for Bent.

That would make Bent worth something like £37-£40 million seeing they shelled out £35m+ for Carroll alone. Just can't see it at all. And the very last thing we need is another lazy waste of talent on our books. I'vbe still got a tiny bit of faith in Ireland one day coming good, but Carroll, given a great opportunity at one of Europe's biggest clubs would rather drink away his best years as opposed to applying himself to be the best he can be. No ta.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on December 27, 2011, 12:40:15 AM
I'm calling it now - Liverpool to offer Carroll and cash for Bent.

That's what I've been told too by somebody who works with Villa in a scouting capacity.

Carroll & Shelvey & £15m for Bent.

That's quite an astonishingly unlikely deal.
Carroll was £35m (ridiculous) not so long ago. Shelvey I'm undecided on but is fairly highly rated or at least has been for a while... plus £15m?

I personally rate Carroll (and have for years) and think if used properly he could be a goal machine in this league but I'm loathe to lose Bent under any conceivable circumstances but I have to say this would be too good to refuse.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dante Lavelli on December 27, 2011, 01:04:14 AM
I'm calling it now - Liverpool to offer Carroll and cash for Bent.

That's what I've been told too by somebody who works with Villa in a scouting capacity.

Carroll & Shelvey & £15m for Bent.

That's quite an astonishingly unlikely deal.
Carroll was £35m (ridiculous) not so long ago. Shelvey I'm undecided on but is fairly highly rated or at least has been for a while... plus £15m?

I personally rate Carroll (and have for years) and think if used properly he could be a goal machine in this league but I'm loathe to lose Bent under any conceivable circumstances but I have to say this would be too good to refuse.

I agree with Mazrim.  That offer is way too good to be true. 

I really rate Carroll and I think playing at a club of villa's stature would be perfect for him.  He'd play every week and would be able to get himself back into form and amongst the goals.  Watching him today he is still an absolute handful for central defenders and a menace in the air winning headers that he should not even get near. 

I do not think he would score as many as Bent over a season but he would be a better focal point than Bent allowing us to retain the ball better and he'd also help defensively with corners and the like.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: phantom limb on December 27, 2011, 01:38:13 AM
If you put aside the fact that Carroll is a massive fat drunk who's probably scored about 2 goals for Liverpool since going there then this seems a great idea and nothing can possibly go wrong. We need someone to replace Heskey and he seems to have the requisite amount of big uselessness.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: KevinGage on December 27, 2011, 01:59:47 AM
I remember when the deal was first announced and SSN had Tony Cantscoreino and Iain Dowie arse licking all things Redscouse.   

Dowie "Yeah, it's an astute bit of business by Liverpool, they've maybe overspent by about £10 million but..."

So not really very astute at all then.

It looked mental at the time, and I don't see why King Kenny should be different to any other manager. Get a decision like that wrong and your job should be on the line.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: VillaSpen on December 27, 2011, 03:23:46 AM
Just watched the full 90 minutes of Liverpool's draw with Wigan in the company of a couple of plastic-scouse ex-pats. After seeing Carroll saunter about looking vaguely interested at best and not showing the least amount of remorse after the three sitters he missed I would be appalled at the thought of him coming in on the wages he earns. Plus, with our less than impressive delivery from wide areas of late he would be entirely pointless.

Let King Kenny put up with him.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: NeilH on December 27, 2011, 07:07:42 AM
Given the policy of the club over the last six months I've virtually resigned myself to him going. My gut feeling says he's definitely off and if I were a betting man, I'd plump for Arsenal to add some support to Van Persie. He'd be the perfect goal-hanger to compliment Van Persie's graft and application.
As for replacements, well we can certainly forget getting anyone of his standard in again, those days are for now long gone.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Phil from the upper holte on December 27, 2011, 08:39:15 AM
I said to my mate I can't think of anything worse than gettin Caroll for Bent and he said I can not gettin a replacement, I paused and said isn't it the same thing??

It's a no and I would really fear for us on the goal front, were struggling now
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: midnite on December 27, 2011, 09:17:03 AM
I'd keep bent over Carroll any day. I fear if it does happen with carroll's size it'll be hoof football again.

Bent is a goal machine. Stats speak for themselves.

Apparently pienaar is up for sale... Now he is someone i'd like to see down villa park, feeding bent all day long
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Jimmy Smash on December 27, 2011, 09:44:55 AM
At least if we had Carroll it would continue the Villa tradition of signing a great striker on paper who becomes inexplicably useless when pen is put to paper.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dave Clark Five on December 27, 2011, 09:54:43 AM
Look around for someone who is already injured or injury prone. That is, historically, the type of player that we will buy.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 27, 2011, 11:05:44 AM
I don't think Carroll's coming. As others have said, it Lerner did sanction Bent's sale, it would be more likely he'd pocket half the money and buy a cheap replacement. That unfortunately seems to be the way things are going. I think its more likely he'll wait until at least the summer to offload Bent unless we get an unbelievable offer.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Clampy on December 27, 2011, 11:20:44 AM
We've needed a 20 goal a season striker for years and now we've got one, the last thing we should do is sell him. We should concentrate on getting him back to what he does best. Creating chances for him would be a start.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on December 27, 2011, 11:24:19 AM
We've needed a 20 goal a season striker for years and now we've got one, the last thing we should do is sell him. We should concentrate on getting him back to what he does best. Creating chances for him would be a start.

Well said.

Unfortunately, I don't trust the board not to cash in.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 27, 2011, 11:28:54 AM
We've needed a 20 goal a season striker for years and now we've got one, the last thing we should do is sell him. We should concentrate on getting him back to what he does best. Creating chances for him would be a start.


Agree totally, but is AM going to set us up in a way that suits Bent's talents? I could be wrong but i'm not sure he fancies him or put another way, if AM had that money GH had i don't think he would have bought Bent.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Clampy on December 27, 2011, 11:34:45 AM
We've needed a 20 goal a season striker for years and now we've got one, the last thing we should do is sell him. We should concentrate on getting him back to what he does best. Creating chances for him would be a start.

Well said.

Unfortunately, I don't trust the board not to cash in.

The only problem we would have is if Bent is made aware of a club wanting him (Arsenal, Liverpool etc). He may be tempted to go rather than stick around and play for a team that offers him nothing to work with. That's up to the manager to sort that side of it out.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JJ-AV on December 27, 2011, 11:57:14 AM
I'm calling it now - Liverpool to offer Carroll and cash for Bent.


Yes please.

I hope you are (both) joking? That would be dreadful business.

I think they must both be utterly insane.
Quite.

What on earth would make anybody think that would be a good idea?

I don't think it is at all. It would be awful. I just think it makes alot of sense considering the circumstances.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: garyshawsknee on December 27, 2011, 12:06:59 PM
With Albrighton back in form and Nzogbia starting to show his true colours,Bent will hopefully get back into his form of last season. I would be amazed if we did sell him,but then again I was amazed at the going on's in the summer,so fcuk knows what rabbit the board could pull out of the hat.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mister E on December 27, 2011, 01:19:47 PM
Arsenal for Bent has been mentioned a couple of times here: I don't think Arsey would countenance coughing up the £25m that we'd want for him. Just not his style.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dante Lavelli on December 27, 2011, 01:35:01 PM
Arsenal for Bent has been mentioned a couple of times here: I don't think Arsey would countenance coughing up the £25m that we'd want for him. Just not his style.

Wenger would know a player from abroad that would be a lot cheaper and probably better (in the sense that he'd contribute more to their passing game).

If Bent goes to Arsenal then I fear we would have sold him way too cheaply.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on December 27, 2011, 02:34:53 PM
Chelsea is still my bet. Anelka gone. Torres not in form and need a league goalscorer, plus could afford him.


I saw the Pienaar thing Mal, think he would be a brilliant signing for us.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Grande Pablo on December 27, 2011, 03:08:18 PM
If Bent is Arsenal bound, could Chamakah do a job for us in exchange?

I still think we missed a trick in not going after Shane Long.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: luke25 on December 27, 2011, 03:12:44 PM
If Bent is Arsenal bound, could Chamakah do a job for us in exchange?
Oh crikey no, no and no again.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: tarzansbrother on December 27, 2011, 03:25:35 PM
Sell Heskey for a cut price fee and give Delfounso the chance in the second half of season. Sink or swim for him as he has been around the first squad for a while now.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Fuse on December 27, 2011, 03:32:49 PM
Bent has got 5 goals this season. If we can get our money back I'd be delighted. We have been far better in the last two games without him. Get a partner to play with Gabby not Bent who can't trap a ball
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mister E on December 27, 2011, 03:33:55 PM
Sell Heskey for a cut price fee and give Delfounso the chance in the second half of season. Sink or swim for him as he has been around the first squad for a while now.
He's been around for circa three seasons, under 4 managers. That, for me, says it all.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: James on December 27, 2011, 03:50:45 PM
If Andy Carroll is £35m worth, then a proven goalscorer and senior international like Bent should be almost in the Torres category for a transfer fee! I'd rather have Defoe than Carroll anyday. That said, I really don't think that we'll see any ins or outs in January. When the big earners' contracts run out in the summer the board will have to do something, but not until I suspect!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Des Little on December 27, 2011, 03:54:18 PM
If we get an offer anywhere near what we paid for Bent, Randy will take it.  And the Fonz isn't the answer either BTW.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SteveN on December 27, 2011, 04:16:26 PM
If we get an acceptable offer for Bent and/or Heskey we will sell and buy Johnson or Zamora from Fulham or Maynard from Bristol City.  I've read it in the tea leaves.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dante Lavelli on December 27, 2011, 04:35:08 PM
Sell Heskey for a cut price fee and give Delfounso the chance in the second half of season. Sink or swim for him as he has been around the first squad for a while now.

I'd go with this.  He cannot be much worse than Heskey and he deserves a run in the team to prove himself (one way or another).  The last thing we want is a Cahill situation just because we are desperate to shoe horn Heskey in the team all the time.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: The Laughing Policeman on December 27, 2011, 04:53:12 PM
On the way home from the Manure game I heard a rumour that Bent was 'injured' because a deal has already been struck with QPR for him. As I say it's only a rumour. But QPR are a club with money to spend, and Bent's injury which AM said at the time would clear up in time for the next game seems to have dragged on for a little while now.
I've heard the same rumour a couple of times now. So I'm just putting one plus one together and hopefully making three.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Aston Manor on December 27, 2011, 05:03:36 PM
Chelsea is still my bet. Anelka gone. Torres not in form and need a league goalscorer, plus could afford him.


I saw the Pienaar thing Mal, think he would be a brilliant signing for us.

Maybe Pienaar of a couple of seasons ago but not now. Taken one crock from Spurs (Jenas who I think is going to be a permanent signing for us) so I can't see why we should take another from them.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Aston Manor on December 27, 2011, 05:08:00 PM
On the way home from the Manure game I heard a rumour that Bent was 'injured' because a deal has already been struck with QPR for him. As I say it's only a rumour. But QPR are a club with money to spend, and Bent's injury which AM said at the time would clear up in time for the next game seems to have dragged on for a little while now.
I've heard the same rumour a couple of times now. So I'm just putting one plus one together and hopefully making three.

Maybe, maybe not. But I cannot believe we for one second would drop our goalscorer because of a transfer to anyone let alone QPR. We need wins so McLeish knowing he is under pressure would allow such a playing ban to happen at the say so of QPR? Rather unlikely.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Chris Smith on December 27, 2011, 05:27:52 PM
On the way home from the Manure game I heard a rumour that Bent was 'injured' because a deal has already been struck with QPR for him. As I say it's only a rumour. But QPR are a club with money to spend, and Bent's injury which AM said at the time would clear up in time for the next game seems to have dragged on for a little while now.
I've heard the same rumour a couple of times now. So I'm just putting one plus one together and hopefully making three.

So why did he play the next week against Bolton?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SoccerHQ on December 27, 2011, 07:53:35 PM
Two targets I'd go after in January would be Samba and Nedum Onouha.

I keep on mentioning Samba but look at his performance at Anfield yesterday, was heading away practically every cross so I'm sure we wouldn't concede as many set piece goals if we had someone like him in central defence. Offer Blackburn 5m + Collins.

Onouha has slipped out of the picture at City so I can't imagine they'd be asking that much for him, maybe 4m which is the same as we signed Hutton for. Onouha is better and can play at centre back aswell. He was pretty good on loan at Sunderland last season.

As for the rest of the side, I wouldn't get a new striker in as I believe Bent isn't leaving until the summer.

I dread to think what sort of central midfielder McLeish is going to come up with.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Chris Smith on December 27, 2011, 08:05:44 PM
Onouha makes Cuellar look like John Gidman. He's a good athlete but a poor footballer.

Blackburn aren't going to sell Samba. The fans already hate the manager, they'd lynch him on the Fernurst car park if he sold their best player.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Holte L2 on December 27, 2011, 10:02:16 PM
Sell Heskey for a cut price fee and give Delfounso the chance in the second half of season. Sink or swim for him as he has been around the first squad for a while now.

I'd go with this.  He cannot be much worse than Heskey and he deserves a run in the team to prove himself (one way or another).  The last thing we want is a Cahill situation just because we are desperate to shoe horn Heskey in the team all the time.

As would I. If Delfoneuso can physical strength to his game, I think he'll make it. he's good on the ball and can finish.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ROBBO on December 27, 2011, 10:10:38 PM
I don't know what any of you have seen that makes you think Delfounso is going to make a premier league player.
He has had numerous chances and never given me the impression he is going to make it, another Luke Moore who will make a living in the lower divisions. Get Samba please.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: KRS on December 27, 2011, 10:31:45 PM
Havent read much of this thread, so I'd like to throw Dempseys name into the "wish list". He's the kind of midfielder we need right who could contribute with both goals and creativity from the middle of the pitch. A few weeks ago there were rumours that he was unhappy and unsettled so would be a great signing if we could bring him in.

Selling Bent is not an option and hope all these rumours are far from the truth although there are reports that he has had a bust up with AM.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Gareth on December 27, 2011, 11:34:09 PM
Dempsey is a decent Premiership player but personally if we are shopping at Craven Cottage I'd prefer to return with Dembele
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Risso on December 27, 2011, 11:41:04 PM
I don't know what any of you have seen that makes you think Delfounso is going to make a premier league player.
He has had numerous chances and never given me the impression he is going to make it, another Luke Moore who will make a living in the lower divisions. Get Samba please.

I'm with you on Delfouneso unfortunately.  He just doesn't look good enough at all I'm afraid.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on December 27, 2011, 11:42:44 PM
I don't know what any of you have seen that makes you think Delfounso is going to make a premier league player.
He has had numerous chances and never given me the impression he is going to make it, another Luke Moore who will make a living in the lower divisions. Get Samba please.

I'm with you on Delfouneso unfortunately.  He just doesn't look good enough at all I'm afraid.

He just looks out of his depth, sadly.

We have to be realistic, and the majority of our kids are not going to make it. He's 21 soon and at the age where you'd expect him to have shown something, but he really hasn't.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 27, 2011, 11:49:33 PM
i'd rather we kept our powder dry to the summer than splurge out on the likes of Dempsey. Now it looks likely we'll finish 10th or lower but not relegated i'd assume they'd be better options in May when the likes of  petrov are let go. We need strengthening all over the stop really and though i'd like this midfielder in i'm not hopeful we'll get what we want.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dante Lavelli on December 27, 2011, 11:58:07 PM
i'd rather we kept our powder dry to the summer than splurge out on the likes of Dempsey. Now it looks likely we'll finish 10th or lower but not relegated i'd assume they'd be better options in May when the likes of  petrov are let go. We need strengthening all over the stop really and though i'd like this midfielder in i'm not hopeful we'll get what we want.

We'd be paying the ceiling price for Dempsey so it's a no from me.

With regard to The Fonz.  He would still be a reserve striker even without Heskey so it would not be as if we're completely reliant on his ability (or otherwise).  I just think it is time to twist on him or fold.  He could make a very nice life for himself being 4th choice striker but I'd prefer to either give him a chance (with us, or out on loan) to see how good/or bad he actually is.  He's earning too much money to be doing nothing and not being part of the playing squad.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on December 28, 2011, 12:42:41 AM
I would take Dempsey with glee, but he would be way too expensive to make it a deal worth doing, and he must be 28 ish now.

I would much prefer the club adopt a stance of no incoming player, unless on a free and thus only costing wages on a maximum 3 year deal, being over the age of 26, preferably under 24. Thus giving time to grow, good sell on value and an opportunity to develop a team.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on December 28, 2011, 01:02:43 AM
I don't know what any of you have seen that makes you think Delfounso is going to make a premier league player.
He has had numerous chances and never given me the impression he is going to make it, another Luke Moore who will make a living in the lower divisions. Get Samba please.

I'm with you on Delfouneso unfortunately.  He just doesn't look good enough at all I'm afraid.

He just looks out of his depth, sadly.

We have to be realistic, and the majority of our kids are not going to make it. He's 21 soon and at the age where you'd expect him to have shown something, but he really hasn't.

Unfortunately I have to agree. There was an opportunity last night where he was one on one with a defender. Can't recall who. A Daniel Sturridge or young Gabby for example would have tried to blast past him and shoot or at the very least look up for support which was arriving to his left. Fonz did neither and looked like he actually had no idea what to do, or simply lacked the confidence to make a decision. Now maybe he needs a season on loan somewhere to give him a lift, but he needs to show that he has "it" more importantly wants "it" sooner rather than later.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dave Clark Five on December 28, 2011, 01:29:34 AM
Boumsong is being rumoured to be on his way to us.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on December 28, 2011, 01:37:28 AM
Boumsong is being rumoured to be on his way to us.

Wasn't he utterly pish at Newcastle?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TheSandman on December 28, 2011, 01:47:12 AM
Yes, but he did well enough at Rangers and Lyon. McLeish knows him well as he signed him at Rangers so it wouldn't surprise me.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dante Lavelli on December 28, 2011, 01:47:36 AM
I would take Dempsey with glee, but he would be way too expensive to make it a deal worth doing, and he must be 28 ish now.

I would much prefer the club adopt a stance of no incoming player, unless on a free and thus only costing wages on a maximum 3 year deal, being over the age of 26, preferably under 24. Thus giving time to grow, good sell on value and an opportunity to develop a team.

Agree with that.  I'd prefer that we offered "dempsey's" transfer fee and wages to a player like Hoillet.  He may not be as good right now but has the potential to get even better and crucially will have a much higher sell on value in the future, whether that be Bolton or Barcelona buying him from us.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on December 28, 2011, 01:59:14 AM
Yes, but he did well enough at Rangers and Lyon. McLeish knows him well as he signed him at Rangers so it wouldn't surprise me.

He's 32 so if he does come it would be a short term deal and experienced cover. If I recall correctly the whole deal was a bit dodgy and for a lot of money. He just never lived up to the expectation of the fee.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mister E on December 28, 2011, 08:14:27 AM
Sell Heskey for a cut price fee and give Delfounso the chance in the second half of season. Sink or swim for him as he has been around the first squad for a while now.

I'd go with this.  He cannot be much worse than Heskey and he deserves a run in the team to prove himself (one way or another).  The last thing we want is a Cahill situation just because we are desperate to shoe horn Heskey in the team all the time.
Delfouneso has been around for circa three seasons, under 4 managers. That, for me, says it all - he's not Premiership material. Sad but it's time for us all to move on (and that includes  not-so-young-now Nathan).
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mister E on December 28, 2011, 08:16:02 AM
Yes, but he did well enough at Rangers and Lyon. McLeish knows him well as he signed him at Rangers so it wouldn't surprise me.

He's 32 so if he does come it would be a short term deal and experienced cover. If I recall correctly the whole deal was a bit dodgy and for a lot of money. He just never lived up to the expectation of the fee.
Boumsong would add absolutely nothing to the squad.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ROBBO on December 28, 2011, 08:25:37 AM
Trouble is once a player gets past thirty the injuries come more often and take longer to recover. It all depends what Lerners plan is (if he has one), If it's to get the season over without too much damage and the high earning non performers of the wage bill to enable him to rebuild in the summer fair enough, but if getting players like Boumsong is going to be the norm it would be very depressing.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on December 28, 2011, 09:31:31 AM
It all depends what Lerners plan is (if he has one), If it's to get the season over without too much damage and the high earning non performers of the wage bill to enable him to rebuild in the summer fair enough, but if getting players like Boumsong is going to be the norm it would be very depressing.

I agree with that.

When we get to next summer we'll have Heskey, Cuellar & Beye off the wagebill, which creates plenty of room for new signings, plus I can see one if Collins or Dunne going, and Gardner will have benefited from his loan period.  I'd also like to believe that the recent incoming money is there waiting until we have a capacity to spend it wages wise.  So lets keep our powder relatively dry this January, unless the right player comes along, and patch up where needed with loan signings.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on December 28, 2011, 09:51:49 AM
Boumsong coming in can only mean that we are letting Collins go IMO. Cuellar this close to the end of his deal will be too useful to let go in Jan as he covers right back.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: VillaZogmariner on December 28, 2011, 09:53:26 AM
I'd rather give Wiemann a chance than Fonz.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on December 28, 2011, 09:54:46 AM
I'd rather give Wiemann a chance than Fonz.

I agree.  Im surprised Weimann has not been given a proper chance yet
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on December 28, 2011, 10:41:44 AM
Yes, but he did well enough at Rangers and Lyon. McLeish knows him well as he signed him at Rangers so it wouldn't surprise me.

He's 32 so if he does come it would be a short term deal and experienced cover. If I recall correctly the whole deal was a bit dodgy and for a lot of money. He just never lived up to the expectation of the fee.
Boumsong would add absolutely nothing to the squad.

Except comedy.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on December 28, 2011, 10:45:42 AM
Imagine he and Dunne both have a ahem, funny game together....  :o



If we do let Collins go to MON for something silly like 6 million, then it would at least give us cash to spend on the midfield were Boumsong fairly cheap, although I can't see his wages being small.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on December 28, 2011, 11:06:46 AM
if we were to sell Collins for £6m and spend that on the midfield, I don't think we'd to worry about the likes of Boumsong.  The new guy, plus Herd when fit again, would allow Clark to be used at the back, along with the fit again Cuellar.  I think that'd be Ok for the rest of the season.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Irish villain on December 28, 2011, 11:08:03 AM
Boumsong? FFS.

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on December 28, 2011, 11:27:06 AM
Just read this article >>> http://tinyurl.com/cbzthvz>>> about Enda Stevens joining us in Jan and Mcleish saying that it will be a tough ask for him to dislodged Warnock from the left back position as he has been in "great form"?  Really?  I think Warnocj has been quite average for us and a liability at times.

Anyway, at least there will be some competition for that position.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JJ-AV on December 28, 2011, 11:54:03 AM
I've read that the McEcharan move to Bolton might be off as Bolton have Kakuta on loan - even though they're sending him back they're unable to loan 2 different players from the same club in one season.

So maybe he will come here? Not that I want him!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 28, 2011, 11:57:01 AM
If Boumsong is the sort of player AM's after then i'd hesitate to give him any money. Crap, old, pointless.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on December 28, 2011, 12:00:51 PM
I've read that the McEcharan move to Bolton might be off as Bolton have Kakuta on loan - even though they're sending him back they're unable to loan 2 different players from the same club in one season.

So maybe he will come here? Not that I want him!

The daily mail said that Bolton have won the race to sign McEchran on loan as Gael Kakuta has now agreed to be loaned out to another club?  Is that even allowed?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SashasGrandad on December 28, 2011, 12:12:45 PM
I'd rather give Wiemann a chance than Fonz.

So would I - he could suprise a few if given a chance at Chelski.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ADVILLAFAN on December 28, 2011, 01:00:40 PM
If Boumsong is the sort of player AM's after then i'd hesitate to give him any money. Crap, old, pointless.

I was reading this thread for ages thinking 'well he's not great, but suppose he'd do a job'. Then I realised that it's Boumsong and not Bassong that everyone is on about. A player not good enough for Newcastle's backline!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: mrfuse on December 28, 2011, 01:15:03 PM
if we were to sell Collins for £6m and spend that on the midfield, I don't think we'd to worry about the likes of Boumsong.  The new guy, plus Herd when fit again, would allow Clark to be used at the back, along with the fit again Cuellar.  I think that'd be Ok for the rest of the season.

Yes I agree Id rather spend the money in midfield I don't rate Collins and happily see him go for £6M.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Davey B on December 28, 2011, 02:10:44 PM
If Boumsong is the sort of player AM's after then i'd hesitate to give him any money. Crap, old, pointless.

I was reading this thread for ages thinking 'well he's not great, but suppose he'd do a job'. Then I realised that it's Boumsong and not Bassong that everyone is on about. A player not good enough for Newcastle's backline!


Did McLeish have Boumsong at Rangers with him? I think thats where the skunks signed him from!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on December 28, 2011, 02:47:57 PM
If Alex is surplus to requirements at Chelsea we could do worse.
We might get him on loan or cheap as they want him off their books.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on December 28, 2011, 02:58:03 PM
Alex would be a very good addition i think but i cant imagine him taking a pay cut to come to us.  Im pretty sure he will be on high wages there and we are looking to reduce ours
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on December 28, 2011, 03:03:55 PM
If we were to sell Collins and release Cuellar in the summer, then him plus Dunne and Clark, with Baker as fourth choice, would be excellent.  I'm sure wages could be worked out given we're probably paying the other two upwards of £70k a week.  The question is would he come to us or have better offers elsewhere?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on December 28, 2011, 03:31:27 PM
If we were to sell Collins and release Cuellar in the summer, then him plus Dunne and Clark, with Baker as fourth choice, would be excellent.  I'm sure wages could be worked out given we're probably paying the other two upwards of £70k a week.  The question is would he come to us or have better offers elsewhere?

He would probably get better offers elsewhere
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on December 28, 2011, 03:42:30 PM
Alex is on for Arsenal isn't he? Would be a good move for both you would think.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on December 28, 2011, 03:45:43 PM
Alex is on for Arsenal isn't he?

I think they were after him in the summer, but not sure if signing Mertesacker changes things?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on December 28, 2011, 06:25:42 PM
They are light at back though still I reckon, with Koschenly or whatever he is called finally not looking a total liability by playing full back. Djorou, Squillachi are both poor realistically, Gibbs and Santos are out for the next few weeks, and Vermaelen is made of glass. Alex would be a good addition there, or indeed at United.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SoccerHQ on December 28, 2011, 06:56:39 PM
When Baker's loan is up at Millwall, I'd just recall him and have him as the cover on the bench rather than get in someone like Boumsong.

He did o.k in the games he played last season apart from Wolves at home so I'd rather do that then sign more 30 + players on big money.

We have enough defenders/utility players to last us till the end of the season even if we sell Collins and in any case the awful way McLeish organises us means we'll never ship that many goals in whoever the back 4 is.

Top priority in Jan needs to be a decent central midfielder.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Clampy on December 28, 2011, 06:59:33 PM
There's only 2 players i'd consider getting rid of in January and they're Beye and Heskey. I'd keep everyone else until the summer then do whatever needs doing then.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: BedsVillain on December 28, 2011, 08:18:24 PM
There's only 2 players i'd consider getting rid of in January and they're Beye and Heskey. I'd keep everyone else until the summer then do whatever needs doing then.

The only other player I'd add is Ireland, I'm not sure if we're ever going to see the best of him. So if an offer of around £4m comes knocking I hope we take it. His wages alone would finance 2-3 up and coming, hungry youngsters or someone from the French/Dutch/Lower leagues. 
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: KRS on December 28, 2011, 08:21:00 PM
I would take Dempsey with glee, but he would be way too expensive to make it a deal worth doing, and he must be 28 ish now.

I would much prefer the club adopt a stance of no incoming player, unless on a free and thus only costing wages on a maximum 3 year deal, being over the age of 26, preferably under 24. Thus giving time to grow, good sell on value and an opportunity to develop a team.

Agree with that.  I'd prefer that we offered "dempsey's" transfer fee and wages to a player like Hoillet.  He may not be as good right now but has the potential to get even better and crucially will have a much higher sell on value in the future, whether that be Bolton or Barcelona buying him from us.
Dempsey is the kind of player we should be in the market for right now...creativity battling midfielder and contributes with his fair share of goals. His age is a non issue if we can get him at the right price. £7-10m would be a fair deal.

Theres no point signing young players without having experienced quality players around them. I would also like Hoillet but cant see Blackburn letting him go on the cheap even with just a few months remaining on his contract. He'd be a great addition and could be an Ashley Young type signing.

Try and get them both but a player like Dempsey is what we really need right now.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SoccerHQ on December 28, 2011, 08:28:38 PM
Dempsey's a good player but I'd say 7-10m would be a bit steep for him.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: olaftab on December 28, 2011, 08:34:47 PM
I think we should stay put in this transfer window. No point in dragging in some cast offs. Best to move some players on and make a plan for  the summer.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: BedsVillain on December 28, 2011, 09:35:54 PM
Reports circulating Twitter that Nigerian international right back Chibuzor Okonkwo has been given permission to leave the Super Eagles training camp to have a trial with us. From a small amount of research, he's 23 and has had numerous trials before but never left Africa. Well at least it seems we're looking for some inexpensive hidden gems. Would prefer that to the likes of Boumsong, Zamora or Steven Davis!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on December 28, 2011, 09:43:58 PM
Whats he like on football manager Beds?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: BedsVillain on December 28, 2011, 09:51:31 PM
Whats he like on football manager Beds?

Not a clue Ozz, all my ill informed information comes from Transfer Markt and Twitter. I could dust down my '98 copy of Championship Manager but I think the lad was still sucking his mothers tits back then.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Hoppo on December 28, 2011, 10:06:18 PM
Just did a quick search on him. Only in  Nigerian squad because he {allegedly} shared bonus with coach. Sounds promising!!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: hawkeye on December 28, 2011, 10:47:21 PM
I am guessing that the Club is being run on a cash not a balance sheet basis, this means we are likely to ship out players below thier value to generate cash and only bring in players on lower wages for minmal transfer outlay. This narrows our market somewhat.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: olaftab on December 29, 2011, 12:32:30 AM
I'll be gutted if MON steals Bobby from right under our nose but hey how can we compete with him... After all he is a GIANT of a manager.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: timeoutbigbar on December 29, 2011, 01:35:28 AM
Wasn't Okonkwo a character from a book often studied in literature?  Not one of my better assignments, so I can't be sure.  Think he was a tribal African though, not sure about his footballing ability.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: timeoutbigbar on December 29, 2011, 01:36:39 AM
Dempsey's a good player but I'd say 7-10m would be a bit steep for him.

I'm sure Fulham fans would laugh at the figure for very different reasons.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: adrenachrome on December 29, 2011, 03:08:12 AM
Reports circulating Twitter that Nigerian international right back Chibuzor Okonkwo has been given permission to leave the Super Eagles training camp to have a trial with us. From a small amount of research, he's 23 and has had numerous trials before but never left Africa. Well at least it seems we're looking for some inexpensive hidden gems. Would prefer that to the likes of Boumsong, Zamora or Steven Davis!

Nigerian Tribune (http://www.tribune.com.ng/index.php/sports/33503-okonkwo-on-trials-at-aston-villa)

Quote
Okonkwo on trials at Aston Villa

Thursday, 29 December 2011
hare

NIGERIA international defender Chibuzor Okonkwo is currently undergoing trials at English Premier League club Aston Villa, officials have disclosed.

According to an official statement by the media officer of the Super Eagles, Ben Alaiya, the Heartland right full back has been released by coach Stephen Keshi to attend the Aston Villa trials.

The 23-year-old defender has established himself as top choice right back for the Super Eagles this outgoing year.

The former Bayelsa United star is solid defensively, loves to join the attack and packs a good shot.

He only recently boasted that he is Nigeria’s best right back.

He has fully recovered from a thigh injury which stopped him from featuring for Heartland in the final of this year’s Federation cup in September.

He has already undergone trials in France, Turkey and Ukraine.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: spaf on December 29, 2011, 04:20:59 AM
He only recently boasted that he is Nigeria’s best right back.

That's the best sentence I've read in a news article for a long time. Honest, straightforward and to the point.

I like Okonkwo.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: placeforparks on December 29, 2011, 05:46:59 AM
23 years old? i think he had the same paper round as kanu and obafemi martins.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ROBBO on December 29, 2011, 08:13:25 AM
So he's had three trials at other clubs with no takers, sounds like one of ours doesn't he.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: avfcpg on December 29, 2011, 09:38:48 AM
Just did a quick search on him. Only in  Nigerian squad because he {allegedly} shared bonus with coach. Sounds promising!!

He'll probably go to Spurs then...;-)
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulTheVillan on December 29, 2011, 09:52:51 AM
Thought Kayal was good last night for Celtic, very energetic in the middle.

Was we linked with him earlier in the year?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Holtemeister on December 29, 2011, 09:59:47 AM
Wasn't Okonkwo a character from a book often studied in literature?  Not one of my better assignments, so I can't be sure.  Think he was a tribal African though, not sure
about his footballing ability.



dont be stupid ..... he was a womble !
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on December 29, 2011, 10:03:38 AM
I think we should stay put in this transfer window. No point in dragging in some cast offs. Best to move some players on and make a plan for  the summer.

Made the same point yesterday.  The players we'll shed from our wagebill in the summer gives us greater options, so what I don;t want to see is those options limited by taking on more Sidwells or Beyes.  The exception is a decent loan signing, probably in midfield, and I'd hope Randy would be flexible enough to sanction a permanent deal if the right player were to become available.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Andy_Lochhead_in_the_air on December 29, 2011, 10:12:22 AM
Enda Stevens to sign shortly.

 http://sportinglife.aol.co.uk/football/news/article/23631/7399840/enda-stevens-heading-to-villa

Quote
29th December 2011, 07:06am

Left-back Enda Stevens will officially link up with Aston Villa next week and activate the three-year contract he agreed with the club in the summer.

The Republic of Ireland Under-21 international was allowed to remain with Shamrock for the first half of the campaign and compete in the Europa League before moving to Villa in January.

And boss Alex McLeish is hoping Stevens can quickly adjust to the demands of the Premier League and provide competition for Stephen Warnock.

He said: "It will be nice to have another body in the squad and Enda is a player who has got some potential.

"He's a young player, there was a wee bit of interest in him and we decided to sign him.

"It is up to Enda to hit the ground running and do well and leave me thinking: 'let's get this guy involved.'

"Enda will have to go some way to break in because Stephen Warnock has been in great form.

"But we are hoping when he joins, he will get to grips with everything, adapt very quickly to put pressure on guys like Stephen."

Stevens, who signed a pre-contract agreement, will officially become a Villa player when the transfer window reopens on Monday.

The Dublin born player had spells with UCD and St Patrick's Athletic before joining Shamrock in December 2009 and helping them to win the league title at the end of his first season.

Stevens made his Under-21 debut against Cyprus 10 months ago.


Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Clampy on December 29, 2011, 11:59:33 AM
A gamble on Jordan Rhodes anyone? Not sure how much Huddersfield would want, but would he worth a punt?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 29, 2011, 12:13:35 PM
Bolton Wanderers manager Owen Coyle is prepared to use a percentage of any money received for the sale of Gary Cahill to Chelsea on a direct replacement and has pinpointed Aston Villa and former Manchester City defender Richard Dunne.

The Republic of Ireland international has just turned 32 years of age and as Alex McLeish begins to try and rebuild an Aston Villa side that have lost key players over the last 6 months is well prepared to allow the experienced defender depart if the price be right enough.

At his current age though McLeish realises that there will not be too many high bids coming in for Dunne but the club are expecting a generous offer from Bolton which should give McLeish the extra cash required to add to his squad.

Bolton meanwhile will be looking to add an experienced head at the back when they do lose Cahill and feel that Dunne could be the man to drag them out from the depths of relegation. Bolton boss Owen Coyle is also looking to add at least another two players to his squad in January.



god i'd love this to happen just to see Dunne's face.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on December 29, 2011, 12:17:21 PM
Really can't see that happening.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Clampy on December 29, 2011, 12:18:56 PM
Will we be seeing any of the Cahill transfer fee?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TaxDodger on December 29, 2011, 12:45:30 PM
Can't we just swap Dunne for Cahill?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on December 29, 2011, 01:05:31 PM
I wouldn't swap Cahill for Dunne to be honest. It would weaken us defensively and we don't need that.

Dunne is actually in good form and unlike Cahill is an accomplished defender.
Cahill is completely overrated because he's not too bad on the ball but his defending and positioning is a bit suspect in my opinion.
I'd swap Cahill for Collins but that's not ever going to happen either because, in any case, Bolton will quite rightly cash in on the legend of Cahill because the reality is he's not "all that". He goes walkabout so often he makes Mick Dundee look like a slob.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulTheVillan on December 29, 2011, 01:23:49 PM
www.twitter.com/miketaylorwm

#avfc McLeish is expecting Darren Bent to be fit for Saturday. Says club policy on transfers unchanged - not allowed to increase wage bill.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: alan_clarke on December 29, 2011, 01:27:05 PM
Enda Stevens to sign shortly.

 http://sportinglife.aol.co.uk/football/news/article/23631/7399840/enda-stevens-heading-to-villa

Quote
29th December 2011, 07:06am



"Enda will have to go some way to break in because Stephen Warnock has been in great form.



Yeah, right.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Irish villain on December 29, 2011, 01:31:02 PM
Richard Dunne had a few bad games fr villa last season but otherwise has been a good player for us and, as seen in the Euro qualifying campaign, can be world class on his day.

Collins is the weak link of our defence and has been for some time. Getting rid of Dunne would be absolute lunacy. We have enough problems without adding to them. If our defence needs rebuilding, I'd rather it was done in the summer than in the middle of a tough season.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on December 29, 2011, 01:36:50 PM
I could see them going for Dunne and us selling them Collins though.


Re Cahill, I think he is a really good player on his game, but for me rather than his positioning it is the amount he get bullied by big centre forwards that would worry, he seems to come off worse in the physical battle often, which considering he trains daily with Davies is a bit surprising now he has had time to fill out so to speak.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on December 29, 2011, 02:06:54 PM
Can't we just swap Dunne for Cahill?

Id rather swap Collins for Cahill but neither will happen as Cahill is off to Chelsea.
Also, I think Cahill is a very good player and is still learning alot and will improve especially if he is alongside better players.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Salsa Party Animal on December 29, 2011, 02:10:17 PM
Alex should say thank for offer for Richard, he is not for sale, but you can buy Collins for same price and we will chuck in Heskey for free :)
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: richard moore on December 29, 2011, 02:21:53 PM
I wouldn't swap Cahill for Dunne to be honest. It would weaken us defensively and we don't need that.

Dunne is actually in good form and unlike Cahill is an accomplished defender.
Cahill is completely overrated because he's not too bad on the ball but his defending and positioning is a bit suspect in my opinion.
I'd swap Cahill for Collins but that's not ever going to happen either because, in any case, Bolton will quite rightly cash in on the legend of Cahill because the reality is he's not "all that". He goes walkabout so often he makes Mick Dundee look like a slob.

Spot on as ever for me Mazrim, completely agree...though I do have a sneaking suspicion he could yet come good and be masterminding the Chelsea or Arsenal defence five years down the line. Not really his fault in many ways, he is not the first victim of the 'have half a dozen decent games, score a spectacular goal or two when the cameras there and suddenly you are worth £15m and an England place' syndrome by a long chalk...
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: KevinGage on December 29, 2011, 02:23:59 PM
I'd like to see at least one of them (Collins or Dunne)  move on, but -despite being older- there might be more hope for Dunne if we put him alongside a more mobile partner.

I'd be more inclined to stick with Clark in the midfield for the time being. There might be games where he struggles, but even our regular midfielders have done that. 

We look more secure with him there, I think both Collins and Dunne have benefitted from that. With Cuellar in place of Hutton, even more so.

So I could live with Dunne at the heart of our defence at least until the end of the season- unless we get a crazy offer that enables us to bring in a good replacement far quicker that we planned.  But I don't see any side offering big money for the Dunner in all honesty.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JJ-AV on December 29, 2011, 02:28:11 PM
Bent will go to Liverpool in Jan, I reckon.

Carroll in exchange or on loan. Gives McLeish the funds to sign a couple of players.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: sidcowans10 on December 29, 2011, 02:32:54 PM
Bent will go to Liverpool in Jan, I reckon.

Carroll in exchange or on loan. Gives McLeish the funds to sign a couple of players.

I hope your wrong...but have a horrible feeling you're not!!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on December 29, 2011, 02:36:26 PM
I'd like to see Clark as Petrov's long term replacement as a defensive midfielder.  He seems very comfortable on the ball and can pass as well as defend.  He also offers height which we have lacked in recent history.  I think he just needs to bulk up a bit.  Maybe him and Gardner/Herd are the future central midfield partners?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: olaftab on December 29, 2011, 02:37:01 PM
I was very impressed with James Forrest last night. £2m plus Heskey and Beye to Celtic?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Tokyo Sexwhale on December 29, 2011, 02:37:09 PM
Darren Bent to Liverpool is all over Twitter now.

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on December 29, 2011, 02:39:01 PM
Bent will go to Liverpool in Jan, I reckon.

Carroll in exchange or on loan. Gives McLeish the funds to sign a couple of players.

I hope your wrong...but have a horrible feeling you're not!!

I really hope youre wrong especailly as the club/manager have come out and said he will not be sold in Jan.  But saying that, every player has a price and I can see villa getting very giddy should they receive an offer in exces of £20m.  It would be a real shame if we get rid of a proven premiership goal scorer - something we have been crying out for since Yorke.
Rumours are that Bent to QPR is a done deal - again I hope that that is just a rumour and nothing more.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Irish villain on December 29, 2011, 02:49:23 PM
These are indeed embarrassing days to be a villa fan. Do the board have any sense of self respect?

If Bent is sold, every single penny better be spent on genuine quality.

The nightmare continues. When will we be able to wake up?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on December 29, 2011, 02:49:23 PM
Defensively, I'd be happy to see Clark there alongside Dunne.  However, if Cahill is going to Chelsea I'd like us to try for Alex, which would mean him and Dunne with Clark staying in midfield.  That in front of a good keeper like Given would giv us a great spine to the team and we could build from there.  Also, I'd be OK with collins staying around as cover, mainly for Dunne, but if a decent offer comes in then so be it.   

If Bent gets sold the whole atmosphere around the club, which i think has picked up a bit the last two games, will go through the floor.  Not very good teams who sell their best player usually end up getting relegated.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on December 29, 2011, 02:59:08 PM
What would it take? I reckon near on 30 million, and no one will pay it. Liverpool won't pay out that money on another striker unless they let Carroll go, and if they offer Carroll and Shelvey in a swap then it would be interesting to see what we do. I would hope turn it down, but we will see.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on December 29, 2011, 02:59:47 PM
These are indeed embarrassing days to be a villa fan. Do the board have any sense of self respect?

If Bent is sold, every single penny better be spent on genuine quality.

The nightmare continues. When will we be able to wake up?

I've never been embarrassed by being a Villa fan but each to their own I suppose. Why are you getting so upset over a Twitter rumour?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Clampy on December 29, 2011, 03:03:55 PM
Maybe Liverpool want to give us Downing back.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: avfc_1874 on December 29, 2011, 03:04:38 PM
The rumours have started from this article http://www.clickliverpool.com/sport/liverpool-fc/1215036-liverpool-fc-make-enquiry-for-aston-villa-striker-darren-bent.html (http://www.clickliverpool.com/sport/liverpool-fc/1215036-liverpool-fc-make-enquiry-for-aston-villa-striker-darren-bent.html)
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on December 29, 2011, 03:06:27 PM
Just seen a tweet from Brendan McLoughlin ( a midlands journo) saying that those rumours about Bent to LFC are untrue.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on December 29, 2011, 03:09:12 PM
Maybe Liverpool want to give us Downing back.

I know that N'Zogbia hasn't quite worked out yet, but has Downing even got an assist for Liverpool this season? He seems a pale shadow of the player he was with us.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Irish villain on December 29, 2011, 03:09:47 PM
These are indeed embarrassing days to be a villa fan. Do the board have any sense of self respect?

If Bent is sold, every single penny better be spent on genuine quality.

The nightmare continues. When will we be able to wake up?

I've never been embarrassed by being a Villa fan but each to their own I suppose. Why are you getting so upset over a Twitter rumour?

I'm not embarrassed to be a villa fan, I'm proud. Bad choice of words.

There's just an inevitability about our plight now. Any good players we have get picked off. I can see this deal happening. I really can. We all can. We have 20 points on the board and facing into the second part of the season without our main goal threat would make staying up quite a challenge.

We have had nothing only bad news since May 2010 and still McLeish is talking about needing to reduce the wage bill having alread let many big earners go. It's a disastrous policy.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on December 29, 2011, 03:10:27 PM
Maybe Liverpool want to give us Downing back.

I know that N'Zogbia hasn't quite worked out yet, but has Downing even got an assist for Liverpool this season? He seems a pale shadow of the player he was with us.

I know - great, isn't it?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulTheVillan on December 29, 2011, 03:10:41 PM
I could see Bent forcing this move if the interest was true from Liverpool.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Chris Smith on December 29, 2011, 03:11:14 PM
These are indeed embarrassing days to be a villa fan. Do the board have any sense of self respect?

If Bent is sold, every single penny better be spent on genuine quality.

The nightmare continues. When will we be able to wake up?

At this time of the season there are a million different rumours and 99.9% of them are completely unfounded. For your own sanity don't take any notice of them.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Irish villain on December 29, 2011, 03:12:28 PM
Just seen a tweet from Brendan McLoughlin ( a midlands journo) saying that those rumours about Bent to LFC are untrue.

There were lots of denials about Downing too. I just hope we hang onto Bent, we've needed a player like him for as long as I've been a villa fan. We need some stability at the club and it'd be nice to get a few years service out of our top players.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on December 29, 2011, 03:13:16 PM
Does anyone have any idea of how much we have reduced the wage bill per week, by?
Who are still the high earners ?  Heskey, Beye, Collins, Dunne, Petrov, Warnock & BENT?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulTheVillan on December 29, 2011, 03:13:54 PM
Does anyone have any idea of how much we have reduced the wage bill per week, by?
Who are still the high earners ?  Heskey, Beye, Collins, Dunne, Petrov, Warnock & BENT?
Ireland, Gabby & Given are up there I'd imagine.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on December 29, 2011, 03:14:03 PM
These are indeed embarrassing days to be a villa fan. Do the board have any sense of self respect?

If Bent is sold, every single penny better be spent on genuine quality.

The nightmare continues. When will we be able to wake up?

I've never been embarrassed by being a Villa fan but each to their own I suppose. Why are you getting so upset over a Twitter rumour?

I'm not embarrassed to be a villa fan, I'm proud. Bad choice of words.

There's just an inevitability about our plight now. Any good players we have get picked off. I can see this deal happening. I really can. We all can. We have 20 points on the board and facing into the second part of the season without our main goal threat would make staying up quite a challenge.

We have had nothing only bad news since May 2010 and still McLeish is talking about needing to reduce the wage bill having alread let many big earners go. It's a disastrous policy.

Well, since May 2010 we've signed N'Zogbia and Bent himself, so it's not been 100% one way.  Plus lets not forget that NOBODY has been forced out - all the players that have left have wanted to go.  Although I suppose the 'why' of them wanting to leave is a concern.  And finally, we don't need to reduce the wagebill any further from what AM has said - we just need to keep it where it is now, presumably until turnover increases to the point the ratio allows wages to also.


Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Irish villain on December 29, 2011, 03:15:16 PM
These are indeed embarrassing days to be a villa fan. Do the board have any sense of self respect?

If Bent is sold, every single penny better be spent on genuine quality.

The nightmare continues. When will we be able to wake up?

At this time of the season there are a million different rumours and 99.9% of them are completely unfounded. For your own sanity don't take any notice of them.

Sound advice, normally. But in this situation I'm especially worried because of the way Bent has been deployed by McLeish, the continued talk of reducing the wage bill.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulTheVillan on December 29, 2011, 03:15:21 PM
The problem is we can't force people out.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on December 29, 2011, 03:17:49 PM
Just seen a tweet from Brendan McLoughlin ( a midlands journo) saying that those rumours about Bent to LFC are untrue.

There were lots of denials about Downing too. I just hope we hang onto Bent, we've needed a player like him for as long as I've been a villa fan. We need some stability at the club and it'd be nice to get a few years service out of our top players.

I agree.  I've seen some villa fans tweeting saying we should get rid of him because he is on high wages and he doesn;t want to be at the club blah blah blah.  So we cry out for a goal scorer, love him when he signed for us and banged in goals which helped us stay up and the moment the waters get a bit rough, they want him out?  moron's I say! 
We should be building a team around him as we all know he can score 20 goals in a season but I can see a bid coming in for him in Jan which will make Villa and the AM think twice. 
Only problem with selling bent is how much of that money will AM get to reinvest?  I mean, he didn't really get that much from the sale of Downing and Young did he?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: timeoutbigbar on December 29, 2011, 03:19:17 PM
Yes we've needed a goalscorer like Bent for ages, but if the calibre of creative player we are currently fielding is any indication of where the club is heading, we would probably be better suited to having a bit of a workhorse upfront (Gabby for instance).  Is it a coincidence that we have started playing a better style of football since Bent has been out?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulTheVillan on December 29, 2011, 03:20:45 PM
Yes we've needed a goalscorer like Bent for ages, but if the calibre of creative player we are currently fielding is any indication of where the club is heading, we would probably be better suited to having a bit of a workhorse upfront (Gabby for instance).  Is it a coincidence that we have started playing a better style of football since Bent has been out?

One game, v Arsenal and Gabby was toss.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on December 29, 2011, 03:25:23 PM
When Bent was last in the side we weren't playing Albrighton and N'Zogbia's form was poor.  They're both now delivering, so when he returns the creativity issue shouldn't be a problem at all!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on December 29, 2011, 03:28:27 PM
Does anyone have any idea of how much we have reduced the wage bill per week, by?
Who are still the high earners ?  Heskey, Beye, Collins, Dunne, Petrov, Warnock & BENT?
Ireland, Gabby & Given are up there I'd imagine.

Ahhh I forgot about Mr Ireland. But I cant see us getting rid of Ireland considering AM signed him. Im refering to the high eaners who we want off our wage bill.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulTheVillan on December 29, 2011, 03:28:48 PM
When Bent was last in the side we weren't playing Albrighton and N'Zogbia's form was poor.  They're both now delivering, so when he returns the creativity issue shouldn't be a problem at all!
Agreed.
Look at the Bolton game, Bent had numerous chances & that was the first game of 4-4-2.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulTheVillan on December 29, 2011, 03:29:35 PM
Does anyone have any idea of how much we have reduced the wage bill per week, by?
Who are still the high earners ?  Heskey, Beye, Collins, Dunne, Petrov, Warnock & BENT?
Ireland, Gabby & Given are up there I'd imagine.

Ahhh I forgot about Mr Ireland. But I cant see us getting rid of Ireland considering AM signed him. Im refering to the high eaners who we want off our wage bill.
Wrong.

AM didn't sign Ireland. He came in when we sold Milner & didn't have a manager in place. Even though it was rumoured MON wanted him.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on December 29, 2011, 03:35:05 PM
Does anyone have any idea of how much we have reduced the wage bill per week, by?
Who are still the high earners ?  Heskey, Beye, Collins, Dunne, Petrov, Warnock & BENT?

OK - lets try and work this out starting from last summer when Milner went and excluding loans:-

Out
Milner - £60k
Shorey - £40k
NRC - £50k
Downing - £60k
A Young - £60k
Davies - £40k
Sidwell - £50k
Freidel - £50k
L Young - £50k
Have I forgotten anyone?
Total - £450k a week

In
Ireland - £60k (heard he acceopted Milner's wages)
Bent - £80k
Hutton - £40k
Given - £60k
N'Zogbia - £60k
Total - £240k

So I make it an almost £11m a year saving from where we were during our wages height under MON
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on December 29, 2011, 03:38:12 PM
Yes we've needed a goalscorer like Bent for ages, but if the calibre of creative player we are currently fielding is any indication of where the club is heading, we would probably be better suited to having a bit of a workhorse upfront (Gabby for instance).  Is it a coincidence that we have started playing a better style of football since Bent has been out?

Dont all shoot me down at once but Im not really a Gabby fan.  Yes he is a workhorse but he is too inconsistent for my liking.  Ok, he is a local lad and tries but he is not clinical in front of goal for me.  Im not saying sell him or anything but just saying that I dont really see him as the "future" of Aston Villa.  He is the type of player that if he has too much time to think about something he messes it up.  There was an example of this against Stoke in the first half where he wont he ball in their half and ran towards goal, as he was doing this, I said to my missus "watch him mess this up" and he didn't let me down.  Also, he keeps doing what Wayne Rooney does for Man Utd when he plays up front - he will come deep to collect the ball. I would prefer him not to do that and to be more of a nuisance in the box.  Ive seen him on numerous occasions on the wing to collect a ball and then will pass it short to another player and then just hang about there.  Now, Ive also seen Bent do the same thing but as soon as he makes that pass, he makes that run towards the box to get into a goal scoring position.  I wish Gabby would have that same mentality to in the mix and poach a few more goals for us.  This is just my opinion and many of u may disagree with me, but hey, I guess we are all entitled to it.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: timeoutbigbar on December 29, 2011, 03:38:48 PM
Yes we've needed a goalscorer like Bent for ages, but if the calibre of creative player we are currently fielding is any indication of where the club is heading, we would probably be better suited to having a bit of a workhorse upfront (Gabby for instance).  Is it a coincidence that we have started playing a better style of football since Bent has been out?

One game, v Arsenal and Gabby was toss.

Fair point, but he isn't normally that poor.

Also take John M's point about the form of Nzog and Albrighton, long may that continue.  I just hope Darren hasn't had his head turned by the rumours.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on December 29, 2011, 03:39:57 PM
Does anyone have any idea of how much we have reduced the wage bill per week, by?
Who are still the high earners ?  Heskey, Beye, Collins, Dunne, Petrov, Warnock & BENT?
Ireland, Gabby & Given are up there I'd imagine.

Ahhh I forgot about Mr Ireland. But I cant see us getting rid of Ireland considering AM signed him. Im refering to the high eaners who we want off our wage bill.
Wrong.

AM didn't sign Ireland. He came in when we sold Milner & didn't have a manager in place. Even though it was rumoured MON wanted him.

OOOPS!  Yes I am wrong,  I have AM on the Brain at the mo!  :-[ 
Ireland was defo a signing before AM arrived so not sure why I even typed that. 
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on December 29, 2011, 03:41:45 PM
Does anyone have any idea of how much we have reduced the wage bill per week, by?
Who are still the high earners ?  Heskey, Beye, Collins, Dunne, Petrov, Warnock & BENT?

OK - lets try and work this out starting from last summer when Milner went and excluding loans:-

Out
Milner - £60k
Shorey - £40k
NRC - £50k
Downing - £60k
A Young - £60k
Davies - £40k
Sidwell - £50k
Freidel - £50k
L Young - £50k
Have I forgotten anyone?
Total - £450k a week

In
Ireland - £60k (heard he acceopted Milner's wages)
Bent - £80k
Hutton - £40k
Given - £60k
N'Zogbia - £60k
Total - £240k

So I make it an almost £11m a year saving from where we were during our wages height under MON

It is rumoured that Bent is on alot more that £80k per week.  More like £110k p/w plus bonuses.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TheSandman on December 29, 2011, 03:43:56 PM
So what's that us down to 'only' £58million a year or so?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on December 29, 2011, 03:44:07 PM
It is rumoured that Bent is on alot more that £80k per week.  More like £110k p/w plus bonuses.

It's also rumoured that the 9/11 attacks were staged by the CIA, but I seriously can't see either being true!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dante Lavelli on December 29, 2011, 03:48:04 PM
It is rumoured that Bent is on alot more that £80k per week.  More like £110k p/w plus bonuses.

Jesus, no wonder he was quick to dump sunderland.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Chris Smith on December 29, 2011, 03:48:08 PM
When Bent was last in the side we weren't playing Albrighton and N'Zogbia's form was poor.  They're both now delivering, so when he returns the creativity issue shouldn't be a problem at all!

The one game he did play with them, Bolton, he missed two sitters and a couple of other half chances. Which was probably more than he'd had in the previous 4 games combined.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on December 29, 2011, 03:51:21 PM
When Bent was last in the side we weren't playing Albrighton and N'Zogbia's form was poor.  They're both now delivering, so when he returns the creativity issue shouldn't be a problem at all!

The one game he did play with them, Bolton, he missed two sitters and a couple of other half chances. Which was probably more than he'd had in the previous 4 games combined.

Exactly.  I consider that game just an off day for him, but it's just sods law that we seemed to have solved the service problem just in time for him to be out injured.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on December 29, 2011, 03:52:15 PM
When Bent was last in the side we weren't playing Albrighton and N'Zogbia's form was poor.  They're both now delivering, so when he returns the creativity issue shouldn't be a problem at all!


It is a good point, and shows how effective with him and them in the same side he can still be, as Bent in form will score more often than not.
The one game he did play with them, Bolton, he missed two sitters and a couple of other half chances. Which was probably more than he'd had in the previous 4 games combined.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on December 29, 2011, 03:52:46 PM
When Bent was last in the side we weren't playing Albrighton and N'Zogbia's form was poor.  They're both now delivering, so when he returns the creativity issue shouldn't be a problem at all!

The one game he did play with them, Bolton, he missed two sitters and a couple of other half chances. Which was probably more than he'd had in the previous 4 games combined.

You're right but atleast he gets into those positions.  We cant right Bent off as we all know he is more than capable of burying the ball into the back of the net.  All strikers will go through a goal drought but then start scoring freely again once they bag a couple in quick sucsession.  This doesn't count for all strikers though i.e. Torres!  He cant buy a goal at the mo even though he went on that run and scored a few in a short period of time
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: teamvillage on December 29, 2011, 03:53:25 PM
Does anyone have any idea of how much we have reduced the wage bill per week, by?
Who are still the high earners ?  Heskey, Beye, Collins, Dunne, Petrov, Warnock & BENT?

OK - lets try and work this out starting from last summer when Milner went and excluding loans:-

Out
Milner - £60k
Shorey - £40k
NRC - £50k
Downing - £60k
A Young - £60k
Davies - £40k
Sidwell - £50k
Freidel - £50k
L Young - £50k
Have I forgotten anyone?
Total - £450k a week

In
Ireland - £60k (heard he acceopted Milner's wages)
Bent - £80k
Hutton - £40k
Given - £60k
N'Zogbia - £60k
Total - £240k

So I make it an almost £11m a year saving from where we were during our wages height under MON

It is rumoured that Bent is on alot more that £80k per week.  More like £110k p/w plus bonuses.

The problem with exercises like this is that you miss all the players who have been given new & improved contracts. We've several who will have stepped up from youth team money to first team money over the last year (Bannan, Herd etc).
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on December 29, 2011, 03:55:13 PM
The birmingham mail said the week that Bannan was on £10k a week so I would guess that Herd would be on the same if not there abouts??
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Chris Smith on December 29, 2011, 03:55:42 PM
Yes we've needed a goalscorer like Bent for ages, but if the calibre of creative player we are currently fielding is any indication of where the club is heading, we would probably be better suited to having a bit of a workhorse upfront (Gabby for instance).  Is it a coincidence that we have started playing a better style of football since Bent has been out?

Dont all shoot me down at once but Im not really a Gabby fan.  Yes he is a workhorse but he is too inconsistent for my liking.  Ok, he is a local lad and tries but he is not clinical in front of goal for me.  Im not saying sell him or anything but just saying that I dont really see him as the "future" of Aston Villa.  He is the type of player that if he has too much time to think about something he messes it up.  There was an example of this against Stoke in the first half where he wont he ball in their half and ran towards goal, as he was doing this, I said to my missus "watch him mess this up" and he didn't let me down.  Also, he keeps doing what Wayne Rooney does for Man Utd when he plays up front - he will come deep to collect the ball. I would prefer him not to do that and to be more of a nuisance in the box.  Ive seen him on numerous occasions on the wing to collect a ball and then will pass it short to another player and then just hang about there.  Now, Ive also seen Bent do the same thing but as soon as he makes that pass, he makes that run towards the box to get into a goal scoring position.  I wish Gabby would have that same mentality to in the mix and poach a few more goals for us.  This is just my opinion and many of u may disagree with me, but hey, I guess we are all entitled to it.

BANG BANG *blows imaginary smoke from fingers*
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dante Lavelli on December 29, 2011, 03:58:25 PM
So what's that us down to 'only' £58million a year or so?

What is Delloit's target % of wages vs turnover?  50%?
That would mean we need a turnover of 116m whereas I think the last reported turnover was 84m.

So we just need to double our turnover and we'll be fine!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: lichfield lion on December 29, 2011, 04:03:49 PM
Yes we've needed a goalscorer like Bent for ages, but if the calibre of creative player we are currently fielding is any indication of where the club is heading, we would probably be better suited to having a bit of a workhorse upfront (Gabby for instance).  Is it a coincidence that we have started playing a better style of football since Bent has been out?

Dont all shoot me down at once but Im not really a Gabby fan.  Yes he is a workhorse but he is too inconsistent for my liking.  Ok, he is a local lad and tries but he is not clinical in front of goal for me.  Im not saying sell him or anything but just saying that I dont really see him as the "future" of Aston Villa.  He is the type of player that if he has too much time to think about something he messes it up.  There was an example of this against Stoke in the first half where he wont he ball in their half and ran towards goal, as he was doing this, I said to my missus "watch him mess this up" and he didn't let me down.  Also, he keeps doing what Wayne Rooney does for Man Utd when he plays up front - he will come deep to collect the ball. I would prefer him not to do that and to be more of a nuisance in the box.  Ive seen him on numerous occasions on the wing to collect a ball and then will pass it short to another player and then just hang about there.  Now, Ive also seen Bent do the same thing but as soon as he makes that pass, he makes that run towards the box to get into a goal scoring position.  I wish Gabby would have that same mentality to in the mix and poach a few more goals for us.  This is just my opinion and many of u may disagree with me, but hey, I guess we are all entitled to it.

BANG BANG *blows imaginary smoke from fingers*
He didn't let me down. Sounds like you wanted him to, just to prove how very clever you are. Gabby always gives his all and at times he terrifies the opposition with his pace and can be a great pressure relief outlet for us.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: hartman_1982 on December 29, 2011, 04:04:25 PM
It is rumoured that Bent is on alot more that £80k per week.  More like £110k p/w plus bonuses.

Jesus, no wonder he was quick to dump sunderland.
[/quote

Darren Bent will be on no where near 110k a week. He will be on somewhere in the region of 60k-80k a week tops. Villa never have and (for the foreseeable future) never will pay that type of money.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on December 29, 2011, 04:07:42 PM
When Bent was last in the side we weren't playing Albrighton and N'Zogbia's form was poor.  They're both now delivering, so when he returns the creativity issue shouldn't be a problem at all!

The one game he did play with them, Bolton, he missed two sitters and a couple of other half chances. Which was probably more than he'd had in the previous 4 games combined.

Exactly.  I consider that game just an off day for him, but it's just sods law that we seemed to have solved the service problem just in time for him to be out injured.

that's a massive point. The one thing he's lacked aside from Gabby is consistent service and he got it that day. On any other day, he's walking away with the match ball. Had he played against Arsenal with the chances we created that night we could have taken that game too. Figuring out how to get the ball to him, as much as getting N'Zogbia and Albrighton to play with confidence has been a big part of the learning curve this year coming off a season having had two of the best supply men in the PL.

The Bent rumours will never go away. We may as well get used to that. The bigger clubs have all had a chance to sign him over the years and haven't. He's got a long contract and is worth a lot of money. Not only will he be very expensive, but the club, I believe understand the wider implications of selling Bent. We bought him last season so that he'd get us out of similar situation to what we find ourselves in right now. We're not about to sell him.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on December 29, 2011, 04:10:28 PM
Maybe Liverpool want to give us Downing back.

I know that N'Zogbia hasn't quite worked out yet, but has Downing even got an assist for Liverpool this season? He seems a pale shadow of the player he was with us.

I know - great, isn't it?

What would be great John is if his form lasted through the season and he isn't picked for the European championships as well as not qualifying for the CL. That sir would be ace in every way.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on December 29, 2011, 04:18:43 PM
I see Henry has been offered a deal for 2 months by Arsenal. He's a great signing to bring off the bench even if he isn't the player he once was. I'm surprised given our Irish contingent that we've not done the same with Robbie Keane, a player that has been linked to us forever. He needs a club to play for to stay sharp ahead of the Euros and he'd be a lot more effective than having Heskey or Fonz on the bench.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on December 29, 2011, 04:22:46 PM
So what's that us down to 'only' £58million a year or so?

What is Delloit's target % of wages vs turnover?  50%?
That would mean we need a turnover of 116m whereas I think the last reported turnover was 84m.

So we just need to double our turnover and we'll be fine!

Thing is, what should a squad of 25 be paid?  If you take it as your 3 top boys are on £80k, the next level is 4 players on £60k, then the remainder of the first 11 4 on £50k.  You need to have a decent squad, so your top 3 reserves are on a par with the first team at £50k, with the rest of your usual bench averaging £35k.  After that, you'll be talking about cheap fioreigners and emerging kids at around £20k average for 7 players.

Does that sound reasonable for a non CL club who are trying to attain top 6 status?  Well, thats a total of £57,720,000 per year, with an average first team wage of £61k and squad average £44,400 per week.

So if we want to be that sort of side, and folow the 50% rule, then turnover should be £115,440,000, which is a 37% increase from where we are now.

If I'm honest I'm not sure what type of point I'm making here, other than these are probably the maths Randy & Co have been doing.

Or if we look at it the other way round, and wee what a £84m turnover can get us?  Again on the 50% basis we're looking at £42m, so if I use the same scale as above we'd be looking at a top earner of £58,212, with the first team and squad averages £44,387 and 332,308 respectively.  And that's firm mid table territory.   
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: hartman_1982 on December 29, 2011, 04:28:21 PM
So what's that us down to 'only' £58million a year or so?

What is Delloit's target % of wages vs turnover?  50%?
That would mean we need a turnover of 116m whereas I think the last reported turnover was 84m.

So we just need to double our turnover and we'll be fine!

Thing is, what should a squad of 25 be paid?  If you take it as your 3 top boys are on £80k, the next level is 4 players on £60k, then the remainder of the first 11 4 on £50k.  You need to have a decent squad, so your top 3 reserves are on a par with the first team at £50k, with the rest of your usual bench averaging £35k.  After that, you'll be talking about cheap fioreigners and emerging kids at around £20k average for 7 players.

Does that sound reasonable for a non CL club who are trying to attain top 6 status?  Well, thats a total of £57,720,000 per year, with an average first team wage of £61k and squad average £44,400 per week.

So if we want to be that sort of side, and folow the 50% rule, then turnover should be £115,440,000, which is a 37% increase from where we are now.

If I'm honest I'm not sure what type of point I'm making here, other than these are probably the maths Randy & Co have been doing.

Or if we look at it the other way round, and wee what a £84m turnover can get us?  Again on the 50% basis we're looking at £42m, so if I use the same scale as above we'd be looking at a top earner of £58,212, with the first team and squad averages £44,387 and 332,308 respectively.  And that's firm mid table territory.   

Your plan is completely floored because you do not want a bench filled with 35k a week players. You want it filled with your Bannan's, Herd's etc that are all on about 10k a week. That is why our academy needs to be used more wisely.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on December 29, 2011, 04:32:11 PM

He didn't let me down. Sounds like you wanted him to, just to prove how very clever you are. Gabby always gives his all and at times he terrifies the opposition with his pace and can be a great pressure relief outlet for us.
[/quote]

Nope, I dont want him to let me down, in fact I want him to do the exact opposite and go on a score a blinder or provide an assist.  I want gabby to be a villa legend, i want him to be a 20 goal a season striker but truth is that he wont be.  So he terrifies defenders with pace and then what?  How many times has he terrified them and go on to score goals or set up another player?  once or twice out of 20 attempts?
If gabby was SO good, why hasn't any of the bigger clubs made an enquiry or a concrete bid for him recently?  Like i said, I DONT want him to fail, I want him to prove doubters like me wrong so I can turn around and say "I was wrong". I dont want him to be another Stefan & Luke Moore or a Darius Vassell who had plenty of pace but lacked clinical finishing in front of goal.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on December 29, 2011, 04:32:14 PM
Your plan is completely floored because you do not want a bench filled with 35k a week players. You want it filled with your Bannan's, Herd's etc that are all on about 10k a week. That is why our academy needs to be used more wisely.

I agree the accademy kids need to be used more and better, but if you've got a 1st 11 and then just them, the strength in depth issue does come into play.  Plus, once they get established, we'll have their agents asking for parity with other members of the squad.  If we were to offer Albrighton a new contract now how much do you think he'd be looking for?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dave on December 29, 2011, 04:32:41 PM
It is rumoured that Bent is on alot more that £80k per week.  More like £110k p/w plus bonuses.
I've never seen or read anything to suggest that this is even close. Where is it rumoured exactly?

Most reports when we signed him suggested he was getting around £70k per week.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithesShin on December 29, 2011, 04:34:45 PM
I'd be absolutely stunned if we were paying Bent £110K a week.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dante Lavelli on December 29, 2011, 04:38:04 PM
So what's that us down to 'only' £58million a year or so?

What is Delloit's target % of wages vs turnover?  50%?
That would mean we need a turnover of 116m whereas I think the last reported turnover was 84m.

So we just need to double our turnover and we'll be fine!

Thing is, what should a squad of 25 be paid?  If you take it as your 3 top boys are on £80k, the next level is 4 players on £60k, then the remainder of the first 11 4 on £50k.  You need to have a decent squad, so your top 3 reserves are on a par with the first team at £50k, with the rest of your usual bench averaging £35k.  After that, you'll be talking about cheap fioreigners and emerging kids at around £20k average for 7 players.

Does that sound reasonable for a non CL club who are trying to attain top 6 status?  Well, thats a total of £57,720,000 per year, with an average first team wage of £61k and squad average £44,400 per week.

So if we want to be that sort of side, and folow the 50% rule, then turnover should be £115,440,000, which is a 37% increase from where we are now.

If I'm honest I'm not sure what type of point I'm making here, other than these are probably the maths Randy & Co have been doing.

Or if we look at it the other way round, and wee what a £84m turnover can get us?  Again on the 50% basis we're looking at £42m, so if I use the same scale as above we'd be looking at a top earner of £58,212, with the first team and squad averages £44,387 and 332,308 respectively.  And that's firm mid table territory.   

Your plan is completely floored because you do not want a bench filled with 35k a week players. You want it filled with your Bannan's, Herd's etc that are all on about 10k a week. That is why our academy needs to be used more wisely.

I think that is our only hope Hartman.  We HAVE to trust our youth system more.  We need a few more Herds and Clarks that can be first reserve for a number of positions then that will help (both their development and the financial bottom line).

Annoyingly, if you add 30m for the chumps league then we would not be far off being the model club from an accounting perspective.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SamTheMouse on December 29, 2011, 04:39:22 PM
Yes we've needed a goalscorer like Bent for ages, but if the calibre of creative player we are currently fielding is any indication of where the club is heading, we would probably be better suited to having a bit of a workhorse upfront (Gabby for instance).  Is it a coincidence that we have started playing a better style of football since Bent has been out?

Dont all shoot me down at once but Im not really a Gabby fan.  Yes he is a workhorse but he is too inconsistent for my liking.  Ok, he is a local lad and tries but he is not clinical in front of goal for me.  Im not saying sell him or anything but just saying that I dont really see him as the "future" of Aston Villa.  He is the type of player that if he has too much time to think about something he messes it up.  There was an example of this against Stoke in the first half where he wont he ball in their half and ran towards goal, as he was doing this, I said to my missus "watch him mess this up" and he didn't let me down.  Also, he keeps doing what Wayne Rooney does for Man Utd when he plays up front - he will come deep to collect the ball. I would prefer him not to do that and to be more of a nuisance in the box.  Ive seen him on numerous occasions on the wing to collect a ball and then will pass it short to another player and then just hang about there.  Now, Ive also seen Bent do the same thing but as soon as he makes that pass, he makes that run towards the box to get into a goal scoring position.  I wish Gabby would have that same mentality to in the mix and poach a few more goals for us.  This is just my opinion and many of u may disagree with me, but hey, I guess we are all entitled to it.

BANG BANG *blows imaginary smoke from fingers*
He didn't let me down. Sounds like you wanted him to, just to prove how very clever you are. Gabby always gives his all and at times he terrifies the opposition with his pace and can be a great pressure relief outlet for us.

He does terrify opponents with his pace, but I know what Rick means. But much of the time, it's only really effective when we're counter attacking. There are situations when Gabby's pace is nullified - most obviously when we're playing further up the pitch, compressing the opposition into their own half and dominating possession. There were longish periods when that happened against Arsenal. He was getting frustrated because he doesn't have the instinctive ability to slip a defender like Bent does. He can roll a big man like Vidic occasionally, but that's about it, and you just know he'd rather be starting from a deeper position and running the channels at a defence that's backing off.

So it's horses for courses. Gabby is brilliant in certain situations - but I suspect that had Bent been on the field against Arsenal, given the possession we had in the areas we had it, we could have ended up winning that one.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TheSandman on December 29, 2011, 04:42:20 PM
Annoyingly, if you add 30m for the chumps league then we would not be far off being the model club from an accounting perspective.

That was Randy's plan. Unfortunately, for whatever reason (and we could have another thirty page thread debating those reasons) it did not come off and we are finding ourselves in this period of retrenchment.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on December 29, 2011, 04:43:18 PM
It is rumoured that Bent is on alot more that £80k per week.  More like £110k p/w plus bonuses.
I've never seen or read anything to suggest that this is even close. Where is it rumoured exactly?

Most reports when we signed him suggested he was getting around £70k per week.

Like I said, rumoured.  I hear them and take them with a pinch of salt but share them with others.  AVFC fans on twitter saying this.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Billy Walker on December 29, 2011, 04:43:30 PM
I'd swap Bent for Carroll.  Looking at one or two Liverpool forums it is rumoured that they would be willing to sell him, too.   If we managed that I would say we have got the better long-term deal.

I feel sorry for Darren Bent to be honest.  He joins Villa just as we begin to change our whole approach to building the side.  And now he might be off-loaded to dull-as-dishwater Liverpool, a club that could finish anywhere between sixth and eighth.  Is that his level or does his goal scoring prowess suggest he deserves more?

 

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dante Lavelli on December 29, 2011, 04:45:03 PM
I do not think it is fair on either player to compare Bent and Gabby.  Whilst notionally strikers they play completely different roles.  Bent is a classic goal hanger whilst Gabby is more of a link between midfield and attack whilst also helping defensively.

Personally i think Gabby is more important to us than Bent as modern football rarely allows you the luxury of playing "just" a goal hanger.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: dave.woodhall on December 29, 2011, 04:46:37 PM
All these clubs Bent's linked with. Are they signing him on a timeshare?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on December 29, 2011, 04:51:07 PM
The Gabby debate has been done to death on here.  He's a good player for us, but does have limitations.  He's not a 20-a-season man, but will hit double figures with enough games.  His pace is a great asset to us, but he lacks a top level footballing brain.

Is there really anything more that needs to be said?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on December 29, 2011, 04:52:24 PM
The Gabby debate has been done to death on here.  He's a good player for us, but does have limitations.  He's not a 20-a-season man, but will hit double figures with enough games.  His pace is a great asset to us, but he lacks a top level footballing brain.

Is there really anything more that needs to be said?

Nope!  I think we should move on now.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: stubbsyandy on December 29, 2011, 05:08:01 PM
I see Henry has been offered a deal for 2 months by Arsenal. He's a great signing to bring off the bench even if he isn't the player he once was. I'm surprised given our Irish contingent that we've not done the same with Robbie Keane, a player that has been linked to us forever. He needs a club to play for to stay sharp ahead of the Euros and he'd be a lot more effective than having Heskey or Fonz on the bench.

This is a good idea..AM take note and get on the blower
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Vanilla on December 29, 2011, 05:12:07 PM
I see Henry has been offered a deal for 2 months by Arsenal. He's a great signing to bring off the bench even if he isn't the player he once was. I'm surprised given our Irish contingent that we've not done the same with Robbie Keane, a player that has been linked to us forever. He needs a club to play for to stay sharp ahead of the Euros and he'd be a lot more effective than having Heskey or Fonz on the bench.

This is a good idea..AM take note and get on the blower

I can see the headlines now, 'Bargain Keane Signed as Replacement for Darren Bent'.

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on December 29, 2011, 05:22:59 PM
I'm not saying I believe or do not believe the Bent rumours, but what I will say is that I have absolutely zero confidence in this board to not take the money.

It is pretty sad to have arrived at this point, but I just do not trust them.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on December 29, 2011, 05:29:06 PM
Nor me at the moment Paulie, and I don't get the impression he and McLeish are in love either, unlike he and Houllier who he was the marque signing for. Considering O'Neills big signings are also basically all gone, selling Bent could be his way of making it his team, although we would be much poorer for it. Imagine - 25 million in for Bent, 8 million out on a 31 year old Zamora..... I can see it happening.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: mattjpa on December 29, 2011, 05:46:07 PM
Apparently we have owonkwo on trial? I know he's a Nigerian right back but not much else...
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Clampy on December 29, 2011, 05:52:12 PM
I'd like to think that the board would not be stupid enough to sell Bent so soon after selling Young and Downing. If they did, it may just make up the mind of those fans who thought very long and hard about renewing this season, not to mention the impact it would have on the pitch.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on December 29, 2011, 05:56:25 PM
I'd like to think that the board would not be stupid enough to sell Bent so soon after selling Young and Downing. If they did, it may just make up the mind of those fans who thought very long and hard about renewing this season, not to mention the impact it would have on the pitch.

That's my belief too. I understand why some don't trust the board, but there's no reason to sell Bent. The only thing would be if their hand was really forced and he handed in a transfer request. I don't see why he'd do that. We all know the background to the previous major sales, and there's nothing to suggest Bent despite what he's said in the press would do a Downing and betray us.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Tokyo Sexwhale on December 29, 2011, 06:01:58 PM
Apparently we have owonkwo on trial? I know he's a Nigerian right back but not much else...

Look's like it:

http://www.tribune.com.ng/index.php/sports/33503-okonkwo-on-trials-at-aston-villa
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on December 29, 2011, 06:02:33 PM
I'd like to think that the board would not be stupid enough to sell Bent so soon after selling Young and Downing. If they did, it may just make up the mind of those fans who thought very long and hard about renewing this season, not to mention the impact it would have on the pitch.

That's what I thought in the summer - no way would they sell Downing now Young is going.

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on December 29, 2011, 06:11:16 PM
I'd like to think that the board would not be stupid enough to sell Bent so soon after selling Young and Downing. If they did, it may just make up the mind of those fans who thought very long and hard about renewing this season, not to mention the impact it would have on the pitch.

That's what I thought in the summer - no way would they sell Downing now Young is going.



I think we all believed that Paulie and it was made worse that Downing at the end of the season had publicly stated how much he enjoyed being at the club, much as Bent is saying now I suppose. But clearly something changed, be it through someone representing Liverpool or the agent getting to the player. The whole atmosphere leading into pre-season with Downing went very cold. I'm not saying something similar might not happen with Bent in the summer, but I can't see it happening right now. It will really depend on what the club looks like then. It was all a little chaotic this past summer to say the least which didn't help matters at all.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Ads on December 29, 2011, 06:37:36 PM
I don't think we're selling Bent, but I would not be surprised if the board did, which is an odd contradiction.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TheStinger on December 29, 2011, 06:53:28 PM
In my opinion we need a striker, a CAM or at the very least a good CM and better LB.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Shrek on December 29, 2011, 07:03:11 PM
I'd swap Bent for Andy Carroll and Jon Jo Shelvy all day long, otherwise jog on Liverpoo.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithesShin on December 29, 2011, 07:08:03 PM
I can't see the logic in signing a striker we've spent most of this year taking the piss out of for being shit.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 29, 2011, 07:35:49 PM
he's yer typical longball forward is Carroll. You can imagine MON buying him let alone AM. Lerner and AM would have to be brave to sanction Bent's sale as it could turn nasty very quickly if we continued to struggle in the new year. I can't see them risking it.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Shrek on December 29, 2011, 07:43:46 PM
I can Greg, Randy is all about the money now.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Villanation on December 29, 2011, 07:45:17 PM
http://www.clickliverpool.com/sport/liverpool-fc/1215036-liverpool-fc-make-enquiry-for-aston-villa-striker-darren-bent.html
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: KevinGage on December 29, 2011, 07:48:23 PM
So what's that us down to 'only' £58million a year or so?

What is Delloit's target % of wages vs turnover?  50%?
That would mean we need a turnover of 116m whereas I think the last reported turnover was 84m.

So we just need to double our turnover and we'll be fine!

Thing is, what should a squad of 25 be paid?  If you take it as your 3 top boys are on £80k, the next level is 4 players on £60k, then the remainder of the first 11 4 on £50k.  You need to have a decent squad, so your top 3 reserves are on a par with the first team at £50k, with the rest of your usual bench averaging £35k.  After that, you'll be talking about cheap fioreigners and emerging kids at around £20k average for 7 players.

Does that sound reasonable for a non CL club who are trying to attain top 6 status?  Well, thats a total of £57,720,000 per year, with an average first team wage of £61k and squad average £44,400 per week.

So if we want to be that sort of side, and folow the 50% rule, then turnover should be £115,440,000, which is a 37% increase from where we are now.

If I'm honest I'm not sure what type of point I'm making here, other than these are probably the maths Randy & Co have been doing.

Or if we look at it the other way round, and wee what a £84m turnover can get us?  Again on the 50% basis we're looking at £42m, so if I use the same scale as above we'd be looking at a top earner of £58,212, with the first team and squad averages £44,387 and 332,308 respectively.  And that's firm mid table territory.   

You raise some good points John, but I'm kinda with Hartman_1982 on this one.

We couldn't have a whole host of reserves on circa 35/40k per week. 

The challenge for a club in our position -that is any club not receiving CL money/ being bankrollled by a Sheik-  is to get a level of performance from the overall squad that actually exceeds the expectations one might have based on wages alone.

The way to do this (if at all possible) is to have a hungry squad, made up of your top players on premium wages, young players delivering performances way beyond their pay packet and sourcing the likes of a Assou Ekotto, a Rodallega or a Diame early, so you at least get 2/3 years out of them before either paying them a wage more in keeping with your better players, or selling them at profit.  Easier said than done, I know.   

We know the alternative approach- throwing big wages at established (but pretty ordinary) players and regularly not playing 5/6 of them definitely does not work, and doesn't make for a competitive squad. It just leads to players getting comfortable not playing and pocketing wages for very little return, or players that need big settlements if/when we finally can ship them out.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SoccerHQ on December 29, 2011, 07:53:19 PM
Does anyone have any idea of how much we have reduced the wage bill per week, by?
Who are still the high earners ?  Heskey, Beye, Collins, Dunne, Petrov, Warnock & BENT?

OK - lets try and work this out starting from last summer when Milner went and excluding loans:-

Out
Milner - £60k
Shorey - £40k
NRC - £50k
Downing - £60k
A Young - £60k
Davies - £40k
Sidwell - £50k
Freidel - £50k
L Young - £50k
Have I forgotten anyone?
Total - £450k a week

In
Ireland - £60k (heard he acceopted Milner's wages)
Bent - £80k
Hutton - £40k
Given - £60k
N'Zogbia - £60k
Total - £240k

So I make it an almost £11m a year saving from where we were during our wages height under MON


Carew who I'd say would be on 50k a week.

Also remember the likes of Salifou, Osbourne and Pires were on 10k or above.

Don't forget we're also paying Jenas's wages for the rest of te season although you can counter that with letting Makoun going out on loan.

To me we've cut the wage bill enough and next summer, Beye, Heskey and Cuellar will be leaving so that will be another 140k a week saved. With probably an experience player or two leaving that will be another 10m a season saved.

To me that's enough we can't cut anymore otherwise I think we'll be relegated next season.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Steve kirk on December 29, 2011, 07:53:45 PM
I think if Bent was to leave in January we would be very close to relegation this season, although he has not been at his best recently he will be the key player in the vital home games against Swansea, Qpr, Bolton, Fulham and Sunderland, I am sure in those games and others he will get us vital goals to keep us in the division, it would be madness to sell when we are so vulnerable.     
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SoccerHQ on December 29, 2011, 08:00:00 PM
Does anyone have any idea of how much we have reduced the wage bill per week, by?
Who are still the high earners ?  Heskey, Beye, Collins, Dunne, Petrov, Warnock & BENT?

OK - lets try and work this out starting from last summer when Milner went and excluding loans:-

Out
Milner - £60k
Shorey - £40k
NRC - £50k
Downing - £60k
A Young - £60k
Davies - £40k
Sidwell - £50k
Freidel - £50k
L Young - £50k
Have I forgotten anyone?
Total - £450k a week

In
Ireland - £60k (heard he acceopted Milner's wages)
Bent - £80k
Hutton - £40k
Given - £60k
N'Zogbia - £60k
Total - £240k

So I make it an almost £11m a year saving from where we were during our wages height under MON

It is rumoured that Bent is on alot more that £80k per week.  More like £110k p/w plus bonuses.

The problem with exercises like this is that you miss all the players who have been given new & improved contracts. We've several who will have stepped up from youth team money to first team money over the last year (Bannan, Herd etc).

Maybe but they're only minimal wages increases, I highly doubt after 5 or so prem games Herd has gone from earning 5k a week to 30k a week do you?

5k to 10k or thereabouts is still less than half a million a year so it's certainly not hurting the club as much as Heskey bleeding us dry on 60k a week.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Shrek on December 29, 2011, 08:00:21 PM
Hopefully spurs get Tevez then we can have Defoe.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 29, 2011, 08:02:40 PM
we've got a smaller squad than DOL's time. By next summer with the departure of Petrov and co. it won't be fit for purpose. It barely is now. This isn't about trimming the fat off the squad - it's about an owner who can no longer afford to run a football club
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Villanation on December 29, 2011, 08:04:37 PM
Hopefully spurs get Tevez then we can have Defoe.

Tevez is a whatever and whoever job, however Defoe would be a good signing and if Bent moved on, which has to be said wouldn't be the end of the world, Defoe would be a better option than Carrol ( mentioned as a swap) which to me is akin to the lost city of Atlantis in term of myth when it comes to him being listed as a top striker
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Clampy on December 29, 2011, 08:07:06 PM
I'd swap Bent for Andy Carroll and Jon Jo Shelvy all day long, otherwise jog on Liverpoo.

Since when has Shelvy been the next big thing?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Steve kirk on December 29, 2011, 08:09:21 PM
Greg is spot on next season regarding the squad and club in general is a massive worry, as long as Bent stays post Jan we will be ok for this season but come the start of next season I dread to think about the state we will be in.   
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Vanilla on December 29, 2011, 08:11:26 PM
Hopefully spurs get Tevez then we can have Defoe.

Tevez is a whatever and whoever job, however Defoe would be a good signing and if Bent moved on, which has to be said wouldn't be the end of the world, Defoe would be a better option than Carrol ( mentioned as a swap) which to me is akin to the lost city of Atlantis in term of myth when it comes to him being listed as a top striker

Defoe might be worth considering. But taking into account our route one approach and Defoe's deficiency in the height department, his move might prove as pointless as our last two acquisitions from Spuds.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Villanation on December 29, 2011, 08:15:14 PM
Greg is spot on next season regarding the squad and club in general is a massive worry, as long as Bent stays post Jan we will be ok for this season but come the start of next season I dread to think about the state we will be in.

We have to buy in January, in other words now, to be ready for the turnaround in the summer, all we can then hope for if we do this is using this season to bed players in, and start to see how we are going to shape up before getting into the summer transfer window.

We need to spend min 20ML in the next few weeks and a further 30 in the summer to give us a decent side.

Problem is who will trust AM to waist, or not, that kind of money that the club needs to spend but probably RL won't have it again to spend if he does sanction this, this is the catch 22.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 29, 2011, 08:18:11 PM
tend to agree. Defoe is a goal poacher like Bent and they don't suit AM's game. No surprise Bent has gone completely to pot since AM came in and Gabby has gone the other way. Defoe would be a waste of money and Levy would screw every last penny out of a negotiating amateurs like our board
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SoccerHQ on December 29, 2011, 08:22:10 PM
Greg is spot on next season regarding the squad and club in general is a massive worry, as long as Bent stays post Jan we will be ok for this season but come the start of next season I dread to think about the state we will be in.   

Yep I agree with that.

Next season is going to be a big struggle for the club I fear unless things drastically change.

The club is just plodding along the minute like Newcastle were probably the season before they went down. Everton are similar to us but have a very good manager who constantly overachieves with what he has to work with, we don't.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: KevinGage on December 29, 2011, 08:22:11 PM
Defoe and Bent didn't work as a partnership at Tottingham, so I'm not sure why it would work now.

It would definitely be a case of one or t'other.  I wouldn't actually be against letting Bent go for the right price, providing we got a price far in excess of his worth and were able to spend the bulk of it on team strengthening.

But seeing as neither of those things look remotely likely, we should be focussing on finding a system that gets the best out of our most expensive asset.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Shrek on December 29, 2011, 08:33:25 PM
Defoe is better than Bent, he creates his own goals, he contributes to the team and is all round a better footballer.

It could only happen if Bent went.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: KevinGage on December 29, 2011, 08:38:32 PM
I'm not sure he contributes to the team more, Defoe is a pretty selfish player -will always go for a shot at goal even if the odds are against it and a team mate is in a better position.

He's a better finisher than Bent and looks like a more natural footballer, but Bent has better movement and anticipation as to where the ball will drop in the box.  He might miss a few, but it's a skill to find that space in the first place.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Clampy on December 29, 2011, 08:43:24 PM
I think we need to forget about signing Defoe, even if Bent was sold. For one, Redknapp has signed him twice and i don't think he'd let him go and secondly, he likes to play his football down south. I'm not sure he'd settle up here.

We've already got a very good goalscorer, who's already proved what an asset he can be to us. Selling him would just strengthen whoever we sold him to and we've done enough of that already.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 29, 2011, 08:43:59 PM
Defoe and Bent didn't work as a partnership at Tottingham, so I'm not sure why it would work now.

It would definitely be a case of one or t'other.  I wouldn't actually be against letting Bent go for the right price, providing we got a price far in excess of his worth and were able to spend the bulk of it on team strengthening.

But seeing as neither of those things look remotely likely, we should be focussing on finding a system that gets the best out of our most expensive asset.


we all saw the system that Bent thrived in last season and thats not gonna happen. We really are in a mess because we spent a hell of a lot of money buying players to suit the previous managers idea's only to find ourselves retrogressing to what we have now. I can only imagine Bent will eventually be sold unless Lerner does another about turn, sacks the manager, and decides he wants to play football again.. And then we'll have the likes of our back 4 to deal with again...total and utter mess really.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: VancouverLion on December 29, 2011, 08:56:47 PM
I cannot believe that some people are not that arsed if we let Bent go!!  We've been crying out for a 20 goal a season striker for decades, now we have one FFS!!!

We're fast becoming a laughing stock, unbelievable!
If we let Bent go now, we may aswell pack it in, what's the point?!

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 29, 2011, 09:13:37 PM
I cannot believe that some people are not that arsed if we let Bent go!!  We've been crying out for a 20 goal a season striker for decades, now we have one FFS!!!

We're fast becoming a laughing stock, unbelievable!
If we let Bent go now, we may aswell pack it in, what's the point?!




I don't think anyone wants to see him go, but the trouble is if you're not going to play to his strengths then he's no longer a 20 goal a season striker. we played to his strengths last season and the defence started shipping goals at a staggering rate. Unfortunately instead of getting new defenders in and solving the problem, we kept the hoofers and brought in a manager who likes a "cough"  no nonsence approach, probably for cost reasons. So regrettably i think its more likely we'll get in a forward who suits that stylerather than devalue Bent even more playing him in a set-up that doesn't suit him.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ROBBO on December 29, 2011, 09:15:41 PM
Houllier was trying to get us playing decent attractive football, he had the contacts to make things exciting next season, Mcleish will bore the pants of us and eventually get us relegated. Brilliant bit of business by the Villa board.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: VancouverLion on December 29, 2011, 09:29:07 PM
But we can't sell our best players just becuase our manager is clueless, can we?...
I just cannot get my head around how much of a shambles we've become, it's not right!
Next we'll be bringing in Jason Roberts on loan!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 29, 2011, 09:35:26 PM
But we can't sell our best players just becuase our manager is clueless, can we?...
I just cannot get my head around how much of a shambles we've become, it's not right!
Next we'll be bringing in Jason Roberts on loan!


to be fair to the guy, you've got a team weaker by young and downing from last season and no money to replace the defence even if he wanted to, so playing a game that would suit bent would probably be pretty suicidal all told
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: hawkeye on December 29, 2011, 09:38:41 PM
Bent is a very one dimensional and limited footballer and contributes very little. The issue is when Bent misses its a bigger problem because his only attribute is scoring. He should look at Andy Cole who was very similar but improved the rest of his game. He worked on his upper body strength and became more effective, he was however playing with great players.

I cant see him staying long term.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 29, 2011, 09:49:05 PM
Bent is a very one dimensional and limited footballer and contributes very little. The issue is when Bent misses its a bigger problem because his only attribute is scoring. He should look at Andy Cole who was very similar but improved the rest of his game. He worked on his upper body strength and became more effective, he was however playing with great players.

I cant see him staying long term.


while i agree he's one dimensional and limited i'd rather say thats the point of him. Your original lazy bastard goal hanging, shit for 89 minutes and gets a hattrick striker. As i said when he signed he can be utter bobbins as long as he keeps scoring.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Shrek on December 29, 2011, 09:49:21 PM
We've been crying out for a 20 goal a season striker yes, but when was the last 20 goal a season striker that was as shit a footballer as Bent? He is shit in the air, shit on the ball, and contributes nothing else to the team.

I would rather keep him yes, but id sell for a profit, if it benefited Villa in the long term.

It's no coincidence that spurs sold him and improved. He is a luxury, a team being managed by someone like AM can't afford.

Randy seriously needs to look in the mirror.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: VancouverLion on December 29, 2011, 09:50:23 PM
But we can't sell our best players just becuase our manager is clueless, can we?...
I just cannot get my head around how much of a shambles we've become, it's not right!
Next we'll be bringing in Jason Roberts on loan!


to be fair to the guy, you've got a team weaker by young and downing from last season and no money to replace the defence even if he wanted to, so playing a game that would suit bent would probably be pretty suicidal all told

But last week against Arsenal we did play a game to suit Bent & if we could match that level of performance every week, Bent would get us the goals & into europe.
We've proved we can play well albeit one game, Stoke was ok, but the signs are we could be getting there.
Selling him imo would be a massive mistake, as massive a mistake as the board made in the summer.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Shrek on December 29, 2011, 09:58:14 PM
But we can't sell our best players just becuase our manager is clueless, can we?...
I just cannot get my head around how much of a shambles we've become, it's not right!
Next we'll be bringing in Jason Roberts on loan!


to be fair to the guy, you've got a team weaker by young and downing from last season and no money to replace the defence even if he wanted to, so playing a game that would suit bent would probably be pretty suicidal all told

But last week against Arsenal we did play a game to suit Bent & if we could match that level of performance every week, Bent would get us the goals & into europe.
We've proved we can play well albeit one game, Stoke was ok, but the signs are we could be getting there.
Selling him imo would be a massive mistake, as massive a mistake as the board made in the summer.

The problem is, we played that well because we replaced an anonymous Bent with a very creative player in Ireland then Bannan.

Take that creative hard working player out and replace with Bent we are back to square one in theory.

What we need to do is recreate our performance first half at Bolton playing 442.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: glasses on December 29, 2011, 10:03:27 PM
Bent is a very one dimensional and limited footballer and contributes very little. The issue is when Bent misses its a bigger problem because his only attribute is scoring. He should look at Andy Cole who was very similar but improved the rest of his game. He worked on his upper body strength and became more effective, he was however playing with great players.

I cant see him staying long term.


while i agree he's one dimensional and limited i'd rather say thats the point of him. Your original lazy bastard goal hanging, shit for 89 minutes and gets a hattrick striker. As i said when he signed he can be utter bobbins as long as he keeps scoring.
He isn't scoring enough though. He has played 14 league games this season, and scored 5 goals. Gabby has managed the same in 13 games. Gabby has been more important for us this season all round, has 7 assists and to be honest, I think we have looked better in the last two games without Bent in the team and Gabs up front.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 29, 2011, 10:14:26 PM
Bent is a very one dimensional and limited footballer and contributes very little. The issue is when Bent misses its a bigger problem because his only attribute is scoring. He should look at Andy Cole who was very similar but improved the rest of his game. He worked on his upper body strength and became more effective, he was however playing with great players.

I cant see him staying long term.


while i agree he's one dimensional and limited i'd rather say thats the point of him. Your original lazy bastard goal hanging, shit for 89 minutes and gets a hattrick striker. As i said when he signed he can be utter bobbins as long as he keeps scoring.
He isn't scoring enough though. He has played 14 league games this season, and scored 5 goals. Gabby has managed the same in 13 games. Gabby has been more important for us this season all round, has 7 assists and to be honest, I think we have looked better in the last two games without Bent in the team and Gabs up front.


He's not scoring because we don't play to his strengths and its pointless comparing Gabby to Bent. Bent will always come a poor 2nd to gabby in effort, assists and all round influence on a game. Even when Bent was keeping us up last season he was never a dominant figure apart from the goals. The big difference is bent was capable of keeping us up by his goals, or in better circumstances getting us into Europe or the CL. Gabby will never be that player
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Clampy on December 29, 2011, 11:10:48 PM
Bent is a very one dimensional and limited footballer and contributes very little. The issue is when Bent misses its a bigger problem because his only attribute is scoring. He should look at Andy Cole who was very similar but improved the rest of his game. He worked on his upper body strength and became more effective, he was however playing with great players.

I cant see him staying long term.


while i agree he's one dimensional and limited i'd rather say thats the point of him. Your original lazy bastard goal hanging, shit for 89 minutes and gets a hattrick striker. As i said when he signed he can be utter bobbins as long as he keeps scoring.
He isn't scoring enough though. He has played 14 league games this season, and scored 5 goals.

But last season, he scored something like 11 in 16.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithesShin on December 29, 2011, 11:14:44 PM
I'm pretty sure it was 9 last season Clampy. I'm sure he's 14 in 30 in the league for us so far.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on December 29, 2011, 11:29:00 PM
He's not scoring because we never give him the ball.

Talking of not scoring, as a team we have a problem with that. Selling a reliable finisher strikes me as approaching the problem from the wrong end.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: glasses on December 29, 2011, 11:37:57 PM
Bent is a very one dimensional and limited footballer and contributes very little. The issue is when Bent misses its a bigger problem because his only attribute is scoring. He should look at Andy Cole who was very similar but improved the rest of his game. He worked on his upper body strength and became more effective, he was however playing with great players.

I cant see him staying long term.


while i agree he's one dimensional and limited i'd rather say thats the point of him. Your original lazy bastard goal hanging, shit for 89 minutes and gets a hattrick striker. As i said when he signed he can be utter bobbins as long as he keeps scoring.
He isn't scoring enough though. He has played 14 league games this season, and scored 5 goals.

But last season, he scored something like 11 in 16.
But this season, he isn't scoring enough. I'm in agreement that the issue is service. We don't create anywhere near enough chances.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on December 29, 2011, 11:43:19 PM
He is not as bad an all round player as some make out either, in fairness we were pleasantly surprised when he first came at his touch etc, but he has struggled this season in a long ball team up front for large periods alone with very little support from the midfield. His record is still brilliant for us, and with confidence will remain easily 1 in 2 for us while here. Gabby, and no other striker for what we would replace him with, is going to get close to that.

They showed a snapshot of his workrate in the Liverpool game too, how much running he did etc, and it was phenomenal, just totally useless. He works hard, but people have very pre-set views on him. He is a difference player, and 9 in 14 saved us last season.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: glasses on December 29, 2011, 11:47:07 PM
He's not scoring because we never give him the ball.

Talking of not scoring, as a team we have a problem with that. Selling a reliable finisher strikes me as approaching the problem from the wrong end.
In my point made to Greg, I feel we have looked better with Gabby as the lone striker and a creative presence behind him. The last two games we have looked like a team, instead of trying to accommodate Bent. Personally, if we could sell Bent, and improve the supply line with the proceeds (along with a cheap decent striker) Id be happy enough.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Matt C on December 29, 2011, 11:47:47 PM
Only we could convince ourselves that Darren Bent isn't any good. Don't tell me, we don't miss Ashley either, he was rubbish too.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: glasses on December 29, 2011, 11:50:27 PM
We do miss Ashley, because he was a big part of why Bent scored so many last season.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on December 30, 2011, 12:01:35 AM
We will not be better off if Bent leaves, he is a top class Premier League striker. The bottom line is we should be finding a way to best utilise him, he's a brilliant asset.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on December 30, 2011, 12:02:11 AM
Correct.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Pete3206 on December 30, 2011, 12:12:26 AM
He's not scoring because we never give him the ball.

Talking of not scoring, as a team we have a problem with that. Selling a reliable finisher strikes me as approaching the problem from the wrong end.
In my point made to Greg, I feel we have looked better with Gabby as the lone striker and a creative presence behind him. The last two games we have looked like a team, instead of trying to accommodate Bent. Personally, if we could sell Bent, and improve the supply line with the proceeds (along with a cheap decent striker) Id be happy enough.

How many decent strikers are cheap? We should be trying to accommodate Bent. If we were more successful at doing that, he'd get more goals. Goals win games. At the very worst, you can avoid defeat. Selling Bent and replacing him with cart horses is a one way trip to the bottom 3. Sadly, I can see that coming anyway.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ROBBO on December 30, 2011, 07:19:22 AM
Perhaps we could get AY back on loan, he's only a bit player at United.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Ryu on December 30, 2011, 09:13:22 AM
Bent is a top goal poacher who should be in the team when fit and I definitely don't think we should even consider selling him.

However I do see where people who might think it's a good idea are coming from. He hasn't been very good for most of this season, like most of the team. I understand he needs service but I don't think he should be above criticism to such a point the fans start blaming the other players and manager for his poor form. I accept we haven't created enough chances as a team this season but IMO Bent should have more than 5 goals and if he was playing like he was last season for us he would have. 
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Ian. on December 30, 2011, 09:24:33 AM
Are people really convinced selling Bent is our way forward? Shouldn't we be trying to play to our strengths and making proper use of the players we have.
I could imagine the outrage now if God forbid AM suggests we would be better off selling Bent.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Chris Smith on December 30, 2011, 09:35:52 AM
We do miss Ashley, because he was a big part of why Bent scored so many last season.

Exactly, his supply lines disappeared when we sold Young and Downing. Until very recently their replacements have struggled for form so we haven't been creating chances for him.

If Albrighton and N'Zogbia carry on as in recent games he'll soon be back amongst the goals.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Risso on December 30, 2011, 09:37:45 AM
We do miss Ashley, because he was a big part of why Bent scored so many last season.

Exactly, his supply lines disappeared when we sold Young and Downing. Until very recently their replacements have struggled for form sobwe haven't been creating chances for him.

If Albrighton and N'Zogbia carry on as in recent genes he'll soon be back amongst the goals.

What chances has N'Zogbia created in recent games?  All he really seems to have done is go past a couple of players before blasting it into row Z.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Ryu on December 30, 2011, 09:44:06 AM
Zog created albrighton's goal against Bolton didn't he?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rigadon on December 30, 2011, 10:02:50 AM
WHere is all this Bent to Liverpool stuff really coming from anyway?  Said before that I wouldn't shed a tear if Bent went, he's not a player you can really warm to, but as AM has said recently, it would send the wrong message. 
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on December 30, 2011, 10:05:03 AM
We do miss Ashley, because he was a big part of why Bent scored so many last season.

Exactly, his supply lines disappeared when we sold Young and Downing. Until very recently their replacements have struggled for form so we haven't been creating chances for him.

If Albrighton and N'Zogbia carry on as in recent games he'll soon be back amongst the goals.

Totally agree.

I've just read through the last few pages and it seems that "Bent is rubbish apart from scoring" seems to be the new myth on here to replace "Petrov tires", "NRC can't pass" and "We lost because Carlos was at right back."  His all round game is competent for PL level, but for some unless he's like Henry they'll exagerate any weakness until they convince themselves, and others, it's a major flaw.

And for those who are claiming we only played well against Arsenal as Gabby was upfront, and Bent wouldn't have give us what he did, I'd point you to Bolton away.  The difference has not been Gabby, but the wingers finding form.  Our issue all season has been one of creativity and what we have now is the wide players doing well combined with Clark in midfield, who sits a bit deeper and takes the ball of the CBs, thereby giving a passing option and limiting the punts upfield.  Put Darren Bent back into that side and he'll be back to the player that scored 9 in 14 last season for us.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on December 30, 2011, 10:05:35 AM
Those who wouldnt be too bothered if we sold Bent - where do they think our goals are going to come from?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rigadon on December 30, 2011, 10:07:46 AM
Paulie, we'd have to replace him with somebody.  Carrol maybe?  Bent is about as good an out and out goal scorer we're likely to get so we'd miss him in the squad.  I suppose I'm just saying I would be all that bothered.  Maybe I'm just used to it? 
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on December 30, 2011, 10:08:25 AM
I don't get the antipathy towards Bent, he is a proven quality Premier league striker who will score goals if you give him chances. There are no teams who don't need that and very few have it, we are very lucky.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Shrek on December 30, 2011, 10:33:37 AM
My problem with Bent is, he contributes nothing apart from tap ins, if he would occasionally drop in deep, pick up the ball and at least try to create a goal for himself I would relate to him alot more personally.

He literally just does tap ins which creates a lot of pressure on the rest of the team.
It's no coincidence we've played better without him, because when he is playing we are effectively playing with 10 men until he hopefully puts a chance away.

I mentioned Defoe earlier, they are similar but Dedoe scores goals from everywhere, outside the box, inside the box and where he's picked up the ball, run past a player a scored. Has Bent ever created a goal for himself ever?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JUAN PABLO on December 30, 2011, 10:34:50 AM
Sell Bent ?. FFS        only score scores    ???   FFS
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Shrek on December 30, 2011, 10:47:06 AM
Sell Bent ?. FFS        only score scores    ???   FFS

He's not scoring, he isn't contributing anything. Without Gabby this season we would be bottom.

For such a good goal scorer, there is a reason he has never made it at a top 6 club.

Yes we should keep him. But only if Alex Mcleish is going to change the way he plays, otherwise we may aswell cash in and get a hoof ball specialist.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on December 30, 2011, 10:50:43 AM
Yes we should keep him. But only if Alex Mcleish is going to change the way he plays

Liverpool aside, have you not seen a change in our play over the last few games?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulTheVillan on December 30, 2011, 10:51:55 AM
I don't think we should sell Bent. I think we should try & attack more (Bolton, Arsenal) & maybe get the best out of him.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: old man villa fan on December 30, 2011, 10:52:33 AM
I'm amazed at people trying to talk a quality goal scorer out of the club.  Is it because these people think he might be on his way because we are now a 'selling' club (according to some) and so want to get in first by saying he is rubbish anyway.

Some are saying on the one hand that the only thing he does is score goals and the on the other, we are not creating chances.  It seems pretty simple to me, change your style and create those chances.  We created those chances for him last season but I hear some of you say "but we have lost Young and Downing" which is true but if you look where on the pitch those chances were created from, it was not generally from a player going down the wing and crossing the ball, many were from the ball being slid through to him on the ground from deeper positions.  Albrighton and N'Zogbia are not doing this and the other midfield players are playing too deep to do it.

If I was selecting the team I would play Bent and Gabby up front, play 3 across the middle (with only one of the wide players), with one behind them.  The trouble is we are so used to (and so are the opposition) playing 4-4-2 with 2 wide players that we seem to have lost how to play the ball around in the middle of the park.

Back to Bent, if we are not creating chances for him, surely it would be the same if we brought somebody else in.  The answer has to be, play in a way that creates more chances.  I am not sure what Bent's strike rate in the PL is, 1 in 3?  Considering he has taken penalties in the past, this would probably make it nearer 1 in 4 from open play.  Are we currently creating this many chances for him alone - no, we are actually struggling to create this many chances in total.

Bent is not the best at holding the ball up but he is good at laying the ball off first time when it is played to him, providing he has players either along side him or supporting closely from behind.  Do we do this, no we do not.

So we have a quality goal scorer and a player that can lay the ball off well, two attributes you need in a top PL striker but we are not creating enough chances for him or playing the ball into him in the best way.  It is no wonder we are not getting his career strike rate out of him this season.  It would seem that we would prefer to have a Heskey that holds the ball up well (when he is not falling down!) and brings others into play but at a snails pace by which time the opposition defence has got itself set.  It is little wonder somebody like Ireland is struggling to fit in (attitude excluded).
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulTheVillan on December 30, 2011, 10:54:05 AM
Does anyone have any idea of how much we have reduced the wage bill per week, by?
Who are still the high earners ?  Heskey, Beye, Collins, Dunne, Petrov, Warnock & BENT?

OK - lets try and work this out starting from last summer when Milner went and excluding loans:-

Out
Milner - £60k
Shorey - £40k
NRC - £50k
Downing - £60k
A Young - £60k
Davies - £40k
Sidwell - £50k
Freidel - £50k
L Young - £50k
Have I forgotten anyone?
Total - £450k a week

In
Ireland - £60k (heard he acceopted Milner's wages)
Bent - £80k
Hutton - £40k
Given - £60k
N'Zogbia - £60k
Total - £240k

So I make it an almost £11m a year saving from where we were during our wages height under MON

Pires.

;D
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Ian. on December 30, 2011, 10:54:39 AM
Sell Bent ?. FFS        only score scores    ???   FFS

He's not scoring, he isn't contributing anything. Without Gabby this season we would be bottom.

For such a good goal scorer, there is a reason he has never made it at a top 6 club.

Yes we should keep him. But only if Alex Mcleish is going to change the way he plays, otherwise we may aswell cash in and get a hoof ball specialist.
He can't score if he is not playing or his service has dried up. We have tried adapting so if continue to do so and the service comes he will be notching regularly again.
We are not a top 6 team anymore and Bent is as good as we are going to get at the moment. I'm happy we have him and he could be the very reason we have a good second half to this season.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Risso on December 30, 2011, 10:55:41 AM
Those who wouldnt be too bothered if we sold Bent - where do they think our goals are going to come from?

Exactly.  It's not like the cash would be reinvested in anybody as good is it?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulTheVillan on December 30, 2011, 10:57:02 AM
Those who wouldnt be too bothered if we sold Bent - where do they think our goals are going to come from?

Exactly.  It's not like the cash would be reinvested in anybody as good is it?
Carlton Cole.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Nastylee on December 30, 2011, 10:57:19 AM
I really do detest the modern day football fan. Idiotic fools!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: tarzansbrother on December 30, 2011, 10:58:19 AM
Sorry to ask but will we get money from the the Cahill to Chelsea move? £2m increase so £1m to villa if they got a 50% sell on. May allow funds to agree a loan deal of decent quality.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JUAN PABLO on December 30, 2011, 11:06:43 AM
MON still calling Henry , Terry  ;)
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dave on December 30, 2011, 11:09:46 AM
Sorry to ask but will we get money from the the Cahill to Chelsea move? £2m increase so £1m to villa if they got a 50% sell on. May allow funds to agree a loan deal of decent quality.
Apparently we have 15% of anything over the £5m they originally paid.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Risso on December 30, 2011, 11:12:00 AM
Sorry to ask but will we get money from the the Cahill to Chelsea move? £2m increase so £1m to villa if they got a 50% sell on. May allow funds to agree a loan deal of decent quality.
Apparently we have 15% of anything over the £5m they originally paid.

Won't be much if anything then, as he's in the last year of his contract isn't he?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dave on December 30, 2011, 11:12:51 AM
Nope, not much at all.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on December 30, 2011, 11:15:13 AM
I heard £7m mentioned this morning, so that's £300,000 to us, which amounts to feck all in the modern game!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on December 30, 2011, 11:20:13 AM
I just find it hard to believe Chelsea think he's good enough for a title chasing team.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Karl Bridges on December 30, 2011, 11:23:12 AM
Sorry to ask but will we get money from the the Cahill to Chelsea move? £2m increase so £1m to villa if they got a 50% sell on. May allow funds to agree a loan deal of decent quality.

Enough to pay Heskey for 5 weeks.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 30, 2011, 11:36:56 AM
7m for Cahill is an absolute steal. With quality players around him he'll go on and probably replace Terry as England captain.

Meanwhile in downtown Amangsett the early morning peace is shattered by the sound of "DOH!" coming from one of the local mansions
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JUAN PABLO on December 30, 2011, 11:40:46 AM
I heard £7m mentioned this morning, so that's £300,000 to us, which amounts to feck all in the modern game!

6 weeks wages for Beye at least  ;(
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Clampy on December 30, 2011, 11:42:21 AM
7m for Cahill is an absolute steal. With quality players around him he'll go on and probably replace Terry as England captain.

Meanwhile in dowtown Amangsett the early morning peace is shattered by the sound of "DOH!" coming from one of the local mansions

If he was that good, Bolton would have asked for more than that.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Shrek on December 30, 2011, 11:43:17 AM
Yes we should keep him. But only if Alex Mcleish is going to change the way he plays

Liverpool aside, have you not seen a change in our play over the last few games?

That's my point.. We have played better because we have replaced Bent with a creative player.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 30, 2011, 11:44:25 AM
he's out of contract. Bolton aren't gonna risk getting nowt for him.- they can't afford to
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Shrek on December 30, 2011, 11:45:19 AM
Those who wouldnt be too bothered if we sold Bent - where do they think our goals are going to come from?

Exactly.  It's not like the cash would be reinvested in anybody as good is it?


This is the most depressing thing.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on December 30, 2011, 11:45:19 AM
Yes we should keep him. But only if Alex Mcleish is going to change the way he plays

Liverpool aside, have you not seen a change in our play over the last few games?

That's my point.. We have played better because we have replaced Bent with a creative player.

Well, against Arsenal we replaced him with Gabby, who was below par.  I've stated my views as to why we've picked up a bit of form, but fair enough if you don't agree.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Clampy on December 30, 2011, 11:49:17 AM
he's out of contract. Bolton aren't gonna risk getting nowt for him.- they can't afford to

It makes you wonder why they did'nt sell him sooner. I personally think it's because clubs were not convinced. £7m is not much of a risk for Chelsea at the end of the day.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 30, 2011, 11:54:27 AM
he's out of contract. Bolton aren't gonna risk getting nowt for him.- they can't afford to

It makes you wonder why they did'nt sell him sooner. I personally think it's because clubs were not convinced. £7m is not much of a risk for Chelsea at the end of the day.

mebbe. all told bolton haven't done too badly out of it - got their money and a bit on top. If he'd signed a new contract for them it would have been a different story on the money front i guess. Certainly the general consensus is he's been tapped up and has been going to chelsea since the start of the season so i'm not surprised no-one else came in for him unless it was Citeh or Manu
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JUAN PABLO on December 30, 2011, 11:56:47 AM
AMC just been on radio again   . I have to sell If I want to buy ...
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on December 30, 2011, 11:59:52 AM
AMC just been on radio again   . I have to sell If I want to buy ...

Those acceptable to go:-
Heskey.
Collins or Cuellar, but not both.
Beye.
Ireland.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Ryu on December 30, 2011, 12:00:36 PM
Clampy I think they would have sold him sooner if clubs had met their asking price, but when push came to shove arsenal and man utd decided they were better of shopping elsewhere if they were going to spend big money on a centre half.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rigadon on December 30, 2011, 12:01:33 PM
AMC just been on radio again   . I have to sell If I want to buy ...

Those acceptable to go:-
Heskey.
Collins or Cuellar, but not both.
Beye.
Ireland.


Would've said Ireland up until the Arsenal game.  Get his head right (yes, yes I know) and he's the spark we lack. 

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: teamvillage on December 30, 2011, 12:02:23 PM
AMC just been on radio again   . I have to sell If I want to buy ...

Rather he said that than "I've got a stinking great £30m war chest". Other clubs will price players accordingly. Whether it's true or not is the key question!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 30, 2011, 12:03:17 PM
AMC just been on radio again   . I have to sell If I want to buy ...


well if he sells Bent to do it then he's just been set-up for a fall by Lerner because he'll get the blame if a motley crew of duffers arrive
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on December 30, 2011, 12:06:06 PM
AMC just been on radio again   . I have to sell If I want to buy ...

Rather he said that than "I've got a stinking great £30m war chest". Other clubs will price players accordingly. Whether it's true or not is the key question!

I still think that's all wages related and not transfer fee.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Clampy on December 30, 2011, 12:06:19 PM
Clampy I think they would have sold him sooner if clubs had met their asking price

That's my point. The likes are Arsenal and Man Utd were maybe not convinced that he was good enough for the kind of money Bolton wanted.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JUAN PABLO on December 30, 2011, 12:09:31 PM
AMC just been on radio again   . I have to sell If I want to buy ...

Those acceptable to go:-
Heskey.
Collins or Cuellar, but not both.
Beye.
Ireland.


Would've said Ireland up until the Arsenal game.  Get his head right (yes, yes I know) and he's the spark we lack. 



I agree , It would be stupid to get rid of Ireland for hardly any money now, whatever his wages are , when you have the like of Beye still here .

Beye isnt ever going to come good but Ireland has shown later hes prepared to have a go .

Get the money for Collins and keep cuellar I reckon.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Ryu on December 30, 2011, 12:09:48 PM
Yeah that's my take on it as well. So now they're probably selling him for a little below what he's worth because they tried to get a little more. They should have took what they could in the summer and signed a couple of decent mid table sort of players.

Anyway, is their actually a single, creditable, Villa transfer rumour?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Ads on December 30, 2011, 12:11:13 PM
That’s different from what he said the other day, which was essentially “if I’m to bring one in, then the wage bill must be balanced”.

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 30, 2011, 12:12:19 PM
Clampy I think they would have sold him sooner if clubs had met their asking price

That's my point. The likes are Arsenal and Man Utd were maybe not convinced that he was good enough for the kind of money Bolton wanted.


end of the day there's only about 5 clubs that could have afforded him. even the 7m now probably  rules out the rest. A year ago chelsea didn't need a centre half, they do now
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 30, 2011, 12:16:50 PM
That’s different from what he said the other day, which was essentially “if I’m to bring one in, then the wage bill must be balanced”.




the wage bill thing is just a red herring. its all about lerner making a profit on the good signings to pay for the losses of the rubbish signings. If you were trying to just lower the wage bill you'd obviously just get rid of the shite even if it was at a major loss. We've still got shite while the good players have been flogged.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JUAN PABLO on December 30, 2011, 12:17:25 PM
Clampy I think they would have sold him sooner if clubs had met their asking price

That's my point. The likes are Arsenal and Man Utd were maybe not convinced that he was good enough for the kind of money Bolton wanted.


end of the day there's only about 5 clubs that could have afforded him. even the 7m now probably  rules out the rest. A year ago chelsea didn't need a centre half, they do now

they bought that brazillian 26 million one
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Ads on December 30, 2011, 12:18:51 PM
That’s different from what he said the other day, which was essentially “if I’m to bring one in, then the wage bill must be balanced”.




the wage bill thing is just a red herring. its all about lerner making a profit on the good signings to pay for the losses of the rubbish signings. If you were trying to just lower the wage bill you'd obviously just get rid of the shite even if it was at a major loss. We've still got shite while the good players have been flogged.

Well, surely that’s because it’s very easy to sell an Ashley Young, but very difficult to find somebody to buy players like Beye or Heskey, who are over 30 and on over 50,000 per week?

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 30, 2011, 12:22:35 PM
That’s different from what he said the other day, which was essentially “if I’m to bring one in, then the wage bill must be balanced”.




the wage bill thing is just a red herring. its all about lerner making a profit on the good signings to pay for the losses of the rubbish signings. If you were trying to just lower the wage bill you'd obviously just get rid of the shite even if it was at a major loss. We've still got shite while the good players have been flogged.

Well, surely that’s because it’s very easy to sell an Ashley Young, but very difficult to find somebody to buy players like Beye or Heskey, who are over 30 and on over 50,000 per week?




you'd just pay 'em off in that case. What is the point of us having beye in the squad? he's never going to play. We could have sold him to a championship club and offered to pay half his wages for the season. Still would have cost us less than currently
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JUAN PABLO on December 30, 2011, 12:22:44 PM
That’s different from what he said the other day, which was essentially “if I’m to bring one in, then the wage bill must be balanced”.




the wage bill thing is just a red herring. its all about lerner making a profit on the good signings to pay for the losses of the rubbish signings. If you were trying to just lower the wage bill you'd obviously just get rid of the shite even if it was at a major loss. We've still got shite while the good players have been flogged.

Well, surely that’s because it’s very easy to sell an Ashley Young, but very difficult to find somebody to buy players like Beye or Heskey, who are over 30 and on over 50,000 per week?



yes and Young wants to go ( cant blame him ) and those two cant believe how easy and lucky they are .
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: dave.woodhall on December 30, 2011, 12:23:37 PM

you'd just pay 'em off in that case. What is the point of us having beye in the squad? he's never going to play. We could have sold him to a championship club and offered to pay half his wages for the season. Still would have cost us less than currently

Do you really not think we've tried to do that?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 30, 2011, 12:26:09 PM

you'd just pay 'em off in that case. What is the point of us having beye in the squad? he's never going to play. We could have sold him to a championship club and offered to pay half his wages for the season. Still would have cost us less than currently

Do you really not think we've tried to do that?


Not really. I think the wage bill is a smokescreen and it suits the club to point out the likes of beye as a reason why they can't spend
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: dave.woodhall on December 30, 2011, 12:29:31 PM

you'd just pay 'em off in that case. What is the point of us having beye in the squad? he's never going to play. We could have sold him to a championship club and offered to pay half his wages for the season. Still would have cost us less than currently

Do you really not think we've tried to do that?


Not really. I think the wage bill is a smokescreen and it suits the club to point out the likes of beye as a reason why they can't spend

Yes, of course. They're happy to keep Beye on the wagebill just so they don't have to spend his wages on someone else. Presumably on orders from the President Emeritus's office
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 30, 2011, 12:32:21 PM

you'd just pay 'em off in that case. What is the point of us having beye in the squad? he's never going to play. We could have sold him to a championship club and offered to pay half his wages for the season. Still would have cost us less than currently

Do you really not think we've tried to do that?


Not really. I think the wage bill is a smokescreen and it suits the club to point out the likes of beye as a reason why they can't spend

Yes, of course. They're happy to keep Beye on the wagebill just so they don't have to spend his wages on someone else. Presumably on orders from the President Emeritus's office


look dave, you've got a player who's not worth a sausage and who isn't going to play. What other reason is there for keeping him? Just pay up his contract and let him leave. It won't cost us a penny more than having him in the reserves till May.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on December 30, 2011, 12:34:06 PM
That’s different from what he said the other day, which was essentially “if I’m to bring one in, then the wage bill must be balanced”.




the wage bill thing is just a red herring. its all about lerner making a profit on the good signings to pay for the losses of the rubbish signings. If you were trying to just lower the wage bill you'd obviously just get rid of the shite even if it was at a major loss. We've still got shite while the good players have been flogged.

Well, surely that’s because it’s very easy to sell an Ashley Young, but very difficult to find somebody to buy players like Beye or Heskey, who are over 30 and on over 50,000 per week?




you'd just pay 'em off in that case. What is the point of us having beye in the squad? he's never going to play. We could have sold him to a championship club and offered to pay half his wages for the season. Still would have cost us less than currently

In order to do that you'd still have to find a Championship club willing to pay him £20k a week.  It's nowhere nearly as easy as you make out to get players out of a club who want to stay.

And you do realise that 'paying up his contract' doesn't actually save us any money to spend elsewhere, don't you?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: dave.woodhall on December 30, 2011, 12:36:17 PM

look dave, you've got a player who's not worth a sausage and who isn't going to play. What other reason is there for keeping him? Just pay up his contract and let him leave. It won't cost us a penny more than having him in the reserves till May.

Because - and I know this might be hard to understand - there might come a time when he's needed.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 30, 2011, 12:38:52 PM
That’s different from what he said the other day, which was essentially “if I’m to bring one in, then the wage bill must be balanced”.




the wage bill thing is just a red herring. its all about lerner making a profit on the good signings to pay for the losses of the rubbish signings. If you were trying to just lower the wage bill you'd obviously just get rid of the shite even if it was at a major loss. We've still got shite while the good players have been flogged.

Well, surely that’s because it’s very easy to sell an Ashley Young, but very difficult to find somebody to buy players like Beye or Heskey, who are over 30 and on over 50,000 per week?




you'd just pay 'em off in that case. What is the point of us having beye in the squad? he's never going to play. We could have sold him to a championship club and offered to pay half his wages for the season. Still would have cost us less than currently

In order to do that you'd still have to find a Championship club willing to pay him £20k a week.  It's nowhere nearly as easy as you make out to get players out of a club who want to stay.

look if we went to a club and said  "you can have beye, we'll pay 70% of his wages till may. and then its upto you and the player if you sign him. Beye gets his money, we save a third on his wages. makes more sense then him rotting in the reserves on full whack
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 30, 2011, 12:39:59 PM

look dave, you've got a player who's not worth a sausage and who isn't going to play. What other reason is there for keeping him? Just pay up his contract and let him leave. It won't cost us a penny more than having him in the reserves till May.

Because - and I know this might be hard to understand - there might come a time when he's needed.


larf! expecting some munich type plane disaster are we?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: dave.woodhall on December 30, 2011, 12:43:11 PM
look if we went to a club and said  "you can have beye, we'll pay 70% of his wages till may. and then its upto you and the player if you sign him. Beye gets his money, we save a third on his wages. makes more sense then him rotting in the reserves on full whack

What a brilliant idea. I can't think why we haven't done that already. Or maybe - and it's a wild stab in the dark but it just might be true - we've already made the offer and nobody wants him.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Clampy on December 30, 2011, 12:45:15 PM
That’s different from what he said the other day, which was essentially “if I’m to bring one in, then the wage bill must be balanced”.




the wage bill thing is just a red herring. its all about lerner making a profit on the good signings to pay for the losses of the rubbish signings. If you were trying to just lower the wage bill you'd obviously just get rid of the shite even if it was at a major loss. We've still got shite while the good players have been flogged.

Well, surely that’s because it’s very easy to sell an Ashley Young, but very difficult to find somebody to buy players like Beye or Heskey, who are over 30 and on over 50,000 per week?




you'd just pay 'em off in that case. What is the point of us having beye in the squad? he's never going to play. We could have sold him to a championship club and offered to pay half his wages for the season. Still would have cost us less than currently

In order to do that you'd still have to find a Championship club willing to pay him £20k a week.  It's nowhere nearly as easy as you make out to get players out of a club who want to stay.

look if we went to a club and said  "you can have beye, we'll pay 70% of his wages till may. and then its upto you and the player if you sign him. Beye gets his money, we save a third on his wages. makes more sense then him rotting in the reserves on full whack

He's at Doncaster on loan at the moment, so it's not as if we're not trying to shift him.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Chris Smith on December 30, 2011, 12:46:27 PM
Are we talking about the Habib Beye who went on loan to Doncaster?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/15823870.stm
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: glasses on December 30, 2011, 12:47:53 PM

you'd just pay 'em off in that case. What is the point of us having beye in the squad? he's never going to play. We could have sold him to a championship club and offered to pay half his wages for the season. Still would have cost us less than currently

Do you really not think we've tried to do that?


Not really. I think the wage bill is a smokescreen and it suits the club to point out the likes of beye as a reason why they can't spend

Yes, of course. They're happy to keep Beye on the wagebill just so they don't have to spend his wages on someone else. Presumably on orders from the President Emeritus's office


look dave, you've got a player who's not worth a sausage and who isn't going to play. What other reason is there for keeping him? Just pay up his contract and let him leave. It won't cost us a penny more than having him in the reserves till May.
So you are saying that you would pay him his wages until the end of his contract, and send him off as a free agent to sign for someone else immediately, rather than keep the player as an employee of the club until his contract reaches its end, use him as back up in emergency situuations, or send him on loan to a championship club with a recall option (unknown I guess).
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 30, 2011, 12:49:03 PM
look if we went to a club and said  "you can have beye, we'll pay 70% of his wages till may. and then its upto you and the player if you sign him. Beye gets his money, we save a third on his wages. makes more sense then him rotting in the reserves on full whack

What a brilliant idea. I can't think why we haven't done that already. Or maybe - and it's a wild stab in the dark but it just might be true - we've already made the offer and nobody wants him.



well i doubt whether we've offered those terms but if we have and there's no taker, pay him off. He's never going to play unless our entire squad and the youth are somehow incapacitated
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dave on December 30, 2011, 12:49:48 PM
That’s different from what he said the other day, which was essentially “if I’m to bring one in, then the wage bill must be balanced”.




the wage bill thing is just a red herring. its all about lerner making a profit on the good signings to pay for the losses of the rubbish signings. If you were trying to just lower the wage bill you'd obviously just get rid of the shite even if it was at a major loss. We've still got shite while the good players have been flogged.

Well, surely that’s because it’s very easy to sell an Ashley Young, but very difficult to find somebody to buy players like Beye or Heskey, who are over 30 and on over 50,000 per week?




you'd just pay 'em off in that case. What is the point of us having beye in the squad? he's never going to play. We could have sold him to a championship club and offered to pay half his wages for the season. Still would have cost us less than currently

In order to do that you'd still have to find a Championship club willing to pay him £20k a week.  It's nowhere nearly as easy as you make out to get players out of a club who want to stay.

look if we went to a club and said  "you can have beye, we'll pay 70% of his wages till may. and then its upto you and the player if you sign him. Beye gets his money, we save a third on his wages. makes more sense then him rotting in the reserves on full whack
Oh, so exactly what we have done then?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 30, 2011, 12:50:48 PM

you'd just pay 'em off in that case. What is the point of us having beye in the squad? he's never going to play. We could have sold him to a championship club and offered to pay half his wages for the season. Still would have cost us less than currently

Do you really not think we've tried to do that?


Not really. I think the wage bill is a smokescreen and it suits the club to point out the likes of beye as a reason why they can't spend

Yes, of course. They're happy to keep Beye on the wagebill just so they don't have to spend his wages on someone else. Presumably on orders from the President Emeritus's office


look dave, you've got a player who's not worth a sausage and who isn't going to play. What other reason is there for keeping him? Just pay up his contract and let him leave. It won't cost us a penny more than having him in the reserves till May.
So you are saying that you would pay him his wages until the end of his contract, and send him off as a free agent to sign for someone else immediately, rather than keep the player as an employee of the club until his contract reaches its end, use him as back up in emergency situuations, or send him on loan to a championship club with a recall option (unknown I guess).


yes indeedy
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: dave.woodhall on December 30, 2011, 12:51:11 PM
look if we went to a club and said  "you can have beye, we'll pay 70% of his wages till may. and then its upto you and the player if you sign him. Beye gets his money, we save a third on his wages. makes more sense then him rotting in the reserves on full whack

What a brilliant idea. I can't think why we haven't done that already. Or maybe - and it's a wild stab in the dark but it just might be true - we've already made the offer and nobody wants him.



well i doubt whether we've offered those terms but if we have and there's no taker, pay him off. He's never going to play unless our entire squad and the youth are somehow incapacitated

See above.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on December 30, 2011, 12:52:30 PM
look if we went to a club and said  "you can have beye, we'll pay 70% of his wages till may. and then its upto you and the player if you sign him. Beye gets his money, we save a third on his wages. makes more sense then him rotting in the reserves on full whack

Like when we tried to send him to Ipswich last season and he refused?  Or like the present deal with Doncaster, as Clamp mentions?

Next.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 30, 2011, 12:53:43 PM
oh please, everyone knows the situation with doncaster. Its just a shop window for players down on their luck, which means some fruitcase at villa still thinks we can get some sort of fee for him
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on December 30, 2011, 12:56:09 PM
oh please, everyone knows the situation with doncaster. Its just a shop window for players down on their luck, which means some fruitcase at villa still thinks we can get some sort of fee for him

*FACEPALM*
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Clampy on December 30, 2011, 12:57:18 PM
A typical Greg response when he's been found out.

Larf!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SheffieldVillain on December 30, 2011, 12:58:32 PM
oh please, everyone knows the situation with doncaster. Its just a shop window for players down on their luck, which means some fruitcase at villa still thinks we can get some sort of fee for him

But they are still paying a percentage of his wage, albeit a small one. Which saves money on Villa either paying his full wage with him sitting in the reserves, or paying his contract up in full.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: glasses on December 30, 2011, 01:01:06 PM

you'd just pay 'em off in that case. What is the point of us having beye in the squad? he's never going to play. We could have sold him to a championship club and offered to pay half his wages for the season. Still would have cost us less than currently

Do you really not think we've tried to do that?


Not really. I think the wage bill is a smokescreen and it suits the club to point out the likes of beye as a reason why they can't spend

Yes, of course. They're happy to keep Beye on the wagebill just so they don't have to spend his wages on someone else. Presumably on orders from the President Emeritus's office


look dave, you've got a player who's not worth a sausage and who isn't going to play. What other reason is there for keeping him? Just pay up his contract and let him leave. It won't cost us a penny more than having him in the reserves till May.
So you are saying that you would pay him his wages until the end of his contract, and send him off as a free agent to sign for someone else immediately, rather than keep the player as an employee of the club until his contract reaches its end, use him as back up in emergency situuations, or send him on loan to a championship club with a recall option (unknown I guess).


yes indeedy
It costs the club the same either way though doesn't it? So is it not better to keep him as back up should we have an epic injury crisis? Are Doncaster at least paying some of his wages? Even if it is as little as 5%, that is still costing the club less than your plan Greg.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 30, 2011, 01:01:58 PM
not really. have you heard whats going on there? For the uniformed its basically where clubs send players they're desperate to get rid of*


*those with an actual value usually.

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dave on December 30, 2011, 01:03:31 PM
not really. have you heard whats going on there? For the uniformed its basically where clubs send players they're desperate to get rid of*


*those with an actual value usually.


So you would rather he were back in our reserves or we were paying his contract up in full, rather than us actually doing what you just said you wanted us to do?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Clampy on December 30, 2011, 01:04:22 PM
not really. have you heard whats going on there? For the uniformed its basically where clubs send players they're desperate to get rid of*


*those with an actual value usually.



Un-informed being the word of the day Greg i think.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SheffieldVillain on December 30, 2011, 01:05:05 PM
not really. have you heard whats going on there? For the uniformed its basically where clubs send players they're desperate to get rid of*


*those with an actual value usually.



Yes, they take players others don't want and pay a small percentage of their wages in return. Which is exactly what you suggested we should do with Beye, and funnily enough is exactly what we are doing with Beye.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: dave.woodhall on December 30, 2011, 01:05:13 PM
not really. have you heard whats going on there? For the uniformed its basically where clubs send players they're desperate to get rid of*


*those with an actual value usually.



Earlier on you said we didn't want to get rid of Beye because he's an excuse not to spend money. Now you're saying the club we loaned him to is somewhere to send players you want to get rid of. Logic doesn't really figure highly Chez Nash does it?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Ryu on December 30, 2011, 01:05:38 PM
Back to Greg's point about it taking a munich style disaster for beye to get near the team. (Even though it's moot as he's out on loan)

Against stoke we played cuellar at right back because our first choice was suspended. Our reserve right back lichaj was injured and the next in line to cover there would have been herd who was also injured. So it wouldn't take a hugely unlikely turn of events to thrust beye into the first team squad.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: johnny from donny on December 30, 2011, 01:06:02 PM
John M'Zog, please read your own sig and take your own advice.
Just hope if we do get another loan player in we negotiate the deal properly and put in the following;
1, a clause so we have an option to buy the player at an agreed fee if things work out for him here.
and 2, a return clause so we are not liable for 5 months wages if he gets injured.
Don't hold out much hope though. As the saying goes; most people live and learn, others just live.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: dave.woodhall on December 30, 2011, 01:06:52 PM
Back to Greg's point about it taking a munich style disaster for beye to get near the team. (Even though it's moot as he's out on loan)

Against stoke we played cuellar at right back because our first choice was suspended. Our reserve right back lichaj was injured and the next in line to cover there would have been herd who was also injured. So it wouldn't take a hugely unlikely turn of events to thrust beye into the first team squad.

It would take an injury crisis of the magnitude we haven't experienced since as far back as last year.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 30, 2011, 01:07:15 PM
look beye is not gonna play. full stop. every defender in the club from youth upwards would have to crocked for him to get a game. Its as ridiculous as keeping Salifou for the remainder of his contract. Totally utterly pointless
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SheffieldVillain on December 30, 2011, 01:08:54 PM
look beye is not gonna play. full stop. every defender in the club from youth upwards would have to crocked for him to get a game. Its as ridiculous as keeping Salifou for the remainder of his contract. Totally utterly pointless

So let's be clear then. You're saying that we should pay the full cost of Beye's contract now, rather than sending him off on loan and paying less of Beye's salary?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Ryu on December 30, 2011, 01:10:13 PM
"look beye is not gonna play. full stop. every defender in the club from youth upwards would have to crocked for him to get a game. Its as ridiculous as keeping Salifou for the remainder of his contract. Totally utterly pointless"


Which is why comma in my opinion comma the club have loaned him out full stop
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 30, 2011, 01:11:58 PM
not really. have you heard whats going on there? For the uniformed its basically where clubs send players they're desperate to get rid of*


*those with an actual value usually.



Earlier on you said we didn't want to get rid of Beye because he's an excuse not to spend money. Now you're saying the club we loaned him to is somewhere to send players you want to get rid of. Logic doesn't really figure highly Chez Nash does it?


Doncaster don't want him, they don't want any of the players they sign. Its just their system. He's not worth anything, putting a worthless player in a shop window is pointless.  Just some and mirrors again.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SheffieldVillain on December 30, 2011, 01:14:11 PM
not really. have you heard whats going on there? For the uniformed its basically where clubs send players they're desperate to get rid of*


*those with an actual value usually.



Earlier on you said we didn't want to get rid of Beye because he's an excuse not to spend money. Now you're saying the club we loaned him to is somewhere to send players you want to get rid of. Logic doesn't really figure highly Chez Nash does it?


Doncaster don't want him, they don't want any of the players they sign. Its just their system. He's not worth anything, putting a worthless player in a shop window is pointless.  Just some and mirrors again.

Who gives a stuff why they've signed him on loan? What possible difference does it make to Villa? He's not hanging around the club and we've shifted part of the cost of his wages to someone else.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on December 30, 2011, 01:15:02 PM
John M'Zog, please read your own sig and take your own advice.

If that's in relation to my responses to Greg, then I actually don't think of him as an idiot.  Instead, he tried to make an anti-Randy/board point out of the wages issue being a smokescreen as otherwise we'd get rid of Beye for whatever we could to save as much wages as possible.  Then, when someone pointed out that Beye is already out on loan, he didn't want to admit he was wrong, so instead is trying the tack that we sent him to the wrong club as it's a shop window for unwanted players.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Clampy on December 30, 2011, 01:15:56 PM
not really. have you heard whats going on there? For the uniformed its basically where clubs send players they're desperate to get rid of*


*those with an actual value usually.



Earlier on you said we didn't want to get rid of Beye because he's an excuse not to spend money. Now you're saying the club we loaned him to is somewhere to send players you want to get rid of. Logic doesn't really figure highly Chez Nash does it?


Doncaster don't want him, they don't want any of the players they sign. Its just their system. He's not worth anything, putting a worthless player in a shop window is pointless.  Just some and mirrors again.

Oh dear, that holes getting bigger Greg. Put the shovel down before you make yourself even more of a berk than you are at the moment.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 30, 2011, 01:17:11 PM
look beye is not gonna play. full stop. every defender in the club from youth upwards would have to crocked for him to get a game. Its as ridiculous as keeping Salifou for the remainder of his contract. Totally utterly pointless

So let's be clear then. You're saying that we should pay the full cost of Beye's contract now, rather than sending him off on loan and paying less of Beye's salary?


this is doncaster we're talking about here. they get the players in the hope the loaning clubs recieve bids due to their performances. I very much doubt we're making anything on it.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Chris Smith on December 30, 2011, 01:17:14 PM
Greg, it's a long time since you went off on one of these ridiculous flights of fancy, it's making me feel quite nostalgic.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 30, 2011, 01:19:12 PM
not really. have you heard whats going on there? For the uniformed its basically where clubs send players they're desperate to get rid of*


*those with an actual value usually.



Earlier on you said we didn't want to get rid of Beye because he's an excuse not to spend money. Now you're saying the club we loaned him to is somewhere to send players you want to get rid of. Logic doesn't really figure highly Chez Nash does it?


Doncaster don't want him, they don't want any of the players they sign. Its just their system. He's not worth anything, putting a worthless player in a shop window is pointless.  Just some and mirrors again.

Oh dear, that holes getting bigger Greg. Put the shovel down before you make yourself even more of a berk than you are at the moment.

please tell me how much you think Doncaster are paying towards Beye's wages then?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on December 30, 2011, 01:20:56 PM
please tell me how much you think Doncaster are paying towards Beye's wages then?

More than us paying up his contract, which you suggested.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SheffieldVillain on December 30, 2011, 01:21:28 PM
look beye is not gonna play. full stop. every defender in the club from youth upwards would have to crocked for him to get a game. Its as ridiculous as keeping Salifou for the remainder of his contract. Totally utterly pointless

So let's be clear then. You're saying that we should pay the full cost of Beye's contract now, rather than sending him off on loan and paying less of Beye's salary?


this is doncaster we're talking about here. they get the players in the hope the loaning clubs recieve bids due to their performances. I very much doubt we're making anything on it.

Well, you'd be wrong again then. This is from the Daily Mail with Wille MacKay describing the system.

Donny will pay a maximum of £2,000 a week towards a player’s existing salary, relying on the parent club to pay the difference in their contract during their loan.

McKay said: ‘Take Herita Ilunga as an example. He’s on £26,000 a week at West Ham, not getting a game and they can’t get him a move. I called the joint-chairman David Sullivan and offered £1,000 a week to take Ilunga on loan. David laughed and said, “Make me a sensible offer”, so I said, “OK, £500”.

‘Anyway, eventually we agree the deal on £2,000 a week and West Ham make up the rest of his wages. We take him at Doncaster, who are no threat to West Ham, and give him a shop window to perform by playing every week.

‘If he plays well and I get him a move, say to Turkey for £5m, then I’ll reach an agreement with David Sullivan about the fee West Ham will receive, plus my commission, less his full £26,000-a-week salary for the period he was at Doncaster.’

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: taylorsworkrate on December 30, 2011, 01:22:17 PM
Isn't it something like 10% of Beye's wages?

Seem to remember that figure being thrown about at the time.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SheffieldVillain on December 30, 2011, 01:24:05 PM
Quote
please tell me how much you think Doncaster are paying towards Beye's wages then?

Between £1k-£2k according to the quotes I've just given you. Which is higher than £0.

So now you've gone from Doncaster definitely not paying anything to intimating that they're not paying enough?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 30, 2011, 01:25:34 PM
look beye is not gonna play. full stop. every defender in the club from youth upwards would have to crocked for him to get a game. Its as ridiculous as keeping Salifou for the remainder of his contract. Totally utterly pointless

So let's be clear then. You're saying that we should pay the full cost of Beye's contract now, rather than sending him off on loan and paying less of Beye's salary?


this is doncaster we're talking about here. they get the players in the hope the loaning clubs recieve bids due to their performances. I very much doubt we're making anything on it.

Well, you'd be wrong again then. This is from the Daily Mail with Wille MacKay describing the system.

Donny will pay a maximum of £2,000 a week towards a player’s existing salary, relying on the parent club to pay the difference in their contract during their loan.

McKay said: ‘Take Herita Ilunga as an example. He’s on £26,000 a week at West Ham, not getting a game and they can’t get him a move. I called the joint-chairman David Sullivan and offered £1,000 a week to take Ilunga on loan. David laughed and said, “Make me a sensible offer”, so I said, “OK, £500”.

‘Anyway, eventually we agree the deal on £2,000 a week and West Ham make up the rest of his wages. We take him at Doncaster, who are no threat to West Ham, and give him a shop window to perform by playing every week.

‘If he plays well and I get him a move, say to Turkey for £5m, then I’ll reach an agreement with David Sullivan about the fee West Ham will receive, plus my commission, less his full £26,000-a-week salary for the period he was at Doncaster.’




larf! and how much is the commission on a worthless player? lets see 25% of 0 is er....
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on December 30, 2011, 01:25:48 PM
Greg, it's a long time since you went off on one of these ridiculous flights of fancy, it's making me feel quite nostalgic.

once the medicine bottle fails to deliver his morning pill real Greg returns with the sort of nonsense we've come to expect. It does set you back doesn't it? Brings a tear to my glass eye. I'm enjoying being transported back to thoughts of Martin the Oppressor and strawberry fields.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SheffieldVillain on December 30, 2011, 01:28:47 PM
Quote from: Greg N'Ash

larf! and how much is the commission on a worthless player? lets see 25% of 0 is er....
[/quote

What possible financial relevance does that have to Villa? They are still paying some of his wages prior to his contract expiring.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 30, 2011, 01:29:21 PM
Quote
please tell me how much you think Doncaster are paying towards Beye's wages then?

Between £1k-£2k according to the quotes I've just given you. Which is higher than £0.

So now you've gone from Doncaster definitely not paying anything to intimating that they're not paying enough?


1-2k is the figure i heard. compared to loaning him out to a proper club at his level its nothing. 4-8k a month on a 40-50k a week contract. pay him off.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on December 30, 2011, 01:30:28 PM
What possible financial relevance does that have to Villa? They are still paying some of his wages prior to his contract expiring.

Yes, but Greg doesn't want that now.  Please do try to keep up!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dave on December 30, 2011, 01:32:28 PM
Quote
please tell me how much you think Doncaster are paying towards Beye's wages then?

Between £1k-£2k according to the quotes I've just given you. Which is higher than £0.

So now you've gone from Doncaster definitely not paying anything to intimating that they're not paying enough?


1-2k is the figure i heard. compared to loaning him out to a proper club at his level its nothing. 4-8k a month on a 40-50k a week contract. pay him off.
So you've now from wanting us to do what we can to save money on Beye's contract to actively wanting it to cost us more?

Impressive piece of lunacy there Greg.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SheffieldVillain on December 30, 2011, 01:33:12 PM
Quote
please tell me how much you think Doncaster are paying towards Beye's wages then?

Between £1k-£2k according to the quotes I've just given you. Which is higher than £0.

So now you've gone from Doncaster definitely not paying anything to intimating that they're not paying enough?


1-2k is the figure i heard. compared to loaning him out to a proper club at his level its nothing. 4-8k a month on a 40-50k a week contract. pay him off.

OK, you're absolutely right - it makes complete sense to shell out £40k-£50k more than we have to.  Well done.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on December 30, 2011, 01:33:24 PM
What possible financial relevance does that have to Villa? They are still paying some of his wages prior to his contract expiring.

Yes, but Greg doesn't want that now.  Please do try to keep up!

I love this one man crusade thing. Long may it last.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: dave.woodhall on December 30, 2011, 01:34:24 PM
Quote
please tell me how much you think Doncaster are paying towards Beye's wages then?

Between £1k-£2k according to the quotes I've just given you. Which is higher than £0.

So now you've gone from Doncaster definitely not paying anything to intimating that they're not paying enough?


1-2k is the figure i heard. compared to loaning him out to a proper club at his level its nothing. 4-8k a month on a 40-50k a week contract. pay him off.

Has it ever occured to you that the reason he went to Doncaster is because nobody else wanted him?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SheffieldVillain on December 30, 2011, 01:34:43 PM
What possible financial relevance does that have to Villa? They are still paying some of his wages prior to his contract expiring.

Yes, but Greg doesn't want that now.  Please do try to keep up!

I don't think I can. I'm going for a mince pie and a hot blackcurrant. Then perhaps the world will make sense again.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: taylorsworkrate on December 30, 2011, 01:36:02 PM
Surely we could have found some usage for Beye by now?

Maybe cleaning boots or working in the cafeteria.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 30, 2011, 01:37:41 PM
well i had no idea the finances was so out of control that we had to keep hold of a player for the sake of 4k a month, but i stand corrected. Maybe the poor results are just a cunning plan by AM to bolster the January transfer fund. Just think who we could pay with all the savings from the unpaid win bonuses
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 30, 2011, 01:38:55 PM
Quote
please tell me how much you think Doncaster are paying towards Beye's wages then?

Between £1k-£2k according to the quotes I've just given you. Which is higher than £0.

So now you've gone from Doncaster definitely not paying anything to intimating that they're not paying enough?


1-2k is the figure i heard. compared to loaning him out to a proper club at his level its nothing. 4-8k a month on a 40-50k a week contract. pay him off.

Has it ever occured to you that the reason he went to Doncaster is because nobody else wanted him?


yes it has. PAY HIM OFF. HE WON'T PLAY FOR US
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: dave.woodhall on December 30, 2011, 01:44:00 PM
Quote
please tell me how much you think Doncaster are paying towards Beye's wages then?

Between £1k-£2k according to the quotes I've just given you. Which is higher than £0.

So now you've gone from Doncaster definitely not paying anything to intimating that they're not paying enough?


1-2k is the figure i heard. compared to loaning him out to a proper club at his level its nothing. 4-8k a month on a 40-50k a week contract. pay him off.

Has it ever occured to you that the reason he went to Doncaster is because nobody else wanted him?

yes it has. PAY HIM OFF. HE WON'T PLAY FOR US

Again, you're contradicting yourself. You said we should offer him to other clubs on reduced wages and now you agree that we tried that and there were no takers. Except for the one who did take him. And please don't shout.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: glasses on December 30, 2011, 01:47:45 PM
well i had no idea the finances was so out of control that we had to keep hold of a player for the sake of 4k a month, but i stand corrected. Maybe the poor results are just a cunning plan by AM to bolster the January transfer fund. Just think who we could pay with all the sayings from the unpaid win bonuses
I dont want to do this Greg, but perhaps if you invested someof your hard earned cash into the club, you would perhaps be against paying someone off vast sums, instead of cutting your losses by taking some money from another club.

I get the sentiment, he is shite, not good enough for us however you want to dress it up. However, the current situation is better for us than your solution.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 30, 2011, 01:48:32 PM
Quote
please tell me how much you think Doncaster are paying towards Beye's wages then?

Between £1k-£2k according to the quotes I've just given you. Which is higher than £0.

So now you've gone from Doncaster definitely not paying anything to intimating that they're not paying enough?


1-2k is the figure i heard. compared to loaning him out to a proper club at his level its nothing. 4-8k a month on a 40-50k a week contract. pay him off.

Has it ever occured to you that the reason he went to Doncaster is because nobody else wanted him?

yes it has. PAY HIM OFF. HE WON'T PLAY FOR US

Again, you're contradicting yourself. You said we should offer him to other clubs on reduced wages and now you agree that we tried that and there were no takers. Except for the one who did take him. And please don't shout.
Please don't shout.


i suggested we offer him to a club and pay 70% of his wages which is about rougthly 11-15k a week they'd have find At no time did i suggest 1-2k a week which is paying near enough all of it anyway for no benefit at all. If thats the best deal we can get then pay him off.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on December 30, 2011, 01:51:54 PM
Quote
please tell me how much you think Doncaster are paying towards Beye's wages then?

Between £1k-£2k according to the quotes I've just given you. Which is higher than £0.

So now you've gone from Doncaster definitely not paying anything to intimating that they're not paying enough?


1-2k is the figure i heard. compared to loaning him out to a proper club at his level its nothing. 4-8k a month on a 40-50k a week contract. pay him off.

Has it ever occured to you that the reason he went to Doncaster is because nobody else wanted him?

yes it has. PAY HIM OFF. HE WON'T PLAY FOR US

Again, you're contradicting yourself. You said we should offer him to other clubs on reduced wages and now you agree that we tried that and there were no takers. Except for the one who did take him. And please don't shout.
Please don't shout.


i suggested we offer him to a club and pay 70% of his wages which is about rougthly 11-15k a week they'd have find At no time did i suggest 1-2k a week which is paying near enough all of it anyway for no benefit at all. If thats the best deal we can get then pay him off.

quite frankly Greg, given where we are we need the bodies. I'd be tempted to offer him a new deal.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Ryu on December 30, 2011, 01:52:19 PM
Please stop this everybody!  Following this thread is fast becoming more boring than working.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: dave.woodhall on December 30, 2011, 01:52:46 PM
If we can't get some money we should get none at all. Logic, Greg-style
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithesShin on December 30, 2011, 01:53:23 PM
I've always quite rated Beye. Never felt he was given a fair crack of the whip. Get him back from Donny and play him. If he proves himself then give him a new contract and we save a fortune.

Edit: TV beat me to it.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on December 30, 2011, 01:53:56 PM
Please stop this everybody!  Following this thread is fast becoming more boring than working.

Totally disagree - I thought this would be an awful few days at work, but this afternoon has really made it all worthwhile! 
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: bertlambshank on December 30, 2011, 01:54:40 PM
I agree with TV offer a new contract.I am off to start a Facebook campaign.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on December 30, 2011, 01:54:56 PM
I've always quite rated Beye. Never felt he was given a fair crack of the whip. Get him back from Donny and play him. If he proves himself then give him a new contract and we save a fortune.

when you consider a new full back might be 2-3 million plus signing bonus and wages, we'd be better keeping Beye around for a year or two more.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Ryu on December 30, 2011, 01:56:31 PM
I'm glad you're enjoying it, John. But logic twisting of this level hurts my poor head.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithesShin on December 30, 2011, 01:56:50 PM
I've always quite rated Beye. Never felt he was given a fair crack of the whip. Get him back from Donny and play him. If he proves himself then give him a new contract and we save a fortune.

when you consider a new full back might be 2-3 million plus signing bonus and wages, we'd be better keeping Beye around for a year or two more.

Exactly, money in the bank that we can then spend on a CM. Makes perfect business sense to me.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 30, 2011, 02:00:18 PM
If we can't get some money we should get none at all. Logic, Greg-style

well if you really think that 4k a month is going to make any difference.  Maybe AM will announce a signing in May and claim it was funded by the 20k Beye Memorial fund....
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: hawkeye on December 30, 2011, 02:01:14 PM
Dunno if any one can elighten me, but i have never understood how this situation developed. MON bought him, then didnt play him and he dissapeared. I never saw him make comments in the Media, when he did play he was played out of position with a scratch defence. So what happened?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: cdbearsfan on December 30, 2011, 02:02:42 PM
I'd give Beye a new deal too. He's never really been given a fair chance at Villa Park. I saw him play for the reserves a couple of years ago against Crewe and it was like watching Giuseppe Bergomi in his pomp.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dave Cooper please on December 30, 2011, 02:03:05 PM
If we can't get some money we should get none at all. Logic, Greg-style

well if you really think that 4k a month is going to make any difference.  Maybe AM will announce a signing in May and claim it was funded by the 20k Beye Memorial fund....

4K a month could be the diference between giving one of our academy a professional contract or releasing him, that player could then go on to play for our first team, thus saving us even more money, he could even turn out to be a star.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 30, 2011, 02:05:00 PM
Dunno if any one can elighten me, but i have never understood how this situation developed. MON bought him, then didnt play him and he dissapeared. I never saw him make comments in the Media, when he did play he was played out of position with a scratch defence. So what happened?

*sigh* MON buys shit player, MON realises he's shit 6 months after everyone else. Player disappears off the planet.. See also Davies. MFH, Sidwell, Shorey, add your own example.....
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: glasses on December 30, 2011, 02:06:44 PM
If we can't get some money we should get none at all. Logic, Greg-style

well if you really think that 4k a month is going to make any difference.  Maybe AM will announce a signing in May and claim it was funded by the 20k Beye Memorial fund....
£20000.00 is more than my current annual salary. £20000.00 could pay some of the non footballing staffs wages. Catering or merchandise sales people. £20000.00 may not feel like much to you, but if you ask any self respecting business in this current climate if they had a way to reduce a loss by £20000.00 whether they would take it or not, I think you will find they would take it.   
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithesShin on December 30, 2011, 02:07:09 PM
He showed what he could bring to the club when he came on against Hereford. That mazy run was almost Messiesque.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SamTheMouse on December 30, 2011, 02:07:49 PM
Sorry, stupid question alert:

Do we know exactly how much Beye is on? And when does his contract run out?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 30, 2011, 02:08:14 PM
If we can't get some money we should get none at all. Logic, Greg-style

well if you really think that 4k a month is going to make any difference.  Maybe AM will announce a signing in May and claim it was funded by the 20k Beye Memorial fund....

4K a month could be the diference between giving one of our academy a professional contract or releasing him, that player could then go on to play for our first team, thus saving us even more money, he could even turn out to be a star.


while that's true, i suppose turning off the lights in the carpark an hour earlier would make a decent saving. The point is if we're worried about 4k a month then we really are in the shit.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Percy McCarthy on December 30, 2011, 02:11:47 PM
Nice to see greg's finger as firmly on the pulse as ever. It's a first to see him disagreeing with himself though.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dave Cooper please on December 30, 2011, 02:12:00 PM
while that's true, i suppose turning off the lights in the carpark an hour earlier would make a decent saving. The point is if we're worried about 4k a month then we really are in the shit.

I don't think Villa are worried about 4k a week per se. but they have stated 9or at least McLeish has said as much in interviews) that there is a wage budget that he must stick to, so if saving a few quid on a couple of loanees allows him the room to offer a promising kid his first professional contract then that's good surely.
Anyway, I believe Beye is ready to take a small pay cut to get another contract here, so even more good news.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: bertlambshank on December 30, 2011, 02:12:56 PM
If we can't get some money we should get none at all. Logic, Greg-style

well if you really think that 4k a month is going to make any difference.  Maybe AM will announce a signing in May and claim it was funded by the 20k Beye Memorial fund....

4K a month could be the diference between giving one of our academy a professional contract or releasing him, that player could then go on to play for our first team, thus saving us even more money, he could even turn out to be a star.
I worry about 4 quid a month,it's all about scale.


while that's true, i suppose turning off the lights in the carpark an hour earlier would make a decent saving. The point is if we're worried about 4k a month then we really are in the shit.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SheffieldVillain on December 30, 2011, 02:14:18 PM
while that's true, i suppose turning off the lights in the carpark an hour earlier would make a decent saving. The point is if we're worried about 4k a month then we really are in the shit.

I don't think Villa are worried about 4k a week per se. but they have stated 9or at least McLeish has said as much in interviews) that there is a wage budget that he must stick to, so if saving a few quid on a couple of loanees allows him the room to offer a promising kid his first professional contract then that's good surely.
Anyway, I believe Beye is ready to take a small pay cut to get another contract here, so even more good news.

And if he does that, perhaps others might follow suit. Big Emile for one. Emile at £60k - no thanks. Emile at £40k, well then you're beginning to talk value for money.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 30, 2011, 02:14:46 PM
If we can't get some money we should get none at all. Logic, Greg-style

well if you really think that 4k a month is going to make any difference.  Maybe AM will announce a signing in May and claim it was funded by the 20k Beye Memorial fund....
£20000.00 is more than my current annual salary. £20000.00 could pay some of the non footballing staffs wages. Catering or merchandise sales people. £20000.00 may not feel like much to you, but if you ask any self respecting business in this current climate if they had a way to reduce a loss by £20000.00 whether they would take it or not, I think you will find they would take it.   

I totally agree in the real world, but this is football. When you post losses of 40m, a saving 4k a month isn't going to have any effect on the wage bill
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SheffieldVillain on December 30, 2011, 02:15:57 PM
If we can't get some money we should get none at all. Logic, Greg-style

well if you really think that 4k a month is going to make any difference.  Maybe AM will announce a signing in May and claim it was funded by the 20k Beye Memorial fund....
£20000.00 is more than my current annual salary. £20000.00 could pay some of the non footballing staffs wages. Catering or merchandise sales people. £20000.00 may not feel like much to you, but if you ask any self respecting business in this current climate if they had a way to reduce a loss by £20000.00 whether they would take it or not, I think you will find they would take it.   

I totally agree in the real world, but this is football. When you post losses of 40m, a saving 4k a month isn't going to have any effect on the wage bill

Yes it is, it's going to make it £4k a month less.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: bertlambshank on December 30, 2011, 02:17:32 PM
But that could buy new ovens and the pies would be hotter.
That wouldn't worry you though would it.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: hawkeye on December 30, 2011, 02:18:24 PM
Dunno if any one can elighten me, but i have never understood how this situation developed. MON bought him, then didnt play him and he dissapeared. I never saw him make comments in the Media, when he did play he was played out of position with a scratch defence. So what happened?
[/quote

*sigh* MON buys shit player, MON realises he's shit 6 months after everyone else. Player disappears off the planet.. See also Davies. MFH, Sidwell, Shorey, add your own example.....
(sigh)The difference is all those players got a run in the team, Beye hardly played and dissapeared.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: glasses on December 30, 2011, 02:18:56 PM
You clearly have the business acumen of Rodney Trotter then Greg.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SheffieldVillain on December 30, 2011, 02:19:43 PM
Never to be seen again through three subsequent managers (Houllier, Kevin Mac and McLeish). Perhaps they just can't see what we see in him.

Quote
Dunno if any one can elighten me, but i have never understood how this situation developed. MON bought him, then didnt play him and he dissapeared. I never saw him make comments in the Media, when he did play he was played out of position with a scratch defence. So what happened?
[/quote

*sigh* MON buys shit player, MON realises he's shit 6 months after everyone else. Player disappears off the planet.. See also Davies. MFH, Sidwell, Shorey, add your own example.....

(sigh)The difference is all those players got a run in the team, Beye hardly played and dissapeared.

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 30, 2011, 02:21:11 PM
If we can't get some money we should get none at all. Logic, Greg-style

well if you really think that 4k a month is going to make any difference.  Maybe AM will announce a signing in May and claim it was funded by the 20k Beye Memorial fund....
£20000.00 is more than my current annual salary. £20000.00 could pay some of the non footballing staffs wages. Catering or merchandise sales people. £20000.00 may not feel like much to you, but if you ask any self respecting business in this current climate if they had a way to reduce a loss by £20000.00 whether they would take it or not, I think you will find they would take it.   

I totally agree in the real world, but this is football. When you post losses of 40m, a saving 4k a month isn't going to have any effect on the wage bill

Yes it is, it's going to make it £4k a month less.


well thats a relief. Just the other 39,980,000 to worry about now.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SheffieldVillain on December 30, 2011, 02:23:03 PM
If we can't get some money we should get none at all. Logic, Greg-style

well if you really think that 4k a month is going to make any difference.  Maybe AM will announce a signing in May and claim it was funded by the 20k Beye Memorial fund....
£20000.00 is more than my current annual salary. £20000.00 could pay some of the non footballing staffs wages. Catering or merchandise sales people. £20000.00 may not feel like much to you, but if you ask any self respecting business in this current climate if they had a way to reduce a loss by £20000.00 whether they would take it or not, I think you will find they would take it.   

I totally agree in the real world, but this is football. When you post losses of 40m, a saving 4k a month isn't going to have any effect on the wage bill

Yes it is, it's going to make it £4k a month less.


well thats a relief. Just the other 39,980,000 to worry about now.

Don't worry. Be happy.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 30, 2011, 02:23:59 PM
You clearly have the business acumen of Rodney Trotter then Greg.


and i reckon you work for the EU. worrying about the pennies when its the big expenses you want to get down


And rodney trotter ended up a millionaire *winky*
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Clampy on December 30, 2011, 02:27:22 PM
I go away for a coffee and a few choccy biscuits and find the mad and hopelessly wrong ramblings of GregNaff still rumbling on. Like others have hinted, i do find it a puzzle that he's so very concerned about the financial situation of a club which he openly admits he has no intention of putting any money into.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 30, 2011, 02:31:31 PM
I go away for a coffee and a few choccy biscuits and find the mad and hopelessly wrong ramblings of GregNaff still rumbling on. Like others have hinted, i do find it a puzzle that he's so very concerned about the financial situation of a club which he openly admits he has no intention of putting any money into.


A bizarre statement frankly. I could buy a season ticket for the rest of my life and it probably wouldn't cover Beye's weekly wage
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Clampy on December 30, 2011, 02:33:51 PM
I go away for a coffee and a few choccy biscuits and find the mad and hopelessly wrong ramblings of GregNaff still rumbling on. Like others have hinted, i do find it a puzzle that he's so very concerned about the financial situation of a club which he openly admits he has no intention of putting any money into.


A bizarre statement frankly.

Nowhere near as bizarre as what you've come out with today.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 30, 2011, 02:36:34 PM
what? Beye isn't worth keeping for the 2k a week we may be saving on his wages till May?


Shocking leftfield stuff i must say.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: glasses on December 30, 2011, 02:40:20 PM
He did. I was thinking more along the 1st ever episode where he advises Del to buy 25 suitcases for £200, rather than the £175 price he agreed with Trigger. Then, advised him to throw them all in the river!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 30, 2011, 02:42:16 PM
He did. I was thinking more along the 1st ever episode where he advises Del to buy 25 suitcases for £200, rather than the £175 price he agreed with Trigger. Then, advised him to throw them all in the river!


Think you've got me confused with MON. Sounds like one of his transfer deals
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Ger Regan on December 30, 2011, 02:44:28 PM
I go away for a coffee and a few choccy biscuits and find the mad and hopelessly wrong ramblings of GregNaff still rumbling on. Like others have hinted, i do find it a puzzle that he's so very concerned about the financial situation of a club which he openly admits he has no intention of putting any money into.


A bizarre statement frankly. I could buy a season ticket for the rest of my life and it probably wouldn't cover Beye's weekly wage
Quite right, and why pay taxes either? You could pay them for the rest of your life and never make a dent in the national deficit.
Have you ever considered that the beye deal could be part of some overall plan for reducing costs rather than something to be looked at in isolation? And yes, it does appear that we are that much of a pickle financially.
Actually looking back at how the last year or so has gone, plan might be too strong a word....
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on December 30, 2011, 02:44:42 PM
I go away for a coffee and a few choccy biscuits and find the mad and hopelessly wrong ramblings of GregNaff still rumbling on. Like others have hinted, i do find it a puzzle that he's so very concerned about the financial situation of a club which he openly admits he has no intention of putting any money into.


A bizarre statement frankly. I could buy a season ticket for the rest of my life and it probably wouldn't cover Beye's weekly wage

you stating that you might buy a ticket let alone a season ticket is bizarre.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulTheVillan on December 30, 2011, 02:47:41 PM
Yawn.

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 30, 2011, 02:48:00 PM
I go away for a coffee and a few choccy biscuits and find the mad and hopelessly wrong ramblings of GregNaff still rumbling on. Like others have hinted, i do find it a puzzle that he's so very concerned about the financial situation of a club which he openly admits he has no intention of putting any money into.


A bizarre statement frankly. I could buy a season ticket for the rest of my life and it probably wouldn't cover Beye's weekly wage

you stating that you might buy a ticket let alone a season ticket is bizarre.


yes that would be bizarre for someone who went continually for15 years. *facepalm*
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: glasses on December 30, 2011, 02:49:05 PM
Not really Greg. You want to throw all of the suitcases in the river. Most people would try to at least get some of their money back. Its actually quite a good analogy
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on December 30, 2011, 02:54:04 PM
I go away for a coffee and a few choccy biscuits and find the mad and hopelessly wrong ramblings of GregNaff still rumbling on. Like others have hinted, i do find it a puzzle that he's so very concerned about the financial situation of a club which he openly admits he has no intention of putting any money into.


A bizarre statement frankly. I could buy a season ticket for the rest of my life and it probably wouldn't cover Beye's weekly wage

you stating that you might buy a ticket let alone a season ticket is bizarre.


yes that would be bizarre for someone who went continually for15 years. *facepalm*

yes, but aren't you still in Lord Byron style self imposed exile?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 30, 2011, 02:57:25 PM
Not really Greg. You want to throw all of the suitcases in the river. Most people would try to at least get some of their money back. Its actually quite a good analogy

not really because its the scale of the losses. Again bringing the EU into it again, they can sit there and say we've saved 80billion by doing this but if the losses are over a trillion it's pocket money and not worth bothering about. likewise saving 20k till the end of the season is welcome in a "bolting the stable door after the horse has gone" sort of way, but the reality is we've still paying him 750k till the end of the season minimum.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on December 30, 2011, 02:58:45 PM
*facepalm*

That confirms it - the Gnasher is back to form!!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: cdbearsfan on December 30, 2011, 03:08:14 PM
*facepalm*

That confirms it - the Gnasher is back to form!!

*larf*
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dave on December 30, 2011, 03:09:56 PM
Not really Greg. You want to throw all of the suitcases in the river. Most people would try to at least get some of their money back. Its actually quite a good analogy

not really because its the scale of the losses. Again bringing the EU into it again, they can sit there and say we've saved 80billion by doing this but if the losses are over a trillion it's pocket money and not worth bothering about. likewise saving 20k till the end of the season is welcome in a "bolting the stable door after the horse has gone" sort of way, but the reality is we've still paying him 750k till the end of the season minimum.
So remind us how doing it this way disadvantages us?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: glasses on December 30, 2011, 03:11:05 PM
Thing is Greg, neither end result is good, but one is £20k lighter. As a business, you would choose the option that is £20k lighter.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 30, 2011, 03:15:10 PM
I go away for a coffee and a few choccy biscuits and find the mad and hopelessly wrong ramblings of GregNaff still rumbling on. Like others have hinted, i do find it a puzzle that he's so very concerned about the financial situation of a club which he openly admits he has no intention of putting any money into.


A bizarre statement frankly. I could buy a season ticket for the rest of my life and it probably wouldn't cover Beye's weekly wage
Quite right, and why pay taxes either? You could pay them for the rest of your life and never make a dent in the national deficit.
Have you ever considered that the beye deal could be part of some overall plan for reducing costs rather than something to be looked at in isolation? And yes, it does appear that we are that much of a pickle financially.
Actually looking back at how the last year or so has gone, plan might be too strong a word....


we must be in a pickle. in fact Haywards obviously haven't got anything on us. Beye's deal may well be part of some big plan to get us back on track but somehow getting some joke club to put him in a non-existant shop window when he's worth nothing to us for the sake of them paying the cost of about half of one week's wages...well the mind boggles.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Ryu on December 30, 2011, 03:22:28 PM
But greg your original moan was that we were keeping him at the club when we should be offloading him on someone else.

Now, transfer speculation, anyone?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on December 30, 2011, 03:24:26 PM
But greg your original moan was that we were keeping him at the club when we should be offloading him on someone else.

Now, transfer speculation, anyone?

I hear we're loaning Heskey to Doncaster.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Ryu on December 30, 2011, 03:26:52 PM
That's a disgrace. We should just give him an oversized novelty check paying up his contract and let another club have him for nothing!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 30, 2011, 03:28:18 PM
But greg your original moan was that we were keeping him at the club when we should be offloading him on someone else.

Now, transfer speculation, anyone?


 For a decent percentage of his wages being paid . I suggested 30% not 2%. Anything less than 10% you might as well pay him off
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TheSandman on December 30, 2011, 03:33:56 PM
The question one has to ask is whether someone would be daft enough to take him for that. They wouldn't. Also, I presume we could not force him to leave hence why the deal to go to Ipswich fell through. £1K a week as pitiful and nigh on pointless as it seems is better than nothing.

To be honest it's not Beye that concerns me. The ship has sailled and we've squandered £40K a week for two a half years on it. He'll be gone soon. It's the overpaid tat that we will still have and who might have their stays extended that concern me more.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 30, 2011, 03:42:24 PM
The question one has to ask is whether someone would be daft enough to take him for that. They wouldn't. Also, I presume we could not force him to leave hence why the deal to go to Ipswich fell through. £1K a week as pitiful and nigh on pointless as it seems is better than nothing.

To be honest it's not Beye that concerns me. The ship has sailled and we've squandered £40K a week for two a half years on it. He'll be gone soon. It's the overpaid tat that we will still have and who might have their stays extended that concern me more.


precisely. We could never have signed beye and we'd still have the same current problems. Just have to write it off. What the club were doing allowing a fuckwitt like MON that much a say in contracts deserves a book in itself
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: hawkeye on December 30, 2011, 03:47:11 PM
I guess that there must be a situation to pay Beye off would save money, an ex gratia payment could be less than wages as it can be paid free of tax, they would also save on Insurance and air fresheners.
 I guess they havent done it because there would be a que outside Faulkners office for the same deal.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: spangley1812 on December 30, 2011, 03:53:11 PM
BBC Sport is saying the Cahill deal is nowhere near done as "they are miles apart on personal terms"

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 30, 2011, 03:59:00 PM
I guess that there must be a situation to pay Beye off would save money, an ex gratia payment could be less than wages as it can be paid free of tax, they would also save on Insurance and air fresheners.
 I guess they havent done it because there would be a que outside Faulkners office for the same deal.

there's loads of savings that could be made by paying him off early as well. Shirt names for instance. If he left then with Heskey being the only other player with a Y in his name we wouldn't have to worry about keeping that letter in stock.  If someone wanted Gabby the staff could improvise with a couple of I's
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: dave.woodhall on December 30, 2011, 04:07:13 PM
I go away for a coffee and a few choccy biscuits and find the mad and hopelessly wrong ramblings of GregNaff still rumbling on. Like others have hinted, i do find it a puzzle that he's so very concerned about the financial situation of a club which he openly admits he has no intention of putting any money into.


A bizarre statement frankly. I could buy a season ticket for the rest of my life and it probably wouldn't cover Beye's weekly wage

There's more chance of Doug getting a knighthood.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on December 30, 2011, 04:13:32 PM
I go away for a coffee and a few choccy biscuits and find the mad and hopelessly wrong ramblings of GregNaff still rumbling on. Like others have hinted, i do find it a puzzle that he's so very concerned about the financial situation of a club which he openly admits he has no intention of putting any money into.


A bizarre statement frankly. I could buy a season ticket for the rest of my life and it probably wouldn't cover Beye's weekly wage

There's more chance of Doug getting a knighthood.

I can't see either happening but if I had to go with one it would be Doug. Perish the thought of the Witton being called the The Sir Doug Ellis stand.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 30, 2011, 04:16:45 PM
meh. Way i see it the same people who are going on about me questioning the point of saving 4k a month are the same people who 3 years ago were saying " why are you worried about our squad greg? there's no budget greg, the general said so, you're mad, we loaded etc., etc.," Now they've all  changed their tune rather quickly

Time passes and eventually the Voice of Reason is proven right. Again.

Off to the pub.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: dave.woodhall on December 30, 2011, 04:24:56 PM
Has anyone else ever noticed that it's always the biggest fuckwits who say "I'm right. I'm always right"?

I now have this image of Greg standing in a pub, talking to someone but not drinking because what's the point? You're in there the same as they are but you're not spending any money.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Chris Jameson on December 30, 2011, 04:29:43 PM
Talking at someone surely?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithesShin on December 30, 2011, 04:34:14 PM
I wonder when they say something he disagrees with if Greg says facepalm or if he does the actions.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on December 30, 2011, 04:40:47 PM
Time passes and eventually the Voice of Reason is proven right. Again

He really is in his own little world, isn't he?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on December 30, 2011, 04:42:20 PM
I wonder when they say something he disagrees with if Greg says facepalm or if he does the actions.

I think he just shouts facepalm as opposed to performing it visually. He might even have it written down on a card hat he pulls out of his jacket and waves at people as and when it is required.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Damo70 on December 30, 2011, 04:52:14 PM
Two and two equals five time. I see that in the same week AM has been talking about looking at the striking options with Bent and Heskey's injuries Kris Boyd has left his Turkish club Somewhereorsomethingspor. He tried to get him at the Blues, but that was before he flopped at Boro.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithesShin on December 30, 2011, 04:53:10 PM
I wonder when they say something he disagrees with if Greg says facepalm or if he does the actions.

I think he just shouts facepalm as opposed to performing it visually. He might even have it written down on a card hat he pulls out of his jacket and waves at people as and when it is required.

*larf*
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SheffieldVillain on December 30, 2011, 04:54:53 PM
meh. Way i see it the same people who are going on about me questioning the point of saving 4k a month are the same people who 3 years ago were saying " why are you worried about our squad greg? there's no budget greg, the general said so, you're mad, we loaded etc., etc.," Now they've all  changed their tune rather quickly

Time passes and eventually the Voice of Reason is proven right. Again.

Off to the pub.

You mean you've been posting the load of twaddle you've come out with this afternoon before you started drinking?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Small Rodent on December 30, 2011, 05:08:57 PM
Sorry, stupid question alert:

Do we know exactly how much Beye is on? And when does his contract run out?


Villa Rodents United
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Percy McCarthy on December 30, 2011, 05:28:34 PM
It was before he started drinking, but I think the moment he completely changed his mind was shortly after he got his crack pipe out. Either that or he finally clocked on that the club had done exactly what he was calling for so he had to quickly change his mind or admit they'd done something right.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: joe_c on December 30, 2011, 06:10:20 PM
"What are you drinking Greg?"
"A *larf* of shandy please."
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mister E on December 30, 2011, 06:32:57 PM
So, no transfer spec then?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JUAN PABLO on December 30, 2011, 08:05:36 PM

look dave, you've got a player who's not worth a sausage and who isn't going to play. What other reason is there for keeping him? Just pay up his contract and let him leave. It won't cost us a penny more than having him in the reserves till May.

Because - and I know this might be hard to understand - there might come a time when he's needed.

Dave's on the left over Sherry ;)
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: frankmosswasmyuncle on December 30, 2011, 08:10:38 PM
Who exactly is Sherry?
And why should Dave be over her on the left?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Davey B on December 30, 2011, 08:13:40 PM
Who exactly is Sherry?
And why should Dave be over her on the left?

 ;D
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: paul_e on December 30, 2011, 08:25:04 PM
Grrr

Logged on for the first time today, saw about 12 pages on this thread and got excited...

Damn you gnasher
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JUAN PABLO on December 30, 2011, 08:32:38 PM
Grrr

Logged on for the first time today, saw about 12 pages on this thread and got excited...

Damn you gnasher

yes and the 12 pages before were ' shall we sell Bent '    . It does get depressing .
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on December 30, 2011, 08:42:48 PM
Grrr

Logged on for the first time today, saw about 12 pages on this thread and got excited...

Damn you gnasher

you had to be here paul. It was ace watching him dig holes.
Title: Transfer
Post by: cdbearsfan on December 30, 2011, 08:44:13 PM
The Hare is going back to Forest.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TheSandman on December 30, 2011, 08:44:42 PM
As long as he's not coming back to Villa.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Matt C on December 30, 2011, 08:58:23 PM
Frimpong, who we were linked to, is off to Wolves on loan for the rest of the season according to the BBC.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: luke25 on December 30, 2011, 09:00:49 PM
Frimpong, who we were linked to, is off to Wolves on loan for the rest of the season according to the BBC.
That should please the locals, they're forever telling me they need a creative midfielder and they go and get a wall.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: kippaxvilla2 on December 30, 2011, 09:01:27 PM
So is Bent going to Racist FC then?  Colin 'Patronising twat' Murray on about it with Molby tonight.  It was like we didn't even exist.  I  hate football these days.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Confusious says on December 30, 2011, 09:27:49 PM
BBC Sport is saying the Cahill deal is nowhere near done as "they are miles apart on personal terms"


If Cahill does go to Chelski,  what sell on percentage would we receive
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dave on December 30, 2011, 09:31:38 PM
BBC Sport is saying the Cahill deal is nowhere near done as "they are miles apart on personal terms"


If Cahill does go to Chelski,  what sell on percentage would we receive
It's not been disclosed. But the rumour is anywhere between 10-20% of anything received over the £5m they paid originally.

So basically, nothing worth getting excited about.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on December 30, 2011, 10:23:41 PM
Three months of heskeys wages so no need to of load in Jan, relief that he can stay.....



Frimpong is a good player but not sure much better than herd in there and worse than Clark for me... would prefer collision or noble from west ham on the cheap.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithesShin on December 30, 2011, 10:28:47 PM
From the bits i've seen Frimpong looks as if he could be a decent player considering he's only 19.
Noble would be a no for for me, Collison maybe but i've not really seen enough of him. Didn't he have a bad injury a year or so ago?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: kippaxvilla2 on December 30, 2011, 10:49:34 PM
If and it is money is limited then we should go out and take that winger off Small Heath ~ Redmond or Mutch the one who played in Europe the other week.  Looks like a young well Ashley Young.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Shrek on December 30, 2011, 10:51:29 PM
An I the only person that things Herd is better than Clark in midfield?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 30, 2011, 10:55:58 PM
Grrr

Logged on for the first time today, saw about 12 pages on this thread and got excited...

Damn you gnasher


Heh.  Soz like, but you know how it is. Women want to meet me, men want to be me, and EVERYONE wants to talk about me, but i've learned to live with it

Anyway i just thought it was worth pointing out that Beye's continuing presence was probably worth more to a club pushing a "one in-one out" transfer policy in PR value than the pittance we'd get for him if we allowed a club to buy out his contract with wages help from us or to just to pay-up his contract. AM was making it very clear only today that he has to sell to buy. I wonder who he'll choose to sell? erm let me guess....the expensive one where the owner can pocket half the transfer fee and let the loose change fall into AM's hands? Like the 15 odd million that disappeared from the Young and Downing fee's? But its not the club's fault. The wage bill is massive and look over there, we've still got the likes of Beye costing us money. That naughty so and so is draining the club dry on his own even as we watch.. Can't see that scenario happening can you?

But then this is the board where most of them swallowed the clubs earlier "there is no transfer budget, we have the money to buy 30m players" bobbins hook line and sinker, so its hardly surprising Lerner's tried it again with almost identical sucess. Bizarrely the same people who used to lecture me on how rich we were, now lecture me on how poor we are, such is their blind obedience.  If Lerner announced the club would now only be signing players from clubs beginning with the letter Z, they'd undoubtably be claiming that was the way forward as well. But then he did pay for a coach trip. 

As they say, there's one born every minute but at least i tried. .....Again.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithesShin on December 30, 2011, 11:17:19 PM
But then this is the board where most of them swallowed the clubs earlier "there is no transfer budget, we have the money to buy 30m players" bobbins hook line and sinker,

Why would we need 30 million players? Has Barry Fry taken over while I wasn't looking?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dave Cooper please on December 30, 2011, 11:21:19 PM

Heh.  Soz like, but you know how it is. Women want to meet me, men want to be me, and EVERYONE wants to talk about me, but i've learned to live with it


Sorry to break it to you Gnash, but actually everyone thinks you are a massive ****** and are all laughing at you, but you carry on regardless.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: olaftab on December 30, 2011, 11:21:26 PM
An I the only person that things Herd is better than Clark in midfield?
I like both of them.
Different players and they will compliment each other and they are our future midfield core.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: kippaxvilla2 on December 30, 2011, 11:22:37 PM
Can't disagree with any of what Greg says there.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithesShin on December 30, 2011, 11:23:05 PM
An I the only person that things Herd is better than Clark in midfield?
I like both of them.
Different players and they will compliment each other and they are our future midfield core.

When talking about them to non Villa fans I always try explaining it as Herd is a NRC type player while Clark looks more like a Barry type player.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 30, 2011, 11:27:47 PM

Heh.  Soz like, but you know how it is. Women want to meet me, men want to be me, and EVERYONE wants to talk about me, but i've learned to live with it


Sorry to break it to you Gnash, but actually everyone thinks you are a massive c*** and are all laughing at you, but you carry on regardless.


heh. i take it "everyone" is your multiple personality disorder
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on December 30, 2011, 11:29:38 PM

Heh.  Soz like, but you know how it is. Women want to meet me, men want to be me, and EVERYONE wants to talk about me, but i've learned to live with it


Sorry to break it to you Gnash, but actually everyone thinks you are a massive c*** and are all laughing at you, but you carry on regardless.

I don't think he is.

I'm also not generally a fan of people being told everyone thinks they're a massive ******, either. Unless they're jackthevillain with his nazi routine.

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: kippaxvilla2 on December 30, 2011, 11:35:56 PM
He has a point and has spotted a flaw in the owners logic.  That doesn't make him a c*** in my opinion.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Percy McCarthy on December 30, 2011, 11:36:34 PM
Oh no, he's back...and he's pissed.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Risso on December 30, 2011, 11:47:31 PM

Heh.  Soz like, but you know how it is. Women want to meet me, men want to be me, and EVERYONE wants to talk about me, but i've learned to live with it


Sorry to break it to you Gnash, but actually everyone thinks you are a massive c*** and are all laughing at you, but you carry on regardless.

I don't think he is.

I'm also not generally a fan of people being told everyone thinks they're a massive c***, either. Unless they're jackthevillain with his nazi routine.



I don't either.  I think Greg's wrong on the Beye thing, and should know when to stop digging when he's looking a bit daft, but generally I don't think he's a million miles off with his views on Villa.  Like Paulie, I also reserve the "massive ******" tag for people who deserve it, like racists and wouldn't use it for someone whose only real "crime" is saying the odd silly thing on here.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: dave.woodhall on December 30, 2011, 11:49:40 PM
Can't disagree with any of what Greg says there.

You mean you agree with the bit where he says we should let Habib Beye go out on loan, then says we should keep him? Or the bit where he says we want to carry on paying his wages so we can't sign anyone else? Or maybe the bit where he says we should pay up the whole of his contract and not be able to use him anymore? Those bits? 
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 30, 2011, 11:54:59 PM
Can't disagree with any of what Greg says there.

You mean you agree with the bit where he says we should let Habib Beye go out on loan, then says we should keep him? Or the bit where he says we want to carry on paying his wages so we can't sign anyone else? Or maybe the bit where he says we should pay up the whole of his contract and not be able to use him anymore? Those bits? 


now now dave . i said we should offer him to a club and pay a percentage of his wages to get him off the books. roughly 70% of his wages left this season. Mentioned nothing about loans as you well know. and i certainly never mentioned loaning him for the honour of doncaster paying 1k a week.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JD on December 30, 2011, 11:56:28 PM
Can't disagree with any of what Greg says there.

You mean you agree with the bit where he says we should let Habib Beye go out on loan, then says we should keep him? Or the bit where he says we want to carry on paying his wages so we can't sign anyone else? Or maybe the bit where he says we should pay up the whole of his contract and not be able to use him anymore? Those bits? 


now now dave . i said we should offer him to a club and pay a percentage of his wages to get him off the books. roughly 70% of his wages left this season. Mentioned nothing about loans as you well know. and i certainly never mentioned loaning him for the honour of doncaster paying 1k a week.

Hush now Bunny, it's past your bedtime.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: dave.woodhall on December 30, 2011, 11:58:07 PM
Can't disagree with any of what Greg says there.

You mean you agree with the bit where he says we should let Habib Beye go out on loan, then says we should keep him? Or the bit where he says we want to carry on paying his wages so we can't sign anyone else? Or maybe the bit where he says we should pay up the whole of his contract and not be able to use him anymore? Those bits? 


now now dave . i said we should offer him to a club and pay a percentage of his wages to get him off the books. roughly 70% of his wages left this season. Mentioned nothing about loans as you well know. and i certainly never mentioned loaning him for the honour of doncaster paying 1k a week.

Once he goes we can't pay any of his wages because - guess what? He won't be a Villa player anymore. The only way you can pay a player's wages is while he's under contract to you.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: kippaxvilla2 on December 31, 2011, 12:00:27 AM
Though he may be going about getting his points across in an awkward manner, isn't the general gist of what he is saying that cutting your losses on the likes of Beye is a better way of cutting the wage bill than choosing to sell the clubs prized assets?

And while we're about it, someone has called another poster a c*** and worse tried to make out that every other poster supports the viewpoint.  I assume that poster will be made to apologise for this personal offence.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dave on December 31, 2011, 12:02:33 AM
Though he may be going about getting his points across in an awkward manner, isn't the general gist of what he is saying that cutting your losses on the likes of Beye is a better way of cutting the wage bill than choosing to sell the clubs prized assets?
He's saying that we should actively go out of our way to make sure that Beye costs us more money than he needs to.

I wouldn't call that a good idea.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dave Cooper please on December 31, 2011, 12:05:31 AM
Sorry Greg, I've read it back and it just looks bad, it was meant to be a light hearted dig (I'm ex-Army, calling people ****** is part of the banter), I think you took it better than the Mods and others, but it was wrong and I apologise.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 31, 2011, 12:06:28 AM
Can't disagree with any of what Greg says there.

You mean you agree with the bit where he says we should let Habib Beye go out on loan, then says we should keep him? Or the bit where he says we want to carry on paying his wages so we can't sign anyone else? Or maybe the bit where he says we should pay up the whole of his contract and not be able to use him anymore? Those bits? 


now now dave . i said we should offer him to a club and pay a percentage of his wages to get him off the books. roughly 70% of his wages left this season. Mentioned nothing about loans as you well know. and i certainly never mentioned loaning him for the honour of doncaster paying 1k a week.

Hush now Bunny, it's past your bedtime.


sorry, but i have no idea who you are. Are you new?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on December 31, 2011, 12:07:16 AM
Sorry Greg, I've read it back and it just looks bad, it was meant to be a light hearted dig (I'm ex-Army, calling people c***s is part of the banter), I think you took it better than the Mods and others, but it was wrong and I apologise.


its fine. no offence taken and all that....
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: kippaxvilla2 on December 31, 2011, 12:08:06 AM
So that's four moderators that have posted since the 'massive c*** post and not one request to withdraw it.

On the main point,  I take it to mean that getting Beye off the books at almost any cost bottom line removes approximately 2m off the wage bill without looking to cash in on prized assets.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on December 31, 2011, 12:09:12 AM
So that's four moderators that have posted since the 'massive c*** post and not one request to withdraw it.

I thought I made it quite clear that it's not on, but apologise if it should have been made clearer.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: kippaxvilla2 on December 31, 2011, 12:11:41 AM
Dave's post crossed with mine so that's an end to it.  Apologies for me being on the high horse.  I am still smarting from my ban nearly 4 years ago!

I still think he has a good general point about how the wage bill is being reduced however.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Davey B on December 31, 2011, 12:14:59 AM
Just read on our forum that Man Utd's Macheda is supposedly going to QPR on loan. May take one of the clubs apparently in for Bent out of the equasion! 
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JUAN PABLO on December 31, 2011, 12:21:13 AM
Beye , you are the c**t  , making people fall out on here because of you .  AND the t**t that bought you . 

Habib Beye . Why oh why ..  * shakes head *
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: hawkeye on December 31, 2011, 12:22:32 AM
Sorry Greg, I've read it back and it just looks bad, it was meant to be a light hearted dig (I'm ex-Army, calling people c***s is part of the banter), I think you took it better than the Mods and others, but it was wrong and I apologise.
Good on yer mate
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on December 31, 2011, 02:01:56 AM
Just read on our forum that Man Utd's Macheda is supposedly going to QPR on loan. May take one of the clubs apparently in for Bent out of the equasion! 

Are you excited about the 30th of Jan?


Newcastle are being linked with a 5 million deal for Collins.... yes please! Wonder if AM will attempt to get Guthrie in that deal if he can.

I do hope Montgomerie has been out and about scouting though, he has a decent record in the past turning players up, so I am hoping we are not limited to the British market this winter.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Somniloquism on December 31, 2011, 02:21:58 AM
On the main point,  I take it to mean that getting Beye off the books at almost any cost bottom line removes approximately 2m off the wage bill without looking to cash in on prized assets.

No it doesn't as the £2mil will have to be paid off either in one bulk sum or over the course of the rest of his contract. So we would not be saving anything either way, but we are currently paying less as he is on loan with a small percentage being paid for by Donny. And as Dave W pointed out, if we have an injury to Cueller and Hutton we will still have a Beye to call back who might even have some match sharpness back after playing in competitive games.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Clampy on December 31, 2011, 10:40:30 AM
An I the only person that things Herd is better than Clark in midfield?

I think they're both ok in there but if was picking one or the other, it would be Clark and Herd would be at right back.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: toplad4u on December 31, 2011, 10:44:24 AM
On the main point,  I take it to mean that getting Beye off the books at almost any cost bottom line removes approximately 2m off the wage bill without looking to cash in on prized assets.

No it doesn't as the £2mil will have to be paid off either in one bulk sum or over the course of the rest of his contract. So we would not be saving anything either way, but we are currently paying less as he is on loan with a small percentage being paid for by Donny. And as Dave W pointed out, if we have an injury to Cueller and Hutton we will still have a Beye to call back who might even have some match sharpness back after playing in competitive games.

expensive insurance policy!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Chris Smith on December 31, 2011, 11:02:49 AM
Old Greg started this off by saying that reducing the wage bill was a smokescreen, that the club just didn't want to spend money on players. Why they want to save on transfers but not on wages he is yet to explain but I'm sure he'll invent another stupid theory in due course.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Chris Smith on December 31, 2011, 11:04:04 AM
So that's four moderators that have posted since the 'massive c*** post and not one request to withdraw it.


Dave's apologised, Greg's accepted it so why are you trying to stir things up?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: bertlambshank on December 31, 2011, 11:13:52 AM
If and it is money is limited then we should go out and take that winger off Small Heath ~ Redmond or Mutch the one who played in Europe the other week.  Looks like a young well Ashley Young.
12 million no chance.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: kippaxvilla2 on December 31, 2011, 11:24:36 AM
Why don't you try reading all the posts Chris.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: spangley1812 on December 31, 2011, 11:35:22 AM
If and it is money is limited then we should go out and take that winger off Small Heath ~ Redmond or Mutch the one who played in Europe the other week.  Looks like a young well Ashley Young.
12 million no chance.

Nathan Redmond will go for £3/£4m up front with adds on for games/goals/england caps,etc if Blues have any sense (which I doubt)
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: olaftab on December 31, 2011, 11:41:44 AM
So that's four moderators that have posted since the 'massive c*** post and not one request to withdraw it.

I thought I made it quite clear that it's not on, but apologise if it should have been made clearer.

However may I point out that "massive" in teenage speak is extra extra good.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: kippaxvilla2 on December 31, 2011, 11:41:52 AM
Blues are up shit creek financially. No way will he be anywhere near 12m especially when you consider that Johnson reportedly left for 5m in the summer. 
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: olaftab on December 31, 2011, 11:46:02 AM
Why don't you try reading all the posts Chris.

Nooooooooooooo. If Chris does that than he will disagree with all of them and  we will never catch up with his capacity to argue :o
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: bertlambshank on December 31, 2011, 11:55:49 AM
Blues are up shit creek financially. No way will he be anywhere near 12m especially when you consider that Johnson reportedly left for 5m in the summer. 
Man Shitty have been told 12 million.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Chris Smith on December 31, 2011, 12:02:09 PM
Why don't you try reading all the posts Chris.

Fair enough, sorry, I just responded as I was reading through.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Chris Smith on December 31, 2011, 12:03:09 PM
Why don't you try reading all the posts Chris.

Nooooooooooooo. If Chris does that than he will disagree with all of them and  we will never catch up with his capacity to argue :o

Yes you will.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mister E on December 31, 2011, 12:10:39 PM
If and it is money is limited then we should go out and take that winger off Small Heath ~ Redmond or Mutch the one who played in Europe the other week.  Looks like a young well Ashley Young.
12 million no chance.

Nathan Redmond will go for £3/£4m up front with adds on for games/goals/england caps,etc if Blues have any sense (which I doubt)
Well, the club should be interested in a deal like that (if it is on the table) since the kid has high sell-on potential.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: FatSam on December 31, 2011, 12:15:25 PM
Okonkwo on trials at Aston Villa (http://www.tribune.com.ng/index.php/sports/33503-okonkwo-on-trials-at-aston-villa)

from the Nigerian Tribune:

NIGERIA international defender Chibuzor Okonkwo is currently undergoing trials at English Premier League club Aston Villa, officials have disclosed.

According to an official statement by the media officer of the Super Eagles, Ben Alaiya, the Heartland right full back has been released by coach Stephen Keshi to attend the Aston Villa trials.

The 23-year-old defender has established himself as top choice right back for the Super Eagles this outgoing year.

The former Bayelsa United star is solid defensively, loves to join the attack and packs a good shot.

He only recently boasted that he is Nigeria’s best right back.

He has fully recovered from a thigh injury which stopped him from featuring for Heartland in the final of this year’s Federation cup in September.

He has already undergone trials in France, Turkey and Ukraine.

 
According to Wikipedia he is a 23 year old defender with 4 international caps. Good to have him on trial and potentially agree a deal before the African Nations Cup, when he would get more exposure.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: D.boy on December 31, 2011, 05:53:40 PM
Having seen Bents reaction to his goal I don't believe he is going anywhere in January.
I don't want to see Ireland leave either as we may just start seeing the best of him if he can stay injury free and gets a run in the team.
I wouldn't mind if Heskey & Beye go but dont want to see Carlos leave either. The team we have seen at Chelsea should be given a chance now.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on December 31, 2011, 05:58:56 PM
Apparently Kevin Davies was, along with Cahill, giving the Bolton fans the "goodbye routine" today.

I would not be remotely surprised to see him wash up at MON's Project Barcelona soon.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: kippaxvilla2 on December 31, 2011, 06:29:37 PM
Davies and Heskey in a dream ticket partnership at Sunderland.  Make it happen.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: D.boy on December 31, 2011, 06:52:29 PM

Just on Twitter.....

MatKendrickMat Kendrick
Alex McLeish is getting increasingly irritated at being asked about @DarrenBent future. It is safe to say Bent WON'T BE SOLD IN JANUARY
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Ian. on December 31, 2011, 06:56:28 PM
Davies and Heskey in a dream ticket partnership at Sunderland.  Make it happen.
Yes, and even better would be if MON threw a lot of money at it, again.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Davey B on December 31, 2011, 07:39:55 PM
Davies and Heskey in a dream ticket partnership at Sunderland.  Make it happen.

 ;D  Not gonna happen marra!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithesShin on December 31, 2011, 07:45:09 PM
Davies and Heskey in a dream ticket partnership at Sunderland.  Make it happen.

 ;D  Not gonna happen marra!

We thought the same Davey!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Davey B on December 31, 2011, 07:59:13 PM
Davies and Heskey in a dream ticket partnership at Sunderland.  Make it happen.

 ;D  Not gonna happen marra!

We thought the same Davey!

 :(  i have faith ....... it won't happen!  :-\
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Louzie0 on December 31, 2011, 08:41:43 PM
Davies and Heskey in a dream ticket partnership at Sunderland.  Make it happen.

 ;D  Not gonna happen marra!

We thought the same Davey!

 :(  i have faith ....... it won't happen!  :-\


But then again...if you've been imbibing from the famed Northeastern pipes...here's a hint that it could happen, just slipped past you guys whilst you're in a 'marra' whirl!

Found this on Wiki so it must be true. (googled shisha!)

'The tobacco smoked is referred to as Mu'assel, or "Shisha". Multiple references have .... use in Persia, to India. The hookah pipe is also known as the Marra pipe in the UK, especially in the North East, where it is used for recreational purposes. ...'
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithesShin on December 31, 2011, 08:44:47 PM
Davies and Heskey in a dream ticket partnership at Sunderland.  Make it happen.

 ;D  Not gonna happen marra!

We thought the same Davey!

 :(  i have faith ....... it won't happen!  :-\

We needed a striker when MON arrived, we got Marlon Harewood. It can happen!

Happy New Year Davey  ;D
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: dave.woodhall on December 31, 2011, 08:49:17 PM
Davies and Heskey in a dream ticket partnership at Sunderland.  Make it happen.

 ;D  Not gonna happen marra!

We thought the same Davey!

 :(  i have faith ....... it won't happen!  :-\

Today is our perfect day. You'll have signed Heskey by midnight.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: kippaxvilla2 on December 31, 2011, 09:33:35 PM
Davies and Heskey in a dream ticket partnership at Sunderland.  Make it happen.

 ;D  Not gonna happen marra!

We thought the same Davey!

 :(  i have faith ....... it won't happen!  :-\

Today is our perfect day. You'll have signed Heskey by midnight.

I see Steve Walford was at Blues today, according to reports he was watching Curtis Davies.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Davey B on December 31, 2011, 10:20:47 PM
Davies and Heskey in a dream ticket partnership at Sunderland.  Make it happen.

 ;D  Not gonna happen marra!

We thought the same Davey!

 :(  i have faith ....... it won't happen!  :-\


But then again...if you've been imbibing from the famed Northeastern pipes...here's a hint that it could happen, just slipped past you guys whilst you're in a 'marra' whirl!

Found this on Wiki so it must be true. (googled shisha!)

'The tobacco smoked is referred to as Mu'assel, or "Shisha". Multiple references have .... use in Persia, to India. The hookah pipe is also known as the Marra pipe in the UK, especially in the North East, where it is used for recreational purposes. ...'

pmsl! Good one, marra! ........ (Marra is a north east term for friend!)
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Davey B on December 31, 2011, 10:21:51 PM
Davies and Heskey in a dream ticket partnership at Sunderland.  Make it happen.

 ;D  Not gonna happen marra!

We thought the same Davey!

 :(  i have faith ....... it won't happen!  :-\

We needed a striker when MON arrived, we got Marlon Harewood. It can happen!

Happy New Year Davey  ;D

Pete man, we've already got Nikl-arse Bendtner!  ;D 

..... AND A HAPPY NEW YEAR TO YOU ASWELL!  :D
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Davey B on December 31, 2011, 10:24:14 PM
Davies and Heskey in a dream ticket partnership at Sunderland.  Make it happen.

 ;D  Not gonna happen marra!

We thought the same Davey!

 :(  i have faith ....... it won't happen!  :-\

Today is our perfect day. You'll have signed Heskey by midnight.

Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!  ;D
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Davey B on December 31, 2011, 10:25:30 PM
Davies and Heskey in a dream ticket partnership at Sunderland.  Make it happen.

 ;D  Not gonna happen marra!

We thought the same Davey!

 :(  i have faith ....... it won't happen!  :-\

Today is our perfect day. You'll have signed Heskey by midnight.

I see Steve Walford was at Blues today, according to reports he was watching Curtis Davies.

MON has said we are looking for a defender!  :-\
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on December 31, 2011, 10:28:19 PM
He is good once in a while, and totally shit for the rest of the time, even describing himself as little better than a pub player. Seemed to excel with an organiser and leader alongside him, but thinks he is better than he is, and gets carried away.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Somniloquism on December 31, 2011, 10:34:58 PM
On the main point,  I take it to mean that getting Beye off the books at almost any cost bottom line removes approximately 2m off the wage bill without looking to cash in on prized assets.

No it doesn't as the £2mil will have to be paid off either in one bulk sum or over the course of the rest of his contract. So we would not be saving anything either way, but we are currently paying less as he is on loan with a small percentage being paid for by Donny. And as Dave W pointed out, if we have an injury to Cueller and Hutton we will still have a Beye to call back who might even have some match sharpness back after playing in competitive games.

expensive insurance policy!

We have to pay the same money whether we release him now or have him playing here for the next 6 months. So paying possibly less for those 6 months is the next best thing with the ability to have him for emergency cover if needed.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: dave.woodhall on December 31, 2011, 10:37:21 PM
It's not just emergency cover. When we have a reserve game on a bumpy pitch in February I'd rather he was playing than someone we'd miss if they were injured.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on December 31, 2011, 11:15:11 PM
Davey, Curtus Davis is fucking terrible.

I'd never thought a professional footballer could be so easily terrified by the concept of the ball coming near him.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TheSandman on December 31, 2011, 11:16:46 PM
Every time I hear his name I think of that sliced clearance against Rapid Vienna. 
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: D.boy on December 31, 2011, 11:18:04 PM
I was just thinking the same thing, (shudders)
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Davey B on December 31, 2011, 11:21:33 PM
Davey, Curtus Davis is fucking terrible.

I'd never thought a professional footballer could be so easily terrified by the concept of the ball coming near him.

 :(  Nightmare, i hope its not him that we are looking at as cover then!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: dave.woodhall on December 31, 2011, 11:23:02 PM
Davey, Curtus Davis is fucking terrible.

I'd never thought a professional footballer could be so easily terrified by the concept of the ball coming near him.

 :(  Nightmare, i hope its not him that we are looking at as cover then!

There's a good player somewhere in there but that pub player quote will always haunt him.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TheSandman on December 31, 2011, 11:25:54 PM
He was very good when he was next to Laursen though I don't know if Sunderland have a Laursen at the back. I dare say I doubt MoN would seriously be looking at him after how Davies reacted when MoN left.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on December 31, 2011, 11:28:07 PM
Every time I hear his name I think of that sliced clearance against Rapid Vienna. 

I remember that home match when he saw a ball lumped from at least 50 yards away into the sky coming down towards him, in at least 20 yards of free space, unmolested by the opposition, and him looking up and concentrating really, really hard so he'd manage to control the situation, and the ball landing about 20 yards behind him as he stood there looking bewildered, thinking it was still in the air.

To think O'Neill spent nine million of your British pounds on that hopeless pub player.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Davey B on December 31, 2011, 11:34:27 PM
Every time I hear his name I think of that sliced clearance against Rapid Vienna. 

I remember that home match when he saw a ball lumped from at least 50 yards away into the sky coming down towards him, in at least 20 yards of free space, unmolested by the opposition, and him looking up and concentrating really, really hard so he'd manage to control the situation, and the ball landing about 20 yards behind him as he stood there looking bewildered, thinking it was still in the air.

To think O'Neill spent nine million of your British pounds on that hopeless pub player.

To be fair, i used to see him on MOTD / Sky games when he was just starting out at WBA. He looked pretty solid for them!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: djtbc on December 31, 2011, 11:42:59 PM
They'll be after Redmond surely? Similarities with his Ashley Young signing for us.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Davey B on December 31, 2011, 11:47:50 PM
They'll be after Redmond surely? Similarities with his Ashley Young signing for us.



Ssssssshhhhhhh man, you'll alert everyone else!  ;D

I hope you are right, but MON has said we need defensive cover! Could be a smokescreen, but being us, I have a gut-feeling Curtis is the more likely target!  :-[
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on December 31, 2011, 11:48:49 PM
You have to think MON will fancy Redmond. One player I would like from Blues that. Unless................


Zigic!!!!!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Davey B on December 31, 2011, 11:58:29 PM
You have to think MON will fancy Redmond. One player I would like from Blues that. Unless................


Zigic!!!!!


He wants a target man aswell. And apparently money is tight up here now! Could be right aswell Ozzjim!  :-\
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Somniloquism on December 31, 2011, 11:59:08 PM
Every time I hear his name I think of that sliced clearance against Rapid Vienna. 

I think that was the time when I realised there was no hope for him. Before then I was willing to believe it was partly down to his injury issues and just a lack of confidence that a run of games with Dunne would break.

For Davey's benefit the incident happened like this. Villa had just took the lead in the second leg of the tie and overall and the ball came to Davies 10 yards in our half 2 yards from the byline, facing our goal with an attacker coming towards him from our goal. Instead of turning away from him and playing the ball upfield, playing the ball inside to someone, or just knocking it out for a throw in a very safe area, he decides to hoof it against the incoming attacker to get a throw in. He totally misses the guy with the ball and it sails over our bar for a corner. They then score from this corner to take the lead overall on away goals.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Davey B on January 01, 2012, 12:03:24 AM
Every time I hear his name I think of that sliced clearance against Rapid Vienna. 

I think that was the time when I realised there was no hope for him. Before then I was willing to believe it was partly down to his injury issues and just a lack of confidence that a run of games with Dunne would break.

For Davey's benefit the incident happened like this. Villa had just took the lead in the second leg of the tie and overall and the ball came to Davies 10 yards in our half 2 yards from the byline, facing our goal with an attacker coming towards him from our goal. Instead of turning away from him and playing the ball upfield, playing the ball inside to someone, or just knocking it out for a throw in a very safe area, he decides to hoof it against the incoming attacker to get a throw in. He totally misses the guy with the ball and it sails over our bar for a corner. They then score from this corner to take the lead overall on away goals.


 :(  Not good!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 01, 2012, 12:59:16 AM
Davey, we were linked with and reportedly scouted Zigic time and again when he was here, and I am sure he claimed to have never heard of him at one point, although clearly he had, but just did not acknowledge that any player existed outside of the UK unless he inherited them.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Davey B on January 01, 2012, 01:23:03 AM
Davey, we were linked with and reportedly scouted Zigic time and again when he was here, and I am sure he claimed to have never heard of him at one point, although clearly he had, but just did not acknowledge that any player existed outside of the UK unless he inherited them.

Well, the window is open now, so we'll find out who we are or are not going to get! Don't know a lot about Zigic to be honest, other than he's a big target man type! Been reading some links from facebook, etc, and the amount of different names we are linked with is bordering on ridiculous. For us having "not much in the kitty!" we are in for a lot of players, lol! Apparently you guys are interested in taking Craig Gardner back now aswell! Think most of it is the newspapers typing tripe to try and sell their product!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JJ-AV on January 01, 2012, 02:17:25 AM
If Bent goes - Samba, Diame and Steven Fletcher with the money would be great.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on January 01, 2012, 02:21:42 AM
Bent hopefully isn't going and it wouldn't be great if he did under any circumstances I can realistically envisage.

For fucks sake, I've only be wishing him to Villa for the last 7 or 8 years or something. I hope he retires at Villa.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Steve R on January 01, 2012, 02:49:59 AM
.....
Well, the window is open now, so we'll find out who we are or are not going to get! ..

If O'Neil sticks to type, you'll know who's departing soon enough but it will be Jan 29th before he starts making tentative enquiries for replacements.

You'll be so relieved that Connor Wickham will not need to play right back anymore that you'll overlook the fact that by putting the club between a rock and a hard place under time pressure, said replacements will be overpriced and underskilled.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JD on January 01, 2012, 02:52:16 AM
Agree Maz, we've been crying out for a goal poacher for a long time. We better not sell Bent it would be madness. 
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 01, 2012, 11:37:23 AM
Bent hopefully isn't going and it wouldn't be great if he did under any circumstances I can realistically envisage.

For fucks sake, I've only be wishing him to Villa for the last 7 or 8 years or something. I hope he retires at Villa.

Agree totally. Those saying cash in are barking IMO.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 01, 2012, 12:54:54 PM
We should not sell Bent under any circumstances, at the very minimum I want to see him see out his contract. He is a massive massive asset that other clubs would love to have.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Witton Warrior on January 01, 2012, 12:55:49 PM
Agree Maz, we've been crying out for a goal poacher for a long time. We better not sell Bent it would be madness. 

There was a long discussion about how he would suit Liverpool on 5Live last night and the pundits all seemed "in the know" - Is this a case of Bent being tapped-up by proxy?

Hope he stays but money talks loudly at Villa Park these days.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 01, 2012, 01:00:30 PM
If we sell Bent it'll really undermine the slight sense of increased optimism brought on by the last few performances, it would be utter madness.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Karl Bridges on January 01, 2012, 01:07:30 PM
Starting price would not be less than the price of a Carroll. I'd rather keep him though.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: willywombat on January 01, 2012, 01:11:00 PM
Bent did spend an inordinate ammount of time patting his badge after scoring yesterday so I reckon we can safely assume he'll be signing for the bindippers next week :)
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: kippaxvilla2 on January 01, 2012, 01:15:52 PM
If Bent goes I really will give up on football coz what would be the point just as we finally seemed to have found a balanced team capable hurting the opposition.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 01, 2012, 01:26:17 PM
If they are in for him, and there appears more and more rumour, then 30 million should be the bottom price. He has done nothing but enhance his reputation, and we paid 24 with add ons, so should be looking at a profit.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Ads on January 01, 2012, 01:29:48 PM
The rumour is coming from the imagination of some Dippers. I've read a People article which main focus for why "Liverpool were swooping" was Bent's body language prior to coming on.

Get to fuck.

That hack was actually paid to write such shite.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Graydondaze on January 01, 2012, 01:33:33 PM
Talk of selling Bent already is ludicrous, we have only just bought him!!!  Then what, another 10 years of no Villa player getting to 20 in a season.?
We have sold Barry,Milner,Young and Downing recently...where is it going to stop? We have the nucleus of a decent team right now but getting rid of our best goal poacher in decades and the Premiership would become totally meaningless for me.I mean ,whats the point?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: UK Redsox on January 01, 2012, 01:43:13 PM
If they are in for him, and there appears more and more rumour, then 30 million should be the bottom price. He has done nothing but enhance his reputation, and we paid 24 with add ons, so should be looking at a profit.

If Liverpool were to offer 30m plus Andy Carroll, that would be the only scenario worth considering.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: eastie on January 01, 2012, 01:46:24 PM
If mcleish was guaranteed £20m to spend from the sale of bent then maybe it would be something to consider , we have played very well without darren in recent games and if his loss meant the addition of 3 quality signings then maybe it could be possible.

If however the whole amount wasnt to be reinvested on players then certainly i would not consider selling-it depends the sort of new signings alex would bring in with that kind of money , i remember after the sale of platt big ron spent wisely and improved the team with the money , whether alex would do so im not so sure?
Title: Re: Transfer
Post by: Ryu on January 01, 2012, 01:46:43 PM
The Hare is going back to Forest.

The owl flies at midnight.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SoccerHQ on January 01, 2012, 01:58:26 PM
Every time I hear his name I think of that sliced clearance against Rapid Vienna. 

I remember that home match when he saw a ball lumped from at least 50 yards away into the sky coming down towards him, in at least 20 yards of free space, unmolested by the opposition, and him looking up and concentrating really, really hard so he'd manage to control the situation, and the ball landing about 20 yards behind him as he stood there looking bewildered, thinking it was still in the air.

To think O'Neill spent nine million of your British pounds on that hopeless pub player.

To be fair, i used to see him on MOTD / Sky games when he was just starting out at WBA. He looked pretty solid for them!

Maybe but most of that was championship, he only played one season for them in the prem so utterly ridiculous we paid 10m for him.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 01, 2012, 02:01:03 PM
How much did we pay for Ash and how long had he played in the top flight for? Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Karl Bridges on January 01, 2012, 02:07:17 PM
This is from Life's a Pitch

Quote
As the net curtain on the transfer window starts seriously twitching, most of the talk turns to some of the hottest properties on the planet. Yet the wise man will often look to the lower leagues for decent business. Mike Calvin discusses the worth of Barnsley’s captain marvel, Jacob Butterfield.

“Jacob Barnsley is Barnsley captain – not bad for 21,” begins Mike. “I don’t think he’ll be there too much longer.”

“He’s a goalscoring midfield playmaker, and he’s excellent from set pieces. Expect him to move in January – I know Aston Villa are interested.”

A hunch suggests that he could plug a Stephen Ireland-shaped hole.

I also read that Norwich wanted Delfouneso on loan for the second half of the season, I think that would be worth doing.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: LeeB on January 01, 2012, 02:12:11 PM
This is from Life's a Pitch

Quote
As the net curtain on the transfer window starts seriously twitching, most of the talk turns to some of the hottest properties on the planet. Yet the wise man will often look to the lower leagues for decent business. Mike Calvin discusses the worth of Barnsley’s captain marvel, Jacob Butterfield.

“Jacob Barnsley is Barnsley captain – not bad for 21,” begins Mike. “I don’t think he’ll be there too much longer.”

“He’s a goalscoring midfield playmaker, and he’s excellent from set pieces. Expect him to move in January – I know Aston Villa are interested.”

A hunch suggests that he could plug a Stephen Ireland-shaped hole.

I also read that Norwich wanted Delfouneso on loan for the second half of the season, I think that would be worth doing.

Both would be good business. McCleish it seems has an eye for talent outside the obvious, and buying cheap, developing and then selling high is absolutely the right way to develop the club and get us back challenging.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: olaftab on January 01, 2012, 02:15:28 PM
Can't see any logical reason for us to sell Bent . He is under contract and this is where he stays. Time to send a message out.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mister E on January 01, 2012, 02:16:21 PM
This is from Life's a Pitch

Quote
As the net curtain on the transfer window starts seriously twitching, most of the talk turns to some of the hottest properties on the planet. Yet the wise man will often look to the lower leagues for decent business. Mike Calvin discusses the worth of Barnsley’s captain marvel, Jacob Butterfield.

“Jacob Barnsley is Barnsley captain – not bad for 21,” begins Mike. “I don’t think he’ll be there too much longer.”

“He’s a goalscoring midfield playmaker, and he’s excellent from set pieces. Expect him to move in January – I know Aston Villa are interested.”

A hunch suggests that he could plug a Stephen Ireland-shaped hole.

I also read that Norwich wanted Delfouneso on loan for the second half of the season, I think that would be worth doing.
That would work for me on both counts.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mister E on January 01, 2012, 02:18:34 PM
The only way that we could possible countenance a Bent sale would be if the purchaser were to pay at least £30m AND take Heskey and Beye off our hands.

We'd be mad to sell Bent; but I wouldn't be entirely surprised if he went.

Whoo would we buy to replace him? No one obvious springs to mind.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JJ-AV on January 01, 2012, 02:19:38 PM
Yeah, Delfouneso needs a proper loan spell - so we can find out how good he is.

It'll enable us to get a bigger fee for him too.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SoccerHQ on January 01, 2012, 02:21:19 PM
I'd rather send out Delph on loan.

Not sure if the Fonz would play every week at Norwich, they have loads of strikers.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: olaftab on January 01, 2012, 02:33:23 PM
The rumour is coming from the imagination of some Dippers. I've read a People article which main focus for why "Liverpool were swooping" was Bent's body language prior to coming on.

Get to fuck.

That hack was actually paid to write such shite.
his comment is particularly stupid nonsense:
"Liverpol  who have noted that Bent is failing to reproduce his England form at Villa are weighing up a bid"
This wanker journo is blatantly ignoring the fact that it was his Villa form last season that got Bent into the England team.

And I suggest Livepool should concentrate on getting something useful out of Carroll and provise some education for that   twat Suarez.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 01, 2012, 02:34:10 PM
I think we definitely need to send Delph out on loan, he seems to be completely shot in terms of confidence. He needs the opportunity to build that up again.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: KRS on January 01, 2012, 02:37:18 PM
There is no reason to suggest that Bent will be sold and it would be a massive mistake for the club to even contemplate moving him on. We've needed a natural goal scorer down VP for years now, so to get rid of him would be nothing short of a disgrace.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 01, 2012, 02:41:42 PM
The rumour is coming from the imagination of some Dippers. I've read a People article which main focus for why "Liverpool were swooping" was Bent's body language prior to coming on.

Get to fuck.

That hack was actually paid to write such shite.
his comment is particularly stupid nonsense:
"Liverpol  who have noted that Bent is failing to reproduce his England form at Villa are weighing up a bid"
This wanker journo is blatantly ignoring the fact that it was his Villa form last season that got Bent into the England team.

And I suggest Livepool should concentrate on getting something useful out of Carroll and provise some education for that   twat Suarez.

Yeah, 6 in 15 this season, what a waste of a shirt. I'd much rather have paid twice as much for a bloke who has 4 in 23 in his career at a club.

Anyway. based on what they paid for Carroll surely they've set their own benchmark and will have to offer at least as much for Bent?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: D.boy on January 01, 2012, 02:44:16 PM
I will stick my neck out and say Bent isn't going anywhere in this window.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SoccerHQ on January 01, 2012, 02:50:39 PM
Agreed, he'll stay until the end of the season. Summer might be a different story particularly if he scores some goals at the euros.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 01, 2012, 02:51:48 PM
Agreed, he'll stay until the end of the season. Summer might be a different story particularly if he scores some goals at the euros.

At which point the bidding should start at £30 million.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 01, 2012, 02:55:09 PM
I see absolutely no sense in us selling him at all, but especially not in January. He'll have three years on his deal in the summer, his value won't have decreased at all. It just makes no sense whatsoever.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 01, 2012, 02:57:18 PM
I also don't see any point in signing someone like Gibson, because now Clark has shown his ability in midfield and Gardner has made his first appearance we have enough there. The only point in signing a midfielder would be if they are top class or a really top prospect.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: KRS on January 01, 2012, 03:15:08 PM
I see absolutely no sense in us selling him at all, but especially not in January. He'll have three years on his deal in the summer, his value won't have decreased at all. It just makes no sense whatsoever.
I agree. We should be looking to extend his contract at the right time if anything.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: gervilla on January 01, 2012, 03:21:32 PM
I also don't see any point in signing someone like Gibson, because now Clark has shown his ability in midfield and Gardner has made his first appearance we have enough there. The only point in signing a midfielder would be if they are top class or a really top prospect.

Gibson is far from top class, about as far from it as you can get. He would add nothing to our midfield and hinder the development and progress of our young uns.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 01, 2012, 03:26:36 PM
I also don't see any point in signing someone like Gibson, because now Clark has shown his ability in midfield and Gardner has made his first appearance we have enough there. The only point in signing a midfielder would be if they are top class or a really top prospect.

Gibson is far from top class, about as far from it as you can get. He would add nothing to our midfield and hinder the development and progress of our young uns.

That's exactly my point.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Steve R on January 01, 2012, 03:38:23 PM
We're not going to win the league this season, we seem to have more than enough in the tank to keep clear of relegation. From a footballing point of view we have no reason to sell Bent. We have enough bods in midfield/up front who need game time for us to leave well alone in those areas until Heskey & Beye depart to free up some wagespace.

We should spend the rest of the season giving proper opportunity to Delph, Bannan, Herd, Clark, Gardner, Weimann, Delfouneso and Johnson in between getting something out of Ireland & N'Zogbia and establishing a system that makes best use of Bent.

If we do anything at all in January I'd rather we did something about central defence. I'm not sure Clark's best position is in the back four, I don't see any other emerging players likely to challenge at centre back in the near future. I wouldn't mind seeing Collins depart to finance one or even possibly two deals of one sort or another. If we go for loans, it really needs to be with an option to buy.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TheSandman on January 01, 2012, 03:48:48 PM
That Butterfield seems like an interesting prospect. If we can pursue players like him and the lad Rhodes at Huddersfield who have a great deal of potential I'll be happy.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mister E on January 01, 2012, 03:58:43 PM

If we do anything at all in January I'd rather we did something about central defence.
Agree with your analysis, Steve.
Will Baker and / or Lowry make it at CB?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Tokyo Sexwhale on January 01, 2012, 04:04:08 PM

If we do anything at all in January I'd rather we did something about central defence.
Agree with your analysis, Steve.
Will Baker and / or Lowry make it at CB?

I've had a look at a Millwall messageboard and they seem to rate Lowry very highly and want him signed up.  Which is odd, given that Baker is touted as the better prospect.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on January 01, 2012, 04:08:27 PM
Outside of Bent going all Downing on us and betraying the club and fans, he'll be here for a while in my opinion. The club have stated a need to address the finances. It is not tied to the sale of any one player. We are still a PL club and to stay in the upper reaches of the league with European ambitions we need some top players. What we don't need is average players that are top wages and long deals not contributing. Bent doesn't fall into that category, but we still have a number of aging players who will be released in the next 12 months that will get us back to position that will be financially responsible and manageable.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Tokyo Sexwhale on January 01, 2012, 04:10:05 PM
A list of Premier League "Bosmans":

http://www.goal.com/en/news/1717/editorial/2011/11/07/2746465/premier-league-bosman-list-dimitar-berbatov-didier-drogba

I'd hope we keep Guzan and Cuellar.  Of the rest I'd like us to show an interest in Hoilett, Klasnic and Rodallega.

I'm assuming we won't be looking at the likes of Berbatov and Drogba.

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: citizenDJ on January 01, 2012, 04:25:01 PM
We're not going to win the league this season...

Well, not with that attitude.

;-)
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: WALTERS WARRIORS on January 01, 2012, 05:59:14 PM
Outside of Bent going all Downing on us and betraying the club and fans, he'll be here for a while in my opinion. The club have stated a need to address the finances. It is not tied to the sale of any one player. We are still a PL club and to stay in the upper reaches of the league with European ambitions we need some top players. What we don't need is average players that are top wages and long deals not contributing. Bent doesn't fall into that category, but we still have a number of aging players who will be released in the next 12 months that will get us back to position that will be financially responsible and manageable.

Totally spot on. Gary Gardner, Clarke , Baker , Bannan and others can get some valuable experience this season. When Heskey ,Beye ,Warnock etc are off the wage bill we will be nearly a £1m a month better off .......
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mister E on January 01, 2012, 06:22:32 PM
A list of Premier League "Bosmans":

http://www.goal.com/en/news/1717/editorial/2011/11/07/2746465/premier-league-bosman-list-dimitar-berbatov-didier-drogba (http://www.goal.com/en/news/1717/editorial/2011/11/07/2746465/premier-league-bosman-list-dimitar-berbatov-didier-drogba)

I'd hope we keep Guzan and Cuellar.  Of the rest I'd like us to show an interest in Hoilett, Klasnic and Rodallega.

I'm assuming we won't be looking at the likes of Berbatov and Drogba.


Interesting - thanks for posting. No one on that list really jumps out at me other than Guzan abd Cuellar - Klasnic is 31; probably a little old for now. Rodallega doesn't quite deliver the end product. Hoillett would be good but will go elsewhere probably.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: frankmosswasmyuncle on January 01, 2012, 06:24:59 PM
The Hare is going back to Forest.

The owl flies at midnight.
The Eagle Has Landed
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 01, 2012, 06:27:02 PM

If we do anything at all in January I'd rather we did something about central defence.
Agree with your analysis, Steve.
Will Baker and / or Lowry make it at CB?

I've had a look at a Millwall messageboard and they seem to rate Lowry very highly and want him signed up.  Which is odd, given that Baker is touted as the better prospect.

Maybe Baker's happier playing there and Lowry thinks he's too good for them.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 01, 2012, 06:44:31 PM
A list of Premier League "Bosmans":

http://www.goal.com/en/news/1717/editorial/2011/11/07/2746465/premier-league-bosman-list-dimitar-berbatov-didier-drogba

I'd hope we keep Guzan and Cuellar.  Of the rest I'd like us to show an interest in Hoilett, Klasnic and Rodallega.

I'm assuming we won't be looking at the likes of Berbatov and Drogba.



I'd take a punt on Salgado of Blackburn. He seems a prospect.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Tokyo Sexwhale on January 01, 2012, 07:13:01 PM

If we do anything at all in January I'd rather we did something about central defence.
Agree with your analysis, Steve.
Will Baker and / or Lowry make it at CB?

I've had a look at a Millwall messageboard and they seem to rate Lowry very highly and want him signed up.  Which is odd, given that Baker is touted as the better prospect.

Maybe Baker's happier playing there and Lowry thinks he's too good for them.

Do you mean the other way around?

I'd consider Klasnic as a decent and experienced backup, a replacement for Heskey who can score a few.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Shrek on January 01, 2012, 07:42:58 PM
A list of Premier League "Bosmans":

http://www.goal.com/en/news/1717/editorial/2011/11/07/2746465/premier-league-bosman-list-dimitar-berbatov-didier-drogba

I'd hope we keep Guzan and Cuellar.  Of the rest I'd like us to show an interest in Hoilett, Klasnic and Rodallega.

I'm assuming we won't be looking at the likes of Berbatov and Drogba.



I'd take a punt on Salgado of Blackburn. He seems a prospect.

What the 53 year old spaniard?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: adrenachrome on January 01, 2012, 07:53:43 PM
The Hare is going back to Forest.

The owl flies at midnight.
The Eagle Has Landed
Dinosaur head has decamped.

(http://getnloose.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/harewood_big.jpg)
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Jimmy Smash on January 01, 2012, 08:44:20 PM
What I find most worrying is that our stock as a club seems to have dropped lower than I can ever remember. The anti Villa media and the general shambles of the past 18 months seems to have ensured that we are not a good bet for potential players.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on January 01, 2012, 08:46:00 PM
Berbatov is the class on that list but probably beyond us.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on January 01, 2012, 09:10:12 PM
Berbatov is the class on that list but probably beyond us.


he'll end up back on the continent somewhere. He was linked recently with a move back to his old club in Germany. Players of that ilk and where he is in his career will only play for established CL clubs or those with a bag of dough. Wouldn't shock me to see him at PSG.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Matt C on January 01, 2012, 09:17:28 PM
Or Spurs.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on January 01, 2012, 09:21:59 PM
Berbatov is the class on that list but probably beyond us.


he'll end up back on the continent somewhere. He was linked recently with a move back to his old club in Germany. Players of that ilk and where he is in his career will only play for established CL clubs or those with a bag of dough. Wouldn't shock me to see him at PSG.

Alas, I agree.
As far as strikers are concerned, I'd like to see Bent and Gabby persisted with as the senior pair anyway with anybody else being brought in as a back up.
I think a more convincing "powerhouse striker" than Heskey perhaps.
Or a flair(ish) player like Rodallega.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on January 01, 2012, 10:13:29 PM
Or Spurs.

Been there done that innit? I think he burnt his bridges on the way out if you recall the hideous SKY smothered transfer saga that preceded it.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on January 01, 2012, 10:23:36 PM
Let's keep Rottingham Hotturds out of this.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 01, 2012, 11:07:08 PM

If we do anything at all in January I'd rather we did something about central defence.
Agree with your analysis, Steve.
Will Baker and / or Lowry make it at CB?

I've had a look at a Millwall messageboard and they seem to rate Lowry very highly and want him signed up.  Which is odd, given that Baker is touted as the better prospect.

Maybe Baker's happier playing there and Lowry thinks he's too good for them.

Do you mean the other way around?

I'd consider Klasnic as a decent and experienced backup, a replacement for Heskey who can score a few.

Of course. Sorry.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on January 01, 2012, 11:07:36 PM
What did that fat Welsh ****** just say on MOTD2?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 01, 2012, 11:08:41 PM
What did that fat Welsh c*** just say on MOTD2?

Ruth Jones?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 01, 2012, 11:10:16 PM
What did he say?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: dicedlam on January 01, 2012, 11:10:52 PM
Reckons Bent is on his way.
Top 4 addition.

Arsenal?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: WALTERS WARRIORS on January 01, 2012, 11:11:14 PM
Hartson on MOTD saying Bent would be a massive addition to any of the top 4. No news there then. Oh and we were first on the highlights. Or is that because it was Chelsea !! 
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 01, 2012, 11:14:52 PM
Well he's right that he'd be a good addition for the top 4 lot, but doesn't mean he's going. We paid a lot of money, he hasn't indicated he's remotely unhappy at the club. In fact he's actually indicated that he is happy. So I don't see any reason for us to sell.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Ian. on January 01, 2012, 11:17:35 PM
Don't they all say they are happy though. We know only too well they scoot at the first mention of Manchester, Liverpool etc.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: olaftab on January 01, 2012, 11:18:18 PM
It's good to see that we have the only topic and top target of this transfer window.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 01, 2012, 11:18:32 PM
It smells of inevitability. Barry, Milner, Young, Downing.... Bent. I can't see it being under 30 million plus though.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SashasGrandad on January 01, 2012, 11:18:42 PM
A list of Premier League "Bosmans":

http://www.goal.com/en/news/1717/editorial/2011/11/07/2746465/premier-league-bosman-list-dimitar-berbatov-didier-drogba

I'd hope we keep Guzan and Cuellar.  Of the rest I'd like us to show an interest in Hoilett, Klasnic and Rodallega.

I'm assuming we won't be looking at the likes of Berbatov and Drogba.



I'd take a punt on Salgado of Blackburn. He seems a prospect.

What the 53 year old spaniard?

Salgado is old and crap!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 01, 2012, 11:21:50 PM
A list of Premier League "Bosmans":

http://www.goal.com/en/news/1717/editorial/2011/11/07/2746465/premier-league-bosman-list-dimitar-berbatov-didier-drogba

I'd hope we keep Guzan and Cuellar.  Of the rest I'd like us to show an interest in Hoilett, Klasnic and Rodallega.

I'm assuming we won't be looking at the likes of Berbatov and Drogba.



I'd take a punt on Salgado of Blackburn. He seems a prospect.

What the 53 year old spaniard?

Salgado is old and crap!

Yes.

It's almost as if PWS was joking when he described him as a prospect, innit

*wink*
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 01, 2012, 11:22:16 PM
He's only a youngster. You're all just miffed that you missed such a potential bargain.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 01, 2012, 11:23:30 PM
It smells of inevitability. Barry, Milner, Young, Downing.... Bent. I can't see it being under 30 million plus though.

How is it inevitable? At least two of those were for daft money while the other two had contracts running down.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SashasGrandad on January 01, 2012, 11:24:49 PM
If a top 4 team want Bent - why not look at players falling out with their managers?

Bent 4 Rooney?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 01, 2012, 11:25:08 PM
I'd say the fact that Bent has 3 and a half years on his deal means it certainly isn't inevitable. If we do sell him, the club will have a lot of explaining to do.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 01, 2012, 11:26:03 PM
It smells of inevitability. Barry, Milner, Young, Downing.... Bent. I can't see it being under 30 million plus though.

How is it inevitable? At least two of those were for daft money while the other two had contracts running down.

How does it make any difference if it is daft money, though? They still ended up going.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 01, 2012, 11:28:04 PM
It smells of inevitability. Barry, Milner, Young, Downing.... Bent. I can't see it being under 30 million plus though.

How is it inevitable? At least two of those were for daft money while the other two had contracts running down.

How does it make any difference if it is daft money, though? They still ended up going.

Nobody is going to pay daft money for Bent this month.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Ian. on January 01, 2012, 11:29:44 PM
If Carol is worth 35m What is Bent worth by Daglish's logic? He is a proven goal scorer where Carol was not.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 01, 2012, 11:30:07 PM
It smells of inevitability. Barry, Milner, Young, Downing.... Bent. I can't see it being under 30 million plus though.

How is it inevitable? At least two of those were for daft money while the other two had contracts running down.

How does it make any difference if it is daft money, though? They still ended up going.

Nobody is going to pay daft money for Bent this month.

It depends what the board's idea of daft money is. When McLeish came, he gave that pep talk to supporters representatives and said Downing would only leave for daft money of the 50m variety. He then went for 20m. I can see the same thing happening with Darren Bent.

Chelsea could do with a striker. Torres isn't working, Drogba is finished, and that leaves just Sturridge.

Liverpool could also be interested (and if they are, i hope we don't help them recover from their expensive mistake of shelling out way, way over the top for Carroll).
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 01, 2012, 11:31:18 PM
I see the Mirror have linked us to Robbie Keane, I can't see how that'd ever be true and it better not be.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 01, 2012, 11:32:09 PM
If someone offered 30 million, and lets face it, there are 2 managers with big money that are desperate right now in Villas Boas and the King, he would be gone. I hope I am wrong, but when these things start gathering about our best players, we have an inevitable period and then lose the player. All of the above went after a concerted period of being linked away, the Bent thing has grown over the last month. I would bet a decent amount he won't start next season here.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 01, 2012, 11:33:51 PM
I would be very surprised if he goes this month.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Ian. on January 01, 2012, 11:34:13 PM
I'd take Strurridge plus money from Chelsea but I would rather it was not even a matter of concern and that we could still go for someone like Sturridge as well as having Bent and Gabby.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 01, 2012, 11:36:05 PM
If someone offered 30 million, and lets face it, there are 2 managers with big money that are desperate right now in Villas Boas and the King, he would be gone. I hope I am wrong, but when these things start gathering about our best players, we have an inevitable period and then lose the player. All of the above went after a concerted period of being linked away, the Bent thing has grown over the last month. I would bet a decent amount he won't start next season here.

That is true, and I really hope it doesn't happen. This time there is no excuse for the board to sanction the sale, the player has a long time on his contract and hasn't made noises about moving. I would be very very disappointed if we sold him, it would send a disastrous message out to the fans and all the players at the club. Who would want to be here if it's so obvious we have no ambition to hold onto our best players and progress? We have made big inroads into the wage bill and players like Heskey and Beye should be removed from it in the summer, there is no reason to sell Bent.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TheSandman on January 01, 2012, 11:39:25 PM
He's only a youngster. You're all just miffed that you missed such a potential bargain.

Wasn't he one of Brice Jovial's deranged suggestions? Think it was him and Jimmy Bullard?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: luke25 on January 01, 2012, 11:41:39 PM
I'd be gutted if we sold Bent, I just can't see it, but then again I was convinced we would'nt sell Downing so I suppose if somebody stupid was to offer us twice his worth then he may be off (back handed dig at Liverpool there), we're finally starting to build something again now so just keep hold of everybody unless somebody wants to take Emile of our hands.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 01, 2012, 11:43:50 PM
He's only a youngster. You're all just miffed that you missed such a potential bargain.

Wasn't he one of Brice Jovial's deranged suggestions? Think it was him and Jimmy Bullard?

Finally someone got it.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on January 01, 2012, 11:47:33 PM
If you're going to spend £30m on a striker then the likes of Chelsea will be expecting a bit of "Hollywood" for that kind of money and as much as I rate him that just isn't Bent. And the likes of Colin at QPR chasing Bent is... well, its just a load of bollocks isn't it.

I just can't see Bent leaving yet and believe me it's not because I have the utmost faith in the board. It's because his realistic destinations are limited.
Although annoying, Downing for £20m was good business. Selling Bent for anything less than ludicrous money just isn't. It would be a marketing, PR, commercial and footballing disaster and likely the end of any good relations between Randy and the fanbase.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Shrek on January 01, 2012, 11:50:16 PM
Just to clarify we can only loan one player from the same club.(links with a loan for Pienaar)

And Berbatov has 18 months left as Man U have taken up the extra years option on his deal.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Somniloquism on January 01, 2012, 11:55:53 PM
I would be very surprised if he goes this month.

Ozzjim didn't specify this month though. I assumed he meant the summer as all the other left then.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Matt C on January 01, 2012, 11:58:52 PM
From the ever-reliable Daily Mirror:

Aston Villa boss Alex McLeish is ready to give Robbie Keane a shock return to the Premier League if he can cut through red tape.

The Republic of Ireland star is taking a break at the end of the MLS season with Los Angeles Galaxy, but McLeish would like to take him on loan for a couple of months.

Keane could be open to the plan to keep himself sharp before heading back to California and building up for the Euro 2012 finals with his country.

However Keane would need clearance from both LA Galaxy and the MLS - plus a big insurance payment - to make the move happen, but it is being explored by Villa.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Somniloquism on January 01, 2012, 11:59:03 PM
Just to clarify we can only loan one player from the same club.(links with a loan for Pienaar)

Is Jenas still classed as on loan? Or is that for the same season as most prem loans are season long so us sending Jenas packing to spurs doesn't count.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 02, 2012, 12:03:36 AM
I would straight buy Pienaar. Super player.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 02, 2012, 12:06:17 AM
Just to clarify we can only loan one player from the same club.(links with a loan for Pienaar)

Is Jenas still classed as on loan? Or is that for the same season as most prem loans are season long so us sending Jenas packing to spurs doesn't count.

I suspect we may have had an agreement for the season.

Now he is injured, we're probably still paying his wages, so even if he's back at Spurs getting treatment, he's still officially on loan to us, I imagine.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on January 02, 2012, 12:10:42 AM
I would straight buy Pienaar. Super player.

Couldn't disagree more.

Overrated, ineffective, jack of no trades.
I'd rather not bother and stick with the kids.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 02, 2012, 12:14:40 AM
It would be a no thanks from me regarding both Pienaar and Keane.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on January 02, 2012, 12:14:46 AM
From the ever-reliable Daily Mirror:

Aston Villa boss Alex McLeish is ready to give Robbie Keane a shock return to the Premier League if he can cut through red tape.

The Republic of Ireland star is taking a break at the end of the MLS season with Los Angeles Galaxy, but McLeish would like to take him on loan for a couple of months.

Keane could be open to the plan to keep himself sharp before heading back to California and building up for the Euro 2012 finals with his country.

However Keane would need clearance from both LA Galaxy and the MLS - plus a big insurance payment - to make the move happen, but it is being explored by Villa.

Suggested this the other day and it wouldn't surprise me at all. Send Fonz out on loan and have Robbie Keane around for a bit to give us a spark off the bench. He's proven at PL level, needs to stay sharp ahead of the Euros, has three of his fellow Ireland players at he club, and is a short term commitment. I think it would be a good signing.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Somniloquism on January 02, 2012, 12:19:38 AM
I would straight buy Pienaar. Super player.

Couldn't disagree more.

Overrated, ineffective, jack of no trades.
I'd rather not bother and stick with the kids.

I agree with Maz to some extent but would add he is now injury prone as well. So why get another potential Jenas but this time full time.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: KevinGage on January 02, 2012, 12:23:27 AM
From the ever-reliable Daily Mirror:

Aston Villa boss Alex McLeish is ready to give Robbie Keane a shock return to the Premier League if he can cut through red tape.

The Republic of Ireland star is taking a break at the end of the MLS season with Los Angeles Galaxy, but McLeish would like to take him on loan for a couple of months.

Keane could be open to the plan to keep himself sharp before heading back to California and building up for the Euro 2012 finals with his country.

However Keane would need clearance from both LA Galaxy and the MLS - plus a big insurance payment - to make the move happen, but it is being explored by Villa.

Suggested this the other day and it wouldn't surprise me at all. Send Fonz out on loan and have Robbie Keane around for a bit to give us a spark off the bench. He's proven at PL level, needs to stay sharp ahead of the Euros, has three of his fellow Ireland players at he club, and is a short term commitment. I think it would be a good signing.

I wouldn't particularly want to see it, but I guess it would put an end to the incessant links with him every bastard transfer window.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: brontebilly on January 02, 2012, 12:45:51 AM
I like Pienaar and Keane but they aren't a good fit for us.

4231 will hopefully be our formation going forward. We gave Gabby, Nzogbia and Albrighton for the wide areas. Ireland and Bannan behind the front man. At 29 and after a couple of injury plagued seasons Pienaar is a no for me.

Keane was a disaster for Liverpool in the 4231 formation. He needs to play off someone. With Gabby or Bent to play up there I think we are covered. Not sure Mrs Keane will fancy a stint in a provincial UK city either. Fulham on loan maybe.

With the change of formation I think we are fairly well covered in terms of players. I'd give Cuellar and Petrov another year. We need a bit of stability and both of them are playing well.

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Fernando Partridge on January 02, 2012, 02:01:54 AM
Jacob butterfield keeps being mooted - he of Barnsley. From what have seen I like his play and young up and coming player with quality could be a shrewd signing.
I wonder if Heskey will leave?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Shoody on January 02, 2012, 08:35:39 AM
Some of these links are soul destroying. From Romeu, Cabaye and Nacho to Robbie Keane :(

But the link to Gylfi Sigurdsson in the Mirror was interesting.... but seems to have joined Swansea on loan instead. :(
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mister E on January 02, 2012, 09:24:22 AM
Keane? Pienaar? No thanks. And I'd be surprised if we brought anyone in of significance. Butterfield looks interesting, though, and it'd be good to add to the young MF depth.
Bent? - I don't think he'll go during this window; I don't think anyone is desperate enough to spend what it should take.

But if the buzzards do start circling we'd have to set the price as £30m for the opening bid PLUS the purchaser takes over the contracts for Heskey and Beye! I think that might put most off.

Delfouneso: either loan out or sell.
Delph: definitely a loan-out.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Irish villain on January 02, 2012, 09:34:11 AM
Maybe Keane could do a job from the bench? He still has something to offer, especially when we go on our cup run :-)
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Holte L2 on January 02, 2012, 09:37:47 AM
I really like Charlie Austin at Burnley. I'd offer 4m and Fonz on loan for the season.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JUAN PABLO on January 02, 2012, 10:28:23 AM
We keep getting mentioned with this Willams from Middlesborough . I know nothing about him , can play CB , RB and midfield .
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Clampy on January 02, 2012, 11:06:28 AM
I would straight buy Pienaar. Super player.

Couldn't disagree more.

Overrated, ineffective, jack of no trades.
I'd rather not bother and stick with the kids.

Seconded, he's so overated it's untrue. He's never over impressed me whenever i've seen him. He'll be back at Everton eventually i reckon.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 02, 2012, 12:34:56 PM
Well Mcleish has said 'Yes, I say that now. He won't be leaving.' So hopefully that means Bent will not be going anywhere.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TheSandman on January 02, 2012, 01:14:13 PM
I think it would be for the best that there are no major departures this month unless we get an offer we cannot refuse for Heskey or Beye. I do think we should loan out Delph and The Fonz though. However, we might be better off sending them to a higher championship club than a Premiership one lest we suffer an injury crisis so we can recall them. It's only then that a short term loan for Keane makes sense as he can provide an option from the bench.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: luke25 on January 02, 2012, 01:22:57 PM
Well Mcleish has said 'Yes, I say that now. He won't be leaving.' So hopefully that means Bent will not be going anywhere.
He said that about Downing too, for the record i'm not trying to be a negative ******, I hope and think he'll stay.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: hulkamania on January 02, 2012, 01:29:23 PM
Just read a tweet about Kranjcar being at Villa Park today. Prob bs though
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SoccerHQ on January 02, 2012, 01:36:59 PM
Some journo says it's true.

Bit of a highlights player but can play wide and is creative and scores goals.

Are Spurs cancelling the Jenas loan then and letting us have Niko instead?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: LeeB on January 02, 2012, 01:43:05 PM
Some journo says it's true.

Bit of a highlights player but can play wide and is creative and scores goals.

Are Spurs cancelling the Jenas loan then and letting us have Niko instead?

Would be decent of them.

I've always thought he's a bit one paced, but he can play, and an experienced international who can play anywhere across midfield would be a tidy loan move.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: luke25 on January 02, 2012, 01:47:19 PM
Just read a tweet about Kranjcar being at Villa Park today. Prob bs though

While i'm not his biggest fan, he's technically good and if thats the type of player McLeish wants then it would show he wants to continue playing the football of the past few games which is encouraging.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 02, 2012, 01:47:19 PM
Very decent player, always looked brilliant for Croatia in a centre mid role when I have seen him (all of 3-4 times) but not really done it at Spurs. Would give options though if we are playing 3 in there.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SoccerHQ on January 02, 2012, 01:47:33 PM
I'd rather have a proper technical player like him than utter dross like Keith Andrews or Danny Guthrie in Midfield.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 02, 2012, 01:48:25 PM
I'd definitely take him over some of the players we've been linked with.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 02, 2012, 01:51:22 PM
Just read a tweet about Kranjcar being at Villa Park today. Prob bs though

While i'm not his biggest fan, he's technically good and if thats the type of player McLeish wants then it would show he wants to continue playing the football of the past few games which is encouraging.

Good point. I think Clark and Herd have shown they can hold. Could pave way for Delph loan move somewhere. Wigan would be good.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: maidstonevillain on January 02, 2012, 01:58:10 PM
Some journo says it's true.

Bit of a highlights player but can play wide and is creative and scores goals.

Are Spurs cancelling the Jenas loan then and letting us have Niko instead?

Perhaps its a reward for us doing them a favour at Chelsea.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: KevinGage on January 02, 2012, 02:05:33 PM
With the likes of Ireland and Bannan in the squad, I don't think that's the sort of player we're crying out for, in all honesty.

Bannan has come through the ranks and has an affinity for the place, Ireland finally looks like he has the bit between his teeth.  Both are better options for us than a gun for hire.

I would have said a DM is a priority for us, but with the form of Clark we can maybe hold back on that. I'd be interested in Diame though, if the price reflected his contract status.

Other than that, maybe a targetman, either loan or cutprice. So we can do away with the grim spectacle of Ivanhoe coming off the bench to bless us all with his falling down routine.

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 02, 2012, 02:09:22 PM
With the likes of Ireland and Bannan in the squad, I don't think that's the sort of player we're crying out for, in all honesty.

Bannan has come through the ranks and has an affinity for the place, Ireland finally looks like he has the bit between his teeth.  Both are better options for us than a gun for hire.

I would have said a DM is a priority for us, but with the form of Clark we can maybe hold back on that. I'd be interested in Diame though, if the price reflected his contract status.

Other than that, maybe a targetman, either loan or cutprice. So we can do away with the grim spectacle of Ivanhoe coming off the bench to bless us all with his falling down routine.




I think Diame should be a target, but Wigan won't sell cheap in Jan despite the contract issue, I would simply register interest with his agent and aim to get him on a free in June.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: KevinGage on January 02, 2012, 02:15:10 PM
There might be far more options for him then, in all honesty.

But if - for the sake of argument- Wigan were prepared to do business at the £3/4 million mark, and the player himself didn't take the piss by asking for Beye or NRC style wages, it's one to explore.

He hasn't been a guaranteed first team regular for a struggling side like Wigan these past 18 months, so I'm not sure Wigan can take the piss when it comes to the asking price. Knowing Whelan though, they probably will.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 02, 2012, 02:33:33 PM
I reckon they will want 6 million.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dave on January 02, 2012, 02:41:11 PM
In which case they can take a running jump.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dante Lavelli on January 02, 2012, 03:06:26 PM
In which case they can take a running jump.

Knock off a million or two and they can also have Delph for the rest of the season on loan.  Deal?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dave on January 02, 2012, 03:33:40 PM
In which case they can take a running jump.

Knock off a million or two and they can also have Delph for the rest of the season on loan.  Deal?
Maybe.

I just don't see how he is any better than Herd, Clark or Delph. So we either go big and get someone who is much better, or we stick with what we have there any use the resources available where it's needed more.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SoccerHQ on January 02, 2012, 06:06:10 PM
Stoke are in for Diame. Think he'll end up there, Pulis's type of central midfielder.

Kranjacer can play on the left and cut in a bit, he certainly did that for Pompey and we're not overly blessed with wide players in the squad anymore.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 02, 2012, 06:09:12 PM
So Stoke will have Diame and Palacios. Ouch.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Villanation on January 02, 2012, 07:37:23 PM
Having resorted back to normality today under AM, we have to get into the transfer market and we have to get some quality in, if that means selling player that have to be deemed somewhat surplus or just haven't worked out so be it.

Bent for me would bring a big pay day, Ireland should be got rid of but i doubt there would be any takers, probably we could improve on Dunne, and he would get some attention, its rumoured MON is looking at a couple of Villa players, odds on 1 is Petrov, so be it, problem is the commentator made reference's to the fact that Villa spent big last Jan transfer window with the purchase of Bent and Makoun but then went on to say he doubted that McLiesh would spend on anything other than a bargain, in which case is it worth selling anybody.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Ads on January 02, 2012, 08:27:17 PM
I'd rather have a proper technical player like him than utter dross like Keith Andrews or Danny Guthrie in Midfield.

Agreed, although I would say we also need a nasty hard bastard as well, but there is no reason why said nasty hard bastard cannot play the game too.

Its only by upping the quality that we'll start to look any better. There is only so much any manager can do with the dross we have.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Grande Pablo on January 02, 2012, 09:08:12 PM
And just to top it all Swansea make a cracking loan signing:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2012/jan/02/gylfi-sigurdsson-swansea-hoffenheim
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on January 02, 2012, 09:23:48 PM
For Pienaar see also: Kranjcar. Do not want.

We need a midfield general who will grab a game by the balls, not some jack of no trades who has one decent game in five or more. That isn't Diame either.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ROBBO on January 02, 2012, 09:29:27 PM
Then who Maz?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: villadelph on January 02, 2012, 09:31:49 PM
Having resorted back to normality today under AM, we have to get into the transfer market and we have to get some quality in, if that means selling player that have to be deemed somewhat surplus or just haven't worked out so be it.

Bent for me would bring a big pay day, Ireland should be got rid of but i doubt there would be any takers, probably we could improve on Dunne, and he would get some attention, its rumoured MON is looking at a couple of Villa players, odds on 1 is Petrov, so be it, problem is the commentator made reference's to the fact that Villa spent big last Jan transfer window with the purchase of Bent and Makoun but then went on to say he doubted that McLiesh would spend on anything other than a bargain, in which case is it worth selling anybody.

Sell of Ireland..? Now?

What gives?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on January 02, 2012, 09:37:53 PM
Then who Maz?

Depends how much there is to spend.
Most likely though, Montgommery will have to go and dig one up from Africa or something.
Or get Gardner up to speed Riki Tik!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 02, 2012, 09:46:16 PM
For our midfield depth and to add the goal threat I would take his brother back at the minute in a deal for Collins.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Jimmy Smash on January 02, 2012, 09:48:03 PM
I'd take Ridgewell back at the moment.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Clampy on January 02, 2012, 09:51:48 PM
One thing i would like to see us do is give Carlos another contract.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 02, 2012, 09:53:29 PM
As would I, but we won't.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: villadelph on January 02, 2012, 09:54:45 PM
One thing i would like to see us do is give Carlos another contract.

If we don't I'll be livid. Our only back that can actually pass on the floor to a midfielder.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: James on January 02, 2012, 09:55:18 PM
One thing i would like to see us do is give Carlos another contract.

Agreed. It's bizarre that he's been so under-used, and to get a replacement of his quality would cost us hugely! We could also do something really novel, and play him as a centre half!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TheSandman on January 02, 2012, 09:56:44 PM
One thing i would like to see us do is give Carlos another contract.

Would he sign it? After being used so sparingly he'd probably be keen to chance his arm elsewhere.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: tarzansbrother on January 02, 2012, 09:59:33 PM
Fucking hell. I was depressed after watching that pile of shit today but to read fans saying they would take Craig Gardner and Liam Ridgewell back takes the biscuit. Off to grate my dick against the back garden wall.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: villadelph on January 02, 2012, 10:00:31 PM
Fucking hell. I was depressed after watching that pile of shit today but to read fans saying they would take Craig Gardner and Liam Ridgewell back takes the biscuit. Off to grate my dick against the back garden wall.

Yikes, let us know how that goes..
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Jimmy Smash on January 02, 2012, 10:00:41 PM
Fucking hell. I was depressed after watching that pile of shit today but to read fans saying they would take Craig Gardner and Liam Ridgewell back takes the biscuit. Off to grate my dick against the back garden wall.

I was joking about Ridgewell, just to be clear.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Phil from the upper holte on January 02, 2012, 10:00:50 PM
Keane Ho Ho Ho. Bollocks we've got two good strikers we can't feed why get in another injury prone ******
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: frankmosswasmyuncle on January 02, 2012, 10:02:43 PM
Fucking hell. I was depressed after watching that pile of shit today but to read fans saying they would take Craig Gardner and Liam Ridgewell back takes the biscuit. Off to grate my dick against the back garden wall.
DON'T DO IT!
IT REALLY HURTS!
It's simply a sign of how frustrated we all feel.
(I mean considering signing dicks, not grating them against garden walls!)
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: KevinGage on January 02, 2012, 10:03:01 PM
Jelavic left out of the Rangers side today.

Jelavic and Krankjcar Croatian double deal?
I wonder if they have the same agent...
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Steve kirk on January 02, 2012, 10:03:15 PM
I would take Ridgwell over Warnock in an instant and Gardner for Collins sounds good too.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: villadelph on January 02, 2012, 10:04:21 PM
Jelavic left out of the Rangers side today.

Jelavic and Krankjcar Croatian double deal?
I wonder if they have the same agent...

Why not? It can't get much worse. No one's happy and we're deathly close to the bottom.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 02, 2012, 10:07:17 PM
QPR bid for Jelavic, so it's probably them.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Jimmy Smash on January 02, 2012, 10:07:53 PM
I would take Ridgwell over Warnock in an instant and Gardner for Collins sounds good too.

Gardner for Collins? Are you sure?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: tarzansbrother on January 02, 2012, 10:09:36 PM
Samba would be my choice. Selling Collins for £5m to use towards.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: gervilla on January 02, 2012, 10:10:01 PM
I feel sorry for Carlos. He just can't manage to get a decent run of games together. I hope he will be fit for the Cup game.
If Hutton starts then we are back to having 2 liabilities in the full back positions. Warnock was a disgrace today.
I think it is safe to say that any thoughts I had that we had turned a corner with the last 3 or 4 performances was completely washed down the swanny with that performance today.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: avfcpg on January 02, 2012, 10:13:23 PM
A year or so ago I would have said Krankjcar wasn't good enough for us..sadly, the way things have gone, I'd take him now. Creativity in the middle is just so badly lacking. Ditto for Robbie Keane...he could offer us something we haven't got if he's on a loan deal or a free...Am non plussed about both of them but not many options for us with the likely lack of spending.

Really rate Moses from Wigan but can't see him coming here, same for Diame.

Are we in transition, on the slide, or just treading water & unloading the wage bill before we start again (if we start again)? Hopefully the latter...
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Clampy on January 02, 2012, 10:19:48 PM
I would take Ridgwell over Warnock in an instant and Gardner for Collins sounds good too.

Gardner for Collins? Are you sure?

Not sure about that myself, but after watching Warnock today, Ridgewell would'nt be any worse.

One left back i do like whenever i've seen him is Southampton's Dan Harding.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TaxDodger on January 02, 2012, 10:23:37 PM
If we need a left back can we not try and sign Wayne Bridge again? I know we could never afford what he's currently on, but he does seem pretty desperate to play first team football so perhaps he'd be willing to take a significant paycut.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Jimmy Smash on January 02, 2012, 10:26:38 PM
Interestingly I saw something on the BBC website this morning saying that Villa only ship an average of 1.1 goals per game when Collins is playing, and when he's not it's over 2.0. I don't know if that is calculated over the season so far or a Villa career average.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: gervilla on January 02, 2012, 10:30:20 PM
If we need a left back can we not try and sign Wayne Bridge again? I know we could never afford what he's currently on, but he does seem pretty desperate to play first team football so perhaps he'd be willing to take a significant paycut.

Wayne Bridge wouldn't be in improvement on Warnock IMHO.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Steve kirk on January 02, 2012, 10:37:22 PM
Ridgewell bought as replacement for Warnock who is banished to the reserves , Gardner for Collins ( straight swap), purchase another Centre back, Cuellar stays right back.Sorted  :) 
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on January 02, 2012, 10:40:24 PM
I would take Ridgwell over Warnock in an instant and Gardner for Collins sounds good too.

Blimey Steve, have you lost your mind? Warnock had a super game against Chelsea and he had a disaster today. The worst he's ever played for us, so normally he plays better than that. Keep a sense of balance mate. Liam Fucking Ridgewell - aka The Price of Calamity. That's the last thing we need. Plus, he's still on duty keeping that lot in the gutter.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Jimmy Smash on January 02, 2012, 10:45:08 PM
Blimey Steve, have you lost your mind? Warnock had a super game against Chelsea and he had a disaster today. The worst he's ever played for us, so normally he plays better than that. Keep a sense of balance mate. Liam Fucking Ridgewell - aka The Price of Calamity. That's the last thing we need. Plus, he's still on duty keeping that lot in the gutter.

Is that the Katie Price of Calamity?  ;)
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Steve kirk on January 02, 2012, 10:46:32 PM
Havent lost my mind Toronto ( well maybe a little regarding Ridgewell) but I have never rated Warnock from day one always cutting inside and putting us in trouble, the occasional good game does not disguise his terrible shortcomings, he frightens me to death.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: old man villa fan on January 02, 2012, 10:48:30 PM
It always surprises me how people talk about signing this player or that player, particularly when they are midfield players that are very much like what we have already.  It is almost as though we must sign somebody just for the sake of it.

In my opinion we are crying out for a strong, dominating midfield player that can play a bit as some others have said but who is out there.

I have seen mentioned Krankjcar and Pienaar but at the expense of who, N'Zogbia and Albrighton?  What's the point.

We also need a central defender that is better with the ball at his feet than Dunne, Collins and Cuellar.  I know he is beyond us as he will go somewhere better but if we could get Samba who dominates, I would play Clark next to him and get rid of Dunne and Collins.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on January 02, 2012, 10:49:40 PM
Havent lost my mind Toronto ( well maybe a little regarding Ridgewell) but I have never rated Warnock from day one always cutting inside and putting us in trouble, the occasional good game does not disguise his terrible shortcomings, he frightens me to death.

If you are suggesting we could do better then I won't stand in the way of your assessment. But please wash your mind of Liam Ridgewell as the answer sir.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 02, 2012, 10:51:24 PM
We also need a central defender that is better with the ball at his feet than Dunne, Collins and Cuellar.  I know he is beyond us as he will go somewhere better but if we could get Samba who dominates, I would play Clark next to him and get rid of Dunne and Collins.


Our main problem is the defence.

It doesn't matter how well the front six play if the back four as so susceptible to fuck ups and conceding from set pieces. it is infuriating, as it frequently undoes all the good work elsewhere on the pitch.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: old man villa fan on January 02, 2012, 10:51:52 PM
........ Cuellar stays right back.Sorted  :) 

The second goal today shows why Cuellar will never make a fullback amongst other reasons.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TaxDodger on January 02, 2012, 11:05:01 PM
If we need a left back can we not try and sign Wayne Bridge again? I know we could never afford what he's currently on, but he does seem pretty desperate to play first team football so perhaps he'd be willing to take a significant paycut.

Wayne Bridge wouldn't be in improvement on Warnock IMHO.

I'd probably have agreed with you.. Until today..
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: gervilla on January 02, 2012, 11:11:56 PM
If we need a left back can we not try and sign Wayne Bridge again? I know we could never afford what he's currently on, but he does seem pretty desperate to play first team football so perhaps he'd be willing to take a significant paycut.

Wayne Bridge wouldn't be in improvement on Warnock IMHO.

I'd probably have agreed with you.. Until today..

I remember watching his West Ham debut. It was worse than Warnock today and that says something.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Karl Bridges on January 02, 2012, 11:44:08 PM
Jelavic left out of the Rangers side today.

Jelavic and Krankjcar Croatian double deal?
I wonder if they have the same agent...

He refused to play, like he did at Vienna to get the move to Rangers.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Karl Bridges on January 02, 2012, 11:45:59 PM
Kendrick has just tweeted that the Robbie Keane rumour is true, loan for 2 months.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 02, 2012, 11:47:08 PM
Kendrick has just tweeted that the Robbie Keane rumour is true, loan for 2 months.

Amazing.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Jimmy Smash on January 02, 2012, 11:48:05 PM
Well. Aston Villa are like the Mounties. It doesn't matter how long it takes us, we always get our man.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Shoody on January 02, 2012, 11:48:28 PM
Mat Kendrick - Villa ARE interested in Robbie Keane on a 2 month loan.

For me. That confirms we're losing a striker. Hopefully its just Fonz on loan somewhere. I doubt it will be though.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Risso on January 02, 2012, 11:49:30 PM
Well. Aston Villa are like the Mounties. It doesn't matter how long it takes us, we always get our man.

Someone should tell Lerner that Alex Ferguson didn't rate him.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 02, 2012, 11:49:37 PM
I wonder if Fergie will bother psyching us out again?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 02, 2012, 11:51:48 PM
Honestly, how low can our stock get?

What's Gary Pallister doing these days? Maybe we can get him on a pay as you play to stiffen up the defence.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 02, 2012, 11:52:21 PM
Our stock is desperately low.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Risso on January 02, 2012, 11:54:45 PM
What amazes me is that according to McLeish, he hasn't discussed the transfer window with Lerner yet.  It's January, and as ever we don't appear to have any sort of plan.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 02, 2012, 11:55:53 PM
What amazes me is that according to McLeish, he hasn't discussed the transfer window with Lerner yet.  It's January, and as ever we don't appear to have any sort of plan.

Probably can't get hold of him, I'd be surprised if we could afford a company phone.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 02, 2012, 11:56:56 PM
Hands up who thought that this far into Randy's reign we'd be talking about taking Robbie Keane on loan and fans talk of re-signing Craig Gardner and Liam fucking Ridgewell.

I swear there's an alternate universe where a millionaire, non follically challenged version of me is looking at me and pissing himself at what I have to suffer supporting Villa while he watches Lionel Messi lift the European Cup for us for the 18th year in a row.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Summers on January 03, 2012, 12:10:24 AM
I'm all for Keane coming in. He has something about him. He can make chances, he can also take them. It's something we need.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Risso on January 03, 2012, 12:19:53 AM
I'm all for Keane coming in. He has something about him. He can make chances, he can also take them. It's something we need.

I can't see the point.  We already have the personnel, we just don't play in a way that allows us to create and score many goals.  Adding Keane would do nothing to rectify that.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Summers on January 03, 2012, 12:21:21 AM
I'm all for Keane coming in. He has something about him. He can make chances, he can also take them. It's something we need.

I can't see the point.  We already have the personnel, we just don't play in a way that allows us to create and score many goals.  Adding Keane would do nothing to rectify that.

If suddenly Ireland loses form again, and we intend to carry on playing with an attacking midfielder behind Bent/Gabby then Keane would fit the role much better than Heskey.

Though I do agree our style of play is still the biggest issue.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: villadelph on January 03, 2012, 12:32:58 AM
I'm all for Keane coming in. He has something about him. He can make chances, he can also take them. It's something we need.

I can't see the point.  We already have the personnel, we just don't play in a way that allows us to create and score many goals.  Adding Keane would do nothing to rectify that.

If suddenly Ireland loses form again, and we intend to carry on playing with an attacking midfielder behind Bent/Gabby then Keane would fit the role much better than Heskey.

Though I do agree our style of play is still the biggest issue.

I don't understand where Keane would fit into the squad. If Bent doesn't play than surely Gabby gets his spot.. no? I don't want to see Gab get stuck out on the wing again.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JJ-AV on January 03, 2012, 12:36:36 AM
Bit annoying to see us get passed off the park by a young, exciting side who earn relatively little wages in comparison to our overpaid, prehistoric cloggers, then come home and find we're signing another of Dunne's mates on big wages so he can get fit for the Euros.

Instead of paying him 60k a week for a few months, why don't we invest the money in a younger player from the Championship, or give Weimann a go? It's not like we're competing for anything afterall.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: eamonn on January 03, 2012, 12:38:49 AM
Keane huh? 13 years too late. What about Benni McCarthy, has he become too fat or he could he finally do a job for us? Expect McGeadie in on the last day, as we beat MON to the signing.

Christ it's bad enough watching Villa and Ireland play separately without them turning into each other.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Irish villain on January 03, 2012, 12:51:01 AM
What amazes me is that according to McLeish, he hasn't discussed the transfer window with Lerner yet.  It's January, and as ever we don't appear to have any sort of plan.

Hopefully this is a case of good poker playing? Not letting others know our strength?

I fear I am being very generous to the whole bloody lot of them with that comment though.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on January 03, 2012, 12:52:30 AM
I think it's a good move. He plays with a lot of energy and it's only for two months. Landon Donovan showed last year that he can provide a spark on loan to Everton, and so can Keane.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Shoody on January 03, 2012, 01:01:53 AM
Landon Donovan > My Nan > A dead rat > Alan Hutton as a Striker > Heskey > Heskey's Girlfriend > Hutton as a Right Back > Balaban > Djemba-Djemba > The Dead Rat's Dead Sister > Robbie Keane on 60k a week and un-fit
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Summers on January 03, 2012, 01:30:30 AM
I'm all for Keane coming in. He has something about him. He can make chances, he can also take them. It's something we need.

I can't see the point.  We already have the personnel, we just don't play in a way that allows us to create and score many goals.  Adding Keane would do nothing to rectify that.

If suddenly Ireland loses form again, and we intend to carry on playing with an attacking midfielder behind Bent/Gabby then Keane would fit the role much better than Heskey.

Though I do agree our style of play is still the biggest issue.

I don't understand where Keane would fit into the squad. If Bent doesn't play than surely Gabby gets his spot.. no? I don't want to see Gab get stuck out on the wing again.

I just said where I thought he could be useful in the post you quoted. Simples.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: KRS on January 03, 2012, 02:13:31 AM
If AM persists with this playing style then the obvious move would be for a forward who get on the end of things and hold the ball up. If we sign Keane and continue with the long punts from the back then AM will have baffled me completely.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JUAN PABLO on January 03, 2012, 03:00:45 AM
So Stoke will have Diame and Palacios. Ouch.

They seem to have 30 strikers and 44 defenders .       

I would prefer Diame than Krankie to be honest
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 03, 2012, 08:37:20 AM
If 2 months of Keane on loan means we are selling Bent and waiting to the summer to replace it would not shock anyone would it. Depends on what is offered, but were I Bent, who is a finisher, not creating a single chance at home to Swansea would make me want to leave, his career has totally stagnated.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TheTimVilla on January 03, 2012, 08:57:31 AM
Keane huh? 13 years too late. What about Benni McCarthy, has he become too fat or he could he finally do a job for us? Expect McGeadie in on the last day, as we beat MON to the signing.

Christ it's bad enough watching Villa and Ireland play separately without them turning into each other.
And Danny Blind? Is Keane injured yet?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 03, 2012, 09:58:02 AM
I'm all for Keane coming in. He has something about him. He can make chances, he can also take them. It's something we need.

I can't see the point.  We already have the personnel, we just don't play in a way that allows us to create and score many goals.  Adding Keane would do nothing to rectify that.

Watching the game yesterday it was screaming for one of the more forward players to drop deep and recieve the ball, as the defenders had virtually no forward passing options.  Keane does that.  He's different to our present strikers, so gives a genuine option to change a game off the bench.

On a short term deal I think it's worth doing.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: taylorsworkrate on January 03, 2012, 10:06:04 AM
Robbie Keane, we should sign him.

Oh wait, just checked the calendar and its not 1999.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: NeilH on January 03, 2012, 10:11:17 AM
Robbie Keane, we should sign him.

Oh wait, just checked the calendar and its not 1999.

What have we got to lose on this. At least he'll add some competition up front and give us an option from the bench. Of course its 10 years too late, but I still believe that it is a good short term option.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Vanilla on January 03, 2012, 10:12:55 AM
Robbie Keane, we should sign him.

Oh wait, just checked the calendar and its not 1999.

What have we got to lose on this. At least he'll add some competition up front and give us an option from the bench. Of course its 10 years too late, but I still believe that it is a good short term option.

Jenas was a good short term option and . . . oh!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 03, 2012, 10:20:31 AM
Robbie Keane, we should sign him.

Oh wait, just checked the calendar and its not 1999.

What have we got to lose on this. At least he'll add some competition up front and give us an option from the bench. Of course its 10 years too late, but I still believe that it is a good short term option.

Jenas was a good short term option and . . . oh!

I agree - if Keane gets injured it'll be a bad move.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: garyshawsknee on January 03, 2012, 10:26:15 AM
It seems the Keane thing seems true,didn't think the first day back at work could get anymore depressing. I saw a couple of his games at West Ham last season and he was laughable,hes found his level in the states and should stay there.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 03, 2012, 10:29:05 AM
How many goals has keane scored in the MLS since moving there?  I really see this as a waste of time signing or it could be the fact we are offloading one of our strikers most likely Bent.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 03, 2012, 10:38:35 AM
I'm all for Keane coming in. He has something about him. He can make chances, he can also take them. It's something we need.

I can't see the point.  We already have the personnel, we just don't play in a way that allows us to create and score many goals.  Adding Keane would do nothing to rectify that.

Watching the game yesterday it was screaming for one of the more forward players to drop deep and recieve the ball, as the defenders had virtually no forward passing options.  Keane does that.  He's different to our present strikers, so gives a genuine option to change a game off the bench.

On a short term deal I think it's worth doing.

Keane used to do that.

That's the key point.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Phil from the upper holte on January 03, 2012, 10:40:39 AM
Quote
Hands up who thought that this far into Randy's reign we'd be talking about taking Robbie Keane on loan and fans talk of re-signing Craig Gardner and Liam fucking Ridgewell.

My hands are firmly down, gets worse by the minute
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mister E on January 03, 2012, 10:43:14 AM
Bit annoying to see us get passed off the park by a young, exciting side who earn relatively little wages in comparison to our overpaid, prehistoric cloggers, then come home and find we're signing another of Dunne's mates on big wages so he can get fit for the Euros.

Instead of paying him 60k a week for a few months, why don't we invest the money in a younger player from the Championship, or give Weimann a go? It's not like we're competing for anything afterall.

spot on! Get rid of the freeloading dinosaurs and try some hungry youngsters; can't do much worse.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Phil from the upper holte on January 03, 2012, 10:47:22 AM
Robbie fucking Keane

Woooohooooooooooooooooo
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: NeilH on January 03, 2012, 10:49:09 AM
Bit annoying to see us get passed off the park by a young, exciting side who earn relatively little wages in comparison to our overpaid, prehistoric cloggers, then come home and find we're signing another of Dunne's mates on big wages so he can get fit for the Euros.

Instead of paying him 60k a week for a few months, why don't we invest the money in a younger player from the Championship, or give Weimann a go? It's not like we're competing for anything afterall.

spot on! Get rid of the freeloading dinosaurs and try some hungry youngsters; can't do much worse.

Surely we need some kid of experience though and given our record of buying Championship players (Davis and Delph) I'd be very nervous about making that move.
As regards Weimann. Do you honestly think he's ready yet? And if he isn't do you think it is going to help him going into our current team?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 03, 2012, 10:51:17 AM
As regards Weimann. Do you honestly think he's ready yet? And if he isn't do you think it is going to help him going into our current team?

Are you suggesting we loan him out again?  It might happen with the potential arrival of Robbie Keane. Im surprised Weimann hasn't been given a chance yet especially over this busy festive period.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Fernando Partridge on January 03, 2012, 10:53:02 AM
Speaking of championship players:

Jacob butterfield keeps being mooted - he of Barnsley. From what have seen I like his play and young up and coming player with quality could be a shrewd signing. 

Butterfield injured knee ligaments following a robust challenge from dirty Leeds midfielder Michael Brown and will be out for a while looks like he won't be coming then.

And speaking of other championship players : hows about Rickie Lambert scores goals regularly and a big bustling striker. Also Nicky Manyard is pacy and skillfull add these 2 call it big ecks Jerome and Zigic.

Wilfred Zaha is a quality attackingplayer at Palace but I would think Arsenal Chelsea or Spurs will get that one.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 03, 2012, 10:57:21 AM
If Keane comes in I can see either the Fonz or Heskey going.  For different reasons, I don't think either has a future at the club.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Fernando Partridge on January 03, 2012, 11:05:05 AM
Regards Robbie Keane ... AH come on ya know we'll all be loving that goal celebration.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 03, 2012, 11:05:38 AM
I suppose what harm can a 2 month loan deal do, but hardly inspiring. We need to be looking at young exciting players who are hungry to succeed and technically good.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: eastie on January 03, 2012, 11:07:09 AM
If Keane comes in I can see either the Fonz or Heskey going.  For different reasons, I don't think either has a future at the club.

Keane has probably scored more goals at villa park already than those 2 put together , neither are good enough and keane would be an improvement on both.

Regarding craig gardner i must say he was outstanding for the mackems against man city and as a utility player could maybe be useful , possible swap deal for heskey and cuellar?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: NeilH on January 03, 2012, 11:07:54 AM
As regards Weimann. Do you honestly think he's ready yet? And if he isn't do you think it is going to help him going into our current team?

Are you suggesting we loan him out again?  It might happen with the potential arrival of Robbie Keane. Im surprised Weimann hasn't been given a chance yet especially over this busy festive period.

I'm suggesting that chucking him into our side with the current malaise hanging over it is not going to help the lad.
Until we stop putting in Jekyll and Hyde performances then he'd be best building up his confidence in the stiffs or indeed out on loan.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Irish villain on January 03, 2012, 11:10:03 AM
If 2 months of Keane on loan means we are selling Bent and waiting to the summer to replace it would not shock anyone would it. Depends on what is offered, but were I Bent, who is a finisher, not creating a single chance at home to Swansea would make me want to leave, his career has totally stagnated.

Nothing shocks me these days. I am now prepared at all times for the likelihood that the worst possible scenario that I can envisage will happen.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: KevinGage on January 03, 2012, 11:13:33 AM
Come on Martin, have a word with Ellis Short and offer Keane double the wages we'd pay.

You know you want to.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Irish villain on January 03, 2012, 11:19:02 AM
We're linked with Pienaar today. What are people's thoughts?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2081408/Aston-Villa-hunt-Tottenham-midfielder-Steven-Pienaar.html
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Shrek on January 03, 2012, 11:23:06 AM
Keane is apparently training with spurs until the end of January.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 03, 2012, 11:26:10 AM
We're linked with Pienaar today. What are people's thoughts?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2081408/Aston-Villa-hunt-Tottenham-midfielder-Steven-Pienaar.html

might be a good addition but whats more worrying is that in the same article, it says Eck is also interested in Keith Andrews and Damien Duff! FFS!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: brontebilly on January 03, 2012, 11:28:29 AM
Bit annoying to see us get passed off the park by a young, exciting side who earn relatively little wages in comparison to our overpaid, prehistoric cloggers, then come home and find we're signing another of Dunne's mates on big wages so he can get fit for the Euros.

Instead of paying him 60k a week for a few months, why don't we invest the money in a younger player from the Championship, or give Weimann a go? It's not like we're competing for anything afterall.

Another one of Dunne's mates......... Is your xenophobic tone serious?

You would think the nationality of a player shouldn't matter. By the way which of Given, Dunne, Clark or Ireland aren't good enough for the club?

Don't think Keane is a good fit for the 4231 formation we are playing. Im also against loan deals of this type. But Gabby's form has pretty much gone, Bent regardless of service has been terrible this season and the less said about the other English international striker at the club the better. The Fonz and Weimann don't like look making it at this level. McLeish probably sees Keane as a no risk signing to help get us over the 40 points mark. He does still retain plenty of ability and has guile about him that all our other options lack.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: olaftab on January 03, 2012, 11:34:22 AM
Robbie Keane effectively retired from this standard of football about 5 years ago.  I can not think of a more depressing signing. If it's going to be one of the MLS players I would rather have Juan Pablo Angel back for a couple of months.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: olaftab on January 03, 2012, 11:35:28 AM
I think Weimann will make it. Needs more opportunity  here or a good loan spell.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 03, 2012, 11:36:46 AM
But Gabby's form has pretty much gone

Really?

Slight exaggeration, I'd say. He's looked excellent for most of the season. There's not a lot he can do in a match like yesterday when the other 10 men (or nearly 10) are doing next to nothing.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mister E on January 03, 2012, 11:41:03 AM
Bit annoying to see us get passed off the park by a young, exciting side who earn relatively little wages in comparison to our overpaid, prehistoric cloggers, then come home and find we're signing another of Dunne's mates on big wages so he can get fit for the Euros.

Instead of paying him 60k a week for a few months, why don't we invest the money in a younger player from the Championship, or give Weimann a go? It's not like we're competing for anything afterall.

spot on! Get rid of the freeloading dinosaurs and try some hungry youngsters; can't do much worse.

Surely we need some kid of experience though and given our record of buying Championship players (Davis and Delph) I'd be very nervous about making that move.
As regards Weimann. Do you honestly think he's ready yet? And if he isn't do you think it is going to help him going into our current team?
Take your point, Neil, but we can still achieve a mix of youth and experience with what we've got; and give me the 110% effort coming from a kid taking their chance over the lumbering efforts of Heskey and Collins anytime.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: brontebilly on January 03, 2012, 11:49:32 AM
But Gabby's form has pretty much gone

Really?

Slight exaggeration, I'd say. He's looked excellent for most of the season. There's not a lot he can do in a match like yesterday when the other 10 men (or nearly 10) are doing next to nothing.

When was his last goal? He doesn't look a goal threat at present.

He was very bright early on in the season but seems to be struggling now. Not sure how he can escape criticism for yesterday. Nor the Arsenal game where his attitude never mind the non performance was reminiscent of last season.

Blackburn, Wigan, Norwich, Bolton he was probably our best player but he has got to start getting back into goal scoring positions.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 03, 2012, 11:50:10 AM
But Gabby's form has pretty much gone

Really?

Slight exaggeration, I'd say. He's looked excellent for most of the season. There's not a lot he can do in a match like yesterday when the other 10 men (or nearly 10) are doing next to nothing.

I think that has been a slight exaggeration.  I'd say he has been playing well / very good for most of the season. 
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 03, 2012, 11:50:28 AM
But Gabby's form has pretty much gone

Really?

Slight exaggeration, I'd say. He's looked excellent for most of the season. There's not a lot he can do in a match like yesterday when the other 10 men (or nearly 10) are doing next to nothing.

When asked to play wide, Gabby seems to do better on the left than right for me, which is also N'Zogbia's favoured side.  I think the latters form picked up when Marc came back into the side on the right, leaving him playing on the left.  AM left him there yesterday, meaning Gabby pulled wide right.  Super Marc seems to be his go to guy when someone needs dropping from the front line, but it's clear to me the balance of the side is served much better when he plays.     
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Risso on January 03, 2012, 11:52:55 AM
The team just isn't set up properly.  Before Chelsea we'd really struggled for goals, so what do we do after we get things right and put three past the Cockneys?  Stick Gabby back out on the wing, that's what.  Unbelievable Jeff.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: john robsons sideburns on January 03, 2012, 11:57:22 AM
INS

From the players that we're linked with

Robbie Keane = No ta
Steven Pienaar = Umm, not keen but not totally against it
Nico Kranjcar = YES PLEASE

A few players that I'd like to see us go for include Ashley Williams the Swansea full-back, been very very impressed with him this season, get him now before the big teams come sniffing at the end of the season.

Jimmy Kebe from Reading is a tricky winger and would offer us something that we don't have at the moment, a higher quality version of him is a lad playing in Russia who was at PSV last term who is an electric winger, Balazs Dzsudzsak, this boy can play and has the trickery and invention that we desperately lack.

OUTS

Emile Heskey = YES PLEASE
Habib Beye = I wish
Darren Bent = NO WAY
Stephen Warnock = No thanks, keep him
Carlos Cuellar = No thanks. keep him
Fabian Delph = Yes, get rid

The fact is we don't have many senior pro's as it is, so trying to cull more players from the wage bill is really going to be difficult.  I cannot believe that the wage bill right now is over where it needs to be.  We have less thanm 15 senior pro's (Given, Hutton, Cuellar, Collins, Dunne, Warnock, Beye, Petrov, Delph, Ireland, N'Zogbia, Agbonlahor, Bent, Heskey) with the rest made of up lads through the youth ranks who although on good money, not the £40-£50k a week zone, probably half that (Guzan, Clark, Baker, Bannan, Albrighton, Gardner, Weimann, Delfouneso)  So I really cannot understand the need to further cull the wage bill.  If we cannot sustain our current wage bill then we really are in bother, and plenty of it.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: brontebilly on January 03, 2012, 12:01:00 PM
Robbie Keane effectively retired from this standard of football about 5 years ago.  I can not think of a more depressing signing. If it's going to be one of the MLS players I would rather have Juan Pablo Angel back for a couple of months.

He was the top scorer in the EPL for the calendar year 2007 anyway. 23 goals for Spurs in 2007/08. 53 international goals.

I'm far from Keane's biggest fan. Despite his phenomenal record at international level he divides opinion among Irish fans like no other. But he still has buckets loads of ability. He hasn't been decent at club level for some time and (big if) he still has an appetite for playing club level to a decent standard he will score goals.

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: VillaAlways on January 03, 2012, 12:01:13 PM
Sky reporting Keane back training at Spurs prior to his imminent move to Aston villa
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Risso on January 03, 2012, 12:07:36 PM
Sky reporting Keane back training at Spurs prior to his imminent move to Aston villa

Brilliant.....
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Whiney MacWhineface on January 03, 2012, 12:20:48 PM
Of all the sticking plaster make-dos we're being linked with, I'd rather he worked on what we've got. At least we don't commit ourselves to any future wages...and in that regard Keane is at least temporary.

Sigh.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 03, 2012, 12:21:38 PM
tbf, having thought about it a little more, the Robbie Keane signing cant be all that bad.  its only for 2 months plus he has experience at this level which is something we need to get us to the magic 40 point mark (cant see it being higher than this for survival).  With his experience, he might be able to help some of the younger players at the club i.e. Fonz and Weimann to help them improve?  just a thought....
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pedro25 on January 03, 2012, 12:31:31 PM
We do not have a creative forward who can score, an interesting option, but surely not Keane, he is past it.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JJ-AV on January 03, 2012, 12:50:51 PM
Pienaar would be a good signing.

Although if we're only after loans we can't get him due to the Jenas loan. Not allowed two from the same club, I believe.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on January 03, 2012, 12:53:34 PM
I'd rather sign Keane than Pienaar any day of the week.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: serbentoflight on January 03, 2012, 12:56:10 PM
Keane=10 years too late.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 03, 2012, 01:01:28 PM
Keane=10 years too late.

maybe but he has a lot more experience since then.  Saying that, im still not 100% convinced but lets hope it turns out to be a good signing even though its only for 2 months
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dante Lavelli on January 03, 2012, 01:11:52 PM
Sign Keane.  Send the Fonz on loan.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: 5ft811st2 Durham on January 03, 2012, 01:51:50 PM
The proposed Keane loan just confirms what a pathetic state we're in. A totally pointless waste of time and money.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on January 03, 2012, 02:15:07 PM
The club are making a bollix of things recently I agree but signing Keane for a month or two is improving our options over Heskey for instance and so I can see a point to it at least. Its about a million miles away from what is required though and so hopefully just one of several deals.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: MarkM on January 03, 2012, 02:15:14 PM
The proposed Keane loan just confirms what a pathetic state we're in. A totally pointless waste of time and money.

I agree, what has it come to when the best we can hope for is a PL refugee who is about 10 years too late arriving!

Can we honestly say that things are looking better for us?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TonyD on January 03, 2012, 02:16:07 PM
The proposed Keane loan just confirms what a pathetic state we're in. A totally pointless waste of time and money.

Bent's off is the reason.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: London Villan on January 03, 2012, 02:16:47 PM
Keane would do a job in the "hole" behind Bent if Ireland was knackered, injured, missing, off form etc...

How did they get on together at Spurs?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TonyD on January 03, 2012, 02:19:00 PM
The proposed Keane loan just confirms what a pathetic state we're in. A totally pointless waste of time and money.

Bent's off is the reason.
But you are right - it is not a progressive move.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on January 03, 2012, 02:24:39 PM
How does Robbie Keane for two months equate to Bent leaving?

What happens when Keane goes back to LA for instance?
Nah, I very much doubt it.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mister E on January 03, 2012, 02:25:50 PM
Perhaps it means that Ivanhoe is off ....
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TonyD on January 03, 2012, 02:28:52 PM
How does Robbie Keane for two months equate to Bent leaving?

What happens when Keane goes back to LA for instance?
Nah, I very much doubt it.

We have 5 strikers (I know some think Heskey is not even a footballer but he's on the books) so why would we bring in another if somebody wasnt going?   My god - it might be Gabby - please no.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mister E on January 03, 2012, 02:30:08 PM
How does Robbie Keane for two months equate to Bent leaving?

What happens when Keane goes back to LA for instance?
Nah, I very much doubt it.

We have 5 strikers (I know some think Heskey is not even a footballer but he's on the books) so why would we bring in another if somebody wasnt going?   My god - it might be Gabby - please no.

Heskey or Delfouneso - and we'd miss neither.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 03, 2012, 02:35:05 PM
Maybe both the fonz and heskey could be off?  Heskey as he is in the last yr of his contract so we would want some money for him and Fonz as we need to raise more funds and the fact that he probably isn't good enough for this level
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TonyD on January 03, 2012, 02:36:06 PM
How does Robbie Keane for two months equate to Bent leaving?

What happens when Keane goes back to LA for instance?
Nah, I very much doubt it.

We have 5 strikers (I know some think Heskey is not even a footballer but he's on the books) so why would we bring in another if somebody wasnt going?   My god - it might be Gabby - please no.

Heskey or Delfouneso - and we'd miss neither.
The Fonz has had very very limited pitch time, so that's a tad harsh.  Where as the other guy - I will have a little party when he goes.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TaxDodger on January 03, 2012, 02:36:34 PM
How does Robbie Keane for two months equate to Bent leaving?

What happens when Keane goes back to LA for instance?
Nah, I very much doubt it.

We have 5 strikers (I know some think Heskey is not even a footballer but he's on the books) so why would we bring in another if somebody wasnt going?   My god - it might be Gabby - please no.

Because Keane is better than three of them. I'd be very, very suprised if Bent or Gabby left this window. I'd be even more suprised if this proposed Keane deal has anything to do with either of them leaving.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TonyD on January 03, 2012, 02:41:03 PM
How does Robbie Keane for two months equate to Bent leaving?

What happens when Keane goes back to LA for instance?
Nah, I very much doubt it.

We have 5 strikers (I know some think Heskey is not even a footballer but he's on the books) so why would we bring in another if somebody wasnt going?   My god - it might be Gabby - please no.

Because Keane is better than three of them. I'd be very, very suprised if Bent or Gabby left this window. I'd be even more suprised if this proposed Keane deal has anything to do with either of them leaving.
Hope you are right
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on January 03, 2012, 03:02:48 PM
Robbie Keane will be no different to having say a Craig Bellamy, just with a better reputation. He'll be used sparingly yet will keep Gabby and Bent on their toes, will offer far more than Heskey and Fonz and is a different type of striker to what we have right now. He will add some enthusiasm to the club and will want to do well to stay sharp ahead of the Euros. He has significant experience at this level, and is a short term commitment on the part of the club. He's not on a massive salary - around £35 grand a week at LA, and we might not even be paying all of it.

I'd be concerned if this was a permanent signing, but it's not. There's no lose in this situation because if it doesn't work he goes back. If it does then great. The worst thing would be if ends up somewhere else and does well, and we'd be asking why we didn't take advantage of the situation?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 03, 2012, 03:10:51 PM
Robbie Keane will be no different to having say a Craig Bellamy, just with a better reputation.

Well, and considerably shitter.

Bellamy is still a top level player. Keane isn't
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Merv on January 03, 2012, 03:11:42 PM
I agree. It's for two months; Keane gets to stay competitive during a period he'd otherwise not be playing, we get the option of being able to use a striker of undoubted quality (albeit perhaps now past his prime), and given the state of our squad, we can't turn our noses up.

We could do with a central midfield player, mind.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on January 03, 2012, 03:11:58 PM
Robbie Keane will be no different to having say a Craig Bellamy, just with a better reputation. He'll be used sparingly yet will keep Gabby and Bent on their toes, will offer far more than Heskey and Fonz and is a different type of striker to what we have right now. He will add some enthusiasm to the club and will want to do well to stay sharp ahead of the Euros. He has significant experience at this level, and is a short term commitment on the part of the club. He's not on a massive salary - around £35 grand a week at LA, and we might not even be paying all of it.

I'd be concerned if this was a permanent signing, but it's not. There's no lose in this situation because if it doesn't work he goes back. If it does then great. The worst thing would be if ends up somewhere else and does well, and we'd be asking why we didn't take advantage of the situation?

In a nutshell.
Maybe Weimann gets another loan deal somewhere for a couple of months or if God truly hasn't abandoned us we pack Heskey off to MON.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on January 03, 2012, 03:16:46 PM
Robbie Keane will be no different to having say a Craig Bellamy, just with a better reputation. He'll be used sparingly yet will keep Gabby and Bent on their toes, will offer far more than Heskey and Fonz and is a different type of striker to what we have right now. He will add some enthusiasm to the club and will want to do well to stay sharp ahead of the Euros. He has significant experience at this level, and is a short term commitment on the part of the club. He's not on a massive salary - around £35 grand a week at LA, and we might not even be paying all of it.

I'd be concerned if this was a permanent signing, but it's not. There's no lose in this situation because if it doesn't work he goes back. If it does then great. The worst thing would be if ends up somewhere else and does well, and we'd be asking why we didn't take advantage of the situation?

In a nutshell.
Maybe Weimann gets another loan deal somewhere for a couple of months or if God truly hasn't abandoned us we pack Heskey off to MON.

I'd like to see Fonz on loan also because his confidence looks shot. He needs a half season or at least a few months playing in the Championship to get him some goals. It's easy to forget how prolific he was coming through the ranks. He needs to get that belief back.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Olneythelonely on January 03, 2012, 03:27:05 PM
Bellamy is far, far better than Keane.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: garyshawsknee on January 03, 2012, 03:34:12 PM
I think you're doing an injustice to Bellamy TV,Keane has been off Premier league standard for two or three years now. I'd rather have Ireland or Bannan playing in his role.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 03, 2012, 03:37:35 PM
I think you're doing an injustice to Bellamy TV,Keane has been off Premier league standard for two or three years now. I'd rather have Ireland or Bannan playing in his role.

His role, should he come, would be as a straiker off the bench to change a game and/or get us a goal.  He's a different player to the two you mention, so I'd like both options on the bench and choose which is best during the game.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 03, 2012, 03:38:28 PM
But 12 months ago you would have been pushed to get a taker for a Bellamy hardly lighting up trees in the Chamipionship, he has only recovered form due to being used sparingly by Liverpool and because the rest of their options have been so poor. Not convinced Keane is that much worse to be honest.


Looking at who we are being linked with, there is part of me that says in the summer when Beye, Cuellar, Heskey etc leave and the wage bill comes down further, that we should spend 20 ish million on replacements from the lower leagues, try and get some value for money at young ish ages and see how they do.

For example, if we got a bid of 25 million plus for Bent, had Gabby up on his own, would 3-4 million on Jordan Rhodes be a viable alternative if we are never going to play to Bents strengths? It depresses me, but maybe if re-invested wisely it wouldn't be so bad. I would certainly be more than happy to see us let Warnock, Dunne and Collins go and replace them with the sorts he did at Blues, getting the next Dann, Johnson etc.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on January 03, 2012, 03:39:53 PM
Fuck Bellamy. He isnt available for a short loan deal and Keane is.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: garyshawsknee on January 03, 2012, 03:50:15 PM
I think you're doing an injustice to Bellamy TV,Keane has been off Premier league standard for two or three years now. I'd rather have Ireland or Bannan playing in his role.

His role, should he come, would be as a straiker off the bench to change a game and/or get us a goal.  He's a different player to the two you mention, so I'd like both options on the bench and choose which is best during the game.

I hope you're right John,I don't think he can be much influence on games anymore,of course,if he does,ill be the first to say it was a great signing!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on January 03, 2012, 03:50:31 PM
I think you're doing an injustice to Bellamy TV,Keane has been off Premier league standard for two or three years now. I'd rather have Ireland or Bannan playing in his role.

Bellamy was playing Championship football last season and has only this season come back to Liverpool. He's got a proven record, and as Bellamy showed the other night still has the ability to make a difference given the opportunity. Plus, he is still playing for his country at a good level. He's not an every game forward anymore I'll grant you that, but he still has enough left in the tank to make a difference off the bench or based on specific circumstances.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 03, 2012, 03:51:00 PM
Fuck Bellamy. He isnt available for a short loan deal and Keane is.

There is that. I am a bit depressed with football today. Randy should put some of us in charge.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 03, 2012, 03:54:38 PM
I think you're doing an injustice to Bellamy TV,Keane has been off Premier league standard for two or three years now. I'd rather have Ireland or Bannan playing in his role.

Bellamy was playing Championship football last season and has only this season come back to Liverpool. He's got a proven record, and as Bellamy showed the other night still has the ability to make a difference given the opportunity. Plus, he is still playing for his country at a good level. He's not an every game forward anymore I'll grant you that, but he still has enough left in the tank to make a difference off the bench or based on specific circumstances.

Not sure that makes a good anti-Keane argument given that he'll be in the Euros this summer with Ireland and Bellamy won't?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on January 03, 2012, 03:57:25 PM
I think you're doing an injustice to Bellamy TV,Keane has been off Premier league standard for two or three years now. I'd rather have Ireland or Bannan playing in his role.

Bellamy was playing Championship football last season and has only this season come back to Liverpool. He's got a proven record, and as Bellamy showed the other night still has the ability to make a difference given the opportunity. Plus, he is still playing for his country at a good level. He's not an every game forward anymore I'll grant you that, but he still has enough left in the tank to make a difference off the bench or based on specific circumstances.

Not sure that makes a good anti-Keane argument given that he'll be in the Euros this summer with Ireland and Bellamy won't?

Not sure I'm following you John, so sorry if I'm getting this wrong. I'm not anti-Keane. I'm pro Keane and I think the fact that he is playing at the Euros will make him want to do well and stay sharp.

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 03, 2012, 04:01:25 PM
In that case - my bad!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: garyshawsknee on January 03, 2012, 04:02:36 PM
I think City didn't wanna loan him to another PL team,and he wanted to play for Cardiff,whereas Keane was only interesting desperate West Ham and then had no takers after his inept displays for them.

I suppose I should point out that my views are clouded by an irrational hatred of Keane....still don't think he's good enough.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: hawkeye on January 03, 2012, 04:05:56 PM
Robbie Keane will be no different to having say a Craig Bellamy, just with a better reputation. He'll be used sparingly yet will keep Gabby and Bent on their toes, will offer far more than Heskey and Fonz and is a different type of striker to what we have right now. He will add some enthusiasm to the club and will want to do well to stay sharp ahead of the Euros. He has significant experience at this level, and is a short term commitment on the part of the club. He's not on a massive salary - around £35 grand a week at LA, and we might not even be paying all of it.

I'd be concerned if this was a permanent signing, but it's not. There's no lose in this situation because if it doesn't work he goes back. If it does then great. The worst thing would be if ends up somewhere else and does well, and we'd be asking why we didn't take advantage of the situation?

In a nutshell.
Maybe Weimann gets another loan deal somewhere for a couple of months or if God truly hasn't abandoned us we pack Heskey off to MON.
Just like Pires was a great idea. Another spent force!Taking in past it players like  Keane is not the answer.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: usav on January 03, 2012, 04:05:58 PM
We've been linked with Robbie Keane since the days of John Gregory.....trust us to get him now.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TimTheVillain on January 03, 2012, 04:13:36 PM
Robbie Keane will be no different to having say a Craig Bellamy, just with a better reputation.

Well, and considerably shitter.

Bellamy is still a top level player. Keane isn't

But it would upset Villa fans to have Bellamy playing for the club, seemingly we prefer shit players who are angels.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on January 03, 2012, 04:16:46 PM
Robbie Keane will be no different to having say a Craig Bellamy, just with a better reputation. He'll be used sparingly yet will keep Gabby and Bent on their toes, will offer far more than Heskey and Fonz and is a different type of striker to what we have right now. He will add some enthusiasm to the club and will want to do well to stay sharp ahead of the Euros. He has significant experience at this level, and is a short term commitment on the part of the club. He's not on a massive salary - around £35 grand a week at LA, and we might not even be paying all of it.

I'd be concerned if this was a permanent signing, but it's not. There's no lose in this situation because if it doesn't work he goes back. If it does then great. The worst thing would be if ends up somewhere else and does well, and we'd be asking why we didn't take advantage of the situation?

In a nutshell.
Maybe Weimann gets another loan deal somewhere for a couple of months or if God truly hasn't abandoned us we pack Heskey off to MON.
Just like Pires was a great idea. Another spent force!Taking in past it players like  Keane is not the answer.

It's not ideal and it's not what I'd hope for either, but at 31 Keane is still far more relevant than Pires was when we took him on. Plus Keane already knows half the team and has played with them.

I'm just saying there are far worse deals to do. Keane is better than Heskey. It's that simple.
Were some of you expecting a top striker coming in? I was expecting nothing to be honest so I suppose I'm O.K with this move if it happens.

It's a two month loan. I've had colds that have lasted longer than his Villa career is likely to be.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on January 03, 2012, 04:23:02 PM
Robbie Keane will be no different to having say a Craig Bellamy, just with a better reputation. He'll be used sparingly yet will keep Gabby and Bent on their toes, will offer far more than Heskey and Fonz and is a different type of striker to what we have right now. He will add some enthusiasm to the club and will want to do well to stay sharp ahead of the Euros. He has significant experience at this level, and is a short term commitment on the part of the club. He's not on a massive salary - around £35 grand a week at LA, and we might not even be paying all of it.

I'd be concerned if this was a permanent signing, but it's not. There's no lose in this situation because if it doesn't work he goes back. If it does then great. The worst thing would be if ends up somewhere else and does well, and we'd be asking why we didn't take advantage of the situation?

In a nutshell.
Maybe Weimann gets another loan deal somewhere for a couple of months or if God truly hasn't abandoned us we pack Heskey off to MON.
Just like Pires was a great idea. Another spent force!Taking in past it players like  Keane is not the answer.

It's not ideal and it's not what I'd hope for either, but at 31 Keane is still far more relevant than Pires was when we took him on. Plus Keane already knows half the team and has played with them.

I'm just saying there are far worse deals to do. Keane is better than Heskey. It's that simple.
Were some of you expecting a top striker coming in? I was expecting nothing to be honest so I suppose I'm O.K with this move if it happens.

It's a two month loan. I've had colds that have lasted longer than his Villa career is likely to be.

exactly. It's simply not as big a deal as some are making out. I disagree with the notion that he wouldn't be effective as a short term measure, and certainly that in terms of ability he is any less than Bellamy. Neither Bellamy nor Keane are top level players, but they can both do a job when called on. Just don't expect it from either anymore week in, week out.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: paulcomben on January 03, 2012, 04:25:49 PM
Robbie Keane went on loan last January and helped West Ham to get relegated.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Chris Jameson on January 03, 2012, 04:26:24 PM
We've been linked with Robbie Keane since the days of John Gregory.....trust us to get him now.

Bet Carlton Palmer and Steve Bull are checking they've got a good signal on their mobiles.

I hate Keane, simply because of all the pointing he does and his poxy goal celebrations.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: hawkeye on January 03, 2012, 04:26:27 PM
Robbie Keane will be no different to having say a Craig Bellamy, just with a better reputation. He'll be used sparingly yet will keep Gabby and Bent on their toes, will offer far more than Heskey and Fonz and is a different type of striker to what we have right now. He will add some enthusiasm to the club and will want to do well to stay sharp ahead of the Euros. He has significant experience at this level, and is a short term commitment on the part of the club. He's not on a massive salary - around £35 grand a week at LA, and we might not even be paying all of it.

I'd be concerned if this was a permanent signing, but it's not. There's no lose in this situation because if it doesn't work he goes back. If it does then great. The worst thing would be if ends up somewhere else and does well, and we'd be asking why we didn't take advantage of the situation?

In a nutshell.
Maybe Weimann gets another loan deal somewhere for a couple of months or if God truly hasn't abandoned us we pack Heskey off to MON.
Just like Pires was a great idea. Another spent force!Taking in past it players like  Keane is not the answer.

It's not ideal and it's not what I'd hope for either, but at 31 Keane is still far more relevant than Pires was when we took him on. Plus Keane already knows half the team and has played with them.

I'm just saying there are far worse deals to do. Keane is better than Heskey. It's that simple.
Were some of you expecting a top striker coming in? I was expecting nothing to be honest so I suppose I'm O.K with this move if it happens.

It's a two month loan. I've had colds that have lasted longer than his Villa career is likely to be.
I didnt expect to bring a forward on loan either, if it means replacing Heskey then great, can you imagine those 2 up front? It will give Dunne someone new to go and drink a gallon of Guiness with. (the last time i saw Keane he was totally pissed in a bar in NY). He will fit in well.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 03, 2012, 04:30:02 PM
Robbie Keane went on loan last January and helped West Ham to get relegated.

West Ham were in the relegation zone whne they signed him and he was a starter for them.  We're not in the relegation zone and he'll be an option from the bench for us.  Totally different.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Matt C on January 03, 2012, 04:42:00 PM
In other news Elliot Parish has signed for Cardiff and Lowry has extended his loan at Millwall for another month.

http://bit.ly/s2W4Hs
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rudy Can't Fail on January 03, 2012, 04:59:32 PM
Robbie Keane will be no different to having say a Craig Bellamy, just with a better reputation.

Well, and considerably shitter.

Bellamy is still a top level player. Keane isn't

Absolutely. Bellamy has been superb for Liverpool this season.
As for Keane, I'm with Chris Jameson, that goal celebration really is utterly pathetic.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: olaftab on January 03, 2012, 05:10:39 PM
I hate Keane, simply because of all the pointing he does and his poxy goal celebrations.

There is no chance of you ever seeing that again in England.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Californian Villain on January 03, 2012, 05:13:32 PM
We've been linked with Robbie Keane since the days of John Gregory.....trust us to get him now.

I didn't want him back then, and I certainly;y don't want him now; a washed-up EPL reject on high wages is the last thing we need, as proved last season by Robert Pires. Please, please...NO!!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on January 03, 2012, 05:14:24 PM
Robbie Keane will be no different to having say a Craig Bellamy, just with a better reputation.

Well, and considerably shitter.

Bellamy is still a top level player. Keane isn't

Absolutely. Bellamy has been superb for Liverpool this season.
As for Keane, I'm with Chris Jameson, that goal celebration really is utterly pathetic.

it is pathetic, but only palatable if he's just scored for us.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 03, 2012, 05:17:38 PM
We've been linked with Robbie Keane since the days of John Gregory.....trust us to get him now.

I didn't want him back then, and I certainly;y don't want him now; a washed-up EPL reject on high wages is the last thing we need, as proved last season by Robert Pires. Please, please...NO!!

Im pretty sure he will offer a hell of a lot more than Robert Pires.  Also, not aimed at you or anything, but what makes people think he will start?  Currently we are down on experienced players and having Keane can add that for a couple of months to ensure we pass the 40point mark
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dave Clark Five on January 03, 2012, 05:24:28 PM
If you want guaranteed goals there is only one man and that is Kevin Phillips. Should never have let him go. Too late now but he is a proper poacher and doesn't miss many sitters.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 03, 2012, 05:25:42 PM
Just read a skysports journo tweet that QPR and Sunderland are battling it out for James Collins.  I think something between £6-£8m is about right?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on January 03, 2012, 05:27:51 PM
Just read a skysports journo tweet that QPR and Sunderland are battling it out for James Collins.  I think something between £6-£8m is about right?

I'll be happily stunned if it is more than £5 mil
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 03, 2012, 05:38:07 PM
Just read a skysports journo tweet that QPR and Sunderland are battling it out for James Collins.  I think something between £6-£8m is about right?

I'll be happily stunned if it is more than £5 mil

Christ, getting some money for him would be a bonus.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulTheVillan on January 03, 2012, 05:41:00 PM
I would be happy with Keane in (on a short term loan) Heskey & Collins out. Sick of the sight of both of them.

There's been rumours of Krancjar & Pienaar. Decent attacking players, hopefully Ireland will kick on now & make that role his own.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on January 03, 2012, 05:45:56 PM
Just read a skysports journo tweet that QPR and Sunderland are battling it out for James Collins.  I think something between £6-£8m is about right?

I'll be happily stunned if it is more than £5 mil

Christ, getting some money for him would be a bonus.

Yep. I actually think Dunne is fine. Yes, he makes some errors but overall he's good to have around. We just need to split up the comedy twins, because together it's a disaster waiting to happen. Then you've got two other muppets at full back. We need a young, quick CB to play alongside Dunne to clean up.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dave Clark Five on January 03, 2012, 05:46:05 PM
I would be happy with Keane in (on a short term loan) Heskey & Collins out. Sick of the sight of both of them.

There's been rumours of Krancjar & Pienaar. Decent attacking players, hopefully Ireland will kick on now & make that role his own.
Ireland has the crowd on his side now. He will warm to that.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dave Clark Five on January 03, 2012, 05:51:03 PM
Just read a skysports journo tweet that QPR and Sunderland are battling it out for James Collins.  I think something between £6-£8m is about right?

I'll be happily stunned if it is more than £5 mil

Christ, getting some money for him would be a bonus.

Yep. I actually think Dunne is fine. Yes, he makes some errors but overall he's good to have around. We just need to split up the comedy twins, because together it's a disaster waiting to happen. Then you've got two other muppets at full back. We need a young, quick CB to play alongside Dunne to clean up.
Dunne has a good bit of ball control at times. Having to cover for Warnock meant he was getting countless balls passed back to him against Swansea. I think he was put under undue pressure and was getting loads of stick like 'don't pass it to him, he's useless.' He is good at his job but people need to accept that he is a centre half. I wouldn't want to play against him.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 03, 2012, 05:55:12 PM
Dunne, though not without his faults,  is a much, much better player than Collins
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: john e on January 03, 2012, 05:55:50 PM
If you want guaranteed goals there is only one man and that is Kevin Phillips. Should never have let him go. Too late now but he is a proper poacher and doesn't miss many sitters.


agree 100%
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Shrek on January 03, 2012, 05:58:07 PM
Dunne looked a world beater against Arsenal I think it was with Cuellar next to him.

I'd love to sell Collins and resign Cuellar.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on January 03, 2012, 05:59:42 PM
Dunne, though not without his faults,  is a much, much better player than Collins

Simply put, Collins is a West Ham level defender that we bought from..er...West Ham....
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: midnite on January 03, 2012, 06:02:52 PM
Dunne, though not without his faults,  is a much, much better player than Collins

Simply put, Collins is a West Ham level defender that we bought from..er...West Ham....

Yeah agree with your there. He's just not took the step up. Dunne has to cover for him too much which then throws his game off. The partnership doesn't work and hasn't. Dunne seemed much better with cuellar next to him.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Matt C on January 03, 2012, 06:35:14 PM
Cripes, if someone is seriously willing to pay £6-8m for Collins then we should bite their hands off shouldn't we? Get Cuellar in his place plus we have Clark/Baker to call on and then use that money to improve the team elsewhere.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: James on January 03, 2012, 06:41:24 PM
Just picked this up from Sporting Life:

"1528: Andrew Morton shares my battered emotions, writing: "Like you, I too have suffered the major ups and downs over the past two games. The result yesterday clearly negated the Chelsea efforts. Whilst at the game yesterday (through the privilege of where our season tickets are) I was chatting to a couple of ex players still heavily involved with the club, and they said “quietly” that a deal to see James Collins going to Sunderland and Craig Gardner returning to Villa Park is at an advanced state. Also, one Liam Ridgewell to return! A big YES to the Gardner deal but not sure about Ridgewell. As for yesterday’s performance, I just wish “fans” would accept that Bick Eck is not the only one at fault. He can only work with what he’s got. Training skills is one thing, but if players don’t seem to have their heart’s in it (yes Messrs Bent, Collins, Warnock Cuellar and N’Zogbia I’m talking about you!) what can he really do, play juniors??? I believe the problems STILL stem from the financial ineptitude of MON which has caused Mr. Lerner to say enough is enough. I genuinely believe Alex is being hamstrung for the sins of his predecessors. Is it time for RAL to perhaps find a more financially committed owner? Thank you very much Mr Chairman for the Holte Pub and in-ground corporate facilities, but last time I checked no Michelin star ever won a trophy or finished top four!! Here endeth the moan......until the next time!! Happy New Year to ALL expectant football fans this transfer window."

Hmmmm.

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rigadon on January 03, 2012, 06:41:35 PM
Cripes, if someone is seriously willing to pay £6-8m for Collins then we should bite their hands off shouldn't we? Get Cuellar in his place plus we have Clark/Baker to call on and then use that money to improve the team elsewhere.

Wouldn't be sad to see Collins go.  But still not utterly convinced by Cuellar (after 4 seasons) either.  A ball playing centre half would be great - maybe that'll be Clarke. 

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rigadon on January 03, 2012, 06:43:41 PM
Craig Gardner?  Really?  After all the badge kissing down the road?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: James on January 03, 2012, 06:45:09 PM
Craig Gardner?  Really?  After all the badge kissing down the road?

Exactly, BUT, would be a good replacement for Petrov???
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 03, 2012, 06:45:53 PM
Gardner would not be a good replacement for Petrov at all.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: James on January 03, 2012, 06:48:14 PM
Gardner would not be a good replacement for Petrov at all.

Okay, fair enough, I was trying to gauge opinion. I think he has a lot going for him as a player. Care to share why you think what you do?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Nastylee on January 03, 2012, 06:50:07 PM
I also think Petrov is streets ahead of Gardner who only has a shot in his locker.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rigadon on January 03, 2012, 06:51:48 PM
If McLeish re-signs Craig Gardner it'll be suicide.  He's already on very, very thin ice with a lot of Villa fans and resigning a player who publicly did the whole 'life-long bluenose' stuff would be mental.

I don't think he's a bad player mind you.  Just not a great one.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Percy McCarthy on January 03, 2012, 07:04:10 PM
Gardner's a ten goals a-season midfielder who can't play football.

A bit like Bent, who's a 20 goals a season striker who can't play football.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: john e on January 03, 2012, 07:10:02 PM
why dont we take them all back, Gardner, Ridgwell and Davis, they can all arrive in a DeLorean
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 03, 2012, 07:11:38 PM
I disagree, Gardner is a good player, battles well and scores goals. Him, Clark and Gary in there together would work well IMO, and he battles enough to allow a Bannan to play a bit.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dave on January 03, 2012, 07:14:52 PM
I disagree, Gardner is a good player, battles well and scores goals. Him, Clark and Gary in there together would work well IMO, and he battles enough to allow a Bannan to play a bit.
Which is all well and good, but means that one of the only good points of our season so far (Petrov), who is pretty much the glue holding everything together at the moment isn't in the team.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: saunders_heroes on January 03, 2012, 07:18:30 PM
I disagree, Gardner is a good player, battles well and scores goals. Him, Clark and Gary in there together would work well IMO, and he battles enough to allow a Bannan to play a bit.

We'd be relegated with that midfield.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: KevinGage on January 03, 2012, 07:20:15 PM
Just read a skysports journo tweet that QPR and Sunderland are battling it out for James Collins.  I think something between £6-£8m is about right?

I'll be happily stunned if it is more than £5 mil

£8 million?    @.@

What, besides Collins, do they want for that?

The Doug Ellis Stand?   A night with Stephen Ireland?

I think if MON persuades the Sunderland board to pony up that amount, his popularity levels around here will almost be back to the August 2006 high watermark.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: saunders_heroes on January 03, 2012, 07:22:15 PM
As long as we bought a good replacement it wouldn't bother me if Collins left. I'm sick of seeing him hoof the ball up the pitch.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dave on January 03, 2012, 07:25:57 PM
In this ridiculous market, I don't think it's that stupid.

We took him from West Ham's treatment room for £5m. I'd say that his occasionally great and frequently hopeless performances put him comfortably above the likes of Anton Ferdinand who was £6m or so. I'd say his stock has risen rather than fallen over his time with us.

QPR and Sunderland both have money to spend, might as well make it worth our while.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SoccerHQ on January 03, 2012, 07:28:24 PM
I still maintain send Collins up to Blackburn plus 4m and get in Samba, that would be a great deal. Maybe go after Onouha aswell as I can't see City asking for more than 3m for him.

Keane really is scrapping the barrel, he hardly made an impact at West Ham last season and the fact McLeish wanted to sign him for 6m in the last January window shows why I don't trust this bloke with any money in this window.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Brend'Watkins on January 03, 2012, 07:29:29 PM
Robbie Keane will be no different to having say a Craig Bellamy, just with a better reputation.

Well, and considerably shitter.

Bellamy is still a top level player. Keane isn't

Absolutely. Bellamy has been superb for Liverpool this season.
As for Keane, I'm with Chris Jameson, that goal celebration really is utterly pathetic.

it is pathetic, but only palatable if he's just scored for us.

No, if Keane turns up in a Villa shirt I will need at least 10 different occasions of viewing that celebration before I make my mind up.  Knowing our luck though he'd probably break his back after the first one.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: KevinGage on January 03, 2012, 07:29:45 PM
Steven Davis?   

For the right price, yes.

Though I understand why some would be reluctant to see him back. I'm sure we'd have thought it highly unlikely when he left in 2007 these are the kind of deals we'd be reduced to in 2011/12

But Gardner (C) ?   Ridgewell?   

Beyond the pale.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SoccerHQ on January 03, 2012, 07:30:24 PM
Dunne, though not without his faults,  is a much, much better player than Collins

Correct. I wanted him gone last season by by and large he's played pretty well this year.

We also miss his leadership at the back when he's not around as all our other combinations Cuellar/Collins/Clark look shaky without him there.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 03, 2012, 07:30:55 PM
Onourha is an excellent player and ideal for us. Would think just the type of player we should be looking at.


The midfield I suggested was more for the future than the now, Petrov will need resting in games soon enough though.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SoccerHQ on January 03, 2012, 07:33:03 PM
In this ridiculous market, I don't think it's that stupid.

We took him from West Ham's treatment room for £5m. I'd say that his occasionally great and frequently hopeless performances put him comfortably above the likes of Anton Ferdinand who was £6m or so. I'd say his stock has risen rather than fallen over his time with us.

QPR and Sunderland both have money to spend, might as well make it worth our while.

I tend to use the Zat Knight barometer for this...we signed him for 4.5m and then incredibly Megson came in with 5m for him.

Collins is still fairly young for a centre half...28 ain't he so that should give us a decent fee on its own.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rudy Can't Fail on January 03, 2012, 07:33:05 PM
£8m it is then. Does he need a lift?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TheSandman on January 03, 2012, 07:43:03 PM
Gardner would not be such a bad idea I just struggle to say where he would fit in. Ridgewell would be an absolutely appalling signing. He's crap.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Villanation on January 03, 2012, 07:46:04 PM
This is one of those I heard from a source jobs, so, this has come not from the Villa side of things but to do with someone I know involved with corporate hospitality and another club.

Word is, someone is in for our Gabby........................

As i couldn't possibly contemplate this i will get in first with everybody else's response and what was my response when I heard it today, that is "Rubbish", "Not possible".
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 03, 2012, 07:49:29 PM
Spurs by any chance?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Villanation on January 03, 2012, 07:53:50 PM
Spurs by any chance?

Its deffo a London club, person involved is a catering director and his firm has the contract to supply into Arsenal, Spurs and Chelsea, and he talk to some pretty high ranking people at these clubs.

Strange thing is he has no interest in football, wouldn't know Gabby from Messi.

Load of crap I reckon.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Clampy on January 03, 2012, 07:54:16 PM
Back on to Keane, i think we can all agree that his best days are behind him, but it's not as if we're not paying £6m for him like we might have done a year or two ago. For two months, i can't see what harm it can do.

As for Collins, i'd rather keep him until the summer then sell him, but if the fee is £8m (which i doubt) it would be hard to turn down.

I love to see us put an offer in for Redmond personally. For his age, he looks a hell of a player.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Villanation on January 03, 2012, 08:08:53 PM
Back on to Keane, i think we can all agree that his best days are behind him, but it's not as if we're not paying £6m for him like we might have done a year or two ago. For two months, i can't see what harm it can do.

As for Collins, i'd rather keep him until the summer then sell him, but if the fee is £8m (which i doubt) it would be hard to turn down.

I love to see us put an offer in for Redmond personally. For his age, he looks a hell of a player.

I would agree if just for 2 months it couldn't harm and if we had to lose Bent or god forbid Gabby, then at least there is something in the background, as for long term, not for me, AM maybe a fan and Keane may have done a job for him at the noses had he have pulled that of, but this is a player that has bounced around from one club to another and in the latter stages spent most of the time warming benches finally at the ripe old age of 31 playing in the states in sub level football.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dante Lavelli on January 03, 2012, 09:02:57 PM
I love to see us put an offer in for Redmond personally. For his age, he looks a hell of a player.

I'd like to think that we could make a decent bid for Redmond without having to worry about salaries and transfer money coming in.  I know they have quoted ludicrous numbers but in reality he must be worth about 3m with loads of add ons.  His wages would be minimal too. 
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Jimmy Smash on January 03, 2012, 09:14:49 PM
Yeung's going to be desperate for cash very shortly. A cheeky but not insulting offer for him might go down a treat.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 03, 2012, 09:15:35 PM
Yeung's going to be desperate for cash very shortly. A cheeky but not insulting offer for him might go down a treat.

Well he has something in common with Villa then....
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: VWBelgian on January 03, 2012, 10:26:20 PM
M'vila anyone?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 03, 2012, 10:31:40 PM
M'Vila would be going somewhere significantly better than us I would imagine.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TheSandman on January 03, 2012, 10:34:56 PM
Indeed, at the moment we seem to be shopping in the bargain bin looking at things that are either broken or past their sell-by-date. If we're lucky we might be able to pick up something from the own brand simply value line.

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 03, 2012, 10:44:28 PM
Not even in Sainsburys basics, we are firmly in Lidl (pronounced Leeedl by the way, as I was told repeatedly in Berlin) at the moment.

Kranjcar, Pienaar, Keane lovely.


I see that Butterfield lad has been ruled out for the season, good luck to him and hope he recovers his touch when he is back. Harsh for a 21 year old who must have been eyeing a big move.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 03, 2012, 11:06:00 PM
Back on to Keane, i think we can all agree that his best days are behind him, but it's not as if we're not paying £6m for him like we might have done a year or two ago. For two months, i can't see what harm it can do.

As for Collins, i'd rather keep him until the summer then sell him, but if the fee is £8m (which i doubt) it would be hard to turn down.

I love to see us put an offer in for Redmond personally. For his age, he looks a hell of a player.

Christ, for 8 million pounds we should be prepared to form a human chain to pass him all the way up to Sunderland, hand to hand.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: luke25 on January 03, 2012, 11:12:44 PM
Back on to Keane, i think we can all agree that his best days are behind him, but it's not as if we're not paying £6m for him like we might have done a year or two ago. For two months, i can't see what harm it can do.

As for Collins, i'd rather keep him until the summer then sell him, but if the fee is £8m (which i doubt) it would be hard to turn down.

I love to see us put an offer in for Redmond personally. For his age, he looks a hell of a player.

Christ, for 8 million pounds we should be prepared to form a human chain to pass him all the way up to Sunderland, hand to hand.
For 8 million pounds i'd be willing to create a human centipede and let him walk over us.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Lobsterboy on January 03, 2012, 11:14:36 PM
If we get offered anything like £8million for Collins we need to snap their hands off!

Robbie Keane may be about ten seasons too late but for two months he is a better proposition coming off the bench than Heskey or Delfouneso. I haven't seen enough of Weimann to say if he's a better option than him but Keane will be hungry to play and make an impact so nothing to lose in signing him for me

Craig Gardner? No thanks, would rather have Craig Revel Horwood
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 03, 2012, 11:16:11 PM
If we get offered anything like £8million for Collins we need to snap their hands off!

Robbie Keane may be about ten seasons too late but for two months he is a better proposition coming off the bench than Heskey or Delfouneso. I haven't seen enough of Weimann to say if he's a better option than him but Keane will be hungry to play and make an impact so nothing to lose in signing him for me

Craig Gardner? No thanks, would rather have Craig Revel Horwood

I'd happily take Robbie Keane if the other side of it was never having to see that useless lump Heskey toiling around for us again.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ROBBO on January 03, 2012, 11:17:41 PM
Mcleish has stated the Villa dressing room is the quietist he's ever been involved in, Keane has got a big mouth it fits. Like another poster i have a dream of Samba playing along side Dunne, this would cut out the set piece drama's. Gardner is an interesting one as i think he is a better full back than the idiots we have at the moment but as a midfielder no thanks. I think we will see a lot of players coming and going in January, Eck has had a fair amount of time to look at the players and decide which ones he'll keep.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: KevinGage on January 03, 2012, 11:25:58 PM
If we get offered anything like £8million for Collins we need to snap their hands off!

Robbie Keane may be about ten seasons too late but for two months he is a better proposition coming off the bench than Heskey or Delfouneso. I haven't seen enough of Weimann to say if he's a better option than him but Keane will be hungry to play and make an impact so nothing to lose in signing him for me

Craig Gardner? No thanks, would rather have Craig Revel Horwood

I'd happily take Robbie Keane if the other side of it was never having to see that useless lump Heskey toiling around for us again.

That's the only thing that is mildly appealing about the idea.

But -on balance-  I think if he comes to sit on our bench and come on for 15/20 minutes occasionally, for the wages he'd no doubt command, it's a further waste of resources.  Following so soon after the Jenas fiasco, I'd say we can do without that.  Keane too has increasingly picked up a fair rake of injuries in recent years and been out for long stretches.

If he was to come in, stay injury free and things actually 'clicked,'  well he's gone again in a few months anyway.  So we'd be just tormented with what could have been.

If we had an injury crisis ourselves, I could understand it.  But it smacks of short-termism and desperation really, the kind of move a club with limited scouting and limited imagination might pull.

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dave on January 03, 2012, 11:30:31 PM
...the kind of move a club with limited scouting and limited imagination might pull.
Check. Check.

I was hugely against the idea when it was mooted a while back for £6m and a three year contract.

But a two-month loan where he plays instead of Heskey? Fine by me.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on January 03, 2012, 11:46:45 PM
Keane is pish. Yes, he's better than Heskey  but then so are 99% of the strikers outside of the conference. I'm better as well and i'd be gutted if AM tried to sign me
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 03, 2012, 11:58:58 PM
Keane is pish. Yes, he's better than Heskey  but then so are 99% of the strikers outside of the conference. I'm better as well and i'd be gutted if AM tried to sign me

Because you'd have to show your face at Villa Park?

You walked into that one.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Risso on January 04, 2012, 12:01:40 AM
...the kind of move a club with limited scouting and limited imagination might pull.
Check. Check.

I was hugely against the idea when it was mooted a while back for £6m and a three year contract.

But a two-month loan where he plays instead of Heskey? Fine by me.

Just wait for Keane up front, with Heskey behind him and Gabby on the wing.  Shudder.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on January 04, 2012, 12:21:16 AM
Keane is pish. Yes, he's better than Heskey  but then so are 99% of the strikers outside of the conference. I'm better as well and i'd be gutted if AM tried to sign me

Because you'd have to show your face at Villa Park?

You walked into that one.

meh. bottom line is Keane would be an improvement on Heskey but then the bar's so low it doesn't really matter. what is the point in having someone on loan on top wages who's better than heskey when you could play almost anyone and they'd be better than heskey. You don't need to do  a world wide search to find someone better than Heskey. A quick look through the Villa youth teams over 15 would find a better striker than heskey. You want ideally someome who's better or at least at the same level as Bent or Gabby. minimum is someone better than the fonz
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: old man villa fan on January 04, 2012, 12:23:49 AM
Why would Keane want to come and play for us for a couple of months.  It would not be as if he was putting himself in the shop window for a permanent move back to the PL.  If he thinks that it is, he is as sadly deluded as some of us.

I can understand a younger player doing it but for Keane it surely must be just for the money.  If so, this would be completely the wrong move for us.  I have never seen Keane as a clubman that gives everything for anybody other than himself.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on January 04, 2012, 12:25:24 AM
he's over in yankland for a reason. He's past it and pish.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TheSandman on January 04, 2012, 12:27:00 AM
Why would Keane want to come and play for us for a couple of months.  It would not be as if he was putting himself in the shop window for a permanent move back to the PL.  If he thinks that it is, he is as sadly deluded as some of us.

Keep himself fit and playing ahead of the Euros? Prove to the Irish management he's still up to it at the highest level (rather than semi-retirement in the MLS)?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on January 04, 2012, 12:52:03 AM
Keane is pish. Yes, he's better than Heskey  but then so are 99% of the strikers outside of the conference. I'm better as well and i'd be gutted if AM tried to sign me

Because you'd have to show your face at Villa Park?

You walked into that one.

meh. bottom line is Keane would be an improvement on Heskey but then the bar's so low it doesn't really matter. what is the point in having someone on loan on top wages who's better than heskey when you could play almost anyone and they'd be better than heskey. You don't need to do  a world wide search to find someone better than Heskey. A quick look through the Villa youth teams over 15 would find a better striker than heskey. You want ideally someome who's better or at least at the same level as Bent or Gabby. minimum is someone better than the fonz

Keane is on around £35 grand a week in LA. Hardly top wages by PL standards, and it would be likely we wouldn't be paying the entire thing. Even if it was, for two months hardly the end of the world.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on January 04, 2012, 12:57:33 AM
Keane is pish. Yes, he's better than Heskey  but then so are 99% of the strikers outside of the conference. I'm better as well and i'd be gutted if AM tried to sign me

Because you'd have to show your face at Villa Park?

You walked into that one.

meh. bottom line is Keane would be an improvement on Heskey but then the bar's so low it doesn't really matter. what is the point in having someone on loan on top wages who's better than heskey when you could play almost anyone and they'd be better than heskey. You don't need to do  a world wide search to find someone better than Heskey. A quick look through the Villa youth teams over 15 would find a better striker than heskey. You want ideally someome who's better or at least at the same level as Bent or Gabby. minimum is someone better than the fonz

Keane is on around £35 grand a week in LA. Hardly top wages, and it would be likely we wouldn't be the entire thing. Even if it was, for two months hardly the end of the world.


I still don't see the logic unless someone is moving on. If he was any good then we get him for 2 months. big deal. As is, we get someone who's not as good as our two main strikers for two months, so a rather expensive reserve that we don't keep.....
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on January 04, 2012, 01:00:33 AM
Keane is pish. Yes, he's better than Heskey  but then so are 99% of the strikers outside of the conference. I'm better as well and i'd be gutted if AM tried to sign me

Because you'd have to show your face at Villa Park?

You walked into that one.

meh. bottom line is Keane would be an improvement on Heskey but then the bar's so low it doesn't really matter. what is the point in having someone on loan on top wages who's better than heskey when you could play almost anyone and they'd be better than heskey. You don't need to do  a world wide search to find someone better than Heskey. A quick look through the Villa youth teams over 15 would find a better striker than heskey. You want ideally someome who's better or at least at the same level as Bent or Gabby. minimum is someone better than the fonz

Keane is on around £35 grand a week in LA. Hardly top wages, and it would be likely we wouldn't be the entire thing. Even if it was, for two months hardly the end of the world.


I still don't see the logic unless someone is moving on. If he was any good then we get him for 2 months. big deal. As is, we get someone who's not as good as our two main strikers for two months, so a rather expensive reserve that we don't keep.....

That's the basis of every loan deal ever made. He comes in, hopefully gives us a boost and he leaves. No different to the boost Landon Donovan gave Everton last year and they hope he'll do now, and what Arsenal expect of Henry. If it also means that Fonz gets a month or two on loan at a Championship club to help get him back on track then all the better.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Risso on January 04, 2012, 01:06:21 AM
The difference is that Donovan is excellent and at least as good as anything Everton currently have.  Even a 34 year old Henry will be too good for most Premier League defences.  Keane was waning badly when he left the Premier League, and I don't think that playing in the USwill have sharpened him up.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on January 04, 2012, 01:08:48 AM
how is the late robbie keane a boost? Landon donovan is a half decent player. Keane is arse. He had to go to to yankland to get a game. Blimey juan pablo Angel would have at least stirred the memories and he was pretty bobbins all told even in his prime.  rather have uncle bob back.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: VillaSpen on January 04, 2012, 08:28:51 AM
Ask any West Ham fan what they think of Keane after his loan spell there last season. The impression I have been given is that he sauntered around not caring about any element of his performances because he knew his time there was short. He barley set the SPL alight a few years back and that was yet another "Dream Move" to the sixth team he'd supported since boyhood. I'm hoping that Celtic do come in and 'hijack' the proposed move as I'd be much happier getting a proper look at Weimann, to be honest. We've got very little to lose this season as the first half has drained a lot of enthusiasm from the stands so give the lad an opportunity for an extended period.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on January 04, 2012, 08:33:24 AM
I cant totally understand anybody wishing to give the youngsters a go rather than do this deal.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ROBBO on January 04, 2012, 08:34:07 AM
He won't come why would he, if he gets injured thats him finished, if he did would he put the effort in? bollocks he would.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: DerHammer on January 04, 2012, 08:39:46 AM
Keane to Villa? 10 years too late
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ROBBO on January 04, 2012, 08:42:58 AM
I take it there is absolutely no substance to it anyway.......As usual.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: OzVilla on January 04, 2012, 09:08:01 AM
If we were to sign Robbie Keane it would absolutley sum us up to a tee at the moment.

Journeyman pro, playing in the MLS, twighlight of his carreer but still on decent wages, already proved he was past it at Spam etc etc.

We really would be scrapping the bottom of the barrel.

I fully expect us to sign him.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: The Laughing Policeman on January 04, 2012, 09:34:46 AM
If Keane is coming here for a couple of months, why is he doing fitness training at Spuds 'til Jan 20th?
Surely it would be make more sense for him to train at Bodymoor Heath and get to know his new team mates before he actually plays a game.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Shrek on January 04, 2012, 09:35:54 AM
Ask any West Ham fan what they think of Keane after his loan spell there last season. The impression I have been given is that he sauntered around not caring about any element of his performances because he knew his time there was short. He barley set the SPL alight a few years back and that was yet another "Dream Move" to the sixth team he'd supported since boyhood. I'm hoping that Celtic do come in and 'hijack' the proposed move as I'd be much happier getting a proper look at Weimann, to be honest. We've got very little to lose this season as the first half has drained a lot of enthusiasm from the stands so give the lad an opportunity for an extended period.

I have to pull you up on that one, he got player of the year in the SPL and got near on a goal a game.

But yes he is shit and not worth it, I'd rather have JPA back on loan.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Small Rodent on January 04, 2012, 09:54:27 AM
Not even in Sainsburys basics, we are firmly in Lidl (pronounced Leeedl by the way, as I was told repeatedly in Berlin) at the moment.



Lidl does a lot of food better quality than Sainsbury.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: mal on January 04, 2012, 11:47:21 AM
how is the late robbie keane a boost? Landon donovan is a half decent player. Keane is arse. He had to go to to yankland to get a game. Blimey juan pablo Angel would have at least stirred the memories and he was pretty bobbins all told even in his prime.  rather have uncle bob back.
is too true. I shall be glad when he's been put out to grass as am heartily sick of the transfer window open= robbie keane to Villa rumours. Still at least nobodies mentioned Bentley yet now he's found his level.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JJ-AV on January 04, 2012, 02:49:51 PM
If we can shift Collins to QPR/Sunderland for £6m as reported that'd be a good start.

Don't spend it, make do with the three we're left with and go for Samba in the Summer (and another to replace Cuellar).
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 04, 2012, 03:01:19 PM
The Bent to Liverpool rumours are getting stronger with Lawro saying on radio 5 last night that there are massive rumours in Liverpool that the deal is done.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Somniloquism on January 04, 2012, 03:09:01 PM
I see Cahill seems to be getting a bit greedy now. £70000 p/w isn't enough for him. Anyone would think he was 1st choice England Defender and has been playing CL football week in / week out for one of the top teams rather then not playing very well at Bolton.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JUAN PABLO on January 04, 2012, 03:42:32 PM
The Bent to Liverpool rumours are getting stronger with Lawro saying on radio 5 last night that there are massive rumours in Liverpool that the deal is done.

hope that twat is wrong .   I dont trust AVFC including AMC with the money anyway at the moment .
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JUAN PABLO on January 04, 2012, 03:44:26 PM
I see Cahill seems to be getting a bit greedy now. £70000 p/w isn't enough for him. Anyone would think he was 1st choice England Defender and has been playing CL football week in / week out for one of the top teams rather then not playing very well at Bolton.

mAybe we can give Chelski , Collins at 6 million and they will give us a loan of Malouda
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ktvillan on January 04, 2012, 04:08:14 PM
The Bent to Liverpool rumours are getting stronger with Lawro saying on radio 5 last night that there are massive rumours in Liverpool that the deal is done.

I suppose it makes sense.  Liverpool are struggling to win home games despite creating tons of chances as they don't seem to have anyone who can stick it in the onion bag consistently.  There a very few who can do that as well as Bent.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 04, 2012, 04:18:01 PM
Talksport have put on their website that Aston villa have told them that Darren Bent is not for sale at any price!  They have not been contacted and that no bid will be entertained.
At last our club have opened their mouths.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 04, 2012, 04:20:00 PM
Talksport have put on their website that Aston villa have told them that Darren Bent is not for sale at any price!  They have not been contacted and that no bid will be entertained.
At last our club have opened their mouths.

Hmmm.

Quote
ALEX McLeish has insisted Stewart Downing is “not for sale” after Randy Lerner rejected Liverpool’s £15 million bid for Villa’s star of last season.

McLeish remains determined to hold onto Downing despite Kenny Dalglish testing the claret and blues’ resolve with an offer for the England winger.

But Liverpool – who completed the signing of former Villa midfield target Charlie Adam from Blackpool yesterday – are unlikely to be deterred easily. And McLeish and Lerner could have a major dilemma on their hands if Downing forces the issue and the Reds return with a bid nearer to £20 million.

Villa’s new boss had a conversation with Downing last week and will meet the former Middlesbrough favourite for a more detailed discussion tomorrow.

McLeish is reluctant to lose a second star player just weeks after Downing’s international team-mate Ashley Young joined Manchester United for £16 million.

Villa are adamant they have no desire to sell Downing who cost £10 million, rising to £12 million, when he arrived on crutches with a fractured foot two years ago.

“He had a magnificent season last year and really came to full maturity as a top player,” said McLeish.

“I understand why there’s teams interested in him and that is what happens when you play well consistently.

“His performances last season were top drawer.

That’s why he’s not for sale. The club don’t want to sell him. I spoke to him briefly last week and I intend speaking to him again when all the lads are back in for training.”

http://tinyurl.com/7deryl5
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 04, 2012, 04:21:24 PM
Talksport have put on their website that Aston villa have told them that Darren Bent is not for sale at any price!  They have not been contacted and that no bid will be entertained.
At last our club have opened their mouths.

Hmmm.

Quote
ALEX McLeish has insisted Stewart Downing is “not for sale” after Randy Lerner rejected Liverpool’s £15 million bid for Villa’s star of last season.

McLeish remains determined to hold onto Downing despite Kenny Dalglish testing the claret and blues’ resolve with an offer for the England winger.

But Liverpool – who completed the signing of former Villa midfield target Charlie Adam from Blackpool yesterday – are unlikely to be deterred easily. And McLeish and Lerner could have a major dilemma on their hands if Downing forces the issue and the Reds return with a bid nearer to £20 million.

Villa’s new boss had a conversation with Downing last week and will meet the former Middlesbrough favourite for a more detailed discussion tomorrow.

McLeish is reluctant to lose a second star player just weeks after Downing’s international team-mate Ashley Young joined Manchester United for £16 million.

Villa are adamant they have no desire to sell Downing who cost £10 million, rising to £12 million, when he arrived on crutches with a fractured foot two years ago.

“He had a magnificent season last year and really came to full maturity as a top player,” said McLeish.

“I understand why there’s teams interested in him and that is what happens when you play well consistently.

“His performances last season were top drawer.

“That’s why he’s not for sale. The club don’t want to sell him. I spoke to him briefly last week and I intend speaking to him again when all the lads are back in for training.”

http://tinyurl.com/7deryl5


Yep that's what I thought, makes you think they're trying to encourage a bit. But hopefully I'm in a cynical early January mood and the club is making a genuine statement if they have made a statement at all.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 04, 2012, 04:21:37 PM
oooops, i spoke too soon  :-[ :-[ :-[
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 04, 2012, 04:22:09 PM
At the end of the day, if the club don't really want to sell him, they just need to reject any offers.

If we don't, where does this end?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 04, 2012, 04:23:42 PM
At the end of the day, if the club don't really want to sell him, they just need to reject any offers.

If we don't, where does this end?

First of all selling off the promising youngsters(as they'll be the only assets left) and then eventually in relegation.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 04, 2012, 04:25:39 PM
maybe they wont sell in Jan but will in the summer.  maybe they have realised that they really pissed us all off with the appointment of eck that selling bent in Jan would actually be a bad idea considering we are falling slowly down the league. maybe they are banking on him scoring more goals to save us and then get rid
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: stubbsyandy on January 04, 2012, 04:27:47 PM
A third of the fans don't want Bent anyway, so they will be happy if he goes..the rest of us just hope its media talk, but really until something happens we should calm down a bit.
I do agree it would be lovely to be chasing big name players in a transfer window rather than being worried we are selling again...
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on January 04, 2012, 04:42:13 PM
A third of the fans don't want Bent anyway, so they will be happy if he goes..the rest of us just hope its media talk, but really until something happens we should calm down a bit.
I do agree it would be lovely to be chasing big name players in a transfer window rather than being worried we are selling again...

which third is that? I find it very hard to believe that 33% of Aston Villa supporters do not want one of the most prolific goalscorers in PL history, and a current England international who's goals saved us from relegation last season wearing our colours.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: David_Nab on January 04, 2012, 04:42:29 PM
A third of the fans don't want Bent anyway, so they will be happy if he goes..the rest of us just hope its media talk, but really until something happens we should calm down a bit.
I do agree it would be lovely to be chasing big name players in a transfer window rather than being worried we are selling again...

IF we did sell Bent who would we have left to sell ....
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: stubbsyandy on January 04, 2012, 04:47:46 PM
If you look at the Darren Bent chat, they have a survey Toronto, not that I voted for him to go..
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 04, 2012, 04:48:46 PM
A third of the fans don't want Bent anyway

The poll on the Darren Bent thread would suggest that less than a quarter don't want him.  Personally, I'm baffled as to why even than many of us have taken leave of our senses!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: stubbsyandy on January 04, 2012, 04:52:28 PM
You are right John, my mistake I read it too quickly; I need to calm down!
Its still too many, we finally have a goal scorer, we have cried out for this for years so lets keep him and feed him.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Jimbo on January 04, 2012, 04:59:12 PM
You are right John, my mistake I read it too quickly; I need to calm down!
Its still too many, we finally have a goal scorer, we have cried out for this for years so lets keep him and feed him.

Absolutely right. What we're doing with Bent is akin to having an F1 Ferrari and expecting it to do the job of a tractor. It does one thing, and it does that very well. Use it for the purpose for which it was intended and it will do the business.   
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rigadon on January 04, 2012, 05:09:04 PM
A third of the fans don't want Bent anyway, so they will be happy if he goes..the rest of us just hope its media talk, but really until something happens we should calm down a bit.
I do agree it would be lovely to be chasing big name players in a transfer window rather than being worried we are selling again...

which third is that? I find it very hard to believe that 33% of Aston Villa supporters do not want one of the most prolific goalscorers in PL history, and a current England international who's goals saved us from relegation last season wearing our colours.

I don't think many really want the club to sell Bent.  Certainly for me I think he's the best out and out goal scorer we're likely to get, I just can't warm to him for some reason so wouldn't be distraught if he did leave (as long as we signed another goal scorer of equal talent).

Caroll has been mentioned on here lately, he'd probably fit our style of play better currently.   

When does this trade to buy thing end is what I'd like to know.  I can accept that we DO have to watch our wages, I'd just like to know how far that goes and it's not an answer we;re going to get (which is probably for the best I accept).  Catch 22 for the club: inform fans and manage expectation = advertising to any selling club we're there to be ripped off. 

Along with most clubs right now, our transfer policy is fairly uninspiring. 
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 04, 2012, 05:12:23 PM
I also think selling Bent would extinguish the argument we frequently hear on here that the club are getting the wage bill down and some money in "ready to have another go at it" (meaning in terms of investing for a push to improve ourselves).

For me it'd be the ultimate confirmation that we'd become a larger Wigan - happy if we can survive, live to sell players on, don't invest other than what we raise that way.

You can say that Randy's well within his rights to do that, and he is, but how desperately disappointing would it be for his stewardship of the club to effectively wind us up back where we started - except with masses of debt - and how piss poor a job would he have done of it for it to end that way.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JUAN PABLO on January 04, 2012, 05:13:16 PM
A third of the fans don't want Bent anyway

The poll on the Darren Bent thread would suggest that less than a quarter don't want him.  Personally, I'm baffled as to why even than many of us have taken leave of our senses!

they probably think we would have the 25 million to spend on new players , which I dont think so . 
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: James on January 04, 2012, 05:16:36 PM
As for the Bent to Liverpool rumour I believe it's media hype from certain Liverpool loving journos. I heard that they only have a budget of £10m and are trying for Jelavic from Rangers, which makes sense considering the dosh they spent in the summer which hasn't got them very far has it?

Here's a rumour about us from Sporting Life:

"Aston Villa are considering a £6m bid for Celtic playmaker Ki Sung-Yueng."

? ? ?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: saunders_heroes on January 04, 2012, 05:18:28 PM
A third of the fans don't want Bent anyway

The poll on the Darren Bent thread would suggest that less than a quarter don't want him.  Personally, I'm baffled as to why even than many of us have taken leave of our senses!

They're probably the same muppets who used to slag off Ashley Young and claimed he could be easily replaced.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 04, 2012, 05:19:42 PM
Here's a rumour about us from Sporting Life:

"Aston Villa are considering a £6m bid for Celtic playmaker Ki Sung-Yueng."

? ? ?

I saw this before but forgot to mention it.  Again, I do not believe this one bit.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TheSandman on January 04, 2012, 05:24:29 PM

Here's a rumour about us from Sporting Life:

"Aston Villa are considering a £6m bid for Celtic playmaker Ki Sung-Yueng."

? ? ?

We were heavily linked with him in the summer.

He's a good player, very creative and has also improved his defensive game. He's won South Korean player of the year just recently ahead of Park from United. However, it is only the SPL so not sure how he would cut it in the premiership and the one I'd want from Celtic's midfield is Kayal though I'd probably rank both as the players in Scotland most likely to make a go of it in England.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JUAN PABLO on January 04, 2012, 05:24:37 PM
Kieron Richardson to Arsenal ?   that would free up money for MON for Collins ;)
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on January 04, 2012, 05:46:02 PM
At the end of the day, if the club don't really want to sell him, they just need to reject any offers.

If we don't, where does this end?

Well if Randy wants to keep selling I say carry on until he's sold the entire club.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JJ-AV on January 04, 2012, 05:54:13 PM
I expect him to go. The tactics don't suit him, we can get similar quality for half the fee we'll receive and we've no money to invest elsewhere.

People say Randy has changed since pre-MON, but I think it's more recent than that. The singings last January and the targets Houllier had lined up suggest money was there then. I think it changed post Houllier's departure.

Maybe having to pay MON compensation was the final straw for Randy.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mister E on January 04, 2012, 06:04:41 PM
I expect him to go. The tactics don't suit him, we can get similar quality for half the fee we'll receive and we've no money to invest elsewhere.
People keep saying that there's "similar" quality out there - who? All I've seen are rumours about Cole and Zamora; hardly setting the pulse racing. All the clubs are after a proven goalscorer - there ain't many out there!

People say Randy has changed since pre-MON, but I think it's more recent than that. The singings last January and the targets Houllier had lined up suggest money was there then. I think it changed post Houllier's departure.
Maybe RL's reluctance to stick with GHou was precisely because of the proposed signings, rather than as you see it. Maybe the money was not available for GHou's 'grand plan'.
Maybe having to pay MON compensation was the final straw for Randy.

Undoubtedly.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Chris Smith on January 04, 2012, 06:45:03 PM
I expect him to go. The tactics don't suit him, we can get similar quality for half the fee we'll receive and we've no money to invest elsewhere.

People say Randy has changed since pre-MON, but I think it's more recent than that. The singings last January and the targets Houllier had lined up suggest money was there then. I think it changed post Houllier's departure.

Maybe having to pay MON compensation was the final straw for Randy.

Signings for the last 18 months have all been in tandem with players going out, nothing has changed. Houllier allegedly lining up some signings is not the same as convincing the board to shell out for them. You're just twisting things to suit your stance.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dave Clark Five on January 04, 2012, 06:49:22 PM
As for the Bent to Liverpool rumour I believe it's media hype from certain Liverpool loving journos. I heard that they only have a budget of £10m and are trying for Jelavic from Rangers, which makes sense considering the dosh they spent in the summer which hasn't got them very far has it?

Here's a rumour about us from Sporting Life:

"Aston Villa are considering a £6m bid for Celtic playmaker Ki Sung-Yueng."

? ? ?


Celtic ace Ki Sung-Yueng a January target for Aston Villa boss Alex McLeish
Jan 4 2012 Exclusive by Keith Jackson


ASTON VILLA boss Alex McLeish is considering a raid on Celtic for South Korean playmaker Ki Sung-Yueng.
Record Sport understands McLeish is a massive admirer of the 22-year-old and has penned Ki’s name on to a list of his top targets for the current transfer window.
McLeish has also been highly impressed by another of Neil Lennon’s midfield lynchpins, Beram Kayal, but believes he has a better chance of luring Ki south this month and has opened talks at Villa Park about piecing together a big-money bid.
The Premiership outfit will not match the kind of cash mega-rich Russians Rubin Kazan were willing to offer for Ki in August when it was rumoured they were ready to weigh in with an £8million bid.
McLeish, though, might be willing to go as high as £6m – not least because of the glowing personal recommendation given to him by his own right-hand man Peter Grant.
Former Hoops coach Grant has endorsed the plan having worked with Ki during his stint as Tony Mowbray’s No.2 at Celtic.
Grant believes the youngster has the ability to become one of the most prestigious talents in England’s top flight and has urged McLeish to make a move.
Ki has replaced Rangers skipper Steve Davis on McLeish’s list of targets. The former Ibrox boss made an official enquiry about Davis at the end of the summer but his interest in the star has cooled.
A source close to the Midlands club said: “Ki and Kayal are the two players in the SPL Alex has been most impressed by.
“He believes Ki might be available in January and is considering a bid but he will not match the money offered by the Russians.”
McLeish is also in Pole position to land Robbie Keane on a two-month loan deal from LA Galaxy, with Celtic also monitoring the hitman’s situation.
Meanwhile, Hoops face a fight to land Baba Diawara after super-rich Chinese club Beijing Guoan entered the race for his signature.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: MonsXI on January 04, 2012, 07:15:22 PM
Ki is a very nice centre mid, surely spell the end for Delph though?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dave Clark Five on January 04, 2012, 07:23:54 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zWCz5Btjr1M&feature=youtube_gdata_player (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zWCz5Btjr1M&feature=youtube_gdata_player)

Looks ok on here. Strikes a ball well.

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Percy McCarthy on January 04, 2012, 07:25:12 PM
Some people wouldn't mind us selling Bent because they don't rate him. It's not 'utter madness' or 'taking leave of their senses', it's an opinion about a player. Harry Redknapp is held in high regard as a judge of players on here, he didn't rate him. Is he mad?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: kippaxvilla2 on January 04, 2012, 07:32:28 PM
On something loosely related, anyone know why Barry didn't take the penalty?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 04, 2012, 08:34:31 PM
I said it when he was on a free in the summer, but we definitely should have signed Ba.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 04, 2012, 08:37:58 PM
I'm guessing that with Gabby, Bent, Fonz and Weimann a striker wasn't top of our list. Plus weren't there some doubts over his longterm fitness?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 04, 2012, 08:39:07 PM
There were, but ever since he came into the Premier League he has looked very good.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Risso on January 04, 2012, 08:40:19 PM
When was the last time we signed a bargain who's gone on to do really well?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: spangley1812 on January 04, 2012, 08:40:36 PM
On something loosely related, anyone know why Barry didn't take the penalty?

He had been sent off 2 minutes before the penalty was awarded
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 04, 2012, 08:40:47 PM
Ridiculously good it has to be said. I think he's up to 16 in 20 now for the barcodes.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 04, 2012, 08:41:27 PM
When was the last time we signed a bargain who's gone on to do really well?

Delaney?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 04, 2012, 08:41:46 PM
Shay Given hopefully! But we should have signed Ba, we only have two senior strikers.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: kippaxvilla2 on January 04, 2012, 08:47:49 PM
When was the last time we signed a bargain who's gone on to do really well?

Delaney?

Najwan Grayib.
Oyvind Leonhardsen.

Ronny Johnson (actually this is sort of true)
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 04, 2012, 08:48:24 PM
Newcastle have several quality bargains, Ba, Tiote, Cabaye, Guitierrez and I expect Santon.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: kippaxvilla2 on January 04, 2012, 08:50:45 PM
There's two things that are more or less certain at Villa.

1.  We won't sign any bargains whatsoever that turn out to be shit hot (Ash and Downey Hair don't count).
2. If we sign a big name, sooner or later they will become shit either as a result of us playing them out of position or just not playing them.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mister E on January 04, 2012, 08:58:54 PM
On something loosely related, anyone know why Barry didn't take the penalty?
yeah, he'd been sent off by then ;)
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mister E on January 04, 2012, 09:02:10 PM
I'm guessing that with Gabby, Bent, Fonz and Weimann a striker wasn't top of our list. Plus weren't there some doubts over his longterm fitness?
Which sort of says it all: 2 proven strikers, one who has had 2 seasons to prove himself off the bench and has not done so, and one that has not been given any sort of opportunity. Oh, and Heskey.
Hope over logic.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on January 04, 2012, 10:02:03 PM
Newcastle have several quality bargains, Ba, Tiote, Cabaye, Guitierrez and I expect Santon.

whoever is head of scouting up there has done a terrific job with much the same resources that Mcleish has been given. I hope that Mcleish is able to pull some rabbits out of his backside in the 20 something days.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Jimmy Smash on January 04, 2012, 10:08:48 PM
So now were looking in admiration at Newcastle's transfer policy. Great.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TheSandman on January 04, 2012, 10:11:16 PM
Why shouldn't we?

If you have fuck all to spend you can at least learn from those who spend fuck all well.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 04, 2012, 10:16:46 PM
So now were looking in admiration at Newcastle's transfer policy. Great.

In fairness they've got quality at low cost, that's ideal isn't it?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Jimmy Smash on January 04, 2012, 10:19:24 PM
I'm not saying its a bad thing. It's just a sad reflection on how things are now, compared to x3 years ago.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: mrfuse on January 04, 2012, 10:20:05 PM
So now were looking in admiration at Newcastle's transfer policy. Great.
In fairness they've got quality at low cost, that's ideal isn't it?

Yep and I have to say I didnt think Pardew was a great signing but then I look at McCleish
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 04, 2012, 10:20:47 PM
I'm not saying its a bad thing. It's just a sad reflection on how things are now, compared to x3 years ago.

Our transfer policy was a bit hit and miss then. Other clubs have played the market better than us for decades.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Jimmy Smash on January 04, 2012, 10:23:09 PM
I'm not saying its a bad thing. It's just a sad reflection on how things are now, compared to x3 years ago.

Our transfer policy was a bit hit and miss then. Other clubs have played the market better than us for decades.

Yeah but you know what... We all felt we were going somewhere.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Davey B on January 04, 2012, 10:23:58 PM
Newcastle have several quality bargains, Ba, Tiote, Cabaye, Guitierrez and I expect Santon.

whoever is head of scouting up there has done a terrific job with much the same resources that Mcleish has been given. I hope that Mcleish is able to pull some rabbits out of his backside in the 20 something days.

You are bang on Toronto. As loathe as I am to say it, they have got a brilliant guy in Graham Carr. He is the father of the TV presnter / commedienne Alan Carr. He really has done a cracking job for them. If i could take one thing / person from their club, Graham Carr is the man to take.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Risso on January 04, 2012, 10:24:38 PM
Shay Given hopefully! But we should have signed Ba, we only have two senior strikers.

I don't think a 5 year contract at his age puts him in the bargain category to be honest.  Delaney was a good shout.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Reuben on January 04, 2012, 10:25:42 PM
Slightly linked but is Glenn Roeder still involved with us?  He was scouting last year wasn't he or did I dream that?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Matt C on January 04, 2012, 10:29:45 PM
That was under Houllier I think.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 04, 2012, 10:30:38 PM
Slightly linked but is Glenn Roeder still involved with us?  He was scouting last year wasn't he or did I dream that?

He was doing some opponent-scouting. I believe some regarded it as The Last Straw.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 04, 2012, 10:33:41 PM
Shay Given hopefully! But we should have signed Ba, we only have two senior strikers.

I don't think a 5 year contract at his age puts him in the bargain category to be honest.  Delaney was a good shout.

Comes to something when the last one I could think of was signed over a decade ago and may well be our last bargain. What a bargain he was though, £250K IIRC.

Would Hitz fall into the bargain category, or was he too unknown as he was signed aged 18 from Bayern's youth team? So more of a punt on youth than catching a bargain?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: luke25 on January 04, 2012, 10:37:01 PM
Barry from Brighton was a bargain, bloody ages ago though.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Matt C on January 04, 2012, 10:38:58 PM
What about Beinlich (sp?) - didn't he go on to be a bit of a star? Not with us obviously.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Risso on January 04, 2012, 10:39:13 PM
Barry from Brighton was a bargain, bloody ages ago though.

He was more of a youth signing though.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Clampy on January 04, 2012, 10:39:54 PM
Despite his injuries, £3.5m for Laursen was well worth paying.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Jimmy Smash on January 04, 2012, 10:40:43 PM
Friedel?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: luke25 on January 04, 2012, 10:41:04 PM
Barry from Brighton was a bargain, bloody ages ago though.

He was more of a youth signing though.
I'm having Laursen then.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 04, 2012, 10:41:28 PM
Barry from Brighton was a bargain, bloody ages ago though.

He was more of a youth signing though.

Sort-of. I think we signed him on pro forms at 17.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Risso on January 04, 2012, 10:43:03 PM
Barry from Brighton was a bargain, bloody ages ago though.

He was more of a youth signing though.

Sort-of. I think we signed him on pro forms at 17.

I thought we'd got him earlier than that.  He made his first team debut for us aged 17 didn't he?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Jimmy Smash on January 04, 2012, 10:43:58 PM
And he's still got the same fucking haircut.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Somniloquism on January 04, 2012, 10:44:15 PM
Barry from Brighton was a bargain, bloody ages ago though.

He was more of a youth signing though.

Sort-of. I think we signed him on pro forms at 17.

He was also potentially quite expensive with all the deals for a "youth teamer" in 97-98.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 04, 2012, 10:44:38 PM
Barry from Brighton was a bargain, bloody ages ago though.

He was more of a youth signing though.

Sort-of. I think we signed him on pro forms at 17.

I thought we'd got him earlier than that.  He made his first team debut for us aged 17 didn't he?

We signed him on the day (or the day before) Brian resigned in February 1998 and he made his debut v Sheffield Wednesday at the end of that season. I still say he's the best 17 year old I've ever see and that includes Brian Little & Sid. 
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 04, 2012, 10:46:40 PM
Personally as much as I liked Laursen I probably wouldn't stick him in the bargain category. Signed for AC Milan in 2004 for £3.5million (what would that equate to now, 5 or 6 mill maybe) so he wasn't an unknown, and he only managed about 80 league games in 5 years.

Great player but not one for the bargain list for me.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Clampy on January 04, 2012, 10:47:24 PM
Barry from Brighton was a bargain, bloody ages ago though.

He was more of a youth signing though.

Sort-of. I think we signed him on pro forms at 17.

I thought we'd got him earlier than that.  He made his first team debut for us aged 17 didn't he?

We signed him on the day (or the day before) Brian resigned in February 1998 and he made his debut v Sheffield Wednesday at the end of that season. I still say he's the best 17 year old I've ever see and that includes Brian Little & Sid. 

I remember that Sheffield Wednesday game, he played centre midfield (i think) and he was superb.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Risso on January 04, 2012, 10:48:34 PM
Barry from Brighton was a bargain, bloody ages ago though.

He was more of a youth signing though.

Sort-of. I think we signed him on pro forms at 17.

I thought we'd got him earlier than that.  He made his first team debut for us aged 17 didn't he?

We signed him on the day (or the day before) Brian resigned in February 1998 and he made his debut v Sheffield Wednesday at the end of that season. I still say he's the best 17 year old I've ever see and that includes Brian Little & Sid. 

That was when he signed his first pro contract.  He actually joined us the year before I think.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: bertlambshank on January 04, 2012, 10:51:11 PM
John Gidman did we pay Liverpool a fee?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on January 04, 2012, 10:52:37 PM
So now were looking in admiration at Newcastle's transfer policy. Great.

there's nothing wrong in acknowledging others if in fact it's justified. Given where they were only a few years back, they've done a great job on the pitch. Just like us they've sold arguably their best players and they've reinvested wisely. In fact, you could go as far as to say that they are somewhat of a model for what all clubs that are below the carefree spending teams should be doing. Selling high and being incredibly astute in the market when replacing those players. This all despite having a complete muppet as their owner.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TheSandman on January 04, 2012, 10:55:03 PM
Slightly linked but is Glenn Roeder still involved with us?  He was scouting last year wasn't he or did I dream that?

He was doing some opponent-scouting. I believe some regarded it as The Last Straw.

As the sadly missed Mark Fletcher memorably put it 'A CV so crap you could catch Weil's Disease from it'.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 04, 2012, 10:56:07 PM

That was when he signed his first pro contract.  He actually joined us the year before I think.

Wikipedia says '97, the Mercury says '98. Both reliable sources.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Jimmy Smash on January 04, 2012, 11:02:03 PM

That was when he signed his first pro contract.  He actually joined us the year before I think.

Wikipedia says '97, the Mercury says '98. Both reliable sources.

Obviously one of them are not that reliable as they have got it wrong!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 04, 2012, 11:03:03 PM

That was when he signed his first pro contract.  He actually joined us the year before I think.

Wikipedia says '97, the Mercury says '98. Both reliable sources.

Obviously one of them are not that reliable as they have got it wrong!

That should be 'reliable'. It may be 1997, I don't know for sure but I always thought he signed pro straight from Brighton.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Risso on January 04, 2012, 11:08:06 PM
Nope, I was right definitely 1997:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2007/mar/18/newsstory.sport
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 04, 2012, 11:10:46 PM
I thought it was '97 when we signed Barry.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Somniloquism on January 04, 2012, 11:10:57 PM

That was when he signed his first pro contract.  He actually joined us the year before I think.

Wikipedia says '97, the Mercury says '98. Both reliable sources.

Obviously one of them are not that reliable as they have got it wrong!

That should be 'reliable'. It may be 1997, I don't know for sure but I always thought he signed pro straight from Brighton.

I always thought we were mainly after Standing and Barry was also purchased to keep him company. Then it turned out he was the better player, (with a less moany mum/aunt/female relative).
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 04, 2012, 11:11:16 PM
Nope, I was right definitely 1997:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2007/mar/18/newsstory.sport

That really is news to me. Thanks for that.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: kippaxvilla2 on January 04, 2012, 11:18:51 PM
Surely at £400k the bargain of the last two centuries was God.

Otherwise, Mark Lillis.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 04, 2012, 11:20:08 PM
Surely at £400k the bargain of the last two centuries was God.

Otherwise, Mark Lillis.

George Graham for £5k. Pity it was us doing the selling.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Matt C on January 04, 2012, 11:31:56 PM
QPR bid £3m for Collins according to The Mirror:
http://t.co/l8zFG5Nr
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: midnite on January 04, 2012, 11:39:46 PM
That's a bit different from the £5-8 million knocked about yesterday ha!!

Suppose it's the starting bid price
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 04, 2012, 11:42:05 PM
What about Beinlich (sp?) - didn't he go on to be a bit of a star? Not with us obviously.

i went to the reserve game when him and Breitkreutz made their debuts.

I thought Beinlich looked gash, but Breitkreutz looked fucking brilliant.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 04, 2012, 11:43:50 PM
That's a bit different from the £5-8 million knocked about yesterday ha!!

Suppose it's the starting bid price

Whichever it is, it's acceptable.

Him and Heskey are two players I'd love to see make an exit this window.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Somniloquism on January 04, 2012, 11:48:09 PM
What about Beinlich (sp?) - didn't he go on to be a bit of a star? Not with us obviously.

i went to the reserve game when him and Breitkreutz made their debuts.

I thought Beinlich looked gash, but Breitkreutz looked fucking brilliant.

Was that a reserve game, thought is was an early cup game but that was my opinion as well when I saw them.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on January 04, 2012, 11:49:27 PM
When was the last time we signed a bargain who's gone on to do really well?

Not sure if they have been mentioned, but in my lifetime Platt and Yorke are at the top. £200,000 for the pair. What joy they brought us.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 04, 2012, 11:51:22 PM
What about Beinlich (sp?) - didn't he go on to be a bit of a star? Not with us obviously.

i went to the reserve game when him and Breitkreutz made their debuts.

I thought Beinlich looked gash, but Breitkreutz looked fucking brilliant.

Was that a reserve game, thought is was an early cup game but that was my opinion as well when I saw them.

Definitely a reserve game. I've only ever been to a handful.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Somniloquism on January 04, 2012, 11:54:46 PM
i went to the reserve game when him and Breitkreutz made their debuts.

I thought Beinlich looked gash, but Breitkreutz looked fucking brilliant.

Was that a reserve game, thought is was an early cup game but that was my opinion as well when I saw them.

Definitely a reserve game. I've only ever been to a handful.

I pretty much used to go to any home game in those days of first ST ownership, just couldn't remember which one I saw them in.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 04, 2012, 11:55:20 PM
They came over for a reserve game when they first signed, when Beinlich looked the better. They then went back home to finalise the deal, and on their return Breikreutz always looked better. Back in Germany Beinlich did more. 
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on January 04, 2012, 11:57:55 PM
Mebbe one of the mods could transfer this thread to the villa memories section then we could all reminisce when we bought bargains. Or Anyone. Either way we need a new thread entitled "Aston Villa Firesale - Everything must go"
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on January 05, 2012, 12:00:38 AM
Mebbe one of the mods could transfer this thread to the villa memories section then we could all reminisce when we bought bargains. Or Anyone. Either way we need a new thread entitled "Aston Villa Firesale - Everything must go"

Have your sources told you we're selling loads of players then Greg?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: villan1975 on January 05, 2012, 12:00:58 AM
Mebbe one of the mods could transfer this thread to the villa memories section then we could all reminisce when we bought bargains. Or Anyone. Either way we need a new thread entitled "Aston Villa Firesale - Everything must go"
You won't be saying that if Robbie Keane rocks up at Villa Park.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JJ-AV on January 05, 2012, 12:03:10 AM
I'd love Collins to go.

He's a decent player when fit and firing, but exactly the type of footballer I'd like to see the Villa steer away from signing.

I'd take Bassong, been a bit dodgy for Spurs but was class at Newcastle. Pacey, good on the ball and naturally left-sided. Can cover left back and I believe he's mates (or even related to) N'Zogbia. They might be decent down the wing together.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on January 05, 2012, 12:04:10 AM
Mebbe one of the mods could transfer this thread to the villa memories section then we could all reminisce when we bought bargains. Or Anyone. Either way we need a new thread entitled "Aston Villa Firesale - Everything must go"

Have your sources told you we're selling loads of players then Greg?


we have to sell  to buy so logically that means someone's off
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 05, 2012, 12:05:48 AM
I prefer to look at it as buying to sell.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on January 05, 2012, 12:08:47 AM
Mebbe one of the mods could transfer this thread to the villa memories section then we could all reminisce when we bought bargains. Or Anyone. Either way we need a new thread entitled "Aston Villa Firesale - Everything must go"
You won't be saying that if Robbie Keane rocks up at Villa Park.


aye. It will be like a new Back to the Future where Marty's turned up in 1998
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JJ-AV on January 05, 2012, 12:09:43 AM
Goal are linking us to Drogba.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 05, 2012, 12:10:32 AM
Shoot are linking us to Steve bull.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: KevinGage on January 05, 2012, 12:12:08 AM
What about Beinlich (sp?) - didn't he go on to be a bit of a star? Not with us obviously.

i went to the reserve game when him and Breitkreutz made their debuts.

I thought Beinlich looked gash, but Breitkreutz looked fucking brilliant.

Breitkreutz got a few games just past the midway point of either the 1991/92 or 1992/93 season IIRC.  Thought he looked like a talent. 

Every corner he fizzed in was dangerous and I seem to recall him nutmegging his marker a few times and generally making him look like a mug. Might have either been Norwich or Everton at home.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: eamonn on January 05, 2012, 12:12:59 AM
Do we get any of the £7m Cahill fee? 20% of the 2m profit or something? Buttons but it keeps Beye warm against the Doncaster cold for a few more weeks.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TheSandman on January 05, 2012, 12:16:47 AM
Shoot are linking us to Steve bull.

Somewhere I have an old Shoot annual where the front cover bears the legendary headline 'Gould: Ndlovu is Better than Giggs'.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on January 05, 2012, 12:17:48 AM
the keane deal seems stupidity especially from the "wage bill is too high" angle. If the problem is the wages why are we willing to spend 250k minimum for his wages for 2 months. Unless the whole wages thing is bullshit. Now there's a thought....
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 05, 2012, 12:20:03 AM
the keane deal seems stupidity especially from the "wage bill is too high" angle. If the problem is the wages why are we willing to spend 250k minimum for his wages for 2 months. Unless the whole wages thing is bullshit. Now there's a thought....

I honestly don't see the thinking in getting Keane. Hes a two month obligation, but it is still money.

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 05, 2012, 12:22:14 AM
the keane deal seems stupidity especially from the "wage bill is too high" angle. If the problem is the wages why are we willing to spend 250k minimum for his wages for 2 months. Unless the whole wages thing is bullshit. Now there's a thought....

I honestly don't see the thinking in getting Keane. Hes a two month obligation, but it is still money.



Then again, if his goals keep us up ........ 

*whistly fella*
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on January 05, 2012, 12:23:23 AM
yep its just mental unless someone is off.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: KevinGage on January 05, 2012, 12:32:37 AM
Mebbe one of the mods could transfer this thread to the villa memories section then we could all reminisce when we bought bargains. Or Anyone. Either way we need a new thread entitled "Aston Villa Firesale - Everything must go"
You won't be saying that if Robbie Keane rocks up at Villa Park.


aye. It will be like a new Back to the Future where Marty's turned up in 1998

Goals?  Where we're going, we don't need goals.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on January 05, 2012, 12:45:44 AM
Mebbe one of the mods could transfer this thread to the villa memories section then we could all reminisce when we bought bargains. Or Anyone. Either way we need a new thread entitled "Aston Villa Firesale - Everything must go"
You won't be saying that if Robbie Keane rocks up at Villa Park.


aye. It will be like a new Back to the Future where Marty's turned up in 1998

Goals?  Where we're going, we don't need goals.


heheheh

Dear Robbie, On the night I travel back in time you will  sign for Villa. Please do whatever is necessary to prevent this terrible tragedy from occurring. Your friend, Marty.
[Writes the words "Do not open until 2012" on the envelope]
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: villadelph on January 05, 2012, 06:08:52 AM
I like the Ki-Sung Yeung speculation. I think he's a good central midfielder that could thrive in the Prem. He's confident on the ball and very composed, he has a great eye for long passes on the floor and has a hell of a shot. I'd take Wanyama too.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: eastie on January 05, 2012, 07:07:06 AM
What a pity we seem to waste money on below par under performing players while newcastle seem to have scouts who can pick up gems on the cheap ,ba, ben arta,cabaye, etc are top top players who cost a fraction on some of our so called stars.

Oh for the days when we could pick up a hungry dwight yorke or shaun teale etc on the cheap.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: brontebilly on January 05, 2012, 07:50:53 AM
As long as we bought a good replacement it wouldn't bother me if Collins left. I'm sick of seeing him hoof the ball up the pitch.

He is still a pretty solid defender though. Crap on the ball and a bit brainless at the best of times but I don't think he is as bad as some here are making out. The likes of Onouha are no better on the ball. We should keep him until the summer anyway.

Depressing times to be a Villa supporter. We are the epitome of mediocrity and all ambition has been stripped bone dry from the club.

5 year plan cheers Lerner.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on January 05, 2012, 08:21:57 AM
Chelsea, Aston Villa and Malaga are reportedly keeping an eye on out-of-favour Borussia Dortmund striker Lucas Barrios.


Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dave on January 05, 2012, 08:39:34 AM
Big 'yes please' to Barrios.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: garyshawsknee on January 05, 2012, 08:53:49 AM
Kendrick just tweeted that talks with Galaxy going well,Keane could be in line to make debut against Everton....ye gods.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 05, 2012, 09:21:53 AM
Kendrick just tweeted that talks with Galaxy going well,Keane could be in line to make debut against Everton....ye gods.

I saw that this morning too.  Surely with him coming in, someone will be going out?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on January 05, 2012, 09:27:11 AM
Kendrick just tweeted that talks with Galaxy going well,Keane could be in line to make debut against Everton....ye gods.

I saw that this morning too.  Surely with him coming in, someone will be going out?

the fans?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 05, 2012, 09:28:32 AM
Maybe Greg.
QPR have reportedly bid £3m for Collins.  I think we can demand a little than that.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on January 05, 2012, 09:30:13 AM
dunno. don't want to risk him staying by overpricing him.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: andrew08 on January 05, 2012, 09:42:28 AM
dunno. don't want to risk him staying by overpricing him.

lol and agree.

It's not about the cost or resale value of players though is it, don't we just want to reduce the wage bill percentages against turnover ? I would assume then that evey player sold means we're buying another.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 05, 2012, 09:45:32 AM
I don't know much about Ki-Sung Yeung, but from what I've heard he seems to be the type we should be targeting.  Young-ish, but not so young he couldn't come in and play straight away, good ability and from a league below PL standard, so the fee and wages are manageable.  Players sub 25 years old for £5-10m is the way we can build again.

As for Collins, I'd be amazed if he went for £3m.  Take away your own personal views of him for a minute, but we're talking about a CB starting regularly in the PL, and an international, who's still only 28.  We'll get at least the £5m back we paid for him. 
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pedro25 on January 05, 2012, 09:49:19 AM
I thought Cahill was off for £8mill, in that case £3mill for Collins is great for us.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 05, 2012, 09:58:31 AM
I would love 5 million back on Collins, he is so quick to hoof the ball it gets depressing. QPR can afford 6 million. More worryingly though, the Daily Mail article says he is in talks over a 2 year contract extension! Yikes.


As for Keane - 750k for 6 matches. If we have trouble with our wage bill then that is complete and utter insanity and Paul Faulkner as CEO should be putting the kybosh on it!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 05, 2012, 10:00:36 AM
I thought Cahill was off for £8mill, in that case £3mill for Collins is great for us.

Cahill's going for £7m and if Collins also had 6 months left on his contract I'd take the £3m.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 05, 2012, 10:02:30 AM
I would love 5 million back on Collins, he is so quick to hoof the ball it gets depressing. QPR can afford 6 million. More worryingly though, the Daily Mail article says he is in talks over a 2 year contract extension! Yikes.


As for Keane - 750k for 6 matches. If we have trouble with our wage bill then that is complete and utter insanity and Paul Faulkner as CEO should be putting the kybosh on it!

Yep insanity.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 05, 2012, 10:02:52 AM
As for Keane - 750k for 6 matches. If we have trouble with our wage bill then that is complete and utter insanity and Paul Faulkner as CEO should be putting the kybosh on it!

Is that right - where did you hear it?

He's reportedly on £35k a week in America, so even if we're paying it all, which I doubt we are, then for 2 months that's only £280k.  I know there will be a loan fee and insurance costs involved, but even then I can't see £750k being right? 
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 05, 2012, 10:05:31 AM
£750k does sound a bit excessive for 2 months.  That surely cant be right
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 05, 2012, 10:09:43 AM
Apparently, Josh McEachran will be deciding within the next 24hrs whether he wants to come to villa or swansea on loan.  I dont really know much about him, what is his natural position?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 05, 2012, 10:11:14 AM
As for Keane - 750k for 6 matches. If we have trouble with our wage bill then that is complete and utter insanity and Paul Faulkner as CEO should be putting the kybosh on it!

Is that right - where did you hear it?

He's reportedly on £35k a week in America, so even if we're paying it all, which I doubt we are, then for 2 months that's only £280k.  I know there will be a loan fee and insurance costs involved, but even then I can't see £750k being right? 

Loan fee and insurance bump according to Kendrick in the mail. It is ridiculous amounts!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: luke25 on January 05, 2012, 10:11:41 AM
Apparently, Josh McEachran will be deciding within the next 24hrs whether he wants to come to villa or swansea on loan.  I dont really know much about him, what is his natural position?
The bench.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: toplad4u on January 05, 2012, 10:14:23 AM
goal.com running an exclusive were gona bid for Drogba! just imagine it heskey certainly off! If he would drop his wages to 80,000 a week and take a hefty sign on fee I certainly take him! Maybe there will be a few surprises this transfer window and its false were not willing to spend big but just more sensibly now on the right players.

goal.com/en/news/596/exclusive/2012/01/04/2831012/aston-villa-make-sensational-move-for-chelseas-didier-drogba?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 05, 2012, 10:17:39 AM
goal.com running an exclusive were gona bid for Drogba! just imagine it heskey certainly off! If he would drop his wages to 80,000 a week and take a hefty sign on fee I certainly take him! Maybe there will be a few surprises this transfer window and its false were not willing to spend big but just more sensibly now on the right players.

goal.com/en/news/596/exclusive/2012/01/04/2831012/aston-villa-make-sensational-move-for-chelseas-didier-drogba?

Saw this nonsense on twitter yesterday and also on the ladbrookes news website.  This will never happen in a million years so lets not even get remotely excitied about it.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 05, 2012, 10:20:08 AM
As for Keane - 750k for 6 matches. If we have trouble with our wage bill then that is complete and utter insanity and Paul Faulkner as CEO should be putting the kybosh on it!

Is that right - where did you hear it?

He's reportedly on £35k a week in America, so even if we're paying it all, which I doubt we are, then for 2 months that's only £280k.  I know there will be a loan fee and insurance costs involved, but even then I can't see £750k being right? 

Loan fee and insurance bump according to Kendrick in the mail. It is ridiculous amounts!

He says between £500k and £750k, but then in another part of the same article:-

Villa’s loan swoop for Robbie Keane is in the balance as the club weigh up whether a two-month deal costing up to a quarter-of-a-million pounds would be value for money.

http://www.birminghammail.net/birmingham-sport/aston-villa-fc/aston-villa-news/2012/01/05/aston-villa-transfer-update-robbie-keane-deal-is-in-the-balance-no-move-for-tottenham-star-97319-30064204/

Seems to be a bit conflicting, but if it is £750k or near it I'd so it's not worth the money.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: placeforparks on January 05, 2012, 10:20:46 AM
500k for robbie keane is desperate. what is the point? he struggled the past 2 seasons in the premier league and he's not exactly 'box office' is he?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 05, 2012, 10:21:18 AM
next they will be writing that villa are in for a double swoop for Lampard and Drogba
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 05, 2012, 10:39:52 AM
As for Keane - 750k for 6 matches. If we have trouble with our wage bill then that is complete and utter insanity and Paul Faulkner as CEO should be putting the kybosh on it!

Is that right - where did you hear it?

He's reportedly on £35k a week in America, so even if we're paying it all, which I doubt we are, then for 2 months that's only £280k.  I know there will be a loan fee and insurance costs involved, but even then I can't see £750k being right? 

Loan fee and insurance bump according to Kendrick in the mail. It is ridiculous amounts!

That would amount to gross negligence from the board to sanction that, utter utter madness. So we try and control wage bill and do something idiotic like this.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SheffieldVillain on January 05, 2012, 10:41:06 AM
As for Keane - 750k for 6 matches. If we have trouble with our wage bill then that is complete and utter insanity and Paul Faulkner as CEO should be putting the kybosh on it!

Is that right - where did you hear it?

He's reportedly on £35k a week in America, so even if we're paying it all, which I doubt we are, then for 2 months that's only £280k.  I know there will be a loan fee and insurance costs involved, but even then I can't see £750k being right? 

Loan fee and insurance bump according to Kendrick in the mail. It is ridiculous amounts!

That would amount to gross negligence from the board to sanction that, utter utter madness. So we try and control wage bill and do something idiotic like this.

I'd have to agree. Unless we're getting rid of Heskey's £60k from the wage bill and replacing him with Keane for two months. In which case it's a bloody good idea.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithe on January 05, 2012, 10:46:17 AM
I like the Ki-Sung Yeung speculation. I think he's a good central midfielder that could thrive in the Prem. He's confident on the ball and very composed, he has a great eye for long passes on the floor and has a hell of a shot. I'd take Wanyama too.

I'd like to see him sign on the pitch with an Austin Montego driving round with his photo on the top like this one.

(http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/j/MSNBC/Components/Photo/_new/111228_kim_funeral_car.photoblog600.jpg)
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 05, 2012, 10:48:33 AM
I like the Ki-Sung Yeung speculation. I think he's a good central midfielder that could thrive in the Prem. He's confident on the ball and very composed, he has a great eye for long passes on the floor and has a hell of a shot. I'd take Wanyama too.

Wanyama turned us down to go Celtic so cant see that happening any time soon
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: garyshawsknee on January 05, 2012, 11:12:18 AM
Isn't Drogba off to Africa for a month or so? Or has he retired?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 05, 2012, 11:21:26 AM
Isn't Drogba off to Africa for a month or so? Or has he retired?

He's defo off to africa for the tournament out there.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Merv on January 05, 2012, 11:29:37 AM
Apparently, Josh McEachran will be deciding within the next 24hrs whether he wants to come to villa or swansea on loan.  I dont really know much about him, what is his natural position?
The bench.

Exactly. Forget about Keane, who could do a short-term job for us. Really don't understand going in for McEachran, a young central midfielder, when we have enough young central midfielders as it is... Swansea interest, with Brendan Rogers' Chelsea background, makes more sense.

BTW, a colleague of mine - Leicester City season ticket holder - claimed yesterday we'd offered £6m for Andy King, which I dismissed as idle gossip.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Duncan Shaw on January 05, 2012, 11:36:50 AM
Wasn't £500k the extra amount we wouldn't pay Wolves for Keane back in the day?
Oh the irony........
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: cheltenhamlion on January 05, 2012, 11:37:39 AM
If we signed McEachran, his position would be right in the way of Gary Gardner. Why give their players experience at the expense of our own?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulTheVillan on January 05, 2012, 11:53:18 AM
I thought Cahill was off for £8mill, in that case £3mill for Collins is great for us.

Cahill's going for £7m and if Collins also had 6 months left on his contract I'd take the £3m.

Collins has 18 months left
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on January 05, 2012, 11:54:55 AM
As for Keane - 750k for 6 matches. If we have trouble with our wage bill then that is complete and utter insanity and Paul Faulkner as CEO should be putting the kybosh on it!

Is that right - where did you hear it?

He's reportedly on £35k a week in America, so even if we're paying it all, which I doubt we are, then for 2 months that's only £280k.  I know there will be a loan fee and insurance costs involved, but even then I can't see £750k being right? 

Loan fee and insurance bump according to Kendrick in the mail. It is ridiculous amounts!

He says between £500k and £750k, but then in another part of the same article:-

Villa’s loan swoop for Robbie Keane is in the balance as the club weigh up whether a two-month deal costing up to a quarter-of-a-million pounds would be value for money.

http://www.birminghammail.net/birmingham-sport/aston-villa-fc/aston-villa-news/2012/01/05/aston-villa-transfer-update-robbie-keane-deal-is-in-the-balance-no-move-for-tottenham-star-97319-30064204/

Seems to be a bit conflicting, but if it is £750k or near it I'd so it's not worth the money.

Thing is if we are going to analyze every transfer in that manner, then the £4m we paid for Harewood after insurance, agents, signing bonus etc etc was more like £6m, and Darren Bent was probably initially £22m or thereabouts. My point being that with any transfer it's never just about the transfer fee or reported wage. There's always going to be hidden amounts that are never disclosed or taken into initial consideration. Taking a player on loan means that there is no commitment beyond the end of the deal. That, I imagine to the club as they are sorting out the house is more important than what might appear an inflated short term amount.

The one other thing to consider is that this is PL football we a talking about. They are all overpaid, and whether any deals we do in January are short or long term, we'll always be discussing the club shelling out stupid money.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 05, 2012, 12:02:02 PM
I agree with your general point, Toronto, but when weighing up a deal the club should be looking at the overall cost and not just the headline transfer fee.  £750k for 2 months of Robbie Keane is too much, IMO.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 05, 2012, 12:03:18 PM
I agree with your general point, Toronto, but when weighing up a deal the club should be looking at the overall cost and not just the headline transfer fee.  £750k for 2 months of Robbie Keane is too much, IMO.

Indeed.

That is, after all, what they've been telling us for a while now - it isn't just the transfer fee, it is about the wage bill.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Fernando Partridge on January 05, 2012, 12:10:57 PM
If we signed McEachran, his position would be right in the way of Gary Gardner. Why give their players experience at the expense of our own?

I agree totally theres no need to bring him in (unless we are buying the player) Gardner is as good if not better . i'd rather have us loan Gael Kakuta. Essentially we are developing other clubs talents- walker last season from spurs for example and we only reap short term benefits
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 05, 2012, 12:13:29 PM
I will be annoyed if Gardner is knocked down the pecking order by McEachran.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Fernando Partridge on January 05, 2012, 12:28:28 PM
Keane and Drogba up front would be amazing .....in 2007!
Andy Johnson would be better signing than either
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 05, 2012, 12:31:49 PM
Looking at the lad linked from Celtic, at his age, with his reputation it would be a decent punt for 5 million or so. Exactly the age and type we should be after. Not 34 year old Drogba and 31 year old Keane. Would you pay 120k a game for Robbie Keane, which is what we would be doing? No chance.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pedro25 on January 05, 2012, 12:33:53 PM
Centre mid we have plenty of young options with Clark, Gardner, Herd, Bannan and Delph, with Petrov, Ireland and Makoun (from next season onwards) as experienced options.  Out wide we have just N'Zogbia and Albrighton, so I think a wideman is more of a priority.  Someone like Kakuta on loan would be fine or Hoillett on a permanent deal would be superb.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JJ-AV on January 05, 2012, 12:41:08 PM
Diame and Samba.

If Bent goes to Liverpool, I'd give Drogba his 2.5 year contract too.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 05, 2012, 12:44:10 PM
Diame and Samba.

Suggestion, speculation or ITK?

I think they'd both be good additions to stiffen up the spine of the side and hopefully return us to some form of defensive strength.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Fernando Partridge on January 05, 2012, 12:49:08 PM
For attacking wide players i think the Swiss player Shaqiri would be excellent signing but highly unlikely but I think Bragas Hélder Barbosa could be gettable. Scores quality goals against Birmingham too!!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JJ-AV on January 05, 2012, 12:51:16 PM
Suggestion.

Samba would be pricey. £15m+ now, but get the groundwork in for the Summer when they go down.

Diame is on a free. Sort a deal with him for the Summer and they'll sell him on the cheap.

He messed up a bit the other night too, but Figueroa is a good, attacking left back, I think.

Given
Hutton - Samba - Dunne - Figueroa
Diame - Petrov - Ireland
N'Zogbia - Drogba - Gabby

Selling Bent and Collins would see us about even. Before factoring in Cuellar, Beye, Heskey going etc.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 05, 2012, 12:53:06 PM
Diame and Samba.

If Bent goes to Liverpool, I'd give Drogba his 2.5 year contract too.

I think a 2.5 year contract for Drogba would be nuts, he'd want big wages and is pretty injury prone.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 05, 2012, 12:55:09 PM
Drogba cough Ginola cough....
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JJ-AV on January 05, 2012, 12:58:59 PM
If you believe media reports, he supposedly wants 100k a week for 2 years (starting from this Summer).

Again, media reports suggest Bent is on 80k per week. I know this is very rough, but £26m in and 20k p/w extra over 2 years would leave us with about 23.5m left to invest in the squad elsewhere to break even.

I just don't think we should totally discount selling him. Even though I do not want him to be sold, I could see the board and McLeish deciding it's the best option.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 05, 2012, 12:59:47 PM
Spurs have been linked heavily with Samba and Hoillet.  Now, if you were either one of those players who would you choose?  Spurs or Villa?  A club challenging for the league and most likely playing CL football next season or a club who have no direction at the mo apart from heading downwards, no ambition and have no clue?
Simply choice really. Villa all the way! ;-)
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 05, 2012, 01:10:39 PM
Suggestion.

Samba would be pricey. £15m+ now, but get the groundwork in for the Summer when they go down.

Diame is on a free. Sort a deal with him for the Summer and they'll sell him on the cheap.

He messed up a bit the other night too, but Figueroa is a good, attacking left back, I think.

Given
Hutton - Samba - Dunne - Figueroa
Diame - Petrov - Ireland
N'Zogbia - Drogba - Gabby

Selling Bent and Collins would see us about even. Before factoring in Cuellar, Beye, Heskey going etc.

When Spurs were linked with Samba recently I'm sure it was for a lot less than £15m.  I also think Alex might be gettable from Chelsea.  I'd like either and then play Clark in midfield, who drops back incase of injury/suspension to a CB with Herd then coming in.  I can't see either fullback being changed as we'll try to work with them and get more out of them, as evidenced by us looking at cheap back ups in the shape of Stevens and that Nigerian RB we have on trial.

Diame or similar is needed in the centre though, with Ireland hopefully eventually giving way to Gardner.

The top of the pitch is most interesting as I think we'd be mad to sell Bent, which leaves the head scratcher of where we fit Gabby in.  I think the 4-2-3-1 is the way to go, so that would mean some rotation between Gabby, N'zogbia and Albrighton for the wide positions, with Gabby playing up top when Bent isn't available.

Given

Hutton
Alex/Samba
Dunne
Warnock

Clark
Diame

CNZ/Super Marc
Gardner/Ireland
Gabby

Bent

Subs:  Guzan, Stevens, Carlos or Collins (one should stay for experienced back up), Petrov, Herd, Bannan, Weimann.       
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 05, 2012, 01:14:54 PM
To be honest if I were a player like Hoillett or Samba I wouldn't choose to go to Villa. We have shown absolutely no ambition of late and appear very much in the decline.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 05, 2012, 01:15:18 PM
If you believe media reports, he supposedly wants 100k a week for 2 years (starting from this Summer).

Again, media reports suggest Bent is on 80k per week. I know this is very rough, but £26m in and 20k p/w extra over 2 years would leave us with about 23.5m left to invest in the squad elsewhere to break even.

I just don't think we should totally discount selling him. Even though I do not want him to be sold, I could see the board and McLeish deciding it's the best option.

It'd still be £10m of the club's money paid to a 34 year old player - just can't see it happening.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Chris Jameson on January 05, 2012, 01:19:10 PM
Kieron Dyer in a head to toe body cast and hooked up to a life support machine seen having a medical at Bodymoor Heath today.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mister E on January 05, 2012, 01:29:12 PM
Apparently, Josh McEachran will be deciding within the next 24hrs whether he wants to come to villa or swansea on loan.  I dont really know much about him, what is his natural position?
This is insanity with the kids we have. He brings virtually no experience with him so why 'blood' him for Chels?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mister E on January 05, 2012, 01:32:03 PM
Drogba cough Ginola cough....
Seasonal illness, Ozz?

What madness to bring in someone like Drogba whom Chelsea have had trouble motivating.
If we are wanting to run the club on strict financial lines, then you have to invest in younger playeres with some resale. End of.
Bringing in the likes of Drogba runs completely contrary to what we're being told.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mister E on January 05, 2012, 01:33:57 PM
Suggestion.

Samba would be pricey. £15m+ now, but get the groundwork in for the Summer when they go down.

Diame is on a free. Sort a deal with him for the Summer and they'll sell him on the cheap.

He messed up a bit the other night too, but Figueroa is a good, attacking left back, I think.

Given
Hutton - Samba - Dunne - Figueroa
Diame - Petrov - Ireland
N'Zogbia - Drogba - Gabby

Selling Bent and Collins would see us about even. Before factoring in Cuellar, Beye, Heskey going etc.
But hang on a minute: I thought the club had decided not to go spend on new players! I can't see 4 established P'ship players coming into the squad anytime soon.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 05, 2012, 01:44:51 PM
Drogba cough Ginola cough....
Seasonal illness, Ozz?

What madness to bring in someone like Drogba whom Chelsea have had trouble motivating.
If we are wanting to run the club on strict financial lines, then you have to invest in younger playeres with some resale. End of.
Bringing in the likes of Drogba runs completely contrary to what we're being told.

I think so mate, the ghost of christmas past might have given it too me, some french winger who our manager at the time described as a bit porky I seem to recall. This never works for Villa, and unless it is a pro as brilliant as someone like Gullit was when he went to Chelsea, it won't come off and will create resentment. I can see the argument, but if Drogba was all there and firing, he would get the 2 year deal at Chelsea he is so good.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: KevinGage on January 05, 2012, 01:45:46 PM
Instead of 750k for Robbie Keane and whatever wages McEachran might request, I'd be more inclined to go for a player like Maynard at Bristol City.

For one thing, he'd be ours.

For another, he'd see the club as a step up.   Not a temporary training camp, or a place to get a bit of match fitness.

There is always a gamble with players coming from the lower divisions.  But if it works out you save a fortune.  Even if he turns out to be a Beckford, he's young enough to ensure that we still get some of our money back.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 05, 2012, 01:53:32 PM
I am with you Kevin. France, Holland and our own lower leagues provide enough players at the 20-25 bracket at a decent price that are worth the gamble.

McEachran and Keane.. you can hear the barrel being scrapped. I thought Montgomerie had come in as chief scout, surely he can find better than this? A 20 year old Arteta would be good!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Merv on January 05, 2012, 02:05:50 PM
When Spurs were linked with Samba recently I'm sure it was for a lot less than £15m.  I also think Alex might be gettable from Chelsea.       

I agree, John. I'd be stunned if anyone paid £10m for Samba, let alone £15m. And I rate Alex, too. It's just that he's yet another good CB who's looked vulnerable alongside John Terry (hang on.... penny drops......)

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: charlie on January 05, 2012, 02:06:22 PM
Keane.. rather not
Drogbaaaa.... old lazy difficult.. no
Macechran.... why, we have young midfielders needing experience why help Chelsea
Maynard.. why not, Fonz to Bristol City for season as part of deal, or better since they already have David James why not offer experience up front as part of the deal?????
Then they would have a plan B
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Simon Ward on January 05, 2012, 02:14:03 PM
I'm sure it has been asked before but Robbie Keane, why?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 05, 2012, 02:21:08 PM
It seems that Mcleish is adopting the O'Neill approach to transfers, British Isles only.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithe on January 05, 2012, 02:24:52 PM
It seems that Mcleish is adopting the O'Neill approach to transfers, British Isles only.

Not so sure about that, he bought plenty of foreign players for that lot. Not that any of them were any good mind.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 05, 2012, 02:26:15 PM
Ah true, but as yet he hasn't given any signs of doing that for us. Hopefully he will spread the net a lot lot wider, and we'll get value for money and quality.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Risso on January 05, 2012, 02:32:54 PM
Are people really turning their noses up at Drogba?  Not that he'd come here anyway.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 05, 2012, 02:33:59 PM
Are people really turning their noses up at Drogba?  Not that he'd come here anyway.

Yes, i'd be surprised if people weren't.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 05, 2012, 02:35:03 PM
It seems that Mcleish is adopting the O'Neill approach to transfers, British Isles only.

To be fair he's only bought three players so far, so hardly enough to draw any conclusions from.  Houllier was widely beleived to be our saviour in terms of foreign scouting, yet of his 4 signings (Pires, Walker, Makoun & Bent) only one was from overseas.  He probably would have spread the bet further had he stayed, but it's quality not country or origin that's important anyway!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 05, 2012, 02:36:15 PM
bad news chaps,  according to Tom Ross, Eck has said Robbie Keane is the only bit of business he expects to be doing this transfer window.  He should be signed by next week before the Everton game.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: fredm on January 05, 2012, 02:38:32 PM
To be honest if I were a player like Hoillett or Samba I wouldn't choose to go to Villa. We have shown absolutely no ambition of late and appear very much in the decline.

Spot on.  Any player in the PL who has any ambition is not going to even look at Villa. Why should they?  A manager who has relegations on his CV.  An owner who is Mr Invisible who is looking to recover whatever money he can.  And a crowd who seem to boo the team off every other match.  Why should they want to come to VP?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithe on January 05, 2012, 02:44:01 PM
yet of his 4 signings (Pires, Walker, Makoun & Bent) only one was from overseas. 

Half of them surely?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on January 05, 2012, 02:48:15 PM
bad news chaps,  according to Tom Ross, Eck has said Robbie Keane is the only bit of business he expects to be doing this transfer window.  He should be signed by next week before the Everton game.

McLeish also said that they would trade carefully. If someone leaves then I expect that the situation changes again. The market only just opened so to be that definitive this early is premature, in my opinion.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Marlon From Bearwood on January 05, 2012, 02:49:08 PM
bad news chaps,  according to Tom Ross, Eck has said Robbie Keane is the only bit of business he expects to be doing this transfer window.  He should be signed by next week before the Everton game.

Wasn't Tom Ross adament that we were siging Michael Owen last year?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 05, 2012, 02:53:14 PM
yet of his 4 signings (Pires, Walker, Makoun & Bent) only one was from overseas. 

Half of them surely?

Pires had been out of contract for a few months and was training with Arsenal to stay fit.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 05, 2012, 02:54:05 PM
I would expect it to be all that happens without someone going out and balancing the wagebill.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: E I Adio on January 05, 2012, 02:59:12 PM
It seems that Mcleish is adopting the O'Neill approach to transfers, British Isles only.

N'Zogbia's British?

Zoot alors!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 05, 2012, 03:08:33 PM
yet of his 4 signings (Pires, Walker, Makoun & Bent) only one was from overseas. 

Half of them surely?

I'm classing it as British based as opposed to British born.  The argument was that MON hardly ever looked for cheaper foreign players to bring to this country for the first time, putting PL experience highest on his list of attributes.  On that criteria, only Makoun counts as a 'non MON type' signing. 
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on January 05, 2012, 03:28:38 PM
to be fair 1  foreign based player in 4 isn't a terrible percentage . its when it was 2 in 30+ under MON that you realised there was some phobia at play.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 05, 2012, 03:30:25 PM
It seems that Mcleish is adopting the O'Neill approach to transfers, British Isles only.

N'Zogbia's British?

Zoot alors!

Who play for teams in the British Isles.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TheSandman on January 05, 2012, 04:34:05 PM
At least with Drogba there would be some ability to harness. Keane is shot and his best days are well and truly behind him. I said it before he entered semi-retirement and have seen no reason to change my mind. Never mind £750K... £7.50 would be too much.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: KRS on January 05, 2012, 04:39:25 PM
According to AM on SSN...

Keane deal is 50-50 at the moment
He has no intention of selling Bent
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: villa for life on January 05, 2012, 04:41:08 PM
Keane, like Bent, is a fantastic goalscorer. Like Bent, he will need service.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 05, 2012, 04:42:34 PM
According to AM on SSN...

Keane deal is 50-50 at the moment
He has no intention of selling Bent


Oh sounds promising maybe he won't be joining.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Malandro on January 05, 2012, 05:00:22 PM
According to AM on SSN...

Keane deal is 50-50 at the moment
He has no intention of selling Bent


Oh sounds promising maybe he won't be joining.

Come on this is the signing nobody wants, of course he is coming. (And to be fed on Heskey's crosses)
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 05, 2012, 05:02:04 PM
its not 50/50.  more like 99%
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Hoppo on January 05, 2012, 05:13:13 PM
Im gutted at where we are and where were going. Ive tried to stay optimistic I still go down I still do away games. Robbie Keane!! dont bother Villa. It sends out such a wrong message to the younger players in the squad. Put faith in Clark Herd Bannan Albrighton and Gardner. Sell Collins buy a young mobile centre half. Raid the french league for the new Samba! Please Alex dont get Keane on loan for two months. What is the point?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: tarzansbrother on January 05, 2012, 05:19:25 PM
Say if Gabby or NZogbia are replaced by Keane for the 2 month loan period. Gonna cause a few issues I think. Also think its a total waste of money and stinks of desperation.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: KRS on January 05, 2012, 05:38:28 PM
I see no benefit in this deal other than for Keane himself...picks up a nice per week, gets to train every day to maintain his fitness, may be expected to play a few games then goes back to the USA. No doubt he'll get to see friends and family whilst over here for his short stint. Sounds like a nice well paid holiday to me.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Shrek on January 05, 2012, 05:44:11 PM
We are now being compared to Bolton, it's depressing.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 05, 2012, 05:47:11 PM
We are now being compared to Bolton, it's depressing.

By whom?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Nev on January 05, 2012, 05:49:35 PM
A busted flush on mammoth wages via a short term, no commitment deal.

Can't wait.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Brend'Watkins on January 05, 2012, 05:50:02 PM
We are now being compared to Bolton, it's depressing.

Only because we are possibly selling an international center half in this window, yes?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: KevinGage on January 05, 2012, 05:57:23 PM
Even Yorke was having a pop last night, saying he hopes Newcastle don't end up 'like Aston Villa' and motivation becomes a problem in the second half of the season if they're out of contention for Europe and the cup.

So that's the likes of Paul Scholes, Benoit Assou-Ekotto and now Yorke who have readily used our name to illustrate what mediocrity/ lack of ambition looks like in recent months.  Is it just isolated thinking on their part, or indicative of our image now across the board? 

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rigadon on January 05, 2012, 06:00:45 PM
Even Yorke was having a pop last night, saying he hopes Newcastle don't end up 'like Aston Villa' and motivation becomes a problem in the second half of the season if they're out of contention for Europe and the cup.

So that's the likes of Paul Scholes, Benoit Assou-Ekotto and now Yorke who have readily used our name to illustrate what mediocrity/ lack of ambition looks like in recent months.  Is it just isolated thinking on their part, or indicative of our image now across the board? 



I think most neutrals have seen us for quite some time as a middle of the road premier league team.  The perception of us as 'boring, boring Villa' is a new one mind you.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: KRS on January 05, 2012, 06:05:26 PM
The perception of us as 'boring, boring Villa' is a new one mind you.
Cant remember the specific game but that started last season under GH.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SoccerHQ on January 05, 2012, 06:32:27 PM
Diame and Samba.

If Bent goes to Liverpool, I'd give Drogba his 2.5 year contract too.

Add Onouha to that list for me.

Onouha, Diame and Samba, I doubt those players are unrealistic for us even in our present state and I doubt their wages would be an issue either.

Striking department can stay as it is until the summer.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SoccerHQ on January 05, 2012, 06:35:17 PM
I am with you Kevin. France, Holland and our own lower leagues provide enough players at the 20-25 bracket at a decent price that are worth the gamble.

McEachran and Keane.. you can hear the barrel being scrapped. I thought Montgomerie had come in as chief scout, surely he can find better than this? A 20 year old Arteta would be good!

McLeish signed a 20 year old Arteta for Rangers believe it or not!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: AV82EC on January 05, 2012, 06:36:10 PM
The perception of us as 'boring, boring Villa' is a new one mind you.
Cant remember the specific game but that started last season under GH.

We were described in The Fiver the other night as "moribund" which I thought summed it up perfectly.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SoccerHQ on January 05, 2012, 06:41:39 PM
Even Yorke was having a pop last night, saying he hopes Newcastle don't end up 'like Aston Villa' and motivation becomes a problem in the second half of the season if they're out of contention for Europe and the cup.

So that's the likes of Paul Scholes, Benoit Assou-Ekotto and now Yorke who have readily used our name to illustrate what mediocrity/ lack of ambition looks like in recent months.  Is it just isolated thinking on their part, or indicative of our image now across the board? 



I think most neutrals have seen us for quite some time as a middle of the road premier league team.  The perception of us as 'boring, boring Villa' is a new one mind you.

It was around in the last year of John Gregory, 00-01 when most of our Sky tv games were like watching paint dry. So we've gone full circle in 10 years without winning a trophy or playing in the champions league. Lovely.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Clampy on January 05, 2012, 06:47:52 PM
Back on the Robbie Keane saga, i find the figures quoted baffling. I can't imagine for one minute the club would pay up to £750k to have have a 31 year old striker for 6  games, it just would'nt make sense. Those figures have got to be way off the mark.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: cheltenhamlion on January 05, 2012, 07:00:46 PM
Not impressed by any move for either Keane or McEachran to be honest. Strikes me as bodies for the sake of it.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Risso on January 05, 2012, 07:03:23 PM
The perception of us as 'boring, boring Villa' is a new one mind you.
Cant remember the specific game but that started last season under GH.

We were described in The Fiver the other night as "moribund" which I thought summed it up perfectly.

We absolutely are a by word for lack of ambition and mediocrity amongst fans of other teams.  Us and Everton maybe, but with us people seem genuinely bemused that we've chucked in the towel.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SheffieldVillain on January 05, 2012, 07:25:28 PM
Diame and Samba.

If Bent goes to Liverpool, I'd give Drogba his 2.5 year contract too.

Add Onouha to that list for me.

Onouha, Diame and Samba, I doubt those players are unrealistic for us even in our present state and I doubt their wages would be an issue either.

Striking department can stay as it is until the summer.

That would make me extremely happy. Not big names, but solid players who would improve us. Sadly probably not going to happen.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Shrek on January 05, 2012, 07:32:32 PM
Haven't Spurs bid 15mill for Samba and Hoillet.

I'd say we out the question if it's a choice between us and them.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: spangley1812 on January 05, 2012, 07:36:22 PM
If Gary "Bobby Moore" Cahill thinks he is worth £110,000.00 pw then I suspect Samba may be after a similar amount which would put him out of our reach
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: john e on January 05, 2012, 07:58:16 PM
i actually wont mind if keane comes for however long, he's always been a tricky player,
he can score and create goals, and for me would be a improvment up front with either Bent or Gabby on what we have at the moment
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: eamonn on January 05, 2012, 08:10:34 PM
Who would Keane play instead of? There's no way Gabby and Bent will be dropped, and I can't see how we could accomodate all three together.
As for the young Chelsea fella, Jesus wept. Don't we have enough promising midfielders of our own? Loan signings usually suck balls typified in this case by a player already put out to pasture getting a chance to earn a nice wedge and play with his two best footballing buddies and a young lad who, if he plays well, will be back down to Chelsea as soon as possible.

I'd take Omar Cummings back before these two.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ROBBO on January 05, 2012, 08:14:35 PM
The Keane of five years ago was decent but not now,cannot see any sense in this whatsoever, why put noses out of joint especially the younger brigade to fit an ageing has been in for a few weeks? where is the benefit. Lets say he does well and scores a few what happens when he leaves? from top to bottom we are rudderless, i would prefer an owner who attends every home game and shares the misery.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: john e on January 05, 2012, 08:23:11 PM
The Keane of five years ago was decent but not now,cannot see any sense in this whatsoever, why put noses out of joint especially the younger brigade to fit an ageing has been in for a few weeks? where is the benefit. Lets say he does well and scores a few what happens when he leaves? from top to bottom we are rudderless, i would prefer an owner who attends every home game and shares the misery.


i think you've got enough misery for the both of you
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SoccerHQ on January 05, 2012, 08:26:16 PM
Haven't Spurs bid 15mill for Samba and Hoillet.

I'd say we out the question if it's a choice between us and them.

I take that as 8m for Samba and 7m for Holliet.

Still maintain, whack James Collins in the deal plus 3-4m and try and get Samba that way.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: caster troy on January 05, 2012, 08:37:16 PM
My first thought when I heard Keane mentioned was 'Surely we aren't that desperate' but apparently we are. Worrying times.

12 years too late. Who are we going to try for next, Benni McCarthy? Juninho?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Eigentor on January 05, 2012, 09:06:11 PM
What's the thining behind signing Robbie Keane?

An experienced head if we are dragged into a relegation battle?

I hope not.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: fredm on January 05, 2012, 09:21:28 PM
Haven't Spurs bid 15mill for Samba and Hoillet.

I'd say we out the question if it's a choice between us and them.

I take that as 8m for Samba and 7m for Holliet.

Still maintain, whack James Collins in the deal plus 3-4m and try and get Samba that way.

I would say if Samba became available there would be several other clubs that he would be interested in without even thinking about us.

I think people need to be realistic - why would any half decent PL player want to come to VP?  They only used to go to Bolton because of the wages and we won't be paying those!  They are not going to win any trophies by coming so why bother when they can get better deals elsewhere.  We should be looking at younger players outside the PL who want to step up and make a name for themselves so they can then go on to one of the big clubs.  Because that is what we are now - a stepping stone.

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Villanation on January 05, 2012, 09:24:33 PM
If Samba is available we shouldn't wait for whoever wants to go after him we should man up and go and get him, that way we can see how much QPR wants to shell out for Collins.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Villanation on January 05, 2012, 09:27:56 PM
The perception of us as 'boring, boring Villa' is a new one mind you.
Cant remember the specific game but that started last season under GH.

We were described in The Fiver the other night as "moribund" which I thought summed it up perfectly.

The problem for Villa is that we had 4 seasons looking like we where on the cusp, threatening, teams feared us, basically we where a thorn in the top 4's side, the fall from grace has been remarkable and not least very noticeable which has left a lot of people thinking how can you go that far and then fall of the edge so quickly.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: kippaxvilla2 on January 05, 2012, 09:48:22 PM
My first thought when I heard Keane mentioned was 'Surely we aren't that desperate' but apparently we are. Worrying times.

12 years too late. Who are we going to try for next, Benni McCarthy? Juninho?

Mirandinha I heard.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on January 05, 2012, 10:09:26 PM
mebbe i'm being a bit thick but Keane's been over there since August and he's only played 4 games?? Is this mid-season break 6 months long or do they only play about 8 games a season?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: littlevillain on January 05, 2012, 10:18:30 PM
Keanes absolutely brutal now, hence playing his days out in the states . Can't get my head around us bringing him in, rather give a young villa youth team player a chance.
desperate days indeed.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Villanation on January 05, 2012, 10:19:24 PM
mebbe i'm being a bit thick but Keane's been over there since August and he's only played 4 games?? Is this mid-season break 6 months long or do they only play about 8 games a season?

Just had a quick look and it say 3 starts 1 on as sub, so 4 played and the rest as unused sub.

Not prolific then.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on January 05, 2012, 10:22:13 PM
mebbe i'm being a bit thick but Keane's been over there since August and he's only played 4 games?? Is this mid-season break 6 months long or do they only play about 8 games a season?

Just had a quick look and it say 3 starts 1 on as sub, so 4 played and the rest as unused sub.

Not prolific then.


aye. i must admit i'm clueless of the set-up over there but you'd think he'd have got more than 4 games since August. So not just shit but lacking match practice as well. oh joy.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Villanation on January 05, 2012, 10:29:03 PM
mebbe i'm being a bit thick but Keane's been over there since August and he's only played 4 games?? Is this mid-season break 6 months long or do they only play about 8 games a season?

Just had a quick look and it say 3 starts 1 on as sub, so 4 played and the rest as unused sub.

Not prolific then.


aye. i must admit i'm clueless of the set-up over there but you'd think he'd have got more than 4 games since August. So not just shit but lacking match practice as well. oh joy.


Don't get there season, I've just worked out that they played 20+ games in the 2nd half of there season, being Aug/Sept/Oct/Nov/Dec, if Keane has only been in the first team squad for 9 of those games that would say he didn't even make the bench for the others, the only thing i can think of is Injury..
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on January 05, 2012, 10:33:50 PM
so 4 appearances in 20 odd games? jesus it just gets worse. I suppose we should be thankful Lerner hasn't tried to sign Beckham as well
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JUAN PABLO on January 05, 2012, 10:38:15 PM
so 4 appearances in 20 odd games? jesus it just gets worse. I suppose we should be thankful Lerner hasn't tried to sign Beckham as well

If only Greg
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Villanation on January 05, 2012, 10:39:44 PM
so 4 appearances in 20 odd games? jesus it just gets worse. I suppose we should be thankful Lerner hasn't tried to sign Beckham as well

The only possible explanation is that Keane must have been carrying an injury and was our of the selection process for all the other games, he has to be easily good enough for LA Galaxy I would have thought.

Even so not much game time for a 31 year old striker he'll need 1 month of those 2 to get his shooting boots back up to premiership standards.

No point to it I wouldn't have thought.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JUAN PABLO on January 05, 2012, 10:41:32 PM
If this is true . Somebody needs to ask the question to AMC . Why Robbie Keane ?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Somniloquism on January 05, 2012, 10:42:15 PM
mebbe i'm being a bit thick but Keane's been over there since August and he's only played 4 games?? Is this mid-season break 6 months long or do they only play about 8 games a season?

He played in 8 games (started 7) and scored 3. The worry is he has been out injured as well. He played in their post season playoff ames as well which come under separate stats.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Villanation on January 05, 2012, 10:45:12 PM
mebbe i'm being a bit thick but Keane's been over there since August and he's only played 4 games?? Is this mid-season break 6 months long or do they only play about 8 games a season?

He played in 8 games (started 7) and scored 3. The worry is he has been out injured as well. He played in their post season playoff ames as well which come under separate stats.

Well that's a lot better then, knew i had something wrong there simply because there is no way he wouldn't figure in American footy.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on January 05, 2012, 10:49:56 PM
mebbe i'm being a bit thick but Keane's been over there since August and he's only played 4 games?? Is this mid-season break 6 months long or do they only play about 8 games a season?

He played in 8 games (started 7) and scored 3. The worry is he has been out injured as well. He played in their post season playoff ames as well which come under separate stats.


ah right. bloody wikipedia
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: john e on January 05, 2012, 10:54:19 PM
i've never known such a overeaction to player possibly coming in as Keane,
 he's 31 not 41,   he's not crap, he's better than Heskey and Fonzo
 he's coming for a short time not a five year contract,
i dont understand the meltdown
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Somniloquism on January 05, 2012, 10:59:22 PM
mebbe i'm being a bit thick but Keane's been over there since August and he's only played 4 games?? Is this mid-season break 6 months long or do they only play about 8 games a season?

He played in 8 games (started 7) and scored 3. The worry is he has been out injured as well. He played in their post season playoff ames as well which come under separate stats.


ah right. bloody wikipedia

The LA Galaxy roster actually. You have to remember the yanks like having weird leagues and post season shite. I think they now have a champion league equivalent as well with the concacaf but I don't know this is the only thing they do as it used to be a top 8 of the league have a separate competition.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on January 05, 2012, 11:01:15 PM
because no-one can understand it John. If it was a view to a permanent deal then you could at least understand it if not agree, but 2 months as a reserve behind Gabby and Bent for 750k because he's "better than Heskey" just seems mental
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JJ-AV on January 05, 2012, 11:02:01 PM
Some idiot from The Mirror is saying Bent to Liverpool is on. Kendrick is saying it isn't.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: j66acd on January 05, 2012, 11:03:07 PM
Just been linked with a move for Drogba in the mail!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 05, 2012, 11:05:54 PM
If we sign Keane, we could do something we've never done before. Any idea what it is?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on January 05, 2012, 11:08:03 PM
live televised throat slitting?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: john e on January 05, 2012, 11:08:10 PM
because no-one can understand it John. If it was a view to a permanent deal then you could at least understand it if not agree, but 2 months as a reserve behind Gabby and Bent for 750k because he's "better than Heskey" just seems mental


and is all that set in stone, we know its 750k do we ? we know all the ins and outs of the deal that hasnt even been done yet.
listen i wouldnt be rushing down the street to sign Keane, but i dont see it as the catastrophe its being made out on here to be
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Brend'Watkins on January 05, 2012, 11:08:55 PM
If we sign Keane, we could do something we've never done before. Any idea what it is?

Sign someone for less than the original asking price?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on January 05, 2012, 11:10:13 PM
If we sign Keane, we could do something we've never done before. Any idea what it is?

have four current Irish internationals playing in the same side?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JUAN PABLO on January 05, 2012, 11:10:24 PM
http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2012/jan/05/alex-mcleish-loan-robbie-keane?newsfeed=true
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 05, 2012, 11:10:32 PM
If we sign Keane, we could do something we've never done before. Any idea what it is?

Reach rock bottom?




*joke*
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: luke25 on January 05, 2012, 11:11:31 PM
If we sign Keane, we could do something we've never done before. Any idea what it is?

have four current Irish internationals playing in the same side?
That was my guess too.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Louzie0 on January 05, 2012, 11:12:27 PM
If we sign Keane, we could do something we've never done before. Any idea what it is?

OOh!  is it to do with singing something - or wearing something?
Or not wearing something?

You Decide...as they say...
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JUAN PABLO on January 05, 2012, 11:12:34 PM
Keane and Bent have never scored in the same game ....
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JJ-AV on January 05, 2012, 11:13:01 PM
If we sign Keane, we could do something we've never done before. Any idea what it is?

Field an outfield comprising of players from the British isles excluding England?

Probably couldn't do that tbf.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 05, 2012, 11:13:23 PM
If we sign Keane, we could do something we've never done before. Any idea what it is?

have four current Irish internationals playing in the same side?
That was my guess too.

Staunton, McGrath, Townsend, Houghton?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 05, 2012, 11:13:49 PM
Field a team of Irish players.

I saw it on Kendrick's Twitter too.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 05, 2012, 11:14:21 PM
Something else.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: john e on January 05, 2012, 11:14:36 PM
Field a team of Irish players.

I saw it on Kendrick's Twitter too.


well we do need a bit of luck
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: kippaxvilla2 on January 05, 2012, 11:15:31 PM
Asked whether he had spoken to Bent about the transfer speculation, McLeish replied: "We kid him on. There's the banter: 'When you off?' – that kind of stuff. He says: 'You probably know more than me,' but I don't. He's another one that I don't think will be going anywhere.

"We've heard stories saying this one and that one is going to try and buy him but we say he is not for sale and, secondly, nobody has contacted us."

What a strange conversation to have with a player.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on January 05, 2012, 11:16:04 PM
because no-one can understand it John. If it was a view to a permanent deal then you could at least understand it if not agree, but 2 months as a reserve behind Gabby and Bent for 750k because he's "better than Heskey" just seems mental


and is all that set in stone, we know its 750k do we ? we know all the ins and outs of the deal that hasnt even been done yet.
listen i wouldnt be rushing down the street to sign Keane, but i dont see it as the catastrophe its being made out on here to be


true but id prefer the wages to be spent on someone who will play a part in Villa's future longer than March especially as the wages thing has been drummed into our heads constantly by the club. He's better than Heskey - so what? A corpse carried between Dunne and Collins and dumped in the opposition's box at corners would be more of a threat than Heskey, and a lot cheaper than Keane.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JUAN PABLO on January 05, 2012, 11:16:41 PM
there will be alot of irish players there including Ireland and Stevens
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 05, 2012, 11:16:44 PM
Field a team of Irish players.

I saw it on Kendrick's Twitter too.


well we do need a bit of luck

If it stops Heskey getting a game, I'm all for it.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JUAN PABLO on January 05, 2012, 11:17:48 PM
whats Cascarino doing
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Louzie0 on January 05, 2012, 11:21:46 PM
ok I'm having another go.

Is it alphabetical like fielding a team from A (supermarc) to L (lichaj - but he's injured)?

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 05, 2012, 11:23:39 PM
A back flip goal celebration?

Field the England and Ireland number 9 together?

Have 2 players with over 100 pl goals to their name in the same side?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: E I Adio on January 05, 2012, 11:26:15 PM
Does it have anything to do with cartwheels?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JJ-AV on January 05, 2012, 11:29:03 PM
Have 2 players with over 100 pl goals to their name in the same side?

Good shout, I thought this was it as soon as you said it.

But Yorke and Cole, Sheringham and Ferdinand and Bergkamp and Henry have all done it.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 05, 2012, 11:30:10 PM
Have 2 players with over 100 pl goals to their name in the same side?

Good shout, I thought this was it as soon as you said it.

But Yorke and Cole, Sheringham and Ferdinand and Bergkamp and Henry have all done it.

I said we've done. Other clubs have done it before.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 05, 2012, 11:30:49 PM
Have 2 players with over 100 pl goals to their name in the same side?

Good shout, I thought this was it as soon as you said it.

But Yorke and Cole, Sheringham and Ferdinand and Bergkamp and Henry have all done it.

I meant specific to Villa, would have thought Fowler and Owen at Liverpool would have too? And Lampard and Drogba at Chelsea.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JJ-AV on January 05, 2012, 11:34:04 PM
Ah fair enough. I take it that's it then?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 05, 2012, 11:34:39 PM
No it bloody isn't. Keep guessing.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 05, 2012, 11:37:54 PM
Is it something to do with caps - Given, Keane, McGrath, Dunne, Staunton must all be high up on the all time cap list for Ireland - would we have the record for most Irish caps or something.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JJ-AV on January 05, 2012, 11:38:23 PM
Well... It sort of is, isn't it? *winky*


(Although Wiki says Bent is only on 96!)


Erm...

Something to do with international captains?!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JJ-AV on January 05, 2012, 11:39:48 PM
First time we've had a current record international goal scorer?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 05, 2012, 11:41:42 PM
Field a team that for the first time ever will include a player called Robbie Keane?

I'm pretty sure this isn't what Dave meant, but technically, i'm also right! 
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 05, 2012, 11:45:51 PM
Well... It sort of is, isn't it? *winky*


(Although Wiki says Bent is only on 96!)


Erm...

Something to do with international captains?!

Number of Spurs rejects taken on by one club in a 12 month period.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on January 05, 2012, 11:48:38 PM
damm i was going for that one. first team in the PL to have a squad devoid of any players Harry redknapp wants to sign? Hang on, we have that now.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: hawkeye on January 06, 2012, 12:03:17 AM
This just demonstrates how inept the people running our club are, there is absoloutely no point in spending money on a complete has been that will do nothing to improve the team or squad moral. If Keane was good enough to play in the Pl he would be playing in the PL.


Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: eamonn on January 06, 2012, 12:04:10 AM
I wonder how sharp he's looking in training at Spurs. At least he's doing it with quality players.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on January 06, 2012, 12:05:28 AM
first time we had a player who's played for 4 european cup winning clubs?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: hawkeye on January 06, 2012, 12:14:10 AM
I wonder how sharp he's looking in training at Spurs. At least he's doing it with quality players.
If he was looking sharp Arry would have signed him, because he isnt we have.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 06, 2012, 12:16:37 AM
Apart from the other time we were going to sign him i've never really looked at Keane's record in any depth. I thought his goal scoring record was better than it actually is, he's never scored more than 16 league goals in a season. Seems he's a kind of Gabby type for numbers, 10-16 league goals a season.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on January 06, 2012, 12:30:18 AM
He'll probably score 8 in 8 games or something mental.

 And then bugger off.

 Leaving us with Ivanhoe.


*gloom*
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Irish villain on January 06, 2012, 12:38:45 AM
Have 2 players with over 100 pl goals to their name in the same side?

Good shout, I thought this was it as soon as you said it.

But Yorke and Cole, Sheringham and Ferdinand and Bergkamp and Henry have all done it.

I said we've done. Other clubs have done it before.

Is it a bit of a let down, like, the first time we have signed a player from an American club??
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on January 06, 2012, 12:50:48 AM
He'll probably score 8 in 8 games or something mental.

 And then bugger off.

 Leaving us with Ivanhoe.


*gloom*

Let's hope that he does that, ensures our PL survival and that Heskey has been sold during the window. Wins all around.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JJ-AV on January 06, 2012, 01:12:17 AM
Quote
Villa will cover Keane's £42,000-a-week wages during his time at the club and there is also expected to be a loan fee in the region of £500,000.

From the Guardian.

Such a lazy signing. That's almost a million quid for someone who'll play for eight games. Surely we could invest that better?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Edvard Remberg on January 06, 2012, 01:15:37 AM
Start a game with more than 500 international caps between them?
Or 3 players with 100+ caps
Or start a game with 300 Irish caps?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Steve R on January 06, 2012, 01:26:01 AM
put out a monosyllabic team?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: littlevillain on January 06, 2012, 01:26:48 AM
watched him over here (states) a few times and he's got a few goals but thats after missing sitters after sitters. He's playing for the best side in a shit league so of course he will get goals but it's pretty obvious why he's not in the premier anymore. Apart from all that I can't stand his dodgy goal celebration.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Brian Taylor on January 06, 2012, 01:30:31 AM
Used to be a time when Villa fielded most of the Irish team. It's back to basics.
Birmingham had more paid Paddy workers than the whole of the Republic back then, and most chose to support the Villa even though a good lot of them lived in Sparkhill! I wonder why?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: KRS on January 06, 2012, 01:58:27 AM
Quote
Villa will cover Keane's £42,000-a-week wages during his time at the club and there is also expected to be a loan fee in the region of £500,000.

From the Guardian.

Such a lazy signing. That's almost a million quid for someone who'll play for eight games. Surely we could invest that better?
Thats not to say that he will be play all 8 games and I'd be very surprised if he gets more than a few sub appearances let alone play a full 90 minutes. In a time where the club is cutting costs all over the place this has to be one of the most ridiculous decisions I've ever known by the club. It just doesnt make sense whatever way you look at it.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TheSandman on January 06, 2012, 02:20:35 AM
Have 2 players with over 100 pl goals to their name in the same side?

Good shout, I thought this was it as soon as you said it.

But Yorke and Cole, Sheringham and Ferdinand and Bergkamp and Henry have all done it.

I said we've done. Other clubs have done it before.

Is it a bit of a let down, like, the first time we have signed a player from an American club??

Guzan was signed from one.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: KevinGage on January 06, 2012, 02:44:56 AM
Sky website has us linked with this bloke.   With quotes:


 Clicky (http://www1.skysports.com/football/news/12691/7413707/Villa-link-flatters-Mulongoti)

Quote

Villa link flatters Mulongoti
Congolese defender dreams of playing in the Premier League
By Giscard Gourizro.      Last Updated: January 5, 2012 10:07pm


Assani Lukimya-Mulongoti has welcomed reports linking him with Aston Villa, claiming he has always dreamt of turning out in the Premier League.

The Congo international is currently on the books of German second division outfit Fortuna Dusseldorf, but he is being strongly linked with a January exit.

The highly-rated defender is enjoying an eye-catching 2011/12 campaign and is expected to make the step up into a higher division in the near future

A switch to England has been touted, with Villa said to be leading the hunt.

The 25-year-old admits he would struggle to turn down such an opportunity, with the speculation having turned his head.

"My dream is to one day play in the Premier League," Lukimya-Mulongoti told Sky Sports.

"I am flattered by the link with Aston Villa as they are a great club.

"I am trying to improve so that one day I can go to the Premier League and play against all of the top strikers that are there."
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: andyh on January 06, 2012, 09:12:31 AM
Sky website has us linked with this bloke.   With quotes:


 Clicky (http://www1.skysports.com/football/news/12691/7413707/Villa-link-flatters-Mulongoti)

Quote

Villa link flatters Mulongoti
Congolese defender dreams of playing in the Premier League
By Giscard Gourizro.      Last Updated: January 5, 2012 10:07pm


Assani Lukimya-Mulongoti has welcomed reports linking him with Aston Villa, claiming he has always dreamt of turning out in the Premier League.

The Congo international is currently on the books of German second division outfit Fortuna Dusseldorf, but he is being strongly linked with a January exit.

The highly-rated defender is enjoying an eye-catching 2011/12 campaign and is expected to make the step up into a higher division in the near future

A switch to England has been touted, with Villa said to be leading the hunt.

The 25-year-old admits he would struggle to turn down such an opportunity, with the speculation having turned his head.

"My dream is to one day play in the Premier League," Lukimya-Mulongoti told Sky Sports.

"I am flattered by the link with Aston Villa as they are a great club.

"I am trying to improve so that one day I can go to the Premier League and play against all of the top strikers that are there."
Is he the Congolese Zidane ?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: N'ZMAV on January 06, 2012, 09:36:50 AM
If we sold Darren Bent then I'd be looking to spend the money wisely on a few players. I'd try for Jonas Olsson from WBA, Hoillett & olsson from Blackburn Rovers and if we've enough left over then a Bid for a striker, maybe Kenwyne Jones, or Jermaine Defoe.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: garyshawsknee on January 06, 2012, 09:37:33 AM
He's the congolese De la Cruz.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 06, 2012, 09:48:39 AM
If we sold Darren Bent then I'd be looking to spend the money wisely on a few players. I'd try for Jonas Olsson from WBA, Hoillett & olsson from Blackburn Rovers and if we've enough left over then a Bid for a striker, maybe Kenwyne Jones, or Jermaine Defoe.

If we sold Bent and I hope we don't, Hoillett would be good. But other than that I'd try and look further afield for signings as we can get better value and quality. We are struggling for funds so buying from Europe would make much more sense than paying inflated Premier League prices.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 06, 2012, 09:50:59 AM
If we get £30m for Bent, which I sincerely hope does not happen, then I'd be looking at Alex for CB and a midfielder this window - maybe Diame.  That should leave a good chunk for a replacement striker, who I'd be prepared to wait until the summer for if necessary.

Who was that striker from Germany we were linked with the other day?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 06, 2012, 09:57:38 AM
I would hope that we have a scouting structure in place that if we had 30 million to spend, we could get 4 players across the squad of good quality that are young enough to make good profit in the future too.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: eastie on January 06, 2012, 10:19:33 AM
If we get £30m for Bent, which I sincerely hope does not happen, then I'd be looking at Alex for CB and a midfielder this window - maybe Diame.  That should leave a good chunk for a replacement striker, who I'd be prepared to wait until the summer for if necessary.

Who was that striker from Germany we were linked with the other day?

No way would bent attract a £30M bid , wed be lucky to get our money back on him which would be a good deal as his goals were the main reason we stayed up, so hes done his job, the lack of quality service and style of play i expect he would jump at a move.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 06, 2012, 10:24:00 AM
His record for us is more or less one every other game, so I can't see how that would lead to his value dropping.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: garyshawsknee on January 06, 2012, 10:32:31 AM
Didn't we pay 19 plus add ons?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 06, 2012, 10:36:16 AM
£18m rising to £24m.  Not sure what the triggers were for the extra or how that plays in if we sell him.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: garyshawsknee on January 06, 2012, 10:43:07 AM
I presume nothing has been triggered so far,only maybe his desire to leave.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Billy Walker on January 06, 2012, 10:44:41 AM
His record for us is more or less one every other game, so I can't see how that would lead to his value dropping.

Exactly.  If we were to sell him for less than we got him it would suggest the folks who are running our club have finally lost the plot.  Liverpool paid £35 million for Carroll, let the bidding start from there.  Mind you, the club have said Bent is not for sale so I hope they stick to their word on this one.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Hoppo on January 06, 2012, 12:06:30 PM
If you look back at why Stephen Ireland pulled out of the Irish squad you will find that he fell out with Robbie Keane amonst others.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 06, 2012, 12:08:06 PM
If you look back at why Stephen Ireland pulled out of the Irish squad you will find that he fell out with Robbie Keane amonst others.

Wasn't it because he lied about a death in the family and then admitted that he lied about it? Im sure thats what it was?  No wonder he fell out with players over it.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Merv on January 06, 2012, 12:11:08 PM
Has there been any update on the lad who took on trial recently? Djalo, wasn't it?

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: garyshawsknee on January 06, 2012, 12:11:10 PM
I thought it was due to a couple of players holding him down,and trying to remove his syrup.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Hoppo on January 06, 2012, 12:14:42 PM
It was to do with his 'extensions' Robbie keane being the joker in the pack. This bullshit that we need Keane for the dressing room. All that will happen is Dunne and Collins showing Keane the delights of Mechu on Summer Row.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 06, 2012, 12:15:21 PM
Has there been any update on the lad who took on trial recently? Djalo, wasn't it?

That never went ahead.  Eck opted against it.  I think he must of got pissed off that he announced it on his FB page.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 06, 2012, 12:15:48 PM
Any more guesses?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 06, 2012, 12:16:33 PM
Apparently, Sky sports oh so reliable sources have said that QPR have bid £5m for Samba.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ADVILLAFAN on January 06, 2012, 12:18:52 PM
Apparently, Sky sports oh so reliable sources have said that QPR have bid £5m for Samba.

Bugger, was hoping they'd go for Collins.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 06, 2012, 12:19:13 PM
Apparently, Sky sports oh so reliable sources have said that QPR have bid £5m for Samba.

If that is accepted we should be in for him at that price.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 06, 2012, 12:20:59 PM
Apparently, Sky sports oh so reliable sources have said that QPR have bid £5m for Samba.

Bugger, was hoping they'd go for Collins.

You never know, they might be as their owner was on Talksport this morning speaking to Alan Brazil and Ronnie and he said they were in the market for defenders.  Theres always Sunderland who might go for Collins
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Pete3206 on January 06, 2012, 12:22:05 PM
Apparently, Sky sports oh so reliable sources have said that QPR have bid £5m for Samba.

If that is accepted we should be in for him at that price.

Depends what the salary package is. I suspect that QPR are paying silly wages at the moment.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: UK Redsox on January 06, 2012, 12:24:34 PM
Any more guesses?

Wasn't it the "national team record goalscorer" then ?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 06, 2012, 12:25:21 PM
No it wasn't.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 06, 2012, 12:27:24 PM
Apparently, Sky sports oh so reliable sources have said that QPR have bid £5m for Samba.

If that is accepted we should be in for him at that price.

I'd say at least half the PL would be saying the same thing.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 06, 2012, 12:27:56 PM
No it wasn't.

http://tinyurl.com/77dq5xu
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: garyshawsknee on January 06, 2012, 12:28:08 PM
Professor Plum in the library with the lead piping.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 06, 2012, 12:29:07 PM
No it wasn't.

http://tinyurl.com/77dq5xu


You've lost me there.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 06, 2012, 12:30:41 PM
No it wasn't.

http://tinyurl.com/77dq5xu


You've lost me there.

Total error by me! ignore that.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 06, 2012, 12:31:31 PM
No it wasn't.

http://tinyurl.com/77dq5xu


You've lost me there.

Total error by me! ignore that.

I grant you absolution.

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 06, 2012, 12:32:23 PM
No it wasn't.

http://tinyurl.com/77dq5xu


You've lost me there.

Total error by me! ignore that.

I grant you absolution.

Thanking you!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: garyshawsknee on January 06, 2012, 12:32:45 PM
I don't think he'd play much under Trappatoni (sic) anyway. He prefers a defensive midfielder.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Small Rodent on January 06, 2012, 12:36:18 PM
Play a team with 5 international captains at one time or another?  Given, Dunne, Keane, Petrov, Collins at a guess.

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Small Rodent on January 06, 2012, 12:40:41 PM
Just noticed, if Beye and Makoun come back off loan we could field a team with 11 different nationalities.

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: brontebilly on January 06, 2012, 12:42:57 PM
Used to be a time when Villa fielded most of the Irish team. It's back to basics.
Birmingham had more paid Paddy workers than the whole of the Republic back then, and most chose to support the Villa even though a good lot of them lived in Sparkhill! I wonder why?

Didn't realize Luiz Suarez posted on here
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Clampy on January 06, 2012, 12:43:25 PM
Could we field a team with 11 different nationalities and a British Isles team?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Small Rodent on January 06, 2012, 12:44:26 PM
Could we field a team with 11 different nationalities and a British Isles team?


Could do that without Keane.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 06, 2012, 12:54:09 PM
We could field a team of 11 full internationals, plus subs, in their relevant positions (this is a bit of a cheat as Shane Lowry would be a sub, as he was for Australia once).
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Matt C on January 06, 2012, 12:55:35 PM
Apparently, Sky sports oh so reliable sources have said that QPR have bid £5m for Samba.

If that is accepted we should be in for him at that price.

I'd say at least half the PL would be saying the same thing.

Indeed. Samba can do better than QPR I'd suggest.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dave on January 06, 2012, 01:02:12 PM
If we'd really wanted to, could we not have done that anyway?

Given
Hutton
Dunne
Collins
Warnock
N'Zogbia
Petrov
Clark
Bannan
Agbonlahor
Bent

Guzan
Lichaj
Beye
Jenas
Ireland
Makoun
Heskey
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Shoody on January 06, 2012, 02:53:45 PM
If we get £30m for Bent, which I sincerely hope does not happen, then I'd be looking at Alex for CB and a midfielder this window - maybe Diame.  That should leave a good chunk for a replacement striker, who I'd be prepared to wait until the summer for if necessary.

Who was that striker from Germany we were linked with the other day?

It was Lucas Barrios wasnt it? That will never ever happen unfortunately

If we get £30m for Bent my dream January/Summer would be:

In
Samba £5m-ish
Etienne Capoue £7m
Benjamin Corgnet £6m
Moussa Sow £12m
Clyne (tribunal)
M'Bengue £6m

Out
Bent £30m
Collins £5m
Warnock £3m
Petrov £3m (unfortunately)

Would give us a solid spine I reckon. We may even be a better team for it.

                  Given
Clyne  Samba  Dunne  M'Bengue
                 Capoue
           Corgnet   Ireland
Albrighton                 Nzogbia
                   Sow

And a decent Bench: Guzan, Clark, Stevens, Herd, Gabby, Bannan, Gardner

would certainly be capable of finishing 7th and challenging Everton, Newcastle and Sunderland for the 'Best of The Rest' Trophy.

I dont want us to sell Bent, but If we somehow managed to swindle £30m+ for him and it was all reinvested into the team (it wont be). And we used it to get in some [relatively] cheap quality from abroad (we wouldnt) then it could be good for the club. But hopefully we keep him.

Instead, we'll sell Bent for £22m and sign Keane on loan, Steven Davis and/or Craig Gardner.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JJ-AV on January 06, 2012, 03:09:10 PM
Sow's gone to Turkey I think
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: LeeB on January 06, 2012, 03:11:16 PM
Sow's gone to Turkey I think

Well I'm sure they'll reap the benefits.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: taylorsworkrate on January 06, 2012, 03:14:05 PM
Sow's gone to Turkey I think

Well I'm sure they'll reap the benefits.

Clappy thing.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JJ-AV on January 06, 2012, 03:16:47 PM
Haha. Very good.

Completely away from us, 'cos we'll never get him. But Redknapp has  just publicly announced that Demba Ba has a release clause (rumoured to be £5m) in his contract.

Wouldn't surprise me as when he signed for West Ham he insisted he got a release on a free clause if they got relegated.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dante Lavelli on January 06, 2012, 03:19:22 PM
You reckon that Etienne Capoue would only be 7m?  He'd be a great signing.
I'd add Hoillet to the list (who Keen said can go this window) for say 8m.
Clyne for about 3m

A centre back and a left back would also be required in the summer but I haven't a clue who.

                Given
Clyne   Collins  Dunne  Warnock
          Capoue    Clarke   
                Ireland
Nzogbia                    Hoillet
                Gabby
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 06, 2012, 03:23:41 PM
Spurs are interested in Hoilett so I can see him (if spurs put in a bid for him) going there.  We, on the hand, have to sell to buy and cant see RL forking out the cash to get him now.
Even if both Villa and Spurs had bids accepted, he would choose spurs as they are showing real ambition especailly as they are challenging for the title and look certain to be playing champions league football.  We will be challenging for 8th spot at best the way we are going.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: UK Redsox on January 06, 2012, 03:33:10 PM

Out
Bent £30m
Collins £5m
Warnock £3m
Petrov £3m
(unfortunately)

£5 for Collins and £3m each for  Warnock/Petrov ?

I can't see any of them fetching half that much
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 06, 2012, 03:36:59 PM

Out
Bent £30m
Collins £5m
Warnock £3m
Petrov £3m
(unfortunately)

£5 for Collins and £3m each for  Warnock/Petrov ?

I can't see any of them fetching half that much

£5m for Collins is realistic I think.  He has 18months left on his contract and is a first team regular.  Warnock on the other hand is defo worth £3m as he is one big liability
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 06, 2012, 03:39:13 PM
If we'd really wanted to, could we not have done that anyway?

Given
Hutton
Dunne
Collins
Warnock
N'Zogbia
Petrov
Clark
Bannan
Agbonlahor
Bent

Guzan
Lichaj
Beye
Jenas
Ireland
Makoun
Heskey

You can't count Makoun (on loan out) if you count Jenas (on loan in).
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: old man villa fan on January 06, 2012, 04:00:36 PM
Quote
Villa will cover Keane's £42,000-a-week wages during his time at the club and there is also expected to be a loan fee in the region of £500,000.

From the Guardian.

Such a lazy signing. That's almost a million quid for someone who'll play for eight games. Surely we could invest that better?
Thats not to say that he will be play all 8 games and I'd be very surprised if he gets more than a few sub appearances let alone play a full 90 minutes. In a time where the club is cutting costs all over the place this has to be one of the most ridiculous decisions I've ever known by the club. It just doesnt make sense whatever way you look at it.

Totally agree with you.

What is the point in spending this money for a short-term fix.  Or is McLeish really worried about relegation.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 06, 2012, 04:12:59 PM
I's just point out that the speculation around the cost of Keane is just that - speculation!  I can't see Randy, given our current thriftiness, going as high as £500 for a 2 month loan.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 06, 2012, 04:18:59 PM
I's just point out that the speculation around the cost of Keane is just that - speculation!  I can't see Randy, given our current thriftiness, going as high as £500 for a 2 month loan.

Not sure if that '£500' was done in jest, but it's probably true anyway!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Shoody on January 06, 2012, 04:29:55 PM

Out
Bent £30m
Collins £5m
Warnock £3m
Petrov £3m
(unfortunately)

£5 for Collins and £3m each for  Warnock/Petrov ?

I can't see any of them fetching half that much

Reportedly already rejected a bid of £3m for Collins. £5m is realistic.
Warnock is on big wages, we bought for about £6m didnt we? He's useless but he's English, experienced, international player at times so £3m is reasonable.
Petrov was going to be sold to some team (Galatasaray i think?) at one point for £2.5m and he's in much better form this season. Our captain. £3m is reasonable I think!

Only problem is the ridiculous wages they are all on.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Duncan Shaw on January 06, 2012, 04:45:41 PM
From McLeish's comments in the Guardian linked earlier in this thread, it would appear he'd be quite open to offers for Collins.
Anyway...from the mouth of babes....my 11 yr old son has just come in and sat down and started his homework "The Villa are supposedly signing Robbie Keane on a 2 month loan" I tell him "What's the point in that, he's rubbish" was the reply.
Are you listening Alex....Alex....ALEX!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Shoody on January 06, 2012, 04:57:59 PM
You reckon that Etienne Capoue would only be 7m?  He'd be a great signing.

yeah dont see why not prices are extremely low in Ligue 1 by the looks of it. Cabaye for 5/6m was a steal!

M'Bengue (left back) should be available for around 6m. Sure Capoue wouldnt be much more than 7. Think he'd be a fantastic signing for us to be honest
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 06, 2012, 04:59:24 PM
You reckon that Etienne Capoue would only be 7m?  He'd be a great signing.

yeah dont see why not prices are extremely low in Ligue 1 by the looks of it. Cabaye for 5/6m was a steal!

M'Bengue (left back) should be available for around 6m. Sure Capoue wouldnt be much more than 7. Think he'd be a fantastic signing for us to be honest

Haven't you heard anything coming out of the club?

People even thinking about players they'd like us to sign at 6 or 7m a pop are going to be really disappointed.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: barrysleftfoot on January 06, 2012, 05:05:25 PM


  Capoue is the kind of signing we should be going for.

  Rather than going for a has been like Keane, then why don't we try to get Taiwo on loan.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Shoody on January 06, 2012, 05:21:57 PM
You reckon that Etienne Capoue would only be 7m?  He'd be a great signing.

yeah dont see why not prices are extremely low in Ligue 1 by the looks of it. Cabaye for 5/6m was a steal!

M'Bengue (left back) should be available for around 6m. Sure Capoue wouldnt be much more than 7. Think he'd be a fantastic signing for us to be honest

Haven't you heard anything coming out of the club?

People even thinking about players they'd like us to sign at 6 or 7m a pop are going to be really disappointed.

We were talking about who we'd like to buy if Bent did get sold for around 30m..
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dave on January 06, 2012, 05:41:11 PM
I think Paulie's point still stands.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Shoody on January 06, 2012, 07:05:58 PM
I think Paulie's point still stands.

A point which I addressed in my original post about what types of players we will sign..

Quote
Instead, we'll sell Bent for £22m and sign Keane on loan, Steven Davis and/or Craig Gardner.

An entire page ago...
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TheSandman on January 06, 2012, 07:24:10 PM
I reckon, Collins aside we won't see anyone leave.

My bets on who is coming in are Keane and a cheapo midfielder, probably on loan like Jenas.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Villanation on January 06, 2012, 07:29:51 PM
Looks to me like the transfer window is dead, due mainly to the fact nobody has any money, with the exception of Man City
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Matt Collins on January 06, 2012, 07:51:40 PM
Haha. Very good.

Completely away from us, 'cos we'll never get him. But Redknapp has  just publicly announced that Demba Ba has a release clause (rumoured to be £5m) in his contract.

Wouldn't surprise me as when he signed for West Ham he insisted he got a release on a free clause if they got relegated.

Harry Redknapp. Never one to do his transfer business outside of the press!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: David_Nab on January 06, 2012, 08:00:37 PM
Looks to me like the transfer window is dead, due mainly to the fact nobody has any money, with the exception of Man City

Apparantly have to sell to buy
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Shoody on January 06, 2012, 08:19:03 PM
Looks to me like the transfer window is dead, due mainly to the fact nobody has any money, with the exception of Man City

Apparantly have to sell to buy

Yeah but when Tevez, Onuoha etc have been sold they'll have a decent amount to spend!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: littlevillain on January 06, 2012, 08:44:00 PM
i don't mind bent leaving cus we'll have Keane and Heskey up front banging in the goals.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: john e on January 06, 2012, 08:46:27 PM
Haha. Very good.

