collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Ollie Watkins  (Read 1036878 times)

Online PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 56580
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #9780 on: Today at 01:40:46 PM »
That’s nonsense Ian, they’ll all score at least 38 league goals a season.

Online LeeB

  • Member
  • Posts: 36064
  • Location: Standing in the Klix-O-Gum queue.
  • GM : May, 2014
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #9781 on: Today at 01:40:50 PM »
Funny enough, this weekend I’ve seen quite a few elite strikers miss chances or had the keeper save them. I saw Thiago look pretty awful, sluggish and immobile, which would make him a terrible signing if he’s to replace Ollie.

That fella for Wolves though is shocking.

The best header of the weekend went to Woltemade, peach of strike.

His eyes lit up at that cross, neck muscles pulled back, back arched, wonderful technique.

Offline Smirker

  • Member
  • Posts: 7780
  • Location: Birmingham
  • GM : Sep, 2014
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #9782 on: Today at 01:41:07 PM »
Oh yes, it was entirely Watkins fault. It’s so weird to hate a Villa player who has delivered so much.

We couldn't score a goal. So yes it was largely his fault as our only striker.

You think we have to delude ourselves into believing he's still good enough because he was in the past? Nope.

Online German James

  • Member
  • Posts: 6611
  • Location: 438.5 miles away
    • The Limpets
  • GM : 13.02.2025
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #9783 on: Today at 01:56:42 PM »
It's a perfectly rational position to take that, although Watkins has been brilliant for us, he isn't scoring anywhere near enough goals this season. I don't really understand what the one statement has to do with the other.

Online PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 56580
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #9784 on: Today at 02:02:00 PM »
That is remarkably simplistic - did you watch any of the games? We produced virtually nothing at the start of the season. That’s why some people were calling Rogers hopeless.

Let’s be clear, I have no issue with call outs on Watkins being out of form - he patently has been. But he played well and scored twice against Brighton, played well and forced two good saves against Arsenal, and played a key part in us equalising yesterday. He is looking better, and this boring, pretty active, campaign to suggest he’s useless is just very weird.

Online Rudy Can't Fail

  • Member
  • Posts: 41918
  • Location: In the Shade
    • http://www.heroespredictions.co.uk/pl/
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #9785 on: Today at 02:28:27 PM »
Let’s be clear, I have no issue with call outs on Watkins being out of form - he patently has been. But he played well and scored twice against Brighton, played well and forced two good saves against Arsenal, and played a key part in us equalising yesterday. He is looking better, and this boring, pretty active, campaign to suggest he’s useless is just very weird.

Alternatively you could say he shot straight at the keeper against Arsenal (having brilliantly put himself in the position to shoot) and yesterday he missed a clear opportunity that normally he would have buried.

In his defence, I don't believe Watkins' form has dropped overnight so much compared to previous seasons without there being a reason other than 'he's crap'. You don't just lose a yard of pace overnight. I believe he's carrying an injury and is doing his best. His best may not be good enough for the rest of the season but he has played his part this season all be it without the goals. If we can get through until January maybe we can get him fixed whilst somebody else comes in to play the CF role.

Then we have him fully fit and fully motivated to finish the season on a high.

Online German James

  • Member
  • Posts: 6611
  • Location: 438.5 miles away
    • The Limpets
  • GM : 13.02.2025
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #9786 on: Today at 02:35:27 PM »
He is looking better. And his work ethic, attitude and general play really can't be faulted by anyone sane... But he's is supposed to be our major goal threat, and to say he isn't/ hasn't been is a huge understatement! I think that's all anyone's moaning about, isn't it?
The problem's more obvious because of his position: no-one suggests John McGinn isn't scoring enough.

Online paul_e

  • Member
  • Posts: 38302
  • Age: 46
  • GM : July, 2013
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #9787 on: Today at 03:03:09 PM »
He is looking better. And his work ethic, attitude and general play really can't be faulted by anyone sane... But he's is supposed to be our major goal threat, and to say he isn't/ hasn't been is a huge understatement! I think that's all anyone's moaning about, isn't it?
The problem's more obvious because of his position: no-one suggests John McGinn isn't scoring enough.

If Smirker didn't keep going with the 'shit for 18months' line I think far fewer people would argue (and If I'm honest I wish people would just ignore it for the attention seeking it has become).

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal