Claret Blue and Green
I’m confused now. Are we …?a) Going back to the Purslow plan (don’t think this is the case, but for completeness…)b) Going ahead with the North Stand plans as they were c) Going ahead with the North Stand but doing some alterations that won’t affect the capacity to any meaningful degreed) Option C but it will add to the capacity?The Calvo statement sounded like wouldn’t make any changes, but then the Tanswell article felt like it was saying we were making some bigger changes that’d add a couple of thousand extra seats
Quote from: algy on Today at 07:46:38 AMI’m confused now. Are we …?a) Going back to the Purslow plan (don’t think this is the case, but for completeness…)b) Going ahead with the North Stand plans as they were c) Going ahead with the North Stand but doing some alterations that won’t affect the capacity to any meaningful degreed) Option C but it will add to the capacity?The Calvo statement sounded like wouldn’t make any changes, but then the Tanswell article felt like it was saying we were making some bigger changes that’d add a couple of thousand extra seatsWe need somebody to copy the Athletic article for us cheap uns', but the broad answer is nobody really knows
Diamond KN, thank you. He's published a fresh one a few minutes ago too.
It says they have asked to shut the Trinity Road for 6 months for the development . I dont think that has gone down well with residents
They won’t be changing anything significant as that’d need to reengage the planning process. Interesting though that they’re doing it in totally closed mode for the season though. Didn’t Emery say he didn’t want us playing in front of an empty end in the champions league?