Quote from: Stu on January 09, 2024, 11:38:16 AMTalking of costs, the Newcastle ticket prices are mental. £48 cheapest adult, £80 in the Trinity posh seats. £96 for an adult and child on the Holte. Fucking outrageous.
Talking of costs, the Newcastle ticket prices are mental. £48 cheapest adult, £80 in the Trinity posh seats.
If my ST goes up as expected next season I'll be bailing out. £70 per match is beyond my threshold.
Why aren't we doing anything for a decade?
Quote from: Ads on January 09, 2024, 12:09:15 PMQuote from: Risso on January 09, 2024, 11:53:29 AMQuote from: Ads on January 09, 2024, 11:30:13 AMIt does come down to cost. Don't spend £100m to be left in a situation where the reault is unlikely to bring you any closer to bridging a gap between your rivals. So spend £100m for 10,000 extra seats, or spend £1 billion for 20,000?Spurs match day income is around £60m a season more now than it was at their old ground. Yeah, it's not the seat numbers that's the problem, as has been extensively discussed previously.
Quote from: Risso on January 09, 2024, 11:53:29 AMQuote from: Ads on January 09, 2024, 11:30:13 AMIt does come down to cost. Don't spend £100m to be left in a situation where the reault is unlikely to bring you any closer to bridging a gap between your rivals. So spend £100m for 10,000 extra seats, or spend £1 billion for 20,000?Spurs match day income is around £60m a season more now than it was at their old ground.
Quote from: Ads on January 09, 2024, 11:30:13 AMIt does come down to cost. Don't spend £100m to be left in a situation where the reault is unlikely to bring you any closer to bridging a gap between your rivals. So spend £100m for 10,000 extra seats, or spend £1 billion for 20,000?
It does come down to cost. Don't spend £100m to be left in a situation where the reault is unlikely to bring you any closer to bridging a gap between your rivals.
Ask fans of other clubs which grounds they like the best and Villa Park is always in the mix as a favourite, regardless of the shit service etc.
Quote from: Drummond on January 09, 2024, 12:11:45 PMAsk fans of other clubs which grounds they like the best and Villa Park is always in the mix as a favourite, regardless of the shit service etc.They don't have to put up with the shit service for 19 games a year. I quite like Everton as an old historic ground, but it's a terrible experience actually going there. It's like driving a classic car. You can admire the polished walnut dash but the lack of aircon and satnav is going to piss you off if you drove it every day.
Quote from: LeeB on January 09, 2024, 12:11:28 PMQuote from: Ads on January 09, 2024, 12:09:15 PMQuote from: Risso on January 09, 2024, 11:53:29 AMQuote from: Ads on January 09, 2024, 11:30:13 AMIt does come down to cost. Don't spend £100m to be left in a situation where the reault is unlikely to bring you any closer to bridging a gap between your rivals. So spend £100m for 10,000 extra seats, or spend £1 billion for 20,000?Spurs match day income is around £60m a season more now than it was at their old ground. Yeah, it's not the seat numbers that's the problem, as has been extensively discussed previously.Indeed, as the gentleman well knows too.We spend £100m on the North. Great, Villa Park has 25% of what Everton, West Ham, Spurs have, before we get onto actual heavy hitters like Man City, Arsenal etc.Flatten next door, rebuild the lot. There's nothing left of Villa Park from 80 years ago. The best stand isn't even as old as my brother and he's not 30 till September.
Quote from: Ads on January 09, 2024, 12:09:15 PMQuote from: Risso on January 09, 2024, 11:53:29 AMQuote from: Ads on January 09, 2024, 11:30:13 AMIt does come down to cost. Don't spend £100m to be left in a situation where the reault is unlikely to bring you any closer to bridging a gap between your rivals. So spend £100m for 10,000 extra seats, or spend £1 billion for 20,000?Spurs match day income is around £60m a season more now than it was at their old ground.We aren't Spurs and we aren't London. My gut tells me one or two stands like that, for the moment, would suffice and rethink later.
Quote from: Risso on January 09, 2024, 12:19:05 PMQuote from: Drummond on January 09, 2024, 12:11:45 PMAsk fans of other clubs which grounds they like the best and Villa Park is always in the mix as a favourite, regardless of the shit service etc.They don't have to put up with the shit service for 19 games a year. I quite like Everton as an old historic ground, but it's a terrible experience actually going there. It's like driving a classic car. You can admire the polished walnut dash but the lack of aircon and satnav is going to piss you off if you drove it every day.Yet will fill* the ground every match, regardless. The club are on to a winner, or at least should be if they actually pulled their fingers out with the service etc.*apart from 200 odd seats TV and LG etc.
Liverpool have managed to expand Anfield to more or less the same size as Spurs' ground at about a third of the outlay, and Villa Park has a lot more in common with Anfield than it ever did with WHL. Extending the North Stand, and then rebuilding Witton Lane should it ever become feasible has to be more cost effective than planning to fully rebuild on the same site - 2 stands built along similar lines to the ones that have gone up at Anfield could get Villa Park up to 65k and would give us more than enough corporate and GA+ options.The economics of a new build will not stack up unless it is based in town, with the aim at maximising the number of concerts that are held there. Putting the kibosh on the North Stand means we are going to be stuck in a 42k stadium for the foreseeable future.