collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Ollie Watkins by john2710
[Today at 03:01:44 PM]


Amadou Onana by PaulWinch again
[Today at 02:59:56 PM]


Evann Guessand by Smirker
[Today at 02:40:52 PM]


GUESS THE GOAL R8: Liverpool v ASTON VILLA, Saturday 1st November!🥅 by Louzie0
[Today at 02:15:09 PM]


Liverpool v Doctor Villa Post Match Thread. by Ads
[Today at 02:08:22 PM]


Aston Villa Women 2025-26 by VILLA MOLE
[Today at 02:02:06 PM]


I know none of you care but ........ (the Baseball thread) by PeterWithesShin
[Today at 01:49:57 PM]


Emi Martinez by oldhill_avfc
[Today at 01:25:42 PM]

Recent Posts

Re: Ollie Watkins by john2710
[Today at 03:01:44 PM]


Re: Amadou Onana by PaulWinch again
[Today at 02:59:56 PM]


Re: Evann Guessand by Smirker
[Today at 02:40:52 PM]


Re: Evann Guessand by VILLA MOLE
[Today at 02:32:37 PM]


Re: Evann Guessand by russon
[Today at 02:30:20 PM]


Re: Evann Guessand by AV82EC
[Today at 02:29:35 PM]


Re: Evann Guessand by Drummond
[Today at 02:27:14 PM]


Re: Ollie Watkins by Smirker
[Today at 02:25:57 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Ollie Watkins  (Read 975242 times)

Offline Meanwood Villa

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 8849
  • GM : PCM
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #9090 on: Today at 01:31:57 AM »
Didn't watch the second half because of been one nil down and the Liverpool commentators, how was he second half, sensible replies please

Barely touched it. Malen, Barkley and Sancho all looked more dangerous when they came on.

Online ChicagoLion

  • Member
  • Posts: 26946
  • Location: Chicago
  • Literally
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #9091 on: Today at 07:35:15 AM »
Didn't watch the second half because of been one nil down and the Liverpool commentators, how was he second half, sensible replies please
Like most of the Villa team worse than in the first half.

Online john2710

  • Member
  • Posts: 3145
  • Location: Hall Green
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #9092 on: Today at 08:18:51 AM »
He looks poor because the whole team looks poor from an attacking point.

We've replaced Rashford / Sancho, Bailey / Guessand & Asensio / Elliott. All of whom have contributed nothing.

Add in the fact that we've lost the creativity from Tielemans & you can see why we struggle.

With the service he's getting it would be difficult for anyone to look good.

Online PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 56135
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #9093 on: Today at 08:22:36 AM »
He looks poor because the whole team looks poor from an attacking point.

We've replaced Rashford / Sancho, Bailey / Guessand & Asensio / Elliott. All of whom have contributed nothing.

Add in the fact that we've lost the creativity from Tielemans & you can see why we struggle.

With the service he's getting it would be difficult for anyone to look good.

Yep largely agree with that. We are not creating the chances you’d expect a centre forward to take.

Offline LeeB

  • Member
  • Posts: 35859
  • Location: Standing in the Klix-O-Gum queue.
  • GM : May, 2014
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #9094 on: Today at 09:43:38 AM »
There's quite a lot of times of late when he doesn't even look like a Premier League player let alone a top one.

Offline LeeB

  • Member
  • Posts: 35859
  • Location: Standing in the Klix-O-Gum queue.
  • GM : May, 2014
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #9095 on: Today at 09:46:04 AM »
He looks poor because the whole team looks poor from an attacking point.

We've replaced Rashford / Sancho, Bailey / Guessand & Asensio / Elliott. All of whom have contributed nothing.

Add in the fact that we've lost the creativity from Tielemans & you can see why we struggle.

With the service he's getting it would be difficult for anyone to look good.

And to be honest I'm a bit sick of the 'creating chances for him' stuff, it's hard to get up the pitch if he keeps giving the ball away and he was just as bad (and moaning about it) when we had the players listed above.

Online PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 56135
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #9096 on: Today at 09:48:28 AM »
I just think some people have a particular negative view and are locked in on that. He’s clearly struggling - but it’s no coincidence that it coincides with us creating very few chances. He was very good against Citeh, that was a game ago.

Offline LeeB

  • Member
  • Posts: 35859
  • Location: Standing in the Klix-O-Gum queue.
  • GM : May, 2014
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #9097 on: Today at 09:51:05 AM »
He was alright against City and ballsed a clean through he was clear favourite to reach, I think some people have a clear positive view and are locked in on that.

Online aj2k77

  • Member
  • Posts: 11998
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #9098 on: Today at 09:52:59 AM »
We create nothing. Going forward we are neutered by having total guff like Guessand not having the ability to contribute attacking wise. We've gone from Bailey, Diaby, Asensio and Rashford to Guessand, Malen, Elliot and Sancho.

Massive step down. The later two have contributed nothing this season at all apart from costing us a shed load of wages and Guessand is a bust. Monchi's parting gift in his shit show of transfer windows.

Ollie isn't the problem.

Offline N'ZMAV

  • Member
  • Posts: 10400
  • Location: Kidderminster
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #9099 on: Today at 09:53:35 AM »
we're not creating anywhere near enough - wonder if Harvey Elliott is a better option.

Offline LeeB

  • Member
  • Posts: 35859
  • Location: Standing in the Klix-O-Gum queue.
  • GM : May, 2014
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #9100 on: Today at 09:56:18 AM »
Ollie is part of the problem and has been for about 18 months, but as we're financially constrained here we are.

If you don't agree, ask your self why the manager was starting an on loan natural left winger in front of him in the biggest games last season.

Online Smirker

  • Member
  • Posts: 7461
  • Location: Birmingham
  • GM : Sep, 2014
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #9101 on: Today at 11:19:25 AM »
we're not creating anywhere near enough - wonder if Harvey Elliott is a better option.

The hypocrisy surrounding this player is ridiculous.

I say he doesn't score enough goals and people say "but he gets a lot of assists!"

Well how many of those has he got this season? He is also part of that problem.

Last time I checked he was also allowed to create chances for others.

Offline LeeB

  • Member
  • Posts: 35859
  • Location: Standing in the Klix-O-Gum queue.
  • GM : May, 2014
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #9102 on: Today at 11:21:35 AM »
Trying to create chances when he should shoot and shooting when he should create chances is part of the problem.

Online Monty

  • Member
  • Posts: 29641
  • Location: pastaland
  • GM : 25.05.2024
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #9103 on: Today at 11:21:54 AM »
Go and learn what 'hypocrisy' means.

Offline N'ZMAV

  • Member
  • Posts: 10400
  • Location: Kidderminster
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #9104 on: Today at 11:28:09 AM »
if we want to get into the Champions League season after season then we need Ollie to score more to get us there, but he needs more opportunities/chances creating for him - but to be fair, he's also pretty wasteful - all in all, to summarise, all the forward players need to do better.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal