Honestly, if they went back to one way systems after games the traffic would dissipate quickly. Provide buses in from New Street too.
Quote from: Lastfootstamper on December 07, 2021, 12:57:09 PMSo, "no" to cannons, then?Better idea. There's medievil tunnels leading to Aston Hall from the direction of Bevington road. Widen them a bit to take a narrow gauge rail train (like the stuff you see at theme parks) and then extend them to the wasteland behind the mosque on Park circus roundabout. Direct all the busses there and then people come out in Aston Hall after a quick trip underground.
So, "no" to cannons, then?
Quote from: LeeB on December 07, 2021, 01:33:04 PMQuote from: chrisw1 on December 07, 2021, 01:27:37 PMI don't see the problem with the multi storey suggestion. If one of the limiting factors to a North stand redevelopment is limited car parking (as DW suggested it is) then a 1 or 2 deck multi storey seems to be a perfectly reasonable solution to me. How would it be any worse than underground parking?Yes getting out will be a pain, but I'm thiking one or two decks to replace lost parking and slightly increase what we already have, not a 7 storey monstrocity. It wouldn't really be much worse than getting out of a surface car park (particularly if filter lanes were adopted to stip one exit route having priority whilst another is completely blocked). Also, as many of the visitors are likley to be corporate guests, hopefull they leaving times will be a bit staggered anyway.I appreciate people like to take the piss out of Fred, but game pricing and the multi-storey suggestion are perfectly valid comments to make. I once parked in Londonderry House in Dale End to go to a gig at the Academy, you're talking 2,000 people. It was horrific trying to get out. Imagine enduring that only to be stuck on the local roads behind everyone else.There's only one solution, and it's a zero tolerance curfew at least two hours either side of the match for anyone without a valid match ticket, with a 15-20 mile radius.Yep, multi-story car parks are intended to be used where there's regular comings and goings like shopping centres, not where you've got hundreds of people arriving and leaving at the same time. It would just make a bad situation even worse.
Quote from: chrisw1 on December 07, 2021, 01:27:37 PMI don't see the problem with the multi storey suggestion. If one of the limiting factors to a North stand redevelopment is limited car parking (as DW suggested it is) then a 1 or 2 deck multi storey seems to be a perfectly reasonable solution to me. How would it be any worse than underground parking?Yes getting out will be a pain, but I'm thiking one or two decks to replace lost parking and slightly increase what we already have, not a 7 storey monstrocity. It wouldn't really be much worse than getting out of a surface car park (particularly if filter lanes were adopted to stip one exit route having priority whilst another is completely blocked). Also, as many of the visitors are likley to be corporate guests, hopefull they leaving times will be a bit staggered anyway.I appreciate people like to take the piss out of Fred, but game pricing and the multi-storey suggestion are perfectly valid comments to make. I once parked in Londonderry House in Dale End to go to a gig at the Academy, you're talking 2,000 people. It was horrific trying to get out. Imagine enduring that only to be stuck on the local roads behind everyone else.There's only one solution, and it's a zero tolerance curfew at least two hours either side of the match for anyone without a valid match ticket, with a 15-20 mile radius.
I don't see the problem with the multi storey suggestion. If one of the limiting factors to a North stand redevelopment is limited car parking (as DW suggested it is) then a 1 or 2 deck multi storey seems to be a perfectly reasonable solution to me. How would it be any worse than underground parking?Yes getting out will be a pain, but I'm thiking one or two decks to replace lost parking and slightly increase what we already have, not a 7 storey monstrocity. It wouldn't really be much worse than getting out of a surface car park (particularly if filter lanes were adopted to stip one exit route having priority whilst another is completely blocked). Also, as many of the visitors are likley to be corporate guests, hopefull they leaving times will be a bit staggered anyway.I appreciate people like to take the piss out of Fred, but game pricing and the multi-storey suggestion are perfectly valid comments to make.
Quote from: sickbeggar on December 07, 2021, 02:00:15 PMQuote from: Lastfootstamper on December 07, 2021, 12:57:09 PMSo, "no" to cannons, then?Better idea. There's medievil tunnels leading to Aston Hall from the direction of Bevington road. Widen them a bit to take a narrow gauge rail train (like the stuff you see at theme parks) and then extend them to the wasteland behind the mosque on Park circus roundabout. Direct all the busses there and then people come out in Aston Hall after a quick trip underground.Merge the ideas - flood the underground tunnels, then use them to form part of the proposal canal/hovercraft extension.
Quote from: john e on December 06, 2021, 07:32:31 PMHe’s got a point about pricingHe would if we hadn't essentially sold both those games out.Like it or not, the club will charge what people are willing to pay, and a near-as-dammit sell out suggests people are willing to pay a lot.
He’s got a point about pricing
Quote from: dave.woodhall on December 07, 2021, 12:35:33 PMQuote from: gpbarr on December 07, 2021, 12:31:40 PMRealistically if they are actually serious about increasing capacity, they will likely (and sadly) have to look away from Villa Park. The transport inflexibility is a huge problem that won’t be solved by hair brained ideas like cable cars. It’s a beautiful shrine to football in the middle of a housing estate with as bad transport links as any in the professional game.Everton had the same problem - as did Arsenal. Something will have to give in the end. I'm starting to think that's the only alternative. I doubt Messrs McGregor and Ramsay would have let sentiment stand in the way of progress. I agree Dave.If we take Everton as an example, they were told that due to lack of availability of land, they'd have to build it out of town and so were looking at a site in Kirkby, on the other side of the M57 about 6 miles out of the city centre. After a lot of opposition from fans, they did a deal and are now moving to the new site on the docks, a mile or two out of the city centre. They've got the area's World Heritage status to deal with as well.It's difficult to see how you can get round a lot of Villa Park's inherent problems. It's always going to have a row of houses on one side, and a Grade I listed historic house and its park on the other. It's always going to be surrounded by streets that are too narrow for the volume of cars, and there's never going to be enough pubs/restaurants around to dilute people arriving and leaving en masse.
Quote from: gpbarr on December 07, 2021, 12:31:40 PMRealistically if they are actually serious about increasing capacity, they will likely (and sadly) have to look away from Villa Park. The transport inflexibility is a huge problem that won’t be solved by hair brained ideas like cable cars. It’s a beautiful shrine to football in the middle of a housing estate with as bad transport links as any in the professional game.Everton had the same problem - as did Arsenal. Something will have to give in the end. I'm starting to think that's the only alternative. I doubt Messrs McGregor and Ramsay would have let sentiment stand in the way of progress.
Realistically if they are actually serious about increasing capacity, they will likely (and sadly) have to look away from Villa Park. The transport inflexibility is a huge problem that won’t be solved by hair brained ideas like cable cars. It’s a beautiful shrine to football in the middle of a housing estate with as bad transport links as any in the professional game.Everton had the same problem - as did Arsenal. Something will have to give in the end.
Quote from: Risso on December 07, 2021, 12:53:49 PMQuote from: dave.woodhall on December 07, 2021, 12:35:33 PMQuote from: gpbarr on December 07, 2021, 12:31:40 PMRealistically if they are actually serious about increasing capacity, they will likely (and sadly) have to look away from Villa Park. The transport inflexibility is a huge problem that won’t be solved by hair brained ideas like cable cars. It’s a beautiful shrine to football in the middle of a housing estate with as bad transport links as any in the professional game.Everton had the same problem - as did Arsenal. Something will have to give in the end. I'm starting to think that's the only alternative. I doubt Messrs McGregor and Ramsay would have let sentiment stand in the way of progress. I agree Dave.If we take Everton as an example, they were told that due to lack of availability of land, they'd have to build it out of town and so were looking at a site in Kirkby, on the other side of the M57 about 6 miles out of the city centre. After a lot of opposition from fans, they did a deal and are now moving to the new site on the docks, a mile or two out of the city centre. They've got the area's World Heritage status to deal with as well.It's difficult to see how you can get round a lot of Villa Park's inherent problems. It's always going to have a row of houses on one side, and a Grade I listed historic house and its park on the other. It's always going to be surrounded by streets that are too narrow for the volume of cars, and there's never going to be enough pubs/restaurants around to dilute people arriving and leaving en masse.The worst thing is, if you account for the village and stumps the site has easily enough area, it's just an impossible shape. The more I look the better an idea I think it is to look at the gas towers site, it's a perfect size and shape (if you take up the industiral sites nearby as well), it's got a station that's about the same distance as aston is from the current ground, there's very good road networks to there, it's a reasonable distance to walk from the city centre and I think you could quite easily convince the council to extend a tram line to there as part of the link to HS2.
Quote from: paul_e on December 07, 2021, 03:19:13 PMQuote from: Risso on December 07, 2021, 12:53:49 PMQuote from: dave.woodhall on December 07, 2021, 12:35:33 PMQuote from: gpbarr on December 07, 2021, 12:31:40 PMRealistically if they are actually serious about increasing capacity, they will likely (and sadly) have to look away from Villa Park. The transport inflexibility is a huge problem that won’t be solved by hair brained ideas like cable cars. It’s a beautiful shrine to football in the middle of a housing estate with as bad transport links as any in the professional game.Everton had the same problem - as did Arsenal. Something will have to give in the end. I'm starting to think that's the only alternative. I doubt Messrs McGregor and Ramsay would have let sentiment stand in the way of progress. I agree Dave.If we take Everton as an example, they were told that due to lack of availability of land, they'd have to build it out of town and so were looking at a site in Kirkby, on the other side of the M57 about 6 miles out of the city centre. After a lot of opposition from fans, they did a deal and are now moving to the new site on the docks, a mile or two out of the city centre. They've got the area's World Heritage status to deal with as well.It's difficult to see how you can get round a lot of Villa Park's inherent problems. It's always going to have a row of houses on one side, and a Grade I listed historic house and its park on the other. It's always going to be surrounded by streets that are too narrow for the volume of cars, and there's never going to be enough pubs/restaurants around to dilute people arriving and leaving en masse.The worst thing is, if you account for the village and stumps the site has easily enough area, it's just an impossible shape. The more I look the better an idea I think it is to look at the gas towers site, it's a perfect size and shape (if you take up the industiral sites nearby as well), it's got a station that's about the same distance as aston is from the current ground, there's very good road networks to there, it's a reasonable distance to walk from the city centre and I think you could quite easily convince the council to extend a tram line to there as part of the link to HS2.Didn't someone say it's been sold for housing?