collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Jacob Ramsey - Gone by olaftab
[Today at 03:10:49 PM]


Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by olaftab
[Today at 03:08:55 PM]


FFP by tomd2103
[Today at 02:59:10 PM]


Tyrone Mings by Toronto Villa
[Today at 02:56:31 PM]


Damian Vidagany - Director of Football by Hookeysmith
[Today at 02:51:57 PM]


Other Games 2025-26 by Clampy
[Today at 02:36:54 PM]


Everton (A) by Crown Hill
[Today at 01:57:50 PM]


Season Ticket 2025/26 by cdbearsfan
[Today at 01:42:16 PM]

Recent Posts

Follow us on...

Author Topic: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread  (Read 717840 times)

Offline Fernando Partridge

  • Member
  • Posts: 491
Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
« Reply #2160 on: January 10, 2012, 09:16:15 PM »
Fellow villains does any one know how many loan signings we can make?
And do we have 1 or 2 players on loan- Jenas loan cancelled due to injury or we continue to pay so listed as loan?
Answers below pls

Offline Mazrim

  • Member
  • Posts: 21173
  • Location: Hall Green.
Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
« Reply #2161 on: January 10, 2012, 10:23:22 PM »
So when would you look to move him on then, Maz?

If he's not doing enough to force his way into the side for the run he needs, then do you drop a better (at the moment at least) player to give him a go or keep giving him new contracts until he does get the chance?

When he's had a chance and failed which I would argue is yet to happen. But if we're never going to give him that chance then it may as well be asap.
But then I would say give him the chance. Not instead of Gabby or Bent but instead of Heskey. Which will probably be when Keane has gone back now.

Online paul_e

  • Member
  • Posts: 37266
  • Age: 45
  • GM : July, 2013
Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
« Reply #2162 on: January 10, 2012, 11:36:51 PM »
So when would you look to move him on then, Maz?

If he's not doing enough to force his way into the side for the run he needs, then do you drop a better (at the moment at least) player to give him a go or keep giving him new contracts until he does get the chance?

When he's had a chance and failed which I would argue is yet to happen. But if we're never going to give him that chance then it may as well be asap.
But then I would say give him the chance. Not instead of Gabby or Bent but instead of Heskey. Which will probably be when Keane has gone back now.

I think the important thing is a chance to make it doesn't mean 7-8 starts in a row, it means coming off the bench with 30minutes to go regularly rather than in the last 10 minutes for 1 game in 4/5.  At the moment the pressure is all that if he doesn't do something exceptional in that cameo he has more people saying he's never going to make it.

Online villadelph

  • Member
  • Posts: 6064
  • | UTV | 215 |
  • GM : 20.05.2025
Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
« Reply #2163 on: January 11, 2012, 12:02:27 AM »
8mil for Aly Cissokho?! Yes, please.

Offline Mazrim

  • Member
  • Posts: 21173
  • Location: Hall Green.
Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
« Reply #2164 on: January 11, 2012, 12:08:59 AM »
8mil for Aly Cissokho?! Yes, please.

Eh?

Offline old man villa fan

  • Member
  • Posts: 3458
  • Location: Birmingham
Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
« Reply #2165 on: January 11, 2012, 07:21:18 AM »
So when would you look to move him on then, Maz?

If he's not doing enough to force his way into the side for the run he needs, then do you drop a better (at the moment at least) player to give him a go or keep giving him new contracts until he does get the chance?

When he's had a chance and failed which I would argue is yet to happen. But if we're never going to give him that chance then it may as well be asap.
But then I would say give him the chance. Not instead of Gabby or Bent but instead of Heskey. Which will probably be when Keane has gone back now.

I think the important thing is a chance to make it doesn't mean 7-8 starts in a row, it means coming off the bench with 30minutes to go regularly rather than in the last 10 minutes for 1 game in 4/5.  At the moment the pressure is all that if he doesn't do something exceptional in that cameo he has more people saying he's never going to make it.

Your point about being introduced as substitute more frequently and for longer periods is the key to seeing whether he can make it at this level with Villa.  I believe he can.

McLeish is very much like O'Neill in that he uses substitutes only when necessary and very rarely to change tactics/formation.  So with Delfouneso not being the same type of player as either Bent or Agbonlahor, McLeish sees it difficult to take one off and bring on Delfouneso as it means he has to change is tactics for Nathan to play his natural game or the player has to play a role that is not his natural game.  That is one of my main gripes with McLeish in that he is too rigid and negative.  The cup match against Bristol Rovers was an ideal match to give Delfouneso some more match experience but no, he goes back to tried and tested (and crap) Heskey.

Online ozzjim

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • Posts: 31056
  • Location: Here.
  • GM : 30.08.2022
Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
« Reply #2166 on: January 11, 2012, 07:36:55 AM »
Quite why Aly Cissoko has appeared on our transfer thread is beyond me, but there is more chance of signing Ridgewell.

Offline taylorsworkrate

  • Member
  • Posts: 7944
  • Location: Summer Lovin Torture Party
Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
« Reply #2167 on: January 11, 2012, 08:03:26 AM »
8mil for Aly Cissokho?! Yes, please.

I think we can put the bullshit / bollocks part of the the thread title back now.

Offline PaulTheVillan

  • Member
  • Posts: 23881
  • GM : 16.08.2022
Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
« Reply #2168 on: January 11, 2012, 09:14:42 AM »
Guys, you're forgetting that Keane is only with us for 6 games so there still is a chance for the Fonz to get a look in after he has gone.
I really doubt Fonz would have been that involved in those 6 games anyway

Offline JUAN PABLO

  • Member
  • Posts: 34345
  • Location: hinckley
    • http://www.scifimafia.net
  • GM : Aug, 2014
Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
« Reply #2169 on: January 11, 2012, 09:34:29 AM »
So when would you look to move him on then, Maz?

If he's not doing enough to force his way into the side for the run he needs, then do you drop a better (at the moment at least) player to give him a go or keep giving him new contracts until he does get the chance?

When he's had a chance and failed which I would argue is yet to happen. But if we're never going to give him that chance then it may as well be asap.
But then I would say give him the chance. Not instead of Gabby or Bent but instead of Heskey. Which will probably be when Keane has gone back now.

I think the important thing is a chance to make it doesn't mean 7-8 starts in a row, it means coming off the bench with 30minutes to go regularly rather than in the last 10 minutes for 1 game in 4/5.  At the moment the pressure is all that if he doesn't do something exceptional in that cameo he has more people saying he's never going to make it.

  That is one of my main gripes with McLeish in that he is too rigid and negative.  The cup match against Bristol Rovers was an ideal match to give Delfouneso some more match experience but no, he goes back to tried and tested (and crap) Heskey.


spot on , what was the point of bringing injury prone Heskey on a pitch like that when you are 3-0 up , now the tumbler is out injured for a month , good for us but AMC will be gutted .

Offline Concrete John

  • Member
  • Posts: 15175
  • Location: Flying blind on a rocket cycle
  • GM : Mar, 2014
Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
« Reply #2170 on: January 11, 2012, 09:46:18 AM »
So when would you look to move him on then, Maz?

If he's not doing enough to force his way into the side for the run he needs, then do you drop a better (at the moment at least) player to give him a go or keep giving him new contracts until he does get the chance?

When he's had a chance and failed which I would argue is yet to happen. But if we're never going to give him that chance then it may as well be asap.
But then I would say give him the chance. Not instead of Gabby or Bent but instead of Heskey. Which will probably be when Keane has gone back now.

I think the important thing is a chance to make it doesn't mean 7-8 starts in a row, it means coming off the bench with 30minutes to go regularly rather than in the last 10 minutes for 1 game in 4/5.  At the moment the pressure is all that if he doesn't do something exceptional in that cameo he has more people saying he's never going to make it.

Your point about being introduced as substitute more frequently and for longer periods is the key to seeing whether he can make it at this level with Villa.  I believe he can.

McLeish is very much like O'Neill in that he uses substitutes only when necessary and very rarely to change tactics/formation.  So with Delfouneso not being the same type of player as either Bent or Agbonlahor, McLeish sees it difficult to take one off and bring on Delfouneso as it means he has to change is tactics for Nathan to play his natural game or the player has to play a role that is not his natural game.  That is one of my main gripes with McLeish in that he is too rigid and negative.  The cup match against Bristol Rovers was an ideal match to give Delfouneso some more match experience but no, he goes back to tried and tested (and crap) Heskey.

I think that in order to get a run what the Fonz needs is to do more in the cameo's he has.  Not necessarily score everytime, but do something to give the manager a decision to make for the next game.  What then happens is he gets gradually brought into things more, even if it might take an injury to get him a small run of starts, until he's the first team regular the next generation are then trying to dislodge him. 

Unfortunately, that's what hasn't happened (although I agree in games like Bristol he should be used ahead of Heskey) so he's sort of in limbo right now.

As I've said before, I think the best thing for the player himself is to move on to kickstart his career. 

Offline Vanilla

  • Member
  • Posts: 697
  • Location: I live in the B6.
Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
« Reply #2171 on: January 11, 2012, 01:29:19 PM »
Fellow villains does any one know how many loan signings we can make?
And do we have 1 or 2 players on loan- Jenas loan cancelled due to injury or we continue to pay so listed as loan?
Answers below pls

As Jenas is signed for the whole season, as nobody put an injury clause in the agreement with Spurs, we are allowed one more for this season.

toplad4u

  • Guest
Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
« Reply #2172 on: January 11, 2012, 02:00:11 PM »

8mil for Aly Cissokho?! Yes, please.

I'm sure if Houllier was in charge we would of signed him in the summer..... rumours a deal was struck also for Ba and Cabaye

Offline Rick_avfc

  • Member
  • Posts: 1258
  • Location: Birmingham
Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
« Reply #2173 on: January 11, 2012, 02:24:06 PM »

8mil for Aly Cissokho?! Yes, please.

I'm sure if Houllier was in charge we would of signed him in the summer..... rumours a deal was struck also for Ba and Cabaye

Please dont say things like this as it gets me depressed thinking that we could have had Ba and Cabaye but ended up with Hutton and Jenas :-(

Online Chris Smith

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 36449
  • Location: At home
  • GM : 20.07.2026
Re: January Transfer Speculation (or lack of) Thread
« Reply #2174 on: January 11, 2012, 03:03:52 PM »

8mil for Aly Cissokho?! Yes, please.

I'm sure if Houllier was in charge we would of signed him in the summer..... rumours a deal was struck also for Ba and Cabaye

Other than the having any money and needing to balance the wage bill I can't think of any reason why that wouldn't have happened.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal