Emi Martinez

[kippaxvilla2]

Is this shit coming from Martinez’ side? It’s all emanating from Argentina.

[Mister E]

Regarding release clauses, Delph agreed to such instrument in order to play the dynamic between current employer and prospective employers. It actually turned out reasonably well for all parties, I suppose (with hindsight).
Just sayin'

[Mellin]

Thought that at the time and still do. Could've easily walked for free. Probably should've.

[JUAN PABLO]

Manchester United reportedly failed with a loan proposal to Aston Villa for goalkeeper Emi Martinez over the weekend.

cheeky f******s

[AV84]

So far they've only got Rashford off their books, I think. And yet they've spent a good bit. I think this will rumble on all summer, but I'd be surprised if they make anything happen without getting rid of Hojlund, Onana, Garnacho, Sancho, Antony and several others first.

[Rudy Can't Fail]

Did it fail bacause we wouldn't loan them Watkins too? Half arsed club.

[Drummond]

If that's true, it suggests we want him out.

[Dante Lavelli]

If that's true, it suggests we want him out.

Or they’re trying to encourage Emi to say something publicly to drive his price down.
No clue but I did think it was a strange move, if true.

[john2710]

If that's true, it suggests we want him out.

If that was the case then we'd have accepted their offer.

[Drummond]

If that's true, it suggests we want him out.

If that was the case then we'd have accepted their offer.

The only way we'd let any top player go is on a permanent deal. Loans are no good. That they even try that suggests we've intimated we're prepared to let him go.

[Rigadon]

I think the club is ok with him going and have already lined the replacement up. 

[Meanwood Villa]

If that's true, it suggests we want him out.

If that was the case then we'd have accepted their offer.

The only way we'd let any top player go is on a permanent deal. Loans are no good. That they even try that suggests we've intimated we're prepared to let him go.

Or they're pisstaking bellends?

[john2710]

It's likely we'd listen to sensible offers, as we would with most players. As an ageing player, probably on the highest salary in the squad, I think he's one we'd look to do business, if it's to our advantage. But not at a point where we'd help one of our rivals on the cheap.

I'm guessing they'll next try a swap deal of Onana for Martinez.

[Bent Neilsens Screamer]

They want to try and shift Onana first but he’s injured isn’t he?
The obvious solution would be a swap with Garnacho as it’s rumoured they’re valued at a similar price, however wouldn’t we still need to potentially sell another big player, or several squad players, to get to the £25m+ to cover the cost of a No1 goalie, the Lille bloke for instance?

[Rory]

If that's true, it suggests we want him out.

If that was the case then we'd have accepted their offer.

The only way we'd let any top player go is on a permanent deal. Loans are no good. That they even try that suggests we've intimated we're prepared to let him go.

Or they're pisstaking bellends?

Yes.