The difference between Tielemans and Elliott is that Tielemans was our player. We had signed him, he wasnt on loan.If you are bringing in a loanee, with an intent to buy or not, he doesn’t have the same benefit of time being on his side.Why on earth bring in a loanee, at great cost, and then not play him ?Unless of course, he was a complete panic acquisition and is not particularly needed or wanted.
I thought he had to play 10 games before it became permenent?
Quote from: Chris Smith on Today at 12:26:08 PMHow long did Tielemans have to wait before Emery trusted him? I think it’s as simple as that. He plays in such a key position and until Unai has 100% confident that he is ready he’ll be a bit-part player at bestI think this is more logical than the number-of-matches thing, but it's weird how Guessand is fine and doesn't need any time to bed in at all.
How long did Tielemans have to wait before Emery trusted him? I think it’s as simple as that. He plays in such a key position and until Unai has 100% confident that he is ready he’ll be a bit-part player at best
Quote from: Dave on Today at 12:45:16 PMQuote from: Chris Smith on Today at 12:26:08 PMHow long did Tielemans have to wait before Emery trusted him? I think it’s as simple as that. He plays in such a key position and until Unai has 100% confident that he is ready he’ll be a bit-part player at bestI think this is more logical than the number-of-matches thing, but it's weird how Guessand is fine and doesn't need any time to bed in at all. Maybe a combination of he has options in central midfield so can afford to be patient annd even though his end product is lacking Guessand is doing the job asked of him.
Quote from: Dave on Today at 12:45:16 PMQuote from: Chris Smith on Today at 12:26:08 PMHow long did Tielemans have to wait before Emery trusted him? I think it’s as simple as that. He plays in such a key position and until Unai has 100% confident that he is ready he’ll be a bit-part player at bestI think this is more logical than the number-of-matches thing, but it's weird how Guessand is fine and doesn't need any time to bed in at all. I wonder if it’s just the fact that playing in front of Cash, he wants someone like Guessand who’s willing to work back and help out with the dirty work. That’s one area I have been impressed with him. It’s also coincided with Cash improving.Elliot’s role is probably very different.
We really lack pace up front and whatever he is, Elliott isn't that. I'd put Sancho in for Guessand.
Quote from: Chris Smith on Today at 01:39:12 PMQuote from: Dave on Today at 12:45:16 PMQuote from: Chris Smith on Today at 12:26:08 PMHow long did Tielemans have to wait before Emery trusted him? I think it’s as simple as that. He plays in such a key position and until Unai has 100% confident that he is ready he’ll be a bit-part player at bestI think this is more logical than the number-of-matches thing, but it's weird how Guessand is fine and doesn't need any time to bed in at all. Maybe a combination of he has options in central midfield so can afford to be patient annd even though his end product is lacking Guessand is doing the job asked of him.But Elliott isn't really a central-midfielder - he plays in that slightly wide-right postition that McGinn does for us. When we signed him, the talk was the he wanted to leave Liverpool because he wasn't getting enough opportunity with Salah being undroppable in the position he would have played for them.Which would mean that he would doing a combination of the job that McGinn / Malen / Guessand has done for us so far.