collapse collapse

* - On Sale NOW -

Claret Blue and Green

The story of Aston Villa’s Irish connection

£9.99 plus postage

For ROW Postage please email iotp@heroespublishing.net

Postal Location

Recent Topics

Ex- Villa Players still playing watch by Rory
[Today at 01:45:30 AM]


Fulham v Aston Villa post-match thread by Rory
[Today at 01:33:04 AM]


Loanwatch 2025-26 by dcdavecollett
[Today at 01:26:16 AM]


Ollie Watkins by dcdavecollett
[Today at 01:19:40 AM]


Other Games 2025-26 by Rory
[Today at 01:06:33 AM]


Will we qualify for the CL? by Rory
[April 25, 2026, 11:39:44 PM]


Press-ed off again by Legion
[April 25, 2026, 11:14:57 PM]


Lamare Bogarde by Drummond
[April 25, 2026, 10:57:35 PM]

Recent Posts

Re: Ex- Villa Players still playing watch by Rory
[Today at 01:45:30 AM]


Re: Ex- Villa Players still playing watch by dcdavecollett
[Today at 01:36:53 AM]


Re: Fulham v Aston Villa post-match thread by Rory
[Today at 01:33:04 AM]


Re: Loanwatch 2025-26 by dcdavecollett
[Today at 01:26:16 AM]


Re: Ollie Watkins by dcdavecollett
[Today at 01:19:40 AM]


Re: Ex- Villa Players still playing watch by eamonn
[Today at 01:11:40 AM]


Re: Other Games 2025-26 by Rory
[Today at 01:06:33 AM]


Re: Other Games 2025-26 by Hillbilly
[Today at 12:30:25 AM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Ollie Watkins  (Read 1223463 times)

Offline Monty

  • Member
  • Posts: 30580
  • Location: pastaland
  • GM : 25.05.2024
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #10215 on: December 30, 2025, 11:37:14 PM »
He had a mixed game.

As I said on the match thread, he was very energetic in the first half and looked up for it but showed no quality and that was what cost us going ahead.

It isn't the reason we lost, but it would have changed the game had he scored.

Second half nowhere to be seen but most of them were the same.

This is not controversial in any way.

He showed much quality, but he also had key lapses which may even have cost us the game. Like happens to a goalkeeper too. I suggest we cover that thread like a rash.

Offline brontebilly

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12991
  • GM : 23.06.2026
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #10216 on: December 30, 2025, 11:40:31 PM »
I said he was shit today and he was.

Do you think he was good?

Yes, he wasn't shit anyway. His performance level compared to Gyokeres was night and day stuff. Second half was poor but playing ahead of a beaten midfield. Still a fine header late on. He's getting chances now that he wasn't earlier in the season.

Offline Bent Neilsens Screamer

  • Member
  • Posts: 8654
  • Location: On a dark desert highway.
  • GM : 25.11.2024
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #10217 on: December 30, 2025, 11:46:11 PM »
Glad he's scored tonight and seems to have started to find his scoring boots generally, but my god that chance he missed at nil-nil. Could have made a huge difference.

To not even get it on target was very poor.

Offline SamTheMouse

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12238
  • Location: The Land of the Fragrant Founders of Human Rights, Fine Wines & Bikinis
  • GM : 29.09.2026
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #10218 on: December 30, 2025, 11:57:26 PM »
As usual, he worked and fought hard and showed intelligence to get into great positions, but his poor technique let him down.

I love him, but he's frustrating as fuck sometimes.

As bronte rightly points out though, Gyokeres was utter rubbish again, which just serves to underline the fact that really good target men are like rocking horse shit and we perhaps underappreciate Watkins.

Offline PeterWithesShin

  • Member
  • Posts: 81967
  • GM : 17.03.2015
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #10219 on: December 31, 2025, 12:01:54 AM »
Gyokeres and Jesus cost them well over £100m and I wouldn't swap either for Ollie.

Offline Drummond

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 35432
  • Location: Everywhere, and nowhere.
  • GM : 17.10.2026
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #10220 on: December 31, 2025, 12:40:54 AM »
"All that matters is that he gets goals."

After a poor personal return (as part of the team that wins 16 out of 18) he starts scoring goals. 5 in last 6.

"He didn't do enough." And "but I mean this season" and "but you can't include last season"  or "but you can't include his career" (where the goals comparison stacks up against everyone).

Give it a rest Smirker.

Online Rory

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 10987
  • GM : PCM
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #10221 on: December 31, 2025, 12:49:11 AM »
Does the thread of any other player get bumped after every single game? This is fucking ridiculous.

Offline cdbearsfan

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 78281
  • Location: Yardley Massive
  • I still hate Bono.
  • GM : 03.02.2027
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #10222 on: December 31, 2025, 12:57:07 AM »
Yes

Offline cdbearsfan

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 78281
  • Location: Yardley Massive
  • I still hate Bono.
  • GM : 03.02.2027
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #10223 on: December 31, 2025, 12:57:23 AM »
It

Offline cdbearsfan

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 78281
  • Location: Yardley Massive
  • I still hate Bono.
  • GM : 03.02.2027
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #10224 on: December 31, 2025, 12:57:43 AM »
Is

Offline Smirker

  • Member
  • Posts: 8286
  • Location: Birmingham
  • GM : Sep, 2014
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #10225 on: December 31, 2025, 01:22:46 AM »
"All that matters is that he gets goals."

After a poor personal return (as part of the team that wins 16 out of 18) he starts scoring goals. 5 in last 6.

"He didn't do enough." And "but I mean this season" and "but you can't include last season"  or "but you can't include his career" (where the goals comparison stacks up against everyone).

Give it a rest Smirker.

I didn't criticise his goalscoring today though did I? I said his lack of quality cost us a 1-0 lead.

And it did.

Offline paul_e

  • Member
  • Posts: 39130
  • Age: 46
  • GM : July, 2013
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #10226 on: December 31, 2025, 10:33:37 AM »
I know xG is hated by some on here but the chance that he had early on was 0.34 so about 1 in 3. That's a good chance but not a 'he had to score and by missing he's responsible for us losing the game' one.

That said if he was more confident with his left foot I think it was easier on that side but if we're going to criticise players for having a weaker foot he's nowhere near the top of the list for that.

Offline PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 58360
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #10227 on: December 31, 2025, 11:43:54 AM »
It’s the disproportionate focus on this thread that does my head in. Literally unless he’s faultless, immediately a post on here having a go at his perceived limitations. It’s just so bloody negative.

Offline Smirker

  • Member
  • Posts: 8286
  • Location: Birmingham
  • GM : Sep, 2014
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #10228 on: December 31, 2025, 11:50:27 AM »
I know xG is hated by some on here but the chance that he had early on was 0.34 so about 1 in 3. That's a good chance but not a 'he had to score and by missing he's responsible for us losing the game' one.

That said if he was more confident with his left foot I think it was easier on that side but if we're going to criticise players for having a weaker foot he's nowhere near the top of the list for that.

Literally nobody has said he's responsible for us losing.

Offline Monty

  • Member
  • Posts: 30580
  • Location: pastaland
  • GM : 25.05.2024
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #10229 on: December 31, 2025, 11:52:51 AM »
I know xG is hated by some on here but the chance that he had early on was 0.34 so about 1 in 3. That's a good chance but not a 'he had to score and by missing he's responsible for us losing the game' one.

That said if he was more confident with his left foot I think it was easier on that side but if we're going to criticise players for having a weaker foot he's nowhere near the top of the list for that.

Literally nobody has said he's responsible for us losing.

I did!

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal