It was clearly about Smirker as he mentioned 10 men.
It was, and there’s only one person in the entire history of this forum that doesn’t understand what an assist is and why they matter.
Why are you lying?
If I say "Player 1 has only got 2 goals in 20 games. I think his goalscoring is bad"
And you say "But he's also got 4 assists"
I am going to disregard the assists because I am talking about goals.
That is what this Watkins debacle started as.
You are carrying it on every time you lie and claim I said outright that assists don't matter.
That is being obtuse beyond reason. We debate whether Ollie is a good player or not. You deliberately narrowed that debate to whether he’s a good goal scorer or not, so that you could ignore his contributions to the team beyond goals. Because his contribution to the team, beyond goals, is important for our results, and is a part of how we rate him as a player. Most people think that’s obvious.
Even in the narrow debate about whether he’s a decent/good goal scorer or not, you underplay his goal scoring. That’s fine, you’re entitled to your opinion on his goal scoring.
He’s been shit this year, not many people have argued otherwise. Many people, however, try and provide some counterpoints and try to bring up some of the (albeit very few) good things he’s done this year. That’s a natural reaction to the constant shit posting, and brings a welcome balance to counter your vendetta. There’d be far fewer people clutching at those straws of positivity if it weren’t for your manner of posting on this topic, which is ironic given how you’ve often tried to bring positivity to this forum in the past.
At this point, the debate about Watkins is almost secondary to the manner and content of your posts about him. If you want to ignore that and continue as is, that is your right too, but it’s diminishing the value and joy people get from this forum, or at least, this thread.
