Quote from: eliotpollak on Today at 03:28:14 PMQuote from: Somniloquism on Today at 03:22:31 PMQuote from: eliotpollak on Today at 03:09:19 PMQuote from: Somniloquism on Today at 03:04:17 PMSo I take you are going with it is neccessay to protect the Jews from locals, hence the shame, and not it is neccesary to protect the locals from the same thing that MTA fans did in Greece and Amsterdam?Yes because a) that’s what the police statement said and b) if the game was in London or Norwich or Plymouth, there wouldn’t be a problem, which implies the locals are the issues.Can you show me a citation that it would not be a problem in London, Norwich or Plymouth? Also, you are ok with MTA fans attacking Muslims in other cities?No, because it’s what’s called a hypothetical. I believe it to be true however. Israeli clubs have played in Stoke, Manchester, London before with no problems.And no, bc I’m not in favour of anyone being attacked.So because matches happened in 2011, 2002 and I'm assuming a similar time frame for the London matches, you believe a match taking place today would not have banned away supporters? Especially ones who have a small recent history of attacking locals of certain persuasions. Didn''t the national Police organisation who supposedly informed the HO it was going to be an away fans ban state they totally stood by the decision?
Quote from: Somniloquism on Today at 03:22:31 PMQuote from: eliotpollak on Today at 03:09:19 PMQuote from: Somniloquism on Today at 03:04:17 PMSo I take you are going with it is neccessay to protect the Jews from locals, hence the shame, and not it is neccesary to protect the locals from the same thing that MTA fans did in Greece and Amsterdam?Yes because a) that’s what the police statement said and b) if the game was in London or Norwich or Plymouth, there wouldn’t be a problem, which implies the locals are the issues.Can you show me a citation that it would not be a problem in London, Norwich or Plymouth? Also, you are ok with MTA fans attacking Muslims in other cities?No, because it’s what’s called a hypothetical. I believe it to be true however. Israeli clubs have played in Stoke, Manchester, London before with no problems.And no, bc I’m not in favour of anyone being attacked.
Quote from: eliotpollak on Today at 03:09:19 PMQuote from: Somniloquism on Today at 03:04:17 PMSo I take you are going with it is neccessay to protect the Jews from locals, hence the shame, and not it is neccesary to protect the locals from the same thing that MTA fans did in Greece and Amsterdam?Yes because a) that’s what the police statement said and b) if the game was in London or Norwich or Plymouth, there wouldn’t be a problem, which implies the locals are the issues.Can you show me a citation that it would not be a problem in London, Norwich or Plymouth? Also, you are ok with MTA fans attacking Muslims in other cities?
Quote from: Somniloquism on Today at 03:04:17 PMSo I take you are going with it is neccessay to protect the Jews from locals, hence the shame, and not it is neccesary to protect the locals from the same thing that MTA fans did in Greece and Amsterdam?Yes because a) that’s what the police statement said and b) if the game was in London or Norwich or Plymouth, there wouldn’t be a problem, which implies the locals are the issues.
So I take you are going with it is neccessay to protect the Jews from locals, hence the shame, and not it is neccesary to protect the locals from the same thing that MTA fans did in Greece and Amsterdam?
Quote from: Dave on Today at 03:33:41 PMQuote from: eliotpollak on Today at 03:30:16 PMAnd that the police statement did not refer to any trouble they would be instigating, only their safety. So I’m not saying that, the police are. I've read it twice now, and don't see where it says that. It does clearly say though that it's because of what happened at a previous Maccabi match.QuoteWest Midlands Police has a strong track record of successfully policing football matches and other high-risk public events.We are committed to delivering fair and impartial policing, while balancing the public’s right to protest with our duty to ensure public safety.Following a thorough assessment, we have classified the upcoming Aston Villa vs Maccabi Tel-Aviv fixture as high risk.We have actively engaged with a wide range of local partners and community representatives in preparation for this fixture, and continue to participate in the Safety Advisory Group.While the Safety Certificate is issued by Birmingham City Council, West Midlands Police supports the decision to prohibit away supporters from attending.This decision is based on current intelligence and previous incidents, including violent clashes and hate crime offences that occurred during the 2024 UEFA Europa League match between Ajax and Maccabi Tel-Aviv in Amsterdam.Based on our professional judgement, we believe this measure will help mitigate risks to public safety.We remain steadfast in our support all affected communities, and reaffirm our zero-tolerance stance on hate crime in all its forms.The second paragraph is key. ‘Balance the right to protest with public safety’. Who will be protesting. So whose safety is at risk?When the same phrase was used to ban the UKIP or whatever they’re called march in Tower Hamlets tomorrow, whose safety was at risk. It wasn’t the marchers.
Quote from: eliotpollak on Today at 03:30:16 PMAnd that the police statement did not refer to any trouble they would be instigating, only their safety. So I’m not saying that, the police are. I've read it twice now, and don't see where it says that. It does clearly say though that it's because of what happened at a previous Maccabi match.QuoteWest Midlands Police has a strong track record of successfully policing football matches and other high-risk public events.We are committed to delivering fair and impartial policing, while balancing the public’s right to protest with our duty to ensure public safety.Following a thorough assessment, we have classified the upcoming Aston Villa vs Maccabi Tel-Aviv fixture as high risk.We have actively engaged with a wide range of local partners and community representatives in preparation for this fixture, and continue to participate in the Safety Advisory Group.While the Safety Certificate is issued by Birmingham City Council, West Midlands Police supports the decision to prohibit away supporters from attending.This decision is based on current intelligence and previous incidents, including violent clashes and hate crime offences that occurred during the 2024 UEFA Europa League match between Ajax and Maccabi Tel-Aviv in Amsterdam.Based on our professional judgement, we believe this measure will help mitigate risks to public safety.We remain steadfast in our support all affected communities, and reaffirm our zero-tolerance stance on hate crime in all its forms.
And that the police statement did not refer to any trouble they would be instigating, only their safety. So I’m not saying that, the police are.
West Midlands Police has a strong track record of successfully policing football matches and other high-risk public events.We are committed to delivering fair and impartial policing, while balancing the public’s right to protest with our duty to ensure public safety.Following a thorough assessment, we have classified the upcoming Aston Villa vs Maccabi Tel-Aviv fixture as high risk.We have actively engaged with a wide range of local partners and community representatives in preparation for this fixture, and continue to participate in the Safety Advisory Group.While the Safety Certificate is issued by Birmingham City Council, West Midlands Police supports the decision to prohibit away supporters from attending.This decision is based on current intelligence and previous incidents, including violent clashes and hate crime offences that occurred during the 2024 UEFA Europa League match between Ajax and Maccabi Tel-Aviv in Amsterdam.Based on our professional judgement, we believe this measure will help mitigate risks to public safety.We remain steadfast in our support all affected communities, and reaffirm our zero-tolerance stance on hate crime in all its forms.
You think that bit is more key than: QuoteThis decision is based on current intelligence and previous incidents, including violent clashes and hate crime offences that occurred during the 2024 UEFA Europa League match between Ajax and Maccabi Tel-Aviv in AmsterdamThat looks pretty clear to me as the reason. Given that they say it's the reason.
This decision is based on current intelligence and previous incidents, including violent clashes and hate crime offences that occurred during the 2024 UEFA Europa League match between Ajax and Maccabi Tel-Aviv in Amsterdam
Why have a Jewish Fan group anyway? We don’t have Catholic, Protestant, Methodist, Hindu, Muslim, Baprist, Scientology or any other individual groups. We might have a Christian group but that’s a catch all if you believe in a particular God. It doesn’t do us any particular good or bad for that matter, all a bit pointless really We’re Villa fans first and foremost when we’re at the game and that’s all that matters.
So you have never seen the Amsterdam footage or Greece footage? Surprised being as surely you would want all the information at hand being as you got the police report. Any chance of posting a link to it somewhere?
Quote from: Drummond on Today at 03:23:16 PMAre you saying there's no issue with the Maccabi fans' behaviour?I’m saying there is no more reason to ban them due to their behaviour than there would be 90% of clubs from Europe. And that the police statement did not refer to any trouble they would be instigating, only their safety. So I’m not saying that, the police are.
Are you saying there's no issue with the Maccabi fans' behaviour?
Could probably have all saved ourselves a bit of time if he'd just posted "I'm right and everyone who disagrees with me is antisemitic" in his first post.
So, given all of those conversations, why isn't the information made public, because that would surely help the general population understand better.