Completely away from us, 'cos we'll never get him. But Redknapp has  just publicly announced that Demba Ba has a release clause (rumoured to be £5m) in his contract.

Wouldn't surprise me as when he signed for West Ham he insisted he got a release on a free clause if they got relegated.

Harry Redknapp. Never one to do his transfer business outside of the press!


i reckon Kaka will go to Spurs before the end of the transfer window, with Modric moving to Man utd
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Villanation on January 06, 2012, 09:09:52 PM
Haha. Very good.

Completely away from us, 'cos we'll never get him. But Redknapp has  just publicly announced that Demba Ba has a release clause (rumoured to be £5m) in his contract.

Wouldn't surprise me as when he signed for West Ham he insisted he got a release on a free clause if they got relegated.

Harry Redknapp. Never one to do his transfer business outside of the press!


i reckon Kaka will go to Spurs before the end of the transfer window, with Modric moving to Man utd

My thoughts exactly, think this will be the big move of the window that and Wesley Sneijder going to Man City .
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Shrek on January 06, 2012, 09:18:54 PM
I reckon, Collins aside we won't see anyone leave.

My bets on who is coming in are Keane and a cheapo midfielder, probably on loan like Jenas.

If we sign Keane that's it for loans this season isn't it? Only 2 a season.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Shrek on January 06, 2012, 09:20:04 PM
Haha. Very good.

Completely away from us, 'cos we'll never get him. But Redknapp has  just publicly announced that Demba Ba has a release clause (rumoured to be £5m) in his contract.

Wouldn't surprise me as when he signed for West Ham he insisted he got a release on a free clause if they got relegated.

Harry Redknapp. Never one to do his transfer business outside of the press!


i reckon Kaka will go to Spurs before the end of the transfer window, with Modric moving to Man utd

My thoughts exactly, think this will be the big move of the window that and Wesley Sneijder going to Man City .

I think Man U are more likely to go for Kaka personally, simply because of how big a name he is.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Jimmy Smash on January 06, 2012, 09:29:14 PM
Nah. Kaka's had his best years. SAF doesnt sign players like him. Spurs bound... I'm sure.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: lovejoy on January 06, 2012, 10:03:09 PM
Independent reports that Rooney may be surplus at Man Utd.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: KRS on January 06, 2012, 10:13:26 PM
That would almost be as unbelievably silly as us signing Keane...
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 06, 2012, 10:13:53 PM
Independent reports that Rooney may be surplus at Man Utd.

I don't think they can be getting rid of that sort of quality.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: lovejoy on January 06, 2012, 10:19:39 PM
Cue statement of denial from all parties.

Statement on Wayne Rooney

Issued by Manchester United, Paul Stretford of Triple S Sports and Entertainment Group and Ian Monk Associates
 
Manchester United and Wayne Rooney have been made aware of the theme of an article in tomorrow's Independent newspaper.
 
We have not seen the detail but can assure all United fans that the Manager and the Club are committed to Wayne Rooney and Wayne is committed to the Manager and the Club.
 
The player and the Manager have always had and retain, the utmost respect for each other and look forward to working together in the coming seasons.
 
Any suggestion that Manchester United and Wayne Rooney are to part company is complete nonsense.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Shoody on January 06, 2012, 10:22:27 PM
Nursey just said we want Jonas Olsson to replace Collins
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Shrek on January 06, 2012, 10:26:48 PM
Nursey just said we want Jonas Olsson to replace Collins

I just saw that on Twitter. Yes please
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Somniloquism on January 06, 2012, 10:27:42 PM
Independent reports that Rooney may be surplus at Man Utd.

I know it has been denied but the first thought in my head was "he's after more money already? How much is a super injunction again?"
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Shoody on January 06, 2012, 10:29:27 PM
The article says that QPR have been told £5m for Collins. That money will be reinvested into Jonas. Think Samba will go for a fee close to £5m. Would rather have him. Jonas wouldnt be a terrible choice though.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Phil from the upper holte on January 06, 2012, 10:34:26 PM
Don't rate Jonas, would prefer Samba
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 06, 2012, 10:38:49 PM
IF Samba and Hoilet are going at 15 million for the pair, I really don't care what the wages situation is in the immediate term, we should be in for both as they make sound business sense. One is 21 and obviously on a path to become a top premier league player and will easily profit in 3-4 years time, and the other is a brilliant centre half and a beast from set plays where we struggle. Sell Collins to off-set one of the wages, the others will be covered in the summer when Beye, Heskey and Cuellar are out of contract anyway. I accept the need to get the wages in line, but there is also something about taking the opportunities when they present themselves, and it is damned frustrating that we are not looking to do so.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 06, 2012, 10:43:13 PM
IF Samba and Hoilet are going at 15 million for the pair, I really don't care what the wages situation is in the immediate term, we should be in for both as they make sound business sense. One is 21 and obviously on a path to become a top premier league player and will easily profit in 3-4 years time, and the other is a brilliant centre half and a beast from set plays where we struggle. Sell Collins to off-set one of the wages, the others will be covered in the summer when Beye, Heskey and Cuellar are out of contract anyway. I accept the need to get the wages in line, but there is also something about taking the opportunities when they present themselves, and it is damned frustrating that we are not looking to do so.

Yep forward thinking would dictate that is great business. These big wage players will be gone in the summer and if we can get quality for good value we should be in there.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Colhint on January 06, 2012, 10:44:58 PM
Cue statement of denial from all parties.

Statement on Wayne Rooney

Issued by Manchester United, Paul Stretford of Triple S Sports and Entertainment Group and Ian Monk Associates
 
Manchester United and Wayne Rooney have been made aware of the theme of an article in tomorrow's Independent newspaper.
 
We have not seen the detail but can assure all United fans that the Manager and the Club are committed to Wayne Rooney and Wayne is committed to the Manager and the Club.
 
The player and the Manager have always had and retain, the utmost respect for each other and look forward to working together in the coming seasons.
 
Any suggestion that Manchester United and Wayne Rooney are to part company is complete nonsense.

Right this is my take on it. I think he will leave ManU either this window or the next. I think a deal was done when he briefly asked for a transfer last year when Man City were nosing around. I think the deal was this. You sign a contract now Wayne, we will give you a massive pay rise, which I believe they did. They also agreed he could then be sold. That way Rooney gets another shed load of cash and united can sell him with 3 years left on his contract, probably adding about£25m to his sale fee
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 06, 2012, 10:48:47 PM
That Rhodes kid got 5 tonight. 27 this season. Must be worth a scout.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: lovejoy on January 06, 2012, 10:49:32 PM
I agree Colhint. They did the same with Ronaldo.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 06, 2012, 10:49:40 PM
That Rhodes kid got 5 tonight. 27 this season. Must be worth a scout.

Remarkable isn't it? Spurs are meant to be in for him.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 06, 2012, 10:52:07 PM
Spurs are that London club with a clear strategy in the market and a large scouting system right?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: bertlambshank on January 06, 2012, 10:52:35 PM
That Rhodes kid got 5 tonight. 27 this season. Must be worth a scout.

Remarkable isn't it? Spurs are meant to be in for him.
Jaws and cock Ball were there watching.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 06, 2012, 10:52:52 PM
Apparently so, seems like it would be a good plan to adopt.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Louzie0 on January 06, 2012, 10:53:38 PM
OK, did I miss the post when DW revealed what we could do for the first time?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Somniloquism on January 06, 2012, 10:54:32 PM
That Rhodes kid got 5 tonight. 27 this season. Must be worth a scout.

I see your Rhodes and I raise a Guy Whittingham and a Jermaine Beckford

Although i concede he could also be an Ian Wright or a Dean Ashton.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Somniloquism on January 06, 2012, 10:55:57 PM
OK, did I miss the post when DW revealed what we could do for the first time?


Apparently it was field a team and subs of full internationals or something like that.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 06, 2012, 10:56:34 PM
Or indeed a Darren Bent, or in fairness even a Bobby Zamora. But for 3-4 million it is worth the gamble.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Louzie0 on January 06, 2012, 11:01:40 PM
OK, did I miss the post when DW revealed what we could do for the first time?


Apparently it was field a team and subs of full internationals or something like that.

Thanks Somniloquism. 

really?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 06, 2012, 11:17:22 PM
Yeah it's an indictment of International football really.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Percy McCarthy on January 06, 2012, 11:47:23 PM
And subs.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Louzie0 on January 06, 2012, 11:51:14 PM
Thanks! 
 ;D
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on January 07, 2012, 12:00:46 AM
As a bit of comic relief this was posted on another board today about Redknapp.  It deserves to be true i think

"I have a very good contact who used to work at Tottenham (now works at another Prem club).

At the start of the season Spurs had to submit their list of players for the UEFA Cup. 'Arry's hand written list looked like it had been done by a 6 year old. The writing was spidery and veered off at an angle half way down so that the list looked like a reversed "J".

The list of 25 players included "Dazza" instead of Danny Rose and "Benwar" for Benoit Assou-Ekotto. Only 23 players were listed. Nunbers 24 and 25 had "Ask Joe?" written next to them"
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: eastie on January 07, 2012, 07:13:25 AM
Interesting,
http://www.liverpoolfc.tv/news/media-watch/liverpool-deal-for-bent-is-done
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dante Lavelli on January 07, 2012, 07:23:52 AM
Interesting,
http://www.liverpoolfc.tv/news/media-watch/liverpool-deal-for-bent-is-done

wow, de ja vu.  I'm sure I read this a minute ago.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Villa-Villan on January 07, 2012, 08:24:32 AM
It's the Mirror so don't take it seriously.


"Aston Villa are moving for West Brom star Jonas Olsson as they prepare to sell fellow centre-back James Collins.

Welsh international Collins is up for sale, and QPR have been told they can have him for £5million.

Villa boss Alex McLeish, who has to sell before he can buy, wants to then reinvest the Collins cash in Olsson.

The Swede, 28, only has 18 months left on his contract at The Hawthorns and has failed to agree a new deal.

Albion are now reluctantly considering cashing in on him rather than risk his value plummeting.

If Villa can shift £40,000-a-week Collins, they could get Olsson on cheaper terms. "

http://www.mirrorfootball.co.uk/transfer-news/Transfer-gossip-exclusive-Aston-Villa-want-Jonas-Olsson-of-West-Brom-to-replace-QPR-target-James-Collins-article849838.html
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: myf on January 07, 2012, 09:56:54 AM
Is he the geezer who got herd sent off?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: barrysleftfoot on January 07, 2012, 10:02:44 AM

  I'd go for Huth instead.

  If Bent goes though i would be interested in Long tbh.Have been very impressed with him this season.

  The only thing about Jordan Rhodes, is will it stifle the development of Weimann, who whenever i have seen him play looks very good.

  Would love Capoue.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: CJ on January 07, 2012, 10:22:02 AM
Is he the geezer who got herd sent off?

Yep.

Although to be fair Phil Dowd was more at fault than Olsson
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dave on January 07, 2012, 10:57:32 AM
Is he the geezer who got herd sent off?

Yep.

Although to be fair Phil Dowd was more at fault than Olsson
And to be fair, Darren Cann was more at fault than Phil Dowd.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 07, 2012, 11:21:10 AM
Interesting,
http://www.liverpoolfc.tv/news/media-watch/liverpool-deal-for-bent-is-done

Putting that on an official site is disgraceful and I hope Villa will be complaining.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: VillaAlways on January 07, 2012, 11:24:29 AM
They really are a revolting club. If Villa sell after this I'll be pissed off
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Irish villain on January 07, 2012, 11:26:43 AM
Liverpool have always been my least favourite side and each year my dislike of them intensifies.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: OzVilla on January 07, 2012, 11:33:29 AM
It's the holier than thou, sanctimonious, divine right type of attitude that I despise them for.  Absolutely horrible club. 

Happy to bring up the Hillsboro tragedy at the drop of a hat but seem to have a collective amnesia when it comes to Hysel.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 07, 2012, 12:26:33 PM
Interesting,
http://www.liverpoolfc.tv/news/media-watch/liverpool-deal-for-bent-is-done

Putting that on an official site is disgraceful and I hope Villa will be complaining.

Agreed, typical of the club.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: frankmosswasmyuncle on January 07, 2012, 12:35:33 PM
Is he the geezer who got herd sent off?
And said on MOTD that Herd had stamped on him.
Lying twat!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Somniloquism on January 07, 2012, 12:38:02 PM
Interesting,
http://www.liverpoolfc.tv/news/media-watch/liverpool-deal-for-bent-is-done

Putting that on an official site is disgraceful and I hope Villa will be complaining.

Whilst recently that club has been a disgrace, I would say that all they have done under a section called transfer gossip is list gossip about liverpool in the papers. We dso the same ourselves under the news, media watch and so do the BBC, the only diffence is that they show the whole story rather then just the details.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: citizenDJ on January 07, 2012, 01:01:20 PM
All in the past now, I suppose, but Phil Thompson just said on Soccer Saturday that Houllier said he had Cabaye all lined up for four million, but the board wouldn't stump up the cash for him.

I have now adjusted my expectations from 'not very high' to 'lousy'.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 07, 2012, 01:07:15 PM
All in the past now, I suppose, but Phil Thompson just said on Soccer Saturday that Houllier said he had Cabaye all lined up for four million, but the board wouldn't stump up the cash for him.

I have now adjusted my expectations from 'not very high' to 'lousy'.

Well if that's true that was a terrible terrible decision by the board.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dave on January 07, 2012, 01:18:01 PM
All in the past now, I suppose, but Phil Thompson just said on Soccer Saturday that Houllier said he had Cabaye all lined up for four million, but the board wouldn't stump up the cash for him.

I have now adjusted my expectations from 'not very high' to 'lousy'.

Well if that's true that was a terrible terrible decision by the board.
Cabaye himself said that he was probably going to be joining if Houllier had stayed with us.

So I'd say it's more that the board were happy for Houllier to sign him if he had stayed.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JUAN PABLO on January 07, 2012, 01:18:38 PM
IF Samba and Hoilet are going at 15 million for the pair, I really don't care what the wages situation is in the immediate term, we should be in for both as they make sound business sense. 

its depressing when you think we were once forking that out for sidwell and Curtis Davis ...
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 07, 2012, 01:21:38 PM
All in the past now, I suppose, but Phil Thompson just said on Soccer Saturday that Houllier said he had Cabaye all lined up for four million, but the board wouldn't stump up the cash for him.

I have now adjusted my expectations from 'not very high' to 'lousy'.

Well if that's true that was a terrible terrible decision by the board.
Cabaye himself said that he was probably going to be joining if Houllier had stayed with us.

So I'd say it's more that the board were happy for Houllier to sign him if he had stayed.

That's fair enough then, it's a shame we didn't get him.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JUAN PABLO on January 07, 2012, 01:22:50 PM
That Rhodes kid got 5 tonight. 27 this season. Must be worth a scout.

I see your Rhodes and I raise a Guy Whittingham and a Jermaine Beckford

Although i concede he could also be an Ian Wright or a Dean Ashton.


worth a gamble for me

would defonz score that many goals in that league . no , so he would be better than what we have .
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JUAN PABLO on January 07, 2012, 01:24:49 PM
Liverpool have always been my least favourite side and each year my dislike of them intensifies.

Im with you on that
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Shrek on January 07, 2012, 01:50:10 PM
That Rhodes kid got 5 tonight. 27 this season. Must be worth a scout.

I see your Rhodes and I raise a Guy Whittingham and a Jermaine Beckford

Although i concede he could also be an Ian Wright or a Dean Ashton.


worth a gamble for me

would defonz score that many goals in that league . no , so he would be better than what we have .

Silly statement to make.

Firstly Fonz could score that many in the lower leagues, we don't know.

And second Rhodes could be a Beckford who, is no better than Fonz.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: darren woolley on January 07, 2012, 02:39:46 PM
I would like us to take a gamble on Rhodes.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 07, 2012, 02:46:27 PM
I would like us to take a gamble on Rhodes.

I'd prefer to take a chance on Lesbos. 
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Irish villain on January 07, 2012, 03:10:28 PM
All in the past now, I suppose, but Phil Thompson just said on Soccer Saturday that Houllier said he had Cabaye all lined up for four million, but the board wouldn't stump up the cash for him.

I have now adjusted my expectations from 'not very high' to 'lousy'.

Well if that's true that was a terrible terrible decision by the board.
Cabaye himself said that he was probably going to be joining if Houllier had stayed with us.

So I'd say it's more that the board were happy for Houllier to sign him if he had stayed.

That's fair enough then, it's a shame we didn't get him.

As with Robbie Keane we will probably land him in 12 years time....Will he join Robbie, Juninho and Benni McCarthy among the great 'what ifs' of Aston Villa transfer history?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 07, 2012, 03:15:09 PM
*edit* Never mind, someone beat me to it.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Tom wintle on January 07, 2012, 03:48:55 PM
http://avillafan.com/site/2012/01/07/mystery_deal_to_buy_villa/#comment-1783

if u look at the reasons it does make sense.

what would you think about wealthy owners?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: The Laughing Policeman on January 07, 2012, 04:01:19 PM
http://avillafan.com/site/2012/01/07/mystery_deal_to_buy_villa/#comment-1783

if u look at the reasons it does make sense.

what would you think about wealthy owners?
The writer of that piece is Dave Beeston. Who's he?
And no thanks. Glory should be earned and not bought at any price.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: eastie on January 07, 2012, 04:09:12 PM
http://avillafan.com/site/2012/01/07/mystery_deal_to_buy_villa/#comment-1783

if u look at the reasons it does make sense.

what would you think about wealthy owners?

If true i would love it , blowing man city and utd out of the water and getting the top world stars in claret and blue would be marvellous after so many barren years , we may even tempt greg down to the ground , bring it on -enjoy it while it lasts mancini coz jose mourinho s claret and blues are coming to get you!

Now where did put that other bottle?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: WALTERS WARRIORS on January 07, 2012, 04:16:25 PM
I have been following this "The man that can" and i have to tell myself it cannot be possibly true. Cause if it did not happen i would be even more depressed than i am already ..........PS. People who say they would not like Villa to end up like Man CIty get real. My mate of 20yrs who is a Man City fan has never been so happy he even goes up the bar on a regular basis now !!!!!!!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Tom wintle on January 07, 2012, 04:22:36 PM
I have been following this "The man that can" and i have to tell myself it cannot be possibly true. Cause if it did not happen i would be even more depressed than i am already ..........PS. People who say they would not like Villa to end up like Man CIty get real. My mate of 20yrs who is a Man City fan has never been so happy he even goes up the bar on a regular basis now !!!!!!!
we are quite like the old city at the moment mid table not going any were i seem to remember city being in that positon
look at these reasons
1. Randy has scrapped plans to re-develop the North Stand.
2. The wage bill has been cut by nearly £500k p/w
3. 17 players left in last summers window.
4. Randy not being as present at Villa Park as he used to
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: eastie on January 07, 2012, 04:25:32 PM
I have been following this "The man that can" and i have to tell myself it cannot be possibly true. Cause if it did not happen i would be even more depressed than i am already ..........PS. People who say they would not like Villa to end up like Man CIty get real. My mate of 20yrs who is a Man City fan has never been so happy he even goes up the bar on a regular basis now !!!!!!!
we are quite like the old city at the moment mid table not going any were i seem to remember city being in that positon
look at these reasons
1. Randy has scrapped plans to re-develop the North Stand.
2. The wage bill has been cut by nearly £500k p/w
3. 17 players left in last summers window.
4. Randy not being as present at Villa Park as he used to

No problem seeing why randy would sell, but why would they want to buy us ? Hope it happens though
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: CJ on January 07, 2012, 04:34:40 PM
http://avillafan.com/site/2012/01/07/mystery_deal_to_buy_villa/#comment-1783

if u look at the reasons it does make sense.

what would you think about wealthy owners?

If true i would love it , blowing man city and utd out of the water and getting the top world stars in claret and blue would be marvellous after so many barren years , we may even tempt greg down to the ground , bring it on -enjoy it while it lasts mancini coz jose mourinho s claret and blues are coming to get you!

Now where did put that other bottle?

Squillionaires buying Villa is one thing but that bit is just being silly  ;)
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: WALTERS WARRIORS on January 07, 2012, 04:40:05 PM
I have been following this "The man that can" and i have to tell myself it cannot be possibly true. Cause if it did not happen i would be even more depressed than i am already ..........PS. People who say they would not like Villa to end up like Man CIty get real. My mate of 20yrs who is a Man City fan has never been so happy he even goes up the bar on a regular basis now !!!!!!!
we are quite like the old city at the moment mid table not going any were i seem to remember city being in that positon
look at these reasons
1. Randy has scrapped plans to re-develop the North Stand.
2. The wage bill has been cut by nearly £500k p/w
3. 17 players left in last summers window.
4. Randy not being as present at Villa Park as he used to

No problem seeing why randy would sell, but why would they want to buy us ? Hope it happens though

Man City could of asked the same question eastie ? I am trying to get this out of my mind but i remember when Man City took over days before the transfer window and my mate was telling me Man City are willing to splash £150m !!!!!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Matt Collins on January 07, 2012, 08:56:47 PM
That all has the distinct air of utter bollocks. But god damn you I still got a little bit excited.

Having said that, after Mystery Man's rumours over the summer I'm going to exit this thread and believe it when I see it.

Hasn't Lerner expressly denied the selling on rumours?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 07, 2012, 09:01:53 PM
http://avillafan.com/site/2012/01/07/mystery_deal_to_buy_villa/#comment-1783

if u look at the reasons it does make sense.

what would you think about wealthy owners?

I think if someone's coming on here to plug another site they could at least ask us first.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: James on January 07, 2012, 09:12:52 PM
Espanyol and Villareal could get Cuellar this month according to one of today's tabloids ... probably rubbish then, but just passing it on! The same rag has us chasing a player from AZ in Holland called Brett Holman, an Aussie. Yeah, right!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Jimmy Smash on January 07, 2012, 09:59:51 PM
Maybe "The One Armed Man" is going to buy us.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mister E on January 07, 2012, 10:10:48 PM
Maybe "The One Armed Man" is going to buy us.
Sounds like a bit of a bandit to me.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: lovejoy on January 07, 2012, 10:14:08 PM
That all has the distinct air of utter bollocks. But god damn you I still got a little bit excited.

Having said that, after Mystery Man's rumours over the summer I'm going to exit this thread and believe it when I see it.

Hasn't Lerner expressly denied the selling on rumours?

The same Lerner who had a 5 year plan?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: IRISHPHIL on January 07, 2012, 10:16:31 PM
sell bent to liverpool and buy jordan rhodes
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: luke25 on January 07, 2012, 10:25:03 PM
sell bent to liverpool and buy jordan rhodes
Keep Bent and buy Jordan Rhodes.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Jimmy Smash on January 07, 2012, 10:25:31 PM
That all has the distinct air of utter bollocks. But god damn you I still got a little bit excited.

Having said that, after Mystery Man's rumours over the summer I'm going to exit this thread and believe it when I see it.

Hasn't Lerner expressly denied the selling on rumours?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 07, 2012, 10:27:36 PM
Even though there isn't, wasn't, and never will be one.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 07, 2012, 10:30:11 PM
Sorry, I think I may have cocked someone's post up.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Tony on January 07, 2012, 10:31:12 PM
Espanyol and Villareal could get Cuellar this month according to one of today's tabloids ... probably rubbish then, but just passing it on! The same rag has us chasing a player from AZ in Holland called Brett Holman, an Aussie. Yeah, right!

I can't imagine Carlos Cuellar playing in the Spanish league, he just hasn't got the quality of passing they like, he is a half decent centre half, but not what you expect to see in Spain.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on January 07, 2012, 11:24:53 PM
I've heard all the reports of Randy not going anywhere and so on but I'm still hoping there's something to the QIA rumour and the way things are happening or have happened in the last year or so I could well believe we're being packaged to sell. Just my opinion.
The postion he is in now and what he is capable of I believe he would consider a decent offer from the right people.

I feel a little bit disappointed in myself for thinking that way but fuck it. I may as well hope for some outrageous fortune for my club because that's what it takes now unfortunately.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Lowendbehold on January 07, 2012, 11:37:43 PM
Sell Bent and offer his wages to Demba Ba and the £10m buy out clause in his contract, before someone else does.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on January 07, 2012, 11:42:51 PM
We cant sign Ba.  Dunne, Collins and Keane would spend all night and day at him.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 07, 2012, 11:43:48 PM
Espanyol and Villareal could get Cuellar this month according to one of today's tabloids ... probably rubbish then, but just passing it on! The same rag has us chasing a player from AZ in Holland called Brett Holman, an Aussie. Yeah, right!

I can't imagine Carlos Cuellar playing in the Spanish league, he just hasn't got the quality of passing they like, he is a half decent centre half, but not what you expect to see in Spain.

I like Carlos, but he's the only Spanish male on the planet who can't control a football.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Jimmy Smash on January 07, 2012, 11:50:02 PM
I think we can safely assume that Randy is balancing the books to sell. The good egg that he is, he is leaving the club in the best possible position... i.e paying back the debt (to his own company of course) so that a buyer can come in with a clean slate. Fair play to him... he always said he wa only a custodian of this great club. Hopefully he'll show sound judgement in selecting an appropriate buyer. That means no Indian chicken farmers.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 08, 2012, 12:10:18 AM
I think we can safely assume that Randy is balancing the books to sell. The good egg that he is, he is leaving the club in the best possible position... i.e paying back the debt (to his own company of course) so that a buyer can come in with a clean slate. Fair play to him... he always said he wa only a custodian of this great club. Hopefully he'll show sound judgement in selecting an appropriate buyer. That means no Indian chicken farmers.

How do you work that out?

I reckon he's balancing the books because he's lost interest (not bothered turning up much this year) and he's had enough of investing in it.

There's not a single shred of credible evidence that anyone is going to buy the club, no matter how much we want it to happen.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Jimmy Smash on January 08, 2012, 12:14:00 AM
I think we can safely assume that Randy is balancing the books to sell. The good egg that he is, he is leaving the club in the best possible position... i.e paying back the debt (to his own company of course) so that a buyer can come in with a clean slate. Fair play to him... he always said he wa only a custodian of this great club. Hopefully he'll show sound judgement in selecting an appropriate buyer. That means no Indian chicken farmers.

How do you work that out?

I reckon he's balancing the books because he's lost interest (not bothered turning up much this year) and he's had enough of investing in it.

There's not a single shred of credible evidence that anyone is going to buy the club, no matter how much we want it to happen.

Because I think he's only ever had the best interest of AVFC at heart. He's selling the assets to balance the books. That will make the club more attractive to responsible buyers. I'm quite happy to sit back and let time either prove or disprove my theory.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 08, 2012, 12:22:17 AM
So how can we "safely assume" anything at all in that?

And people seem to be talking about some bunch of Qataris and getting excited - they're not getting excited because they think they're going to be prudent, they're getitng excited because they think they're going to spunk money over us in a frenzied attempt to buy trophies. If that's the case, how bothered are they going to be about the wage bill when they buy the club?

Don't get me wrong, I'd love nothing more than Randy to sell to someone who wants to spaff money all over us, but there's not a single shred of evidence to suggest that that is what is going to happen - let alone anything to merit assuming anything.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: kippaxvilla2 on January 08, 2012, 12:31:05 AM
So how can we "safely assume" anything at all in that?

And people seem to be talking about some bunch of Qataris and getting excited - they're not getting excited because they think they're going to be prudent, they're getitng excited because they think they're going to spunk money over us in a frenzied attempt to buy trophies. If that's the case, how bothered are they going to be about the wage bill when they buy the club?

Don't get me wrong, I'd love nothing more than Randy to sell to someone who wants to spaff money all over us, but there's not a single shred of evidence to suggest that that is what is going to happen - let alone anything to merit assuming anything.

And even if it were true, knowing Villa they would manage to sell to someone called Quatarmanton Investments Ltd, Chairman Sheik Eldoug Ellis.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Irish villain on January 08, 2012, 12:33:54 AM
Even though there isn't, wasn't, and never will be one.

Dave, I have a feeling you will be busy debunking this myth so long as RL (not RAL by the way!) owns Aston Villa!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Jimmy Smash on January 08, 2012, 12:35:46 AM
So how can we "safely assume" anything at all in that?

And people seem to be talking about some bunch of Qataris and getting excited - they're not getting excited because they think they're going to be prudent, they're getitng excited because they think they're going to spunk money over us in a frenzied attempt to buy trophies. If that's the case, how bothered are they going to be about the wage bill when they buy the club?

Don't get me wrong, I'd love nothing more than Randy to sell to someone who wants to spaff money all over us, but there's not a single shred of evidence to suggest that that is what is going to happen - let alone anything to merit assuming anything.

I never mentioned Quataris... Just that i thought the club was being prepared to be sold. I didn't even mention big spenders... just that I thought Randy would sell to responsible buyers. As I said, I'm happy for time to tell.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: VillaSpen on January 08, 2012, 12:45:03 AM
http://avillafan.com/site/2012/01/07/mystery_deal_to_buy_villa/#comment-1783

Did reading that make anyone else's eyes go funny? And not in a good way.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Jimmy Smash on January 08, 2012, 12:46:49 AM
Even though there isn't, wasn't, and never will be one.

So Aston Villa is the only business in the western world that underwent a major organisational change and didn't have a plan for the subsequent 5 years?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 08, 2012, 12:51:56 AM
Even though there isn't, wasn't, and never will be one.

So Aston Villa is the only business in the western world that underwent a major organisational change and didn't have a plan for the subsequent 5 years?


I don't know how every business in the western world conducts its operations. Do you? In fact, can you name another football club where the phrase 'five year plan' is bandied about by supporters to the point of obsession?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Jimmy Smash on January 08, 2012, 01:05:00 AM
Even though there isn't, wasn't, and never will be one.

So Aston Villa is the only business in the western world that underwent a major organisational change and didn't have a plan for the subsequent 5 years?


I don't know how every business in the western world conducts its operations. Do you? In fact, can you name another football club where the phrase 'five year plan' is bandied about by supporters to the point of obsession?

Of course I don't. But I know that if a business is undergoing a major organisational change, and requires significant financial backing, then it should have a 3-5 year plan. I can't believe that RAL didn't have one, being a modern forward thinking company... and one that expected to succeed rather than fail.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Risso on January 08, 2012, 01:08:45 AM
Even though there isn't, wasn't, and never will be one.

So Aston Villa is the only business in the western world that underwent a major organisational change and didn't have a plan for the subsequent 5 years?


I don't know how every business in the western world conducts its operations. Do you? In fact, can you name another football club where the phrase 'five year plan' is bandied about by supporters to the point of obsession?

If it hadn't been mentioned by not one, but two Aston Villa directors, then it wouldn't get mentioned as much by supporters.  I don't think "the plan"was ever much more than a desire to qualify for the Champions League within five years, but that was what they were definitely aiming at.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 08, 2012, 01:09:00 AM
Even though there isn't, wasn't, and never will be one.

So Aston Villa is the only business in the western world that underwent a major organisational change and didn't have a plan for the subsequent 5 years?


I don't know how every business in the western world conducts its operations. Do you? In fact, can you name another football club where the phrase 'five year plan' is bandied about by supporters to the point of obsession?

Of course I don't. But I know that if a business is undergoing a major organisational change, and requires significant financial backing, then it should have a 3-5 year plan. I can't believe that RAL didn't have one, being a modern forward thinking company... and one that expected to succeed rather than fail.

Richard FitzGerald talked about where he wanted us to be in five years, but that was about it. You can't have fixed plans in football - there are too many variables.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Jimmy Smash on January 08, 2012, 01:17:18 AM
Even though there isn't, wasn't, and never will be one.

So Aston Villa is the only business in the western world that underwent a major organisational change and didn't have a plan for the subsequent 5 years?


I don't know how every business in the western world conducts its operations. Do you? In fact, can you name another football club where the phrase 'five year plan' is bandied about by supporters to the point of obsession?

Of course I don't. But I know that if a business is undergoing a major organisational change, and requires significant financial backing, then it should have a 3-5 year plan. I can't believe that RAL didn't have one, being a modern forward thinking company... and one that expected to succeed rather than fail.

Richard FitzGerald talked about where he wanted us to be in five years, but that was about it. You can't have fixed plans in football - there are too many variables.

Both The General and Fitzgerald talked of a 5 year plan. No business the size of Villa would get investment without a medium term plan. A football club is like any other business... it needs to plan for its future. Just because three are variables it doesn't mean that clubs are given money willy-nilly. Any prospective investor would need to see a plan (and that includes RAL). The fact that the variables are great is the reason that clubs at present struggle to attract investors. Try telling apotential football investor that there are no plans because the variables are too great. You'd be laughed out of the meeting.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 08, 2012, 01:21:26 AM
Which investors are these?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Risso on January 08, 2012, 01:23:53 AM
Randy also gave the interview a couple of years ago where he said:

"When we set out to build the club we expected year four to mean more modest spending than year three. I'm thinking more in terms of what we had planned to do, rather than checking to see if a bank account has less money in it, or whether I feel the squad is fine the way it is."
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Jimmy Smash on January 08, 2012, 01:26:17 AM
Which investors are these?

You think Randy sat at home and worked it all out with a beer and a fag packet? He expressed an interest in the club... his team looked at us and presented a business case to him. This would have included where the club could be over a fixed period of time. He would have looked at the potential, the variables, and then decided whether or not to invest his money (under the company name RAL) RAL were the investors.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 08, 2012, 01:27:58 AM
Which investors are these?

You think Randy sat at home and worked it all out with a beer and a fag packet? He expressed an interest in the club... his team looked at us and presented a business case to him. This would have included where the club could be over a fixed period of time. He would have looked at the potential, the variables, and then decided whether or not to invest his money (under the company name RAL) RAL were the investors.

I daresay he did look at every option., In fact, I know for a fact that he did. But the idea that there was some rigid five year plan covering events on and off the pitch is a fallacy.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Jimmy Smash on January 08, 2012, 01:35:36 AM
Which investors are these?

You think Randy sat at home and worked it all out with a beer and a fag packet? He expressed an interest in the club... his team looked at us and presented a business case to him. This would have included where the club could be over a fixed period of time. He would have looked at the potential, the variables, and then decided whether or not to invest his money (under the company name RAL) RAL were the investors.

I daresay he did look at every option., In fact, I know for a fact that he did. But the idea that there was some rigid five year plan covering events on and off the pitch is a fallacy.

Dave... sorry mate, but you're talking bollocks. A rigid 5 year plan is the least any company of that size would have in place. There would also be a risk assessment for every year of that 5 years following the purchase of the company. Involved in this would be the threat of relegation and even winning the Champions League. Yearly spending would also be planned for.  Do you think MON asked for money for Milner and Randy reached down the back of the sofa? They aren't amateurs,, despite how it may appear sometimes.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Risso on January 08, 2012, 01:35:37 AM
Which investors are these?

You think Randy sat at home and worked it all out with a beer and a fag packet? He expressed an interest in the club... his team looked at us and presented a business case to him. This would have included where the club could be over a fixed period of time. He would have looked at the potential, the variables, and then decided whether or not to invest his money (under the company name RAL) RAL were the investors.

I daresay he did look at every option., In fact, I know for a fact that he did. But the idea that there was some rigid five year plan covering events on and off the pitch is a fallacy.

I haven't seen anybody other than you use the term "rigid" to describe the plan.  You have stated categorically that there wasn't a five year plan.  It doesn't have to be a formal 2,000 page Powerpoint presentation to exist.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 08, 2012, 01:37:08 AM
Okay, if I'm talking "bollocks" what was it? And when Paul Faulkner denied its existence last year, what does that indicate?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Risso on January 08, 2012, 01:39:34 AM
Okay, if I'm talking "bollocks" what was it? And when Paul Faulkner denied its existence last year, what does that indicate?

That Paul Faulkner is utterly useless, and has been promoted way, way above his ability.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 08, 2012, 01:42:16 AM
I'm willing to bet there was on off field business plan. But while there may be targets that a club would like to achieve within a certain time frame on the field, I doubt any club has what any of us would class as a traditional business plan for on field.
Apart from maybe Man City which is to win everything by spending until you win everything.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Jimmy Smash on January 08, 2012, 01:42:24 AM
Sorry Dave, I can't explain myself any clearer. The reasonable thing would be to accept that a business of this size has a firm plan. One that has undergone organisational change and seeks financial investment needs to show one for 5 years. It a simple business concept.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 08, 2012, 01:44:36 AM
I'm willing to bet there was on off field business plan. But while their may be targets that a club would like to achieve within a certain time frame on the field, I doubt any club has what any of us would class as a business plan for on field. Apart from maybe Man City which is to win everything buy spending until you win everything.

Which is my feelings on the subject. There would have been corporate plans to cover probably every forseeable timescale, but the sort that would be of interest to the average supporter don't exist. 
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: kippaxvilla2 on January 08, 2012, 01:45:08 AM
Okay, if I'm talking "bollocks" what was it? And when Paul Faulkner denied its existence last year, what does that indicate?

That Paul Faulkner is utterly useless, and has been promoted way, way above his ability.

The fact that he has produced no strategy for success whatsoever is all you need to know about him.  If ever there was a worse example of a pen pusher being over promoted beyond belief I'd like to see it.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 08, 2012, 01:48:21 AM
Damn my spelling was bad in that post!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Jimmy Smash on January 08, 2012, 01:49:26 AM
I'm willing to bet there was on off field business plan. But while their may be targets that a club would like to achieve within a certain time frame on the field, I doubt any club has what any of us would class as a business plan for on field. Apart from maybe Man City which is to win everything buy spending until you win everything.

Which is my feelings on the subject. There would have been corporate plans to cover probably every forseeable timescale, but the sort that would be of interest to the average supporter don't exist.

And that is why... other than to sheiks and oligarchs... football clubs are such a bad investment. Any other business can reasonably guarantee that good management will produce favourable returns. Unfortunately good management off field is no guarantee of good results on field in football.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 08, 2012, 01:51:49 AM
I'm willing to bet there was on off field business plan. But while their may be targets that a club would like to achieve within a certain time frame on the field, I doubt any club has what any of us would class as a business plan for on field. Apart from maybe Man City which is to win everything buy spending until you win everything.

Which is my feelings on the subject. There would have been corporate plans to cover probably every forseeable timescale, but the sort that would be of interest to the average supporter don't exist.

And that is why... other than to sheiks and oligarchs... football clubs are such a bad investment. Any other business can reasonably guarantee that good management will produce favourable returns. Unfortunately good management off field is no guarantee of good results on field.

That and your assets risking never being able to work again every day. 
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: KevinGage on January 08, 2012, 05:42:17 AM
Silly season in full effect:


 clicky (http://www.people.co.uk/sport/football/football-hotline/2012/01/08/spurs-plan-swoop-for-aston-villa-defender-james-collins-102039-23687258/)

Quote

Spurs plan swoop for Aston Villa defender James Collins
Jan 8 2012 by Dean Jones, The People


SPURS are planning to challenge QPR for the signature of James Collins – should they miss out on No.1 target Chris Samba.

Aston Villa are willing to let central-defender Collins leave for offers more than £3million this month.

Rangers boss Neil Warnock has made the first move but Harry Redknapp’s club are keeping an eye on the situation.

Giant

Collins, 28, would welcome a move back to London, where he spent four years with West Ham.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: KevinGage on January 08, 2012, 05:48:50 AM
Fits with Tottingham's policy of being linked with EVERY player who may be on the move at this time of the year, I suppose.

The same paper suggests Fulham are trying to get Huddlestone on loan. 
If he's available, that's one of their reserves/ fringe players I wouldn't actually mind seeing in c&b.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: kippaxvilla2 on January 08, 2012, 09:43:35 AM
Silly season in full effect:


 clicky (http://www.people.co.uk/sport/football/football-hotline/2012/01/08/spurs-plan-swoop-for-aston-villa-defender-james-collins-102039-23687258/)

Quote

Spurs plan swoop for Aston Villa defender James Collins
Jan 8 2012 by Dean Jones, The People


SPURS are planning to challenge QPR for the signature of James Collins – should they miss out on No.1 target Chris Samba.

Aston Villa are willing to let central-defender Collins leave for offers more than £3million this month.

Rangers boss Neil Warnock has made the first move but Harry Redknapp’s club are keeping an eye on the situation.

Giant

Collins, 28, would welcome a move back to London, where he spent four years with West Ham.

They bought in Friedel - suppose he was free.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dave on January 08, 2012, 09:53:08 AM
They bought in Friedel - suppose he was free.
Friedel was still one of the best keepers in the league.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: kippaxvilla2 on January 08, 2012, 09:59:49 AM
I didn't think that Bent had been sulking and looking for a move.

The Andy Gray Column: Darren Bent's future, the Alex McLeish impact and Bobby Zamora link
Jan 8 2012 by Andy Gray, Sunday Mercury

 
TALK about England striker Darren Bent seeking a new challenge away from Villa Park in the January transfer window is not right in my opinion.

It has only been a year since Darren signed for big bucks from Sunderland and moved to Aston Villa, so I am sorry but no, he shouldn’t be thinking of going elsewhere – it’s insulting to the fans and the club.

My advice to Darren would be to just get on with it this season because he hasn’t been his usual prolific self and he owes Aston Villa more time and more goals – that’s for sure.

He signed a four-and-a-half-year deal to stay in the Midlands and Villa will undoubtedly be paying him a lot of money for his services – I think he must show his loyalty and his quality.

Just because things aren’t going completely your way at the moment that is no reason to start sulking and thinking about upping sticks.

He needs to keep his head up and help his team work their way through it and start scoring more goals, he needs to stop thinking about leaving.

The club has had a difficult season and it has not been helped by a lack of goals from Darren – he needs to work hard and help the club enjoy a positive finish to the campaign.

Villa need someone to step up to the plate in the striking department right now that is for sure and maybe adding Robbie Keane to the squad on loan from LA Galaxy in the short-term could help re-ignite the club – and Darren.

If Arsenal can loan-in Thierry Henry for January and February and Everton adopt a similar approach with Landon Donovan – why can’t Villa parachute in Keane from America to add some much needed attacking impetus and flair?

Alex McLeish needs to get in some people that can score some goals and Robbie clearly has that talent. You only have to look at his track record in the Premier League – he scores goals at this level.

I just hope Robbie has still got the hunger so we will have to wait and see as to what happens with that.

Alex is under a bit of pressure and has been from day one because of where he came from to take over at Villa.

Yes, he won the League Cup with Birmingham but he also got them relegated before he was offered the Villa job.

A lot of Villa fans couldn’t work that out but I hope he gets some success because I like Alex and I know him well.

He needs to win over the fans before they can even think about having success as a club. He can’t work unless everyone is pulling in the same direction and that’s why it’s crucial Darren starts scoring heavily and allows the fans to buy into the team again.

Every manager needs to spend money and craft their own team – and Alex is no different at Aston Villa. Will he get backing from Villa Park board in January financially? I don’t know, but I think he needs some help.

I think he’ll be looking at one or two players on permanent deals, outside of loaning Robbie.

There is talk of Fulham’s Bobby Zamora and I think he would be a really good signing for Villa.

He would be a nice combination with Darren, a good complement.

I think they need a bit of strength at the top end, they might need a bit of strength in midfield too but I think they’re okay at the back and in goal.

I think the middle of midfield and at the top end of the pitch are the areas where Alex would welcome some more bodies with quality.

I think Alex can be a little pragmatic but not negative, maybe just cautious, in the way he sets up teams sometimes.

But Villa fans look for a little bit more than that. They want more adventure from their team.

Villa fans are still getting to know Alex and he’s getting to know them – January could be crucial for the club though.

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Jimmy Smash on January 08, 2012, 10:53:53 AM
Any Gray talks sense shock.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Irish villain on January 08, 2012, 11:35:48 AM
I'm sure you guys all heard McLeish deny Liverpool interest in Bent?

http://www.espn.co.uk/football/sport/story/129794.html
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Legion on January 08, 2012, 12:43:31 PM
Liverpool have just offered £25 million plus Andy Carroll for Darren Bent. Villa have rejected it, saying they only want the money.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Pete3206 on January 08, 2012, 12:54:41 PM
From OS:

Quote
Alex McLeish hopes to have Robbie Keane signed, sealed and delivered as a claret and blue loan player by Monday.

McLeish revealed after the FA Cup win at Bristol Rovers that the Keane deal was nearing completion.

Villa boss McLeish is just waiting to get the move rubber-stamped.

Keane would be signing a short-term two-month contract at Villa, with the MLS season on hiatus.

McLeish said: "There's red tape and it's about cutting through that.

"We did hope we could have with him with us on Monday morning.

"We're just waiting for clearance now.

"If Sharon, the club secretary, gets the green light he should be here Sunday night for Monday morning."

McLeish also reiterated the club stance on Darren Bent after the third round victory.

The Villa boss revealed he had spoken to Liverpool manager Kenny Dalglish about the ongoing and wild internet speculation linking Bent with Anfield.

He was happy with the response of Dalglish, who reiterated that "there's nothing in it."

McLeish added: "It's not frustrating. It's just the window. It's good fun. I'm not frustrated by it.

"People like to speculate, social networks, it's a field day.

"Anyone that's out there that want Benty certainly haven't contacted me.

"Benty has said on the record that he wants to stay at the club. You have to take his word for that.

"Certainly anyone I have asked outside the club - agents etc - is there an interest I have been told flatly no.

"I have spoken to Kenny and he said there's nothing in it. He said - just because Mark Lawrenson said something it doesn't mean it's true.

"That kind of stuff you can't prevent it. It's out of my control. I don't get upset by it."
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: KRS on January 08, 2012, 12:56:14 PM
Liverpool have just offered £25 million plus Andy Carroll for Darren Bent. Villa have rejected it, saying they only want the money.
Well thats the kind of deal I would snap their hands off for to be honest...but if thats their first offer then another £5-10m could be added to that. Carroll is more likely to score goals for Villa under than AM than Bent is I'm afraid. Two different types of player but I would say that an in form Carroll is equally as good (if not better) than an in form Bent.

Is there any evidence of this offer?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rigadon on January 08, 2012, 12:56:41 PM
I like the line about Lawrenson. 
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rigadon on January 08, 2012, 12:57:31 PM
Liverpool have just offered £25 million plus Andy Carroll for Darren Bent. Villa have rejected it, saying they only want the money.

Source???
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Clampy on January 08, 2012, 01:03:02 PM
Liverpool have just offered £25 million plus Andy Carroll for Darren Bent. Villa have rejected it, saying they only want the money.

Source???

I think it may have been a joke at the expense of Andy Carroll.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rigadon on January 08, 2012, 01:04:02 PM
Liverpool have just offered £25 million plus Andy Carroll for Darren Bent. Villa have rejected it, saying they only want the money.

Source???

I think it may have been a joke at the expense of Andy Carroll.

Oh.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: KRS on January 08, 2012, 01:29:54 PM
Thats DEEP sarcasm from Legion! :D
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on January 08, 2012, 01:50:07 PM
You should have run with that for a bit Leeg. It's always a laugh watching some people get so wound up that end up sucking their thumb rocking back and forth in the corner of a dark room.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Steve R on January 08, 2012, 03:35:44 PM
Thats DEEP sarcasm from Legion! :D

It'll still be in tomorrow's Daily Mirror.

Gospel.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Salsa Party Animal on January 08, 2012, 04:22:47 PM
if we get this offer, I would take it for Bent.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: nodge on January 08, 2012, 05:06:52 PM
Somebody draw them a picture!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulTheVillan on January 08, 2012, 05:08:16 PM
Haha
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: D.boy on January 08, 2012, 05:27:32 PM
(http://thesinglefilez.files.wordpress.com/2010/05/bullshit.jpg)
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JUAN PABLO on January 08, 2012, 06:28:05 PM
Read somewhere we were looking at Bret Holman ( Australian striker )  . Never heard of him .
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: James on January 08, 2012, 06:47:04 PM
Read somewhere we were looking at Bret Holman ( Australian striker )  . Never heard of him .

On this thread?

I still can't decide ... Robbie Keane. Why?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Pete3206 on January 08, 2012, 06:51:35 PM
Quote
I still can't decide ... Robbie Keane. Why?

Because beggars can't be choosers. Heskey out for a month, with Fonz and Weinman looking like the only back up.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: hawkeye on January 08, 2012, 07:29:26 PM
Quote
I still can't decide ... Robbie Keane. Why?

Because beggars can't be choosers. Heskey out for a month, with Fonz and Weinman looking like the only back up.
Why Robbie Keane then?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Tom wintle on January 08, 2012, 08:32:23 PM
Quote
I still can't decide ... Robbie Keane. Why?

Because beggars can't be choosers. Heskey out for a month, with Fonz and Weinman looking like the only back up.
Why Robbie Keane then?
easy short term option that can score goals unlike hesky.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: villan1975 on January 08, 2012, 08:37:54 PM
Quote
I still can't decide ... Robbie Keane. Why?

Because beggars can't be choosers. Heskey out for a month, with Fonz and Weinman looking like the only back up.
Why Robbie Keane then?
easy short term option that can score goals unlike hesky.
If we are picking people on the basis that they can score more than Heskey
that is one hell of a long list.Keane is the absolute bottom rung journeyman out
there.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Matt Collins on January 08, 2012, 09:01:15 PM
It's quite hard to see that he'll go into the first team isn't it? Ireland is playing really well, but I don't see how you can play Ireland in his favoured position and Keane. No great harm done though, and he will offer more than heskey, weimann or fonz I'd imagine.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Ian. on January 08, 2012, 09:06:13 PM
I've always liked Keane. I was really surprised it never worked out at Liverpool. I wish we bought him at the time he went to Coventry. I just wonder if he will really be up for it, if he is he might just do well.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 08, 2012, 09:14:09 PM
It's quite hard to see that he'll go into the first team isn't it? Ireland is playing really well, but I don't see how you can play Ireland in his favoured position and Keane. No great harm done though, and he will offer more than heskey, weimann or fonz I'd imagine.

Bottom rung? A bloke that went for 35 million in 1 season less than 3 years ago? Bit harsh
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on January 08, 2012, 09:20:43 PM
Quote
I still can't decide ... Robbie Keane. Why?

Because beggars can't be choosers. Heskey out for a month, with Fonz and Weinman looking like the only back up.
Why Robbie Keane then?
easy short term option that can score goals unlike hesky.
If we are picking people on the basis that they can score more than Heskey
that is one hell of a long list.Keane is the absolute bottom rung journeyman out
there.

Are you posting for dramatic effect? If we were about to sign Bret Ormerod, Dean Bowditch or bring Guy Whittingham out of retirement I might agree with you. However we are talking about a 31 year old captain of his country going to the European Championships. A player who has proven himself a this level and up until 12 months ago was a starting player. He might not be what he once was but bottom rung is about as melodramatic as you could have been.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Steve kirk on January 08, 2012, 09:25:15 PM
I just wish someone would take Warnock off our hands. :)
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: villan1975 on January 08, 2012, 09:36:16 PM
Quote
I still can't decide ... Robbie Keane. Why?

Because beggars can't be choosers. Heskey out for a month, with Fonz and Weinman looking like the only back up.
Why Robbie Keane then?
easy short term option that can score goals unlike hesky.
If we are picking people on the basis that they can score more than Heskey
that is one hell of a long list.Keane is the absolute bottom rung journeyman out
there.

Are you posting for dramatic effect? If we were about to sign Bret Ormerod, Dean Bowditch or bring Guy Whittingham out of retirement I might agree with you. However we are talking about a 31 year old captain of his country going to the European Championships. A player who has proven himself a this level and up until 12 months ago was a starting player. He might not be what he once was but bottom rung is about as melodramatic as you could have been.
Why is he not playing professional football in this country?Why did he do so
poorly at West Ham?
Genuinely is a bizzare transfer and is up there with Pires.
Especially with our wage situation and when we have two young lads that are
at the crossroads of there careers.
Would rather save the wages and use our own youth system to see if they can make it.

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Ian. on January 08, 2012, 09:40:35 PM
There are plenty of players not playing in this country who are good enough. Why is a World class player like Torres struggling at Chelsea? Sometimes it just does not work out.
Worth a punt I reckon.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: hawkeye on January 08, 2012, 09:41:12 PM
I think peope are upset by the Robbie Keane deal is because it smacks of amuterism. We dont need a past it centre forward who failed at the PL level for 2 years before going for the soft  money option (where he has not exactly been pulling up trees except when he is counting) , but the people running the club probably believe that this deal will somehow apppease the fans. Lack of real investment and ambition = Robbie Keane on loan.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Walmley_Villa on January 08, 2012, 09:42:13 PM
Not sure but should start with a clean slate like any player (or manager for that matter). Hope he delivers.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 08, 2012, 09:46:09 PM
I think peope are upset by the Robbie Keane deal is because it smacks of amuterism. We dont need a past it centre forward who failed at the PL level for 2 years before going for the soft  money option (where he has not exactly been pulling up trees except when he is counting) , but the people running the club probably believe that this deal will somehow apppease the fans. Lack of real investment and ambition = Robbie Keane on loan.

For two months. Why anyone can get so worked up about it is beyond me.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 08, 2012, 09:46:14 PM
Spurs fans couldn't wait to see the back of him.

He was a laughable mess at West Ham.

He's playing in the MLS, which is a piss poor quality, for a reason.

It's nice to see Lerner back the manager, mind. So long as he has requests as modest as this, I think he'll get on fine with the chairman.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 08, 2012, 09:46:55 PM
He is not here to sit on the bench for the cost though is he?

So where is he going to play? Up with Bent and drop Ireland? Out left and drop Gabby? Just not sure where he fit, especially where we are struggling to get Gabby and Bent playing well in the same side.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: tarzansbrother on January 08, 2012, 09:52:45 PM
He is not here to sit on the bench for the cost though is he?

So where is he going to play? Up with Bent and drop Ireland? Out left and drop Gabby? Just not sure where he fit, especially where we are struggling to get Gabby and Bent playing well in the same side.

This is my fear. Otherwise we are paying big money for some kind of morale booster in the dressing room. No doubt he will be arranging a piss up in Ireland like he did at Spurs.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: hawkeye on January 08, 2012, 09:56:13 PM
I think peope are upset by the Robbie Keane deal is because it smacks of amuterism. We dont need a past it centre forward who failed at the PL level for 2 years before going for the soft  money option (where he has not exactly been pulling up trees except when he is counting) , but the people running the club probably believe that this deal will somehow apppease the fans. Lack of real investment and ambition = Robbie Keane on loan.

For two months. Why anyone can get so worked up about it is beyond me.
You said the same about Pires, its about the message the club are sending out "let them eat cake" its just papering over the cracks, we have the keystone cops playing at the back, if they really wanted or understood how to make the current team more competitive, they would address this problem, but no we get Robbie Keane on loan- Brilliant
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 08, 2012, 09:56:59 PM
I'm not worked out or overly bothered about the fact it is Robbie Keane.

It is what it says about our mid-long term ambitions that worries me.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 08, 2012, 10:00:15 PM
I think peope are upset by the Robbie Keane deal is because it smacks of amuterism. We dont need a past it centre forward who failed at the PL level for 2 years before going for the soft  money option (where he has not exactly been pulling up trees except when he is counting) , but the people running the club probably believe that this deal will somehow apppease the fans. Lack of real investment and ambition = Robbie Keane on loan.

For two months. Why anyone can get so worked up about it is beyond me.
You said the same about Pires, its about the message the club are sending out "let them eat cake" its just papering over the cracks, we have the keystone cops playing at the back, if they really wanted or understood how to make the current team more competitive, they would address this problem, but no we get Robbie Keane on loan- Brilliant

I said the same about Pires, although the situation was different. We were desperate for bodies at the time and he was just about the only one available. He came, he left. Nothing to get worked up about.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JUAN PABLO on January 08, 2012, 10:00:46 PM
I think peope are upset by the Robbie Keane deal is because it smacks of amuterism. We dont need a past it centre forward who failed at the PL level for 2 years before going for the soft  money option (where he has not exactly been pulling up trees except when he is counting) , but the people running the club probably believe that this deal will somehow apppease the fans. Lack of real investment and ambition = Robbie Keane on loan.

bit like Scholes really
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: hawkeye on January 08, 2012, 10:02:13 PM
I'm not worked out or overly bothered about the fact it is Robbie Keane.

It is what it says about our mid-long term ambitions that worries me.
Same here mate, it does not make any sense
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: hawkeye on January 08, 2012, 10:05:08 PM
I think peope are upset by the Robbie Keane deal is because it smacks of amuterism. We dont need a past it centre forward who failed at the PL level for 2 years before going for the soft  money option (where he has not exactly been pulling up trees except when he is counting) , but the people running the club probably believe that this deal will somehow apppease the fans. Lack of real investment and ambition = Robbie Keane on loan.

bit like Scholes really
not really, Scholes has continued to train at Carrington, he is an ex player who has signed for the rest of the season, no comparison
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Eigentor on January 08, 2012, 10:05:14 PM
If we're confident that we won't go down, and Big Eck's job is to introduce the youngsters to the first team, then there is little point in bringing in Robbie Keane; he's only impact would be to block the younger players from getting first team action.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 08, 2012, 10:09:02 PM
I agree with the last post. I would sooner see us play 1 up with Bannan and Gardner playing in behind to get them time on the pitch and experience.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: olaftab on January 08, 2012, 10:10:10 PM
Again no point in making any signings in Jan for 3 reasons:
1. You pay too much  for mediocre
2. Eck needs to get the best out of current crop so that we can trust  him to spend money wisely
3. Give our youth a chance
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: hawkeye on January 08, 2012, 10:10:44 PM
I think peope are upset by the Robbie Keane deal is because it smacks of amuterism. We dont need a past it centre forward who failed at the PL level for 2 years before going for the soft  money option (where he has not exactly been pulling up trees except when he is counting) , but the people running the club probably believe that this deal will somehow apppease the fans. Lack of real investment and ambition = Robbie Keane on loan.

For two months. Why anyone can get so worked up about it is beyond me.
You said the same about Pires, its about the message the club are sending out "let them eat cake" its just papering over the cracks, we have the keystone cops playing at the back, if they really wanted or understood how to make the current team more competitive, they would address this problem, but no we get Robbie Keane on loan- Brilliant

I said the same about Pires, although the situation was different. We were desperate for bodies at the time and he was just about the only one available. He came, he left. Nothing to get worked up about.
except as with Pires the Manager felt duty bound to play him, he came on against Wolves and lost us the game and was an embaressment when he did play.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 08, 2012, 10:13:06 PM
My problem with Keane is the cost. Assuming the figures talked about are correct, why, when we seem to have so little money are we spending on a player who will be here for 2 months? Put the money towards a longterm signing, even if it means not spending until the summer.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 08, 2012, 10:16:23 PM
I think peope are upset by the Robbie Keane deal is because it smacks of amuterism. We dont need a past it centre forward who failed at the PL level for 2 years before going for the soft  money option (where he has not exactly been pulling up trees except when he is counting) , but the people running the club probably believe that this deal will somehow apppease the fans. Lack of real investment and ambition = Robbie Keane on loan.

For two months. Why anyone can get so worked up about it is beyond me.
You said the same about Pires, its about the message the club are sending out "let them eat cake" its just papering over the cracks, we have the keystone cops playing at the back, if they really wanted or understood how to make the current team more competitive, they would address this problem, but no we get Robbie Keane on loan- Brilliant

I said the same about Pires, although the situation was different. We were desperate for bodies at the time and he was just about the only one available. He came, he left. Nothing to get worked up about.
except as with Pires the Manager felt duty bound to play him, he came on against Wolves and lost us the game and was an embaressment when he did play.

Of course he was. On for half an hour in a match we were already losing. I fail to see how that 'lost us the game'
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Risso on January 08, 2012, 10:17:03 PM
Again no point in making any signings in Jan for 3 reasons:
1. You pay too much  for mediocre
2. Eck needs to get the best out of current crop so that we can trust  him to spend money wisely
3. Give our youth a chance

We haven't really got any youth who can play left back though have we?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Risso on January 08, 2012, 10:18:25 PM
I think peope are upset by the Robbie Keane deal is because it smacks of amuterism. We dont need a past it centre forward who failed at the PL level for 2 years before going for the soft  money option (where he has not exactly been pulling up trees except when he is counting) , but the people running the club probably believe that this deal will somehow apppease the fans. Lack of real investment and ambition = Robbie Keane on loan.

For two months. Why anyone can get so worked up about it is beyond me.
You said the same about Pires, its about the message the club are sending out "let them eat cake" its just papering over the cracks, we have the keystone cops playing at the back, if they really wanted or understood how to make the current team more competitive, they would address this problem, but no we get Robbie Keane on loan- Brilliant

I said the same about Pires, although the situation was different. We were desperate for bodies at the time and he was just about the only one available. He came, he left. Nothing to get worked up about.
except as with Pires the Manager felt duty bound to play him, he came on against Wolves and lost us the game and was an embaressment when he did play.

Of course he was.

He absolutely was an embarrassment.  For 95% of the time he looked land played ike my granddad immediately after his hip operation.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 08, 2012, 10:18:48 PM
Left back is the one position we have to get. Anyone that is solid and can pass to a team mate. There has to be one or two out there, again even Championship full backs are better than ours.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JUAN PABLO on January 08, 2012, 10:19:16 PM
I think peope are upset by the Robbie Keane deal is because it smacks of amuterism. We dont need a past it centre forward who failed at the PL level for 2 years before going for the soft  money option (where he has not exactly been pulling up trees except when he is counting) , but the people running the club probably believe that this deal will somehow apppease the fans. Lack of real investment and ambition = Robbie Keane on loan.

bit like Scholes really
not really, Scholes has continued to train at Carrington, he is an ex player who has signed for the rest of the season, no comparison

yes but we are Villa
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 08, 2012, 10:25:47 PM
Maybe we could set up a scouting thread, one that brings forward players we have not heard of but could keep an eye out for from our various posters around the country. Do we have one already? Anyway... if someone could start with a left back that would be dandy.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: old man villa fan on January 08, 2012, 10:27:13 PM
I think peope are upset by the Robbie Keane deal is because it smacks of amuterism. We dont need a past it centre forward who failed at the PL level for 2 years before going for the soft  money option (where he has not exactly been pulling up trees except when he is counting) , but the people running the club probably believe that this deal will somehow apppease the fans. Lack of real investment and ambition = Robbie Keane on loan.

For two months. Why anyone can get so worked up about it is beyond me.
You said the same about Pires, its about the message the club are sending out "let them eat cake" its just papering over the cracks, we have the keystone cops playing at the back, if they really wanted or understood how to make the current team more competitive, they would address this problem, but no we get Robbie Keane on loan- Brilliant

I said the same about Pires, although the situation was different. We were desperate for bodies at the time and he was just about the only one available. He came, he left. Nothing to get worked up about.
except as with Pires the Manager felt duty bound to play him, he came on against Wolves and lost us the game and was an embaressment when he did play.

I seemed to remember him being man of the match in one game and going off to a standing ovation.  Not saying much about other appearances though.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 08, 2012, 10:29:06 PM
Blackburn home. He was fecking brilliant. And in fairness, for me, worth signing for that afternoon.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Ian. on January 08, 2012, 10:33:43 PM
Maybe we could set up a scouting thread, one that brings forward players we have not heard of but could keep an eye out for from our various posters around the country. Do we have one already? Anyway... if someone could start with a left back that would be dandy.
Luke Young played well at left back for us. Better than Warnock anyway. But yeah we need one and I have not a clue who's out there and I'm hoping we are looking.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: villan1975 on January 08, 2012, 10:34:50 PM
Left back is the one position we have to get. Anyone that is solid and can pass to a team mate. There has to be one or two out there, again even Championship full backs are better than ours.
My mate Steve is left footed.Not overly inspiring I know but it is a start.
He a bit on the heavy side and short sighted but he really cannot do a lot worse
than our current left back.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 08, 2012, 10:36:35 PM
Pires was embarassing bar that Blackburn cup game. Mark Fletcher got it right in one match thread when he said "it looked like a fan had run on the pitch".

However, Houllier signed Pires when we were suffering one of the worst injury crises we've ever suffered, and could only sign unattached players. I entirely understand why he took a gamble. It's not as if he had many options. We desperately needed bodies.

Keane is being signed during a transfer window, after several months of being told we can't buy until we sell, and we can't add to the wage bill.

General Krulak said of McLeish (just before he disappeared from view) "imagine what he could do with a chairman who backed him".

No wonder he did a bunk, I'd like to see how he'd justify this as "backing" the manager.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: saunders_heroes on January 08, 2012, 10:39:37 PM
Comparing Keane to Pires is a bit unfair. Keane's 31. Pires was about 37 when he joined us.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: olaftab on January 08, 2012, 10:39:44 PM
Again no point in making any signings in Jan for 3 reasons:
1. You pay too much  for mediocre
2. Eck needs to get the best out of current crop so that we can trust  him to spend money wisely
3. Give our youth a chance

We haven't really got any youth who can play left back though have we?

Where is Nathan Baker?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: saunders_heroes on January 08, 2012, 10:45:42 PM
Again no point in making any signings in Jan for 3 reasons:
1. You pay too much  for mediocre
2. Eck needs to get the best out of current crop so that we can trust  him to spend money wisely
3. Give our youth a chance

We haven't really got any youth who can play left back though have we?

We've been giving our youth a chance for years now. They're just not good enough.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 08, 2012, 10:46:32 PM
Pires was probably the best player available to us, or indeed anyone, who needed to get a body in at that moment in time.

Keane isn't.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Matt C on January 08, 2012, 10:46:42 PM
At Millwall.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: saunders_heroes on January 08, 2012, 10:52:52 PM
Pires was probably the best player available to us, or indeed anyone, who needed to get a body in at that moment in time.

Keane isn't.

It's pretty obvious we haven't got any money to spend in January, so Keane is probably our best bet. Not much difference to the Pires signing really.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 08, 2012, 10:54:35 PM
Pires was probably the best player available to us, or indeed anyone, who needed to get a body in at that moment in time.

Keane isn't.

It's pretty obvious we haven't got any money to spend in January, so Keane is probably our best bet. Not much difference to the Pires signing really.

As we don't have an injury crisis why not just save the money and put it towards a long term signing?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: saunders_heroes on January 08, 2012, 11:07:09 PM
Pires was probably the best player available to us, or indeed anyone, who needed to get a body in at that moment in time.

Keane isn't.

It's pretty obvious we haven't got any money to spend in January, so Keane is probably our best bet. Not much difference to the Pires signing really.

As we don't have an injury crisis why not just save the money and put it towards a long term signing?

What's wrong with taking a player on for a couple of months who is only going to cost us 8 weeks wages? He could score us the goals to save us from a relegation battle. He's a better bet than Heskey on the bench, that's for sure.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 08, 2012, 11:10:34 PM
Pires was probably the best player available to us, or indeed anyone, who needed to get a body in at that moment in time.

Keane isn't.

It's pretty obvious we haven't got any money to spend in January, so Keane is probably our best bet. Not much difference to the Pires signing really.

As we don't have an injury crisis why not just save the money and put it towards a long term signing?

What's wrong with taking a player on for a couple of months who is only going to cost us 8 weeks wages? He could score us the goals to save us from a relegation battle. He's a better bet than Heskey on the bench, that's for sure.

The fact we don't have any money and it's rumoured it could cost us around £750K including loan fee for a player to be here for 2 months?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: hawkeye on January 08, 2012, 11:13:36 PM
Pires was probably the best player available to us, or indeed anyone, who needed to get a body in at that moment in time.

Keane isn't.

It's pretty obvious we haven't got any money to spend in January, so Keane is probably our best bet. Not much difference to the Pires signing really.

As we don't have an injury crisis why not just save the money and put it towards a long term signing?

What's wrong with taking a player on for a couple of months who is only going to cost us 8 weeks wages? He could score us the goals to save us from a relegation battle. He's a better bet than Heskey on the bench, that's for sure.
Actually I am not sure, not even sure he is better than Fonz or Weimen
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JUAN PABLO on January 08, 2012, 11:14:13 PM
west ham bid 4 million for Rhodes .   

what were Ipswich thinking ?    another good player at Ipswich is Josh Carson ( defender ) .
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TheSandman on January 08, 2012, 11:14:20 PM
Pires was probably the best player available to us, or indeed anyone, who needed to get a body in at that moment in time.

Keane isn't.

It's pretty obvious we haven't got any money to spend in January, so Keane is probably our best bet. Not much difference to the Pires signing really.

As we don't have an injury crisis why not just save the money and put it towards a long term signing?

What's wrong with taking a player on for a couple of months who is only going to cost us 8 weeks wages? He could score us the goals to save us from a relegation battle. He's a better bet than Heskey on the bench, that's for sure.

The fact that he is utterly crap now and is playing in MLS for a reason?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: saunders_heroes on January 08, 2012, 11:15:13 PM
Pires was probably the best player available to us, or indeed anyone, who needed to get a body in at that moment in time.

Keane isn't.

It's pretty obvious we haven't got any money to spend in January, so Keane is probably our best bet. Not much difference to the Pires signing really.

As we don't have an injury crisis why not just save the money and put it towards a long term signing?

What's wrong with taking a player on for a couple of months who is only going to cost us 8 weeks wages? He could score us the goals to save us from a relegation battle. He's a better bet than Heskey on the bench, that's for sure.

The fact we don't have any money and it's rumoured it could cost us around £750K including loan fee for a player to be here for 2 months?

But that £750k could help us to a top half finish. Something that looks a million miles away at the moment. Anyway, if we could afford it we wouldn't pay it.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 08, 2012, 11:16:14 PM
Personally I'd prefer us to find out if either Fonz or Weimann might be good enough rather thank spunk money on a player like Keane.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: saunders_heroes on January 08, 2012, 11:16:57 PM
Pires was probably the best player available to us, or indeed anyone, who needed to get a body in at that moment in time.

Keane isn't.

It's pretty obvious we haven't got any money to spend in January, so Keane is probably our best bet. Not much difference to the Pires signing really.

As we don't have an injury crisis why not just save the money and put it towards a long term signing?

What's wrong with taking a player on for a couple of months who is only going to cost us 8 weeks wages? He could score us the goals to save us from a relegation battle. He's a better bet than Heskey on the bench, that's for sure.

The fact that he is utterly crap now and is playing in MLS for a reason?

There are some good players in America. Donovan is pretty decent. And remember, Keane is 31, not 37 (like Pires).
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: saunders_heroes on January 08, 2012, 11:17:30 PM
Personally I'd prefer us to find out if either Fonz or Weimann might be good enough rather thank spunk money on a player like Keane.

Rely on the kids and it'll end in tears.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JUAN PABLO on January 08, 2012, 11:18:03 PM
Pires was probably the best player available to us, or indeed anyone, who needed to get a body in at that moment in time.

Keane isn't.

Merson was a pundit on the sky panel at the time
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 08, 2012, 11:21:22 PM
Personally I'd prefer us to find out if either Fonz or Weimann might be good enough rather thank spunk money on a player like Keane.

Rely on the kids and it'll end in tears.

You are Robbie Keane's agent and I claim my £5.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 08, 2012, 11:22:58 PM
Demba Ba has a £7m release clause, says Harry.

http://tinyurl.com/7q3wdqp

Quote
Harry Redknapp has sparked a massive transfer scramble for Newcastle’s Demba Ba by revealing his release clause is around HALF the £10million mooted over the weekend.

Officials at St James’ Park have been desperate to keep a lid on the fact that the striker, who has netted 15 times this season, is available for the right fee.

But asked about a £10m release clause, Spurs boss Harry Redknapp said: “I think you will find it is a lot less than that.”

Asked if was as little as £7m, Redknapp added: “Even less than that.”

A whole host of clubs are set to investigate poaching the predator who destroyed Manchester United last week with an outstanding display.

Liverpool, Sunderland, Everton and QPR are all in the hunt for reinforcements up front. Ba left West Ham last summer as he had a clause in his contract saying he could quit if they were relegated.

Ba has blown away fears over a knee injury that prompted Stoke to pull out of a move for him last year.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 08, 2012, 11:26:48 PM
Even less thank £7million according to 'Onest 'Arry. I'm curious how he would know what the contract details are of a player at another club. Surely he hasn't been tapping anyone up.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on January 08, 2012, 11:27:40 PM
Demba Ba has a £7m release clause, says Harry.

http://tinyurl.com/7q3wdqp

Quote
Harry Redknapp has sparked a massive transfer scramble for Newcastle’s Demba Ba by revealing his release clause is around HALF the £10million mooted over the weekend.

Officials at St James’ Park have been desperate to keep a lid on the fact that the striker, who has netted 15 times this season, is available for the right fee.

But asked about a £10m release clause, Spurs boss Harry Redknapp said: “I think you will find it is a lot less than that.”

Asked if was as little as £7m, Redknapp added: “Even less than that.”

A whole host of clubs are set to investigate poaching the predator who destroyed Manchester United last week with an outstanding display.

Liverpool, Sunderland, Everton and QPR are all in the hunt for reinforcements up front. Ba left West Ham last summer as he had a clause in his contract saying he could quit if they were relegated.

Ba has blown away fears over a knee injury that prompted Stoke to pull out of a move for him last year.

Actually less according to Mr Motorgob. As much as I hated O'Leary how he got got done for talking about Beattie and Redknapp never has about numerous players under contract is beyond me.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Matt C on January 08, 2012, 11:28:49 PM
How does he get away with it?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dave on January 08, 2012, 11:31:07 PM
At no point has Redknapp ever admitted to talking to the player without their clubs permission like O'Leary did with Beattie.

Until he does, there is very little that he can be charged with. In footballing terms, anyroad.

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: KevinGage on January 08, 2012, 11:31:44 PM
He's the complete opposite of any other Johhny Tightlips manager who gives next to nothing away when they're asked about transfers.

Thats why SSN and the like positively swoon over him.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 08, 2012, 11:34:28 PM
Be nice if a reporter actually did their job and asked him how he knows how much a Newcastle United players release clause is.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: timeoutbigbar on January 08, 2012, 11:37:12 PM
Personally I'd prefer us to find out if either Fonz or Weimann might be good enough rather thank spunk money on a player like Keane.

Rely on the kids and it'll end in tears.

I agree entirely considering what we've seen at senior level from Fonz and Weimann.  A couple of anonymous appearances in games we need results from could cost us dearly, aswell as dent their confidence.  Robbie Keane, regardless of his age, has quality and has the experience of top level football, and is far more likely to be of use than the kids.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 08, 2012, 11:40:08 PM
Weimann has played about 20 mins in the league for us this season. Shouldn't we actually give him a chance?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: timeoutbigbar on January 08, 2012, 11:42:39 PM
Weimann has played about 20 mins in the league for us this season. Shouldn't we actually give him a chance?

In my opinion Weimann should go back out on loan for the season, and I have very little confidence in Fonz making the grade.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: saunders_heroes on January 08, 2012, 11:55:54 PM
I'd be terrified to into the rest of the season relying on Fonz and Weimann.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Risso on January 08, 2012, 11:56:56 PM
Even less thank £7million according to 'Onest 'Arry. I'm curious how he would know what the contract details are of a player at another club. Surely he hasn't been tapping anyone up.

To be fair, I'd imagine his agent has been on the phone to every manager in the world trying to get him a move.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: saunders_heroes on January 09, 2012, 12:02:40 AM
Collins linked with Tottenham according to one of tomorrow's papers. £3m.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 09, 2012, 12:05:46 AM
I'd be glad to see the back of Collins to absolutely anywhere, but moving him on to Spurs and thinking of the integration of the witless hoof into Spurs fabled Barcelona-esque passing game is extra tantalising.

Can we give Harry a discount? Say 100 percent?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: saunders_heroes on January 09, 2012, 12:11:58 AM
If there's one thing I'm sick to death with at Villa this season it's seeing James Collins hoof the ball up the pitch into oblivion. Good riddance.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 09, 2012, 12:12:52 AM
I would straight swap him for Dos Santos, who always looks brilliant to me.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: timeoutbigbar on January 09, 2012, 12:13:01 AM
I'd be glad to see the back of Collins to absolutely anywhere, but moving him on to Spurs and thinking of the integration of the witless hoof into Spurs fabled Barcelona-esque passing game is extra tantalising.

Can we give Harry a discount? Say 100 percent?

Well I suppose Spurs will have money to spend when Bale goes to Barca for £60 million....
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: timeoutbigbar on January 09, 2012, 12:13:42 AM
I would straight swap him for Dos Santos, who always looks brilliant to me.

Good shout, although he isn't a 'McLeish type' player.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Summers on January 09, 2012, 12:20:16 AM
Newcastle fans must hate Redknapp. He just told the world they can get the most in-form striker around for 5m.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: eamonn on January 09, 2012, 12:57:06 AM

But that £750k could help us to a top half finish. Something that looks a million miles away at the moment.


Er, we're a point off 10th place and two points off 9th.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Clampy on January 09, 2012, 08:09:36 AM
Be nice if a reporter actually did their job and asked him how he knows how much a Newcastle United players release clause is.

I don't think a reporter would want to do that being as Arry is a very good source for information.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: richard moore on January 09, 2012, 08:32:20 AM
I would straight swap him for Dos Santos, who always looks brilliant to me.

Good shout, although he isn't a 'McLeish type' player.

Nor I suspect someone who is perhaps going to give of his best in the outback that he might perceive Birmingham to be?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Simon Ward on January 09, 2012, 09:23:04 AM
Why are we not sniffing around Jordan Rhodes from Huddersfield. The kid will be a big star and certainly worth getting in before he sits on the bench for Spurs reserves!
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/16460878.stm
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TimTheVillain on January 09, 2012, 09:23:08 AM
Personally I'd prefer us to find out if either Fonz or Weimann might be good enough rather thank spunk money on a player like Keane.

Rely on the kids and it'll end in tears.

I think Keane can work with Bent but at the expense of who , Gabby ?

The problem at the moment is how to accommodate a top goalscorer who signed to play for us with service coming from the Wuss and Ash - both of whom ended up at other clubs come the start of this season and their transfer fees not reinvested in players.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Chris Smith on January 09, 2012, 09:23:56 AM
The more I've thought about it the more sense the Keane move makes. His strength has always been his movement something we need to improve on. We're now getting far more crosses into the box but it's noticeable that we rarely get a man at the front post, I'm sure Marc and Charles will appreciate having him in there.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: mrfuse on January 09, 2012, 09:33:44 AM
If there's one thing I'm sick to death with at Villa this season it's seeing James Collins hoof the ball up the pitch into oblivion. Good riddance.

Yep im fed up of shouting Dont Ho......to late, I could be wrong but I dont remember him being as bad under MON. Be happy to see him go
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 09, 2012, 10:35:48 AM
First season he seemed to play some good long ish passes, but at the moment he just aimlessly hoofs the ball. In the past we have had Ugo who was limited, but had an out ball into the channel that he always played, and our forwards would chase down.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 09, 2012, 10:47:46 AM
If there's one thing I'm sick to death with at Villa this season it's seeing James Collins hoof the ball up the pitch into oblivion. Good riddance.

Yep im fed up of shouting Dont Ho......to late, I could be wrong but I dont remember him being as bad under MON. Be happy to see him go

I think we can all understand why GH fell out with both Dunne and Collins.  He likes technical defenders who can confident with bringing the ball out and making passes to a team mates feet, clearly something mainly Collins and to a certain extent Dunne, is incapable of doing.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JUAN PABLO on January 09, 2012, 10:50:25 AM
I cant believe the manager knows his players inside out and doesn't say to Collins no hoofing . Maybe thats why he wants rid , he does not listen.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: saunders_heroes on January 09, 2012, 11:07:48 AM

But that £750k could help us to a top half finish. Something that looks a million miles away at the moment.


Er, we're a point off 10th place and two points off 9th.

True, but we've struggled to stay top half all season so far. I can't see it changing much 2nd half. Can you?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: VillaAlways on January 09, 2012, 11:38:26 AM
Robbie Keane training with the Villa today and deal should be complete in 24 hrs according to SSN Welcome Robbie, Hope you do the biz for the short time you're with us
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 09, 2012, 11:43:04 AM
Colins to Spurs? Could this be true?  I pretty much doubt it though:

http://tinyurl.com/8yw2tgc
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: eastie on January 09, 2012, 11:44:12 AM
Many years later than hoped but I'm delighted robbie keane will be a villa player- he is a quality player and will add both experience and class to our squad- just a shame it's only short term.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 09, 2012, 11:47:02 AM
I cant believe the manager knows his players inside out and doesn't say to Collins no hoofing . Maybe thats why he wants rid , he does not listen.

I think, and I know other will disagree, that Collins remains quite sound defensively, hence he keeps his place.  It'll be interesting to see, presuming he doesn't get sold, what happens once Herd is back as Clark could then play CB.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Matt C on January 09, 2012, 11:50:03 AM
Robbie Keane training with us according to SSN.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 09, 2012, 11:56:54 AM
Robbie Keane training with us according to SSN.

I wasn't too keen at this deal initially but its starting to make sense.  Gabby and Bent are our only 2 experienced centre forwards (Heskey being injured for the next month or so).  Fonz and Weimann are not ready yet ( I dont think Fonz will ever be if im honest) so with Robbie coming in for the short term is a good idea now.  I wish him all the best in a villa shirt and I really hope he can bag a few important goals for us and help Bent rediscover his form.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: villasjf on January 09, 2012, 11:58:52 AM
Why are we not sniffing around Jordan Rhodes from Huddersfield. The kid will be a big star and certainly worth getting in before he sits on the bench for Spurs reserves!
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/16460878.stm
I hope we are looking at him he is young, strong and scores goals for fun 27 so far this season and 5 away from home last friday
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 09, 2012, 11:59:26 AM
Best thing about Keane is he's a different type of striker from Gabby or Bent.  So if either of those two aren't working, it gives us a genuine option from the bench to change a game.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 09, 2012, 12:01:22 PM
He seems pretty good. If you are going to buy him, now is the time.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: olaftab on January 09, 2012, 12:11:51 PM
Newcastle fans must hate Redknapp. He just told the world they can get the most in-form striker around for 5m.

I think his agent may have done that already.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: olaftab on January 09, 2012, 12:13:21 PM
Robbie Keane training with us according to SSN.

No we are doooomed.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dave on January 09, 2012, 12:38:50 PM

But that £750k could help us to a top half finish. Something that looks a million miles away at the moment.


Er, we're a point off 10th place and two points off 9th.

True, but we've struggled to stay top half all season so far. I can't see it changing much 2nd half. Can you?
We've spent about three weeks out of the top ten since August.

So yeah, "a million miles" away.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Irish villain on January 09, 2012, 12:42:36 PM
Robbie Keane training with the Villa today and deal should be complete in 24 hrs according to SSN Welcome Robbie, Hope you do the biz for the short time you're with us

This. I think it's a good deal for everybody concerned. He will provide competition and might even benefit some of the younger ones.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dave on January 09, 2012, 12:45:31 PM
The more I've thought about it the more sense the Keane move makes. His strength has always been his movement something we need to improve on. We're now getting far more crosses into the box but it's noticeable that we rarely get a man at the front post, I'm sure Marc and Charles will appreciate having him in there.
Are we dropping Bent, Gabby or Ireland to make space for him in the above scenario?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Summers on January 09, 2012, 12:45:49 PM
I'd ask 'em for Corluka or Bassong for Collins.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 09, 2012, 12:52:41 PM
According to Mat Kendrick's live web chat on the bham mail website, due to a technicality, Keane's move doesnt count as a loan (dont ask me why) and therefore villa can loan one more player this transfer window. 
Dont shoot the messenger.  Im just repeating what he said.....
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JUAN PABLO on January 09, 2012, 01:07:42 PM
Robbie Keane training with the Villa today and deal should be complete in 24 hrs according to SSN Welcome Robbie, Hope you do the biz for the short time you're with us

well I hope he doesnt start with Bent . They have never scored together in a match
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 09, 2012, 01:12:50 PM
The more I've thought about it the more sense the Keane move makes. His strength has always been his movement something we need to improve on. We're now getting far more crosses into the box but it's noticeable that we rarely get a man at the front post, I'm sure Marc and Charles will appreciate having him in there.
Are we dropping Bent, Gabby or Ireland to make space for him in the above scenario?

For me it's niether, as I see Keane starting on the bench and coming on as needed.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JUAN PABLO on January 09, 2012, 01:13:59 PM
Id offer Defonz and 2.5 million for Rhodes
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on January 09, 2012, 01:17:34 PM
I'm not ready to give up on Fonz yet. Or Weimann for that matter.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: VillaAlways on January 09, 2012, 01:22:09 PM
I'm not ready to give up on Fonz yet. Or Weimann for that matter.
I'm hoping the plan is we have Keane for a couple of months,get relatively safe and then can introduce the Fonz and Weimann again
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JUAN PABLO on January 09, 2012, 01:23:01 PM
I'm not ready to give up on Fonz yet. Or Weimann for that matter.

Bent Gabby Rhodes Weimann would be fine by me
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: James on January 09, 2012, 01:28:59 PM
I'm not ready to give up on Fonz yet. Or Weimann for that matter.
I'm hoping the plan is we have Keane for a couple of months,get relatively safe and then can introduce the Fonz and Weimann again

I'm just hoping that there's a plan! If there is it's a bloody mysterious one!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on January 09, 2012, 01:34:47 PM
The more I've thought about it the more sense the Keane move makes. His strength has always been his movement something we need to improve on. We're now getting far more crosses into the box but it's noticeable that we rarely get a man at the front post, I'm sure Marc and Charles will appreciate having him in there.
Are we dropping Bent, Gabby or Ireland to make space for him in the above scenario?

For me it's niether, as I see Keane starting on the bench and coming on as needed.

me too. He might start the odd game, but I expect him to be an 20-25 minute impact type player that adds more energy, skill, guile and possibility of scoring than Heskey or Fonz. For a couple of months he's an option to have available. The club might be in conservative mode, but clearly this makes sense to them otherwise they wouldn't be doing it. We're not in a position to splash 5m on a player, so this for a couple of months looks a decent option.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 09, 2012, 01:35:23 PM
The Fonz is a difficult one as his scoring record for the first team is pretty decent, yet he still seems unable to hold a regular place - is it due to something in training we're not seeing?  He had a loan spell in the Championship last season (can't remember who to?) and was stuck out on the wing a lot, which won't help him.

Presuming Gabby and Bent both stay, it's hard to see him getting a regular game anyway, so it might one of those where it's better for him to move on.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on January 09, 2012, 01:42:31 PM
And then he'll be gone and if he develops into the player we thought he could be we'll look daft again. (Sturridge?)
I'm all for giving him a loan somehwere he'll be played up front but loathe to sell him yet.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 09, 2012, 01:44:32 PM
He has the talent Maz I agree, and I think he could do well in the wide roles behind Bent or Gabby. Although 6 months at Wigan or Bolton playing up front might do him a lot of good.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Merv on January 09, 2012, 01:46:18 PM
I just think it's so hard to make a judgement on Fonz while he's barely playing. The one sniff of a chance he's had in recent games, and he nearly nicked the winner at Stoke with what I thought was a decent effort, getting ahead of the defender to reach Gabby's cross.

Problem is, with us fielding a single striker on so many occasions this season, it's all the more tougher for Delfouneso and Weimann to get a chance. I'd have thought a month's loan spell for one of them is affordable while Keane is at the club.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 09, 2012, 01:47:05 PM
Yeah - a loan to a PL club would be best for him!

As for looking daft, it's never something that concerns me as our youth record is pretty good when it comes to who to let go and who to keep.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dante Lavelli on January 09, 2012, 04:03:04 PM
I'm not a fan of the Keane loan.  500k to 750k sounds a helluvalot of money for two months, especially as at best his role should be as an impact sub.  However, it does give us the opportunity to loan The Fonz and maybe even Weinmann for the same period.

They both need guaranteed games, so they can build up their stamina and get some goals.  Once Keane has gone back to LA hopefully The Fonz (or Weinmann) will be ready to play that impact sub role.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: maidstonevillain on January 09, 2012, 04:28:46 PM
I'm not ready to give up on Fonz yet. Or Weimann for that matter.

Agree re. Weimann. But Delfouneso has had enough chances. If he was going to make it, he would have done so by now. If he achieves as much as Luke Moore, he will have done well.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JJ-AV on January 09, 2012, 04:34:15 PM
Think Keane will do OK, but still seems a pointless signing - as we've already got 3 established forwards.

However, glad that our manager has got his first choice.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: luke25 on January 09, 2012, 04:35:06 PM
Can't we just morph Gabby and the Fonz together?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TheSandman on January 09, 2012, 06:34:09 PM
I'd rather morph Gabby and Bent together.

What a fucking player that would make!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SoccerHQ on January 09, 2012, 06:38:19 PM
He has the talent Maz I agree, and I think he could do well in the wide roles behind Bent or Gabby. Although 6 months at Wigan or Bolton playing up front might do him a lot of good.

Yeah I'd go with that. He really needs to play week in week out which won't happen here so loaning him out is the best bet. Think he's better dropping deep as he does that for the under 21s quite well. I've always liked to have seen how him and Gabby would combine.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on January 09, 2012, 07:29:35 PM
I'm not ready to give up on Fonz yet. Or Weimann for that matter.

Agree re. Weimann. But Delfouneso has had enough chances. If he was going to make it, he would have done so by now. If he achieves as much as Luke Moore, he will have done well.

Completely disagree. He hasn't had enough chances and only in these days of mass information do we write off 20 year old England U21 strikers who have had sporadic first team appearances. 10 years ago, many fans would have scarcely heard of them, never mind already given up on them.

Fonz might not make it but he hasn't had enough exposure to first team football yet to prove it by my reckoning.
And when he does get a chance it's like the clock is ticking and he has to do something special in the 10 or 20 minutes he might have to prove himself or be looked over for another month or so.

I regret that Heskey, a striker with hardly any goal scoring ability has had the gametime that Fonz, a striker who potentially has a lot of goal scoring ability should have had to really show is if he can or can not cope.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Villanation on January 09, 2012, 07:35:29 PM
I'm not ready to give up on Fonz yet. Or Weimann for that matter.

Agree re. Weimann. But Delfouneso has had enough chances. If he was going to make it, he would have done so by now. If he achieves as much as Luke Moore, he will have done well.

Completely disagree. He hasn't had enough chances and only in these days of mass information do we write off 20 year old England U21 strikers who have had sporadic first team appearances. 10 years ago, many fans would have scarcely heard of them, never mind already given up on them.

Fonz might not make it but he hasn't had enough exposure to first team football yet to prove it by my reckoning.
And when he does get a chance it's like the clock is ticking and he has to do something special in the 10 or 20 minutes he might have to prove himself or be looked over for another month or so.

I regret that Heskey, a striker with hardly any goal scoring ability has had the gametime that Fonz, a striker who potentially has a lot of goal scoring ability should have had to really show is if he can or can not cope.

I think he needs 5 or 6 starts on the trot, if we gave DB a rest, now maybe a good time, then we will see what he has.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: paul_e on January 09, 2012, 07:52:28 PM
I really is shocking how many people are willing to write the fonz off.

He's 20 (turns 21 next month) so is still younger than many players come through at.

A quick scan shows 20 starts and 38 subs appearances with a return of 10 goals.  Given most of those subs appearances have been 10-15mins at most his record is good enough to deserve a chance to have a run of games, half hour from the bench or the odd start.  Until he's had 7-8games of 30mins+ in the team can we judge him.

I'd have thought people would've learned after all the writing off of Guzan over the last 18months.

As for Keane I don't see the value to it if, as reported, we're having to pay 750k.  I just don't see him having enough impact to justify that.  He was a great player a few years back but he's lost half a yard of pace and hasn't been able to adapt his game to make up for it.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: garyshawsknee on January 09, 2012, 07:56:39 PM
I'm not ready to give up on Fonz yet. Or Weimann for that matter.

Agree re. Weimann. But Delfouneso has had enough chances. If he was going to make it, he would have done so by now. If he achieves as much as Luke Moore, he will have done well.

Completely disagree. He hasn't had enough chances and only in these days of mass information do we write off 20 year old England U21 strikers who have had sporadic first team appearances. 10 years ago, many fans would have scarcely heard of them, never mind already given up on them.

Fonz might not make it but he hasn't had enough exposure to first team football yet to prove it by my reckoning.
And when he does get a chance it's like the clock is ticking and he has to do something special in the 10 or 20 minutes he might have to prove himself or be looked over for another month or so.

I regret that Heskey, a striker with hardly any goal scoring ability has had the gametime that Fonz, a striker who potentially has a lot of goal scoring ability should have had to really show is if he can or can not cope.

I think he needs 5 or 6 starts on the trot, if we gave DB a rest, now maybe a good time, then we will see what he has.

All Emile does now when he plays is picks up knocks,Fonz or Weimann should be the first pick off the bench,i really hope its the last we see of Emile in a Villa shirt,as I don't think he'd get near most of Premier teams starting line up.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: supertom on January 09, 2012, 08:20:00 PM
In our system, where does Keane play? McLeish doesn't seem to know his best system by any stretch. He's flitting between a 4-4-2 and a 4-3-3 and slight variants. For me Keane would play as a second striker, just off Benty. So we'd be best playing a 4-4-1-1 to fit him in. But that would mean dropping Ireland just as he's coming good.

Or, we play Keane in place of Bent.

Or Keane wide left, where he's played before, but not as effectively as he can. But that means dropping either Gabby or Bent, or possibly dropping two of Zog, Alby and Ireland.

Do we bring him in as a bench option? That's no good for him, not that good for us. Again, as mentioned, we have Wiemann and Fonz who need the chance to prove themselves.
 
Saying that, we don't have a front man who can link midfield and attack. Keane can do that. In truth though, I'm not a fan of these two month loan deals. What if he comes in and sets the world a light, then we have to re-adjust our system again once he's gone?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: eamonn on January 09, 2012, 09:50:09 PM
I'd be happy if we got rid of Emile this month and forego any transfer fee (he's out of contract in the summer anyway). With Keane til March and then Fonz and Weimann covering the two main men, and Ireland starting to look like the quality ''in the hole'' player he used to be, we should be sorted.

And I'm pro-Fonz. Mazrim summed it up well, every time the kid gets a brief start or sub appearance he seems to be judged harsher than any other players. We're not a side that create bundles of chances as Bent will testify and the only sitters I remember Delfouenso missing were on his full debut at Fulham last season. He made up for that with a goal against Blackpool a few nights later which I believe was his last start until the Liverpool game before Christmas.

About exactly a year ago when we drew 1-1 at the Sty he nearly won the game with a fantastic bit of skill. He turned on a sixpence and struck an audacious strike from 30 yards out or more which crashed against the bar with Foster well-beaten. Most of you have probably forgotten it. Can't help thinking that had that gone in his Villa career would have blossomed. It still can in my opinion but unfortunately I don't think there's many left that believe in him. He has to perform extra-special to keep out Gabby and Bent but he must get pissed off when Bent contributes little (i.e in games he doesn't score).
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Matt C on January 09, 2012, 10:40:10 PM
As old Emile is now injured (again) for 'three to four weeks' according to McLeish then I'd say any slim chances of him leaving in January are gone. He'll be here until the summer when he'll move on to the last move of his career, presumably.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Jimmy Smash on January 09, 2012, 10:57:40 PM
Hell hang around til he contract runs out. No one is going to pay him any near as much as he gets at Villa.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: CJ on January 09, 2012, 11:27:27 PM
I wouldn't be remotely surprised if AM gives him an extended contract. Horrifying thought.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Fernando Partridge on January 09, 2012, 11:41:24 PM
Let us re sign Juan Pablo Angel!!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Bad English on January 10, 2012, 12:09:23 AM
Let us re sign Juan Pablo Angel!!
Just read that he was booted out of his last club to make way for Robbie Keane.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Summers on January 10, 2012, 12:34:11 AM
He was traded to Chivas. He scored 7 goals in 9 appearances for 'em. He only scored 3 in 22 for Galaxy.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Fernando Partridge on January 10, 2012, 12:38:13 AM
He was awesome @ the NewYorkRedBulls!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TaxDodger on January 10, 2012, 12:50:58 AM
Let us re sign Juan Pablo Angel!!

I'd seriously love it. Don't care if he's shite.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Somniloquism on January 10, 2012, 01:25:04 AM
Might get us first dibs on his youngest son.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rigadon on January 10, 2012, 07:10:33 AM
From BBC page: Former Aston Villa and Bolton defender Jlloyd Samuel has found a new club - in Iran.

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: bob on January 10, 2012, 07:34:40 AM
About exactly a year ago when we drew 1-1 at the Sty he nearly won the game with a fantastic bit of skill. He turned on a sixpence and struck an audacious strike from 30 yards out or more which crashed against the bar with Foster well-beaten. Most of you have probably forgotten it. Can't help thinking that had that gone in his Villa career would have blossomed.

I remember this and think exactly the same.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Malandro on January 10, 2012, 07:47:25 AM
maybe hughes will be willing to take Ireland and his pink car?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on January 10, 2012, 07:51:41 AM
heard a nasty rumour yesterday that Citeh could be after gabby if they get rid of Tevez. Nothing more than gossip though.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulTheVillan on January 10, 2012, 08:36:49 AM
heard a nasty rumour yesterday that Citeh could be after gabby if they get rid of Tevez. Nothing more than gossip though.

No disrespect to our Gabby, but I'm sure they could get 'better' players. Van Persie, Cavani, Hulk etc.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on January 10, 2012, 08:44:41 AM
heard a nasty rumour yesterday that Citeh could be after gabby if they get rid of Tevez. Nothing more than gossip though.

No disrespect to our Gabby, but I'm sure they could get 'better' players. Van Persie, Cavani, Hulk etc.


well it makes sense in a sort of logical 2+2=4 way. Young-ish, english, knows barry and milner, citeh can probably offer us some of their duds on top of anything they get for tevez, they haven't the money to buy big again because of the fairplay thing, and we know our board would probably sanction it. But as i said, this was just mentioned by a citeh fan. No ITK angle to it.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: olaftab on January 10, 2012, 08:48:28 AM
I'd rather morph Gabby and Bent together.

What a fucking player that would make!

That was Drogba at his best.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 10, 2012, 09:16:07 AM
Let us re sign Juan Pablo Angel!!

I'd seriously love it. Don't care if he's shite.

So would I so we could sing "THERES ONLY JUAN PABLO ANGEL........"  ;D
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: taylorsworkrate on January 10, 2012, 09:31:14 AM
maybe hughes will be willing to take Ireland and his pink car?

Fuckin hope not, he's our most talented player.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 10, 2012, 09:32:47 AM
Yes don't sell Ireland now.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: john e on January 10, 2012, 10:08:00 AM
I really is shocking how many people are willing to write the fonz off.

He's 20 (turns 21 next month) so is still younger than many players come through at.

A quick scan shows 20 starts and 38 subs appearances with a return of 10 goals.  Given most of those subs appearances have been 10-15mins at most his record is good enough to deserve a chance to have a run of games, half hour from the bench or the odd start.  Until he's had 7-8games of 30mins+ in the team can we judge him.

I'd have thought people would've learned after all the writing off of Guzan over the last 18months.

As for Keane I don't see the value to it if, as reported, we're having to pay 750k.  I just don't see him having enough impact to justify that.  He was a great player a few years back but he's lost half a yard of pace and hasn't been able to adapt his game to make up for it.


i have to admit i'm one for making quick judgments about players,
 after seeing them once or twice i've made my mind up and its up to them to change it, i wrote the Fonz of years ago, and he's done nothing to change it.
on the other hand Guzan, Bannan, Albrighton, Herd, Clarke, Davis,Cahill, Petrov i liked straight away and still do rate them all,
 whereas NRC,Sidwell,N'Zog,Heskey,Harewood, Downing,Fonz  i didnt rate at all, and still dont

i think i may be the new Bill Shankly , but no ones spotted me yet     ;D
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 10, 2012, 10:14:34 AM
Yes don't sell Ireland now.

I'm not so sure.

Ireland is currently showing the ability we all know he has, with the difference being his head seems to be on straight for a change.  The question being how long will that last?  It's taken 18 months for us to see this, but one little thing could upset the poor lamb again and we'd be back to square one with him - and I don;t want to wait another 18 months!

I'm not usually one to talk down our players, but I just can't see him not becoming a liability again in the not too distant future.  So, I'd be tempted to cash in now if an offer comes in.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on January 10, 2012, 10:17:13 AM
I'd rather morph Gabby and Bent together.

It's an interesting front 3 but Morph hasn't been the same since Tony Hart threw a 7.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 10, 2012, 10:18:43 AM
A quick scan shows 20 starts and 38 subs appearances with a return of 10 goals.

Quick question - how many of those 10 goals came in the PL as opposed to against lesser teams in the cups?  Genuine question and I can remember him getting at least 1 PL goal, but I just can't see where he'll get this run people want him to have as he won't get in up front ahead of Gabby or Bent or wide ahead of N'Zogbia or Super Marc. 

As I said yesterday, I think the best thing for him would be to move on.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 10, 2012, 10:24:08 AM
I definitely think both Fonz and Weimann need another loan spell preferably in the PL to see if they are good enough at this level.  Not sure which PL teams would take a punt on them though. 
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 10, 2012, 10:27:25 AM
A quick scan shows 20 starts and 38 subs appearances with a return of 10 goals.

Quick question - how many of those 10 goals came in the PL as opposed to against lesser teams in the cups?  Genuine question and I can remember him getting at least 1 PL goal, but I just can't see where he'll get this run people want him to have as he won't get in up front ahead of Gabby or Bent or wide ahead of N'Zogbia or Super Marc. 

As I said yesterday, I think the best thing for him would be to move on.

In the PL he has made 10 starts, 29 sub appearances, and scored 3 goals.

It's not very nice to raise doubts like this, but I've not really seen anything from him that makes me think he'll make it.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on January 10, 2012, 10:56:26 AM
I've seen plenty but mainly in the academy and reserves, granted but then there isnt much else to go on. He needs a run of games to settle in and show his stuff, like Gabby had, but I fear he won't get it here at the moment.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 10, 2012, 11:14:36 AM
Anyone else think that Collins will go to Spurs?  Should villa be looking at inlcuding one of their players in that deal?  Krancjar? Bassong?  just a though thats all
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 10, 2012, 11:16:07 AM
Anyone else think that Collins will go to Spurs?  Should villa be looking at inlcuding one of their players in that deal?  Krancjar? Bassong?  just a though thats all

It'd be hilarious if he did, I struggle to think of many players less suited to Spurs' passing game than Collins.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 10, 2012, 11:20:42 AM
Collins is more than capable of playing the simple little passes out of defence.  His issue with us is a mixture of poor movement to give him these options and him getting overly ambitious with balls he's not capable of playing.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: N'ZMAV on January 10, 2012, 11:22:22 AM
Kranjcar and Bassong for Collins. Deal.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 10, 2012, 11:22:47 AM
Collins is more than capable of playing the simple little passes out of defence.  His issue with us is a mixture of poor movement to give him these options and him getting overly ambitious with balls he's not capable of playing.

I'm not at all convinced at that. He pretty much always looks for the pointless hoof, regardless of options around him.

Straight from kick off at Bristol Rovers was a good example, we kick off, ball is played back to Collins, under no pressure, team mates all around him, he just hoofs it 60 yards
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 10, 2012, 11:26:42 AM
Collins is more than capable of playing the simple little passes out of defence.  His issue with us is a mixture of poor movement to give him these options and him getting overly ambitious with balls he's not capable of playing.
I'm not at all convinced at that. He pretty much always looks for the pointless hoof, regardless of options around him.


Straight from kick off at Bristol Rovers was a good example, we kick off, ball is played back to Collins, under no pressure, team mates all around him, he just hoofs it 60 yards

He done it recently in a prem game.  If my memeory serves me correctly, which I doubt, I think it was against Liverpool.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Karl Bridges on January 10, 2012, 11:28:03 AM
I'm a Fonz fan, heard that Norwich wanted him on loan for the second half of the season which would be perfect for us to see how he does. The Robbie Keane deal in total is about £400k that includes wages, loan fee & insurance.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 10, 2012, 11:29:19 AM
The Robbie Keane deal in total is about £400k that includes wages, loan fee & insurance.

That's a more reasonable figure, if correct.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: N'ZMAV on January 10, 2012, 11:29:24 AM
Collins always hoofs. He thinks he's Beckham.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: N'ZMAV on January 10, 2012, 11:30:31 AM
I'm not convinced by Delfouneso, but, to be fair to him, he obviously needs more playing time. I like his direct style. But, he doesn't have that much pace. He needs to do something special in 2012, or he'll just slip off the radar.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Chris Smith on January 10, 2012, 11:36:45 AM
Collins is more than capable of playing the simple little passes out of defence.  His issue with us is a mixture of poor movement to give him these options and him getting overly ambitious with balls he's not capable of playing.

I agree, plus when under pressure I'd much rather see him thump it fifty yards down the pitch than risk getting caught in possession. The problem is he's been outed as a "hoofer" by the mob so he can give 10 straightforward passes but it will be the next one that goes long that will be remembered.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: N'ZMAV on January 10, 2012, 11:38:32 AM
He doesn't quite hoof it as good as Mellberg did.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Hookeysmith on January 10, 2012, 11:50:09 AM
He doesn't quite hoof it as good as Mellberg did.
Funny innit as we all loved mellberg - even with the hoofs

Maybe it was because when it came tyo basic defending and marking Collins could not lick his boots.
When Collins came i thought good deal for a 3rd option for Carlos and Dunne - somehow he managed to get 1st choice and now like a limpet we cannot shift the useless git
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ROBBO on January 10, 2012, 11:52:20 AM
I think the Fonz would have been getting a regular start by now if the manager and coaches thought he was up to it. Who do you drop to give him a run of games, Gabby,Bent? he's nowhere near their standard.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: taylorsworkrate on January 10, 2012, 11:55:23 AM
I think the Fonz would have been getting a regular start by now if the manager and coaches thought he was up to it. Who do you drop to give him a run of games, Gabby,Bent? he's nowhere near their standard.

I don't think Fonz has shown anything that remotely suggests he is going to be a premiership quality forward.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 10, 2012, 12:13:11 PM
Collins is more than capable of playing the simple little passes out of defence.  His issue with us is a mixture of poor movement to give him these options and him getting overly ambitious with balls he's not capable of playing.

I agree, plus when under pressure I'd much rather see him thump it fifty yards down the pitch than risk getting caught in possession. The problem is he's been outed as a "hoofer" by the mob so he can give 10 straightforward passes but it will be the next one that goes long that will be remembered.

Can you not manage a post these days without some provocative nonsense like this in it, Chris?

Is there really any need?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 10, 2012, 12:17:35 PM
All players are capable of making simple passes so one is saying that but ive seen Collins on numerous occasions where he hasn't been under no pressure what so ever and has decided to hoof it up field thus resulting in the opposition gaining possession.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 10, 2012, 12:21:44 PM
Just read we have been linked to Rhys Williams of Boro.  Haven't heard or know anything of him to comment really.  Anyone know about him?

Although the headline of this article says Albion keep tabs on williams, we are mentioned, along with other clubs, who are interested in him.

http://tinyurl.com/7zb2b6d
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Chris Smith on January 10, 2012, 12:26:59 PM
Collins is more than capable of playing the simple little passes out of defence.  His issue with us is a mixture of poor movement to give him these options and him getting overly ambitious with balls he's not capable of playing.

I agree, plus when under pressure I'd much rather see him thump it fifty yards down the pitch than risk getting caught in possession. The problem is he's been outed as a "hoofer" by the mob so he can give 10 straightforward passes but it will be the next one that goes long that will be remembered.

Can you not manage a post these days without some provocative nonsense like this in it, Chris?

Is there really any need?

It isn't provocative It's perfectly true, he's been dubbed a hoofer and so in the eyes of many that's all he ever does. Regardless that most of the time he'll pass it to the full back or across to Dunne as soon as he hits one forward that's all he ever does.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on January 10, 2012, 12:28:21 PM
I think the Fonz would have been getting a regular start by now if the manager and coaches thought he was up to it. Who do you drop to give him a run of games, Gabby,Bent? he's nowhere near their standard.

No, because he's 20 years old and at a similar age a far better footballer than Gabby or Bent. The difference is they had their chance to play regularly at his age. How do we know how good he can be if he doesn't play?
He should have had the game time Heskey has had for instance. Then we'd have a better idea.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 10, 2012, 12:29:05 PM
Collins is more than capable of playing the simple little passes out of defence.  His issue with us is a mixture of poor movement to give him these options and him getting overly ambitious with balls he's not capable of playing.

I agree, plus when under pressure I'd much rather see him thump it fifty yards down the pitch than risk getting caught in possession. The problem is he's been outed as a "hoofer" by the mob so he can give 10 straightforward passes but it will be the next one that goes long that will be remembered.

Can you not manage a post these days without some provocative nonsense like this in it, Chris?

Is there really any need?

It isn't provocative It's perfectly true, he's been dubbed a hoofer and so in the eyes of many that's all he ever does. Regardless that most of the time he'll pass it to the full back or across to Dunne as soon as he hits one forward that's all he ever does.

So, why not say "the many" instead of "the mob", which is just a bit puerile and provocative?

It's possible for a large body of people to take a different opinion than yourself on something without them being "a mob".
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dave on January 10, 2012, 12:34:00 PM
Anyone else think that Collins will go to Spurs?  Should villa be looking at inlcuding one of their players in that deal?  Krancjar? Bassong?  just a though thats all

It'd be hilarious if he did, I struggle to think of many players less suited to Spurs' passing game than Collins.
To be fair, it's not as if Michael Dawson is Franz Beckenbauer.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Chris Smith on January 10, 2012, 12:57:31 PM
Collins is more than capable of playing the simple little passes out of defence.  His issue with us is a mixture of poor movement to give him these options and him getting overly ambitious with balls he's not capable of playing.

I agree, plus when under pressure I'd much rather see him thump it fifty yards down the pitch than risk getting caught in possession. The problem is he's been outed as a "hoofer" by the mob so he can give 10 straightforward passes but it will be the next one that goes long that will be remembered.

Can you not manage a post these days without some provocative nonsense like this in it, Chris?

Is there really any need?

It isn't provocative It's perfectly true, he's been dubbed a hoofer and so in the eyes of many that's all he ever does. Regardless that most of the time he'll pass it to the full back or across to Dunne as soon as he hits one forward that's all he ever does.

So, why not say "the many" instead of "the mob", which is just a bit puerile and provocative?

It's possible for a large body of people to take a different opinion than yourself on something without them being "a mob".

I think mob is the right word, because it's unthinking. It's repeated without any reference to the facts. Collins isn't the best on the ball by any stretch of the imagination but he's Pele compared to Cuellar who is often lionised on here.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulTheVillan on January 10, 2012, 01:16:14 PM
The last 2 games I've watched, it's only took us 7 seconds from kick off for Collins to just whack the ball forward, totally losing posession.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: saunders_heroes on January 10, 2012, 01:18:24 PM
Collins is more than capable of playing the simple little passes out of defence.  His issue with us is a mixture of poor movement to give him these options and him getting overly ambitious with balls he's not capable of playing.

I agree, plus when under pressure I'd much rather see him thump it fifty yards down the pitch than risk getting caught in possession. The problem is he's been outed as a "hoofer" by the mob so he can give 10 straightforward passes but it will be the next one that goes long that will be remembered.

Can you not manage a post these days without some provocative nonsense like this in it, Chris?

Is there really any need?

It isn't provocative It's perfectly true, he's been dubbed a hoofer and so in the eyes of many that's all he ever does. Regardless that most of the time he'll pass it to the full back or across to Dunne as soon as he hits one forward that's all he ever does.

I dont follow the crowd on here, I make my own mind up about players, and whilst I think Collins can defend well (even with the odd mistake thrown in) he most certainly hoofs the ball as much as any Villa player I can remember.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on January 10, 2012, 01:24:18 PM
To me Collins' biggest weakness isn't aimless hoofing, although that drives me up the wall whoever does it. It's his tendency to get sucked to the ball.

As long as we get somebody better in I'd be fine with him going.
But he's a decent enough centre half and can we get somebody better in? Sell him and get Samba.
And by that I mean do a silly latin dance.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ktvillan on January 10, 2012, 01:31:07 PM
Agree with Mazrim, I'm not sure he hoofs it any more than various other players and his main weakness is his repeatedly being drawn out of position and then having to run around like a headless chicken and dive into blocks to try and make up for it. And he gets beaten in the air in the box a little too often for a bloke of his size and for a PL centre half.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Risso on January 10, 2012, 02:10:32 PM
I think the Fonz would have been getting a regular start by now if the manager and coaches thought he was up to it. Who do you drop to give him a run of games, Gabby,Bent? he's nowhere near their standard.

No, because he's 20 years old and at a similar age a far better footballer than Gabby or Bent. The difference is they had their chance to play regularly at his age. How do we know how good he can be if he doesn't play?
He should have had the game time Heskey has had for instance. Then we'd have a better idea.

Bent maybe, Gabby I'd say not. 
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: jembob on January 10, 2012, 02:11:40 PM
All players are capable of making simple passes so one is saying that but ive seen Collins on numerous occasions where he hasn't been under no pressure what so ever and has decided to hoof it up field thus resulting in the opposition gaining possession.

I agree that he boots it too readily however if he had the choice of making a simple pass to a team mate then I'm sure he would be tempted to take that route. The main cause of the hoofing is that there is not enough movement and players are not making themselves available. It's one reason why Petrov gets stick about his sideways passing - if nobody moves into space to get the ball up the pitch, he has little choice than passing back/sideways if he wants to keep possession. 
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 10, 2012, 02:13:36 PM
Another player we have been linked to  - Danny Simpson.  Apparently we are monitoring his situation but cant see any truth in the story

http://tinyurl.com/7ltxj4k
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 10, 2012, 02:14:57 PM
I hoping Hughes doesn't come after Bent now. Not saying he'd get him, but we could do without the aggro.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Irish villain on January 10, 2012, 02:15:05 PM
The Fonz hasn't had the opportunity he deserves because we have so many attacking options at the club. We can play 4-4-2 with Bent and Gabby, we can play 4-5-1 with Gabby wide, Bent alone or with any combination of Albrighton, N'Zogbia, Heskey, Ireland as support. I don't think the Fonz could partner Bent, could he partner Gabby? Hard to tell.

It's a shame as he clearly has talent. Just hard to see where he can slot in.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on January 10, 2012, 02:16:19 PM
I think the Fonz would have been getting a regular start by now if the manager and coaches thought he was up to it. Who do you drop to give him a run of games, Gabby,Bent? he's nowhere near their standard.

No, because he's 20 years old and at a similar age a far better footballer than Gabby or Bent. The difference is they had their chance to play regularly at his age. How do we know how good he can be if he doesn't play?
He should have had the game time Heskey has had for instance. Then we'd have a better idea.

Bent maybe, Gabby I'd say not. 

At 20 years old Gabby was a guided missile. Effective certainly but not really a footballer. He's come on leaps and bounds in that regard. Fonz is and always has been far more natural on the ball with more awareness. Whether he gets the chance to show it or fails to realise his ability remains to be seen.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Fernando Partridge on January 10, 2012, 02:24:44 PM
Yes don't sell Ireland now.

I'm not so sure.

Ireland is currently showing the ability we all know he has, with the difference being his head seems to be on straight for a change.  The question being how long will that last?  It's taken 18 months for us to see this, but one little thing could upset the poor lamb again and we'd be back to square one with him - and I don;t want to wait another 18 months!

I'm not usually one to talk down our players, but I just can't see him not becoming a liability again in the not too distant future.  So, I'd be tempted to cash in now if an offer comes in.

Yes perhaps he stepped up as theres a Transfer Window!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 10, 2012, 02:25:38 PM
Hadn't Bent already rattled in 40 odd goals by the time he was 20/21? Admittedly in the second tier.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: N'ZMAV on January 10, 2012, 02:32:35 PM
The last 2 games I've watched, it's only took us 7 seconds from kick off for Collins to just whack the ball forward, totally losing posession.
I've seen these and on both occasions we've lost posession as soon as the ball has left collins' foot.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: N'ZMAV on January 10, 2012, 02:33:18 PM
As soon as there is any interest, Bent will want to go, we all know that.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on January 10, 2012, 02:43:50 PM
Hadn't Bent already rattled in 40 odd goals by the time he was 20/21? Admittedly in the second tier.

I'm speaking of alround footballing skills. Bent has consistently been a poacher and little else.
Fonz promised that and more.
Fairly tall, quick, good in the air, skillful and an eye for goal. I'd hate to see him go before we've really tested him. Albrighton, Clark and Bannan and before them Gabby, Craig Gardner, Cahill etc all suceeded as first team players because they had decent runs in first team football. They had the chance and the space to learn their trade. Sometimes out of neccessity but true all the same.

Its the lot of a young striker that they are trusted less or for less time than other positions perhaps. Every time Fonz takes the field its like he has to produce immediately or he's "not going to make it". I really want us to give this kid a proper chance to prove himself.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: KRS on January 10, 2012, 02:45:46 PM
As soon as there is any interest, Bent will want to go, we all know that.
Surely Bent would only make a career move to a top 6 club and I dont see any of them either wanting, needing or being able to afford him. I dont see clubs like QPR being able to afford him either and it would be a backward step for his career. If you consider his options, he'd be well advised to stay at VP.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: nick harper on January 10, 2012, 02:51:24 PM
To me, Fonz just doesn't work hard enough when he plays. He doesn't work the channels enough, doesn't give enough movement to the player in posession. Similiar to Bent actually, without the goalscoring reputation.

He has a ton of ability but I'm not sure he wants it enough and we've seen enough of those pass through Villa Park over the years - potential that never quite blooms.

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 10, 2012, 02:56:31 PM
Hadn't Bent already rattled in 40 odd goals by the time he was 20/21? Admittedly in the second tier.

I'm speaking of alround footballing skills. Bent has consistently been a poacher and little else.
Fonz promised that and more.
Fairly tall, quick, good in the air, skillful and an eye for goal. I'd hate to see him go before we've really tested him. Albrighton, Clark and Bannan and before them Gabby, Craig Gardner, Cahill etc all suceeded as first team players because they had decent runs in first team football. They had the chance and the space to learn their trade. Sometimes out of neccessity but true all the same.

Its the lot of a young striker that they are trusted less or for less time than other positions perhaps. Every time Fonz takes the field its like he has to produce immediately or he's "not going to make it". I really want us to give this kid a proper chance to prove himself.

Problem is with Gabby, Bent and probably Keane there is no way he's going to have a run in the first team here. It's one of the reasons i'm against Keane coming in. Despite not being convinced by Fonz (hard to explain why but it's just a feeling I get with him) like you i'd rather try and find out for sure whether he can cut it or not. So do we send him out on loan for a few months? And try and do it with a club that will play him often and as a striker, as didn't Burnley play him as more of a winger?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: andrew08 on January 10, 2012, 02:57:20 PM
Fonz needs a big goal to kick start his Villa career, as stated earlier it was nearly at blues last year and it was nearly at Stoke. Sometimes that's just the way it is. Goals change games and change a strikers future.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: saunders_heroes on January 10, 2012, 02:57:50 PM
How many managers has Fonz worked under at the Villa? None of them have put much faith in him, so perhaps some are kidding themselves that he's going to be a good player.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 10, 2012, 02:59:04 PM
Guys, you're forgetting that Keane is only with us for 6 games so there still is a chance for the Fonz to get a look in after he has gone.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on January 10, 2012, 03:34:23 PM
How many managers has Fonz worked under at the Villa? None of them have put much faith in him, so perhaps some are kidding themselves that he's going to be a good player.

O'Neill did and publically announced he was going to figure more. Then he left. Before that he was getting cup games and doing well. Houllier used him sparingly but he used him.

Anyway, I judge with my own eyes and I've watched him for years to form my opinion. Not how many times certain managers have played him.
And if I'm kidding myself than I'd rather do that and be sure than just throw him out before he's old enough to shave just because he hasn't broke through at 16 like Rooney. Or because manager x isn't brave enough to play him instead of some useless carthorse.

Villa don't have the luxury of getting rid of potentially very good players I'd say. Fonz is definitely that, even if it doesnt end up working out for him.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pedro25 on January 10, 2012, 03:36:49 PM
I don't think I can be convinced Fonz hasn't had the chances he deserves, McLeish could easily have played a fifth midfielder against Liverpool, guys like Bannan have shown more than Fonz this year, but he chose to give him a chance.  As with Herd, Clark and Albrighton if you take that chance the position is yours until your form dictates you are dropped.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TheSandman on January 10, 2012, 03:37:57 PM
Fonz couldn't be any less effective than Heskey.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 10, 2012, 03:38:23 PM
So when would you look to move him on then, Maz?

If he's not doing enough to force his way into the side for the run he needs, then do you drop a better (at the moment at least) player to give him a go or keep giving him new contracts until he does get the chance?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ktvillan on January 10, 2012, 04:18:10 PM
I thought Delfounso had a decent enough first half against Liverpool, good movement, good first touch, although his final ball let him down a couple of times. There does seem to be something missing from him though, perhaps a bit of urgency.  He just seems a bit too languid in his approach to get by in the hurley burley of the PL. 

Also in that game I kept a close eye on Weimann when he came on for the last 10 or 15 minutes. His movement was non-stop, he made some great runs into dangerous areas and not once was he picked out, indeed no-one even appeared to see him let alone try to play him in.  Not even Bannan who is meant to have a good eye for these things. I felt sorry for the lad although we were genreally woeful in that second half and he wasn't alone in wasting his effort.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on January 10, 2012, 05:27:39 PM
the recent loan signings by us and now Pires joining Henry at Arsenal, plus Scholes coming out of retirement at Man U suggests in some ways that the January transfer window is pretty much fucked for all but the super rich or super desperate. Clubs will be held to ransom, and in many ways short term deals look that much more appealing. As the window progesses buying clubs will push the panic button, and clubs that actually want to sell and are holding off for a big offer also get desperate as they know they have to replace the exiting player.

UEFA are better off just having a transfer window that opens on July 1st and ends Feb 28th/29th, kind of like is used to be. The current system, in my opinon is crap and makes clubs do things they would never normally do, or want to do. The only real beneficiaries are agents, and players making fat signing bonuses.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: timeoutbigbar on January 10, 2012, 05:56:48 PM
Discussing James Collins' hoofball tendencies and the Delfouneso's prospects.  I thought I was reading the transfer thread.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Ian. on January 10, 2012, 06:36:15 PM
the recent loan signings by us and now Pires joining Henry at Arsenal, plus Scholes coming out of retirement at Man U suggests in some ways that the January transfer window is pretty much fucked for all but the super rich or super desperate. Clubs will be held to ransom, and in many ways short term deals look that much more appealing. As the window progesses buying clubs will push the panic button, and clubs that actually want to sell and are holding off for a big offer also get desperate as they know they have to replace the exiting player.
Its a mess your right. Get rid of it now. It does not exist elsewhere in life so why should it exist in football?
UEFA are better off just having a transfer window that opens on July 1st and ends Feb 28th/29th, kind of like is used to be. The current system, in my opinon is crap and makes clubs do things they would never normally do, or want to do. The only real beneficiaries are agents, and players making fat signing bonuses.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Villanation on January 10, 2012, 07:31:35 PM
Guys, you're forgetting that Keane is only with us for 6 games so there still is a chance for the Fonz to get a look in after he has gone.

Is that all, so on top of the 400k fee does he receive a wage or does he get paid per appearance. 
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dante Lavelli on January 10, 2012, 08:25:38 PM
Guys, you're forgetting that Keane is only with us for 6 games so there still is a chance for the Fonz to get a look in after he has gone.

Is that all, so on top of the 400k fee does he receive a wage or does he get paid per appearance. 

I assumed that the 400k was the total we were paying including all fees, wages, etc etc.
I'd like to see us recoup a small chunk of that by getting the Fonz and weiman out on loan for the same period.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Matt C on January 10, 2012, 08:38:25 PM
Amazing how much intricate knowledge of a yet to be agreed contract so many people seem to have.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Somniloquism on January 10, 2012, 09:01:45 PM
The last 2 games I've watched, it's only took us 7 seconds from kick off for Collins to just whack the ball forward, totally losing posession.

Well is that the player making atrocious decisions or is it a game plan, hit it for Gabby to try to get on the end early on whilst the opposition are not ready early on. I think SGT had a similar tactic as his game plan from Kick off, at least for England.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Fernando Partridge on January 10, 2012, 09:16:15 PM
Fellow villains does any one know how many loan signings we can make?
And do we have 1 or 2 players on loan- Jenas loan cancelled due to injury or we continue to pay so listed as loan?
Answers below pls
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on January 10, 2012, 10:23:22 PM
So when would you look to move him on then, Maz?

If he's not doing enough to force his way into the side for the run he needs, then do you drop a better (at the moment at least) player to give him a go or keep giving him new contracts until he does get the chance?

When he's had a chance and failed which I would argue is yet to happen. But if we're never going to give him that chance then it may as well be asap.
But then I would say give him the chance. Not instead of Gabby or Bent but instead of Heskey. Which will probably be when Keane has gone back now.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: paul_e on January 10, 2012, 11:36:51 PM
So when would you look to move him on then, Maz?

If he's not doing enough to force his way into the side for the run he needs, then do you drop a better (at the moment at least) player to give him a go or keep giving him new contracts until he does get the chance?

When he's had a chance and failed which I would argue is yet to happen. But if we're never going to give him that chance then it may as well be asap.
But then I would say give him the chance. Not instead of Gabby or Bent but instead of Heskey. Which will probably be when Keane has gone back now.

I think the important thing is a chance to make it doesn't mean 7-8 starts in a row, it means coming off the bench with 30minutes to go regularly rather than in the last 10 minutes for 1 game in 4/5.  At the moment the pressure is all that if he doesn't do something exceptional in that cameo he has more people saying he's never going to make it.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: villadelph on January 11, 2012, 12:02:27 AM
8mil for Aly Cissokho?! Yes, please.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on January 11, 2012, 12:08:59 AM
8mil for Aly Cissokho?! Yes, please.

Eh?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: old man villa fan on January 11, 2012, 07:21:18 AM
So when would you look to move him on then, Maz?

If he's not doing enough to force his way into the side for the run he needs, then do you drop a better (at the moment at least) player to give him a go or keep giving him new contracts until he does get the chance?

When he's had a chance and failed which I would argue is yet to happen. But if we're never going to give him that chance then it may as well be asap.
But then I would say give him the chance. Not instead of Gabby or Bent but instead of Heskey. Which will probably be when Keane has gone back now.

I think the important thing is a chance to make it doesn't mean 7-8 starts in a row, it means coming off the bench with 30minutes to go regularly rather than in the last 10 minutes for 1 game in 4/5.  At the moment the pressure is all that if he doesn't do something exceptional in that cameo he has more people saying he's never going to make it.

Your point about being introduced as substitute more frequently and for longer periods is the key to seeing whether he can make it at this level with Villa.  I believe he can.

McLeish is very much like O'Neill in that he uses substitutes only when necessary and very rarely to change tactics/formation.  So with Delfouneso not being the same type of player as either Bent or Agbonlahor, McLeish sees it difficult to take one off and bring on Delfouneso as it means he has to change is tactics for Nathan to play his natural game or the player has to play a role that is not his natural game.  That is one of my main gripes with McLeish in that he is too rigid and negative.  The cup match against Bristol Rovers was an ideal match to give Delfouneso some more match experience but no, he goes back to tried and tested (and crap) Heskey.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 11, 2012, 07:36:55 AM
Quite why Aly Cissoko has appeared on our transfer thread is beyond me, but there is more chance of signing Ridgewell.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: taylorsworkrate on January 11, 2012, 08:03:26 AM
8mil for Aly Cissokho?! Yes, please.

I think we can put the bullshit / bollocks part of the the thread title back now.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulTheVillan on January 11, 2012, 09:14:42 AM
Guys, you're forgetting that Keane is only with us for 6 games so there still is a chance for the Fonz to get a look in after he has gone.
I really doubt Fonz would have been that involved in those 6 games anyway
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JUAN PABLO on January 11, 2012, 09:34:29 AM
So when would you look to move him on then, Maz?

If he's not doing enough to force his way into the side for the run he needs, then do you drop a better (at the moment at least) player to give him a go or keep giving him new contracts until he does get the chance?

When he's had a chance and failed which I would argue is yet to happen. But if we're never going to give him that chance then it may as well be asap.
But then I would say give him the chance. Not instead of Gabby or Bent but instead of Heskey. Which will probably be when Keane has gone back now.

I think the important thing is a chance to make it doesn't mean 7-8 starts in a row, it means coming off the bench with 30minutes to go regularly rather than in the last 10 minutes for 1 game in 4/5.  At the moment the pressure is all that if he doesn't do something exceptional in that cameo he has more people saying he's never going to make it.

  That is one of my main gripes with McLeish in that he is too rigid and negative.  The cup match against Bristol Rovers was an ideal match to give Delfouneso some more match experience but no, he goes back to tried and tested (and crap) Heskey.


spot on , what was the point of bringing injury prone Heskey on a pitch like that when you are 3-0 up , now the tumbler is out injured for a month , good for us but AMC will be gutted .
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 11, 2012, 09:46:18 AM
So when would you look to move him on then, Maz?

If he's not doing enough to force his way into the side for the run he needs, then do you drop a better (at the moment at least) player to give him a go or keep giving him new contracts until he does get the chance?

When he's had a chance and failed which I would argue is yet to happen. But if we're never going to give him that chance then it may as well be asap.
But then I would say give him the chance. Not instead of Gabby or Bent but instead of Heskey. Which will probably be when Keane has gone back now.

I think the important thing is a chance to make it doesn't mean 7-8 starts in a row, it means coming off the bench with 30minutes to go regularly rather than in the last 10 minutes for 1 game in 4/5.  At the moment the pressure is all that if he doesn't do something exceptional in that cameo he has more people saying he's never going to make it.

Your point about being introduced as substitute more frequently and for longer periods is the key to seeing whether he can make it at this level with Villa.  I believe he can.

McLeish is very much like O'Neill in that he uses substitutes only when necessary and very rarely to change tactics/formation.  So with Delfouneso not being the same type of player as either Bent or Agbonlahor, McLeish sees it difficult to take one off and bring on Delfouneso as it means he has to change is tactics for Nathan to play his natural game or the player has to play a role that is not his natural game.  That is one of my main gripes with McLeish in that he is too rigid and negative.  The cup match against Bristol Rovers was an ideal match to give Delfouneso some more match experience but no, he goes back to tried and tested (and crap) Heskey.

I think that in order to get a run what the Fonz needs is to do more in the cameo's he has.  Not necessarily score everytime, but do something to give the manager a decision to make for the next game.  What then happens is he gets gradually brought into things more, even if it might take an injury to get him a small run of starts, until he's the first team regular the next generation are then trying to dislodge him. 

Unfortunately, that's what hasn't happened (although I agree in games like Bristol he should be used ahead of Heskey) so he's sort of in limbo right now.

As I've said before, I think the best thing for the player himself is to move on to kickstart his career. 
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Vanilla on January 11, 2012, 01:29:19 PM
Fellow villains does any one know how many loan signings we can make?
And do we have 1 or 2 players on loan- Jenas loan cancelled due to injury or we continue to pay so listed as loan?
Answers below pls

As Jenas is signed for the whole season, as nobody put an injury clause in the agreement with Spurs, we are allowed one more for this season.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: toplad4u on January 11, 2012, 02:00:11 PM

8mil for Aly Cissokho?! Yes, please.

I'm sure if Houllier was in charge we would of signed him in the summer..... rumours a deal was struck also for Ba and Cabaye
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 11, 2012, 02:24:06 PM

8mil for Aly Cissokho?! Yes, please.

I'm sure if Houllier was in charge we would of signed him in the summer..... rumours a deal was struck also for Ba and Cabaye

Please dont say things like this as it gets me depressed thinking that we could have had Ba and Cabaye but ended up with Hutton and Jenas :-(
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Chris Smith on January 11, 2012, 03:03:52 PM

8mil for Aly Cissokho?! Yes, please.

I'm sure if Houllier was in charge we would of signed him in the summer..... rumours a deal was struck also for Ba and Cabaye

Other than the having any money and needing to balance the wage bill I can't think of any reason why that wouldn't have happened.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: IRISHPHIL on January 11, 2012, 03:13:29 PM
when keane arrives , think will be ideal  partner for gabby, bent can play alongside ireland
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: LeeB on January 11, 2012, 03:26:15 PM
when keane arrives , think will be ideal  partner for gabby, bent can play alongside ireland

We putting two teams out then?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: garyshawsknee on January 11, 2012, 03:27:50 PM

8mil for Aly Cissokho?! Yes, please.

I'm sure if Houllier was in charge we would of signed him in the summer..... rumours a deal was struck also for Ba and Cabaye

Other than the having any money and needing to balance the wage bill I can't think of any reason why that wouldn't have happened.

We wouldn't have paid off Houllier,or the blues for Mccleish. Houllier would've shifted a few out,and anyway,those two hardly cost Newcastle the earth.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 11, 2012, 03:45:15 PM
Was anyone aware that we were linked to this player - Armin Bacinovic :-
Apparently we have missed out on him.
http://tinyurl.com/7vm3fqs
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulTheVillan on January 11, 2012, 03:48:57 PM

8mil for Aly Cissokho?! Yes, please.

I'm sure if Houllier was in charge we would of signed him in the summer..... rumours a deal was struck also for Ba and Cabaye

Other than the having any money and needing to balance the wage bill I can't think of any reason why that wouldn't have happened.

We wouldn't have paid off Houllier,or the blues for Mccleish. Houllier would've shifted a few out,and anyway,those two hardly cost Newcastle the earth.

IIRC Ba was free & Cabaye was less than £7m

Both are already off to Liverpool knowing the shitty newspapers *rollseyes*
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 11, 2012, 04:12:08 PM
Just heard something really stupid so thought I would share it with you all...  someone on twitter has been saying that Robbie Keane will be signing until May 10th and that Beye will be cancelling loan deal with Doncaster and joining Strasborg on a 3 yr deal lol!
cant see any of that happening but would love it if the latter did come true.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TheSandman on January 11, 2012, 04:13:07 PM
Would it be too much to hope in this dream scenario that we will be getting some cash put our way for young Habib?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 11, 2012, 04:16:36 PM
At his age and with 6 months left I'd doubt it'd anything worth worrying about.  However, if true and we're £40k lighter on the wagebill that may allow AM some room to bring in another player this window.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JUAN PABLO on January 11, 2012, 04:59:07 PM

8mil for Aly Cissokho?! Yes, please.

I'm sure if Houllier was in charge we would of signed him in the summer..... rumours a deal was struck also for Ba and Cabaye

Please dont say things like this as it gets me depressed thinking that we could have had Ba and Cabaye but ended up with Hutton and Jenas :-(

Im already depressed in January
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JUAN PABLO on January 11, 2012, 05:00:40 PM
Just heard something really stupid so thought I would share it with you all...  someone on twitter has been saying that Robbie Keane will be signing until May 10th and that Beye will be cancelling loan deal with Doncaster and joining Strasborg on a 3 yr deal lol!
cant see any of that happening but would love it if the latter did come true.

Theres someone out there more stupid than MON
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 11, 2012, 05:08:15 PM
Just heard something really stupid so thought I would share it with you all...  someone on twitter has been saying that Robbie Keane will be signing until May 10th and that Beye will be cancelling loan deal with Doncaster and joining Strasborg on a 3 yr deal lol!
cant see any of that happening but would love it if the latter did come true.

Theres someone out there more stupid than MON

We can only hope there is but i doubt it very much indeed
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Villanation on January 11, 2012, 07:22:53 PM
when keane arrives , think will be ideal  partner for gabby, bent can play alongside ireland

We putting two teams out then?

Have to, we need the points... ;)
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: spaf on January 11, 2012, 09:00:01 PM

8mil for Aly Cissokho?! Yes, please.

I'm sure if Houllier was in charge we would of signed him in the summer..... rumours a deal was struck also for Ba and Cabaye

Other than the having any money and needing to balance the wage bill I can't think of any reason why that wouldn't have happened.

We wouldn't have paid off Houllier,or the blues for Mccleish. Houllier would've shifted a few out,and anyway,those two hardly cost Newcastle the earth.

IIRC Ba was free & Cabaye was less than £7m

Both are already off to Liverpool knowing the shitty newspapers *rollseyes*
My Newcastle supporting mate is under the impression that Cabaye cost only £4m, because that was the size of his release clause in his Lille contract.

Newcastle are now apparently looking seriously at four more players from France.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 11, 2012, 09:21:29 PM
I read Graham Carr is their main scout in France and has been responsible for those coming over.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dave on January 11, 2012, 09:33:47 PM

8mil for Aly Cissokho?! Yes, please.

I'm sure if Houllier was in charge we would of signed him in the summer..... rumours a deal was struck also for Ba and Cabaye

Other than the having any money and needing to balance the wage bill I can't think of any reason why that wouldn't have happened.
Cabaye cost £4.7m and Ba was free.

Do you think we paid for N'Zogbia's £10m transfer fee and his monthly salary with sweets and IOUs?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 11, 2012, 11:37:08 PM

8mil for Aly Cissokho?! Yes, please.

I'm sure if Houllier was in charge we would of signed him in the summer..... rumours a deal was struck also for Ba and Cabaye

Other than the having any money and needing to balance the wage bill I can't think of any reason why that wouldn't have happened.
Cabaye cost £4.7m and Ba was free.

Do you think we paid for N'Zogbia's £10m transfer fee and his monthly salary with sweets and IOUs?

It's ok, Dave, Alan Hutton actually cost nothing and pays us for the right to play for us, too.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JJ-AV on January 11, 2012, 11:46:31 PM
I'd love to know who Houllier would have signed. Cabaye seems like it would have happened. There was that French 'keeper who had a look round Villa Park too wasn't there? And Makoun would have had a run.

Suppose he'd have probably have sold Gabby though, so it's swings and roundabouts.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: eamonn on January 11, 2012, 11:51:22 PM
Just on Fonz again, MON held him in high regard and given his new team's lack of firepower I wouldn't be at all surprised if Sunderland came in for him. In the ''Who will MON buy off us first?'' sweepstake, he'd be my choice.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 11, 2012, 11:53:49 PM
There was a lot of interest in Samba too wasn't there? Anyhow, I think we would have had a pretty impressive side on a pretty small net spend compared to what we have now. Houllier was the right man IMO, he had the dressing room sussed and knew how to get it sorted. For me it is a massive shame he did not get a full run at it.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: maidstonevillain on January 12, 2012, 08:42:54 AM
There was a lot of interest in Samba too wasn't there? Anyhow, I think we would have had a pretty impressive side on a pretty small net spend compared to what we have now. Houllier was the right man IMO, he had the dressing room sussed and knew how to get it sorted. For me it is a massive shame he did not get a full run at it.

Could not agree more.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Fernando Partridge on January 12, 2012, 09:56:47 AM
Fellow villains does any one know how many loan signings we can make?
And do we have 1 or 2 players on loan- Jenas loan cancelled due to injury or we continue to pay so listed as loan?
Answers below pls

As Jenas is signed for the whole season, as nobody put an injury clause in the agreement with Spurs, we are allowed one more for this season.

Thanking you
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 12, 2012, 09:58:08 AM
But didn't his medical clearance to return to work not kick in until after the pre-season had started?  And how were we to know there wouldn't be a further complications at a later date?

Taking the football argument out of it for a moment, the club may well have acted purely due to health reasons.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 12, 2012, 10:02:02 AM
At last, AVFC have tweeted that they have completed the signing of Keane.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 12, 2012, 10:07:13 AM
On Twitter

AVFCOfficial Aston Villa FC
Aston Villa are pleased to confirm that a loan deal has been agreed with LA Galaxy for Republic of Ireland international Robbie Keane. #avfc
9 minutes ago
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: john e on January 12, 2012, 10:07:18 AM
There was a lot of interest in Samba too wasn't there? Anyhow, I think we would have had a pretty impressive side on a pretty small net spend compared to what we have now. Houllier was the right man IMO, he had the dressing room sussed and knew how to get it sorted. For me it is a massive shame he did not get a full run at it.


i agree with what you say,
 at first i thought randy was looking to get rid of GH but now think it was the best thing for him as his health was certainly a worry, and GH himself has said as much, he wont manage again at any top level,
 so i suppose it goes down as one of those unlucky episodes, under 'what might have been'
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: jembob on January 12, 2012, 10:35:53 AM
Darren Gibson to Everton for £2m - phew!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Phil from the upper holte on January 12, 2012, 10:38:16 AM
I read in the metro that Bolton want Dunne to replace Cahill..Yes please
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Chris Smith on January 12, 2012, 10:39:25 AM
There was a lot of interest in Samba too wasn't there? Anyhow, I think we would have had a pretty impressive side on a pretty small net spend compared to what we have now. Houllier was the right man IMO, he had the dressing room sussed and knew how to get it sorted. For me it is a massive shame he did not get a full run at it.

I think he knew how to piss off the dressing room, little sign that he knew how to sort it. We lost 6 first team regulars in the summer as it was, there would probably have been another 3 or 4 out if the door had he stayed. That's a huge rebuilding job and I think we'd be worse off because of it.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 12, 2012, 10:39:34 AM
I think Gidson gets some unfair stick on here and is a good signing for £2m.  I would want him for us as we already have Bannan, Ireland and Gardner in that position, but still a decent bit of business for Everton.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 12, 2012, 10:41:15 AM
I read in the metro that Bolton want Dunne to replace Cahill..Yes please

No thanks!

We'll need Dunne for the rest of this season, so as I can't see a replacement coming in this month it's be an awful bit of business.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 12, 2012, 10:44:37 AM
I read in the metro that Bolton want Dunne to replace Cahill..Yes please

WHY?  Who would be get to replace him and please do not say Samba as we all know if he had a choice between spurs and villa he would choose spurs fact.  Selling Dunne at this stage would be horrendous business
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Summers on January 12, 2012, 11:18:14 AM
Dunne's been, overall, in decent form this season. Selling him would be a mistake right now.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Summers on January 12, 2012, 11:29:56 AM
Also.. Fonz & Delph apparently on the loan list. Hopefully they both go to low Prem/high Championship sides and get a good run of games and some form. Fonz especially needs a run of games upfront so he can get scoring.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: paulcomben on January 12, 2012, 12:06:53 PM
Signing anyone on the 11th of the month would have made MON giddy. Noting that he has not made any signings, even though he must want new blood at the Mackems.  His usual last minute tactic, with which we became so familiar.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 12, 2012, 12:11:58 PM
I wonder if this window is markedly slower than it usually is?

There's been next to zero business other than a couple of MLS loans. I know it is early days, but was it this quiet last year?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: supertom on January 12, 2012, 12:16:41 PM
Last Jan was quiet but not this quiet.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: levico on January 12, 2012, 12:22:44 PM
Whatever happens in the transfer window will be very telling for our club both in terms of who comes in (if anyone) and who leaves. It will signal the club's ambition either way.

My gut feeling (having had my expectations well and truly managed) is that whoever comes in will be wrong and who ever leaves will be the wrong man. I hope I'm wrong - I was last January.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Matt C on January 12, 2012, 01:12:40 PM
Fonz and Delph earmarked for loan deals:
http://www.birminghammail.net/birmingham-sport/aston-villa-fc/aston-villa-news/2012/01/12/aston-villa-nathan-delfouneso-and-fabian-delph-earmarked-for-loan-moves-97319-30108848/
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on January 12, 2012, 01:23:30 PM
I wonder if this window is markedly slower than it usually is?

There's been next to zero business other than a couple of MLS loans. I know it is early days, but was it this quiet last year?

Paulie I made the comment earlier myself. My thoughts are that the loans we've seen and the fact that even Man U have resorted to bringing a player out of retirement is a real indictment on the current transfer window. Even clubs like Man City that can simply open the chequebook haven't. That they know if they want a player that the selling club is going to take the piss. It's the same at the lower end of the food chain, and Hughes is going to find that out at QPR. Clubs know he wants to do business and they have a bit of cash so he will have to accept getting fucked in order to do a couple of deals. I don't think most clubs have the appetite for that. It is early, but the January is more of a farce than anything helpful or truly constructive.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 12, 2012, 01:34:16 PM
I think Delph definitely needs a loan.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: N'Rexy on January 12, 2012, 02:33:17 PM
Lots of transfer windows are driven by one or two clubs kicking things off.  It needs QPR or Citeh to pay stupid money for 2-3 palyers nad then we'll be off.  I do think that the financial fair play thing mught be having an impact too as clubs look to control their outlay.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Brend'Watkins on January 12, 2012, 03:07:06 PM
I wonder if this window is markedly slower than it usually is?

There's been next to zero business other than a couple of MLS loans. I know it is early days, but was it this quiet last year?

I honestly think that but for a few clubs or just one club  there is a general tightening of strings in football.  We are not the only ones watching the wages to turnover ratio. 

I wouldn't even be surprised that PL clubs have got together as a collective and have forced a strategy to drive down player wage demands.  The days of pay me X or I'll be off to Y could be coming to an end.  Look at the stance Chelsea have taken with the Bolton defender for instance. 

Having said that, by the end of the month this could prove to be bollox.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: stubbsyandy on January 12, 2012, 03:09:37 PM
Last year was a very busy window, but the year before was like this. I think last year a total of £150m, but 2010 only £16m!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: David_Nab on January 12, 2012, 03:30:44 PM
City are only going to be buying if they can sell Tevez (Looking likely now AC Milan have sold Pato for £35mil) and even then I imagine they will buy from abroad so I really don't see much big hitting in this window other than QPR spending to stay up
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Matt C on January 12, 2012, 04:01:54 PM
I guess last year the January window figures were distorted by the Torres/Carroll madness.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 12, 2012, 04:12:59 PM
212million last year. It is a horrible window and should be scrapped. In fact, I reckon the rules should get more stringent, with each club having to have a minimum of 5 youth developed players in the match day squad, and the window shutting on the 31st August, and not opening again until the season is over.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 12, 2012, 04:19:39 PM
Having it close on 31/8 until the following summer just favours the big clubs though, who have the finances to fund a big squad.  Less well off clubs can't afford as much quality in reserve, so would be fucked and face a relegation battle if they have a key injury and aren;t allowed to get someone new in.

I'd go back to the old system where it was close at (I think?) end of March until the summer.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 12, 2012, 04:47:03 PM
Apparently, according to James Nursey (midland journo for the mirror), that MON has said that Craig Gardner is homesick. He says that a move to either WBA or Villa might be possible but Sunderland would want the money they paid for him, back.
I dont know why but I have a feeling that he may be coming back to us. The gardner brothers to be future villa CM's??
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 12, 2012, 04:56:18 PM
£5 or £6 million for Gardner, I don't fucking think so.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Tom wintle on January 12, 2012, 05:11:35 PM
COLLINS makes Dunne look rubbish with a different defensive partner i think Dunne would be good or better than he is now.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: bertlambshank on January 12, 2012, 05:13:56 PM
£5 or £6 million for Gardner, I don't fucking think so.
Swop him for Collins.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 12, 2012, 05:18:03 PM
£5 or £6 million for Gardner, I don't fucking think so.
Swop him for Collins.

A transfer involving collins could be a possibility.  How would people feel about him coming back? He left as he wanted first team football which is fine.  Blues came in for him and then he admits he is a blue nose.  Is that such a crime?  I dont know..... :-\
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Percy McCarthy on January 12, 2012, 05:24:05 PM
I don't care about the b-lose business, he never gave less than his all for us. Wouldn't be opening the champagne about having him back though.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 12, 2012, 05:25:56 PM
£5 or £6 million for Gardner, I don't fucking think so.
Swop him for Collins.

A transfer involving collins could be a possibility.  How would people feel about him coming back? He left as he wanted first team football which is fine.  Blues came in for him and then he admits he is a blue nose.  Is that such a crime?  I dont know..... :-\

I just don't think he's very good.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Ger Regan on January 12, 2012, 05:29:13 PM
He's not very good, but would probably be a better right back than Hutton.....
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Summers on January 12, 2012, 05:34:55 PM
He's alright. He tries hard, scores goals, and puts himself about. How he handled himself after his move was poor, mind. And really, unless he's in as a bench warmer, we need to be after better.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Matt C on January 12, 2012, 05:36:49 PM
If our Martin wants to do swaps he can take Beye and/or Heskey!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Salsa Party Animal on January 12, 2012, 05:38:28 PM
Villa should say to MON - Take Heskey and Collins in return for Gardner, and we will allow Nathan and Delph to join you on loan if needed.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dante Lavelli on January 12, 2012, 05:42:34 PM
Sounds a bit backwards, but the point of our youth system should be to produce players like Gardner rather than buy them at 6m.  We need to give them - the yoof - more of a chance so they can realise their potential at Villa rather than elsewhere.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 12, 2012, 05:43:42 PM
I don't care about the b-lose business, he never gave less than his all for us. Wouldn't be opening the champagne about having him back though.

I agree, he always gave his best for us, so who he supported made little difference (although he was daft to allow himself to get into that mess).

I always thought he was a decent player, had a pretty good shot on him, too. Not suggesting we should sign him, just saying, I thought he was decent.

I wonder if "homesick" means "doesn't fancy another extended spell at right back"?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Fernando Partridge on January 12, 2012, 05:47:04 PM
Maynard  turned down a move to Wolves. Bristol City to announce Chris Wood arrival from West Brom on Loan. Maynard due to go WBA. Why don't we offer the fonz and nip in for Maynard? oh yeah we have no money!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: paul_e on January 12, 2012, 05:51:48 PM
I don't care about the b-lose business, he never gave less than his all for us. Wouldn't be opening the champagne about having him back though.

I agree, he always gave his best for us, so who he supported made little difference (although he was daft to allow himself to get into that mess).

I always thought he was a decent player, had a pretty good shot on him, too. Not suggesting we should sign him, just saying, I thought he was decent.

I wonder if "homesick" means "doesn't fancy another extended spell at right back"?

I put homesick down as meaning 'I don't want to play for the guy that sold me to Blues'.  A feeling I'm sure we can all understand.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: glasses on January 12, 2012, 06:12:13 PM
There may be some truth in the above, but I'd go with he is homesick because Sunderland is a Shit hole.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: N'ZMAV on January 12, 2012, 06:15:23 PM
What's this about Scott Dann?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 12, 2012, 06:18:40 PM
That's a bit odd and I severely doubt it.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: nick harper on January 12, 2012, 06:21:16 PM
I thought Gardner did well for Blues last season. Double figures in goals in a side not renowned for attacking football was a decent achievement. He's become a better player since he left us. I bet McLeish would like him - £3m would be about right.

Let's face it, this is the player market we're in for the foreseeable future.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Matt C on January 12, 2012, 06:28:20 PM
What's this about Scott Dann?

http://t.co/tYBw8iXp
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: N'ZMAV on January 12, 2012, 06:29:20 PM
Did Dann play for the SHA before his move to BRFC? if so, surely he can't play for 3 teams in a season... isn't that against FA rules?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TheSandman on January 12, 2012, 06:33:00 PM
Agree that loaning out Fonz and Delph would be a good move. Let them pick up some confidence and see how good they really are with regular football elsewhere.

I always liked Gardner when he was with us. He wasn't the greatest but I always liked his shot and psycho stare. I just think spending £6million on him would not be the best move especially considering all the water that has passed under the bridge since then. Some people will just not take to him coming back, probably even more so than with McLeish.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: KevinGage on January 12, 2012, 06:45:28 PM
£5 or £6 million for Gardner, I don't fucking think so.
Swop him for Collins.

A transfer involving collins could be a possibility.  How would people feel about him coming back? He left as he wanted first team football which is fine.  Blues came in for him and then he admits he is a blue nose.  Is that such a crime?  I dont know..... :-\

Would be happy to see Collins go, but not so happy to see Gardner come back in return.

I do think he should have featured more under MON -considering the likes of Sidwell and Heskey were often getting in in front of him.   But he's not all that, in all honesty.  And he didn't just burn his bridges when he left for that lot - he carpet bombed them beyond all recognition with his comments afterwards.

I'm also not a huge fan of well paid footballers that move to the other end of the country and plead homesickness. 

It's Sunderland, not Murmansk you pussy.  Stick it out.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 12, 2012, 06:52:22 PM
Dann would be a decent buy, should have in the summer IMO as Blackburn only paid 4 or 5 million in the end. Blues mates say he organised them at the back.

Gardner senior is a good player in the centre of the park, we could do a lot worse.

Collins going for either would be great business, Warnock thrown in would be just fab!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: eamonn on January 12, 2012, 07:00:57 PM
I thought you couldn't stand Gargoyle Gardner?!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on January 12, 2012, 07:11:11 PM
Dann would be a decent buy, should have in the summer IMO as Blackburn only paid 4 or 5 million in the end. Blues mates say he organised them at the back.

Gardner senior is a good player in the centre of the park, we could do a lot worse.

Collins going for either would be great business, Warnock thrown in would be just fab!

Dann's lost his way a bit up there and he'd have been a solid signing for us in the summer. I understand that aside from the financials McLeish will have wanted to give the current lot a go. Still, the 'noses suffered last season when he got hurt. IMO he'd be a solid CB next to Dunne.

As for Gardner, badge kissing aside he's another solid player to have around. Scoring 10 times with that lot takes some doing and I get the impression McLeish likes getting goals from midfield, or at least to have a midfielder with the engine to join the attack. It's Ireland's to lose in that respect right now and he's really only getting that chance because Jenas never made it. For the right price he'd be a good signing, but he'll never be the type of signing that will really, truly push us on.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: WALTERS WARRIORS on January 12, 2012, 07:27:03 PM
A great offer would be Collins and Warnock for Samba ?? No cash and two rather large wages out the window Literally :-))
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Villanation on January 12, 2012, 07:37:22 PM
Are we actually going to spend some dosh, is anybody going to buy a player of has the window prematurely closed.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on January 12, 2012, 07:41:55 PM
We'd better after wasting all that money on Keane
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: KevinGage on January 12, 2012, 07:43:46 PM
Apologies if I've missed it, but how would we get around the 'can't be registered with three clubs in the one year' rule vis a vis Dann?

If it can be done and we can get shot of Collins this window, that would be a great bit of business in all honesty.  Dann isn't a world beater, but he would be an upgrade on Ginge.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on January 12, 2012, 07:44:36 PM
all that money....millions and millions ain't it Greg? Especially as everyone around are going crazy buying players. Lerner out!!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Summers on January 12, 2012, 07:47:40 PM
Collins and a couple of mil for Dann would be great business.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Villanation on January 12, 2012, 07:48:50 PM
Collins and a couple of mil for Dann would be great business.

Makes sense, not sure how much Dunne has got left in the tank either.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on January 12, 2012, 07:53:41 PM
Anyway isn't Dann out for a month or so after nearly having his knackers removed in a game recently? Can't see it happening
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 12, 2012, 07:58:47 PM
According to physioroom Dann is due back the 21st.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Villanation on January 12, 2012, 08:00:47 PM
Anyway isn't Dann out for a month or so after nearly having his knackers removed in a game recently? Can't see it happening

He's Ok now, they stitched them back on, the only downside is he can now call for the ball in Soprano.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on January 12, 2012, 08:21:44 PM
According to physioroom Dann is due back the 21st.


yeah its the thought of it though. Makes me feel funny just thinking about it. If we signed him i'd be forever worrying he was gonna split the stitches during a match.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 12, 2012, 08:23:28 PM
According to physioroom Dann is due back the 21st.


yeah its the thought of it though. Makes me feel funny just thinking about it. If we signed him i'd be forever worrying he was gonna split the stitches during a match.

At least we know he has a pair. Unlike a certain rat faced winger currently helping the police with their inquiries.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on January 12, 2012, 08:24:26 PM
Anyway isn't Dann out for a month or so after nearly having his knackers removed in a game recently? Can't see it happening

He's Ok now, they stitched them back on, the only downside is he can now call for the ball in Soprano.

heheheh. Got a voice so high only dogs can hear him
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on January 12, 2012, 08:26:09 PM
According to physioroom Dann is due back the 21st.


yeah its the thought of it though. Makes me feel funny just thinking about it. If we signed him i'd be forever worrying he was gonna split the stitches during a match.

At least we know he has a pair. Unlike a certain rat faced winger currently helping the police with their inquiries.


Liverpool guy on another forum was discussing him today. The terms "gutless" and "coward" were used. So it weren't just us
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: KevinGage on January 12, 2012, 08:44:55 PM
I might be in a minority, but I'd have him back.

If you accept that he is a bit of a pansy, and you know you're not going to get Shaun Teale style tackling  (or just about any sort of tackling for that matter) out of him, he does what most wingers should do - create chances and score goals.

True, he hasn't been doing much of that for the Redscouse. And I wonder if he regrets the move now.  He took a lot of stick for leaving in the manner he did, but after seeing another one of our best players depart and a duffer like McLeish appointed, it was pretty clear that we weren't even trying to create the illusion of giving it a go this year.   

For a player in the England squad, who hasn't come through the ranks and has no real connection with the area, it's to be expected that he wants to spend the best years of his career actively competing for trophies/ success.  And he'll want to play for a club where he thinks he is best placed to do that.  That was us in 2009.  But not in 2011.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: timeoutbigbar on January 12, 2012, 08:47:23 PM
Wouldn't touch Craig Gardner.  For me it would be in the same category as us bringing back Downing.  If he was a blose fan, then fine, but don't pretend to be one or the other.  Turncoat.

Edit: That, and I don't particularly rate him as a player either.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: gervilla on January 12, 2012, 08:53:44 PM
Craig Gardner just isn't good enough .
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: saunders_heroes on January 12, 2012, 08:57:00 PM
Craig Gardner just isn't good enough .

That just about sums him up. An average player with a good shot.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: villa `cross the mersey on January 12, 2012, 09:01:36 PM
I don't care about the b-lose business, he never gave less than his all for us. Wouldn't be opening the champagne about having him back though.
... strange I put you down as being a "brown and mild" sort of guy :)
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Trinitymiddle on January 12, 2012, 09:14:02 PM
Dann would be a decent buy, should have in the summer IMO as Blackburn only paid 4 or 5 million in the end. Blues mates say he organised them at the back.

Gardner senior is a good player in the centre of the park, we could do a lot worse.

Collins going for either would be great business, Warnock thrown in would be just fab!

I heard that part of the agreement with SHA re: McLeish's departure was that we couldn't sign any of their players for 6 months. That's why we didn't get him inin the summer.

I've also heard that Dann was the main man in their defence last season. Highly rated.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: eamonn on January 12, 2012, 11:04:09 PM
What was that about Desperate Dann, he split open his sac?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on January 12, 2012, 11:35:13 PM
What was that about Desperate Dann, he split open his sac?

ruptured  his two veg  during a game.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Matt C on January 12, 2012, 11:35:25 PM
Talking of average players with a good shot, sounds like Darron Gibson is off to Everton.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Karl Bridges on January 12, 2012, 11:42:55 PM
Less than £1.5m according to a journo on Twitter. I'd still pass on that one even at that price.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 13, 2012, 12:05:51 AM
Very little to lose at that price though you would think, he plays well and scores a few it will look a decent deal. Moyes does ok with United cast offs
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on January 13, 2012, 01:25:17 AM
He's not a good player though. Gladly avoided.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Trinitymiddle on January 13, 2012, 06:05:15 AM
Could've been the new Djemba-Djemba.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Shrek on January 13, 2012, 06:09:52 AM
He's not a good player though. Gladly avoided.

Problem is we've heard the same said about players such as Jamie Ohara, Younas Kaboul and Kevin prince Boateng, then they go and play well elsewhere and we think we've missed out.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Percy McCarthy on January 13, 2012, 07:01:59 AM
Yes, our player spotting skills are hardly legendary.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Small Rodent on January 13, 2012, 09:13:58 AM
Yes, our player spotting skills are hardly legendary.


What's our Dutch scout Artur Numan up to?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: N'ZMAV on January 13, 2012, 10:00:05 AM
If we sold Darren Bent, big if, but I'd go for Fletcher (Wolves) Hoilett (Blackburn) Corluka & Bassong (Spurs)
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Fernando Partridge on January 13, 2012, 10:01:13 AM
I see Stevie Gerrard has no ambition of winning a premier league medal by signing a new contract with Liverpool.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 13, 2012, 10:34:31 AM
Craig Gardner?  A strange one if true as I'd put him behind all our present midfielders - at best he's on a par with herd.

Dann?  Yes, please.  An organiser and would compliment Dunne better than Collins does.  Didn't Mcleish say in the 'secret' meeting with fans representatives just after he came that he saw Dann as a real star player?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Steve R on January 13, 2012, 12:24:25 PM
I see Stevie Gerrard has no ambition of winning a premier league medal by signing a new contract with Liverpool.

On the upside, he does get to keep his kneecaps.

I think I missed an 'allegedly' out somewhere there.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 13, 2012, 01:10:20 PM
Some agent has said we are seriously interested in Bacinovic of Palermo.


I know nothing about him, so anyone that does please enlighten us?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Matt C on January 13, 2012, 01:13:31 PM
Link to Bacinovic story: http://t.co/AeCUqpDi
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 13, 2012, 01:13:49 PM
Having looked him up on football manager, if he is half as good as he is on there then fingers crossed, looks a bit of a beast.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 13, 2012, 01:31:19 PM
Link to Bacinovic story: http://t.co/AeCUqpDi

When was the last time we were described as 'Midlands giants'??

Defensive midfielder, isn't he?  My guess is that, if true, he's the long talked about Petrov replacement.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: nick harper on January 13, 2012, 01:45:42 PM
Craig Gardner?  A strange one if true as I'd put him behind all our present midfielders - at best he's on a par with herd.

Dann?  Yes, please.  An organiser and would compliment Dunne better than Collins does.  Didn't Mcleish say in the 'secret' meeting with fans representatives just after he came that he saw Dann as a real star player?

Think there's a bit of anti- Gardner bias going on to be honest. In terms of the players we have available at present, only Petrov is clearly better. Clark, Herd, Delph and Bannan are all finding their way and to be honest only Clark looks like being a long term fixture in the side.

I'm not saying we should not aim better than Gardner, but our midfield is as poor as I can remember at the moment and as an aggressive box to box midfielder who scores goals, he would certainly get in the side at the moment.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 13, 2012, 01:57:01 PM
I wasn't think of Delph when I made my initial post, so I'll give you that one, especially based on current form.  After that?

Petrov - no, as you say yourself
Clark - different role to Gardner, so can't see him displacing him
Ireland & Bannan - both have more inventiveness about their play, so as the most advanced of a 3 I'd play either ahead of Craig.

I don't think he's a bad player, just that he'd be a sideways move for us at best, so the money would be effectively wasted.     
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on January 13, 2012, 02:30:34 PM
McLeish was never afraid to venture into foreign waters to find players at his previous gigs. I wouldn't be surprised at all if he viewed the British maret as completely overpriced and started to look abroad for financially responsible additions to the squad. A sensible foreign policy, a keen eye on the lower divisions and a top academy is the way forward for us.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 13, 2012, 02:51:06 PM
McLeish was never afraid to venture into foreign waters to find players at his previous gigs. I wouldn't be surprised at all if he viewed the British maret as completely overpriced and started to look abroad for financially responsible additions to the squad. A sensible foreign policy, a keen eye on the lower divisions and a top academy is the way forward for us.

I think age is too. I would not want to see any big contract to a player over 27, possibly even 25. Sell on value is vital. See Spurs, Newcastle and Arsenal as models of this.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on January 13, 2012, 03:16:42 PM
McLeish was never afraid to venture into foreign waters to find players at his previous gigs. I wouldn't be surprised at all if he viewed the British maret as completely overpriced and started to look abroad for financially responsible additions to the squad. A sensible foreign policy, a keen eye on the lower divisions and a top academy is the way forward for us.

I think age is too. I would not want to see any big contract to a player over 27, possibly even 25. Sell on value is vital. See Spurs, Newcastle and Arsenal as models of this.


yep. I imagine the club want to have a balance between kids and experienced pros with an average squad age around 25-26. I agree that sell on value is critical as this applies to everyone but a select few. Wenger's ability to sell players at the right time made the club a lot of money early on. His stubborness and an unwillingness to spend stupidly or indeed at the right time to keep up has held them back in recent years from winning things. Fact is, that is still a very sound model for us to emulate.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 13, 2012, 03:24:51 PM
Problem is that should a player be in the 25-30 age bracket then they are in their prime and will be looking for top whack wages - see Darren Bent.  That's OK, provided we get the right ones that contributes well for it.  And even if we sign them at 21 or so on a smaller contract, then when they hit that age and new contracts get negotiated, then we'll be paying the going rate or seeing them walk.  I think it's much more important to get the fee right for them, whereby we can make that back, or indeed a profit, on the larger signings, but limit our exposure when they're older by looking as smaller fees.

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: barrysleftfoot on January 13, 2012, 03:29:27 PM

  I would'nt buy anyone over 26 tbh, my targets would be players like Capoue, players who might be great players, but not quite at the moment.

  I would'nt criticise MON for buying Davies, or Delph for example.........gambles, but so was Milner, Young and Downing, and they all worked.

  Its no coincedence that they were all youngish signings, and we got money for them, the older players he bought, are generally still here.

 Capoue, Long, are the kind of signings i would be looking at.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 13, 2012, 03:32:32 PM
Eck has said that James Collins is moving into a new house near the area so should end rumours of him moving to another clu but he has admitted that he is a wanted man.  This info was tweeted by Mat Kendrick.

Also, he doesn't believe we are after Scott Dann.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on January 13, 2012, 03:34:05 PM
Problem is that should a player be in the 25-30 age bracket then they are in their prime and will be looking for top whack wages - see Darren Bent.  That's OK, provided we get the right ones that contributes well for it.  And even if we sign them at 21 or so on a smaller contract, then when they hit that age and new contracts get negotiated, then we'll be paying the going rate or seeing them walk.  I think it's much more important to get the fee right for them, whereby we can make that back, or indeed a profit, on the larger signings, but limit our exposure when they're older by looking as smaller fees.



I don't think the club will haver an issue of giving a contract to a top pro like Bent, or Ash if he was still here. It's the Johnny Average bench warmers getting stupid money that has to stop. I think you need the odd 27-30 top player in every team to not only add that quality, but to help with the overall development and success of the club.

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Hoppo on January 13, 2012, 03:44:04 PM
Heard a whisper Mr Delfouneso is going to Small Heath after the weekend. Not happy if this happens anyone but them!!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 13, 2012, 03:49:14 PM
Heard a whisper Mr Delfouneso is going to Small Heath after the weekend. Not happy if this happens anyone but them!!

Don't believe this story
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 13, 2012, 04:11:24 PM
Heard a whisper Mr Delfouneso is going to Small Heath after the weekend. Not happy if this happens anyone but them!!

Why, though?

Who cares if it is them if it helps him improve?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Hoppo on January 13, 2012, 04:19:22 PM
Why help them? if you have to ask that question you just will never get it. Dont want to get into the being a Brummie Villa fan and all that but when you were brought up in Kings Norton and had to put up with the Kings Norton Zulu Juniors every time you came back from a game or a tot up town. Lets just say hatred for anything Small Heath never dies..
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 13, 2012, 04:21:17 PM
Heard a whisper Mr Delfouneso is going to Small Heath after the weekend. Not happy if this happens anyone but them!!

Why, though?

Who cares if it is them if it helps him improve?

A couple of negatives I can see from this 1)He may help them get promoted 2)If he is not playing too well their moron fans will get on his back, as he is a villa player, and this could affect his confidence even more.

I'm not fussed where he goes to be honest as long as he gets game time to help improve his overall game.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 13, 2012, 04:23:29 PM
We've slipped a fair way in the last year or two, but we'd have to go on a slide of titanic proportions to get insecure enough to worry about helping them.

Blues are an absolute nothing club, always have been, and always will be, so helping them out in any way is really about as threatening to us as Mrs Miggins Pie Shop expanding into sausage rolls is to Tesco.

If you're still worried, look at it the other way, if he does help them, they'll have had to come to us to get that help. Another reason to patronise them as we've been doing quite nicely since 1875.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 13, 2012, 04:24:26 PM
Why help them? if you have to ask that question you just will never get it. Dont want to get into the being a Brummie Villa fan and all that but when you were brought up in Kings Norton and had to put up with the Kings Norton Zulu Juniors every time you came back from a game or a tot up town. Lets just say hatred for anything Small Heath never dies..

I'm a Brummie villa fan myself, and I was brought up in a mainly nose area, too, so I know all about that.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Tom wintle on January 13, 2012, 04:24:59 PM
some of you will not agree but i would like to see at villa would be Dembele i have been watching him and he looks very good a the creative player we need.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Hoppo on January 13, 2012, 04:26:53 PM
I always knew you were the best miod on here Paulie!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 13, 2012, 04:28:25 PM
A couple of negatives I can see from this 1)He may help them get promoted 2)If he is not playing too well their moron fans will get on his back, as he is a villa player, and this could affect his confidence even more.

I'm not fussed where he goes to be honest as long as he gets game time to help improve his overall game.

That is a good point. 

I wouldn't be against him going there if it benefited the player whilst also helping them, as such a petty minded 'screw ourselves if it helps screw them' attitude is what they're all about.  However, we'd be sending him somewhere where they WANT him to be shit, which would end up being counterproductive and he'd come back the same or a worse player for it.   
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pedro25 on January 13, 2012, 04:45:55 PM
He could come back a stronger character, and in some ways earn more admiration from AM for having the balls to go there.   
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 13, 2012, 04:50:04 PM
He could come back a stronger character, and in some ways earn more admiration from AM for having the balls to go there.   

I agree, if he was slightly older, but seeing as he is 20, he still is classed as young and it could affect him.  Who knows hey.  He might be a strong minded individual with a mature head and might not be fazed by abuse received from them (assuming he went there).  Whatever happens with Fonz, I hope he manages to find a club where he will be playing every week (preferably in the PL).
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: boboonthecorner on January 13, 2012, 05:32:04 PM
www.skysports.com

Alex McLeish has revealed that he is unlikely to add further players to his Aston Villa squad during January after the short-term signing of striker Robbie Keane from Los Angeles Galaxy.

The Scot admitted the only way he could add new signings to his squad was if players headed out of the club first.

Villa have had to lower their wage bill under McLeish after excessive spending over the past few years, but it has seen his squad weakened as more players have left the club than arrived.

And McLeish admitted: "It's a case of keeping and steering the ship in the right direction in terms of the wages.

"We have a clear vision through Randy Lerner (club owner) and Paul Faulkner (chief executive) that we have to manage the wages.

"We are still steering that course. There's no way we will add to the wages unless some of the wages are offloaded.

"I am not in any hurry to lose any of my players. Only if it was an attractive proposition would we do anything so it's very unlikely we would let any of our players go."

The Villa boss also insists there have been no approaches for James Collins despite speculation linking the defender with a move to QPR.

He said: "There's not been an approach as such. We hear there is interest for James and he should be proud of that. He should be proud he is a wanted man.

"But, saying that, he is an Aston Villa player. He has just moved into a new house so we would hope James is here for a long time to come."
Desperate

McLeish remains anxious ahead of the weekend clash at home to Everton and is hopeful that Keane can help inspire Villa to end a run of four successive home defeats.

He said: "Desperate is a word I don't like to use but the home form certainly is something we want to put right.

"We have lost to three of the elite clubs and Swansea beat us after we got a great result at Chelsea which was a real kick in the backside.

"It's up to us. I do feel we have been punished for every little mistake at home. But the one thing we have to concentrate on is concentration.

"I feel sometimes we can have little lapses and two against Swansea cost us two goals. We have to concentrate from start to finish as we did against Stoke, Arsenal and Chelsea."
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: boboonthecorner on January 13, 2012, 05:33:00 PM
Hardly surprising.

So having been shite all season the sum total of our January transfer window dealings is a veteran striker in the twilight of his career, for six games. We'll be behind QPR as well as Stoke come the end of the season.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: spangley1812 on January 13, 2012, 05:46:29 PM
Heard a whisper Mr Delfouneso is going to Small Heath after the weekend. Not happy if this happens anyone but them!!

Its unlikely as they couldnt afford to keep Chris Wood and they had to send him back..........but maybe the Fonz would be cheaper
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Jimmy Smash on January 13, 2012, 06:04:31 PM
Hardly surprising.

So having been shite all season the sum total of our January transfer window dealings is a veteran striker in the twilight of his career, for six games. We'll be behind QPR as well as Stoke come the end of the season.

To be fair no one is buying at the moment.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on January 13, 2012, 07:22:32 PM
So no-one else in? maybe he shouldn't have wasted 40k a week on a striker we don't need
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Vanilla on January 13, 2012, 08:04:10 PM
We've slipped a fair way in the last year or two, but we'd have to go on a slide of titanic proportions to get insecure enough to worry about helping them.


I heard we took a dodgy manager off their hands recently.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Villanation on January 13, 2012, 08:15:48 PM
Can't say what and where, so lets call this rumour, but its being suggested that Villa are in for Alex and have made an offer.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 13, 2012, 08:24:20 PM
I'd be surprised since Mcleish just said we probably aren't signing anyone and Alex will be on big wages.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Villanation on January 13, 2012, 08:26:29 PM
I'd be surprised since Mcleish just said we probably aren't signing anyone and Alex will be on big wages.

3 clubs in for him QPR and another one that has been suggested is the Villa.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Jimmy Smash on January 13, 2012, 08:53:31 PM
I'd be surprised since Mcleish just said we probably aren't signing anyone and Alex will be on big wages.

3 clubs in for him QPR and another one that has been suggested is the Villa.

"Suggested" is the key word in this post.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: gervilla on January 13, 2012, 09:33:21 PM
QPR can have  James Collins and we can take Alex, there you go, I think that's what you call an upgrade.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JJ-AV on January 13, 2012, 11:41:02 PM
I was playing 'fantasy manager' in my head, and I was thinking that the perception of Villa has taken such a hit that we'd struggle to get really good players in even if we did have money.

I mean, say Randy gave us £40m again. Would we be able to get a Bent type signing?

What players available this January could we get that would really improve us? Alex and Samba, certainly. Even those would come with massive wages that they're not worth.

Hoilett is a third, and if we had really big money to go on one player I'm sure Newcastle or Everton would sell us Cabaye and Baines if the money was right.

We really need to start looking abroad, IMO.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 13, 2012, 11:58:31 PM
I agree JJ.

Although the McLeish interview re no one else coming and Collins staying has frustrated me a little, mainly because the wages issues is there and an issue of course, if we are now into 1 in 1 out territory on wages, then surely knowing Heskey, Beye and Cuellar will be off the wages come the summer and we are still short IMO in the centre of the park, then I would hope if the opportunity to get another loan with a view to a long term deal, or a signing if one were to be available that fits the bill, we would take it. I would sooner see we have to trade to buy but we are actively scouting and looking and have targets in mind should there be an opportunity.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Clampy on January 14, 2012, 12:05:54 AM
My priority in the summer would be two new full backs, the ones we have now are just not good enough.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JJ-AV on January 14, 2012, 12:11:45 AM
Heskey, Beye and Cuellar won't be here.

Dunne, Collins and Warnock will only have 1 year left, so we will be able to sell them.

We will be left with a group of promising youngsters and 3 quality Premier League players in Given, Bent and Gabby.

If McLeish gets to next Summer with the slate that clean he will have a fantastic job and a great opportunity to rebuild from scratch. I very much doubt we will be scrapping around for loans then.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 14, 2012, 12:16:05 AM
We can hope.

Delph going back to Leeds on loan according to Lorimer from people on twitter. If so, it leaves us even lighter in the centre of midfield.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JJ-AV on January 14, 2012, 12:22:30 AM
We should be after a 'keeper. Guzan has stalled on his deal, and is on a free in the Summer.

With Given going straight back in tomorrow I imagine that'll confirm Guzan off in the Summer. With Shay's injury history we need a decent number 2.

Joe Lewis? Fraser Forster?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on January 14, 2012, 12:32:24 AM
We can hope.

Delph going back to Leeds on loan according to Lorimer from people on twitter. If so, it leaves us even lighter in the centre of midfield.


lets be honest we won't miss a terribly average midfielder even with our limited options
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on January 14, 2012, 12:44:31 AM
He's a good player. He just needs a run of games.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Summers on January 14, 2012, 12:54:18 AM
Alex would be a great signing, but he'll go to QPR.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on January 14, 2012, 12:54:45 AM
He's a good player. He just needs a run of games.

 I know you rate him Maz and its admirable the support you show all our younger players but to me anyway he's just an expensive osbourne and he'd had been out the door a while back if he hadn't cost 6m. Championship is about his level
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: spaf on January 14, 2012, 01:08:16 AM
How about Mohamed Kamara or Medo as he's also called. A 24-year-old defensive midfielder from Partizan. He's Athletic, but also good on the ball. Medo was immense when he still played in Finland and after a couple of seasons in Partizan he might be able to take the step up. This Sierra Leonean has also Finnish passport so work permit wouldn't be an issue. His agent claims Valencia, Athletico Madrid and Arsenal are looking at him and he also said Medo could be off for €3-4M. Now his salary is only $200k per year. Worth a pop surely. 
 

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 14, 2012, 08:39:01 AM
We should be after a 'keeper. Guzan has stalled on his deal, and is on a free in the Summer.

With Given going straight back in tomorrow I imagine that'll confirm Guzan off in the Summer. With Shay's injury history we need a decent number 2.

Joe Lewis? Fraser Forster?

I think it is poorly managed and Guzan is a damned good number 2.

Re Delph, I actually think he might need to change position. He goes missing a lot, but I think he could make a super left back.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: LeeB on January 14, 2012, 08:51:06 AM
We should be after a 'keeper. Guzan has stalled on his deal, and is on a free in the Summer.

With Given going straight back in tomorrow I imagine that'll confirm Guzan off in the Summer. With Shay's injury history we need a decent number 2.

Joe Lewis? Fraser Forster?

I think it is poorly managed and Guzan is a damned good number 2.

Re Delph, I actually think he might need to change position. He goes missing a lot, but I think he could make a super left back.

I agree ozzjim, I thought his performance there against Citeh in the cup last season showed great promise, and we're not exactly stocked with quality back there.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Shrek on January 14, 2012, 09:20:00 AM
I really like Delph, I think he could be Abit like Bale. No one was sure of him, he wasn't playing well after moving up to the prem, then it just suddenly clicked and he has t looked back.

I'd love either Samba or Alex aswell.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: john e on January 14, 2012, 09:39:12 AM
I really like Delph, I think he could be Abit like Bale. No one was sure of him, he wasn't playing well after moving up to the prem, then it just suddenly clicked and he has t looked back.

I'd love either Samba or Alex aswell.


i thought Samba was 15mill, cant see us paying that
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: stubbsyandy on January 14, 2012, 09:46:12 AM
The more I think about Delph at left back the more I like it as it would give us great attacking options. My reservation is his tackling, but at left back he would be more disciplined and not be out of position, which is why he tends to lunge in when playing in midfield.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rigadon on January 14, 2012, 09:56:30 AM
The problem with Delph appears to be that he is a a bit of a jack of all trades.  I do think there's a player there, but he needs to make a position his own.  Left back?  Not for me.   

A problem for him is that Clark has come in and has given the midfield more balance so I can't see him getting too many more run outs in central midfield.  Maybe once Petrov retires Delph and Clark could be a midfield pairing for the future? 

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Irish villain on January 14, 2012, 10:37:58 AM
This is the most low key transfer window for villa since about 2006. How many links have actually been discussed on this thread?! It's mostly to do with players we already have, players we'd like to be linked with and the Robbie Keane deal.

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: WALTERS WARRIORS on January 14, 2012, 10:42:34 AM
Been disappointed with Delph. But do think he has something. I think he would be better as an attacking midfielder where he is limited in his tackling duties as he has great pace and can go around a player. He needs to be more comfortable on the ball as he does have a great pass and vision in his tool box ......
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: richard moore on January 14, 2012, 10:54:53 AM
This is the most low key transfer window for villa since about 2006. How many links have actually been discussed on this thread?! It's mostly to do with players we already have, players we'd like to be linked with and the Robbie Keane deal.



Ditto many many other clubs - combination of lack of money and very little talent around worth poaching...home or abroad. There is nowhere near the quality or quantity there used to be. You only have to look at the orgasm inducing glee of Stoke fans in the last window when they signed.......wait for it.......Peter Crouch and Wilson Palacios to see how dumbed down most people's expectations have become
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Chris Smith on January 14, 2012, 11:29:33 AM
That's such a patronising attitude, Richard. For Stoke who have only been in the PL a short time those are significant signings. They've built themselves a strong squad and while I hate watching them you have to admire the way they have kept improving.

The January window is usually fairly slow, clubs don't really want to sell so it makes trading very difficult.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dave on January 14, 2012, 11:31:49 AM
You only have to look at the orgasm inducing glee of Stoke fans in the last window when they signed.......wait for it.......Peter Crouch and Wilson Palacios to see how dumbed down most people's expectations have become
No, Stoke signed possibly two of the biggest names in their history. That has nothing to do with anybody else. If I were a Stoke fan, I'd probably be excited by that as well.

As for 'very little' talent worth getting from abroad, according to whom? Tell us what you know of the Dutch, Swiss, French, Portuguese and Belgian leagues to come to that conclusion?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: brontebilly on January 14, 2012, 12:34:38 PM
The problem with Delph appears to be that he is a a bit of a jack of all trades.  I do think there's a player there, but he needs to make a position his own.  Left back?  Not for me.   

A problem for him is that Clark has come in and has given the midfield more balance so I can't see him getting too many more run outs in central midfield.  Maybe once Petrov retires Delph and Clark could be a midfield pairing for the future?

Nah they are both left sided. Agreed on the shouts for Delph at left back. Couldnt be any worse than Warnock anyway but its make or break time for him really at Villa. I think there is a player in there somewhere but obviously his confidence is low at the moment. Loan might be the job for him.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 14, 2012, 12:35:20 PM
Stoke did something a lot of clubs make a mistake in not doing. Stoke looked at what works and rather than trying to play a different way, just bought better quality players to play in the same manner. Too many teams try and change what they do best, Stoke didn't and don't.

On a footballing basis however, I am always hoping they lose, and end up in some sort of oblivion with Pulis locked away for crimes against the beautiful game.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 14, 2012, 12:36:47 PM
I think Delph would benefit from a loan, there's a technically very good footballer in there and I  think he needs his confidence up again.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: richard moore on January 14, 2012, 12:44:43 PM
You only have to look at the orgasm inducing glee of Stoke fans in the last window when they signed.......wait for it.......Peter Crouch and Wilson Palacios to see how dumbed down most people's expectations have become
No, Stoke signed possibly two of the biggest names in their history. That has nothing to do with anybody else. If I were a Stoke fan, I'd probably be excited by that as well.

As for 'very little' talent worth getting from abroad, according to whom? Tell us what you know of the Dutch, Swiss, French, Portuguese and Belgian leagues to come to that conclusion?

Dave, your reply made me laugh. Thanks for warming me up inside, it's such a cold day down here. I must apologise, you are right, those leagues are choc full of talent and I should know better as I indeed don't know much about the Swiss or Belgian leagues. And as a Stoke fan, you are right again, I would be over the moon at signing Palacios and Crouch...
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: richard moore on January 14, 2012, 12:48:03 PM
That's such a patronising attitude, Richard. For Stoke who have only been in the PL a short time those are significant signings. They've built themselves a strong squad and while I hate watching them you have to admire the way they have kept improving.

The January window is usually fairly slow, clubs don't really want to sell so it makes trading very difficult.

You are right Chris as ever, I admire Stoke for the way they keep improving, in fact I admire them in almost every way possible. I am sure you are right too, this January window will end up being a real corker, lots and lots of activity by the end of it. In fact, it could be one of the busiest ever now that you have made me think more clearly about it. There is so much quality out there, I can't understand why it is so slow really
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Chris Smith on January 14, 2012, 12:49:12 PM
It comes as little surprise that you would enjoy smugly patronising smaller clubs.

Edit: that was in response to your original reply where you claimed to enjoy being patronising but subsequently deleted through not having the courage of your convictions.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: richard moore on January 14, 2012, 12:51:44 PM
It comes as little surprise that you would enjoy smugly patronising smaller clubs.
It comes as little surprise that you would enjoy smugly patronising smaller clubs.


You are right Chris, as ever
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 14, 2012, 12:51:47 PM
I was playing 'fantasy manager' in my head, and I was thinking that the perception of Villa has taken such a hit that we'd struggle to get really good players in even if we did have money.

I mean, say Randy gave us £40m again. Would we be able to get a Bent type signing?

What players available this January could we get that would really improve us? Alex and Samba, certainly. Even those would come with massive wages that they're not worth.

Hoilett is a third, and if we had really big money to go on one player I'm sure Newcastle or Everton would sell us Cabaye and Baines if the money was right.

We really need to start looking abroad, IMO.

I agree looking abroad is where we can get real quality and value for money. It's the way forward under the financial constraints we are under.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Summers on January 14, 2012, 12:52:19 PM
As a Villa fan, I'd have been thrilled at signing Palacios. He'd have improved our midfield.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: richard moore on January 14, 2012, 12:54:36 PM
It comes as little surprise that you would enjoy smugly patronising smaller clubs.

Edit: that was in response to your original reply where you cleaned to enjoy being patronising but subsequently deleted through not having the courage of your convictions.
It comes as little surprise that you would enjoy smugly patronising smaller clubs.

Edit: that was in response to your original reply where you claimed to enjoy being patronising but subsequently deleted through not having the courage of your convictions.


Of course, I must apologise for changing my post. You are right Chris, I did not have the courage of my convictions
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Chris Smith on January 14, 2012, 12:55:58 PM
It comes as little surprise that you would enjoy smugly patronising smaller clubs.
It comes as little surprise that you would enjoy smugly patronising smaller clubs.


You are right Chris, as ever

We both know that I am.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: richard moore on January 14, 2012, 12:59:18 PM
It comes as little surprise that you would enjoy smugly patronising smaller clubs.
It comes as little surprise that you would enjoy smugly patronising smaller clubs.


You are right Chris, as ever

We both know that I am.

We all know you are right. I can only apologise again for being so smugly patronising. I shall try to be less so in the future
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: eamonn on January 14, 2012, 01:01:00 PM
You have to admit richard, you do grumble quite a lot about the lack of quality in football today.

Solely watching Barcelona might be the only way to get your love back for the game though even then I'm sure you'll have some reservations!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: richard moore on January 14, 2012, 01:02:48 PM
You have to admit richard, you do grumble quite a lot about the lack of quality in football today.

Solely watching Barcelona might be the only way to get your love back for the game though even then I'm sure you'll have some reservations!


I must apologise in that case to you as well Eammon, I am sorry for being that way
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: brontebilly on January 14, 2012, 02:48:27 PM
As a Villa fan, I'd have been thrilled at signing Palacios. He'd have improved our midfield.

he hasnt exactly thrived at Stoke this season. Felt Clark bullied their midfield in Stoke recently.

We badly need a new left back though. if not in January then the summer. Would be great if Delph or Stevens comes through there but likely we will have to go into the market to replace Warnock.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 14, 2012, 10:16:55 PM
Can we get back on to no transfers for Villa please, and accept that discussing Stoke is as interesting as the football they erm... play?

Eck said no more again after the game tonight, my heart sank. A left back and a central midfield player are badly needed, as shown again today.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Duncan Shaw on January 15, 2012, 09:19:15 AM
Acording to the Sunday Express this morning (from the Beeb, I don't buy the rag!) we tried to temot Liverpol with a deal for Carroll involving Bent!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: phantom limb on January 15, 2012, 09:32:02 AM
Acording to the Sunday Express this morning (from the Beeb, I don't buy the rag!) we tried to temot Liverpol with a deal for Carroll involving Bent!
I read that this morning and that would just be silly. So much so that I don't believe it one bit!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Slaphead on January 15, 2012, 09:46:19 AM
Acording to the Sunday Express this morning (from the Beeb, I don't buy the rag!) we tried to temot Liverpol with a deal for Carroll involving Bent!
I read that this morning and that would just be silly. So much so that I don't believe it one bit!

My scouse mate has just text me this, I would flip if this happened.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithe on January 15, 2012, 09:49:47 AM
I could see LFC instigating this deal but to think Villa would 'tempt' them with a deal involving Bent would seem as inviting as being 'tempted' to see how far you could lower your knackers into a threshing machine.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Irish villain on January 15, 2012, 10:18:25 AM
That Bent story must be bollocks, surely?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on January 15, 2012, 11:56:42 AM
just journo's covering their tracks because they were so off the mark. They started the Bent to Liverpool rumour, AM tells them Dalglish doesn't want him, so now its us who instigated it. Certainly wasn't because it was a complete non-story in the first place.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: old man villa fan on January 15, 2012, 12:14:09 PM
Why is it that anything between Villa and Liverpool seems to hit the press before any official contact between the clubs.  Also, it makes the headlines and is not just amongst all the rest of the transfer rumours.  We do not seem to have the same problem with other clubs.

I used to admire Liverpool as a club in the 70s and 80s when they were a great team but now they have sunk so low in my estimation for the way they run their club that I want any team that plays them to beat them and that would even extend to our friends down the road.  Liverpool bring football into disrepute.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: DB on January 15, 2012, 12:17:17 PM
Oh no, of course its true, every story you see in the gossip columns is, didn't you know that?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TheSandman on January 15, 2012, 02:35:40 PM
Why is it that anything between Villa and Liverpool seems to hit the press before any official contact between the clubs.  Also, it makes the headlines and is not just amongst all the rest of the transfer rumours.  We do not seem to have the same problem with other clubs.

I used to admire Liverpool as a club in the 70s and 80s when they were a great team but now they have sunk so low in my estimation for the way they run their club that I want any team that plays them to beat them and that would even extend to our friends down the road.  Liverpool bring football into disrepute.

I agree OMVF. I'm starting to hope that the club, their overrated, whining, racist fans, their c*** of a manager and players like Gerrard, Downing, Carragher and Suarez (to a man prize c***s) will be sucked down a black hole. Hopefully some time soon.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on January 15, 2012, 02:45:29 PM
Why is it that anything between Villa and Liverpool seems to hit the press before any official contact between the clubs.  Also, it makes the headlines and is not just amongst all the rest of the transfer rumours.  We do not seem to have the same problem with other clubs.

I used to admire Liverpool as a club in the 70s and 80s when they were a great team but now they have sunk so low in my estimation for the way they run their club that I want any team that plays them to beat them and that would even extend to our friends down the road.  Liverpool bring football into disrepute.

I agree OMVF. I'm starting to hope that the club, their overrated, whining, racist fans, their c*** of a manager and players like Gerrard, Downing, Carragher and Suarez (to a man prize c***s) will be sucked down a black hole. Hopefully some time soon.

You've both nailed it there. I really Man City put out a full side in the second leg of the Carling and batter them. The thought of Liverpool lifting silverware turns my stomach. King Kenny my fucking bollocks he is.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: mattjpa on January 15, 2012, 02:45:45 PM
I've hated the scouse more than blues since the Gareth Barry debacle. And kenny dalgleish is the biggest jerk in the pl. every interview he gives makes me hate him more
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 15, 2012, 03:57:06 PM
The media is turning on the hobbited one. Their handling of the Saurez thing was completely unacceptable, and has removed an awful lot of credibility, and the truth is Dalglish has spent vast sums on top 6 not top 2 quality.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: James on January 15, 2012, 08:08:44 PM
I've hated Liverpool since the seventies, but that's a different story, anyway...

...QPR looking at Ireland apparently, not the country that is, but our player!

(Read it on Sporting Life somewhere.)
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 15, 2012, 08:10:29 PM
I hope we don't sell Ireland.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Pete3206 on January 15, 2012, 08:12:01 PM
QPR will be linked with about 150 players before the end of the month.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Shrek on January 15, 2012, 08:13:00 PM
I hope we don't sell Ireland.

An me. Who would have thought that a month ago?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TheSandman on January 15, 2012, 08:15:00 PM
I wouldn't be surprised if QPR want him as Hughes is the only man who seems to have got some consistent form out of him. Whether we will sell I do not know.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dave on January 15, 2012, 08:19:40 PM
Then again, he didn't seem to show much interest in signing him for Fulham. Even on loan when we we virtually dragging him to the door.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on January 15, 2012, 09:11:06 PM
different finances. Fulham could never afforded him. You only have to look at Alex. He must be on a fair whack at chelsea
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Villanation on January 15, 2012, 09:14:44 PM
I hope we don't sell Ireland.

An me. Who would have thought that a month ago?


If we sell Ireland when finally we are getting something back from him, and it looks pretty good to me, then we are stark raving mad.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Clampy on January 15, 2012, 09:17:58 PM
When i heard Hughes had taken over at QPR, i did think that he might be interested in Ireland, and if i can think that than i'm sure some piss poor journalists could as well.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dave on January 15, 2012, 09:28:32 PM
different finances. Fulham could never afforded him. You only have to look at Alex. He must be on a fair whack at chelsea
We were still paying most of his wages when he was up at Newcastle.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Matt C on January 15, 2012, 09:47:23 PM
Enjoyed watching Ireland yesterday, thought he was the best player on the pitch.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: tarzansbrother on January 15, 2012, 09:52:57 PM
Enjoyed watching Ireland yesterday, thought he was the best player on the pitch.

He was the only bright spot, I also feel he would link better with Nzogbia than Albrighton.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 15, 2012, 10:02:23 PM
I think all 3 would link well behind Bent, who would be more alive as we saw when we started playing football yesterday.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Hoppo on January 15, 2012, 10:39:48 PM
I hope we do sell Ireland still an over rated over paid prick..
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SashasGrandad on January 15, 2012, 10:44:37 PM
Enjoyed watching Ireland yesterday, thought he was the best player on the pitch.

He looked good in patches but he never created anything worthwhile - never has. I'd get rid of him if we got a decent offer and get someone better in.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: gervilla on January 15, 2012, 10:44:59 PM
I hope we do sell Ireland still an over rated over paid prick..

Have you watched many Villa games lately ?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Lobsterboy on January 15, 2012, 11:37:41 PM
Enjoyed watching Ireland yesterday, thought he was the best player on the pitch.

He looked good in patches but he never created anything worthwhile - never has. I'd get rid of him if we got a decent offer and get someone better in.

I take it by 'never created anything worthwhile' you are talking apart from Bent's goal... and I presume he won MOTM by doing nothing too?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on January 15, 2012, 11:53:17 PM
Trouble is he's as mad as a box of frogs and while everyone deserves a 2nd chance or 5th or 6th in his case, you do wonder what he's gonna do next. If and its a big IF we could get back all the money we paid and AM was allowed to spend the full amount i'd be tempted. If not we'd be better hoping he keeps improving and turns into the player he was at Citeh for a while. Rather a high-wire act though and you wouldn't bet against him throwing it all down the drain again.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: VillaSpen on January 16, 2012, 03:11:22 AM
Surely I can't be the only cynical old sod that is less than amazed at Ireland's inclusion and form considering the transfer window is open? I couldn't agree more that he's finally showing some ability but I fear it'll be back to normal on February 1st.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: paul_e on January 16, 2012, 08:49:38 AM
Enjoyed watching Ireland yesterday, thought he was the best player on the pitch.

He looked good in patches but he never created anything worthwhile - never has. I'd get rid of him if we got a decent offer and get someone better in.

I take it by 'never created anything worthwhile' you are talking apart from Bent's goal... and I presume he won MOTM by doing nothing too?

I kinda agree with sashasgrandad here.  He did play a role in the build up to the goal but it was very much a team goal.  However other than that I can't think of any chances that came from him.  I said the same against Bristol Rovers, at the moment he's doing  ok but nothing more than that(there are flashes of brilliance but nothing is coming from them, this is a fault of the team as much as him though), it's just that we'd gotten so used to abject lazy performances that any improvement seems huge.

I think the best thing to do is compare him to Ashley Young.  Even on a bad day you could see Young creating a chance or 2.  On good days he completely bossed the game.  I'm yet to see Ireland match bad day Young let alone dominate a game.

I wouldn't sell him though.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: nick harper on January 16, 2012, 09:33:01 AM
Great, our most gifted player is finally beginning to feel part of the club and getting good vibes from the fans and people want to sell him. If only McLeish could train the team to move off the ball, Ireland might find the gaps to open sides up.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 16, 2012, 09:39:25 AM
Great, our most gifted player is finally beginning to feel part of the club and getting good vibes from the fans and people want to sell him. If only McLeish could train the team to move off the ball, Ireland might find the gaps to open sides up.

I couldn't agree more about the movement issue, but with Ireland I can't help feeling this is the oasis in the desert that has been his Aston Villa career.  While he's playing well, we play him without question, however if we get the opportunity to get some money back and clear his wages off the wagebill, then I fear turning it down could prove to be a missed opportunity.

Time will tell.   
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dave Clark Five on January 16, 2012, 09:44:34 AM
Great, our most gifted player is finally beginning to feel part of the club and getting good vibes from the fans and people want to sell him. If only McLeish could train the team to move off the ball, Ireland might find the gaps to open sides up.

You wouldn't think that any player who has got through the minefield of a route to becoming a professional footballer would need training to move off the ball. It is all about confidence in my opinion. I would expect seasoned players to try to instil this confidence into the younger ones.

Regarding Ireland, he is a different player now and I want to see him stay and help us develop a midfield that is probably the least established in the whole league. I can understand the cynicism that some have with Ireland but you sometimes have to hang on to what crumbs of hope you have got. Lerner may want to offload before he spends any more. He needs to find replacements before he does this, not flog them now and try to bluff it out until August.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Matt C on January 16, 2012, 09:48:09 AM
Confidence seems a particuarly big thing with Ireland - like I said, thought he had a decent game on Saturday but once he crossed for the goal you saw him visibly change, the fans gave him some encouragement and he was at the centre of our good 15 minute spell.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: N'ZMAV on January 16, 2012, 09:57:57 AM
I've got a sneaky feeling if we had a decent couple of years out of Ireland that Fergie would take him to United.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Merv on January 16, 2012, 10:11:13 AM
Great, our most gifted player is finally beginning to feel part of the club and getting good vibes from the fans and people want to sell him. If only McLeish could train the team to move off the ball, Ireland might find the gaps to open sides up.

I agree. He's been a write off for 18 months but now he's fit he's getting the opportunity to play, and he's beginning to show glimpses of what he can do. Our options are pretty limited in midfield as it is (which is why I'm against Delph being moved on loan) and, if he's playing well, Ireland must stay. He's just about the only midfield player we have who is neither young and inexperienced (Herd, Clark) or entering the final phase of his career (Petrov). He's 25/26, should be entering into his prime - be nice if that prime is with us.

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Le Lapin on January 16, 2012, 10:23:15 AM
I hope we do sell Ireland still an over rated over paid prick..
You shouldn't bottle things up...tell us what you really think.
By the way I think you are wrong on two points. He's not over rated. And we shouldn't sell one of the few players that has a bit of vision in our team.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Shrek on January 16, 2012, 10:39:01 AM
This is Ireland's first run in the team and he looks by far our best player, he has connected with the fans and looks better for it.

I hope we keep him because him and N'Zogbia are going to be quality together.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 16, 2012, 11:00:46 AM
Looks like Delph could be heading back to leeds on loan.  Good move for him I think
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 16, 2012, 11:14:49 AM
I've been disappointed by Delph this season, but a loan may help him. 
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dave Clark Five on January 16, 2012, 11:23:00 AM
Aston Villa are considering a loan move for Slovenia midfielder Armin Bacinovic, who plays for Italian club Palermo.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: nick harper on January 16, 2012, 12:26:39 PM
Aston Villa are considering a loan move for Slovenia midfielder Armin Bacinovic, who plays for Italian club Palermo.


Never heard of him but maybe Delph going out gives him the opportunity to bring a bit more experience into midfield. It's a faint hope but please let him be an energetic box to box midfielder a la Milner.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: James on January 16, 2012, 12:43:54 PM
Aston Villa are considering a loan move for Slovenia midfielder Armin Bacinovic, who plays for Italian club Palermo.

It would have made more sense to keep and play Makoun rather than loan him out to justify loaning someone else in! Farcical, to say the least, but then that's what Villa are becoming/have become these days! Shameful.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 16, 2012, 12:50:25 PM
Or, if Makoun wasn't going to have any impact for us and the loan signing does, a very good move.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulTheVillan on January 16, 2012, 01:09:49 PM
Sali Salifou
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 16, 2012, 01:36:51 PM
It's been said before but Makoun was never ever given enough of a chance. 7 games in a completely new league in a struggling side, was never going to be enough.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mellin on January 16, 2012, 01:56:06 PM
Indeed. He may well have ended up not being good enough, but at this stage none of us, including the management, are in a position to judge with certainty.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Chris Smith on January 16, 2012, 02:00:05 PM
Aston Villa are considering a loan move for Slovenia midfielder Armin Bacinovic, who plays for Italian club Palermo.

It would have made more sense to keep and play Makoun rather than loan him out to justify loaning someone else in! Farcical, to say the least, but then that's what Villa are becoming/have become these days! Shameful.

Shameful? That a manager didn't particularly rate a player? Get a grip.

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 16, 2012, 02:06:30 PM
Aston Villa are considering a loan move for Slovenia midfielder Armin Bacinovic, who plays for Italian club Palermo.

It would have made more sense to keep and play Makoun rather than loan him out to justify loaning someone else in! Farcical, to say the least, but then that's what Villa are becoming/have become these days! Shameful.

Shameful? That a manager didn't particularly rate a player? Get a grip.

The manager didnt rate a player who could make forward passes so decided to loan him out and then sign sicknote Jenas who hasn't been playing regular first team football for ages - now thats shameful!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 16, 2012, 02:08:45 PM
Indeed. He may well have ended up not being good enough, but at this stage none of us, including the management, are in a position to judge with certainty.

The managers (three of them, if you include Garry Mac) also saw him in training and between them decided he was only worth 7 games.  I'm guessing he simply wasn't/isn't suited to the PL.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Chris Smith on January 16, 2012, 02:12:22 PM
I watched Makoun at Derby and I don't think he ade single forward pass all night. He's a neat, tidy player but really all he does is keep the ball moving, he offers very little creativity, doesn't run and can't tackle.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on January 16, 2012, 02:34:14 PM
Aston Villa are considering a loan move for Slovenia midfielder Armin Bacinovic, who plays for Italian club Palermo.

It would have made more sense to keep and play Makoun rather than loan him out to justify loaning someone else in! Farcical, to say the least, but then that's what Villa are becoming/have become these days! Shameful.

Shameful? That a manager didn't particularly rate a player? Get a grip.



Ooooh.....it's so dramatic to put shameful on there isn't it? Shameful is when a 13 year mugs a 65 year old lady in the street. It isn't when a manager doesn't really rate a player and send him out on loan.

For what it's worth, had Houllier stayed and he was given the money, I think he'd have bought players to make full use of Makoun. On his own, with the players we have now, Makoun would have been exposed.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mellin on January 16, 2012, 02:42:09 PM
Indeed. He may well have ended up not being good enough, but at this stage none of us, including the management, are in a position to judge with certainty.

The managers (three of them, if you include Garry Mac) also saw him in training and between them decided he was only worth 7 games.  I'm guessing he simply wasn't/isn't suited to the PL.

You've missed my point. At the time he wasn't worth more than seven games (only two decided that), but if given further time to acclimatise he may well have been. Noone knows how they'll turn out without the player being given a real opportunity. Not even a manager who's more qualified than I to make a judgement. Six months isn't enough for a foreign import to show their worth and the Premier League's history is littered with players who having been excellent elsewhere, initially struggled, only to go on and perform after a year or so. Pires is a good example.

We'd spent the money and it was worth giving him this season.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pedro25 on January 16, 2012, 02:50:19 PM
Makoun was woeful v Hereford, I think that was the night McLeish made up his mind.  During the summer I thought Makoun and Delph would be our central pairing this season, now they are probably 7th and 8th in the pecking order for a starting berth in central midfield behind Petrov, Clark, Herd, Bannan, Ireland and Gardner.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Monty on January 16, 2012, 02:52:54 PM
Makoun was woeful v Hereford

But also very good against Man Utd at Old Trafford.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 16, 2012, 02:55:24 PM
I think Mellin is right.  Some foreign players need game time to get used to the pace and physicality of the PL.  Makoun needed more time and I think he would have turned into a very good player for us.  Could he have been worse than any of the CM's we currently have ?  Who knows but without being given a proper chance then we will never know.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 16, 2012, 02:55:55 PM
Indeed. He may well have ended up not being good enough, but at this stage none of us, including the management, are in a position to judge with certainty.

The managers (three of them, if you include Garry Mac) also saw him in training and between them decided he was only worth 7 games.  I'm guessing he simply wasn't/isn't suited to the PL.

You've missed my point. At the time he wasn't worth more than seven games (only two decided that), but if given further time to acclimatise he may well have been. Noone knows how they'll turn out without the player being given a real opportunity. Not even a manager who's more qualified than I to make a judgement. Six months isn't enough for a foreign import to show their worth and the Premier League's history is littered with players who having been excellent elsewhere, initially struggled, only to go on and perform after a year or so. Pires is a good example.

We'd spent the money and it was worth giving him this season.

I get your point, I just don't agree with it.

If you're out of the team the way you get back into it is by impressing in training and my assumption is that Makoun did not do this, hence hasn't been given the chance you suggest he should have had.  If others were doing better in the training, such as Herd, then he was rightly given a start ahead of Makoun.  It's OK to mention other players who take time to settle, but if in the manager's judgement that isn't going to happen, based on what he sees from (and admittedly limted number of) first team appearances and during training, then he's right not to play him and try to move him on.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Matt C on January 16, 2012, 03:04:31 PM
I think the problem with Makoun is he didn't settle in a personal sense and failed to intergrate with the rest of the group - I imagine he was even further isolated when Houllier, his coaches and Pires all left too.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Vanilla on January 16, 2012, 04:33:50 PM
Indeed. He may well have ended up not being good enough, but at this stage none of us, including the management, are in a position to judge with certainty.

The managers (three of them, if you include Garry Mac) also saw him in training and between them decided he was only worth 7 games.  I'm guessing he simply wasn't/isn't suited to the PL.

You've missed my point. At the time he wasn't worth more than seven games (only two decided that), but if given further time to acclimatise he may well have been. Noone knows how they'll turn out without the player being given a real opportunity. Not even a manager who's more qualified than I to make a judgement. Six months isn't enough for a foreign import to show their worth and the Premier League's history is littered with players who having been excellent elsewhere, initially struggled, only to go on and perform after a year or so. Pires is a good example.

We'd spent the money and it was worth giving him this season.

I get your point, I just don't agree with it.

If you're out of the team the way you get back into it is by impressing in training and my assumption is that Makoun did not do this, hence hasn't been given the chance you suggest he should have had.  If others were doing better in the training, such as Herd, then he was rightly given a start ahead of Makoun.  It's OK to mention other players who take time to settle, but if in the manager's judgement that isn't going to happen, based on what he sees from (and admittedly limted number of) first team appearances and during training, then he's right not to play him and try to move him on.

I think squad numbers and the subjective slant of a manager also plays a part in a player succeeding or not. Would Petrov have had so long to settle if it weren't for the persistence of MON? Managers just take to certain players and dismiss other ones. That's why the current manager has brought in two players he wanted whilst at the Blues.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 16, 2012, 04:50:05 PM
Delph has now been linked to West Ham.  I still think he will go back to leeds
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 16, 2012, 04:53:56 PM
I think squad numbers and the subjective slant of a manager also plays a part in a player succeeding or not. Would Petrov have had so long to settle if it weren't for the persistence of MON? Managers just take to certain players and dismiss other ones. That's why the current manager has brought in two players he wanted whilst at the Blues.

MON did give Petrov plenty of time, but back then there was very little competition for his place.  With Makoun, you've got Petrov, Ireland, Herd, Delph and Clark, plus NRC last season, meaning he had to do more to stay in the team. 
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Vanilla on January 16, 2012, 05:02:27 PM
I think squad numbers and the subjective slant of a manager also plays a part in a player succeeding or not. Would Petrov have had so long to settle if it weren't for the persistence of MON? Managers just take to certain players and dismiss other ones. That's why the current manager has brought in two players he wanted whilst at the Blues.

MON did give Petrov plenty of time, but back then there was very little competition for his place.  With Makoun, you've got Petrov, Ireland, Herd, Delph and Clark, plus NRC last season, meaning he had to do more to stay in the team.

True, but this season we have played Heskey, Gabby and Hutton in midfield positions, meaning our midfield hasn't been bursting with viable options. Even when one comes good, i.e. Ireland, N'zogbia seems to disappear. And the less said about the Jenas signing the better.

 
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: eastie on January 16, 2012, 05:23:03 PM
Collins plus cash in exchange for Scott dann is being mooted on sky- id take that , dann is a decent defender , do not rule out Craig Gardner returning to the club in a swap deal involving petrov or Delph Plus cash!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 16, 2012, 06:00:23 PM
Collins plus cash in exchange for Scott dann is being mooted on sky- id take that , dann is a decent defender , do not rule out Craig Gardner returning to the club in a swap deal involving petrov or Delph Plus cash!

You're even starting to sound like him now, Eastie.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Confusious says on January 16, 2012, 06:06:26 PM
Anyone heard about the supposed swop of Bent for Carrol, instigated by Villa

apparently, Downing would be pleased.  I hope this is just rumour but who knows!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dave Clark Five on January 16, 2012, 06:27:37 PM
&feature=youtube_gdata_player
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SashasGrandad on January 16, 2012, 06:29:33 PM
Anyone heard about the supposed swop of Bent for Carrol, instigated by Villa

apparently, Downing would be pleased.  I hope this is just rumour but who knows!

Why not throw in Heskey as well!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Irish villain on January 16, 2012, 06:57:12 PM
Delph has now been linked to West Ham.  I still think he will go back to leeds

I can't see him ever making it in the premiership. Our midfield has been decimated in recent seasons, we have no stand-out first choice midfield and he has failed utterly to impress when given a run in the side.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: tepavilla on January 16, 2012, 06:57:42 PM
Anyone heard about the supposed swop of Bent for Carrol, instigated by Villa

apparently, Downing would be pleased.  I hope this is just rumour but who knows!

Why not throw in Heskey as well!
In that scenario we'd probably have to throw in some extra money as well
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Irish villain on January 16, 2012, 07:02:49 PM
Anyone heard about the supposed swop of Bent for Carrol, instigated by Villa

apparently, Downing would be pleased.  I hope this is just rumour but who knows!

Why not throw in Heskey as well!
Collins plus cash in exchange for Scott dann is being mooted on sky- id take that , dann is a decent defender , do not rule out Craig Gardner returning to the club in a swap deal involving petrov or Delph Plus cash!

That would be a good deal. So long as Dann passed a medical. He's hardly injury prone is he?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dante Lavelli on January 16, 2012, 07:14:35 PM
A swap between Collins and Dann would be a great move.  I don't think Dann is significantly better I just think that breaking up the Collins/Dunne partnership will shake the defence up a bit, forcing the whole unit to concentrate and communicate better.

He's also likely to be a "McLeish" man, whereas I fear Collins and Dunne pretty much do as they please.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TheSandman on January 16, 2012, 07:58:36 PM
I don't think Blackburn will sell Dann AND Samba this month and Samba has issued a transfer request so I don't think this will be a goer.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: spangley1812 on January 16, 2012, 08:03:19 PM
I don't think Blackburn will sell Dann AND Samba this month and Samba has issued a transfer request so I don't think this will be a goer.

Physioroom.com has Dann as "doubtfull" to return on 21/01/12 so he may not pass a medical anyway
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on January 16, 2012, 08:07:21 PM
I thought that was a bit of an optimistic timescale for someone who's split a ballbag. For something like that i'd need counselling, its bad enough thinking of it happening to someone else
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 16, 2012, 08:09:16 PM
I don't think Blackburn will sell Dann AND Samba this month and Samba has issued a transfer request so I don't think this will be a goer.

I agree, I'd like it to happen but another thing is why would Collins want to go there?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithe on January 16, 2012, 08:09:52 PM
I thought that was a bit of an optimistic timescale for someone who's split a ballbag. For something like that i'd need counselling, its bad enough thinking of it happening to someone else

I'd not idea what you were talking about so googled, kind of wished I hadn't now.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on January 16, 2012, 08:16:59 PM
aye. makes your own ache in sympathy.  If he joined us you'd have male Villa fan with their legs crossed everytime his leg went above waist height. For that reason alone its a no from me.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: old man villa fan on January 16, 2012, 08:31:27 PM
Indeed. He may well have ended up not being good enough, but at this stage none of us, including the management, are in a position to judge with certainty.

The managers (three of them, if you include Garry Mac) also saw him in training and between them decided he was only worth 7 games.  I'm guessing he simply wasn't/isn't suited to the PL.

Didn't he miss 2 games after being sent off against Blackpool, came back for a couple of games and then was injured and was out for a few of games.  By the time he was fit the midfield was settled.

It looks as though he could have only played another 3 or 4 matches on top of his 7 anyway.  Whether it suited the player to move on, I do not know but I think we were very hasty in coming to a conclusion on his worth to the team.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 16, 2012, 08:36:06 PM
I don't think Blackburn will sell Dann AND Samba this month and Samba has issued a transfer request so I don't think this will be a goer.

Physioroom.com has Dann as "doubtfull" to return on 21/01/12 so he may not pass a medical anyway


You don't have to be fit to play to pass a medical.

A condition that will clear up (like, say, an exploded testicle) wouldn't be cause to fail a medical.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: spangley1812 on January 16, 2012, 08:39:25 PM
I don't think Blackburn will sell Dann AND Samba this month and Samba has issued a transfer request so I don't think this will be a goer.

Physioroom.com has Dann as "doubtfull" to return on 21/01/12 so he may not pass a medical anyway


You don't have to be fit to play to pass a medical.

A condition that will clear up (like, say, an exploded testicle) wouldn't be cause to fail a medical.

So on a medical are they looking for long term possible injuries and do scans on other stuff
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on January 16, 2012, 08:43:49 PM
yep. when you think about it we bought a crock like Downing and Ireland has that osgood slatter disease. Obviously our medicals just check they're breathing.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Marlon From Bearwood on January 16, 2012, 08:56:56 PM
I don't think Blackburn will sell Dann AND Samba this month and Samba has issued a transfer request so I don't think this will be a goer.

I was convinced we'd never sell A. Young AND Downing in the same transfer window so you never know.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: hawkeye on January 16, 2012, 09:00:16 PM
 Dann for Collins great business, it wont happen
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithe on January 16, 2012, 09:05:34 PM
Didn't McLeish say pre-season that Dann is no better than what we already have?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 16, 2012, 09:06:58 PM
Dann would actually get our defence organised, but as I say I can't see why Collins would go for it.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Ian. on January 16, 2012, 09:10:45 PM
Didn't McLeish say pre-season that Dann is no better than what we already have?
I would hope that now he has seen our players in action he will reconsider that statement if this is true.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: l_mckay on January 16, 2012, 09:23:50 PM
if Dann could stay fit he is definatly better than Collins,cant see this deal happening in this window though!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on January 16, 2012, 09:48:22 PM
We'd have to call him Womble.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Shrek on January 16, 2012, 09:52:13 PM
Didn't McLeish say pre-season that Dann is no better than what we already have?

No, he said that about Roger Johnson, he said Dann was top quality but we probably couldn't afford him

SSN were saying earlier about how Dann had assurances that Samba wouldn't be sold, so there maybe some sort of get out clause?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Matt C on January 16, 2012, 09:58:03 PM
Looks like Samba is off so can't see them letting Dann go until the summer now unfortunately.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: eamonn on January 16, 2012, 10:01:11 PM
I can't find mention of it anywhere, but I'm convinced that we put a sell-on clause when selling Gaz Cahill to Bolton. It was probably something piddly like 15% of any profit but can anyone confirm?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: eamonn on January 16, 2012, 10:05:39 PM
Manchester City goalkeeper Joe Hart: " I'm having very little to do in this team but sometimes you have to make a save and I was able to do that''.

That's the second time I've seen him say that. Can't make up my mind if he's being a cheeky get or just brutally honest.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Matt C on January 16, 2012, 10:54:55 PM
I can't find mention of it anywhere, but I'm convinced that we put a sell-on clause when selling Gaz Cahill to Bolton. It was probably something piddly like 15% of any profit but can anyone confirm?

We do but it's a small percentage of the profit Bolton make on the transfer.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulTheVillan on January 16, 2012, 11:49:10 PM
Hardly anything. 15% of £2.5m

£375,000.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: eamonn on January 17, 2012, 12:28:56 AM
It'll keep Makoun, Jenas and Beye in porridge and porn for the next six months at least.

I'm just surprised it hasn't been reported at all anywhere, has it?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Phil from the upper holte on January 17, 2012, 07:08:50 AM
No sell on clause, more fantastic business by the villa
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Ian. on January 17, 2012, 07:17:25 AM
I suppose the sell on value is so small because he was not at all rated by whoever was questioned about it at the time of the sale. When you think about it we bought Zat to play in that position who MON must have thought was a better prospect.  :o
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SteveN on January 17, 2012, 09:02:50 AM
I suppose the sell on value is so small because he was not at all rated by whoever was questioned about it at the time of the sale. When you think about it we bought Zat to play in that position who MON must have thought was a better prospect.  :o

I listened to a journalist on 5Live over the weekend (McGarry?) who claimed to be close with MON and he said that MON's response to why he sold Cahill was along the lines that Cahill could do everything...apart from defend.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Merv on January 17, 2012, 09:03:30 AM
Ireland has that osgood slatter disease.

Eh? Does he?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: villasjf on January 17, 2012, 09:09:09 AM
Looks like Samba is off so can't see them letting Dann go until the summer now unfortunately.
Isnt Dann injured anyway? I saw on the rumours page collins plus cash for Dann yesterday.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 17, 2012, 09:24:27 AM
Looks like Samba is off so can't see them letting Dann go until the summer now unfortunately.
Isnt Dann injured anyway? I saw on the rumours page collins plus cash for Dann yesterday.

Dann is currently injured but is nearing full fitness I think.  I just read about his injury and really wish I hadn't.  I didn't know such a thing was possible!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: UK Redsox on January 17, 2012, 10:21:16 AM
Ireland has that osgood slatter disease.

Eh? Does he?

I hadn't heard about it. Must be on a kneed to know basis
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: willywombat on January 17, 2012, 10:25:32 AM
I thought that was something kids get that sorts itself out once your bones stopped growing?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 17, 2012, 10:30:52 AM
Didn't McLeish say pre-season that Dann is no better than what we already have?

From memory he said that about Johnson, Dann's CB partner at Small Heath.

From what I understand, Dann was AM's organiser there and would compliment Dunne better as he's more the covering type of CB.  It was also noticable that their slump that lead to relegation was when he was out injured.  I'd be happy with Collins to Sunderland now and waiting until the summer for Dann, with Cuellar playing in the meantime.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Merv on January 17, 2012, 11:07:58 AM
I thought that was something kids get that sorts itself out once your bones stopped growing?

Kind of. It's an overuse injury, and does affect a lot of junior/youth players when, as you say, their body is still developing. Didn't know Ireland suffered from it.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JUAN PABLO on January 17, 2012, 12:07:15 PM
regarding Collins.  Didnt I read AMC has said Collins has now moved into the area and hoped he would be here for a while.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 17, 2012, 12:33:31 PM
He has said to Sky sports that he is unlikely to let players go.  I don't believe this statement as we have come to realise with the club that anything is possible despite what they say i.e. We will not sell Stewart Downing and look what happpened there.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SheffieldVillain on January 17, 2012, 12:58:42 PM
I thought that was something kids get that sorts itself out once your bones stopped growing?

Not always. I still suffer with it in both knees now.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: CJ on January 17, 2012, 01:46:50 PM
Just heard from a pretty good source that Collins to Blackburn with Dann coming our way is definitely on the cards. Great news if it comes off, though doubtless some of our neanderthal supporters would boo him 'cos he played for der bloose'
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 17, 2012, 02:06:05 PM
If Collins/Dunn is true, then it's good business for us.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 17, 2012, 02:08:30 PM
I cant see this happening to be honest.  Why would Collins go to Blackburn for a start?  I wouldnt mind seeing Dann in an AVFC shirt as it clear in the 2nd half of Blues' season that without him at the back, they became quite crap.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Fernando Partridge on January 17, 2012, 03:27:05 PM
Walsall have confirmed interest in Darren Carter- that guys not good enough for them. BSQ player always has been
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Matt C on January 17, 2012, 04:43:53 PM
Ridgewell to Albion could be back on apparently.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: timeoutbigbar on January 17, 2012, 05:33:33 PM
I see the geordies are shelling out ten million on another striker who is away on African Nations duty.  Papiss Cisse, seems to have a decent record, albeit in the Bundesliga.  SSN claiming we were interested.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rudy Can't Fail on January 17, 2012, 06:03:02 PM
If Collins/Dunn is true, then it's good business for us.

Dunn? I really hope you meant Dann.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SoccerHQ on January 17, 2012, 06:53:06 PM
I see the geordies are shelling out ten million on another striker who is away on African Nations duty.  Papiss Cisse, seems to have a decent record, albeit in the Bundesliga.  SSN claiming we were interested.

Good signing imo. Has a good goalscoring record in the Bundesliga like Demba Ba did and they play together for Senegal.

As much as I hate to say it, Newcastle have got to be some sort of role model for us, they weren't even in the prem two seasons ago!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Shrek on January 17, 2012, 08:30:45 PM
I see the geordies are shelling out ten million on another striker who is away on African Nations duty.  Papiss Cisse, seems to have a decent record, albeit in the Bundesliga.  SSN claiming we were interested.

Good signing imo. Has a good goalscoring record in the Bundesliga like Demba Ba did and they play together for Senegal.

As much as I hate to say it, Newcastle have got to be some sort of role model for us, they weren't even in the prem two seasons ago!

They have the fan base though, we don't.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dave on January 17, 2012, 08:36:29 PM
I see the geordies are shelling out ten million on another striker who is away on African Nations duty.  Papiss Cisse, seems to have a decent record, albeit in the Bundesliga.  SSN claiming we were interested.

Good signing imo. Has a good goalscoring record in the Bundesliga like Demba Ba did and they play together for Senegal.

As much as I hate to say it, Newcastle have got to be some sort of role model for us, they weren't even in the prem two seasons ago!

They have the fan base though, we don't.
And that stops us from buying good, cheap, young continental players does it?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Lowendbehold on January 17, 2012, 08:37:23 PM
I see the geordies are shelling out ten million on another striker who is away on African Nations duty.  Papiss Cisse, seems to have a decent record, albeit in the Bundesliga.  SSN claiming we were interested.

Good signing imo. Has a good goalscoring record in the Bundesliga like Demba Ba did and they play together for Senegal.

As much as I hate to say it, Newcastle have got to be some sort of role model for us, they weren't even in the prem two seasons ago!

Sherry was on £43k a week so Warnock Collins & Dunn will be on at least that, in fact more. Together it may be as much as £150k a week.  AM said the other day Warnock is on massive wages and he's 30 and lost his form.  He's not going to get any better. 

AM has confirmed the drive to get the wages down is still on.  So apart from Cuellar Beye o
Who are out of contract in the summer, and Ireland who is starting to play a bit. There is only those three and Petrov and Bent to sort.  I cannot see the last two going this January.  We need Bent to score goals and keep us out of trouble and Petrov is very important to us and is the only experienced central midfielder at the club.

I think Collins and Dunn might go this month if there was a reliable replacement available.  I doubt Dann is on much. Blues were poor payers and Blackburn arn't much better.  So a swop of Collins for Dann might save £20k a week or more.  Persuading Collins to go might be a different matter though.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Lowendbehold on January 17, 2012, 08:38:47 PM
Sorry Shorey not Sherry! Autocorrect !
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Jimmy Smash on January 17, 2012, 09:15:38 PM
I see the geordies are shelling out ten million on another striker who is away on African Nations duty.  Papiss Cisse, seems to have a decent record, albeit in the Bundesliga.  SSN claiming we were interested.

Good signing imo. Has a good goalscoring record in the Bundesliga like Demba Ba did and they play together for Senegal.

As much as I hate to say it, Newcastle have got to be some sort of role model for us, they weren't even in the prem two seasons ago!

They have the fan base though, we don't.

We have the fan base... we just choose not to capitalise on it.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ROBBO on January 17, 2012, 10:04:28 PM
Just completed the BBC predictor thingy and with giving us only one win for the rest of the season i had us finishing fifteenth with 36 points. QPR, Wigan and Bolton bottom to be relegated, Wolves escaping relegation by one point. The big if though is QPR, if they buy a few this month they could improve and make things tighter, no hope for Wigan and Bolton though.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 17, 2012, 10:07:07 PM
I see the geordies are shelling out ten million on another striker who is away on African Nations duty.  Papiss Cisse, seems to have a decent record, albeit in the Bundesliga.  SSN claiming we were interested.

Good signing imo. Has a good goalscoring record in the Bundesliga like Demba Ba did and they play together for Senegal.

As much as I hate to say it, Newcastle have got to be some sort of role model for us, they weren't even in the prem two seasons ago!

They have the fan base though, we don't.
And that stops us from buying good, cheap, young continental players does it?

Absolutely, our strategy is completely wrong.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Irish villain on January 17, 2012, 10:09:39 PM
Just completed the BBC predictor thingy and with giving us only one win for the rest of the season i had us finishing fifteenth with 36 points. QPR, Wigan and Bolton bottom to be relegated, Wolves escaping relegation by one point. The big if though is QPR, if they buy a few this month they could improve and make things tighter, no hope for Wigan and Bolton though.

I'll get the bubbly out...
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ROBBO on January 17, 2012, 10:11:46 PM
Don't go on my predictions IV what do i know.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 17, 2012, 10:12:43 PM
I see the geordies are shelling out ten million on another striker who is away on African Nations duty.  Papiss Cisse, seems to have a decent record, albeit in the Bundesliga.  SSN claiming we were interested.

Good signing imo. Has a good goalscoring record in the Bundesliga like Demba Ba did and they play together for Senegal.

As much as I hate to say it, Newcastle have got to be some sort of role model for us, they weren't even in the prem two seasons ago!

They have the fan base though, we don't.

What difference does that make to the sort of players we sign?

They're not even spending that much money.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Risso on January 17, 2012, 10:16:21 PM
I see the geordies are shelling out ten million on another striker who is away on African Nations duty.  Papiss Cisse, seems to have a decent record, albeit in the Bundesliga.  SSN claiming we were interested.

Good signing imo. Has a good goalscoring record in the Bundesliga like Demba Ba did and they play together for Senegal.

As much as I hate to say it, Newcastle have got to be some sort of role model for us, they weren't even in the prem two seasons ago!

They have the fan base though, we don't.
And that stops us from buying good, cheap, young continental players does it?

Newcastle are a funny one, and I can't make them out this season.

Is their relative success a case of Ashley learning from his mistakes and making a shrewd (if unpopular at the time) managerial signing in Pardew, or have they just got lucky?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ROBBO on January 17, 2012, 10:17:11 PM
I think it displays the level of interest Randy has for us these days Paulie. I'm convinced he is trying hard to sell us.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 17, 2012, 10:18:06 PM
Pardew got the job because he's casino mates with Ashley and Lambias, their CEO (who managed the casino they used).

They've done pretty well so far. It's hard to look at Ben Arfa, Tiote, Ba and Cabaye and not feel a certain amount of jealousy.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Somniloquism on January 17, 2012, 10:26:35 PM
Newcastle are a funny one, and I can't make them out this season.

Is their relative success a case of Ashley learning from his mistakes and making a shrewd (if unpopular at the time) managerial signing in Pardew, or have they just got lucky?

TBH, I think it is the latter but with other influences. They have decided to get cheap european players in and got a decent scouting network going. They gave Pardew carte blanche to get rid of players he deemed trouble makers or might be challenging his authority. By rights they should be in a transitory period but pretty much every player they bought this year has done the business and they also took advantage of a great fixture list of weakened teams at the start which allowed an easier bed-in of said players.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dave on January 17, 2012, 10:29:30 PM
I see the geordies are shelling out ten million on another striker who is away on African Nations duty.  Papiss Cisse, seems to have a decent record, albeit in the Bundesliga.  SSN claiming we were interested.

Good signing imo. Has a good goalscoring record in the Bundesliga like Demba Ba did and they play together for Senegal.

As much as I hate to say it, Newcastle have got to be some sort of role model for us, they weren't even in the prem two seasons ago!

They have the fan base though, we don't.
And that stops us from buying good, cheap, young continental players does it?

Newcastle are a funny one, and I can't make them out this season.

Is their relative success a case of Ashley learning from his mistakes and making a shrewd (if unpopular at the time) managerial signing in Pardew, or have they just got lucky?
Lucky is the wrong word.

They've realised that there is no point trying to complete with buying expensive English players, so they are looking at somewhere where other people aren't.

It might not always work, but you can be pretty sure that you have a better chance of succeeding than the tactic of 'buying the Premier League players that Liverpool and Spurs don't want'.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ROBBO on January 17, 2012, 10:35:02 PM
How many supporters would have been happy with Pardew as our manager? well okay most would have been if we new who the alternative was. For how many years have we been decrying the lack of cheaper imports, all through the MON years and it looks like we are continuing the process, can we get GH back please even with a dicky heart.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TheSandman on January 17, 2012, 10:40:50 PM
Newcastle are a funny one, and I can't make them out this season.

Is their relative success a case of Ashley learning from his mistakes and making a shrewd (if unpopular at the time) managerial signing in Pardew, or have they just got lucky?

Good scouting set up.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Risso on January 17, 2012, 10:44:51 PM
How many supporters would have been happy with Pardew as our manager? well okay most would have been if we new who the alternative was. For how many years have we been decrying the lack of cheaper imports, all through the MON years and it looks like we are continuing the process, can we get GH back please even with a dicky heart.

Why?  In his time here, Houllier bought Darren Bent for a small fortune, Kyle Walker, Robert Pires and Jean II Makoun.  His only foray into the foreign league was Makoun who wasn't particularly cheap, or good.  Plus look at all the absolute shite he bought in his latter years at Liverpool.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 17, 2012, 10:47:43 PM
How many supporters would have been happy with Pardew as our manager? well okay most would have been if we new who the alternative was. For how many years have we been decrying the lack of cheaper imports, all through the MON years and it looks like we are continuing the process, can we get GH back please even with a dicky heart.

Why?  In his time here, Houllier bought Darren Bent for a small fortune, Kyle Walker, Robert Pires and Jean II Makoun.  His only foray into the foreign league was Makoun who wasn't particularly cheap, or good.  Plus look at all the absolute shite he bought in his latter years at Liverpool.

Pires was acquired because we were desperate for bodies, and he was unattached.

Bent was a good signing. Walker did very well for us and is currently holding down a place in a side with title aspirations.

Makoun is one to argue on, but seven matches isn't really the best of runs to settle in a new league.

Houllier had also earmarked Cabaye for this summer, and he'd have been here now if the manager still was.

I'm not saying Houllier was some kind of transfer market genius, but it's safe to say we wouldnt see that brainless fuckwit Hutton running around for us now if he'd still been in charge.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Clampy on January 17, 2012, 10:49:47 PM
I did'nt think there was anything wrong with the players Houiller brought in. Bent's been good, Walker did well even if he was'nt ours and Makoun may have settled had he been given a fair crack this season. Pires was just brought in to pad the squad out when we had that stupid injury list.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TheSandman on January 17, 2012, 10:50:27 PM
He'd have fucked off that useless thunderclunge Warnock too.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dave on January 17, 2012, 10:56:19 PM
Newcastle are a funny one, and I can't make them out this season.

Is their relative success a case of Ashley learning from his mistakes and making a shrewd (if unpopular at the time) managerial signing in Pardew, or have they just got lucky?

Good scouting set up.
Is it though?

Tiote is fair enough, but anyone with even a passing interest in football outside the Premier League (as you would hope even the worst professional scout would have) would have been fully aware of Cabaye, Ba, Santon and Ben Arfa. All of them international players with experience of playing in the Champions League.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 17, 2012, 11:03:31 PM
Fair point Dave. It seems the prices are simply less in France, so I guess it is simply good business sense, not the scouting as such.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: luke25 on January 17, 2012, 11:08:52 PM
Newcastle are a funny one, and I can't make them out this season.

Is their relative success a case of Ashley learning from his mistakes and making a shrewd (if unpopular at the time) managerial signing in Pardew, or have they just got lucky?

Good scouting set up.
Is it though?

Tiote is fair enough, but anyone with even a passing interest in football outside the Premier League (as you would hope even the worst professional scout would have) would have been fully aware of Cabaye, Ba, Santon and Ben Arfa. All of them international players with experience of playing in the Champions League.
Exactly, its not like they're unheard of.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Somniloquism on January 17, 2012, 11:10:22 PM
Newcastle are a funny one, and I can't make them out this season.

Is their relative success a case of Ashley learning from his mistakes and making a shrewd (if unpopular at the time) managerial signing in Pardew, or have they just got lucky?

Good scouting set up.
Is it though?

Tiote is fair enough, but anyone with even a passing interest in football outside the Premier League (as you would hope even the worst professional scout would have) would have been fully aware of Cabaye, Ba, Santon and Ben Arfa. All of them international players with experience of playing in the Champions League.

I would say it is more of a philosophy that they are prepared to get the players in but letting them know they will not stand in the way if a big club comes in for them after a year or so. So they get good young players in rather cheaply and know they will make a good profit if they leave after a good season or two.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: luke25 on January 17, 2012, 11:13:09 PM
Watching the QPR v MK dons match earlier was very impressed with the don's right back, reminded me a lot of Walker.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Risso on January 17, 2012, 11:14:35 PM
How many supporters would have been happy with Pardew as our manager? well okay most would have been if we new who the alternative was. For how many years have we been decrying the lack of cheaper imports, all through the MON years and it looks like we are continuing the process, can we get GH back please even with a dicky heart.

Why?  In his time here, Houllier bought Darren Bent for a small fortune, Kyle Walker, Robert Pires and Jean II Makoun.  His only foray into the foreign league was Makoun who wasn't particularly cheap, or good.  Plus look at all the absolute shite he bought in his latter years at Liverpool.

Pires was acquired because we were desperate for bodies, and he was unattached.

Bent was a good signing. Walker did very well for us and is currently holding down a place in a side with title aspirations.

Makoun is one to argue on, but seven matches isn't really the best of runs to settle in a new league.

Houllier had also earmarked Cabaye for this summer, and he'd have been here now if the manager still was.

I'm not saying Houllier was some kind of transfer market genius, but it's safe to say we wouldnt see that brainless fuckwit Hutton running around for us now if he'd still been in charge.

I'm not arguing that Bent and Walker weren't good signings, just that they're not exactly the sign of a radical transfer genius.  Even that numpty Mazrim has been banging on about Bent for the last five years! ;)
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on January 17, 2012, 11:24:31 PM
About 7 years now.


Oh, erm... how dare you!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: luke25 on January 17, 2012, 11:43:20 PM
Another thing about Newcastle is they sign there players on 5 or 6 year deals.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: mallo on January 18, 2012, 07:50:08 AM
McLeish asked about transfers (Bent especially...)

Click to start hysteria (http://www.metro.co.uk/sport/football/887620-darren-bent-will-cost-liverpool-big-money-suggests-aston-villa-boss#ixzz1jjcqM5PD)
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Richard E on January 18, 2012, 08:12:21 AM
Lazy journalism. Nothing in the article that suggests that Darren Bent or Liverpool were even mentioned in the conversation!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: E I Adio on January 18, 2012, 08:37:21 AM
Desperate journalism more like. His real name is Phil Space.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: john e on January 18, 2012, 08:56:19 AM
'Lazy Journalism'  if i had a pound f................      oh i cant be bothered , to lazy
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Merv on January 18, 2012, 09:08:50 AM
So.

Just a quick check of Villa news this morning and the first two things I read are:

Herd out for at least another month with ankle ligament damage.

Loan deal for Delph to go to Leeds.

Is it sensible to effectively be without two central midfielders for the next month or so? Our options there are getting thinner all the time, it seems - unless McLeish believes Gardener is ready to step up more significantly.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: garyshawsknee on January 18, 2012, 09:11:03 AM
So.

Just a quick check of Villa news this morning and the first two things I read are:

Herd out for at least another month with ankle ligament damage.

Loan deal for Delph to go to Leeds.

Is it sensible to effectively be without two central midfielders for the next month or so? Our options there are getting thinner all the time, it seems - unless McLeish believes Gardener is ready to step up more significantly.


It only takes another injury and were pretty thing with midfielders,id keep him for now.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Shrek on January 18, 2012, 09:17:03 AM
I see the geordies are shelling out ten million on another striker who is away on African Nations duty.  Papiss Cisse, seems to have a decent record, albeit in the Bundesliga.  SSN claiming we were interested.

Good signing imo. Has a good goalscoring record in the Bundesliga like Demba Ba did and they play together for Senegal.

As much as I hate to say it, Newcastle have got to be some sort of role model for us, they weren't even in the prem two seasons ago!

They have the fan base though, we don't.

What difference does that make to the sort of players we sign?

They're not even spending that much money.

If Randy and Ashley do not want to put money in, then surely the fact they are getting 15-20k more fans every other week means they can afford to buy players cheap who are coming towards the end of their contracts, but still pay decent wages.

Is my logic wrong?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dave on January 18, 2012, 09:19:49 AM
If Randy and Ashley do not want to put money in, then surely the fact they are getting 15-20k more fans every other week means they can afford to buy players cheap who are coming towards the end of their contracts, but still pay decent wages.

Is my logic wrong?
Pretty much.

We were able to find the money to sign Given, Hutton and N'Zogbia. We weren't forced to sign them over cheaper, better players.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Merv on January 18, 2012, 09:28:46 AM
Pardew got the job because he's casino mates with Ashley and Lambias, their CEO (who managed the casino they used).

They've done pretty well so far. It's hard to look at Ben Arfa, Tiote, Ba and Cabaye and not feel a certain amount of jealousy.

Newcastle are a funny one to call - like Risso, I'm wondering whether they've just got reasonably lucky or whether this part of a longer strategy beginning to pay off. The club have definitely stepped away from buying big name players on large salaries - it eventually cost them with relegation. What they've done instead is recruit the kind of players Paulie listed above - modestly priced, wages presumably well within budget, players hungry to succeed. It's working well for them so far.

Pardew's appointment was controversial and I'm not entirely sure he got the job purely for footballing reasons - connections played a huge part - then again, he did a good job at West Ham and seems to have got it just right at Newcastle.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 18, 2012, 09:33:26 AM
He'd have fucked off that useless thunderclunge Warnock too.

And that other useless thunderclunge (excellent word, by the way!) Agbonglahor.

Houllier has his way, but he did fall out with three quarters of the one of the best PL defences when he arrived, that have since failed to regain their collective form.  I think Randy asked McLeish to try and get the best from them rather than write them off, as Gezza had done, when he arrived.  He's doing that, with good responses from Dunne and Ireland thus far.  Where we go from here in the summer will be interesting.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Matt C on January 18, 2012, 09:37:07 AM
Matt Kendrick reporting Delph loan to Leeds progressing.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 18, 2012, 09:50:45 AM
As for Newcastle, I think we might be going a bit OTT on them and their 'master plan'.  Yes, they're trying a different approach and there are parts of that we can take on board, but apart from Ba's goals they'd be mid-table and we wouldn't even be talking about them.  And was that a master-stroke or a punt on an injured player that's paid off spectacularly?  He's 26, so if as good as he's seemed over this half season, why was he scratching around for a club and playing at West Ham?

The true test of any system is it's longevity and ability to produce good and consistent returns over a period of time.  So I look at the Swansea footballing philosophy, Ajax's accademy (and Villa's!) and Arsenal for true examples we can learn from.  If Newcastle are still doing the same thing in the same way and getting the same results in 5-10 years time then we can say it's something to copy, but after 6 months we can't be sure it's not just a fluke. 
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on January 18, 2012, 10:12:15 AM
God, things must be bad when we're citing Newcastle as an example to follow. There's no mystery with them. For whatever reason the manager has clicked with the players and they're playing their hearts out for him. they've also got most of the carroll money still so the board there aren't splashing out compared to us
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 18, 2012, 10:19:18 AM
I see the geordies are shelling out ten million on another striker who is away on African Nations duty.  Papiss Cisse, seems to have a decent record, albeit in the Bundesliga.  SSN claiming we were interested.

Good signing imo. Has a good goalscoring record in the Bundesliga like Demba Ba did and they play together for Senegal.

As much as I hate to say it, Newcastle have got to be some sort of role model for us, they weren't even in the prem two seasons ago!

They have the fan base though, we don't.

What difference does that make to the sort of players we sign?

They're not even spending that much money.

If Randy and Ashley do not want to put money in, then surely the fact they are getting 15-20k more fans every other week means they can afford to buy players cheap who are coming towards the end of their contracts, but still pay decent wages.

Is my logic wrong?

Yes

They're not buying particularly expensive players, certainly no more than the type of player we've bought in the past.

Tiote cost £3.5m
Cabaye £5m
Ben Arfa £6m
Ba was a free transfer

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 18, 2012, 10:20:30 AM
As for Newcastle, I think we might be going a bit OTT on them and their 'master plan'.  Yes, they're trying a different approach and there are parts of that we can take on board, but apart from Ba's goals they'd be mid-table and we wouldn't even be talking about them.  And was that a master-stroke or a punt on an injured player that's paid off spectacularly?  He's 26, so if as good as he's seemed over this half season, why was he scratching around for a club and playing at West Ham?

Team in "if you took away their main source of goals, they wouldn't do as well" shocker ;-)

Newcastle are far from just about Ba. Look at their midfield for a start, very solid in the middle.

Also at the back, they're getting good performances out of Coloccini.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Merv on January 18, 2012, 10:22:30 AM
Not necessarily an example to follow per se (the question of luck has been present in just about every post about them) but they have started to rebuild themselves smartly from the disaster of three/four seasons ago. They overspent hugely on players and wages, and suffered as a result, but seem to have recruited smartly and can now invest (Cisse, £10m) when the right opportunity comes up.

If Villa follow the same path we're all hoping (hoping... might not be the case), we can continue to off-load the big earners at the top end of their careers during the summer and  begin to invest sensibly again.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on January 18, 2012, 10:26:20 AM
Big difference is, the newcastle board are operating a proper sell to buy policy. For example if we'd had the 15m Lerner pocketed last summer we could have signed all of newcastle's signings and still bought N'zog, Hutton and Given
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 18, 2012, 10:29:13 AM
God, things must be bad when we're citing Newcastle as an example to follow. There's no mystery with them. For whatever reason the manager has clicked with the players and they're playing their hearts out for him. they've also got most of the carroll money still so the board there aren't splashing out compared to us

We still have the majority of the Young and Downing money.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: garyshawsknee on January 18, 2012, 10:33:44 AM
They got Graham Carr (Dad of comedian) as a scout a year or two ago,so it may be a simple as that,Pardew has an idea of the players he wants and Carr goes out and looks for them.

Other clubs use agents far too often to get their players.(Not saying we do.)
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 18, 2012, 10:40:16 AM
As for Newcastle, I think we might be going a bit OTT on them and their 'master plan'.  Yes, they're trying a different approach and there are parts of that we can take on board, but apart from Ba's goals they'd be mid-table and we wouldn't even be talking about them.  And was that a master-stroke or a punt on an injured player that's paid off spectacularly?  He's 26, so if as good as he's seemed over this half season, why was he scratching around for a club and playing at West Ham?

Team in "if you took away their main source of goals, they wouldn't do as well" shocker ;-)

Newcastle are far from just about Ba. Look at their midfield for a start, very solid in the middle.

Also at the back, they're getting good performances out of Coloccini.

I'm not saying they're crap, just that the highly unexpected goal return from Ba has propelled them further up the league then anyone expected.  And if it wasn't for that we wouldn't be talking about they're other signings in such glowing terms.

But as I said, whether or not they've found a good blueprint for success will be revealed in whether they can keep it up.  Not just for the rest of the season, but long term.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JUAN PABLO on January 18, 2012, 11:11:07 AM
As for Newcastle, I think we might be going a bit OTT on them and their 'master plan'.  Yes, they're trying a different approach and there are parts of that we can take on board, but apart from Ba's goals they'd be mid-table and we wouldn't even be talking about them.  And was that a master-stroke or a punt on an injured player that's paid off spectacularly?  He's 26, so if as good as he's seemed over this half season, why was he scratching around for a club and playing at West Ham?

Team in "if you took away their main source of goals, they wouldn't do as well" shocker ;-)

Newcastle are far from just about Ba. Look at their midfield for a start, very solid in the middle.

Also at the back, they're getting good performances out of Coloccini.

and I see they added another striker Cisse
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Merv on January 18, 2012, 11:21:34 AM
We still have the majority of the Young and Downing money.

Do we? I know we have the money in terms of receiving it, but whether it's going to be made available for transfer funds is debatable, I think.

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 18, 2012, 11:37:04 AM
We still have the majority of the Young and Downing money.

Do we? I know we have the money in terms of receiving it, but whether it's going to be made available for transfer funds is debatable, I think.

Yes, it's one we should get answered in the summer when Beye, Heskey & Carlos all leave for nothing.  If it's truely just a wages issue then we can spend.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Irish villain on January 18, 2012, 12:07:25 PM
I think we should offer Cueller a new contract. Who would we get, as good as him, on cheaper wages?

I hope people are right when they say we will be investing heavily this summer once the wage bill is cleared. I have thought so too in a while. A period of retrenchment should be followed by some heavy investment.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 18, 2012, 12:16:25 PM
I hope people are right when they say we will be investing heavily this summer once the wage bill is cleared. I have thought so too in a while. A period of retrenchment should be followed by some heavy investment.

I doubt it

The club keep saying we have to be self financing - why people assume that applies purely to wage bill is beyond me.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: glasses on January 18, 2012, 12:33:45 PM
God, things must be bad when we're citing Newcastle as an example to follow. There's no mystery with them. For whatever reason the manager has clicked with the players and they're playing their hearts out for him. they've also got most of the carroll money still so the board there aren't splashing out compared to us
So there isn't a mystery, and then there is?

I think they have used the Carroll money well on good players in all areas of the pitch and are playing like a team. You can't predict the future really, so it may only be a one season (or even half a season) anomoly with them. Fact remains though at present, they have a team filled with good players playing good football and getting good results in the now.

Ba has been freakishly good. He reminds me of Martin Laursen (bear with me here!), in that they are both brilliant players when they are fit, but have dodgy medical backgrounds which perhaps means the top clubs wont take the risks on them because they potentially could be sidelined for long periods. Or in Ba's case, Stoke!

Fair play to Pardew who got a right load of stick when he got the job.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Chris Smith on January 18, 2012, 12:42:58 PM
I hope people are right when they say we will be investing heavily this summer once the wage bill is cleared. I have thought so too in a while. A period of retrenchment should be followed by some heavy investment.

I doubt it

The club keep saying we have to be self financing - why people assume that applies purely to wage bill is beyond me.

They haven't said anything about transfers, just that the wage bill has to be at a certain level.

I think they'll spend, they did find the money for Bent after all, but I'm not expecting massive amounts. Investment in players can increase revenue from gates, TV and prize money.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 18, 2012, 12:46:14 PM
They said the club has to live on its own means.

Why would that only involve the wage bill?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pav on January 18, 2012, 12:49:41 PM
At least there's a song for our dwindling attendances to sing
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Chris Smith on January 18, 2012, 01:00:19 PM
They said the club has to live on its own means.

Why would that only involve the wage bill?

I can only recall statements about the wage bill. We'll see in due course but I expect them to invest with a plan to improve revenue but with it all having to operate within a strict wage  structure.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 18, 2012, 01:07:13 PM
They said the club has to live on its own means.

Why would that only involve the wage bill?

Even if that is right, then spending the transfer profit we've made recently would give us quite a bit of room to move in the summer market.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 18, 2012, 01:09:40 PM
They said the club has to live on its own means.

Why would that only involve the wage bill?

Even if that is right, then spending the transfer profit we've made recently would give us quite a bit of room to move in the summer market.

It depends on how they define living within its own means.

What about those loans to Randy that are due to be paid back at some time?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 18, 2012, 01:14:54 PM
Yes, that will obviously effect funds for players if we are 'living within our means'. 

My opinion on what Randy's intentions are, once the wagebill is where we want, remain the same - let's wait and see!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: monkeyboy on January 18, 2012, 01:40:50 PM
They said the club has to live on its own means.

Why would that only involve the wage bill?

I can only recall statements about the wage bill. We'll see in due course but I expect them to invest with a plan to improve revenue but with it all having to operate within a strict wage  structure.

Welcome to our new home - it's known as mid table and is in the suburb of mediocrity
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: UK Redsox on January 18, 2012, 01:44:45 PM
They said the club has to live on its own means.

Why would that only involve the wage bill?



I can only recall statements about the wage bill. We'll see in due course but I expect them to invest with a plan to improve revenue but with it all having to operate within a strict wage  structure.

Welcome to our new home - it's known as mid table and is in the suburb of mediocrity

"New" home ?

Villa have been mid-table for years (finishing 6th doesn't exactly count as challenging at the top)
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Merv on January 18, 2012, 01:52:28 PM
They said the club has to live on its own means.

Why would that only involve the wage bill?

I don't think it will. I'm sure there is a drive to bring the wage bill down, but no-one's telling me that there's a £15m pot of transfer spend available - McLeish can use it for fees only and not wages for a player he signs? No.

I don't think we'll see the remaining £££ from the Downing/Young sales again, it's been used elsewhere. We'll probably be able to spend what we generate from sales in the summer, and nothing more.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 18, 2012, 01:52:50 PM
"New" home ?

Villa have been mid-table for years (finishing 6th doesn't exactly count as challenging at the top)

Personally I class 6th as above mid table, mainly as it usually brings a European place with it.  It's subjective, but I'd say 8th to about 14th is 'mid table'.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TheSandman on January 18, 2012, 03:05:59 PM
Our wagebill is still above the recommended level of 50% of turnover now and the departures of Cuellar, Heskey and Beye in the summer still won't see it fall below that so I don't foresee much additional spending in the summer (especially as Cuellar and Heskey will most likely need replacing as we'll be short of strikers and centre halves).
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: hipkiss92 on January 18, 2012, 04:07:07 PM
I know it's not the best financial policy, but whatever happened to 'speculate to accumulate'? Instead of reigning in the money available so that McLeish has no room to maneuver, why don't they give say, 10/12 million and see what he can do with it?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TimTheVillain on January 18, 2012, 04:26:13 PM
I know it's not the best financial policy, but whatever happened to 'speculate to accumulate'? Instead of reigning in the money available so that McLeish has no room to maneuver, why don't they give say, 10/12 million and see what he can do with it?

That's the $64 million dollar question.

Well, not quite, but you know what I mean.

As I see it, Randy's cheque book is firmly closed now, so we have to wheel and deal - beg, steal or borrow ( and sell).

This new wages to income ratio is a big issue at VP, they certainly like to point it out a lot, more so than any other club, when is it coming into force, how are the likes of Spurs getting round it ? - Their wage bill doesn't appear to be going downwards.

Oh the joys of supporting a 'middle table with no cash' club again !!


Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: supertom on January 18, 2012, 05:26:24 PM
Randy did take a big punt last season on Darren Bent. In fairness even he was sensible enough to weigh up the cost of relegation against 24 million on DB. I just don't see him doing the same thing again. He probably feels we're safe enough not to have to speculate to consolodate. Maybe that or even if we were really in the shit right now, he couldn't afford to do it again.

I know we sold Downing and Young, which kind of covered the Bent sale, but we couldn't have been entirely sure back then, just what a weasly, money grabbing fox hunt Downing was.

We should really speculate to accumulate, but I can't see Randy doing that again. He took us as far as we could go, without getting enough back to warrant all the expenditure. I see that he's trying to make us a viable business, and probably to sell. Perhaps Randy feels a mid table club that stays in the black, is better than a top six club that loses money every year. That might be wrong, it might not. Perhaps any rich Arabs sniffing around us 2 years ago, have caught another scent whilst we've bombed down to mediocrity.

Or to cut a long one short. We aint signing any one!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: bertlambshank on January 18, 2012, 05:43:27 PM
If we was in the bottom 3 would Randy be splashing the cash?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TimTheVillain on January 18, 2012, 06:09:16 PM
If we was in the bottom 3 would Randy be splashing the cash?

Interesting question - I think we'd be buying more 'has beens' in on short term contracts in the hope that they'd save us.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: CJ on January 18, 2012, 07:02:12 PM
If we was in the bottom 3 would Randy be splashing the cash?

Difficult to say. Last season it was straightforward - we had 2 wingers getting balls into the box and creating loads of chances but no-one to stick them away, so identifying the solution and getting the player was fairly obvious. This season I'm not sure we could identify any realistic single player who'd turn us round, and given that I don't think we'll be getting anyone in.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Irish villain on January 18, 2012, 07:31:30 PM
I wouldn't call sixth mid-table. Those years we finished sixth we were within a few points of being fourth and spent time within the top 4. Weren't we title contenders in 08/09 at Christmas? We were where Spurs are now.....
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ROBBO on January 18, 2012, 08:19:31 PM
So after six years we are no better than we were under deadly, probably worse because at least he knew more about running a club than the lot we have now. Not that i'm advocating his return mind you.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: richard moore on January 19, 2012, 08:04:02 AM
I wouldn't call sixth mid-table. Those years we finished sixth we were within a few points of being fourth and spent time within the top 4. Weren't we title contenders in 08/09 at Christmas? We were where Spurs are now.....

Technically, I think you are right though it kinda feels that way. I think of it more as the 'best of the rest', the rest being a very long tail of very ordinary fare. And of course it comes with the seemingly poisoned chalace of the Europa League
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: badluckeric(gates) on January 19, 2012, 09:55:09 AM
Now let me think....Mid table club or bankrupt club, which do I prefer..hmm difficult one that but for me mid table just edges it.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: N'ZMAV on January 19, 2012, 09:57:32 AM
Gotta love mid-table.... Charlton fans would kill for it now, we do need to be careful what we wish for...
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: N'ZMAV on January 19, 2012, 10:00:58 AM
Mutch at Blues looks a decent player...
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: richard moore on January 19, 2012, 10:10:56 AM
Mutch at Blues looks a decent player...

Yes, he does doesn't he

At the other end of the scale, Elikobi (sp?) makes Stephen Warnock look like Carlos Alberto
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 19, 2012, 10:35:06 AM
We should really speculate to accumulate, but I can't see Randy doing that again. He took us as far as we could go, without getting enough back to warrant all the expenditure. I see that he's trying to make us a viable business, and probably to sell. Perhaps Randy feels a mid table club that stays in the black, is better than a top six club that loses money every year. That might be wrong, it might not. Perhaps any rich Arabs sniffing around us 2 years ago, have caught another scent whilst we've bombed down to mediocrity.

The thing is the 'speculate to accumulate' philosophy takes a ridiculous amount of cash right now.  If we want to get to where say Spurs are, or back to where we were under MON, you're talking about £50-£100m over two seasons, with no guarantee of success.  If he's got say £30-40m to put in, we could expect to get to 6th-ish again at best, which hardly justifies the expense financially, as he's learnt.

As a fan I'd still say spend the £30-40m and lets be the best we can be, but I must admit I can't see a good business case for it.   
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 19, 2012, 10:54:01 AM
Realistically for a club our size and the income generated, spending £30m every season on transfers is about right.  I've said all along that at the moment I don't mind finishing mid table due to the financial constraints we are under but all I ask for from the Team and management is some good football.  At the moment, what we are witnessing is just plain dross.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: N'ZMAV on January 19, 2012, 11:02:07 AM
I like MAtt Phillips at Blackpool too. Think he'd be a useful signing.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 19, 2012, 11:03:48 AM
Realistically for a club our size and the income generated, spending £30m every season on transfers is about right.  I've said all along that at the moment I don't mind finishing mid table due to the financial constraints we are under but all I ask for from the Team and management is some good football.  At the moment, what we are witnessing is just plain dross.

£30 would be close to 50% of our turnover, wouldn't it?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: N'ZMAV on January 19, 2012, 11:04:24 AM
and about 50% of our wage bill too
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: villasjf on January 19, 2012, 11:12:43 AM
I know it's not the best financial policy, but whatever happened to 'speculate to accumulate'? Instead of reigning in the money available so that McLeish has no room to maneuver, why don't they give say, 10/12 million and see what he can do with it?

Yes but a couple of Huttons maybe or 1 Hutton and give the rest to Spurs for the dud they loaned us.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 19, 2012, 11:19:44 AM
ok, maybe about £15 - £20m as opposed to the £30m I mentioned before?  Need to build up our foreign fan base.  Lets sign a couple of chinese players.  that will drum up some interest in the far east :-)
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 19, 2012, 11:34:37 AM
I have no problem with that, but only if their good enough.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 19, 2012, 11:41:03 AM
I have no problem with that, but only if their good enough.
Yes I agree.  I think we need a core base of experienced players (7 maybe?) on the higher wage bracket with the rest made up of youth players on the lower wages. 
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: N'ZMAV on January 19, 2012, 11:53:34 AM
Onouha on his way to QPR for £3m. Surely we should be looking at players like this. Good right back and can play at centre back.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Matt C on January 19, 2012, 11:55:37 AM
Onouha on his way to QPR for £3m. Surely we should be looking at players like this. Good right back and can play at centre back.

And on a reported £80,000 per week. Staggering.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on January 19, 2012, 11:57:54 AM
With 4 centre halves and 4 guys who can play right back I cant see there being any chance of going for him with money scarce and needing a central midfielder if anything.

He is a good player but not really anything more than that.
I'd rather have him than Hutton but too late now.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 19, 2012, 12:06:38 PM
And on a reported £80,000 per week. Staggering.

you're joking!?!?!?!   :o :o :o :o :o :o  He is a good player and good value for money, as in the transfer fee BUT £80k a week???  You're having a laugh!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Irish villain on January 19, 2012, 12:46:54 PM
Mid-table is preferable to bankruptcy of course and most of us accept the reality. It just makes us quite dull. Neutrals always used to say to me, villa are just happy to be there. That all changed when Randy arrived. Now though we're back to the comfort zone, happy to be there and you can understand why its frustrating to fans. If the football was better attendances wouldn't be so low. Hence we'd all rather mid-table if we gave it more of a go and played some decent stuff.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Monty on January 19, 2012, 12:55:17 PM
Like I've said before, it's not where we are, it's how we're existing while we're here.

Jorge Valdano once said: "in a league, only one team will win. If everyone plays "results football", what have the other teams contributed?" Slightly less romantically, that's my criticism of the team at the moment. If we can't win, we may as well be more entertaining. But there's a listlessness, a sense of middling around, almost of 'can't be bothered' around the club at the moment, which is a little hard to support.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: garyshawsknee on January 19, 2012, 01:05:36 PM
And on a reported £80,000 per week. Staggering.

you're joking!?!?!?!   :o :o :o :o :o :o  He is a good player and good value for money, as in the transfer fee BUT £80k a week???  You're having a laugh!

Guess who his agent is?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: richard moore on January 19, 2012, 01:10:21 PM
Like I've said before, it's not where we are, it's how we're existing while we're here.

Jorge Valdano once said: "in a league, only one team will win. If everyone plays "results football", what have the other teams contributed?" Slightly less romantically, that's my criticism of the team at the moment. If we can't win, we may as well be more entertaining. But there's a listlessness, a sense of middling around, almost of 'can't be bothered' around the club at the moment, which is a little hard to support.

Yes, I agree with that Monty. I know it's utter madness and would be disastrous in all probability, but I do have days when I almost wish we got ourselves relegated if only for something to happen that might inject some fresh life into things and make us get noticed - a kinda 'fresh slate' approach. Anything rather than this numbing middling around as you say
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: bertlambshank on January 19, 2012, 01:13:57 PM
And on a reported £80,000 per week. Staggering.I

you're joking!?!?!?!   :o :o :o :o :o :o  He is a good player and good value for money, as in the transfer fee BUT £80k a week???  You're having a laugh!

Guess who his agent is?
Robin Hood?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Merv on January 19, 2012, 01:19:29 PM
Speculate to accumulate... obviously, we're not doing that. But we're not even being able to spend what we've earned through transfers out. I'd settle for us just moving forward to get to that point again. As it is, we're hamstrung into six-week loan deals because, for the manager, it's that or nothing, it seems.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: N'ZMAV on January 19, 2012, 01:28:10 PM
No way is he worth £80k a week. FFS. Football is screwed.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Hoppo on January 19, 2012, 01:29:35 PM
Why dont you just shut this thread down so people can just get used to the long hard fight ahead?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: KevinGage on January 19, 2012, 01:58:46 PM
Like I've said before, it's not where we are, it's how we're existing while we're here.

Jorge Valdano once said: "in a league, only one team will win. If everyone plays "results football", what have the other teams contributed?" Slightly less romantically, that's my criticism of the team at the moment. If we can't win, we may as well be more entertaining. But there's a listlessness, a sense of middling around, almost of 'can't be bothered' around the club at the moment, which is a little hard to support.

There was that quote a few weeks back from a 'source close to RL'  given to one of the dailys about how we're going to concentrate on getting the finances in check for the next two years.  It won't be very sexy, but it will stand to us in the longrun et.c. 

Which is fine, except we don't operate in isolation.  If we effectively opt out for the next two years:

(a)  How big will the gulf between ourselves and the likes of Tottenham, Liverpool and the sides we were once actively competing with extend to?

(b) How many of the clubs on a par with (and currently below) us will overtake us?

and

(c)  How much will it cost to regain the initiative, or even attempt to regain some of the lost ground?

Also, if the club are set fair on a course of opting out, can they really be that surprised if supporters do the same? 
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: drisaac on January 19, 2012, 02:16:47 PM
No way is he worth £80k a week. FFS. Football is screwed.

Assuming that QPR will bring in approximately £60 million (I'm guessing...) this season, what would be a reasonable wage for him to earn?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: garyshawsknee on January 19, 2012, 02:37:29 PM
And on a reported £80,000 per week. Staggering.I

you're joking!?!?!?!   :o :o :o :o :o :o  He is a good player and good value for money, as in the transfer fee BUT £80k a week???  You're having a laugh!

Guess who his agent is?
Robin Hood?

I can't spell his name,but its the weasel who represents Tevez and Hughes. Wouldn't be surprised if hes linked with the two Brazilians QPR are buying.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 19, 2012, 02:38:55 PM
And on a reported £80,000 per week. Staggering.I

you're joking!?!?!?!   :o :o :o :o :o :o  He is a good player and good value for money, as in the transfer fee BUT £80k a week???  You're having a laugh!

Guess who his agent is?
Robin Hood?



I can't spell his name,but its the weasel who represents Tevez and Hughes. Wouldn't be surprised if hes linked with the two Brazilians QPR are buying.

Kia Joorb......(i cant spell his surname without looking it up! lol)
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 19, 2012, 02:42:22 PM
So, they agent for the manager is also the agent for the players he is buying?  No conflict of interest there then!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dante Lavelli on January 19, 2012, 03:16:33 PM
I wouldn't call sixth mid-table. Those years we finished sixth we were within a few points of being fourth and spent time within the top 4. Weren't we title contenders in 08/09 at Christmas? We were where Spurs are now.....

The problem is, Spurs are being run within their means whereas the wages we were paying and the amount we were spending were not sustainable.  The cold reality is that MON's period at the club has been a straitjacket for the club ever since he left.  We are arguably only just getting ourselves back to the point where we have some flexibility to be adventurous.  Where we will or not is open for debate.   

Apologies - I joined this debate late and have since read that others have already said pretty much the same.  Ignore me. 
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on January 19, 2012, 04:31:06 PM
that's the thing with a lot of these deals. The transfer fee might be nominal, but when an above average player asks and can get 80 grand, you can see why there isn't much movement. If the player ends being Steve Sidwell or Heskey, servicable, decent on his day and not much else then he ends up in rotation with a big wage for a few years. If clubs in our position, and QPR are below that spend that much on wages it better be for much better than a Onouha type player, and the return better be quick. The world knows Hughes is the manager, that QPR are desperate and either clubs, agents, players or a combination of all three will be licking their lips as the window winds down.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dante Lavelli on January 19, 2012, 05:22:50 PM
that's the thing with a lot of these deals. The transfer fee might be nominal, but when an above average player asks and can get 80 grand, you can see why there isn't much movement. If the player ends being Steve Sidwell or Heskey, servicable, decent on his day and not much else then he ends up in rotation with a big wage for a few years. If clubs in our position, and QPR are below that spend that much on wages it better be for much better than a Onouha type player, and the return better be quick. The world knows Hughes is the manager, that QPR are desperate and either clubs, agents, players or a combination of all three will be licking their lips as the window winds down.

It also emphasises the benefits of having a good youth system.  At least then you have a few seasons before they start asking for crazy money.  Ditto buying players direct from abroad rather than letting them acclimatise at a Wigan beforehand.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 19, 2012, 05:26:29 PM
Onourha on 80k a week is a total shambles. Seth Johnson comes to mind. The need for a wage cap, set spends, squad limits etc should be explored.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SoccerHQ on January 19, 2012, 06:02:04 PM
With this Onouha deal, QPR remind me a bit of what West Ham were like when Egghead Magnsson took over and they gave Lucas Neill, Boa Morte, Ljungberg and Kieron Dyer all massive contracts.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TheSandman on January 19, 2012, 06:47:47 PM
The British Premier League transfer market is completely poisoned and it's getting to the stage we shouldn't be shopping in it at all. £80K a week for Onuoha and Welbeck demanding £60K a week at United. It's getting to the stage that the rump of our dealings should be from abroad or from the lower divisions.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: spangley1812 on January 19, 2012, 07:21:24 PM
Mark Hughes has agreed a deal to bring defender Taye Taiwo to QPR from AC Milan........according to BBC Sport
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: supertom on January 19, 2012, 07:45:08 PM
City, Chelsea etc have just made a lot of pretty average players, extremely well paid to not even warm the bench. As we've found by getting the unwanted Ireland, that we had to pay through the nose.

But yeah, sadly, if you want to shop in this market, particularly buying bigger clubs cast offs, it's extremely expensive.

Personally I don't want us to ever deal with the likes of City, Spurs, Chelsea, Utd. Any players they'll sell will be shit, unwanted and come with ludicrous wage demands. Onouha is okay, nothing more. He should be on 25-30k a week, and that's being generous. Whether he's taken a paycut or not, I don't know, but for damn sure, QPR will be paying silly wages.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SoccerHQ on January 19, 2012, 08:12:25 PM
QPR signing all these full backs...can we have Luke Young back please?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Clampy on January 19, 2012, 09:24:22 PM
QPR signing all these full backs...can we have Luke Young back please?

And play him at left back.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Shrek on January 19, 2012, 09:38:42 PM
QPR signing all these full backs...can we have Luke Young back please?

And play him at left back.

Yes please
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: villa `cross the mersey on January 19, 2012, 10:06:09 PM


Onouha is okay, nothing more. He should be on 25-30k a week, and that's being generous.

No one should be on that level of salary for kicking a football around - its totally obscene. I for one will be turning my back on the game at the end of this season ....... I am sure Randy  won`t miss me !!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: eamonn on January 19, 2012, 10:17:50 PM
Who says Neddy Noodle is on 80 grand a week? Sound like a load of betty swollocks to me.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: MONCABA on January 19, 2012, 10:37:45 PM
Ditto
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 19, 2012, 10:47:23 PM
Mark Hughes has agreed a deal to bring defender Taye Taiwo to QPR from AC Milan........according to BBC Sport

Did we not want him at some point?


What happened to our Nigerian trialist right back? Anyone is better than Hutton and Snivels
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on January 19, 2012, 11:23:13 PM
Mark Hughes has agreed a deal to bring defender Taye Taiwo to QPR from AC Milan........according to BBC Sport

Did we not want him at some point?


What happened to our Nigerian trialist right back? Anyone is better than Hutton and Snivels

I thought he was a left back?

Anyway, I heard he wasn't invited for trial after blabbing on his twitter or something.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Steve R on January 20, 2012, 12:31:14 AM
Of all the positions in the team, full back is the least likely to win you points. A poor fb can certainly cost you, but I cannot see the marginal difference between say a competent one and a very good one being worth premium money.

We spent 12 or 13 mill trying to replace Freddy Bouma; even if they had turned out to be ok it was a pretty stupid thing to do.

I have no idea what Onuoha was on at City, but he will not have accepted a wage drop. I would guess that City are subsidising the deal with a lower fee and 'loyalty' bonus' etc.

It still makes little sense, full back is hardly Hughes' problem.

Maybe the unwarranted high wages in our game also owe something to some manager's real priority - their CV. The fact that such deals ultimately come back to haunt the club seems to be of little concern, they can always jump ship when their decisions start to rebound ;)
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 20, 2012, 01:03:49 AM
I disagree with the start. Great full backs at the top end are the difference between good and brilliant teams at times. Full backs who defend, but equally attack well become secondary wingers, and create a hell of a lot of openings. Walker showed that for us last season, he was a key man.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: themossman on January 20, 2012, 09:29:30 AM
I do too. Every really good team has full backs who play a big role in attack.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 20, 2012, 09:43:12 AM
Personally I don't want us to ever deal with the likes of City, Spurs, Chelsea, Utd. Any players they'll sell will be shit, unwanted and come with ludicrous wage demands.

I think this was said when MON was here, but Brian Clough had a policy of buying players who saw Forest as a step up, rather than those who were moving to get a game from a 'bigger club'.  That way they were hungrier and gave more for the team, always trying to prove themselves.  MON seemed to follow that with us, with the possible exception of Dunne, yet we still ended up paying big wages.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Matt C on January 20, 2012, 09:56:00 AM
(Relatively speaking) I've no problem with the proven star players, the lynchpins of the the side (Given, Gabby, Bent et al) picking up the big money. It's when the squad players, those on the fringes pick up 40k+ you have a problem and that's what I guess when we talk of the 'wage situation' is what we're trying to change.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 20, 2012, 10:08:53 AM
(Relatively speaking) I've no problem with the proven star players, the lynchpins of the the side (Given, Gabby, Bent et al) picking up the big money. It's when the squad players, those on the fringes pick up 40k+ you have a problem and that's what I guess when we talk of the 'wage situation' is what we're trying to change.

The problem is that those two are inter-linked.

Say you've got the Gabby's of the team on £60k a week and the Hutton's on £30k.  When renewing his contract, Gabby will want a rise, which we give to him as otherwise he'll go and get it elsewhere.  So when Hutton is in next he wants a rise too, probably the same percentage wise as Gabby got, making him a £40k a week player.  It's OK to say 'let Hutton go', but the replacement we will then need will also know, through his agent, what we're paying to other players and be looking for the same as he was, plus we then also pay a transfer fee.

The kids are an option, but before long they'll be knocking on the door asking for parity with first team players if they become regulars themselves.

I'm not sure what the answer is, but the wagebill is basically a scale thing, so whatever you pay at the top end is reflected at the middle and bottom.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 20, 2012, 10:26:58 AM
I tell you whats making me laugh at the moment is all these reports of what Given has said about Keane's arrival saying it will give players a kick up the backside.  Keane is here from another 5 games so I cant see why the likes of Bent and Gabby would be too worried as they all know he will be gone by the end of next month so he will no longer be a "threat" to their position.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: KevinGage on January 20, 2012, 11:06:42 AM
Of all the positions in the team, full back is the least likely to win you points. A poor fb can certainly cost you, but I cannot see the marginal difference between say a competent one and a very good one being worth premium money.

Would have to say I disagree with that.

There was a time when that was right, when you could get any jobbing, solid pro and stick him in there.

But in the current game, the best ones are worth their weight in gold. 

The way some teams are set up, the only width they get is from their fullbacks (or wingbacks).    Whilst in other sides, the fullback overlaps with the winger/ wide midfielder  and can cause mayhem down the flanks.  If the player is good enough, this often means the opposition have to focus more on containing the threat rather than attacking themselves.  So you're neutralising their attacking threat into the bargain.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: garyshawsknee on January 20, 2012, 11:19:25 AM
I think they're really important nowadays and it's a shame ours are so poor. If you have decent attacking full backs you could play a narrow midfield and not be so reliant on wingers.

What makes it worse is that I remember us being linked with Walker before he went to Spurs.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 20, 2012, 11:30:16 AM
My issue with our fullbacks isn't that they don't get forward enough, but thet they're too unreliable defensively, especially Warnock at the moment.  Hence we should be trying the likes of Cuellar and Clark there, as even though they wouldn't give us too much going forward, they would tighten us up at the back. 

The issue of getting good modern and attacking fullbacks, who can also defend, can then wait until the summer.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: KevinGage on January 20, 2012, 11:33:37 AM
The Walker loan is often highlighted as a reason not to go that route.

But -and I admit this sounds a bit weird-  we were perhaps unlucky that he hit the ground running and was in top form pretty much from the off.


As weird as it seems now, Hutton was getting in ahead of him last season and he was third choice for Tottingham overall.  When he arrived, he was making noises about looking to stay. But on making the England squad in Feb ,we pretty much knew they wouldn't be letting him go.  A shame, as we could do with that sort of invention and pace in the side now, particularly with the loss of Young and Downing.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: VillaAlways on January 20, 2012, 11:34:42 AM
Fabian Delph has been signed by Leeds on loan until Feb 25 th
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TheTimVilla on January 20, 2012, 11:35:36 AM
Mark Hughes has agreed a deal to bring defender Taye Taiwo to QPR from AC Milan........according to BBC Sport

Did we not want him at some point?


What happened to our Nigerian trialist right back? Anyone is better than Hutton and Snivels

I thought he was a left back?

Anyway, I heard he wasn't invited for trial after blabbing on his twitter or something.
A Taye Taiwo twitter sounds like a dyslexic owl.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 20, 2012, 11:36:08 AM
Fabian Delph has been signed by Leeds on loan

Apparently its only a 1 month loan ?  I could be wrong
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: VILLA MOLE on January 20, 2012, 11:42:08 AM
A real shame that about Delph when we signed him I thought thats the kind of player we should take a punt on , shows what i know
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: VillaAlways on January 20, 2012, 11:43:04 AM
Fabian Delph has been signed by Leeds on loan

Apparently its only a 1 month loan ?  I could be wrong
Yes til Feb 25th
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 20, 2012, 11:45:15 AM
A real shame that about Delph when we signed him I thought thats the kind of player we should take a punt on , shows what i know

I think we all did, but he hasn't done enough to hold down a place when he's had his chances.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: VILLA MOLE on January 20, 2012, 11:48:07 AM
no but he just does not look confident  at all
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 20, 2012, 11:49:04 AM
I just don't think he is good enough to be honest.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: VILLA MOLE on January 20, 2012, 11:53:49 AM
I just don't think he is good enough to be honest.

sadly yeh but he is in good company on that one
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 20, 2012, 11:55:23 AM
I just don't think he is good enough to be honest.

sadly yeh but he is in good company on that one

I think he would be better off plying his trade in the championship.  Hopefully he will do well out of his loan and we can offload him for some money. I doubt we would ever get the £6m we paid for him back.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ktvillan on January 20, 2012, 11:56:31 AM
Of all the positions in the team, full back is the least likely to win you points. A poor fb can certainly cost you, but I cannot see the marginal difference between say a competent one and a very good one being worth premium money.

Would have to say I disagree with that.

There was a time when that was right, when you could get any jobbing, solid pro and stick him in there.

But in the current game, the best ones are worth their weight in gold. 

The way some teams are set up, the only width they get is from their fullbacks (or wingbacks).    Whilst in other sides, the fullback overlaps with the winger/ wide midfielder  and can cause mayhem down the flanks.  If the player is good enough, this often means the opposition have to focus more on containing the threat rather than attacking themselves.  So you're neutralising their attacking threat into the bargain.


Absolutely KG, an underestimated position. Good FBs give you added solidity at the back and an additional attacking dimension. Mr Rose you normally speak good sense but I have to disagree with your view on Fullbacks.  That could be MON talking.  We overpaid on FBs after Bouma simply because MON wouldn't know a good fullback if Paolo Maldini and Carlos Alberto landed on his head, and secondly because he had the keys to the money box and didn't seem to care how much he wasted on mediocre players.   The one only decent one he signed was Luke Young and even that was over the odds and a year too late. 
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mark H on January 20, 2012, 11:58:36 AM
Fabian Delph has been signed by Leeds on loan

Apparently its only a 1 month loan ?  I could be wrong
Yes til Feb 25th

And we have a recall after the first 28 days of the loan
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: VILLA MOLE on January 20, 2012, 11:59:51 AM
I just don't think he is good enough to be honest.

sadly yeh but he is in good company on that one

I think he would be better off plying his trade in the championship.  Hopefully he will do well out of his loan and we can offload him for some money. I doubt we would ever get the £6m we paid for him back.
I though it was 7 mil but whats a million between friends
 , Dirty Leeds are skint aren't they just in the process of selling their captain to Norwich ?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 20, 2012, 12:03:09 PM
I just don't think he is good enough to be honest.

sadly yeh but he is in good company on that one

I think he would be better off plying his trade in the championship.  Hopefully he will do well out of his loan and we can offload him for some money. I doubt we would ever get the £6m we paid for him back.
I though it was 7 mil but whats a million between friends
 , Dirty Leeds are skint aren't they just in the process of selling their captain to Norwich ?

Who knows hey!? lol!
Ive just read a tweet from Timothy Abrahams of the express and star and he has said that there is an option to extend the deal further.  Im pretty sure this will happen especially with Herd possibly back in the first team fold by then.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: UK Redsox on January 20, 2012, 12:09:32 PM
I just don't think he is good enough to be honest.

He's got Paul Scholes' tackling ability. So he's got that going for him.

Unless Delph's going to be a late developer, I don't think that he's Premiership standard
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: garyshawsknee on January 20, 2012, 12:10:15 PM
I wonder if Mccleish thinks Gardner and Johnson are better players than Delph and he may be sold in the summer.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: IRISHPHIL on January 20, 2012, 12:13:31 PM
delph deal is it for a one month deal, or end of season
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: VillaAlways on January 20, 2012, 12:22:07 PM
delph deal is it for a one month deal, or end of season
The former
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Irreverent ad on January 20, 2012, 12:23:23 PM
delph deal is it for a one month deal, or end of season

Both, potentially.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 20, 2012, 12:35:18 PM
Anybody know what our incoming fee is for the Delph loan? 

I was just thinking that whatever that is, plus the £300k we're due from The ex-Bolton Defender, might mean we have some financial room to bring in a loan player of our own this month?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 20, 2012, 12:38:30 PM
delph deal is it for a one month deal, or end of season

Both, potentially.

There is an option to extend beyond the 28 days
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 20, 2012, 12:50:35 PM
Anybody know what our incoming fee is for the Delph loan? 

I was just thinking that whatever that is, plus the £300k we're due from The ex-Bolton Defender, might mean we have some financial room to bring in a loan player of our own this month?

I do think we will sign one more player this month (most likely a loan signing).  Not sure it will be Craig Gardner though (as the press suggests).  Blues want him back on loan but sunderland have said "NO THANK YOU"
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 20, 2012, 12:56:30 PM
I hope this'll be good for Delph to recover some confidence.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Percy McCarthy on January 20, 2012, 12:57:49 PM
Re: full backs. Stats show that they have more possession than anyone except the centre-mids, so it it quite important to have a couple of good ones.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Merv on January 20, 2012, 01:16:51 PM
I'm still hoping Delph comes good for us. He's actually a talented kid on the ball and going forward - the more defensive role he's been asked to play for us this season hasn't suited him much; it's true that his tackling borders on the reckless at times.

Midfield, then: no Herd or Delph for the next month at least. Jenas already ruled out. We're going with Petrov, Clark, Ireland and Bannan (plus Gardner too, of course) for the next few games. Little bit risky. As John says, maybe there's a chance of a loan deal.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Holte L2 on January 20, 2012, 01:19:07 PM
With Delph going, surely we're bringing somebody in.  Mcleish knows we're down to the bare bones and I can't see Delph going without somebody coming in?

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Irreverent ad on January 20, 2012, 01:26:30 PM
Asked if Delph will be replaced, McLeish replied: "He's only out on a short term basis so it would be difficult to look at replacing him."

Crazy if true!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: N'ZMAV on January 20, 2012, 01:27:54 PM
Knowing McLeish we'll bring in Craig Gardner on loan.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: garyshawsknee on January 20, 2012, 01:28:54 PM
Asked if Delph will be replaced, McLeish replied: "He's only out on a short term basis so it would be difficult to look at replacing him."

Crazy if true!

Thats what makes me think McCleish doesnt rate and will look to offload him in the summer.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Holte L2 on January 20, 2012, 02:24:41 PM
Knowing McLeish we'll bring in Craig Gardner on loan.

I have a horrible feeling too.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulTheVillan on January 20, 2012, 02:25:55 PM
Knowing McLeish we'll bring in Craig Gardner on loan.

Clark CB, Herd RB, Gardner CM.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 20, 2012, 02:30:34 PM
Knowing McLeish we'll bring in Craig Gardner on loan.

Clark CB, Herd RB, Gardner CM.

That may strengthen us at the back, but it'd weaken us in midfield.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pedro25 on January 20, 2012, 03:06:32 PM
Any chance of Makoun coming back?  I only really see Ireland and Bannan as centre mid options in a 3, which means Clark and Petrov staying fit or Gardner really stepping up.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on January 20, 2012, 03:09:37 PM
Gardner is ready to play. But we could do with another.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 20, 2012, 03:23:48 PM
Any chance of Makoun coming back?  I only really see Ireland and Bannan as centre mid options in a 3, which means Clark and Petrov staying fit or Gardner really stepping up.

Makoun is currently injured but will be going back to Olympiacos (spelling ??? ?).  Eck wont call him back anyway as he doesn't rate him and he will most likely be sold off in the summer which is a shame as 7 games to judge a player who has just joined the prem is NOT long enough.  Even british based players have taken their time i.e. Gareth Bale!  Spurs fans didnt rate him when he first joined but now he is a superstar. Makoun needed a good run of games like Delph did to really see what he was made of.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 20, 2012, 03:40:37 PM
I'd like us to give Gardner a go.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dante Lavelli on January 20, 2012, 03:56:36 PM
I cannot see us getting relegated this season, so as far as I'm concerned the more games the likes of Clark, Bannan, Herd and Gardner (even Ireland) get the better.  I think another loan will just restrict their match time which will mean we'll know less about who we need in the summer.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 20, 2012, 04:41:26 PM
Just read on twitter (i know!!) that Enda Stevens maybe joining Watford on loan.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Merv on January 20, 2012, 04:56:23 PM
Makoun is currently injured

Fit again and played the last three Greek Super League games according to the Mail this week. Some quotes from AM about him which didn't sound as if he's in his plans at all.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 20, 2012, 05:03:34 PM
Makoun is currently injured

Fit again and played the last three Greek Super League games according to the Mail this week. Some quotes from AM about him which didn't sound as if he's in his plans at all.

oh ok.  Thought he was still injured but clearly not lol!  Im sure they originally said he was out until Feb? 
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 20, 2012, 05:24:43 PM
We either need to get another loan asap, or bite the bullet and give Gary Gardner some game time pronto in the centre of midfield, because Clark is brilliant, but needed more at left back with Warnock costing us dearly week in week out.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Ian. on January 20, 2012, 05:30:07 PM
When is Warnock's contract up? I can't see anyone actually spending money on him.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Hoppo on January 20, 2012, 05:36:50 PM
End of season 12/13 the same as Dunne and Collins. I for one will be opening the bubbly in The Ads.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 20, 2012, 05:42:28 PM
When is Warnock's contract up? I can't see anyone actually spending money on him.

I would jump at 2 million for him, I reckon MON would pay it.


Genuinely, I would be much happier with Ridgewell in there thank Warnock.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Shrek on January 20, 2012, 05:57:15 PM
When is Warnock's contract up? I can't see anyone actually spending money on him.

I would jump at 2 million for him, I reckon MON would pay it.


Genuinely, I would be much happier with Ridgewell in there thank Warnock.

Exactly what I said last week.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: eamonn on January 20, 2012, 07:08:00 PM
Anybody know what our incoming fee is for the Delph loan? 

I was just thinking that whatever that is, plus the £300k we're due from The ex-Bolton Defender, might mean we have some financial room to bring in a loan player of our own this month?

Incoming fee for Delph?! We'll be lucky if they cover half his wages. I think I read on the Mail that Villa were asking his agent to tout him round for a loan move. Anyway, his wages, full or not, would hardly offset Keane's/Galaxy's fees.

Then again Leeds are selling their captain to Norwich so maybe they need some of that money to cover the cost of Delph.

I still hope he has a future here. If he does it will be as an attacking midfielder or left sided player because he doesn't have the discipline in his tackling and retention to be an anchorman.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on January 20, 2012, 08:11:01 PM
When is Warnock's contract up? I can't see anyone actually spending money on him.

I would jump at 2 million for him, I reckon MON would pay it.


Genuinely, I would be much happier with Ridgewell in there thank Warnock.

or a chair
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Ian. on January 20, 2012, 08:14:58 PM
When is Warnock's contract up? I can't see anyone actually spending money on him.

I would jump at 2 million for him, I reckon MON would pay it.


Genuinely, I would be much happier with Ridgewell in there thank Warnock.

or a chair
Even a chair with two legs
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: timeoutbigbar on January 20, 2012, 11:12:03 PM
When is Warnock's contract up? I can't see anyone actually spending money on him.

I would jump at 2 million for him, I reckon MON would pay it.


Genuinely, I would be much happier with Ridgewell in there thank Warnock.

I don't rate Warnock, but being serious for a moment, We don't have anyone better on the books, and we aren't going to sign anyone better.  He is our best option.

edit: I left out the response on Ridgewell.  Wake up.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Matt C on January 20, 2012, 11:22:46 PM
Ridgewell?! Christ, absence really does make the heart grow fonder.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dave Clark Five on January 20, 2012, 11:33:46 PM
When is Warnock's contract up? I can't see anyone actually spending money on him.

I would jump at 2 million for him, I reckon MON would pay it.


Genuinely, I would be much happier with Ridgewell in there thank Warnock.
Then we could have a player who 'nobody' would like. 
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: luke25 on January 21, 2012, 01:56:08 AM
In other news Sochaux have signed the brilliantly named Yaya Banana.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Matt C on January 21, 2012, 09:13:11 AM
That'll split opinion.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: CJ on January 21, 2012, 11:12:48 AM
Big defender but gets skinned too easily
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: DB on January 21, 2012, 11:14:10 AM
There were a few they were looking at, he was the best of the bunch.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ADVILLAFAN on January 21, 2012, 11:15:01 AM
I've heard he's a slippery customer
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: nuninho on January 21, 2012, 12:16:38 PM
I heard he was no good.  Always standing still apeeling for offside.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Summers on January 21, 2012, 12:34:58 PM
He always pulls out of tackles, he's yellow that lad.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: olaftab on January 21, 2012, 01:53:43 PM
In other news Sochaux have signed the brilliantly named Yaya Banana.

His brother Ripe is more developed.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SashasGrandad on January 21, 2012, 02:06:17 PM
Can he bend it?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: CJ on January 21, 2012, 02:13:02 PM
A representative from Espérance Tunis    confirmed the sale to Sochaux by saying "yes, we have no Banana"



I'll get my coat
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: glasses on January 21, 2012, 06:10:19 PM
I thought Warnock did well today, better than Clark at full back. Got hold of Kightly who didn't get a sniff in the second half. Having no idea what Stevens is like yet, I would say he is the best left back we have, but we do need to replace him. Not with Ridgewell though!!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: villa `cross the mersey on January 21, 2012, 06:17:24 PM
He was on trial with East Fyfees
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: hawkeye on January 21, 2012, 07:24:49 PM
arrived by boat
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 21, 2012, 11:12:04 PM
Warnock did do well today, although 45 minutes on the bench can hopefully sharpen the mind!

The big difference though, Warnock had Albrighton closing and tracking in front of him. Clark had Gabby completely uninterested after 10 minutes in front of him. It helps to have help!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Matt C on January 21, 2012, 11:37:19 PM
Sounds like Gabby wasn't too well to be fair.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 22, 2012, 12:11:47 AM
Sounds like Gabby wasn't too well to be fair.

Then don't declare yourself fit to play an hour before the game! Once you do, if you are not right get off asap, don't play half arsed which is what he did.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: glasses on January 22, 2012, 12:14:01 AM
A fair point Ozzjim. Gabby was poor. Credit to Warnock still though. At times he can be decent, but at other times has been unbelievably pants!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Steve R on January 22, 2012, 08:15:47 AM
I disagree with the start. Great full backs at the top end are the difference between good and brilliant teams at times. Full backs who defend, but equally attack well become secondary wingers, and create a hell of a lot of openings. Walker showed that for us last season, he was a key man.

I wasn't arguing that full backs are irrelevant. As far as Walker goes, I think we've missed him more than Downing or even Ashley Young.

QPR's are not a good team trying to be a great one, nor are we.
Like us (I assume) they have a finite amount of cash they can throw at the squad. Full back is not the right place to throw such a big chunk of that cash in the position they are in.

We spent a big chunk on Shorey and then Warnock. Even if they had turned out to be the useful players they were supposed to be, what would it have done for out top 4 chances had we offered Bouma a new contract and spent the money on Darren Bent instead?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Clampy on January 22, 2012, 11:24:25 AM
Watching the Football League Show last night and the kid making his debut for Coventry Alex Nimely looks like he's going to be a good player. One to keep our eye on me thinks.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on January 22, 2012, 12:55:46 PM
Watching Goals on Sunday (with Jenas) I get the impression a longer stay at Villa is on the cards.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Risso on January 22, 2012, 01:17:14 PM
Watching Goals on Sunday (with Jenas) I get the impression a longer stay at Villa is on the cards.

Who for, Jenas?!  If so, have they never heard of the sayings "once bitten...." or "fool me once....."?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on January 22, 2012, 01:20:15 PM
Watching Goals on Sunday (with Jenas) I get the impression a longer stay at Villa is on the cards.

Who for, Jenas?!  If so, have they never heard of the sayings "once bitten...." or "fool me once....."?

Aye, but I just got the feeling it's on the cards or at least was part of the loan deal agreement.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Risso on January 22, 2012, 01:25:59 PM
Jesus christ I hope not.  It's bad enough that we got conned into paying an injured player's wages for the rest of the season, but if they've signed up to a permanent deal at the end of the season....?  Surely even our board couldn't be that daft?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: UK Redsox on January 22, 2012, 01:54:20 PM

Aye, but I just got the feeling it's on the cards or at least was part of the loan deal agreement.

Maybe the loan deal is "one season" of being available for selection rather than specifically the 2011-12 season.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: barrysleftfoot on January 22, 2012, 03:53:37 PM


  According to the People in the summer, Collins, Cuellar, Heskey and Beye will go in the summer, and McL will get £20m to spend.

  Personally i would let Petrov and Dunne go as well, but probably keep Cuellar.

  Jenas?........only if hes on a free, or very cheap,As Risso said, good footballer, but always injured.Prefer Capoue, or Frimpong or Livermore tbh, or a good cheap one from abroad.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 22, 2012, 03:54:48 PM
  According to the People in the summer, Collins, Cuellar, Heskey and Beye will go in the summer,

That's some amazing journalism by the People, given that Cuellar, Heskey and Beye are all out of contract.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: fredm on January 22, 2012, 04:10:23 PM
Isn't Jenas out of contract at Spurs at the end of the season?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Des Little on January 22, 2012, 04:41:52 PM
We'd better not go for Jenas, unless it's a pay-as-you-play deal.  Once bitten and all that....
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Matt C on January 22, 2012, 05:12:35 PM
Leicester in for the Fonz: http://t.co/3Rs1BC1H
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: VillaAlways on January 22, 2012, 06:19:05 PM
T
Leicester in for the Fonz: http://t.co/3Rs1BC1H
Leicester in for the Fonz: http://t.co/3Rs1BC1H
That would be a good move
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Clampy on January 22, 2012, 07:03:13 PM
  According to the People in the summer, Collins, Cuellar, Heskey and Beye will go in the summer,

That's some amazing journalism by the People, given that Cuellar, Heskey and Beye are all out of contract.

Bearing in mind The People are part of The Mirror (i think), then it all makes sense.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: john e on January 22, 2012, 08:11:16 PM
  According to the People in the summer, Collins, Cuellar, Heskey and Beye will go in the summer,

That's some amazing journalism by the People, given that Cuellar, Heskey and Beye are all out of contract.

Bearing in mind The People are part of The Mirror (i think), then it all makes sense.


they got it about right then, least they arent making it up
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Karl Bridges on January 22, 2012, 08:39:00 PM
We have a 19 year old Jamaican striker called Brian Brown arriving for a 3 week trial, highly rated apparently.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Walmley_Villa on January 22, 2012, 08:41:28 PM
We have a 19 year old Jamaican striker called Brian Brown arriving for a 3 week trial, highly rated apparently.

A new Dwight Yorke???
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: john e on January 22, 2012, 08:46:09 PM
We have a 19 year old Jamaican striker called Brian Brown arriving for a 3 week trial, highly rated apparently.

A new Dwight Yorke???


his name doesnt fit in the New York song so easily though
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Jimmy Smash on January 22, 2012, 08:48:47 PM
We have a 19 year old Jamaican striker called Brian Brown arriving for a 3 week trial, highly rated apparently.

A new Dwight Yorke???


his name doesnt fit in the New York song so easily though

Brian Brown, Brian Brown riding through the glen
Brian Brown, Brian Brown with his merry men... etc.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Ian. on January 22, 2012, 08:50:18 PM
We have a 19 year old Jamaican striker called Brian Brown arriving for a 3 week trial, highly rated apparently.

A new Dwight Yorke???
Hopefully not like Dwight and he can afford his own shin pads as we sure cant afford to buy him a pair
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Matt C on January 22, 2012, 09:10:13 PM
Brian Brown: http://t.co/itguNiWY
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Jimmy Smash on January 22, 2012, 09:15:50 PM
We have a 19 year old Jamaican striker called Brian Brown arriving for a 3 week trial, highly rated apparently.

A new Dwight Yorke???
Hopefully not like Dwight and he can afford his own shin pads as we sure cant afford to buy him a pair

We could afford to buy him a pair... we would just choose not to.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Louzie0 on January 22, 2012, 09:23:59 PM
Exciting news!  Hope he's good and he enjoys himself.  But Jamaica to England in January?  Forget shin pads, he'll have to play in a slanket.  Until FIFA ban them,of course and they go the way of the snood.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 22, 2012, 09:26:03 PM
Hopefully it's on the basis of a bit of international scouting.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on January 22, 2012, 10:36:14 PM
I think this kid's nickname is Rambo. The last one we had was pretty good.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Irish villain on January 22, 2012, 10:55:31 PM
We have a 19 year old Jamaican striker called Brian Brown arriving for a 3 week trial, highly rated apparently.

A new Dwight Yorke???

Exactly my reaction when I read about this kid!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Virgil Caine on January 23, 2012, 09:36:30 AM
What happened to the Spanish/Portugese player who was supposed to be joining us in January who was out of contract at his present club due to some admin cock up on his transfer? Sorry cannot remember his name but it was well reported November/December last year.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: N'ZMAV on January 23, 2012, 09:36:59 AM
How would this Brian Brown get a work permit? How did Yorkie get one?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on January 23, 2012, 09:45:32 AM
I'd like to say I know how it works but I'm not sure anybody does.
There's no rhyme or reason to it at times.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: N'ZMAV on January 23, 2012, 09:46:48 AM
Maybe he's got an Irish Grandmother, Cascarino style...
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 23, 2012, 09:48:23 AM
What happened to the Spanish/Portugese player who was supposed to be joining us in January who was out of contract at his present club due to some admin cock up on his transfer? Sorry cannot remember his name but it was well reported November/December last year.

Was his name Yannick Djalo or something like that?  I think Eck scrapped the idea.  probably got pissed off that he decided to announce it on his faceboook before the club could confirm it?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on January 23, 2012, 09:49:40 AM
The deal fell through when it became known that the lad wanted to be paid.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: N'ZMAV on January 23, 2012, 10:18:16 AM
Pay him in washers.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TimTheVillain on January 23, 2012, 10:47:39 AM
Pay him in washers.

Said Lord Doug as President Emeritus.

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Matt C on January 23, 2012, 12:30:26 PM
Fonz has gone to Leicester for a month: http://t.co/m7P69Sz9
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: godzvilla on January 23, 2012, 12:34:23 PM
We have a 19 year old Jamaican striker called Brian Brown arriving for a 3 week trial, highly rated apparently.

A new Dwight Yorke???

Exactly my reaction when I read about this kid!

Apparently his nickname is ' Rambo ' (?!) ...................Godzvilla
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 23, 2012, 12:41:26 PM
Good luck to the fonz on his loan move to Leicester.

Also, Mat Kendrink has said that there is no truth (according to Villa) about Brian Brown coming to us on trial
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on January 23, 2012, 12:45:53 PM
So consider very mildly exciting chips pissed on.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: The Man With A Stick on January 23, 2012, 01:18:06 PM
Wasn't he in the F/X films, with Brian "straight-to-VHS" Dennehy?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Small Rodent on January 23, 2012, 01:24:45 PM
Wasn't he in the F/X films, with Brian "straight-to-VHS" Dennehy?

He was. He was Hollywood's token Aussie for a while.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: themossman on January 23, 2012, 02:57:44 PM
Was indeed. I was trying to shoe horn in a Cocktail-related work permit joke but it was beyond me.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: olaftab on January 23, 2012, 05:56:12 PM
We have a 19 year old Jamaican striker called Brian Brown arriving for a 3 week trial, highly rated apparently.

A new Dwight Yorke???

New Yorke?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: spangley1812 on January 23, 2012, 06:07:22 PM
BBC Sport understands that Birmingham have agreed a fee with Wigan for winger Jean Beausejour and the Chilean is now set for talks over personal terms.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SoccerHQ on January 23, 2012, 06:15:09 PM
Desperate for the money.

Brausejour will be back playing in the championship next season.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: hawkeye on January 23, 2012, 08:15:02 PM
Fonz on lone to Leicester, i think time is up for the Fonz
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Shrek on January 23, 2012, 09:58:05 PM
Sky Sports reporting we have bid £6million for Scott Dann.

Edit: Well Andy from sky sports is anyway :-s
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 23, 2012, 10:06:55 PM
Can't see it myself, I'd like it to happen but where did we get the money from.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: hawkeye on January 23, 2012, 10:08:00 PM
Sky Sports reporting we have bid £6million for Scott Dann.

Edit: Well Andy from sky sports is anyway :-s
About time we started focusing on the defence, he has been pretty ordinary up there though
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TheSandman on January 23, 2012, 10:10:19 PM
It's odd that Blackburn have been so shit defensively (their goals against column makes horrendous reading) yet their two main centre halves are so highly regarded.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: spangley1812 on January 23, 2012, 10:11:42 PM
It's odd that Blackburn have been so shit defensively (their goals against column makes horrendous reading) yet their two main centre halves are so highly regarded.

I dont think they have played together much in the same team
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 23, 2012, 10:11:50 PM
See Gary Cahill when he was at Bolton for that as well.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: frankmosswasmyuncle on January 23, 2012, 10:15:56 PM
Surprised we didn't go for Dann when he was with Them and they went down. (still love saying that!)
Talking to a Wolves fan today who, after a whinge about Albrighton fouling poor old Karl and Petrov kicking a little boy's head off, said the Villa centre pair were magnificent!
And he wasn't taking the piss!
Can only assume Collins is on his way.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: hawkeye on January 23, 2012, 10:20:12 PM
Surprised we didn't go for Dann when he was with Them and they went down. (still love saying that!)
Talking to a Wolves fan today who, after a whinge about Albrighton fouling poor old Karl and Petrov kicking a little boy's head off, said the Villa centre pair were magnificent!
And he wasn't taking the piss!
Can only assume Collins is on his way.
The second half when they atarted pumping balls into the box Collins and Dunne looked great, remember thier second goal, they took each other out.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Exeter 77 on January 23, 2012, 10:22:07 PM
If the Dann thing is true I think it may be as a replacement for Cuellar.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Jimmy Smash on January 23, 2012, 10:22:54 PM
Can't see it myself, I'd like it to happen but where did we get the money from.

There's a difference between the money not being there and choosing not to spend it.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 23, 2012, 10:26:23 PM
Dann would be a good signing. Young, good organization and has played well for McCliesh before. If Cuellar is off, and Clark increasingly looks more like a holding midfield player or real quality, we need a centre half. With Collins being linked away too, it makes sense. Just need a left back and a right back then.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: hawkeye on January 23, 2012, 10:30:49 PM
It's odd that Blackburn have been so shit defensively (their goals against column makes horrendous reading) yet their two main centre halves are so highly regarded.
Good point, it shows that defence is not just about the 2 centre backs, thuer fullbacks are not world beaters and in front of them there is not much support, a bit like the villa
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: frankmosswasmyuncle on January 23, 2012, 10:32:11 PM
Surprised we didn't go for Dann when he was with Them and they went down. (still love saying that!)
Talking to a Wolves fan today who, after a whinge about Albrighton fouling poor old Karl and Petrov kicking a little boy's head off, said the Villa centre pair were magnificent!
And he wasn't taking the piss!
Can only assume Collins is on his way.
The second half when they atarted pumping balls into the box Collins and Dunne looked great, remember thier second goal, they took each other out.
His words, not mine!
Found it hard to argue with what sounded like a rare compliment about Villa from a Dogs fan!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Grande Pablo on January 23, 2012, 10:48:11 PM
Can't see then letting Dann go if Samba is on his way too.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dave on January 23, 2012, 11:09:01 PM
Can't see then letting Dann go if Samba is on his way too.
If rumours are true then there's a specific clause in his contract allowing him to leave if Blackburn's better players are sold.

Sounds like the sort of mental deal we'd agree to.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: olaftab on January 23, 2012, 11:36:19 PM
I heard from a Blackburn boxholder last Thursday that Dann is coming our way with Dunne moving to Bburn. We pay £2m.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dave on January 23, 2012, 11:46:11 PM
Why would Dunne agree to that?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: villadelph on January 23, 2012, 11:49:43 PM
I heard from a Blackburn boxholder last Thursday that Dann is coming our way with Dunne moving to Bburn. We pay £2m.

what?!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 24, 2012, 12:00:38 AM
Why would Dunne agree to that?

Does he still live in the north west?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: RussellC on January 24, 2012, 12:08:35 AM
Dann's problem is that he never seems to be able to stay fit for longer than 3 games at a time. That would be a crazy move for all parties.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 24, 2012, 12:12:40 AM
Dann's problem is that he never seems to be able to stay fit for longer than 3 games at a time. That would be a crazy move for all parties.

Played 35 games for Small Heath in 2009/10, picked up a bad injury half way through 2010/11, and then had that testicle misfortune at Blackburn (which isn't something you can really ascribe to being injury prone, it's so out of the ordinary)
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 24, 2012, 12:15:09 AM
I hope we sign Dann, it'l be worth it to see a certain poster do a double pirouette over it - from he's ace (the main reason Blues went down being his injury), to he's shit (hence only going to Blackburn), back to he's ace again (he's signed for us).
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: villadelph on January 24, 2012, 12:15:28 AM
I certainly rate Dann higher than Collins.

Collins, Cuellar gone and Fonz on loan.. Three out, someones gotta come in.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on January 24, 2012, 12:41:30 AM
Don't know if other Dann thing is true, but McLeish has never spoken about not have transfer funds.it's always been about wages. We've let Fonz and Delph go, and it wouldn't shock me if we sold Cuellar now also. Dann is an upgrade on Cuellar and Collins so it would be a good deal for the club.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: eamonn on January 24, 2012, 12:43:51 AM
Would Dann pass a medical? His testicles were in ribbons last time I heard.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TheSandman on January 24, 2012, 01:28:59 AM
"Cough please, Mr Dann..."
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: villadelph on January 24, 2012, 03:35:23 AM
Apparently it was just a twitter wind-up.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Hookeysmith on January 24, 2012, 07:52:52 AM
Was Eck not quoted sayimg that when Dann moved to Blackburn he was not worth what they paid for him?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: rutski on January 24, 2012, 08:00:44 AM
I heard from a Blackburn boxholder last Thursday that Dann is coming our way with Dunne moving to Bburn. We pay £2m.

what?!
if it appened then i wood be appy as only got to change 1 letter before i berate him like dunn!!!!! then i cud slag off makleash all game easyer!!!!!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Shrek on January 24, 2012, 10:01:33 AM
Apparently it was just a twitter wind-up.

Yes and I got well and truely duped, sorry guys.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on January 24, 2012, 10:03:32 AM
Good old Twitter. I hope it doesn't go out of business or fatally hacked by teenagers or anything.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 24, 2012, 10:35:56 AM
It may have only been a wind up, but I can see Dann to Villa happening in the summer.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Phil from the upper holte on January 24, 2012, 10:48:30 AM
The fact he was linked with Liverpool & Chelsea and then went to Blackburn speaks volumes
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 24, 2012, 10:52:25 AM
The fact he was linked with Liverpool & Chelsea and then went to Blackburn speaks volumes

That could well have been due to the injury he had.  Or given who Ku Klux Kenny has bought and what he's paid for them, a good sign!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 24, 2012, 11:37:29 AM
I don't normally watch SSN, but have just turned it on, and my word, that Natalie Sawyer has fantastic breasts.

I can see why Eastie loves this channel so much now.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Percy McCarthy on January 24, 2012, 12:06:22 PM
Millie Clode is the prettiest though.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Walmley_Villa on January 24, 2012, 12:30:03 PM
I don't normally watch SSN, but have just turned it on, and my word, that Natalie Sawyer has fantastic breasts.

I can see why Eastie loves this channel so much now.

They make transfer deadline day worth watching - believe me!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on January 24, 2012, 12:38:11 PM
Millie Clode is the prettiest though.

That would be Charlie Webster. With Ms Clode, Hayley McQueen and Kirsty Gallagher close seconds.
Also, the irish bird that looks like she's from the 80s has awesome bewbage.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ADVILLAFAN on January 24, 2012, 12:58:41 PM
I don't normally watch SSN, but have just turned it on, and my word, that Natalie Sawyer has fantastic breasts.

I can see why Eastie loves this channel so much now.

Saw a clip of her on it from 'Soccer Saturday' yonks ago last night. She is a Brentford fan - somehow the fact that she supports a lower league team makes her hotter in my book.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: N'ZMAV on January 24, 2012, 01:02:52 PM
I'd probably bone all the SSN chicks
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: The Laughing Policeman on January 24, 2012, 01:08:36 PM
I'd be happy just to have the energy to do one of them. Ahh the problems of old age.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dave Cooper please on January 24, 2012, 01:24:54 PM
Millie Clode is the prettiest though.

And has a surname that sound vaguely like a euphemism for a vagina.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on January 24, 2012, 01:35:29 PM
"... and she got out of a taxi and I swear you could see her Clode!"
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TheSandman on January 24, 2012, 01:54:30 PM
Was Eck not quoted sayimg that when Dann moved to Blackburn he was not worth what they paid for him?

That was Roger Johnson IIRC. He said that Dann was a fantastic player but he was out of our price range.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: olaftab on January 24, 2012, 02:00:35 PM
Why would Dunne agree to that?
Apparently he wants to limit  the number of games he is selected for as part of his contract and reckons that is more likely at Bburn than Villa.

However  this  and the swap talk could be bollox.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 24, 2012, 02:12:39 PM
Why would Dunne agree to that?
Apparently he wants to limit  the number of games he is selected for as part of his contract and reckons that is more likely at Bburn than Villa.

However  this  and the swap talk could be bollox.

So he wants to get a new contract but then NOT play?

Even in the increasing bizarre world of football, that's a new one on me!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 24, 2012, 02:20:36 PM
Millie Clode is the prettiest though.

That would be Charlie Webster. With Ms Clode, Hayley McQueen and Kirsty Gallagher close seconds.
Also, the irish bird that looks like she's from the 80s has awesome bewbage.

They are all commendable, as is Sarah Jayne Mee.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: The Laughing Policeman on January 24, 2012, 02:24:20 PM
Hmm, all these delightful young ladies. Do they really keep you abreast of things?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 24, 2012, 02:27:45 PM
I don't know, but you get the boobie prize for that joke!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: DB on January 24, 2012, 02:34:06 PM
Irish bird has great norks. Just thought I would echo recent posts....
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 24, 2012, 02:38:56 PM
Norks... chuckle... always makes me giggle....
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: N'ZMAV on January 24, 2012, 02:43:13 PM
Norkus Maximus
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: The Laughing Policeman on January 24, 2012, 02:59:51 PM
Darren Bent Transfer Shock!
At a hastily convened press conference at Villa Park, Darren Bent and manager Alec McLeish joined forces to flatly deny the latest transfer rumour.
Darren Bent reading from a prepared statement said "I'm more than happy to stay where I am and I've nothing more to say on the matter.
Alec McLeish added  "Darren is a very loyal person and I can't see him asking for a transfer."

This latest rumour started when it was thought that e-on had tried to get Darren Bent to transfer to them from npower.
e-on public relations manager Mr. K Dalglish said  "e-on are not a racist company and neither are their customers. Please stop picking on us."
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Phil from the upper holte on January 24, 2012, 03:43:25 PM
I have recently had Virgin media installed and have now got back SSN, It's shit but by christ did I miss Millie Clode
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: luke25 on January 24, 2012, 09:56:15 PM
Zahar, Clyne and Scannell look potentially very good for Palace.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: James on January 24, 2012, 10:43:42 PM
Please control yourselves guys, some of us only have Freeview!

I thought that Whittingham chap was brilliant for City tonight, we should snap him up!

Oh!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 24, 2012, 11:30:43 PM
Rumours this week Clyne is going to Old Trafford for 3 million. They actually need a decent full back, and centre half at the moment
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Irish villain on January 24, 2012, 11:56:01 PM
I'd probably bone all the SSN chicks

This.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: eamonn on January 25, 2012, 12:56:53 AM
SSN babes love Ikea just as much as your other half, don't be titnotized by them.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: UK Redsox on January 25, 2012, 06:58:45 AM
I don't normally watch SSN, but have just turned it on, and my word, that Natalie Sawyer has fantastic breasts.


She's got a bit of the Nigella Lawson's about her
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Hookeysmith on January 25, 2012, 08:01:59 AM
I don't normally watch SSN, but have just turned it on, and my word, that Natalie Sawyer has fantastic breasts.


She's got a bit of the Nigella Lawson's about her
What she is a big fat fucker who can't keep her gob out of the fridge?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on January 25, 2012, 08:14:45 AM
That, and she has epic tittays!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Irish villain on January 25, 2012, 08:56:08 AM
Is there anyway of comparing previous January Speculation threads with this one? We talk about anything but transfers and have reached a miserable 186 pages!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: N'ZMAV on January 25, 2012, 09:00:00 AM
It is all getting rather boring now. Yawn. Are we expecting a MON type 'last minute' madness at the end of the month?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on January 25, 2012, 09:01:27 AM
Nope.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: N'ZMAV on January 25, 2012, 09:03:52 AM
No, neither am I.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: themossman on January 25, 2012, 09:15:25 AM
R
I don't normally watch SSN, but have just turned it on, and my word, that Natalie Sawyer has fantastic breasts.


She's got a bit of the Nigella Lawson's about her
What she is a big fat fucker who can't keep her gob out of the fridge?

Rocks a mean burkhini.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 25, 2012, 10:03:30 AM
SSN babes love Ikea just as much as your other half, don't be titnotized by them.

Brilliant word.

And I still have a sneaking feeling there might be one more incoming deal this window, but don't expect it to be anything to get excited about.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Villanation on January 25, 2012, 10:56:50 AM
Has this been the most uneventful transfer window on record or what? the most exciting things that has happened is Harry Redknapp having a bank account called Rosy, and stashing millions.

That's the England thing gone then, that said, wasn't Cappello also an habitual avoider, allegedly, perhaps its a prerequisite of the job.

CV..........."Right guys lets have a look at the blokes track record" "ah yes" nice little movement out wide there of funds going out the back door" "great tactics" offer him a nice tax free contract then with a huge 5ML severance pay and a 8ML bonus if England win a game,   cough, all tax free of course.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 25, 2012, 11:00:22 AM
That's the England thing gone then, that said, wasn't Cappello also an habitual avoider, allegedly, perhaps its a prerequisite of the job.

It's certainly a pre-requisite of earning decent money and being Italian.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: maidstonevillain on January 25, 2012, 12:24:27 PM
Has this been the most uneventful transfer window on record or what? the most exciting things that has happened is Harry Redknapp having a bank account called Rosy, and stashing millions.



Allegedly
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on January 25, 2012, 01:49:33 PM
have Sky made up any transfer stories today? They must be beside themselves at the lack of activity. Has the "Sky Sports Understands".... ever been used less during a transfer window than this one?

edit: yes, I hate it too. The window should just stay open from July 1st until the last day of January or February and be done with it.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on January 25, 2012, 02:33:07 PM
To be honest, I'm quite happy with it. The transfer circus makes me sick.

Yes, I like speculating on targets and all that like the next man but they've made it into some vulgar sideshow with their pathetic countdown clock/big ben, money totals like it's children in need, twats with mobile phones, Harry fucking Redknapp blabbing to anybody who'll listen and various imbeciles camped outside training grounds with a bunch of desperately ugly chavs milling around behind them screaming some illegible nonsense.

It does honestly make me cringe and want to vomit my ribcage up.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dante Lavelli on January 25, 2012, 02:39:37 PM
Absolutely Maz.  It's vulgar.
Nowadays - I'm officially old - players are pretty much solely rated based on their transfer value whereas their ability to pass/tackle/shoot etc are largely ignored. 
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Vanilla on January 25, 2012, 03:38:45 PM
Absolutely Maz.  It's vulgar.
Nowadays - I'm officially old - players are pretty much solely rated based on their transfer value whereas their ability to pass/tackle/shoot etc are largely ignored.

Certain players indeed do carry their alleged potential and transfer value with them throughout their playing days. This is usually based on a couple of good seasons at the beginning of their careers such as  . . . cough, splutter . . . err . .  Heskey.   
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Colhint on January 25, 2012, 03:45:00 PM
Could it be that Mr Redknapp is otherwise engaged, so no stories or rumours are available
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Salsa Party Animal on January 25, 2012, 05:35:14 PM
Have Man City spend any more on new player this winter ? I think we might have one more deal in 4 millions pounds range coming. But it is boring transfer windows, and African Nations cup will means some team is hanging on their players.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: KevinGage on January 25, 2012, 09:10:19 PM
Could it be that Mr Redknapp is otherwise engaged, so no stories or rumours are available

So this is what transfer windows will be like when 'arry Redknob is dead? 

I could get used to this...
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Malandro on January 25, 2012, 09:56:19 PM
Has this been the most uneventful transfer window on record or what? the most exciting things that has happened is Harry Redknapp having a dead dog called Rosy, and a fairy of a son.



Allegedly

Sick
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 25, 2012, 09:58:57 PM
Has this been the most uneventful transfer window on record or what? the most exciting things that has happened is Harry Redknapp having a dead dog called Rosy, and a fairy of a son.



Allegedly

Sick

Indeed.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Hookeysmith on January 26, 2012, 08:06:41 AM
Has this been the most uneventful transfer window on record or what? the most exciting things that has happened is Harry Redknapp having a dead dog called Rosy, and a fairy of a son.



Allegedly

Sick

Indeed.

Is that sick as in kids speak "good" or the correct term of sick?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Matt C on January 26, 2012, 10:38:37 AM
Link to Ryan Williams at Portsmouth: http://t.co/objRPZWD - 18 year old winger.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: garyshawsknee on January 26, 2012, 10:43:08 AM
I liked the look of Zaha of Palace quite a raw talent but looks like he's got a lot of promise.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TimTheVillain on January 26, 2012, 10:46:07 AM
I liked the look of Zaha of Palace quite a raw talent but looks like he's got a lot of promise.

He reminds me of CN'Zog, he plays in the same way I think.

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Percy McCarthy on January 26, 2012, 10:52:42 AM
Another commendation for Zaha.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 26, 2012, 10:54:04 AM
Link to Ryan Williams at Portsmouth: http://t.co/objRPZWD - 18 year old winger.

Can't say I know much about him, but I can see us entering into lots of deals like this in the near future.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Matt C on January 26, 2012, 11:12:31 AM
And as much as I feel for Portsmouth, nows the time to be looking their way to see if there are any players worth taking.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: garyshawsknee on January 26, 2012, 11:12:38 AM
We can't dine at the top table,so getting younger players from lower leagues or abroad could be the way forward.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 26, 2012, 11:22:40 AM
We can't dine at the top table,so getting younger players from lower leagues or abroad could be the way forward.

Exactly.  I think Spur' recent success can be traced back to a similar policy under Martin Jol where they did deals like buying Lennon from Leeds for £1m.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: N'ZMAV on January 26, 2012, 11:24:41 AM
I quite rate Andy King at Leicester. Decent young-ish Midfielder.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: N'ZMAV on January 26, 2012, 11:36:34 AM
I don't watch much Championship Football these days to know who are the better players in that league to poach and give a go in the Premier League.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: maidstonevillain on January 26, 2012, 12:19:56 PM
I liked the look of Zaha of Palace quite a raw talent but looks like he's got a lot of promise.

Thought Scannel looked better. But in both cases  I thought their final ball/shot was definately Championship standard rather than Premiership standard.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Matt C on January 26, 2012, 12:25:39 PM
Matt Dickinson at The Times reckons Onuoha is on 46k per week 'basic' with up to 12k in bonuses at Man City and in joining QPR is moving onto 60k 'basic' plus bonuses.

Crazy, crazy days.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pedro25 on January 26, 2012, 12:27:29 PM
I'd love us to make a Bid for Hoillett, 8 or 10 mill plus Heskey and Cuellar.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Hookeysmith on January 26, 2012, 12:28:31 PM
Matt Dickinson at The Times reckons Onuoha is on 46k per week 'basic' with up to 12k in bonuses at Man City and in joining QPR is moving onto 60k 'basic' plus bonuses.

Crazy, crazy days.

For a guy who has not had a sniff at 1st team level for what seems ages

Crazy days indeed and just goes to show that no one can compete at that level
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: garyshawsknee on January 26, 2012, 12:28:40 PM
When you see who his agent is,it all makes sense.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dante Lavelli on January 26, 2012, 02:05:09 PM
I'd love us to make a Bid for Hoillett, 8 or 10 mill plus Heskey and Cuellar.

Me too.  Looks a top, top player to me.  Ideal on the left of our attacking three. 
We don't necessarily need someone else there but it's rare that the club has an opportunity to buy someone who is clearly going to be very good.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Irreverent ad on January 26, 2012, 03:24:35 PM
When you see who his agent is,it all makes sense.

It was his mum.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 26, 2012, 03:28:04 PM
I like Hoilett, but I'm not sure the signing makes sense right now.

Excluding Keane, we have 5 very good players for 4 forward spots - Bent, Gabby, Ireland, N'Zogbia and Albrighton.  Plus Bannan and Gardner, who I could see playing further forward.

So, if money is tight, that £8-10m would be better spent on our defence, which is the weak link.

Nothing against the player, just that we need to be sensible unless Randy is opening up the wallet to the extent he used to. 
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dante Lavelli on January 26, 2012, 03:40:14 PM
I like Hoilett, but I'm not sure the signing makes sense right now.

Excluding Keane, we have 5 very good players for 4 forward spots - Bent, Gabby, Ireland, N'Zogbia and Albrighton.  Plus Bannan and Gardner, who I could see playing further forward.

So, if money is tight, that £8-10m would be better spent on our defence, which is the weak link.

Nothing against the player, just that we need to be sensible unless Randy is opening up the wallet to the extent he used to. 

This is just my personal opinion and please don't start the debate again, but I'd take 25m for Bent in order to buy Hoilett (I think he'll be that good).  We'd then have 15m for other players and in my mind a better first 11.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pedro25 on January 26, 2012, 04:14:12 PM
I'd rather sell Gabby than Bent, with the right players around him I think he would be more effective and clinical in the central striker role.  Rather not sell either of them though and I suppose given their scoring records we ought to get more for Bent I suppose. 

The defence is a worry and perhaps should be prioritized I just think with Hoillett if we dont act quickly someone else will snap him up and he will be a very decent player indeed.  A bit like when we signed Ash Young from Watford, you just knew he was going to be very tasty indeed.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Olneythelonely on January 26, 2012, 04:23:59 PM
Gabby would be the last person I'd sell.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Chris Smith on January 26, 2012, 04:31:08 PM
Selling Bent to sign Hoillet means you lose the one player who would benefit most from his signing.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: timeoutbigbar on January 26, 2012, 04:34:00 PM
Is Hoilett in the last year of his contract?  If not then he'd cost more than £10m.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 26, 2012, 04:36:02 PM
There's more Hoillets out there than there are Darren Bents!

The thing is that if we did do that, we'd end up looking for a top striker to put away all the chances were creating.  When you're one piece shy of finsihing a jigsaw you don't swap a piece you have for the one you're missing - you go find the missing piece!

With us we're a few pieces missing in all honesty, and biggest one right now is a solid defence.   
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: James on January 26, 2012, 04:55:39 PM
Hoilett is out of contract in the summer, so the sensible thing to do would be to sign him up on a pre-contract now and get him on a Bosman once the three players we have taking chunks out of our wage bill have left, however, being Villa....
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pedro25 on January 26, 2012, 04:55:45 PM
Bent was our missing piece, I'm certain his addition to MO'N's champions league chasing team would have seen us firmly establish ourselves in the top 4, but he signed Heskey and gradually the rest of the team was firmly broken up and sold on.  Bent came too late for us, Milner and Barry had already gone and Young and Downing were to follow.  Just think what a team like this could have done, Friedel, Young, Mellberg, Laursen, Bouma, Young, Milner, Barry, Downing, Gabby, Bent, with Carew, Petrov, Cahill etc on the bench.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SteveN on January 26, 2012, 05:15:45 PM
I'm not convinced that Hoilett is any better than Matt Phillips at Blackpool who, I suspect, would cost less and demand less in wages.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Matt C on January 26, 2012, 05:31:55 PM
Hoilett will still command a fee in the summer via tribunal plus he'll be looking for the biggest contract of his career so can't see him being too cheap.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TheSandman on January 26, 2012, 05:37:17 PM
And he'll go to Spurs too to add to their vast collection of promising attacking players with dubious end product.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dave on January 26, 2012, 05:47:52 PM
Hoilett is out of contract in the summer, so the sensible thing to do would be to sign him up on a pre-contract now and get him on a Bosman once the three players we have taking chunks out of our wage bill have left, however, being Villa....
That would be sensible, if we were allowed to do it.

Which we're not.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: barrysleftfoot on January 26, 2012, 06:52:51 PM


  I thought players who were out of contract in the summer were allowed to "talk" to other clubs in Jan.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: cdbearsfan on January 26, 2012, 06:58:45 PM


  I thought players who were out of contract in the summer were allowed to "talk" to other clubs in Jan.

Only clubs in a different country. They're not allowed to talk to clubs in the same country till the contract expires. Although I doubt very much that certain managers bother adhering to that rule.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: phantom limb on January 26, 2012, 08:06:43 PM
Anyone else seen this? Old habits die hard I guess.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2012/jan/26/sunderland-kevin-davies-bolton
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Jimmy Smash on January 26, 2012, 08:54:47 PM
Anyone else seen this? Old habits die hard I guess.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2012/jan/26/sunderland-kevin-davies-bolton

He could have Heskey... or is he just being vindictive?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SoccerHQ on January 26, 2012, 09:00:08 PM
Matt Dickinson at The Times reckons Onuoha is on 46k per week 'basic' with up to 12k in bonuses at Man City and in joining QPR is moving onto 60k 'basic' plus bonuses.

Crazy, crazy days.

For a guy who has not had a sniff at 1st team level for what seems ages

Crazy days indeed and just goes to show that no one can compete at that level

Yep and Onouha was one I thought we could realistically sign!

I think he was having doubts about moving to London so QPR have probably raised his salary a bit more.

Given they're signing all these full backs, can we have Luke Young back?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on January 26, 2012, 09:32:41 PM
Fuck Luke Young. I dont know why there is so much clamour for his return. Never more than decent and he wanted to go.
If Hutton is to be replaced then I'd sooner give Lichaj and Herd the chance.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Clampy on January 26, 2012, 09:43:12 PM
I liked Young. The defence always seemed a bit more solid when he was playing. I'd have him back, he'd be useful on the left.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Grande Pablo on January 26, 2012, 10:10:44 PM
Looks like Lowry is going to Millwall permanently - I thought he looked a pretty decent prospect.

http://www1.skysports.com/football/news/11735/7458105/Lions-working-on-Lowry-deal
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: KevinGage on January 26, 2012, 10:26:38 PM
I liked Young. The defence always seemed a bit more solid when he was playing. I'd have him back, he'd be useful on the left.

I liked him too.

He was one of the better right (and on occasion left) backs we've had in the last 15/20 years.   But as Maz said, he wanted out. 

We didn't push him out.

He wanted to get back to London since at least 2010. And maybe before that.  So whilst I won't slag Luke Young the player, I'm always a bit wary of multi million pound footballers who plead homesickness -despite only working an hour and a half up the road.

They have usually have day off during the week, are only in for 2/3 hours when they are actually at BH (including a meal)  and usually have a fair chunk of the weekend still free after the game. Plenty of time, you'd have thought, to get back to London if the really miss it that much.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: DrGonzo on January 26, 2012, 10:44:21 PM
I'm annoyed that we missed out on Onouha, I think he'd have filled the hole that Cuellar is going to leave in the squad.  I think the only way forward now with the financial restrictions is to try and build a squad of 17-24 year olds with potential and then weed out the wastrels.  We need a strong youth scouting network in the European leagues and more investment in our youth system.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 27, 2012, 12:03:14 AM
Young is solid and dependable. Hutton is largely frightening.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Summers on January 27, 2012, 12:07:38 AM
I'm annoyed that we missed out on Onouha, I think he'd have filled the hole that Cuellar is going to leave in the squad.  I think the only way forward now with the financial restrictions is to try and build a squad of 17-24 year olds with potential and then weed out the wastrels.  We need a strong youth scouting network in the European leagues and more investment in our youth system.

Onohua is nowhere near worth the wage he's earning. I'm glad we're not paying it. More fool QPR.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: eamonn on January 27, 2012, 12:27:02 AM
Onouha being on the much money, if true, is horrific. That Kia Ora agent fella is either brilliant at his job or more bent than 'arry.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 27, 2012, 12:36:55 AM
Onouha being on the much money, if true, is horrific. That Kia Ora agent fella is either brilliant at his job or more bent than 'arry.

The reason he's getting that kind of deal us because players need a lot of convincing to join a small club that will very possibly go down.

It is the same reason someone like Aguero gets paid more by Man City than he would at bigger clubs elsewhere in Europe. Say, Milan or City, same money, it's Milan every time. Thrw another 50k on top every week and it's Man City.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dante Lavelli on January 27, 2012, 12:42:11 AM
Onouha being on the much money, if true, is horrific. That Kia Ora agent fella is either brilliant at his job or more bent than 'arry.

The reason he's getting that kind of deal us because players need a lot of convincing to join a small club that will very possibly go down.

It is the same reason someone like Aguero gets paid more by Man City than he would at bigger clubs elsewhere in Europe. Say, Milan or City, same money, it's Milan every time. Thrw another 50k on top every week and it's Man City.

True but I don't think they will have to for much longer.  I doubt there is a more nailed on chumps league qualifier out there.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: eamonn on January 27, 2012, 01:17:26 AM
QPR and Man City being our overlords. Who ever would have thought it?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on January 27, 2012, 02:17:25 AM
QPR and Man City being our overlords. Who ever would have thought it?

Are they fuck. When combined they've won close to what we've won in our wonderful history I might give a shit about their existence. They'll need to do a lot in the game for a significant period of time to be anything close to who we are. Don't let Sky convince you otherwise.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: VancouverLion on January 27, 2012, 03:25:31 AM
QPR and Man City being our overlords. Who ever would have thought it?

Are they fuck. When combined they've won close to what we've won in our wonderful history I might give a shit about their existence. They'll need to do a lot in the game for a significant period of time to be anything close to who we are. Don't let Sky convince you otherwise.

Here Here TV!! Like it!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: andrew08 on January 27, 2012, 08:12:15 AM
Why are QPR our overlords ? I don't understand.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Clampy on January 27, 2012, 08:21:28 AM
Pavel Pogrebnyak, the Stuttgart striker being linked with Albion is an interesting one. He's scored goals wherever he's been. Not sure we need another striker at the moment, but when Keane goes we will do. It would also give us chance to send Wiemann out on loan.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: eastie on January 27, 2012, 08:42:57 AM
Young is solid and dependable. Hutton is largely frightening.
This.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: eastie on January 27, 2012, 08:46:40 AM
QPR and Man City being our overlords. Who ever would have thought it?

Are they fuck. When combined they've won close to what we've won in our wonderful history I might give a shit about their existence. They'll need to do a lot in the game for a significant period of time to be anything close to who we are. Don't let Sky convince you otherwise.

Who we were ,you mean , the game and times have changed and we are no longer one of the the big boys in the present times.

Stand still and teams will fly past us and that is sadly the situation we are now in, an also ran, just making up the numbers and happy to survive in the premier league .
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: N'ZMAV on January 27, 2012, 08:48:16 AM
Fuck Luke Young. I dont know why there is so much clamour for his return. Never more than decent and he wanted to go.
If Hutton is to be replaced then I'd sooner give Lichaj and Herd the chance.
I also think that about Luke Young, I get the impression he never really wanted to be here. And he jumped ship when he got chance. Fair play, he had a lot to deal with after his step-bro died.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pedro25 on January 27, 2012, 09:19:12 AM
Young was solid, but watching Villa over the last 20 years I'd have him behind Barrett, Nelson, Charles, Delaney and Walker as my favourite right backs.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Merv on January 27, 2012, 09:49:45 AM
Onohua is nowhere near worth the wage he's earning. I'm glad we're not paying it. More fool QPR.

Dickinson came back on later in the day to correct himself - Onohua's on a smaller basic at QPR than he was at City.

I liked Luke Young too, rarely let us down. But I do think Lichaj has more than enough about him to be our first choice RB.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 27, 2012, 09:55:56 AM
I liked Luke Young, but in truth he was nothing special and a bit of a journey man pro.

I'm probably in the minority on this one, but I'm expecting better things from Hutton in the latter half of the season. 
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: asgpaul on January 27, 2012, 09:58:16 AM
Young is solid and dependable. Hutton is largely frightening.

Couldn't agree more, it used to frustrate me senseless that we had Carlos playing RB with Young on the bench, now I'd happily have Carlos at RB with Hutton on the bench! 
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: garyshawsknee on January 27, 2012, 10:29:49 AM
Young was solid, but watching Villa over the last 20 years I'd have him behind Barrett, Nelson, Charles, Delaney and Walker as my favourite right backs.

I think you're being generous to Charles and Nelson.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: bob on January 27, 2012, 10:32:24 AM
Why are QPR our overlords ? I don't understand.

He quite obviously is referring to the amount of money they have.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: andrew08 on January 27, 2012, 10:50:34 AM
Why are QPR our overlords ? I don't understand.

He quite obviously is referring to the amount of money they have.

I actually understood that but I hadn't noticed them making Man City type signings or pinching ours and Arsenals best players.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Irish villain on January 27, 2012, 11:01:34 AM
Young was solid, but watching Villa over the last 20 years I'd have him behind Barrett, Nelson, Charles, Delaney and Walker as my favourite right backs.

I think you're being generous to Charles and Nelson.

Very generous. I'd rate Young better than them both and probably about the level of Delaney with a bit more versatility. Luke Young was decent going forward and scored a couple of nice goals in his time here. I was sad to see him go and think we're weaker in that position now.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on January 27, 2012, 11:17:43 AM
Young is nowhere near the level Charles was for us. Or Delaney for that matter.
Hutton is in terrible form and Luke Young would get in ahead of him at the moment but I find the level of praise versus talent that Young is getting quite astonishing.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Merv on January 27, 2012, 11:22:02 AM
I thought Gary Charles was great for us. One of my fave Villa RBs.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: N'ZMAV on January 27, 2012, 11:23:59 AM
We haven't had a top quality right back for years and years.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: garyshawsknee on January 27, 2012, 11:24:27 AM
I always thought Charles was a poor defender,never got close to opponents,always let them get crosses in. Nelson was average,Young was always steady,never made too many errors. Is have him behind Delaney and Walker.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: N'ZMAV on January 27, 2012, 11:30:01 AM
Walker was the best right back we've probably had since the start of the Premier League, then Young, then Delaney.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 27, 2012, 11:33:09 AM
Walker was the best right back we've probably had since the start of the Premier League, then Young, then Delaney.

Don't agree with that.

Walker was great going forward and had fantastic pace, but he was too iffy defensively to claim that honour, in my opinion.

He's young, though, and will doubtless get better.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulTheVillan on January 27, 2012, 11:33:52 AM
Steve Stone played wing back a few times ;D
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: spangley1812 on January 27, 2012, 11:34:27 AM
Walker was the best right back we've probably had since the start of the Premier League, then Young, then Delaney.

Don't agree with that.

Walker was great going forward and had fantastic pace, but he was too iffy defensively to claim that honour, in my opinion.

He's young, though, and will doubtless get better.

I agree going forward very good but some of his defensive/positional play was very poor
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: N'ZMAV on January 27, 2012, 11:35:16 AM
Walker will be excellent in a few years, will surely get better, especially in that Spurs side.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: N'ZMAV on January 27, 2012, 11:35:40 AM
Walker was the best right back we've probably had since the start of the Premier League, then Young, then Delaney.

Don't agree with that.

Walker was great going forward and had fantastic pace, but he was too iffy defensively to claim that honour, in my opinion.

He's young, though, and will doubtless get better.

I agree going forward very good but some of his defensive/positional play was very poor
He wasn't the finished article, but we've not had a right back that is.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: KevinGage on January 27, 2012, 11:41:48 AM
Walker was the best right back we've probably had since the start of the Premier League, then Young, then Delaney.

Don't agree with that.

Walker was great going forward and had fantastic pace, but he was too iffy defensively to claim that honour, in my opinion.

He's young, though, and will doubtless get better.

Agreed Paulie.

He looks like he has the makings of an excellent allround player.  But even during his short stint with us, he looked suspect defensively.

I'd have Luke Young second only to Delaney, based on ability, consistency and actual contribution to us over an extended period of time. Even if Walker will -most likely- go on to be a far better player.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Hoppo on January 27, 2012, 11:43:39 AM
Charles..? Id rather have Craig Charles in fact he has just left Corrie! I did think UEFA's statement about finance would have got people on here talking more. It seems Villa are doing things the right way in the long term. I just hope the Mr McLeish has let his guard down for good and if its going to be stability for a couple of seasons we do it with an attacking mind.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on January 27, 2012, 11:55:03 AM
Defensively, I think Earl Barret.  He played at a time when there was less emphasis on a fullback getting forward, so was excellent in our best PL era side.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Hoppo on January 27, 2012, 11:57:58 AM
As this is the transfer rumour thread. Were being linked with Rhys Williams young winger from Pompey and a Douglas a highly rated centre half who plays for FC Twente.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Irish villain on January 27, 2012, 12:22:01 PM
As this is the transfer rumour thread. Were being linked with Rhys Williams young winger from Pompey and a Douglas a highly rated centre half who plays for FC Twente.

Two more bodies (with potential) would be good for where we are now.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pedro25 on January 27, 2012, 01:04:45 PM
"You'll never beat Earl Barrett"!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ADVILLAFAN on January 27, 2012, 01:28:35 PM
Walker was the best right back we've probably had since the start of the Premier League, then Young, then Delaney.

Don't agree with that.

Walker was great going forward and had fantastic pace, but he was too iffy defensively to claim that honour, in my opinion.

He's young, though, and will doubtless get better.

Didier Agathe?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Irreverent ad on January 27, 2012, 01:38:05 PM
From Today's press conference:

Reporter: "Alex, what business are you looking at doing before the transfer deadline?" McLeish: "Nothing."
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dave on January 27, 2012, 01:39:55 PM
I think we knew that anyway didn't we?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: N'ZMAV on January 27, 2012, 01:40:38 PM
FFS
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 27, 2012, 01:44:23 PM
I think Walker was as responsible for our second half of the season up turn as Bent though. Going forward he was a beast, and it is not something he seems as licensed to do at Spurs. I really miss watching him play,
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: N'ZMAV on January 27, 2012, 01:47:44 PM
He'd have learnt a lot from 6 Months under Houllier.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on January 27, 2012, 02:12:14 PM
FFS

Don't be shocked or upset. I think McLeish's answer is the same as every other manager with possibly the exception of Hughes. This has been by far the worst transfer window ever.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dante Lavelli on January 27, 2012, 03:05:37 PM
FFS

Don't be shocked or upset. I think McLeish's answer is the same as every other manager with possibly the exception of Hughes. This has been by far the worst transfer window ever.

Worst?  Or best?  The sooner football becomes less about football mercenaries moving for big money and begins to be about clubs being built from the bottom up the better.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on January 27, 2012, 03:06:17 PM
FFS

Don't be shocked or upset. I think McLeish's answer is the same as every other manager with possibly the exception of Hughes. This has been by far the worst transfer window ever.

Worst?  Or best?  The sooner football becomes less about football mercenaries moving for big money and begins to be about clubs being built from the bottom up the better.

yes, you can certainly argue it both ways
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Chris Smith on January 27, 2012, 03:10:22 PM
He'd have learnt a lot from 6 Months under Houllier.

About two months, he was off sick for most of it.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on January 27, 2012, 03:18:32 PM
QPR and Man City being our overlords. Who ever would have thought it?

Are they fuck. When combined they've won close to what we've won in our wonderful history I might give a shit about their existence. They'll need to do a lot in the game for a significant period of time to be anything close to who we are. Don't let Sky convince you otherwise.

Who we were ,you mean , the game and times have changed and we are no longer one of the the big boys in the present times.

Stand still and teams will fly past us and that is sadly the situation we are now in, an also ran, just making up the numbers and happy to survive in the premier league .

football changes all the time. What never changes is what you've acheived and one's standing in the game beyond the game itself. Man City are today's Chelsea. Tomorrow there will be someone else. The true established teams have a rich history, and just because we aren't great today doesn't mean we can't be again. Today's new fans only ever give a shit about the moment, and TV will stress that because they don't have the energy or desire to deal with history. They jump on board whatever wagon is is moving the fastest and jump off as soon as the wheels come off.

But we are certainly not under Man City or QPR in anything.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: VillaAlways on January 27, 2012, 04:58:44 PM
Shane Lowry joins Millwall on a permanent deal
http://www.avfc.co.uk/page/NewsDetail/0,,10265~2590836,00.html
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TheSandman on January 27, 2012, 05:05:02 PM
Best of luck to him, blunt as it may seem but he wasn't going to make it with us.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 27, 2012, 05:09:38 PM
No great loss really.  wish him all the best though
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on January 27, 2012, 05:59:16 PM
He's a good solid player who might do O.K in the premier league someday. Or a good championship team.
I also wish him well.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: WALTERS WARRIORS on January 27, 2012, 08:44:54 PM
Lowry was a good young pro who will probably make a living in the championship. Good luck to him .......
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: adrenachrome on January 27, 2012, 11:37:15 PM
Daily Heil


Quote
Villa eyeing loan deal for Malaga battering ram Rondon as Heskey replacement


By Sportsmail Reporter

Last updated at 10:23 PM on 27th January 2012


Aston Villa manager Alex McLeish is exploring the possibility of a loan deal for Malaga striker José Salomón Rondon.

The exciting 22-year-old Venezuela international has a record of a goal every three games for his club.

And his powerful performances have caught the eye of the Villa boss this term as he looks for a strong frontman to replace Emile Heskey.

At 6ft 3in Rondon fits the bill and the five goals he has scored in 21 games for his country.


Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: eamonn on January 28, 2012, 01:48:28 AM
What do you reckon the fee was for Lowry? Yeah, I'm asking you.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dante Lavelli on January 28, 2012, 02:14:03 AM
100k is my guess, but I have absolutely no idea.
Still good for the youth set up.  Pretty much all profit and that'll do for me.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 28, 2012, 02:18:12 AM
I reckon Lowry will do a Scott Murray. Make a living and have a decent career in Division 2 or 3 but never be good enough to do much more. Good luck to the fella though.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pooligan on January 28, 2012, 07:50:11 AM
Lowry in the same mould as Hogg,decent championship player but not quite good enough for the Premier. Wish him well though,always gave everything he had when i saw him play in the Reserves and Youth team.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: UK Redsox on January 28, 2012, 11:12:21 AM
Daily Heil


Quote
Villa eyeing loan deal for Malaga battering ram Rondon as Heskey replacement


By Sportsmail Reporter

Last updated at 10:23 PM on 27th January 2012


Aston Villa manager Alex McLeish is exploring the possibility of a loan deal for Malaga striker José Salomón Rondon.

The exciting 22-year-old Venezuela international has a record of a goal every three games for his club.

And his powerful performances have caught the eye of the Villa boss this term as he looks for a strong frontman to replace Emile Heskey.

At 6ft 3in Rondon fits the bill and the five goals he has scored in 21 games for his country.




Sounds like a good idea.

As much as some might dislike the way that Emile plays, we do need a big bloke on the bench as a "plan B"
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on January 28, 2012, 11:22:51 AM
I'm not a fan of buying a striker simply because he's big. Of course if he's a good player and also has that dimension then great.
Sometimes it makes you focus on hoofing the ball up to him.

We certainly dont have a target man type striker at the club but we have strong forwards who like the ball on the deck.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: glasses on January 28, 2012, 12:40:34 PM
Daily Heil


Quote
Villa eyeing loan deal for Malaga battering ram Rondon as Heskey replacement


By Sportsmail Reporter

Last updated at 10:23 PM on 27th January 2012


Aston Villa manager Alex McLeish is exploring the possibility of a loan deal for Malaga striker José Salomón Rondon.

The exciting 22-year-old Venezuela international has a record of a goal every three games for his club.

And his powerful performances have caught the eye of the Villa boss this term as he looks for a strong frontman to replace Emile Heskey.

At 6ft 3in Rondon fits the bill and the five goals he has scored in 21 games for his country.




Sounds like a good idea.

As much as some might dislike the way that Emile plays, we do need a big bloke on the bench as a "plan B"
Using that logic, lets take Nikola Zigic from the Blues.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: KevinGage on January 28, 2012, 12:48:28 PM
Daily Heil


Quote
Villa eyeing loan deal for Malaga battering ram Rondon as Heskey replacement


By Sportsmail Reporter

Last updated at 10:23 PM on 27th January 2012


Aston Villa manager Alex McLeish is exploring the possibility of a loan deal for Malaga striker José Salomón Rondon.

The exciting 22-year-old Venezuela international has a record of a goal every three games for his club.

And his powerful performances have caught the eye of the Villa boss this term as he looks for a strong frontman to replace Emile Heskey.

At 6ft 3in Rondon fits the bill and the five goals he has scored in 21 games for his country.




Seen a bit of him last year and thought he looked useful, the kind of player who -whilst not a world beater- could do well in the Prem.

Would have thought they'd be looking for a big fee.  But seeing as (a) he's behind Van Horseyboy and Julio Baptista and (b) Malaga are now the Man Citeh of Spain, maybe they're not fussed about such trifling matters.

Would only be interested if it's a loan with a view to buy though.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: mjlions on January 28, 2012, 01:42:27 PM
What do you reckon the fee was for Lowry? Yeah, I'm asking you.

TweetMatKendrickMat Kendrick



 

Best wishes to #avfc defender Shane Lowry who has joined Millwall permanently (well for 2.5 years) for a fee potentially rising to £250,000.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Jimmy Smash on January 28, 2012, 06:12:58 PM
Daily Heil


Quote
Villa eyeing loan deal for Malaga battering ram Rondon as Heskey replacement

You could hardly describe Heskey as a battering ram. Carew, maybe... but Heskey?

By Sportsmail Reporter

Last updated at 10:23 PM on 27th January 2012


Aston Villa manager Alex McLeish is exploring the possibility of a loan deal for Malaga striker José Salomón Rondon.

The exciting 22-year-old Venezuela international has a record of a goal every three games for his club.

And his powerful performances have caught the eye of the Villa boss this term as he looks for a strong frontman to replace Emile Heskey.

At 6ft 3in Rondon fits the bill and the five goals he has scored in 21 games for his country.




Seen a bit of him last year and thought he looked useful, the kind of player who -whilst not a world beater- could do well in the Prem.

Would have thought they'd be looking for a big fee.  But seeing as (a) he's behind Van Horseyboy and Julio Baptista and (b) Malaga are now the Man Citeh of Spain, maybe they're not fussed about such trifling matters.

Would only be interested if it's a loan with a view to buy though.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SoccerHQ on January 28, 2012, 06:44:28 PM
QPR and Man City being our overlords. Who ever would have thought it?

QPR will just be another West Ham I think. I really can't see them being a major force in the game.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SoccerHQ on January 28, 2012, 06:58:47 PM
Rondon's goal record in La Liga isn't far off 1 in 2 which gives an indication he'd be a better option than Heskey.

And Venezuela are my favourite national team at the minute, they have a great crop of young players in their squad and I think they'll make the next world cup so would expect 1 or 2 to pop up in the prem.

Surprised if Malaga left him go this window.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: john e on January 28, 2012, 07:11:00 PM
QPR and Man City being our overlords. Who ever would have thought it?

QPR will just be another West Ham I think. I really can't see them being a major force in the game.


i thought that about Chelsea when Abramovich took over,
 the club itself is irelavent, money is the major force in football today, if you have it and spend it you will be a force, thats the way it works now i'm afraid
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TheSandman on January 28, 2012, 07:36:08 PM
Who have QPR bought? An couple of reasonable full-backs and that is it. I do not see Fernandes bankrolling them to the extent of a Chelsea or Man City. They will be one of the teams slogging it out with us for midtable.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: john e on January 28, 2012, 07:41:18 PM
Who have QPR bought? An couple of reasonable full-backs and that is it. I do not see Fernandes bankrolling them to the extent of a Chelsea or Man City. They will be one of the teams slogging it out with us for midtable.


if they dont spend then they wont be a force, if they do they will, simple as that
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 28, 2012, 08:03:54 PM
Who have QPR bought? An couple of reasonable full-backs and that is it. I do not see Fernandes bankrolling them to the extent of a Chelsea or Man City. They will be one of the teams slogging it out with us for midtable.

Fernandes is nowhere near as rich as Abramovich.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dante Lavelli on January 28, 2012, 09:11:25 PM
QPR would really struggle with the FFP rules as their ground is so small.  So even if Fernandez is willing to splash the cash it will be very hard for them to take the leaps forward that Chelsea and city have.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Steve R on January 28, 2012, 09:59:47 PM
Who have QPR bought? An couple of reasonable full-backs and that is it. I do not see Fernandes bankrolling them to the extent of a Chelsea or Man City. They will be one of the teams slogging it out with us for midtable.

Fernandes is nowhere near as rich as Abramovich.

Or Randy Lerner, I believe.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: villadelph on January 28, 2012, 10:18:54 PM
Who have QPR bought? An couple of reasonable full-backs and that is it. I do not see Fernandes bankrolling them to the extent of a Chelsea or Man City. They will be one of the teams slogging it out with us for midtable.


Fernandes is nowhere near as rich as Abramovich.

Or Randy Lerner, I believe.

2010 Forbes listed his value at $330mil. Not even close to Lerner ($1.1bil) let alone Abramovich.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SoccerHQ on January 28, 2012, 11:11:02 PM
It's similar to when Egghead and the Icelandic lot took over West Ham and signed the likes of Ljungberg, Kieron Dyer, Lucas Neill, Boa Morte etc on ridiculous wages and contracts.

They finished mid table and eventually got relegated, the same will happen at QPR.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SoccerHQ on January 28, 2012, 11:15:34 PM
QPR and Man City being our overlords. Who ever would have thought it?

QPR will just be another West Ham I think. I really can't see them being a major force in the game.


i thought that about Chelsea when Abramovich took over,
 the club itself is irelavent, money is the major force in football today, if you have it and spend it you will be a force, thats the way it works now i'm afraid

Chelsea had won two FA cups, a league and european cup winners cup in the five years before Abramovich took over, reached the champions league quarters in 2000 and had competed for a couple of league titles.

They'd also signed good foreign players like Zola, Desailly, Hasselbaink so were already an attraction abroad.

Better comparison would be with Man. City but Tony Fernandes is no Sheikh is he?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 29, 2012, 12:00:03 AM
Liverpool contacted Man City and offered Caroll for Tevez in a straight swap.

I might call Brad Pitt and offer my mother in law for Angelina.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Percy McCarthy on January 29, 2012, 12:57:12 AM
Liverpool contacted me and offered Caroll for my mother-in-law. It only fell through when they realised she was black.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 29, 2012, 01:00:58 AM
Liverpool contacted me and offered Caroll for my mother-in-law. It only fell through when they realised she was black.

*applause*
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Percy McCarthy on January 29, 2012, 01:05:40 AM
Reciprocated. Yours was a good un.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: adrenachrome on January 29, 2012, 03:12:48 AM
Philly Soccer News (http://www.phillysoccernews.com/teams/union2.php?article_id=8070)
Quote
January 28, 2012
QUICK SPIN
Mwanga training with Aston Villa for 10 days

CHESTER, Pa. - Philadelphia Union forward Danny Mwanga has embarked for a 10-day training stint with Barclay’s English Premier League side Aston Villa. He will join his teammates in Orlando on February 6, in time for the start of the Union’s second leg of preseason.

The Union selected Mwanga as a Generation adidas signee with the first overall selection in the 2010 MLS SuperDraft, the first draft pick in club history. After starting the first-ever match in Union history in Seattle on March 25, Mwanga finished his rookie season with seven goals and four assists and was a Rookie of the Year finalist. Mwanga battled minor injuries during his sophomore campaign but finished the season with five goals and four assists 28 matches.

Aston Villa sit in 11th place in the Premier League standings and feature USMNT goalkeeper Brad Guzan and striker Robbie Keane, currently on a six-week loan from the LA Galaxy.

Mwanga is the seventh member of the Union to train abroad this offseason. Midfielder Freddy Adu joined La Liga side Rayo Vallecano, goalkeeper Zac MacMath trained alongside Tim Howard at Everton, Amobi Okugo trained with Bundesliga side SC Freiburgand, 16-year-old Zach Pfeffer trained with Bundesliga side Hoffenheim, Michael Farfan spent two weeks with Sunderland and Sebastien Le Toux recently returned from Bolton.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dante Lavelli on January 29, 2012, 03:37:22 AM
Philly Soccer News (http://www.phillysoccernews.com/teams/union2.php?article_id=8070)
Quote
January 28, 2012
QUICK SPIN
Mwanga training with Aston Villa for 10 days

CHESTER, Pa. - Philadelphia Union forward Danny Mwanga has embarked for a 10-day training stint with Barclay’s English Premier League side Aston Villa. He will join his teammates in Orlando on February 6, in time for the start of the Union’s second leg of preseason.

The Union selected Mwanga as a Generation adidas signee with the first overall selection in the 2010 MLS SuperDraft, the first draft pick in club history. After starting the first-ever match in Union history in Seattle on March 25, Mwanga finished his rookie season with seven goals and four assists and was a Rookie of the Year finalist. Mwanga battled minor injuries during his sophomore campaign but finished the season with five goals and four assists 28 matches.

Aston Villa sit in 11th place in the Premier League standings and feature USMNT goalkeeper Brad Guzan and striker Robbie Keane, currently on a six-week loan from the LA Galaxy.

Mwanga is the seventh member of the Union to train abroad this offseason. Midfielder Freddy Adu joined La Liga side Rayo Vallecano, goalkeeper Zac MacMath trained alongside Tim Howard at Everton, Amobi Okugo trained with Bundesliga side SC Freiburgand, 16-year-old Zach Pfeffer trained with Bundesliga side Hoffenheim, Michael Farfan spent two weeks with Sunderland and Sebastien Le Toux recently returned from Bolton.

This is a another good idea from AMc (or his coaching team).  There are already some good players coming out of the MLS and these training/trial deals mean we can have a good look at them.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: godzvilla on January 29, 2012, 04:33:52 AM
Who else is currently training with us ? .....there was / is a Jamaican ( Rambo ) , an African  ( Nigerian ?) Full Back and now this guy Mwango . It would be nice to know , from Club sources how they progress , or not , as the case may be ..........................Godzvilla!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Percy McCarthy on January 29, 2012, 10:53:42 AM
Think the Nigerian blew his chance by posting about it on facebook, and Rambo turned out to be unfounded speculation.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: LeeB on January 29, 2012, 12:40:44 PM
Liverpool contacted me and offered Caroll for my mother-in-law. It only fell through when they realised she was black.

Quality.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: James on January 29, 2012, 06:45:53 PM
From The People, via Sporting Life:

Quote
Aston Villa midfielder Barry Bannan could be a shock mover before the transfer window closes.


Interesting!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TheSandman on January 29, 2012, 06:55:51 PM
Not really. It's neither interesting, nor a shock. He's not been getting a game, he's a cocky guy and he'll be thinking that he can move and get a game elsewhere.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Irish villain on January 29, 2012, 09:45:04 PM
Barry Bannan played some beautiful passes today in the few minutes he was on. Why didn't Ireland go it himself with the first one?

I'd hate to see us sell him this season.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: saunders_heroes on January 29, 2012, 09:46:47 PM
Barry Bannan played some beautiful passes today in the few minutes he was on. Why didn't Ireland go it himself with the first one?

I'd hate to see us sell him this season.

Beautiful passes with no penetration. I also remember him wasting a couple of decent free kicks. He's a lightweight.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Irish villain on January 29, 2012, 09:49:24 PM
Barry Bannan played some beautiful passes today in the few minutes he was on. Why didn't Ireland go it himself with the first one?

I'd hate to see us sell him this season.

Beautiful passes with no penetration. I also remember him wasting a couple of decent free kicks. He's a lightweight.

There is a player in there though. I'd give him another season.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on January 29, 2012, 09:51:06 PM
Can't believe this thread is still open really. Lets face it we're stuck with the same incompetants till May and i doubt much will change in the summer either apart from departures
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Somniloquism on January 29, 2012, 09:57:09 PM
Barry Bannan played some beautiful passes today in the few minutes he was on. Why didn't Ireland go it himself with the first one?

I'd hate to see us sell him this season.

Beautiful passes with no penetration. I also remember him wasting a couple of decent free kicks. He's a lightweight.

So Ireland didn't get behind the defence (penetrate) and then bottle the responsibility and tried to play the marked Bent in instead?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Irish villain on January 29, 2012, 10:02:35 PM
Well, major surgery is required in the summer and if management and board don't realise that we are well and truly fucked. Some of our players are past it, others have no ambition, others think theya re too big for us. All that = severe problems.

I'd clear the whole place out in the summer. There won't be many tears shed, we already have lost the best players of the MON era. It's time for a fresh start.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TheSandman on January 29, 2012, 10:03:32 PM
I agree that is needed but I doubt it will happen. More of the same next season.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on January 29, 2012, 10:08:10 PM
yep. Lerner's totally lost any interest. Death by slow boredom
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: gervilla on January 29, 2012, 10:34:48 PM
yep. Lerner's totally lost any interest. Death by slow boredom

What is boring about relegation battle after relegation battle? I find it quite exhilarating to be honest.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TheSandman on January 29, 2012, 11:34:17 PM
Everton are in talks with Jelavic of Rangers. Probably not a player of interest to us but it does seem that they have started to loosen their purse strings.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on January 29, 2012, 11:37:07 PM
Everton are in talks with Jelavic of Rangers. Probably not a player of interest to us but it does seem that they have started to loosen their purse strings.

Nah, they've just sold Bilyaletdinov.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Steve R on January 29, 2012, 11:51:22 PM
Can't believe this thread is still open really. Lets face it we're stuck with the same incompetants till May and i doubt much will change in the summer either apart from departures

That's the worrying thing. There will hardly be enough signings/academy graduates to cover the ones that are bound to leave.

We'll probably be stuck with the ones we really need to turn around for yet another season.

Either that or we'll have to find an entire defence for the 3 or 4 million we may get for Collins.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on January 30, 2012, 12:03:17 AM
thats what's so soul destroying about it Steve. The only solution is for Lerner to splash the cash and thats the one thing he seems extremely unlikely to do.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: eastie on January 30, 2012, 06:46:57 AM
Splash the cash or leave and preferably the latter option.

We are light years away from the top 6 now so why would Lerner spend £30m on players in the hope of finishing 8 th to get an extra million in prize money- to compete at the top end would need £100m in new players .

We are a club in decline and for that randy must accept total responsibility!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: godzvilla on January 30, 2012, 07:04:00 AM
yep. Lerner's totally lost any interest. Death by slow boredom

What is boring about relegation battle after relegation battle? I find it quite exhilarating to be honest.
yep. Lerner's totally lost any interest. Death by slow boredom
yep. Lerner's totally lost any interest. Death by slow boredom

This is the same Lerner who paid out for 60 + Coaches to take fans down to the Emirates ? , thats some kind of disinterest .............same old morose post-match , navel gazing bollox on here , I see , Plus ça change plus ça reste la même chose , unfortunatley .  ......................Godzvilla!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dave on January 30, 2012, 08:10:38 AM
Splash the cash or leave and preferably the latter option.
Who are you expecting him to sell to?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: eastie on January 30, 2012, 08:45:13 AM
Splash the cash or leave and preferably the latter option.
Who are you expecting him to sell to?

Hope and pray QIA rumours will come true otherwise I expect years of stagnation and fighting to stay up.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 30, 2012, 09:42:41 AM
Hope and pray QIA rumours will come true otherwise I expect years of stagnation and fighting to stay up.

Seriously, people need to forget about this QIA takeover talks.  its NOT gong to happen. RL is here for the long run and we will have to accpet mid table mediocracy for the time being
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: themossman on January 30, 2012, 09:50:47 AM
Keane has shown me how badly we need to overhaul things. Even being well past his prime he has slotted straight in and highlighted how lacking in footballing brains and leadership we are. The thing that really worries me is that with no changes to the "senior" players (which seems likely) none of our promising youngsters will get anywhere near their potential.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Somniloquism on January 30, 2012, 10:15:26 AM
Keane has shown me how badly we need to overhaul things. Even being well past his prime he has slotted straight in and highlighted how lacking in footballing brains and leadership we are.

TBH that has been a problem for several years anyway. Merson was probably our last one for a footballing brain. Ireland, also has it but he is hit and miss and Bannan doesn't have the experience.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 30, 2012, 10:19:51 AM
The way I feel at the mo, I would go all out to get Keane on a permanent deal and make him captain.  Everyone else hasn't got a scooby doo!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: themossman on January 30, 2012, 10:26:57 AM
Same here. The more I see of him the more I understand the logic of this loan. It's great to see someone marshalling the players on the pitch, wanting the ball, showing a bit of gumption. If he has that kind of impact behind the scenes too then he could be very valuable. We need a few more like him to offset the bad eggs.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Somniloquism on January 30, 2012, 10:27:03 AM
The way I feel at the mo, I would go all out to get Keane on a permanent deal and make him captain.  Everyone else hasn't got a scooby doo!

I would hope we could do a Beckham and keep Keane until the Euros as he is currently hungry to have a competitive buildup for that. But I don't know what his state of mind would be after being as he took the easy option of MLS.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: N'ZMAV on January 30, 2012, 10:29:55 AM
We are in a lot of trouble. So many average players on massive wages that aren't even good that we'd never be able to shift.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 30, 2012, 10:37:09 AM
I feel sorry for the likes of Bannan, Clark and Albrighton at the moment.  They are surrounded by a number of shit players who are putting the team under pressure.  People keep saying "lets play the youngsters" but I dont think thats a good idea at the moment as it can only harm their confidence and development more.  Until we have some stability only then can we start introducing the youth more and more. Thats just my opinion.  I felt sorry for Bannan yesterday when he came on as there was some right moron's behind me just cursing him at every opportunity.  The kid had like 10mins to make an impact.

I admit, when the news of us signing keane broke, I wasn't too keen on the idea but it made more and more sense as the days went by.  I wish we could keep him until the end of the season.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: N'ZMAV on January 30, 2012, 10:40:23 AM
Well Keane's going to look like a hero the way he's going.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: brontebilly on January 30, 2012, 10:50:02 AM
I feel sorry for the likes of Bannan, Clark and Albrighton at the moment.  They are surrounded by a number of shit players who are putting the team under pressure.  People keep saying "lets play the youngsters" but I dont think thats a good idea at the moment as it can only harm their confidence and development more.  Until we have some stability only then can we start introducing the youth more and more. Thats just my opinion.  I felt sorry for Bannan yesterday when he came on as there was some right moron's behind me just cursing him at every opportunity.  The kid had like 10mins to make an impact.

I admit, when the news of us signing keane broke, I wasn't too keen on the idea but it made more and more sense as the days went by.  I wish we could keep him until the end of the season.

I think we need to realise too that our kids arent really kids at all. If they are looking to make it as decent EPL players they have an ideal opportunity to do so now at our cash strapped club. I have high hopes for Clark. Bannan and Albrighton could go either way for me. Havent seen enough of Gardner to comment but he isnt able to play in a 2 man midfield yet anyway. Herd will be useful to have as a squad player I feel. Weimann, Fonz, Lichaj, Baker - the jury is well and truly out if they could even fill in as squad players for us.

The unfortunate reality is that we need to invest in quality. Cuellar and Petrov will go in the summer. Beye and Heskey will be off the wagebill. Warnock also needs to go that is clear. But we need to replace these with quality not the Alan Hutton's of this world. Decisions will need to be made soon on the younger players and if they are going to make it or not. Delph had a big chance this season at Villa to make a position for himself for the next 5 years but he failed miserably. Stevens is only a gamble really. Nzogbia has been a big disappointment but is a talented player for sure. Bent, Keane, Gabby, Ireland, Given, Dunne, Clark - there is a nucleus of a very good side but we need to supplement these with proven quality.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ROBBO on January 30, 2012, 11:05:21 AM
When they are 18-19 they can still be classed as kids, if they are not getting a regular spot in a team as weak as ours when they are in their early twenties it probably means they are not going to make it.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 30, 2012, 11:07:57 AM
Yeh, you are right. they cant be called kids anymore.  I guess I have been accustomed to calling them that.  These young men need to start stamping their authority on the pitch now as this is the best time for them to make a real name for themselves.

Gary Gardner still has pletny of time so not too worried about him at the moment.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: James on January 30, 2012, 11:10:31 AM
yep. Lerner's totally lost any interest. Death by slow boredom

What is boring about relegation battle after relegation battle? I find it quite exhilarating to be honest.
yep. Lerner's totally lost any interest. Death by slow boredom
yep. Lerner's totally lost any interest. Death by slow boredom

This is the same Lerner who paid out for 60 + Coaches to take fans down to the Emirates ? , thats some kind of disinterest .............same old morose post-match , navel gazing bollox on here , I see , Plus ça change plus ça reste la même chose , unfortunatley .  ......................Godzvilla!

I'm sure the gesture re:the coaches was rightly appreciated, BUT, you can't blame people for questioning him when he says fuck all and does even less! Right now, if he were to give AMc £30m for transfers would players actually want to join Villa? The answer is 'only for the money' so we wouldn't attract any better than we currently have. He's made a rod for his own back in clearing the dead wood and the wage bill before all else. It might help if he just told us what his intentions are and whether or not he has any sort of plan. Until he does, he'll be criticised because he's calling the shots. He doesn't need to give interviews or go on TV, the club has a website - all he has to do is write a statement FFS!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 30, 2012, 11:23:08 AM
Exactly!  We have no idea of what his plans are apart from reducing the wage bill and off load the players that are not being used.  Theres no talk of what the new plan is after plan A (get into the champions league within 5 years) failed miserably.  I, as a fan, have the right to know what the clubs plan is for the next 3/4 years so I can make a decision on whether to renew my season ticket or just hold onto my cash and use it elsewhere.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: midnite on January 30, 2012, 11:54:29 AM
I understand this is so frustrating. But this is football and supporting Aston villa.

Being a fan doesn't give you a right to know what the board is planning with the club over the next 3 years. It doesn't work that way. And if they were to release a plan for the fans it would be that they strive to be competitive in the premiere league, aiming for European places and ultimately the champions league. We may all call them liers but then if they announce anything less then they get hammered for not being ambitious enough.

You buy a season ticket because you want to. Not because the club has a five year plan. Plus anythig can happen in that time. We could go bust. We could get taken over by the richest man on the planet. We could stay exactly where we are. Frustrating? Yes. But that's part of being a football fan.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Merv on January 30, 2012, 12:02:15 PM
We have no idea of what his plans are apart from reducing the wage bill and off load the players that are not being used. 

I think you've answered your query yourself there.

Not surprised we're not signing anyone else this Jan. The summer will be interesting. As others have said, we do have the nucleus of a decent side but it will be telling who we bring in to replace the players we think are leaving; we need quality to back up the likes of Bent, Gabby and bring out the best in our younger (I agree, Clark, Bannan, Albrighton are 22-23 range, no longer kids) players.

The Arsenal game brought home to me the realities of our squad; 3-2 down and McLeish's favoured options were Gardener and Bannan. He didn't have a lot else to choose from, and it's not as if we have a long injury list, either. Though, I suppose this brings into question the decision to loan out Delph and Delfouneso at this point.

What do I think will happen in the summer? I have absolutely no idea!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 30, 2012, 12:04:12 PM
I dont need to know every little thing that goes on behind the scenes but some sort of idea what their plans are for the coming years i.e. aim to finish top 8 and attempt to win cups etc.  I don't know, maybe you're right abour fans frustrations as they had a clear plan when RL first took over (5 year plan - champs league footy) but since then, there has been no talk of anything.  All there has been talk of is reducing the wage bill and thats it really.

Yes you do buy a season ticket becasue you want to but your decision can be influenced by the ambition of the club especially in this crappy climate we are in - parting with £350+ is a lot especially if we are going to be served up with dross every week and no real idea of whats going on.  Id rather just pick and choose the games I go to next season as the current deals are better than being a season ticket holder.

Anyway, back to topic... I doubt we will see any news faces before the deadline. Havent seen any new links to players
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Chris Smith on January 30, 2012, 12:07:36 PM
We always get these demands for statements from the board then as soon as they do the same people say "don't tell me, show me" or some similar nonsense.

We all know what the position is, we're having to get the wage bill in order so in order to gring pmayets in others will have to leave.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dave Cooper please on January 30, 2012, 12:15:55 PM
Splash the cash or leave and preferably the latter option.


Leave to be replaced by who?
Think Venky's or Ranson before you go wishing for Lerner to leave.
Couldn't be worse you say? Oh yes it fucking could!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dave Cooper please on January 30, 2012, 12:20:40 PM

We all know what the position is, we're having to get the wage bill in order so in order to gring pmayets in others will have to leave.

I don't think we need to gring any pmayets in myself.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 30, 2012, 12:24:05 PM
Just read that we have made a last ditched attempt to sign Keisuke Honda from under the noses of Lazio.  Smells like another bullshit story to me! £12m is being quoted lol
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Somniloquism on January 30, 2012, 12:25:22 PM

We all know what the position is, we're having to get the wage bill in order so in order to gring pmayets in others will have to leave.

I don't think we need to gring any pmayets in myself.

I'm sure he will blame his iPad when it it is really the PICNIC virus.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Astral Weeks on January 30, 2012, 12:25:31 PM
Splash the cash or leave and preferably the latter option.


Leave to be replaced by who?
Think Venky's or Ranson before you go wishing for Lerner to leave.
Couldn't be worse you say? Oh yes it fucking could!

Dead right. I'm not overjoyed at the way Randy's running things at present, but it could be a damn sight worse
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 30, 2012, 12:26:08 PM

We all know what the position is, we're having to get the wage bill in order so in order to gring pmayets in others will have to leave.

I don't think we need to gring any pmayets in myself.

I have to disagree with you Chas.  I think a few pmayets would come useful  ;)
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: N'ZMAV on January 30, 2012, 12:26:45 PM
I think we should be going for some younger players, we're obviously a selling club now, let's try and blood some younger players, maybe from Championship or smaller clubs and make a mint from them. Fuck it.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TimTheVillain on January 30, 2012, 12:35:29 PM
Splash the cash or leave and preferably the latter option.


Leave to be replaced by who?
Think Venky's or Ranson before you go wishing for Lerner to leave.
Couldn't be worse you say? Oh yes it fucking could!

Dead right. I'm not overjoyed at the way Randy's running things at present, but it could be a damn sight worse

And that is the sort of mentality we seem to have in some quarters- 'It could have been a lot worse' !

Try, 'It could have been a lot better', because initially it was supposed to be.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 30, 2012, 01:01:52 PM
Too right it could be worse, that goes without saying.

Just like it could have been worse under Doug.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: James on January 30, 2012, 01:39:33 PM
We always get these demands for statements from the board then as soon as they do the same people say "don't tell me, show me" or some similar nonsense.

We all know what the position is, we're having to get the wage bill in order so in order to gring pmayets in others will have to leave.

Yes, but what then? Is he trying to sell up? Is he going to put the past mistakes behind him and 'go again'? Is there another year of 'scrimp and save' to follow?

We just don't know, like Blackburn fans and to a lesser extent Arsenal fans whose boards just aren't talking to them, hence, fans feeling 'disconnected' from the clubs.

A simple statement could change that and get fans back with the club now, or indeed totally cut them adrift, but the perception is that he is disinterested, given up or whatever. Nobody can know whether that's correct or not because there's nothing, nothing, coming from the board.

A few honest words on the OS from Randy could go a lot further than however many coaches he paid for yesterday in terms of getting fans behind the club and his choice of manager. Right now nobody knows what to think and that's lousy management by anyone's standards, what we used to call 'mushroom management' in fact and it's proven not to work!

I'd love to believe that it would be 'learn, regroup and go again' from the summer, but I have nothing to base that on at the moment other than blind hope! And if it is that Randy is selling, then we can at least brace ourselves for whatever happens next. It's not asking too much nor is it pointless to want some idea from the man what direction he sees us taking.

I'm not saying that I want him out because I don't know what his thoughts are, and personally he's done more than enough already IMHO to be accorded the respect and faith of fans to 'go again'. He just needs to let us know where he stands!

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on January 30, 2012, 01:44:27 PM
yep. Lerner's totally lost any interest. Death by slow boredom

What is boring about relegation battle after relegation battle? I find it quite exhilarating to be honest.
yep. Lerner's totally lost any interest. Death by slow boredom
yep. Lerner's totally lost any interest. Death by slow boredom

This is the same Lerner who paid out for 60 + Coaches to take fans down to the Emirates ? , thats some kind of disinterest .............same old morose post-match , navel gazing bollox on here , I see , Plus ça change plus ça reste la même chose , unfortunatley .  ......................Godzvilla!


yeah, well if i'd pocketed about 15m from the club in transfer fees in the summer, i'd woiuldn't mind paying for a coach trip either.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: john e on January 30, 2012, 01:48:24 PM
i dont think statements from the club do much good to be honest, people just twist and read what they want to in them, myself included.
it just creates even more speculation and a lot of people will just refuse to believe whats being said anyway

actions always speak louder than words, thats what i'l be waiting for
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Merv on January 30, 2012, 02:10:49 PM
And that is the sort of mentality we seem to have in some quarters- 'It could have been a lot worse' !

Try, 'It could have been a lot better', because initially it was supposed to be.

Well, yes. This is what happens when the expectations have been gradually reduced for 18 months or more.. we're now saying things could be worse, which they could. But, as you say, they could be a lot better, too. We shouldn't lose sight of that.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: eastie on January 30, 2012, 04:23:17 PM
To stay where we are in the premiership would take a fair amount of investment , to get anywhere near the top 6 would take multi multi millions as liverpool are finding out - with the prize money as it is why would randy spend £30m to get maybe £2m more in prize money- seems to me without massive investment in players we are going to be stagnating for a long long time and gates will continue to drop.

Football nowadays is all about money and not the game I loved in the 70s.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Vanilla on January 30, 2012, 04:38:25 PM
To stay where we are in the premiership would take a fair amount of investment , to get anywhere near the top 6 would take multi multi millions as liverpool are finding out - with the prize money as it is why would randy spend £30m to get maybe £2m more in prize money- seems to me without massive investment in players we are going to be stagnating for a long long time and gates will continue to drop.

Football nowadays is all about money and not the game I loved in the 70s.

Absolutely true re: Liverpool. They spent multiples of millions in the last 12 months just to stay in the shadow of the leading pack. Villa did the usual short term splurge, then pulled the purse strings closed.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Duncan Shaw on January 30, 2012, 04:45:45 PM
To stay where we are in the premiership would take a fair amount of investment , to get anywhere near the top 6 would take multi multi millions as liverpool are finding out - with the prize money as it is why would randy spend £30m to get maybe £2m more in prize money- seems to me without massive investment in players we are going to be stagnating for a long long time and gates will continue to drop.

Football nowadays is all about money and not the game I loved in the 70s.

Absolutely true re: Liverpool. They spent multiples of millions in the last 12 months just to stay in the shadow of the leading pack. Villa did the usual short term splurge, then pulled the purse strings closed.

Well I've just done the BBC predictor thingy, as honestly as I could, and I've got us finishing 7th.  That said there were only three points between 7th and 11th.

We'll be OK when QIA take over!!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 30, 2012, 05:26:39 PM
We have been linked with Keith fecking Andrews of Blackburn!  ffs! 

Also, Albrighton has tweeted saying he is will out for 10 days and should be back for the Citeh game
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Risso on January 30, 2012, 06:03:44 PM
Splash the cash or leave and preferably the latter option.


Leave to be replaced by who?
Think Venky's or Ranson before you go wishing for Lerner to leave.
Couldn't be worse you say? Oh yes it fucking could!

Dead right. I'm not overjoyed at the way Randy's running things at present, but it could be a damn sight worse

Why does it have to be a Venkys? Why not a Mansour, Abramovitch or ENIC?  To be honest I'd seettle for a decent businessman instead of a rich playboy type who apparently isn't that rich any more.  Lerner has proved in two teams that he's hopeless, so expect his name to start being mentioned in the same vein as Venkys anytime soon.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: KevinGage on January 30, 2012, 06:10:47 PM
Could be worse should be our new club motto.

In fact, it would have been a perfect fit from about the early noughties onwards (with a brief interlude between 2006/10).


Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Shrek on January 30, 2012, 06:56:51 PM
yep. Lerner's totally lost any interest. Death by slow boredom

What is boring about relegation battle after relegation battle? I find it quite exhilarating to be honest.
yep. Lerner's totally lost any interest. Death by slow boredom
yep. Lerner's totally lost any interest. Death by slow boredom

This is the same Lerner who paid out for 60 + Coaches to take fans down to the Emirates ? , thats some kind of disinterest .............same old morose post-match , navel gazing bollox on here , I see , Plus ça change plus ça reste la même chose , unfortunatley .  ......................Godzvilla!


yeah, well if i'd pocketed about 15m from the club in transfer fees in the summer, i'd woiuldn't mind paying for a coach trip either.

Randy never folked out anything, we used the profits from progressing in the cup to pay for the coaches.

If we had won yesterday we would have earnt £451,000.00 so far in the FA Cup, even with us losing we would have got at least half that.

It was still a good gesture though, one which shows he cares about the club in my opinion.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on January 30, 2012, 08:04:20 PM
I think i'd rather he'd just kept the money for the club's finances. okay so what he paid for the coaches probably just about came to Beye's monthly wage but when you're busy telling us how we have cut the wage bill, sell to buy etc.. it seems a bit much to be wasting money in other directions, nice gesture or not.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Clampy on January 30, 2012, 08:12:01 PM
I think the free coaches was a fantastic idea. If it enabled fans who normally can't afford to go away a chance to do so and get behind the team, then that's fine by me.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 30, 2012, 08:16:40 PM
Person 1: "Randy doesn't care about the club anymore and he should fuck off as he obviously is only interested in saving money"

Person 2: "What about the free coaches to Arsenal? That shows he cares and they weren't free for to him/the club?"

Person 1: "Well yeah, but he shouldn't have spent the money, he should have saved it and done nothing rather than show us he cares"
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on January 30, 2012, 08:46:56 PM
if he wants to show he cares, then he should open up his wallet properly and spend some of the money he's siphoned off since last summer. A pittance in real terms on coach travel  is neither here nor there
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Clampy on January 30, 2012, 08:54:58 PM
Hmm, anyway back on to this transfer window, i had a feeling it was going to be quiet but not this quiet.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Vanilla on January 30, 2012, 09:28:35 PM
Hmm, anyway back on to this transfer window, i had a feeling it was going to be quiet but not this quiet.

I prefer a bit of silly transfer noise than absolute quiet. Makes you worried that there is some behind the scenes machinations. 
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on January 30, 2012, 09:45:17 PM
I think i realised that was our lot after the AM letter when he bothered to waste a few paragrapths prasiing a loan signing and some salifou-type punt on a youngster like it deserved a round of applause
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: paul_e on January 30, 2012, 09:54:42 PM
To stay where we are in the premiership would take a fair amount of investment , to get anywhere near the top 6 would take multi multi millions as liverpool are finding out - with the prize money as it is why would randy spend £30m to get maybe £2m more in prize money- seems to me without massive investment in players we are going to be stagnating for a long long time and gates will continue to drop.

Football nowadays is all about money and not the game I loved in the 70s.

Absolutely true re: Liverpool. They spent multiples of millions in the last 12 months just to stay in the shadow of the leading pack. Villa did the usual short term splurge, then pulled the purse strings closed.

This isn't true.  The money only needs to be spent in that way if you take a short term view.  Getting to the top 6 on a smaller budget is possible, it requires very good management and coaching and a squad of players that all buy in to the philosophy.  What we should be doing is building an ethos within the club from the bottom up where we play a certain way and all the training and scouting is focused on getting players that fit that mould.  If you get it right the majority of your squad is effectively free so the money you do have to spend is to fill gaps.  The most successful team in world football currently (Barcelona) is built on this very principle.  Most importantly if you look at the players that have come through their ranks the majority of them are local lads, this is what we should be looking to replicate.

Transitioning to this will mean a few years of struggling along but seeing as we're going to have that anyway at least something like this would be a sign of us having a plan.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JUAN PABLO on January 30, 2012, 09:57:07 PM
I would buy Lee Peltier from Leicester or the Watford player  Adrian Mariappa for RB and get rid of Hutton in the summer .
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Irish villain on January 30, 2012, 10:39:41 PM
Could be worse should be our new club motto.

In fact, it would have been a perfect fit from about the early noughties onwards (with a brief interlude between 2006/10).

The noughties weren't a good decade for us. For the few years we were good we managed to underachieve. I'd take the 90s over the noughties anyday!



Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: villadelph on January 30, 2012, 11:52:51 PM
I can't believe this thread hit 200 pages and all we got was Robbie Keane on a six week.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TheSandman on January 30, 2012, 11:54:20 PM
I'm surprised it's ONLY that long.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ROBBO on January 31, 2012, 05:26:55 AM
The problem us and most premiership clubs have is that it will be almost impossible to challenge for Europe simply because we have all become feeder teams for the so called elite. As soon as you have players that show they can play at the top they will be targeted and will leave, the system has to change for a decent competition.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Phil from the upper holte on January 31, 2012, 06:30:54 AM
Keith Andrews has handed in a transfer request
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Clampy on January 31, 2012, 08:08:53 AM
Keith Andrews has handed in a transfer request

I saw that on SSN this morning. Surely not.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on January 31, 2012, 08:26:00 AM
well he's a defensive midfielder, Irish. looks odds on i'd say.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 31, 2012, 08:58:44 AM
Keith Andrews has handed in a transfer request

He would genuinely be one of the poorest players we've signed for a long time, he has nothing.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Merv on January 31, 2012, 09:03:54 AM
Keith Andrews has handed in a transfer request

Goody. It's on.

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ROBBO on January 31, 2012, 09:16:14 AM
Surely if he's going anywhere its to Wigan, it would be to horrible contemplating this site should it be to us, it would make getting Harewood look like a stroke of genius.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: David_Nab on January 31, 2012, 09:23:34 AM
Beye leaving on a perm ..any chance we could get a sneaky last minute deal in with the saved wages ...probably not ..
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on January 31, 2012, 09:35:20 AM
I dont care what hairstyle he's leaving with as long as he goes.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 31, 2012, 10:09:49 AM
Somone said the other day that Phil Dowd should be driving a van. Similarly, Keith Andrews should be mowing lawns or something.

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: CJ on January 31, 2012, 10:13:24 AM
Hopefully he'll be going to Ipswich and he can supplement his income driving a tractor
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: OzVilla on January 31, 2012, 10:19:07 AM
On another note and I know we shouldn't but what a typical MON signing Wayne Bridge would be.  Bet he'd be on 60k a week or thereabouts and been hugely average for years now.

Similarly with Kevin Davies, 34, zero re-sale value at all, looks like his best days are well and truely behind him.  I'm just shocked it's happening for him this early in the day.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on January 31, 2012, 10:35:07 AM
From the bbc thingy

Luke Birmingham on text, via 81111: "I've heard James Collins going to Sunderland for £3m with Craig Gardner going back to Villa in exchange. Also Heskey on O'Neill's radar if Kevin Davies deal falls through. "



Sadly i fear MON won't buy any of the tat he left here just out of spite
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 31, 2012, 10:42:54 AM
From the bbc thingy

Luke Birmingham on text, via 81111: "I've heard James Collins going to Sunderland for £3m with Craig Gardner going back to Villa in exchange. Also Heskey on O'Neill's radar if Kevin Davies deal falls through. "


LOL!  read this and made me laugh!  People always make up loads of bull on deadline day.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: N'ZMAV on January 31, 2012, 10:48:53 AM
I think we should be looking at players in their early twenties from the Championship, and look to develop them into better players and flog them for bigger money a couple of years later. I really can't see any other way we can compete in this market any more
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on January 31, 2012, 10:50:54 AM
yep. Heskey leaving..... Nice things like that just don't happen to aston villa fans ATM. More chance of the club announcing he's extended his contract with our luck.
Title: Transfer
Post by: cdbearsfan on January 31, 2012, 10:54:19 AM
Wayne Bridge -> Sunderland.

English? Tick.

Past it? Tick.

On ridiculous wages? Tick.

It's a Martin O'Neill hat-trick!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: villasjf on January 31, 2012, 11:07:11 AM
if he wants to show he cares, then he should open up his wallet properly and spend some of the money he's siphoned off since last summer. A pittance in real terms on coach travel  is neither here nor there
Does he trust this manager more than the other one after all Hutton and Nzog cost a lot of money and what have they done?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on January 31, 2012, 11:12:06 AM
if he wants to show he cares, then he should open up his wallet properly and spend some of the money he's siphoned off since last summer. A pittance in real terms on coach travel  is neither here nor there
Does he trust this manager more than the other one after all Hutton and Nzog cost a lot of money and what have they done?

well if he doesn't he should sack him,  and while he's at it, remove himself from any role in future managerial recruitment because if you lose faith in your manager after 5 months then its obvious you haven't got a clue
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ROBBO on January 31, 2012, 11:18:15 AM
From the bbc thingy

Luke Birmingham on text, via 81111: "I've heard James Collins going to Sunderland for £3m with Craig Gardner going back to Villa in exchange. Also Heskey on O'Neill's radar if Kevin Davies deal falls through. "



Sadly i fear MON won't buy any of the tat he left here just out of spite

He only knows one way, stuck in the past, pity we kept him two years too long.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 31, 2012, 11:26:26 AM
Good news, QPR are in talks with Fulham for the possible transfer of Bobby Zamora!  I bet Eck is thinking "aaah the one that got away"

We might aswell talk about other teams signings in this thread as clearly, we are not going to do any business.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: N'ZMAV on January 31, 2012, 11:38:06 AM
Yeah, no point in talking about Villa...
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: achilles on January 31, 2012, 11:39:27 AM
Good news, QPR are in talks with Fulham for the possible transfer of Bobby Zamora!  I bet Eck is thinking "aaah the one that got away"

We might aswell talk about other teams signings in this thread as clearly, we are not going to do any business.

That is why its over 200 pages now!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 31, 2012, 11:42:13 AM
Just saw this headline and thought to myself "what the f*ck is this about" -
Martin Jol sells himself to Aston Villa

http://tinyurl.com/82993rz


Can someone explain what the hell this nonsense is about?
I know its stupid talk but what posesses people to make up shut tripe?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: N'ZMAV on January 31, 2012, 11:49:54 AM
Can't work that out!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: stubbsyandy on January 31, 2012, 11:52:20 AM
It's a Martin O'Neill hat-trick!

Hat trick tick
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 31, 2012, 11:52:57 AM
Can't work that out!

And I thought us Brummie's were bored on transfer deadline day! clearly the cockney Fulham fans have nothing better to do
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: serbentoflight on January 31, 2012, 11:58:00 AM
Alex_Wilshaw on Twitter: "Jordan Rhodes looking like Bent's replacement at Villa if he goes to Liverpool for £20 million."
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Eckybloke on January 31, 2012, 12:01:22 PM
Alex_Wilshaw on Twitter: "Jordan Rhodes looking like Bent's replacement at Villa if he goes to Liverpool for £20 million."

Jordan Rhodes  -why not?  Young, scores goals for fun and shouldn't be too expensive.

As a replacement for Bent - no thanks.
 
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 31, 2012, 12:01:59 PM
Alex_Wilshaw on Twitter: "Jordan Rhodes looking like Bent's replacement at Villa if he goes to Liverpool for £20 million."

Maybe thats something that will happen in the summer NOT in Jan as Huddersfiled have said they are not selling Rhodes this transfer window
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: achilles on January 31, 2012, 12:03:23 PM
Alex_Wilshaw on Twitter: "Jordan Rhodes looking like Bent's replacement at Villa if he goes to Liverpool for £20 million."

Its getting worse! lol
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: N'ZMAV on January 31, 2012, 12:07:37 PM
Rhodes?! WTF!!!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Matt C on January 31, 2012, 12:08:09 PM
Wayne Bridge & Kevin Davies. Some people never change.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: N'ZMAV on January 31, 2012, 12:09:42 PM
Wayne Bridge & Kevin Davies. Some people never change.
MON is a nutter. That's probably well over £100,000 a week between them.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: DerHammer on January 31, 2012, 12:09:47 PM
Probably the quietest transfer deadline day ever for Villa (and yes, I'm taking into account the MON years too)
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: DerHammer on January 31, 2012, 12:13:53 PM
I was just about to log onto the Sky Sports page for Villa transfer news (it was taking a while to load the page) when I realised why am I even bothering to look, theres gonna be fuck all happening!!!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JUAN PABLO on January 31, 2012, 12:17:58 PM
Alex_Wilshaw on Twitter: "Jordan Rhodes looking like Bent's replacement at Villa if he goes to Liverpool for £20 million."


replacement for Heskey   YES PLEASE
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: N'ZMAV on January 31, 2012, 12:18:29 PM
Boring
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mark Samuels on January 31, 2012, 12:22:04 PM
And Alex Wilshaw is who? Oh, a 19 year old student making up rumours on deadline day. Move along, folks.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 31, 2012, 12:28:05 PM
Rumours about Liverpool having a £14m bid for Defoe accepted.

Mental money if true.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 31, 2012, 12:28:27 PM
And Alex Wilshaw is who? Oh, a 19 year old student making up rumours on deadline day. Move along, folks.
Not to mention he is at the University of Kent and supports Leeds and is based on Dover!  Such a sad little pleb.  CLearly he has NO uni work to be getting on with so makes up this tosh to get a reaction.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on January 31, 2012, 12:31:35 PM
Rumours about Liverpool having a £14m bid for Defoe accepted.

Mental money if true.

If that's true I could see Carroll being at Spurs before the end of the day cos 'arry loyaks 'im innit.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 31, 2012, 12:32:29 PM
Rumours about Liverpool having a £14m bid for Defoe accepted.

Mental money if true.

If that's true I could see Carroll being at Spurs before the end of the day cos 'arry loyaks 'im innit.

If it is true (14m for Defoe), we should all bow down to Daniel Levy for proving himself a true master of the transfer system once more.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on January 31, 2012, 12:33:48 PM
Rumours about Liverpool having a £14m bid for Defoe accepted.

Mental money if true.

If that's true I could see Carroll being at Spurs before the end of the day cos 'arry loyaks 'im innit.

If it is true (14m for Defoe), we should all bow down to Daniel Levy for proving himself a true master of the transfer system once more.

By Liverpool's standards it's a bargain.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: MonsXI on January 31, 2012, 12:36:04 PM
Rumours about Liverpool having a £14m bid for Defoe accepted.

Mental money if true.

How much of that will go into 'Arry's Monaco account?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Somniloquism on January 31, 2012, 12:37:20 PM
Rumours about Liverpool having a £14m bid for Defoe accepted.

Mental money if true.

If that's true I could see Carroll being at Spurs before the end of the day cos 'arry loyaks 'im innit.

If it is true (14m for Defoe), we should all bow down to Daniel Levy for proving himself a true master of the transfer system once more.

Depends, if 'Arry still has the profit margin on players deal, he might just be covering his legal costs.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: KevinGage on January 31, 2012, 12:38:44 PM
£14 mill for a goalscorer like Defoe isn't Carroll - mental   (but then I don't think any other transfer from now until the end of recorded time will be).

It's better value than the money they would have had to cough up for Bent too, and I think Defoe is actually the better finisher of the two (though Bent's movement in and around the box is better).

I can't see 'arry wanting Carroll in exchange though.  If the Divine Ponytail goes anywhere, I expect it to be back to Newcastle on loan.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on January 31, 2012, 12:39:21 PM
It's probably just some scouser replying to a comment about needing a striker.

"Yeah, deffo!"
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 31, 2012, 12:42:26 PM
Wayne Bridge & Kevin Davies. Some people never change.
MON is a nutter. That's probably well over £100,000 a week between them.

I wonder if Davey is beginning to understand what we were on about now.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dave Cooper please on January 31, 2012, 12:44:49 PM
Splash the cash or leave and preferably the latter option.


Leave to be replaced by who?
Think Venky's or Ranson before you go wishing for Lerner to leave.
Couldn't be worse you say? Oh yes it fucking could!

Dead right. I'm not overjoyed at the way Randy's running things at present, but it could be a damn sight worse

Why does it have to be a Venkys? Why not a Mansour, Abramovitch or ENIC? 

Yes, we could strike it lucky, but I'd rather wait until we have a buyer of that sort of pedigree (and money!) before starting on the Lerner Out campaign.
If, as many suggest, he doesn't care about Villa then rumblings of discontent towards him may well make his mind up to sell up to whoever can pay off the loans, or he may even decide to cut his losses and sell to the highest (or only) bidder, then we could be a target for any old fairly rich shyster.
In a couple of years we could be dreaming of the heights of mid-table Premiership obscurity.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Lambert and Payne on January 31, 2012, 12:49:31 PM
I'm not convinced by the Monsours, what's going to happen after they win everything, he's going to turn to his advisor or whatever and say I'm bored now. There fucked when that happens. Not happy with Randy atm, but he's done well when you weigh things up and I'd rather we didn't sell up

Just heard Collins to S'land and Gardner back to Villa. I'd take it if true?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on January 31, 2012, 12:51:40 PM
Only if another centre half was coming in.
I've no problems having Craig back.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: exigo on January 31, 2012, 12:53:28 PM
Just heard Collins to S'land and Gardner back to Villa. I'd take it if true?

Well, Gary Gardner does need someone to clean his boots now he's left the academy. Beyond that, what's the point of signing Craig?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: tarzansbrother on January 31, 2012, 12:57:47 PM
So it looks like Spurs freshen their squad and Villa stay content with players seeing out their contracts.  Craig Gardner on loan why not? Would get goals help give our midfield bite and help his brothers development. Villa really are a poor shower at the moment.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on January 31, 2012, 12:58:23 PM
With our midfield options as they are at the moment he's a decent squad option.
Not that I believe the rumours yet.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Merv on January 31, 2012, 12:59:57 PM
If it is true (14m for Defoe), we should all bow down to Daniel Levy for proving himself a true master of the transfer system once more.

Levy's probably sewn in a '£1m for each goal Defoe scores' clause, too. And Liverpool would still take that.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JUAN PABLO on January 31, 2012, 01:02:59 PM
Rumours about Liverpool having a £14m bid for Defoe accepted.

Mental money if true.

If that's true I could see Carroll being at Spurs before the end of the day cos 'arry loyaks 'im innit.

Saha for spurzzzzz
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JUAN PABLO on January 31, 2012, 01:04:33 PM
Only if another centre half was coming in.
I've no problems having Craig back.

as long as Gary is in the team and Craig on the bench
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on January 31, 2012, 01:12:00 PM
Only if another centre half was coming in.
I've no problems having Craig back.

as long as Gary is in the team and Craig on the bench

Gary will come through regardless. But they could play together.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: David_Nab on January 31, 2012, 01:14:42 PM
Saha to Spurs is a wierd one can only think it's short term cover so they can allocate funds from selling Payblochenko to other area's of the team..

Certainly apart from QPR no one is buying without selling ....just the player's we would like to move on are
1)Not worth alot
2)On suck high wages no one will take them !
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Hoppo on January 31, 2012, 01:15:27 PM
Craig at right back for me.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Axl Rose on January 31, 2012, 01:15:47 PM
Slightly off topic,although I spat my dinner out at the sheer ridiculousness of this comment regarding Mourrinho and the England job.

http://sport.uk.msn.com/football/mourinhos-madrid-exit-could-lead-to-england-job

and scroll down a little bit

'the same tired names keep cropping up to be the next england manager, Redknapp, Pardew, Houghton, none have won sod all worth talking about, i don,t care if the poxy fa give the job to the wop, but what about trying something new, go for a guy who knows where he,s going, Paul Jewel, he,s successful, sensible, clever and english, they woulden,t  have clough, this guys the best iv,e seen since brian, lets try him, i think the guys got something special about him'

Paul Jewell.....deary me

And doesn't this guy love a comma?! wow


It just seemed more interesting than hearing that Villa will be signing nobody. I hope I am proved wrong.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: olaftab on January 31, 2012, 01:22:01 PM

Rumours about Liverpool having a £14m bid for Defoe accepted.

Mental money if true.


Errrmm...he is black
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: timeoutbigbar on January 31, 2012, 01:23:56 PM
Slightly off topic,although I spat my dinner out at the sheer ridiculousness of this comment regarding Mourrinho and the England job.

http://sport.uk.msn.com/football/mourinhos-madrid-exit-could-lead-to-england-job

and scroll down a little bit

'the same tired names keep cropping up to be the next england manager, Redknapp, Pardew, Houghton, none have won sod all worth talking about, i don,t care if the poxy fa give the job to the wop, but what about trying something new, go for a guy who knows where he,s going, Paul Jewel, he,s successful, sensible, clever and english, they woulden,t  have clough, this guys the best iv,e seen since brian, lets try him, i think the guys got something special about him'

Paul Jewell.....deary me

And doesn't this guy love a comma?! wow


It just seemed more interesting than hearing that Villa will be signing nobody. I hope I am proved wrong.

I suppose Paul has to keep busy somehow, nothing wrong with a bit of self promotion!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on January 31, 2012, 01:32:39 PM

Rumours about Liverpool having a £14m bid for Defoe accepted.

Mental money if true.

Errrmm...he is black

He won't be playing. They need someone to serve the rich white men drinks, and fan them when they get hot as another Andy Carroll header goes way over the bar.

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on January 31, 2012, 01:34:15 PM
Slightly off topic,although I spat my dinner out at the sheer ridiculousness of this comment regarding Mourrinho and the England job.

http://sport.uk.msn.com/football/mourinhos-madrid-exit-could-lead-to-england-job

and scroll down a little bit

'the same tired names keep cropping up to be the next england manager, Redknapp, Pardew, Houghton, none have won sod all worth talking about, i don,t care if the poxy fa give the job to the wop, but what about trying something new, go for a guy who knows where he,s going, Paul Jewel, he,s successful, sensible, clever and english, they woulden,t  have clough, this guys the best iv,e seen since brian, lets try him, i think the guys got something special about him'

Paul Jewell.....deary me

And doesn't this guy love a comma?! wow


It just seemed more interesting than hearing that Villa will be signing nobody. I hope I am proved wrong.

I suppose Paul has to keep busy somehow, nothing wrong with a bit of self promotion!

better this than seeing his fat arse pounding some bird on top of a car
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JJ-AV on January 31, 2012, 01:37:35 PM
Really don't rate Craig, positionally average and gives the ball away too much. His shoot on sight policy pisses me off too.

Still, he did well in a McLeish system before.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on January 31, 2012, 01:41:16 PM
The one thing with Gardner is that he will always give 100%, he will never let us down in terms of effort and commitment. Right now, that's something we need, especially in the middle of the park where we are quite exposed. Will he propel us forward? No. Will be a handy addition to the squad? I think so. He'd provide good protection for the back four allowing Ireland, little Gazza, Keane etc to go forward, and he will chip in with the odd goal too.
If it happens it won't be the end of the world, and he'll be very motivated to be back in the city, and at a club where his brother is starting to make an impact.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: David_Nab on January 31, 2012, 02:04:00 PM
Sunderland sign Bridge ..MON continues his crusade to employ every LB eligiable to play for England
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: themossman on January 31, 2012, 02:04:11 PM
1356: BBC Sport's Pat Murphy reports that there will be no transfer business at Aston Villa. Manager Alex McLeish sais: "I never thought we'd be doing major business and that's proved to be the case." Chairman Randy Lerner has talked of financial stability and McLeish says he understands that.

Predictable but still vaguely depressing.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: badluckeric(gates) on January 31, 2012, 02:04:12 PM
The one thing with Gardner is that he will always give 100%, he will never let us down in terms of effort and commitment. Right now, that's something we need, especially in the middle of the park where we are quite exposed. Will he propel us forward? No. Will be a handy addition to the squad? I think so. He'd provide good protection for the back four allowing Ireland, little Gazza, Keane etc to go forward, and he will chip in with the odd goal too.
If it happens it won't be the end of the world, and he'll be very motivated to be back in the city, and at a club where his brother is starting to make an impact.
I too would welcome this. Some midfield bite and suits where we currently are. Can't see it though
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: James on January 31, 2012, 02:04:28 PM
Had to laugh at this, well it's from The Mirror:

Quote
Doncaster are trying to sign Habib Beye on a permanent deal from Aston Villa.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pooligan on January 31, 2012, 02:12:41 PM
Shame they have signed Bridge,i was hoping they might come in for Warnock.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TimTheVillain on January 31, 2012, 02:23:36 PM
Shame they have signed Bridge,i was hoping they might come in for Warnock.

Me too, but poss Everton need his wages off the payroll to fund that new striker from Rangers and we're saddled with Warnock...
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: VillaAlways on January 31, 2012, 02:27:09 PM
Shame they have signed Bridge,i was hoping they might come in for Warnock.

Me too, but poss Everton need his wages off the payroll to fund that new striker from Rangers and we're saddled with Warnock...
Bridge is a £iteh player isn't he ??
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: UK Redsox on January 31, 2012, 02:36:40 PM
Kelly Smith and Alex Scott are now without a team.

I saw them play last year in Boston and they looked decent players.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Steve kirk on January 31, 2012, 02:53:56 PM
Thread started in early December, congratulations to all posters for managing to get past 200 pages with almost nothing to discuss. :) 
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 31, 2012, 03:01:18 PM
1356: BBC Sport's Pat Murphy reports that there will be no transfer business at Aston Villa. Manager Alex McLeish sais: "I never thought we'd be doing major business and that's proved to be the case." Chairman Randy Lerner has talked of financial stability and McLeish says he understands that.

Predictable but still vaguely depressing.

Get used to it, then, because that's the future for us.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 31, 2012, 03:06:35 PM
So, Sunderland:

Wayne Bridge - in.
Kyrgiacos (lanky Greek donkey) - imminent
Kevin Davies - trying to get him.

Really, he doesn't change, does he?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TheSandman on January 31, 2012, 03:08:23 PM
All with PL experience too.

He's almost become a parody of himself.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 31, 2012, 03:09:45 PM
All with PL experience too.

He's almost become a parody of himself.

No wonder Lerner had that ridiculous "must have PL experience" as the major criteria for a manager, he'd heard MON banging on about it with regard to players for four years.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JUAN PABLO on January 31, 2012, 03:18:42 PM
So, Sunderland:

Wayne Bridge - in.
Kyrgiacos (lanky Greek donkey) - imminent
Kevin Davies - trying to get him.

Really, he doesn't change, does he?

He could have had Warnock , Collins and Heskey  ffs
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 31, 2012, 03:20:36 PM
That's a depressing list of has beens and a never was. That excitement from the Sunderland fans might diminish pretty quick.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 31, 2012, 03:22:05 PM
Apparently '4 clubs' want Keith Andrews, I really really hope we are not one of them. It would be a truly dreadful signing.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 31, 2012, 03:29:24 PM
"We're not going to be bringing people in here this season, especially not this window" - McLeish
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on January 31, 2012, 03:30:53 PM
Apparently '4 clubs' want Keith Andrews, I really really hope we are not one of them. It would be a truly dreadful signing.

I saw a tweet from a Journo yesterday sayng we were interested in him.  It made me feel sick.  I wll throw my season ticket in the bin if we sign him
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Villafirst on January 31, 2012, 03:32:59 PM
"We're not going to be bringing people in here this season, especially not this window" - McLeish

Should read: "We're not going to be bringing people in here this season, especially not this window" - Lerner. I wish he'd sell up to someone who would put money and passion back into the club. Lerner is a waste of space.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TheSandman on January 31, 2012, 03:33:09 PM
"We're not going to be bringing people in here this season, especially not this window" - McLeish

Every cloud has a silver lining.

No Keith Andrews!

Maybe Pubehead wants him as well?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on January 31, 2012, 03:33:35 PM
That's a depressing list of has beens and a never was. That excitement from the Sunderland fans might diminish pretty quick.


nah, they're in the full-on delusional stage at the moment. People forget what it was like on here when he first arrived -  even when he signed complete bobbins it was a masterstroke however shit they were/are
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: timeoutbigbar on January 31, 2012, 03:40:01 PM
That's a depressing list of has beens and a never was. That excitement from the Sunderland fans might diminish pretty quick.


nah, they're in the full-on delusional stage at the moment. People forget what it was like on here when he first arrived -  even when he signed complete bobbins it was a masterstroke however shit they were/are

Habib Beye was Newcastles player of the year.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithesShin on January 31, 2012, 03:44:58 PM
So, Sunderland:

Wayne Bridge - in.
Kyrgiacos (lanky Greek donkey) - imminent
Kevin Davies - trying to get him.

Really, he doesn't change, does he?

I think i'd prefer to be signing no one rather than still signing shite like that.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Sam Smith on January 31, 2012, 03:55:28 PM
You should hear how SSN is praising the astute nature of MON current captures, citing that we might see Bridge in the squad for the Euro's. Other than 'King Kenny' he really is the medias darling!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JUAN PABLO on January 31, 2012, 04:03:26 PM
Roddegella been offered to Villa
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: JUAN PABLO on January 31, 2012, 04:09:07 PM
Is it worth going for Ravel Morrison ??
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pedro25 on January 31, 2012, 04:11:20 PM
Rodallega would be excellent, Keane's off in 3 games and Heskey at the end of the season (hopefully) so Rodallega, Bent and Gabby would be 3 good strikers to start next season with.  He's out of contract at the end of the season so £4m now should do the trick.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TimTheVillain on January 31, 2012, 04:11:39 PM
Shame they have signed Bridge,i was hoping they might come in for Warnock.

Me too, but poss Everton need his wages off the payroll to fund that new striker from Rangers and we're saddled with Warnock...
Bridge is a £iteh player isn't he ??

He is, sorry.

We really should have been in there.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TimTheVillain on January 31, 2012, 04:15:07 PM
Rodallega would be excellent, Keane's off in 3 games and Heskey at the end of the season (hopefully) so Rodallega, Bent and Gabby would be 3 good strikers to start next season with.  He's out of contract at the end of the season so £4m now should do the trick.

I've always rated Rodallega, but we aren't spending a dime me thinks.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 31, 2012, 04:23:57 PM
Rodallega would be excellent, Keane's off in 3 games and Heskey at the end of the season (hopefully) so Rodallega, Bent and Gabby would be 3 good strikers to start next season with.  He's out of contract at the end of the season so £4m now should do the trick.

I've always rated Rodallega, but we aren't spending a dime me thinks.


I don't think we have a dime to spend.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on January 31, 2012, 04:25:53 PM
I'll be very surprised if we add anyone new today. The rationalization is going to extend until we permanently rid ourselves of our remaining old or costly contracts. I fully expect a defensive purge in the summer along with us shedding Beye, Petrov and Heskey.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: FourOaksVillan on January 31, 2012, 04:30:49 PM
Heskey to Barcelona
http://www.skybet.com/cms/breaking-transfer-news.shtm?name=Emile+Heskey (http://www.skybet.com/cms/breaking-transfer-news.shtm?name=Emile+Heskey)

 ;)
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: olaftab on January 31, 2012, 05:50:20 PM
Is it worth going for Ravel Morrison ??
I'd rather  we went  for  Van!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dante Lavelli on January 31, 2012, 05:53:04 PM
Is it worth going for Ravel Morrison ??
I'd rather  we went  for  Van!

Really?  This guy is meant to be the next big thing.  Whilst I doubt he'd stay around long it would be a good chance to buy cheap and sell at a huge profit in two or three years time.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Hoppo on January 31, 2012, 05:54:13 PM
Someone on BBC wishing Agent Ridgewell good luck at Albion after his great job at Small Heath. love it.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: garyshawsknee on January 31, 2012, 06:10:00 PM
Is it worth going for Ravel Morrison ??
I'd rather  we went  for  Van!

Really?  This guy is meant to be the next big thing.  Whilst I doubt he'd stay around long it would be a good chance to buy cheap and sell at a huge profit in two or three years time.

Seems to be a cnut of the highest order,maybe getting out of Manchester may help,moving to London might not.

One good thing about us being quiet this window is that i wont be tempted to sit through SSN for any late deals,and sit through their presenting creaming themselves over a late loan deal that 'arry or some other tube does.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: James on January 31, 2012, 06:19:14 PM
There's a transfer special on BBC News channel at 6.30pm if anyone's interested. I'm not sure what they're going to talk about for half an hour though. Maybe they'll attempt to answer the perplexing question of 'Why the fuck do Spuds want Saha?' Does he come with a dog called Rosie48?  ;)
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: saunders_heroes on January 31, 2012, 06:30:08 PM
There's a transfer special on BBC News channel at 6.30pm if anyone's interested. I'm not sure what they're going to talk about for half an hour though. Maybe they'll attempt to answer the perplexing question of 'Why the fuck do Spuds want Saha?' Does he come with a dog called Rosie48?  ;)


I hope they're not gonna go all 'Jim White' on us.
"IT'S TRANSFER DEADLINE DAAAAY!!!!"
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: richardhubbard on January 31, 2012, 06:44:02 PM
Is it worth going for Ravel Morrison ??
I'd rather  we went  for  Van!

Really?  This guy is meant to be the next big thing.  Whilst I doubt he'd stay around long it would be a good chance to buy cheap and sell at a huge profit in two or three years time.

Seems to be a cnut of the highest order,maybe getting out of Manchester may help,moving to London might not.

One good thing about us being quiet this window is that i wont be tempted to sit through SSN for any late deals,and sit through their presenting creaming themselves over a late loan deal that 'arry or some other tube does.


His a knob of highest order, thinks he is Maradona.

Apparantly rumour are from Man United fans that this guy has issues with people in the city and needs to leave.

Makes Lee Hendrie look like a clever lad
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Hoppo on January 31, 2012, 07:21:52 PM
Heskey to Sunderland (well its on sky text)
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 31, 2012, 07:22:05 PM
Bobby Zamora - 90k a week. Christ alive thats just total insanity.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 31, 2012, 07:23:14 PM
I would actually swap Heskey loan for Gardner loan for the rest of the season, the latter will give more of a goal threat too.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: phantom limb on January 31, 2012, 07:27:32 PM
I didn't expect us to buy anyone but it would have been nice to remove some of the guff that we're still having to pay until their contracts run out at the end of the season.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: MarkM on January 31, 2012, 07:28:37 PM
I think they should bring back Swap Shop for footballers.

Mind you the way things are going around here we would swap Bent for some magic beans
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 31, 2012, 07:32:17 PM
West Brom agree fee for Keith Andrews, go there Keith.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Somniloquism on January 31, 2012, 07:50:07 PM
I've just seen the SSN advert for transfer deadline day. Totally shite, they take their best assets (the women) and hide them in coveralls to do an assault course.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Jimmy Smash on January 31, 2012, 07:54:57 PM
Bobby Zamora - 90k a week. Christ alive thats just total insanity.

As we go others will surely follow.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Jimmy Smash on January 31, 2012, 07:58:08 PM
Paul McShane is staying at Crystal Palace for the rest of the season. At least he won't be coming to the holiday camp that is Aston Villa. Hi De Hi.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Somniloquism on January 31, 2012, 08:06:12 PM
Paul McShane is staying at Crystal Palace for the rest of the season. At least he won't be coming to the holiday camp that is Aston Villa. Hi De Hi.

Bloody hell, were we linked to him. If the problem with our defenders are that they dive in recklessly, give away unnecessary fouls and pens, and just run around like headless chickens, McShane would have fitted right in.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: crewster73 on January 31, 2012, 08:10:25 PM
Hearing that Heskey to Sunderland is a done deal 🙏
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SheffieldVillain on January 31, 2012, 08:11:55 PM
Hearing that Heskey to Sunderland is a done deal

Stop it. I've had enough this week of Villa related incidents where my hopes are raised only to be dashed.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: crewster73 on January 31, 2012, 08:14:56 PM
I know don't want to get hopes up because it could be bullshit but you never know
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Jimmy Smash on January 31, 2012, 08:15:46 PM
But who will the opposition fans laugh at?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TheSandman on January 31, 2012, 08:17:12 PM
The four clowns at the back?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: AvFc4eVeR on January 31, 2012, 08:21:59 PM
Marvin Sordell has been withdrawn from Watfords starting line up tonight, and there are rumours he is in talks with Villa and a Championship side.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: KevinGage on January 31, 2012, 08:22:54 PM
Hearing that Heskey to Sunderland is a done deal 🙏

Charles N'Zeddy just spotted on the Wearmouth Bridge smoking jazz cigarettes.

About to complete his long awaited move to the Mighty Blackcats?   (or 'Martin O'Neill's Sunderland,' as you guys have now been re-christened   ;)    )
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TheSandman on January 31, 2012, 08:24:09 PM
Sordell would be interesting. He's only 20 and from what I gather fairly well thought of.

If he replaces Hesk, so much the better!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Jimmy Smash on January 31, 2012, 08:28:10 PM
Sordell would be interesting. He's only 20 and from what I gather fairly well thought of.

If he replaces Hesk, so much the better!

He'd cost around £5M. No chance.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 31, 2012, 08:32:24 PM
Bolton need a striker
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: crewster73 on January 31, 2012, 08:34:15 PM
Hearing that Heskey to Sunderland is a done deal 🙏

Charles N'Zeddy just spotted on the Wearmouth Bridge smoking jazz cigarettes.

About to complete his long awaited move to the Mighty Blackcats?   (or 'Martin O'Neill's Sunderland,' as you guys have now been re-christened   ;)    )
you've got the wrong end of the stick mate. I am Villa moved up North 4 years ago. Just heard a rumour that we might get rid of the big lump. Like I said could be BS
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: KevinGage on January 31, 2012, 08:38:02 PM
Ok chap apologies.

I've had my prayer mat and Rosary beads out since I first heard the rumour a few hours ago too.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Aston Manor on January 31, 2012, 08:39:09 PM
Not sure why but I reckon Sordell will end up at Norwich.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: crewster73 on January 31, 2012, 08:41:50 PM
Ok chap apologies.

I've had my prayer mat and Rosary beads out since I first heard the rumour a few hours ago too.
No offence taken pal. Only a few more hours until we can't sign Carlton Palmer!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 31, 2012, 08:52:59 PM
Not sure why but I reckon Sordell will end up at Norwich.

Gone to Bolton.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: spangley1812 on January 31, 2012, 08:55:27 PM
Not sure why but I reckon Sordell will end up at Norwich.

Gone to Bolton.

£3 million
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: AvFc4eVeR on January 31, 2012, 08:57:36 PM
Not sure why but I reckon Sordell will end up at Norwich.

Gone to Bolton.

£3 million

Could be bargain in long term
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 31, 2012, 08:57:57 PM
Called that well then
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Chris Smith on January 31, 2012, 08:58:31 PM
Not sure why but I reckon Sordell will end up at Norwich.

Gone to Bolton.

Sat Nav failure?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulWinch again on January 31, 2012, 09:02:10 PM
I didn't expect anything this window, but we genuinely need a massive overhaul in the summer.  Beye, Heskey, Cuellar, Warnock, Dunne, Petrov all leaving(I'd like Hutton to go but can't see it). We need two centre halves, at least one full back, a creative player and a centre mid at the very least.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Aston Manor on January 31, 2012, 09:04:33 PM
I meant Bolton! Lol.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Somniloquism on January 31, 2012, 10:14:01 PM
They just cut to Jim White at the end of the game.

"Are you expecting a busy last hour Jim?"

"Yes, I expect a lot of business to be done" but in more of a pleading please let it be so rather then shouty man style he normally does.

TBH we seem to have had less Eastie as well for the last few weeks. Is there a correlation there?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: myf on January 31, 2012, 10:51:43 PM
I thought everton were skint. how can they afford 5.5m for a striker on a 4.5 yr deal?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: dave.woodhall on January 31, 2012, 10:54:22 PM
I thought everton were skint. how can they afford 5.5m for a striker on a 4.5 yr deal?

They've just sold one for £6 million.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ozzjim on January 31, 2012, 10:56:18 PM
Is heskey still here??
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Gareth on January 31, 2012, 10:58:38 PM
2 minutes till the start of the Summer Transfer Thread???
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: myf on January 31, 2012, 10:59:54 PM
I thought everton were skint. how can they afford 5.5m for a striker on a 4.5 yr deal?

They've just sold one for £6 million.

But i thought they had loads of debt to service.  the new deal will be a big outlay in wages as well - i would estimate at least another 5m
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: olaftab on January 31, 2012, 11:00:24 PM
Just drove past VP lights still on and I could hear a fax machine whining away! Titus Bramble was leaving and Zat Knight waiting to go in!
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: brontebilly on January 31, 2012, 11:23:06 PM
I didn't expect anything this window, but we genuinely need a massive overhaul in the summer.  Beye, Heskey, Cuellar, Warnock, Dunne, Petrov all leaving(I'd like Hutton to go but can't see it). We need two centre halves, at least one full back, a creative player and a centre mid at the very least.

Dunne is our best defender. Think it would be madness to sell him. No issue with any of the others leaving though we will be reclaiming sweet f*ck all in transfer fees from that lot. Might be worth keeping Petrov on for another season.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: luke25 on January 31, 2012, 11:25:36 PM
I didn't expect anything this window, but we genuinely need a massive overhaul in the summer.  Beye, Heskey, Cuellar, Warnock, Dunne, Petrov all leaving(I'd like Hutton to go but can't see it). We need two centre halves, at least one full back, a creative player and a centre mid at the very least.

Dunne is our best defender.
Which says it all.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 31, 2012, 11:34:22 PM
Good Lord.

Ryan Nelsen and Louis Saha.

Is the court case getting to Arry?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SoccerHQ on January 31, 2012, 11:34:45 PM
I'm noting with interest the length of deals some of these players are getting.

Saha gone to Spurs and given 18 month contract, Ridgwell gone to WBA and interestingly only been given a 2 and a half year deal.

We sign Heskey aged 31 and give him a THREE and a half year deal. Plus the infamous 3 year deal Beye was somehow given.

No wonder we're in a mess financially when you look at the contracts other player are getting.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 31, 2012, 11:36:32 PM
I'm noting with interest the length of deals some of these players are getting.

Saha gone to Spurs and given 18 month contract, Ridgwell gone to WBA and interestingly only been given a 2 and a half year deal.

We sign Heskey aged 31 and give him a THREE and a half year deal. Plus the infamous 3 year deal Beye was somehow given.

No wonder we're in a mess financially when you look at the contracts other player are getting.

Saha has got a deal till the end of the season.

However, you're bang on about Heskey.

Two people need shooting for that. Firstly, MON, for being so fucking lazy and myopic in the transfer market. Secondly, Lerner, for not thinking "hang on, so we'll be paying this big fucking plank 65k a week till he's 35 years old?"
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Somniloquism on January 31, 2012, 11:37:21 PM
I'm noting with interest the length of deals some of these players are getting.

Saha gone to Spurs and given 18 month contract, Ridgwell gone to WBA and interestingly only been given a 2 and a half year deal.

We sign Heskey aged 31 and give him a THREE and a half year deal. Plus the infamous 3 year deal Beye was somehow given.

No wonder we're in a mess financially when you look at the contracts other player are getting.

And yet some fans say we don't give long enough contracts. And with the ridgewell, baggies obviously think they will be down by then and will need to offload asap
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on January 31, 2012, 11:45:02 PM
I'm noting with interest the length of deals some of these players are getting.

Saha gone to Spurs and given 18 month contract, Ridgwell gone to WBA and interestingly only been given a 2 and a half year deal.

We sign Heskey aged 31 and give him a THREE and a half year deal. Plus the infamous 3 year deal Beye was somehow given.

No wonder we're in a mess financially when you look at the contracts other player are getting.

And yet some fans say we don't give long enough contracts. And with the ridgewell, baggies obviously think they will be down by then and will need to offload asap

There's a difference between giving a five year contract to a Milner, Young or Downing, and given a long contract to an ageing plank like Heskey.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PaulMcGrathsNo5Shirt on January 31, 2012, 11:58:05 PM
210 pages for a Robbie Keane loan and kid from Ireland who nobody had heard of before.

How quickly things have changed.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on February 01, 2012, 12:00:20 AM
ah well.

I think this was a case of be careful whatyou wish for.

We may have a chairman so still frozen in shock after MON he'll never spend again unless forced to by dire circumstances, but at least most of our worse possible nightmare January scenario signings couldn't happen as they're already here.......

nite nite..
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SoccerHQ on February 01, 2012, 12:00:54 AM
Yes, no player over 30-31 should get more than 2 years unless Messi fancies playing here when he's 32.

Actually Given got a 5 year deal but I would make a special case with keepers as they do have longevity.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: paul_e on February 01, 2012, 12:19:36 AM
Yes, no player over 30-31 should get more than 2 years unless Messi fancies playing here when he's 32.

Actually Given got a 5 year deal but I would make a special case with keepers as they do have longevity.

I think that's too long as well, should've been 3 with an option for a 4th season in my opinion.  Outfield players I agree, 30 can just about go for a 3year deal but nothing more than 2 after that.  Under 23 and paying more than 5-6m should be a 5year deal, just to make sure they don't get to 26 and leave on the cheap just as they're hitting their peak.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SoccerHQ on February 01, 2012, 12:24:07 AM
Yep, we signed Beye at 32 and gave him the 3 year deal and Heskey of course and yet when we signed Milner he only got a 4 year deal.

Bizarre.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: AvFc4eVeR on February 01, 2012, 12:27:55 AM
From BBC website;

Here's Swansea boss Brendan Rodgers on his new signing from Wrexham, 22-year-old right-back Curtis Obeng: "Technically he can deal with the ball, he's calm in possession and passes it well. He has great, great pace. And no doubt mentally he is hungry and I like hungry players that have a point to prove and want to get better."

Take note Mr Lerner, if you were in any doubt, this is the type of manager we want, and the type of player he is describing, is what we should be signing in every transfer window.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: usav on February 01, 2012, 01:03:33 AM
Ridgewell to Albion.  How many other players have played for Villa, Blues and the Baggies?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Dante Lavelli on February 01, 2012, 01:13:53 AM
From BBC website;

Here's Swansea boss Brendan Rodgers on his new signing from Wrexham, 22-year-old right-back Curtis Obeng: "Technically he can deal with the ball, he's calm in possession and passes it well. He has great, great pace. And no doubt mentally he is hungry and I like hungry players that have a point to prove and want to get better."

Take note Mr Lerner, if you were in any doubt, this is the type of manager we want, and the type of player he is describing, is what we should be signing in every transfer window.

You're not wrong.  His teams play great football too.
He was schooled under Mourinho, so he should have seen how thorough you need to be in order to really excel.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on February 01, 2012, 01:26:21 AM
I agree, he'd be great to bring the kids through into an environment of good football too. Which is essential.

I like McLeish but he doesn't play the kind of football I like. And neither did MON for that matter. The odd game aside, I havent really truly gushed about how we play since the days of Ron Atkinson and Brian Little. I'd love to consistently watch attractive and effective football again. But who wouldn't?

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rigadon on February 01, 2012, 07:15:23 AM
I agree, he'd be great to bring the kids through into an environment of good football too. Which is essential.

I like McLeish but he doesn't play the kind of football I like. And neither did MON for that matter. The odd game aside, I havent really truly gushed about how we play since the days of Ron Atkinson and Brian Little. I'd love to consistently watch attractive and effective football again. But who wouldn't?



Pretty much how I see it.  I think that's also how most of us see it actually which means the whole 'fickle' thing is mostly a load of old bollox. 
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Ian. on February 01, 2012, 07:30:12 AM
From BBC website;

Here's Swansea boss Brendan Rodgers on his new signing from Wrexham, 22-year-old right-back Curtis Obeng: "Technically he can deal with the ball, he's calm in possession and passes it well. He has great, great pace. And no doubt mentally he is hungry and I like hungry players that have a point to prove and want to get better."

Take note Mr Lerner, if you were in any doubt, this is the type of manager we want, and the type of player he is describing, is what we should be signing in every transfer window.

You're not wrong.  His teams play great football too.
He was schooled under Mourinho, so he should have seen how thorough you need to be in order to really excel.
Well they did try for Martinez I thought. Maybe not hard enough.
He would have been a gamble but so would any young manager. To be honest every manager is a gamble and in that matter any player too, You only have to look at Chelsea at the moment and see their boss and also Torres.

Changing subject what the hell has happened to the bbc website this morning. A bit bit bloody bright.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Phil from the upper holte on February 01, 2012, 07:31:54 AM
Can we lock this shite now :)
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: adamski villa on February 01, 2012, 07:37:42 AM
at least my boy got his dream move to Barcelona http://www.skybet.com/cms/breaking-transfer-news.shtm?name=9+yr+old+Josh+Consterdine
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Yossarian on February 01, 2012, 08:18:16 AM
Ridgewell to Albion.  How many other players have played for Villa, Blues and the Baggies?

Kevin Phillips is the last one I remember.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on February 01, 2012, 08:22:54 AM
Be interesting to know if we had some late offers for any of our lot. Presumably, the reason we didn't buy, is we couldn't shift anyone.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: DB on February 01, 2012, 08:31:50 AM
Ridgewell to Albion.  How many other players have played for Villa, Blues and the Baggies?

Kevin Phillips is the last one I remember.


Curtis Davies.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: PeterWithe on February 01, 2012, 08:42:01 AM
Good Lord.

Ryan Nelsen and Louis Saha.

Is the court case getting to Arry?

Perhaps he's going to try for a late insanity plea?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: glasses on February 01, 2012, 08:53:20 AM
I'm noting with interest the length of deals some of these players are getting.

Saha gone to Spurs and given 18 month contract, Ridgwell gone to WBA and interestingly only been given a 2 and a half year deal.

We sign Heskey aged 31 and give him a THREE and a half year deal. Plus the infamous 3 year deal Beye was somehow given.

No wonder we're in a mess financially when you look at the contracts other player are getting.

Saha has got a deal till the end of the season.

However, you're bang on about Heskey.

Two people need shooting for that. Firstly, MON, for being so fucking lazy and myopic in the transfer market. Secondly, Lerner, for not thinking "hang on, so we'll be paying this big fucking plank 65k a week till he's 35 years old?"
PF takes a big chunk of the blame for me for negotiating with the agents, which is his job is it not? Lerner for trusting Faulkner so much, and O'Neill for wanting Heskey in the first place.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: David_Nab on February 01, 2012, 09:16:23 AM
Definitely a slow down in the market this season and whilst I would have liked to get some players in , if Spurs who could still win the league and look dead cert for a top four place can only get loans in after shifting some player's then it show's where the league is at right now.

I'm sure once we clear some deadwood we will buy players in the summer ..and thi stime hopefully give out more realstic wages and contract lengths
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: themossman on February 01, 2012, 09:17:07 AM
After a predictable non event of a transfer window, I've been wondering this morning where we would be now if Houllier had stayed. Was the plan then really to fund an overhaul of the team as it seemed to be? Or was all the talk of new continental signings just idle speculation? In other words did Houllier leaving mark a further lowering of expectations from Lerner or was he really here to do the same shitty hatchet job AM is doing?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Matt C on February 01, 2012, 09:17:13 AM
50% of the money spent in January exchanged hands on the last day - says something about the transfer window.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: ROBBO on February 01, 2012, 09:23:40 AM
After a predictable non event of a transfer window, I've been wondering this morning where we would be now if Houllier had stayed. Was the plan then really to fund an overhaul of the team as it seemed to be? Or was all the talk of new continental signings just idle speculation? In other words did Houllier leaving mark a further lowering of expectations from Lerner or was he really here to do the same shitty hatchet job AM is doing?

I think he would have moved quicker but in the same direction, he was better connected to get cheaper imports.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on February 01, 2012, 09:27:52 AM
Is it time to lock this thread down as it will only get more depressing considering the lack of movement we had :-(
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: MarkM on February 01, 2012, 09:30:46 AM

I'm sure once we clear some deadwood we will buy players in the summer ..and thi stime hopefully give out more realstic wages and contract lengths

I'm not so sure, I dont get the impression that we are cutting back now in order to spend later.

I think this is a 5 year strategy of spending very little and trying to hand onto PL status.

That is what they saw in McL a manger who can operate under those constraints. [If he can do it is another question]

I will be very suprised if we spend much in the next transfer window, we will continue to reduce the squad size down but add very little
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on February 01, 2012, 09:34:10 AM
After a predictable non event of a transfer window, I've been wondering this morning where we would be now if Houllier had stayed. Was the plan then really to fund an overhaul of the team as it seemed to be? Or was all the talk of new continental signings just idle speculation? In other words did Houllier leaving mark a further lowering of expectations from Lerner or was he really here to do the same shitty hatchet job AM is doing?


Think he wouldn't have joined if he'd been offered the same remit as AM. Its very clear that whats happening now is far more than a general lowering of the wage bill, more cuts across the board to a club size smaller than before MON arrived. And they've been very disingenuous the way they've hid that behind this wage bill smokescreen

Just as they didn't have a clue what they were doing when we had the money, its looking increasingly the same position now we're potless. The whole club's strategy seems to be fixed on some short-sighted phoenix like rise from the ashes based on our youth team and its not gonna happen - with luck 1 or 2 of the current crop will be top players, the rest average plodders at best.


The future's bleak.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TimTheVillain on February 01, 2012, 09:38:37 AM
And Barcelona spent more on ONE player than Randy spent on buying the whole of our club.

Quite amazing.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: RickySlade on February 01, 2012, 09:41:14 AM
Didn't Garry Thompson also play for Villa-Baggies-Blues?  Actually, I'm not sure if I can recall him playing for small heath.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: themossman on February 01, 2012, 09:41:39 AM
The problem is that's a false choice because if we try and stay still we will go backwards, and on the form of this and last season we are not far off being in real danger. If that really is the plan and we don't replace some of the higher earners with decent, Nzogbia-level singings then Bent, our last big player, will go. We will end up in a self perpetuating spiral of losing players, dropping places, finding it harder to recruit, having to pay more to get out of it. That is why I have to believe Randy, even if he is entirely self interested, won't run us into the ground like that.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: MarkM on February 01, 2012, 09:45:02 AM
The problem is that's a false choice because if we try and stay still we will go backwards, and on the form of this and last season we are not far off being in real danger. If that really is the plan and we don't replace some of the higher earners with decent, Nzogbia-level singings then Bent, our last big player, will go. We will end up in a self perpetuating spiral of losing players, dropping places, finding it harder to recruit, having to pay more to get out of it. That is why I have to believe Randy, even if he is entirely self interested, won't run us into the ground like that.

I'm sure Ellis didnt want to run is into the ground in the lead up to 86/87 but it happened anyway. [or maybe he did???]

Things can tend to run away from you if you are not careful.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on February 01, 2012, 09:50:00 AM
The problem is that's a false choice because if we try and stay still we will go backwards, and on the form of this and last season we are not far off being in real danger. If that really is the plan and we don't replace some of the higher earners with decent, Nzogbia-level singings then Bent, our last big player, will go. We will end up in a self perpetuating spiral of losing players, dropping places, finding it harder to recruit, having to pay more to get out of it. That is why I have to believe Randy, even if he is entirely self interested, won't run us into the ground like that.


I think Randy's convinced himself with the fairplay rules that this is the way to go.  It's very reminiscent of the Ellis one where he was sure all the clubs spending money would go under like Leeds leaving Villa to take their rightful place at the top of the tree. That ended up with him posting massive (for him) losses and having to sell. I can't see this ending up any better. As you say, its ever-decreasing circles.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: themossman on February 01, 2012, 09:55:07 AM
Very true. Ironic that we ended up with Ellis redux when we thought we were getting the opposite. Although  maybe not surprising considering he hand picked him.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on February 01, 2012, 09:58:10 AM
Randy has definitly taken advise from Doug as I remember doug coming on talksport on the breakfast show sining Alex Mcleish's praise and still believed Villa would be a force in the coming years and priased our youngster like they were the best thing since slice bread.  Now, im not saying our youngsters / young men are crap but to believe that they are world beaters is a bit naive
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on February 01, 2012, 10:06:08 AM
Very worrying if that's the case. Ellis still goes on about that team he "bred", like its still possible to do now. If it was, ManU, Liverpool, chelsea etc... would all be doing it. Only have to look at clubs like West ham to see where a constant supply of talented youngsters gets you nowadays - relegated with their youngsters playing for the top clubs
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Merv on February 01, 2012, 10:18:00 AM
Someone made a valid point about the UEFA Fairplay guidelines the other day - of course, they only affect you if you're playing in European competition.

Anyway, the point about Swansea signing the lad from Wrexham - he sounds technically capable, a good example of a club signing perhaps the right kind of footballer. But I'll guess we have some players/defenders of that ability in our reserves already - it's just whether we have the manager/coaching staff/ethos in place to give these players a chance and exposure to PL football.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: themossman on February 01, 2012, 10:24:00 AM
The careful custodian spiel would have a bit more credibility if Lerner hadn't already let MON try the throw-money-away-on-mediocre-players approach.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Risso on February 01, 2012, 10:46:29 AM
The Fair Play rules are just a smokescreen for Lerner's lack of interest. The rules allow for losses to be offset by injections of equity by the owner. Lerner has just ballsed it all up, and is now implementing emergency austerity measures.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on February 01, 2012, 11:44:51 AM
The FFP rules are a joke.  Can you imagine what the sponsors of the CL would say if UEFA decided to punish Real Mardrid, Barca and Man utd from the competition?  they would go mad as they are the biggest teams in europe! 
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Hoppo on February 01, 2012, 11:52:14 AM
McLeish is promising new signings in the summer.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: N'ZMAV on February 01, 2012, 11:57:35 AM
Rodallega would be excellent, Keane's off in 3 games and Heskey at the end of the season (hopefully) so Rodallega, Bent and Gabby would be 3 good strikers to start next season with.  He's out of contract at the end of the season so £4m now should do the trick.
I like Rodallega, he's a decent player. But, his goal scoring record isn't that good, is it? Ok, I admit, he is playing in a poor side, who don't create too many chances. I think once Keane has gone we'll probably see more of Ireland in an advanced middle position, and I'm hoping Gabby and N'Zogbia will be in good form.

Delfouneso is the interesting one for me....
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: stubbsyandy on February 01, 2012, 12:00:31 PM
Randy has definitly taken advise from Doug as I remember doug coming on talksport on the breakfast show sining Alex Mcleish's praise and still believed Villa would be a force in the coming years and priased our youngster like they were the best thing since slice bread.  Now, im not saying our youngsters / young men are crap but to believe that they are world beaters is a bit naive

One thing Doug is not is naive..
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: N'ZMAV on February 01, 2012, 12:01:59 PM
If we're looking at wingers & attacking options in the summer, I'd be looking at Victor Moses, looked really good when I've seen him so far this season. Also, the wingers at Swansea look good too, Sinclair and Dyer.

Also, Ryan Nelsen would have been useful for us till the end of the season after Blackburn cancelled his contract.

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Rick_avfc on February 01, 2012, 12:03:13 PM
Randy has definitly taken advise from Doug as I remember doug coming on talksport on the breakfast show sining Alex Mcleish's praise and still believed Villa would be a force in the coming years and priased our youngster like they were the best thing since slice bread.  Now, im not saying our youngsters / young men are crap but to believe that they are world beaters is a bit naive

One thing Doug is not is naive..

Maybe not but believing our current crop of youth players are good enough to challenge at the top of the league is a joke.  im sorry - i hope im proven wrong, i really do so i can eat my own words and get abuse from people but I cannot see it happening, ever.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Hoppo on February 01, 2012, 12:12:02 PM
Forget Rodallega. James McCarthy is the player to get from Wigan.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on February 01, 2012, 12:50:32 PM
Very worrying if that's the case. Ellis still goes on about that team he "bred", like its still possible to do now. If it was, ManU, Liverpool, chelsea etc... would all be doing it. Only have to look at clubs like West ham to see where a constant supply of talented youngsters gets you nowadays - relegated with their youngsters playing for the top clubs

Why not use the example of the Man Utd sides of the early mid 90s onwards? The team that swept all before them was mostly brought through their own ranks. I dont recall too many relegations with Arsenal using their academy players either. Plenty of champions league adventures mind you.

Now I'm not saying a club should rely solely on its academy but it should be the cornerstone to a successful dynasty and its the only way, short of rule changes and mega-rich backing, that Villa will ever be successful again. If we cant produce our own top players we certainly aren't going to go out and buy them from under the noses of Chelsea, Man City et al are we?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on February 01, 2012, 01:02:33 PM
Very worrying if that's the case. Ellis still goes on about that team he "bred", like its still possible to do now. If it was, ManU, Liverpool, chelsea etc... would all be doing it. Only have to look at clubs like West ham to see where a constant supply of talented youngsters gets you nowadays - relegated with their youngsters playing for the top clubs

Why not use the example of the Man Utd sides of the early mid 90s onwards? The team that swept all before them was mostly brought through their own ranks. I dont recall too many relegations with Arsenal using their academy players either. Plenty of champions league adventures mind you.

Now I'm not saying a club should rely solely on its academy but it should be the cornerstone to a successful dynasty and its the only way, short of rule changes and mega-rich backing, that Villa will ever be successful again. If we cant produce our own top players we certainly aren't going to go out and buy them from under the noses of Chelsea, Man City et al are we?

ManU did it 15+ years ago and haven't done owt since and frankly manu could promise them trophies and money. You know the score Mazrim, if Bannon or Gardner for example make the grade they'll be off.  They may be loyal to the club but they're not insane. They're not gonna hang around for four or five seasons watching the circus that is Warnock, Hutton and co, keeping us mid-table so you have to get in the top places fast or you loose them which means big spending. Even when we went the money route and paid good wages, it took the big clubs less than 3 years to poach all our best players barring gabby.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Brend'Watkins on February 01, 2012, 01:23:11 PM
Forget Rodallega. James McCarthy is the player to get from Wigan.


He looks a half decent player he does.   
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on February 01, 2012, 01:26:26 PM
I see your point but Greg then in answer I'd say it's still the best route to success. You have to keep producing the players and it's up to the club to keep them at Villa but even if some of the good ones leave they go for money. Money helps.

I don't know about "not done owt since" by the way. They still bring youngsters through to their first team from the youth set up. As do Liverpool, Arsenal, Man City, Chelsea and so on.
It will never be anything other than the right thing to do.

What we have to do is bring our best youngsters through and buy smarter in the transfer market to compliment them. Use whatever money we do have to best effect.
For instance I'd rather have 7 talented youngsters and 4 experienced quality players on the pitch than 3 youngsters and 8 mediocre players. Just an example.

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Risso on February 01, 2012, 01:37:26 PM
Greg's right. The Man U team of 15 years ago attracted the best kids because Ferguson went round personally signing the likes of Scoles and Beckham.  We have some decent kids, but nobody that special (with the possible exception of Gardner jnr) but we've had loads of kids who have promised much as kids but not fully delivered on that promise, eg the Moores, Delfouneso, Davis, Ridgewell etc. Mostly the few youngsters who have broken through are decent mid table quality, but that's it, and I can't honestly see the likes of Albrighton, Clark or Bannan improving on that.

The only top quality players we've had come through the youth team in the last 15 years or so have been Barry, Gabby and Cahill.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Greg N'Ash on February 01, 2012, 01:39:16 PM
I'd agree that blooding youth players so they have a chance to make the grade is the way to go Maz but it needs to be backed up with substantial funds as well or it will end in tears for us at least, if not for Lerner's bank manager. I just don't want to be watching Gardner and Bannon in 5 years time playing each other in the Manchester derby
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: FatSam on February 01, 2012, 02:37:43 PM
McLeish is promising new signings in the summer.

Its very easy for AM to promise new signings in the summer. Cuellar, Heskey, Beye, Guzan, and Marshall will be off the wage bill, as will Keane and Jenas. I can't see any of those except the keepers being re-signed, which means the squad will be 3/5 players lighter straight away, without any enquiries from other teams for other players. The numbers just wouldn't stack up if we didn't make any signings.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on February 01, 2012, 02:42:15 PM
Greg's right. The Man U team of 15 years ago attracted the best kids because Ferguson went round personally signing the likes of Scoles and Beckham.  We have some decent kids, but nobody that special (with the possible exception of Gardner jnr) but we've had loads of kids who have promised much as kids but not fully delivered on that promise, eg the Moores, Delfouneso, Davis, Ridgewell etc. Mostly the few youngsters who have broken through are decent mid table quality, but that's it, and I can't honestly see the likes of Albrighton, Clark or Bannan improving on that.

The only top quality players we've had come through the youth team in the last 15 years or so have been Barry, Gabby and Cahill.

We've gone around getting the best players we can find for our academy, it's no different. The suggestion was that a constant supply of talented youngsters gets you relegated with your best players leaving. Are you saying that's right?

There are no certainties. And whilst I dont agree with your appraisal of some of the youngsters we have (and I have one eye on the current U16 - U19s and the quality is improving in my opinion and yes, some may be "that special") simply producing premier league players is a fantastic achievment without which we would be looking to buy several more players and that would be disastrous for us right now.

The sales of 3 academy graduates who might be an example of those critical of the youth system - Craig Gardner, Luke Moore and Liam Ridgewell paid for Ashley Young for instance.
Alright, so we sold him (for twice what we paid) and we're making a bollocks of first team matters right now but hopefully that kind of business will be better handled in the future.

I dont recall hearing Fergie chasing Beckham for instance. He signed schoolboy terms for United at 14 or something and was on a YTS scheme.
What we are trying to do is no different to what Utd did in the early 90s. It may or may not pay off but it's the best chance we have. Get the best youngsters you can find, coach them to the best ability you can, provide the best facilities you can, bring them through to play with top players (who we keep hold of).
We're getting it mostly right. It will hopefully improve too.

I'll tell you one thing. We're getting a reputation as a club that champions youngsters. One that brings them through all the way. When we're going after the stars of tomorrow and hoping they'll choose us that will definitely help. Maybe even in favour of some bigger clubs.

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Hoppo on February 01, 2012, 02:43:08 PM
No new contracts for any of them. We still got Given in on 60k aweek for 5years so you would think getting 3/4 players is possible.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TheSandman on February 01, 2012, 03:10:05 PM
Forget Rodallega. James McCarthy is the player to get from Wigan.

How much would he cost? £5/6million? We should have signed him ages ago when he was going to Wigan as a youngster going for just over a million. I was raving about him on here at the time and he was seen as probably the outstanding young player in Scotland at the time so it wasn't as if he was somebody nobody had heard of.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TimTheVillain on February 01, 2012, 04:20:49 PM
McLeish is promising new signings in the summer.

Where ??
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: pauliewalnuts on February 01, 2012, 05:02:07 PM
McLeish is promising new signings in the summer.

Where ??

QPR
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: KevinGage on February 01, 2012, 05:47:27 PM
Anyone think Given might be on the move in the summer? 

He's been outstanding this season, better than I expected in all honesty.

I always knew he was decent, but until you see a player week in week out you never know for sure.  Hope it's not Dunne syndrome - one good season and then phoning it in. But Given is a better professional, so that's unlikely.

He'd be better than Friedel and Gomes at Tottingham, but I wouldn't be surprised to see him link up with Hughes again at QPR.  They need a decent keeper and we sell our best players.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Hoppo on February 01, 2012, 05:49:48 PM
Its in the Evening Mail..
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Mazrim on February 02, 2012, 09:33:49 AM
I do wonder about these takeover rumours.
I dont see what will be so different in the summer that we can spend money again, especially as we could really have done with one or two defenders this season. O.K some players will be off/out of contract and their salary will be available to new players but there just seems more to it than that.

And when he was asked about signings he said "it's not for me to say". Which I found quite odd.
Maybe clucthing at straws but there you go.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: N'ZMAV on February 02, 2012, 09:37:28 AM
Get a few big earners off the wage bill this summer and it'll be a difference story.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Concrete John on February 02, 2012, 12:34:09 PM
I do wonder about these takeover rumours.
I dont see what will be so different in the summer that we can spend money again, especially as we could really have done with one or two defenders this season. O.K some players will be off/out of contract and their salary will be available to new players but there just seems more to it than that.

And when he was asked about signings he said "it's not for me to say". Which I found quite odd.
Maybe clucthing at straws but there you go.

It may be that simple.

Transfer fees are capital assets that should, if spent wisely, add to the value of the club.  Wages are just money leaking out, so don't.  I can see how Randy would be prepared to invest in good players (think of the profit on Ash, Milner & Downing) with the balance of the wages being where he wants. 

Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: IRISHPHIL on February 19, 2012, 07:06:27 PM
victor wanya(celtic midfilder ) should be 1st signing in summer along with a centre back and left back
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: SoccerHQ on February 19, 2012, 07:44:28 PM
We're being linked with a few SPL players at the minute....no doubt with Rangers in trouble Steven Davis will come back on the radar I hope not. We've also been linked with Lee Wallace who's a left back for them.

At Celtic links have been floated with Emilo Izzaguirre, Ki, Bayram Kayal...could any of them step into the prem?
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: TheSandman on February 19, 2012, 08:10:10 PM
Wanyama was supposedly coming here but went to Celtic when that fell through. I'm not sure about him. He's athletic and versatile but not classy enough as a midfielder for me. He's had a few good games at centre half for them but I wouldn't see that as his best position.

Ki is classy, desperate for a move to England and might be very good as an attacking midfielder. But we have Stephen Ireland and I'm not sure he could handle a step up. He seems a bit light weight.

I really like Kayal. Classy on the ball and good at tackling. Would be an ideal replacement for Petrov but he's had a lot of bad luck with injuries this season.

Izaguirre is only just back from injury but is a good attacking fullback.

Problem is that they would want top dollar for all of them. Not sure who I'd take from Rangers. The best they've got is Davis.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Toronto Villa on February 19, 2012, 08:13:19 PM
We're being linked with a few SPL players at the minute....no doubt with Rangers in trouble Steven Davis will come back on the radar I hope not. We've also been linked with Lee Wallace who's a left back for them.

At Celtic links have been floated with Emilo Izzaguirre, Ki, Bayram Kayal...could any of them step into the prem?

fuck me. At least under Houllier we signed Bent and Makoun, got Walker on loan and were linked with a number of foreign players both established and up and coming. I will kill myself if once again we decide to ignore the market outside fo the UK. I do however find solace in the fact that McLeish in his time with shit did bring in Martens, Hleb, Zarate and a couple of other lads from abroad. So he might not be afraid to cast his net wider especially as there is more value than staying with vastly overpriced domestic players.
Title: Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
Post by: Smoke on February 19, 2012, 09:15:48 PM
If we're going to sign anyone from the SPL it should be James Forrest from Celtic.
SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal