Don't forget, however minor the impact, the media act almost as PR companies for some clubs. One only has to look at the different approach with regards to injuries between clubs like ours and Spurs, the ridiculous "rags to riches" painting of Stockport City's treble last season and the tsunami of bullshit whenever Liverpool play at home. Attracting those "floating" fans is difficult but if someone is bigging you up every five minutes, it definitely helps.
They take £1m in beer sales alone everytime they host the NFL.
Quote from: Ads on January 17, 2024, 01:13:05 PMQuote from: Risso on January 17, 2024, 01:06:12 PMQuote from: Ads on January 17, 2024, 12:50:12 PMIt's still nowhere near £70 per head per game and critically, it's an absolute light year behind Spurs, who can afford another Diaby more than us, every year. New ground please.What do we do in the intervening ten years?Squeeze the juice out folks with fancy watches *winky face*And two boilers.
Quote from: Risso on January 17, 2024, 01:06:12 PMQuote from: Ads on January 17, 2024, 12:50:12 PMIt's still nowhere near £70 per head per game and critically, it's an absolute light year behind Spurs, who can afford another Diaby more than us, every year. New ground please.What do we do in the intervening ten years?Squeeze the juice out folks with fancy watches *winky face*
Quote from: Ads on January 17, 2024, 12:50:12 PMIt's still nowhere near £70 per head per game and critically, it's an absolute light year behind Spurs, who can afford another Diaby more than us, every year. New ground please.What do we do in the intervening ten years?
It's still nowhere near £70 per head per game and critically, it's an absolute light year behind Spurs, who can afford another Diaby more than us, every year. New ground please.
Spurs figures look artificially inflated to me . Must have some good accountants
Deloitte, using one assumes the club's accounts, provide one number, but some really figure plucked from the air calculations by people on the internet say "Nah, reckon it's 5 times as much".I know who I believe. It's almost as bad as when people, who are not engineers with a long history of working on projects like this, assure us it "wouldn't be too difficult" to implement whatever utterly hatstand idea they have for adding seats.
Accountants cooking the books , surely not
Quote from: VillaTim on January 17, 2024, 03:56:39 PMSpurs figures look artificially inflated to me . Must have some good accountants Yes, that infamous brand of very good accountants who make it look like a company has more revenue than it actually does, thereby ensuring they pay more tax?
Quote from: pauliewalnuts on January 17, 2024, 10:25:39 PMQuote from: VillaTim on January 17, 2024, 03:56:39 PMSpurs figures look artificially inflated to me . Must have some good accountants Yes, that infamous brand of very good accountants who make it look like a company has more revenue than it actually does, thereby ensuring they pay more tax?Hey, don't cone around here with your fancy 'thinking'.
Quote from: pauliewalnuts on January 17, 2024, 01:53:40 PMDeloitte, using one assumes the club's accounts, provide one number, but some really figure plucked from the air calculations by people on the internet say "Nah, reckon it's 5 times as much".I know who I believe. It's almost as bad as when people, who are not engineers with a long history of working on projects like this, assure us it "wouldn't be too difficult" to implement whatever utterly hatstand idea they have for adding seats.The history and credibility of audit "partners" like Deloitte might lead you to swing more towards randomers on the internet for your facts. They were the audit partner of the basket case FAI for over 20 years, for example.
As for high turnover relating to a high tax bill, anyone with half a brain will know there's plenty of avenues for avoiding the tax man.