Quote from: levico on August 29, 2010, 08:00:40 PMThey've created a deliberate and classic Catch 22 situation.Didn't want to sign any players before the new manager is appointed - candidates won't even be interviewed before Wednesday then Oh Look!! we've missed the deadline. Never mind we'll expect the new manager to make do with no decent midfileder or striker until January - then we'll think of another excuse!!Nonsense. This distrust of the board borders on the paranoia.
They've created a deliberate and classic Catch 22 situation.Didn't want to sign any players before the new manager is appointed - candidates won't even be interviewed before Wednesday then Oh Look!! we've missed the deadline. Never mind we'll expect the new manager to make do with no decent midfileder or striker until January - then we'll think of another excuse!!
Quote from: Ads on August 29, 2010, 08:06:51 PMQuote from: levico on August 29, 2010, 08:00:40 PMThey've created a deliberate and classic Catch 22 situation.Didn't want to sign any players before the new manager is appointed - candidates won't even be interviewed before Wednesday then Oh Look!! we've missed the deadline. Never mind we'll expect the new manager to make do with no decent midfileder or striker until January - then we'll think of another excuse!!Nonsense. This distrust of the board borders on the paranoia.Yeah, very weird. They've done nothing to deserve the distrust either.
"Experience in managing in the Premier League" certainly opens the door to a lot of uninspiring candidates. Southgate? Curbishley?Strange that we set that as the prime criteria.
Quote from: pauliewalnuts on August 29, 2010, 08:34:50 PM"Experience in managing in the Premier League" certainly opens the door to a lot of uninspiring candidates. Southgate? Curbishley?Strange that we set that as the prime criteria.Curbishley is now down at 11-1 from over 50-1 earlier.
Was it houllier who paid £11m for heskey?