Whether you like the badge or not, and everybody who I've spoken to absolutely loathes the new one, the point is there's a process that clubs are supposed to follow when changing heritage assets, and the club (or Heck to be more precise) very much haven't done that. At least under Purslow they pretended to have a consultation even if it was intended to influence the final outcome. Now they've just abandoned that badge, taken the already shit Lerner badge and made it worse, and said "here's what you're getting, suck it up."
Quote from: Drummond on May 12, 2024, 12:34:55 PMPut the name at the top and it wouldn’t be so bad. I’d also get rid of 1874 (especially in white), and the small-time star, but I get that there’s plenty of idiots about who like it.
Can someone explain why the star is on our badge is ‘so shit’ ?I can’t for the life of me understand why so many are offended by it.
It's white. It looks like those stars you got in your exercise book at primary school. It seems to be randomly positioned on the badge, and resembles a faint splash of seagull shit. It is supposed to remind us of something we won forty-two years ago, in another century but we have to explain that to most people who see the kit (well I do, people over here don't know where or what Birmingham is to be honest). I dunno really.