Quote from: ChicagoLion on June 09, 2016, 07:15:21 PMQuote from: mike on June 09, 2016, 02:00:07 PMGoing back to the issue of us thinking Culverhouse and Karsa would be a good backroom team, I re-read an old article which made a big deal of Gabby and others not liking their training methods. Now, I'd find it hard to believe they got sacked for asking him to do a bit of training and cut down on the pies, as I suspect they would have gone to a tribunal (or whatever recourse they had). However, it makes you realise there may have been a bit more of two sides to the story than we thought. As far as I'm aware, it's never really been disclosed what went on.the fact they were suspended then fired without compensation is a clue though.Which is sort of what I said in my original post. But, to mangle the relevance of a quotation, history is written by the victors. I'm sure they did something 'wrong', but how much was it all exacerbated by working with a bunch of lazy, arrogant twats. Or maybe Gabby was the good guy in all of this.
Quote from: mike on June 09, 2016, 02:00:07 PMGoing back to the issue of us thinking Culverhouse and Karsa would be a good backroom team, I re-read an old article which made a big deal of Gabby and others not liking their training methods. Now, I'd find it hard to believe they got sacked for asking him to do a bit of training and cut down on the pies, as I suspect they would have gone to a tribunal (or whatever recourse they had). However, it makes you realise there may have been a bit more of two sides to the story than we thought. As far as I'm aware, it's never really been disclosed what went on.the fact they were suspended then fired without compensation is a clue though.
Going back to the issue of us thinking Culverhouse and Karsa would be a good backroom team, I re-read an old article which made a big deal of Gabby and others not liking their training methods. Now, I'd find it hard to believe they got sacked for asking him to do a bit of training and cut down on the pies, as I suspect they would have gone to a tribunal (or whatever recourse they had). However, it makes you realise there may have been a bit more of two sides to the story than we thought. As far as I'm aware, it's never really been disclosed what went on.
Quote from: Rudy Can't Fail on June 08, 2016, 02:00:58 PMQuote from: Stirchley Villain on June 08, 2016, 12:55:23 PMQuote from: Bad English on June 08, 2016, 12:50:00 PMQuote from: Stirchley Villain on June 08, 2016, 11:32:19 AM "filho/filha do/da puta" is a general expletive in the Portuguese language, a bit like FFS or son of a bitch is in ours. I don't think she was wrong to take offence though.A 'general' expletive? Calling one's mother a whore? Really? I will let Rudy comment on the Portuguese but in French calling someone a 'fils/fille de pute" is almost as bad as calling someone a 'c***' in English.Yes really. You can stub your toe alone and say filho da puta. It doesn't necessarily have to be directed at a person.. True but when it is you can hardly complain if you get punched in the face. It really depends how it's said. Even said jokingly amongst friends you're on wobbly ground. It's far more offensive than 'son of a bitch', as BE said, it's more 'son of a prostitute/whore'. As the Portuguese love their mothers so much, it's pretty much the most offensive thing you can say to somebody.disagree a bit with this. It's the British way to greet friends or close acquantancies offensively. I used to work in hackney at the council and there was a lad there, villa fan from Northampton, who used to cheerily greet me of a morning: alright you c***? Here in aus, the locals don't get it so much, but the poms are very forthcoming with 'friendly' insults. It doesn't bother me and never will. Can see how some may be offended though.
Quote from: Stirchley Villain on June 08, 2016, 12:55:23 PMQuote from: Bad English on June 08, 2016, 12:50:00 PMQuote from: Stirchley Villain on June 08, 2016, 11:32:19 AM "filho/filha do/da puta" is a general expletive in the Portuguese language, a bit like FFS or son of a bitch is in ours. I don't think she was wrong to take offence though.A 'general' expletive? Calling one's mother a whore? Really? I will let Rudy comment on the Portuguese but in French calling someone a 'fils/fille de pute" is almost as bad as calling someone a 'c***' in English.Yes really. You can stub your toe alone and say filho da puta. It doesn't necessarily have to be directed at a person.. True but when it is you can hardly complain if you get punched in the face. It really depends how it's said. Even said jokingly amongst friends you're on wobbly ground. It's far more offensive than 'son of a bitch', as BE said, it's more 'son of a prostitute/whore'. As the Portuguese love their mothers so much, it's pretty much the most offensive thing you can say to somebody.
Quote from: Bad English on June 08, 2016, 12:50:00 PMQuote from: Stirchley Villain on June 08, 2016, 11:32:19 AM "filho/filha do/da puta" is a general expletive in the Portuguese language, a bit like FFS or son of a bitch is in ours. I don't think she was wrong to take offence though.A 'general' expletive? Calling one's mother a whore? Really? I will let Rudy comment on the Portuguese but in French calling someone a 'fils/fille de pute" is almost as bad as calling someone a 'c***' in English.Yes really. You can stub your toe alone and say filho da puta. It doesn't necessarily have to be directed at a person..
Quote from: Stirchley Villain on June 08, 2016, 11:32:19 AM "filho/filha do/da puta" is a general expletive in the Portuguese language, a bit like FFS or son of a bitch is in ours. I don't think she was wrong to take offence though.A 'general' expletive? Calling one's mother a whore? Really? I will let Rudy comment on the Portuguese but in French calling someone a 'fils/fille de pute" is almost as bad as calling someone a 'c***' in English.
"filho/filha do/da puta" is a general expletive in the Portuguese language, a bit like FFS or son of a bitch is in ours. I don't think she was wrong to take offence though.
Quote from: robbo1874 on June 09, 2016, 01:16:29 PMQuote from: Rudy Can't Fail on June 08, 2016, 02:00:58 PMQuote from: Stirchley Villain on June 08, 2016, 12:55:23 PMQuote from: Bad English on June 08, 2016, 12:50:00 PMQuote from: Stirchley Villain on June 08, 2016, 11:32:19 AM "filho/filha do/da puta" is a general expletive in the Portuguese language, a bit like FFS or son of a bitch is in ours. I don't think she was wrong to take offence though.A 'general' expletive? Calling one's mother a whore? Really? I will let Rudy comment on the Portuguese but in French calling someone a 'fils/fille de pute" is almost as bad as calling someone a 'c***' in English.Yes really. You can stub your toe alone and say filho da puta. It doesn't necessarily have to be directed at a person.. True but when it is you can hardly complain if you get punched in the face. It really depends how it's said. Even said jokingly amongst friends you're on wobbly ground. It's far more offensive than 'son of a bitch', as BE said, it's more 'son of a prostitute/whore'. As the Portuguese love their mothers so much, it's pretty much the most offensive thing you can say to somebody.disagree a bit with this. It's the British way to greet friends or close acquantancies offensively. I used to work in hackney at the council and there was a lad there, villa fan from Northampton, who used to cheerily greet me of a morning: alright you c***? Here in aus, the locals don't get it so much, but the poms are very forthcoming with 'friendly' insults. It doesn't bother me and never will. Can see how some may be offended though.Interestingly a Brazilian mainstream TV programme about refs has just been released called Filhos da Puta. Kinda shoots down the argument that it's the most offensive phrase you can use in the Portuguese language. It's on C4 Walter if anyone's interested.
I guess he wants to assess quickly so he can start getting rid/bringing players in. Not hanging around, good on him.
Di Matteo brings a very quiet intelligence and confidence about him and it's good to know he has a reputable coach (if not manager) working with him.