I much prefer the 2nd design. It looks far more imposing and means VP retains it's Ground heritage as opposed to looking like a scaled down version of an Independence Day space craft that is the new norm. The overhang of the roof looks really good on the Witton Lane side, does it's roof job but looks architecturally pleasing as it fills an open space without compromising the DE stand. It's something different.
Quote from: Risso on July 20, 2023, 12:58:27 PMIt's still a massive car park that goes virtually all the way up to the stand. Nothing like the vision that was sold originally.What tosh.
It's still a massive car park that goes virtually all the way up to the stand. Nothing like the vision that was sold originally.
I thought they were dust clouds from the locals doing 'donuts' in Aston Park.
Quote from: Risso on July 20, 2023, 12:58:27 PMIt's still a massive car park that goes virtually all the way up to the stand. Nothing like the vision that was sold originally.I don't think the quantum of parking will be substantively different to the previous version. The Academy building obviously sits in a different position to the proposed Villa Live building. That means that the parking has been redistributed and the basketball courts re-positioned. I'm fairly sure that the width of the pedestrian route along the rear of the new stand will be the same in both the previous and current schemes. Yes, this route is bounded by parking, but that is because it can't be pushed behind the Villa Live building. In the aerial view that you've posted, the pedestrian route is hidden behind the overhanging roof due to the perspective.
Why do we need basketball courts? Is this for Wes Edens' downtime on his one trip a year to B6 when he wants to shoot some hoops after a board meeting?
That would be years away. It’s another example why not to take the renders too seriously. They’re not planning documents. The original one had a flower stand at the north / Trinity corner, for example.