collapse collapse

* - On Sale NOW -

Claret Blue and Green

The story of Aston Villa’s Irish connection

£9.99 plus postage

For ROW Postage please email iotp@heroespublishing.net

Postal Location

Recent Topics

Other Games 2025-26 by The Left Side
[Today at 02:16:03 PM]


Ollie Watkins by Rudy Can't Fail
[Today at 02:06:53 PM]


Nottingham Forest v Aston Villa Pre-Match Thread by Baldy
[Today at 02:03:48 PM]


Fulham v Aston Villa post-match thread by The Edge
[Today at 01:41:37 PM]


Athletics 2026 by Sexual Ealing
[Today at 01:38:21 PM]


Reserves and Academy 2025-26 by Percy McCarthy
[Today at 01:14:26 PM]


Snooker by cdbearsfan
[Today at 01:09:55 PM]


Summer 26 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by LeeB
[Today at 01:07:28 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Villa Park Redevelopment  (Read 1547773 times)

Offline Crown Hill

  • Member
  • Posts: 917
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #10455 on: June 01, 2025, 12:36:12 PM »
Also, could they be moving the tunnel into the corner there in that pic? That would make room for a few more seats as well.

I think the Purslow plan had the tunnel moving?

It did and I suspect it is moving but they have it in the wrong place on the current photo.

As Ads said I think the wheelchair seats are moving elsewhere to make the space for the changes to remove the walkway.

And you can see from the sketches the entrance/exits are being changed as well as up and down steps so it’s deliberate and clearly what is happening!
« Last Edit: June 01, 2025, 12:38:27 PM by Crown Hill »

Offline Ads

  • Member
  • Posts: 44576
  • Location: Playing 5D Chess
  • GM : 17.04.2024
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #10456 on: June 01, 2025, 12:43:03 PM »
Only realistic place for 1200 seats.

Offline Percy McCarthy

  • Member
  • Posts: 37430
  • Location: I'm hiding in my hole
    • King City Online
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #10457 on: June 01, 2025, 02:06:15 PM »

Offline VILLA MOLE

  • Member
  • Posts: 9060
  • Age: 51
  • Location: STRATFORD UPON AVON
  • a v f c

Offline VILLA MOLE

  • Member
  • Posts: 9060
  • Age: 51
  • Location: STRATFORD UPON AVON
  • a v f c
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #10459 on: June 01, 2025, 02:29:02 PM »
Do we know when the building work will start on the North Stand

Offline LeeB

  • Member
  • Posts: 36937
  • Location: Standing in the Klix-O-Gum queue.
  • GM : May, 2014

Offline Dogtanian

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 7584
  • Location: The Streets of Rage ( Tamworth )
  • GM : 06.06.2026
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #10461 on: June 01, 2025, 02:55:30 PM »
Do we know when the building work will start on the North Stand

Planning permission not withstanding, the plan is to start in October I believe.

Offline DB

  • Member
  • Posts: 6005
  • Location: Absolute zero
  • GM : 11.01.2021
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #10462 on: June 01, 2025, 03:00:57 PM »

Offline Percy McCarthy

  • Member
  • Posts: 37430
  • Location: I'm hiding in my hole
    • King City Online
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #10463 on: June 01, 2025, 03:32:16 PM »
How short-sighted it seems, with all the limitations on building backwards to Witton Lane, to have the front rows of the DE so far away from the pitch. Anybody know why?

Offline Crown Hill

  • Member
  • Posts: 917
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #10464 on: June 01, 2025, 03:41:27 PM »
How short-sighted it seems, with all the limitations on building backwards to Witton Lane, to have the front rows of the DE so far away from the pitch. Anybody know why?

The walkway needed to get to the seats isn’t it? Presumably because there was so little room behind? When it was first installed they left the original seats there but the lower tier had ti be rebuilt after asbestos was found!

I suspect these works are for new disabled places. It stops other fans encroaching on the pitch there and frees up the space for development on Trinity side.

Offline Somniloquism

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 37254
  • Location: Back in Brum
  • GM : 06.12.2026
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #10465 on: June 01, 2025, 03:55:59 PM »
How short-sighted it seems, with all the limitations on building backwards to Witton Lane, to have the front rows of the DE so far away from the pitch. Anybody know why?
Bottom was the original stand wasn't it. I thought the only work done at the time was to add the second tier.

Offline Somniloquism

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 37254
  • Location: Back in Brum
  • GM : 06.12.2026
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #10466 on: June 01, 2025, 03:57:09 PM »
How short-sighted it seems, with all the limitations on building backwards to Witton Lane, to have the front rows of the DE so far away from the pitch. Anybody know why?

The walkway needed to get to the seats isn’t it? Presumably because there was so little room behind? When it was first installed they left the original seats there but the lower tier had ti be rebuilt after asbestos was found!

I suspect these works are for new disabled places. It stops other fans encroaching on the pitch there and frees up the space for development on Trinity side.
Looking at the new layout of seats posted in the ST thread, the only new disabled seats are near the Holte.

Offline Percy McCarthy

  • Member
  • Posts: 37430
  • Location: I'm hiding in my hole
    • King City Online
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #10467 on: June 01, 2025, 04:04:03 PM »
How short-sighted it seems, with all the limitations on building backwards to Witton Lane, to have the front rows of the DE so far away from the pitch. Anybody know why?
Bottom was the original stand wasn't it. I thought the only work done at the time was to add the second tier.

Oh yes, I think you’re right.

Offline London Villan

  • Member
  • Posts: 11427
  • Location: Brum
  • GM : 01.10.2025
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #10468 on: June 01, 2025, 05:28:16 PM »
It was pretty much the 1897 layout when it was built in 1994/95, built but Doug’s builders messed it up and the old lower teir had to be removed the season after the stand was opened. The new lower teir then had to adhere to modern standards, which caused the problems with the big gap at the front and blocking sight lines from the Holte.

Online dave.woodhall

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 64481
  • Location: Treading water in a sea of retarded sexuality and bad poetry.
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #10469 on: June 01, 2025, 05:35:26 PM »
Because Ellis did it on the cheap, just for a change. First there was the asbestos problem, then the sightings. Penny wise, pound foolish again.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal