collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

MOTD by Chap
[Today at 10:45:47 PM]


Ollie Watkins by Ian.
[Today at 10:34:49 PM]


Total Press-ing by Legion
[Today at 10:34:17 PM]


Winter 25-26 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by PaulWinch again
[Today at 10:34:09 PM]


Aston Villa vs Man United Post-Match Thread by Meanwood Villa
[Today at 10:34:05 PM]


Villa Park Redevelopment by Somniloquism
[Today at 10:27:36 PM]


Matty Cash by BoVillan esq
[Today at 10:07:36 PM]


Emi Martinez by BoVillan esq
[Today at 10:03:26 PM]

Recent Posts

Re: MOTD by Chap
[Today at 10:45:47 PM]


Re: MOTD by Chap
[Today at 10:44:32 PM]


Re: MOTD by Somniloquism
[Today at 10:44:22 PM]


Re: MOTD by Meanwood Villa
[Today at 10:41:35 PM]


Re: MOTD by astonvilla82
[Today at 10:37:18 PM]


Re: Ollie Watkins by Ian.
[Today at 10:34:49 PM]


Re: Total Press-ing by Legion
[Today at 10:34:17 PM]


Re: Winter 25-26 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by PaulWinch again
[Today at 10:34:09 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Ollie Watkins  (Read 1048149 times)

Online PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 56666
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #9975 on: Today at 08:44:43 PM »
It was clearly about Smirker as he mentioned 10 men.

It was, and there’s only one person in the entire history of this forum that doesn’t understand what an assist is and why they matter.

How many has he got this season?

Hardly any - so reasonable criticism is pretty easy. It’s the gleeful, factually inaccurate stuff that seems a bit odd.

Right, but some of the rebuttals seem quite gleeful too. Almost like people have picked a side and are defending it vigorously, and with great vim. It can’t really be for any other reason because he’s been shit for ages.

Or just maybe, they see a player who has done a hell of a lot to get the club to where it is and probably deserves a bit more respect. He’s having a ropey season, I don’t think anyone would argue that, it’s obvious. But to get to the point of arguing that his assist is meaningless is weird.

Offline Sexual Ealing

  • Member
  • Posts: 24254
  • Location: Salop
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #9976 on: Today at 08:45:38 PM »
I didn’t argue that.

Offline PeterWithesShin

  • Member
  • Posts: 79003
  • GM : 17.03.2015
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #9977 on: Today at 08:47:58 PM »
It's obvious, again, that it was answering your question while talking about what Smirker has said.

Online PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 56666
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #9978 on: Today at 08:48:20 PM »
Correct.

Online Brazilian Villain

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 53011
  • GM : 25.07.2026
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #9979 on: Today at 08:49:44 PM »
Ah lads now, it's Christmas.

I did call my uncle a prick last Christmas...

Did things ever recover?

Last I heard, he was still a prick.

Offline Sexual Ealing

  • Member
  • Posts: 24254
  • Location: Salop
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #9980 on: Today at 08:50:33 PM »
Perhaps argue with Smirker’s posts when he is posting, and mine when I am?

Offline PeterWithesShin

  • Member
  • Posts: 79003
  • GM : 17.03.2015
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #9981 on: Today at 08:53:16 PM »
They have, and then you keep questioning it so they have to reply to you and say it again.

Online PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 56666
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #9982 on: Today at 08:53:52 PM »
Perhaps argue with Smirker’s posts when he is posting, and mine when I am?

Well you started debating with me on a comment I made about his view of assists.

Offline Sexual Ealing

  • Member
  • Posts: 24254
  • Location: Salop
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #9983 on: Today at 08:56:10 PM »
Perhaps argue with Smirker’s posts when he is posting, and mine when I am?

Well you started debating with me on a comment I made about his view of assists.

Ok, I may have misread this whole forum thing, but I thought anyone could write what they wanted to without acting as a proxy for someone else. If you’d like to allocate me a window just let me know.

Online Smirker

  • Member
  • Posts: 7848
  • Location: Birmingham
  • GM : Sep, 2014
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #9984 on: Today at 09:22:51 PM »
It was clearly about Smirker as he mentioned 10 men.

It was, and there’s only one person in the entire history of this forum that doesn’t understand what an assist is and why they matter.

Why are you lying?

If I say "Player 1 has only got 2 goals in 20 games. I think his goalscoring is bad"

And you say "But he's also got 4 assists"

I am going to disregard the assists because I am talking about goals.

That is what this Watkins debacle started as.

You are carrying it on every time you lie and claim I said outright that assists don't matter.

Online ChicagoLion

  • Member
  • Posts: 27213
  • Location: Chicago
  • Literally
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #9985 on: Today at 09:30:24 PM »
He was poor again today, but Emery is playing him for a reason.
We do not gave any one else to play his role and right now this is the way Emery who is delivering an incredible run is setting the team up.

Offline PeterWithesShin

  • Member
  • Posts: 79003
  • GM : 17.03.2015
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #9986 on: Today at 09:32:05 PM »
Malen showed why Ollie starts even when off it. Until we have a better option then it will be Ollie starting most games.

Online ChicagoLion

  • Member
  • Posts: 27213
  • Location: Chicago
  • Literally
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #9987 on: Today at 09:35:37 PM »
Malen showed why Ollie starts even when off it. Until we have a better option then it will be Ollie starting most games.
exactly.

Online Ian.

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 16410
  • Location: Back home in the Shire
  • GM : 09.01.2026
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #9988 on: Today at 09:35:49 PM »
Malen showed why Ollie starts even when off it. Until we have a better option then it will be Ollie starting most games.

This is why there’s very little point to Smirker going off on one every time we play. We don’t have an alternative option. Ollie’s miles off form, I get it, buts he’s the only player we have to play on his own up top without changing a winning formula.

Offline Hopadop

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4573
  • Location: North London
  • GM : 25.10.2026
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #9989 on: Today at 09:42:50 PM »
I don't think he was ever a great striker, even at his best, but he was an effective one. And if you accept it's a game of fine margins he must still be.

We can't have got this far otherwise.  It beggars belief.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal