collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Standard of Refereeing by cdbearsfan
[Today at 12:58:29 AM]


Ollie Watkins by Rory
[Today at 12:47:02 AM]


GUESS THE CROWD R13: ASTON VILLA v Notts Forest, Saturday 3rd January 2026! by Walmley_Villa
[Today at 12:40:51 AM]


Arsenal v Aston Villa Post-Match Thread by Villafirst
[Today at 12:40:23 AM]


Damian Vidagany - Director of Football by Tuscans
[December 31, 2025, 11:35:25 PM]


Emi Martinez by Mortimer's Bear
[December 31, 2025, 11:08:47 PM]


Unai Emery by PeterWithesShin
[December 31, 2025, 11:08:30 PM]


Jadon Sancho (loan) by Percy McCarthy
[December 31, 2025, 10:52:43 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Ollie Watkins  (Read 1062838 times)

Offline ChicagoLion

  • Member
  • Posts: 27293
  • Location: Chicago
  • Literally
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #10230 on: December 31, 2025, 11:54:36 AM »
Literally he did not lose us the game literally but literally could have won it literally.

Offline Villan82

  • Member
  • Posts: 4379
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #10231 on: December 31, 2025, 11:55:29 AM »
I got to witness a striker score 80 league goals for us in 5 and a half seasons and yet he gets slated regularly.

Offline Smirker

  • Member
  • Posts: 7923
  • Location: Birmingham
  • GM : Sep, 2014
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #10232 on: December 31, 2025, 12:07:04 PM »
I know xG is hated by some on here but the chance that he had early on was 0.34 so about 1 in 3. That's a good chance but not a 'he had to score and by missing he's responsible for us losing the game' one.

That said if he was more confident with his left foot I think it was easier on that side but if we're going to criticise players for having a weaker foot he's nowhere near the top of the list for that.

Literally nobody has said he's responsible for us losing.

I did!

We'll It's all your fault then. Stop being so negative Monty.

Offline Monty

  • Member
  • Posts: 29875
  • Location: pastaland
  • GM : 25.05.2024
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #10233 on: December 31, 2025, 12:20:39 PM »
I know xG is hated by some on here but the chance that he had early on was 0.34 so about 1 in 3. That's a good chance but not a 'he had to score and by missing he's responsible for us losing the game' one.

That said if he was more confident with his left foot I think it was easier on that side but if we're going to criticise players for having a weaker foot he's nowhere near the top of the list for that.

Literally nobody has said he's responsible for us losing.

I did!

We'll It's all your fault then. Stop being so negative Monty.

And just what am I meant to do with 4,000 'Emery Out' t-shirts, then?

Offline Smirker

  • Member
  • Posts: 7923
  • Location: Birmingham
  • GM : Sep, 2014
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #10234 on: December 31, 2025, 12:23:07 PM »
Burn one every time Watkins misses a sitter  8)

Offline PeterWithesShin

  • Member
  • Posts: 79271
  • GM : 17.03.2015
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #10235 on: December 31, 2025, 12:39:19 PM »
Quote
Villa's Ollie Watkins has scored a Premier League goal on his birthday in consecutive years, netting against Brighton in 2024. He's the third player to score on more than one birthday in the competition after Teddy Sheringham (1994, 1995) and Tomás Soucek (2022, 2025).

Offline Rudy Can't Fail

  • Member
  • Posts: 42006
  • Location: In the Shade
    • http://www.heroespredictions.co.uk/pl/
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #10236 on: December 31, 2025, 07:09:28 PM »
Literally he did not lose us the game literally but literally could have won it literally.

True. Apart from missing two sitters and getting an assist for Arsenal's second, he was okay. Came close with the header hitting the post and the was there for the tap in after Malen went all Messi for a few seconds. He wasn't alone in having a mixed game, Emi and Sanchos the obvious pair.

I guess he's always been a mixed bag, scores a great goal one minute, the next he looks like he's trying to control a rugby ball. He does have that wonderful knack of scoring though. The problem or mystery is you never quite know which chance he will bury or fluff.

Or put more bluntly, Monty is right. Watkins is a true hero and villain.

Offline Somniloquism

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 35562
  • Location: Back in Brum
  • GM : 06.12.2026
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #10237 on: December 31, 2025, 07:13:27 PM »
Literally he did not lose us the game literally but literally could have won it literally.

True. Apart from missing two sitters and getting an assist for Arsenal's second, he was okay.

Not sure how he managed to do that when he was 30 yards up the pitch from where the ball was lost. And SJM showed how hard it is to score a tap-in when a previous player has done all the hard work.

Offline Rudy Can't Fail

  • Member
  • Posts: 42006
  • Location: In the Shade
    • http://www.heroespredictions.co.uk/pl/
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #10238 on: December 31, 2025, 07:20:39 PM »
Literally he did not lose us the game literally but literally could have won it literally.

True. Apart from missing two sitters and getting an assist for Arsenal's second, he was okay.

Not sure how he managed to do that when he was 30 yards up the pitch from where the ball was lost. And SJM showed how hard it is to score a tap-in when a previous player has done all the hard work.

He set the move up allowing the ball to bounce off him 10 yards.

SJM should be shot for the miss but he aimed it straight at the keeper (sound familiar) whereas Watkins had a 10cm tap in to an empty net, keeper already beaten.

Offline Ian.

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 16492
  • Location: Back home in the Shire
  • GM : 09.01.2026
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #10239 on: December 31, 2025, 07:33:02 PM »
The way we played second half those two missed chances
would have been a consolation, not that I’m defending him, but we were so bad and totally unrecognisable.

When we beat them at home, with a full squad when they rallied for a short time after the break we managed to take control. Having no Kamara, Onana, Torres and Cash was too much.

I reckon if we had Guessand available he’d have been at right back and done far better than Garcia and we would have had another option as soon as Onana wasn’t able to come back out.

Offline Rudy Can't Fail

  • Member
  • Posts: 42006
  • Location: In the Shade
    • http://www.heroespredictions.co.uk/pl/
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #10240 on: December 31, 2025, 07:39:16 PM »
Agree Ian. We had our big chances in the first half and fluffed our lines. So annoying even today.

Offline Ian.

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 16492
  • Location: Back home in the Shire
  • GM : 09.01.2026
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #10241 on: December 31, 2025, 07:43:19 PM »
Yep, it’s gutting to have to go there last night and lose the way we did after our amazing run. When you saw them celebrating at the end though, we know we’ve rattled them, so we just have to get back to our game and keep on their heels.

There’s no shame in the result in the circumstances, but still it’s annoying.

Offline LeeS

  • Member
  • Posts: 4664
  • Location: Beckenham
  • GM : 12.01.2025
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #10242 on: December 31, 2025, 10:24:33 PM »
Please tell me no one on here thinks we are having both the McGinn chance and the Ollie goal? Please.
If the first goes in the second simply doesn’t happen. Even if you play the game a billion times over.

Offline Ian.

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 16492
  • Location: Back home in the Shire
  • GM : 09.01.2026
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #10243 on: December 31, 2025, 10:27:10 PM »
Eh? Why not? They were 5 minutes apart?

Offline cdbearsfan

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 75869
  • Location: Yardley Massive
  • I still hate Bono.
  • GM : 03.02.2026
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #10244 on: December 31, 2025, 10:30:46 PM »
I've never seen a badger in the garden. Lots of foxes, even the occasional hedgehog. But never a badger.

Make of that what you will.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal