Quote from: Risso on May 29, 2024, 02:35:54 PMQuote from: Rudy Can't Fail on May 29, 2024, 02:21:46 PMQuote from: Risso on May 29, 2024, 02:01:57 PMQuote from: kippaxvilla2 on May 29, 2024, 01:59:13 PMIs it me or do they always come across as ‘sniffy’?I'd go further and say actually confrontational.At best, Sir Humphrey Appleby. Worst - take your pick, they certainly sound like these meetings are a waste of their time and who are these plebs to question them. Heck may have found an excuse to no longer attend the meetings but he is personally responsible for the tone of his team unless new COO Ben Hatton is some kind of narcissist.I do wonder about the future of these meetings. The Club will probably hang on in there before the fans drop them completely. Nobody can accuse the Club of blowing smoke up the arse of the fans, I'll give them that.I know Jon Fear gets a bad rap at times, but he's got the right idea in my opinion and told them that his group will have nothing more to do with the meetings.Should I do that? It's a serious question.
Quote from: Rudy Can't Fail on May 29, 2024, 02:21:46 PMQuote from: Risso on May 29, 2024, 02:01:57 PMQuote from: kippaxvilla2 on May 29, 2024, 01:59:13 PMIs it me or do they always come across as ‘sniffy’?I'd go further and say actually confrontational.At best, Sir Humphrey Appleby. Worst - take your pick, they certainly sound like these meetings are a waste of their time and who are these plebs to question them. Heck may have found an excuse to no longer attend the meetings but he is personally responsible for the tone of his team unless new COO Ben Hatton is some kind of narcissist.I do wonder about the future of these meetings. The Club will probably hang on in there before the fans drop them completely. Nobody can accuse the Club of blowing smoke up the arse of the fans, I'll give them that.I know Jon Fear gets a bad rap at times, but he's got the right idea in my opinion and told them that his group will have nothing more to do with the meetings.
Quote from: Risso on May 29, 2024, 02:01:57 PMQuote from: kippaxvilla2 on May 29, 2024, 01:59:13 PMIs it me or do they always come across as ‘sniffy’?I'd go further and say actually confrontational.At best, Sir Humphrey Appleby. Worst - take your pick, they certainly sound like these meetings are a waste of their time and who are these plebs to question them. Heck may have found an excuse to no longer attend the meetings but he is personally responsible for the tone of his team unless new COO Ben Hatton is some kind of narcissist.I do wonder about the future of these meetings. The Club will probably hang on in there before the fans drop them completely. Nobody can accuse the Club of blowing smoke up the arse of the fans, I'll give them that.
Quote from: kippaxvilla2 on May 29, 2024, 01:59:13 PMIs it me or do they always come across as ‘sniffy’?I'd go further and say actually confrontational.
Is it me or do they always come across as ‘sniffy’?
Quote from: VillaTim on May 29, 2024, 09:12:17 PMI applaud anyone who takes the time , effort and commitment to go to these meetings . I'm not sure the club would lose any sleep if the fans walked away . They'd probably put a spin on it saying a bunch of militants were attending anyway. It's a tough one but I don't think the club see it as anything more than a tick box exercise sadly . They really don't care. They have to hold them, under the new Premier League rules. I guess they don't have to pretend to care about any questions or points made though.
I applaud anyone who takes the time , effort and commitment to go to these meetings . I'm not sure the club would lose any sleep if the fans walked away . They'd probably put a spin on it saying a bunch of militants were attending anyway. It's a tough one but I don't think the club see it as anything more than a tick box exercise sadly . They really don't care.
Quote from: dave.woodhall on May 29, 2024, 08:40:23 PMShould I do that? It's a serious question. Completely up to you of course. It just sounds like there's a really confrontational edge to proceedings and the basic message coming out is they can do what they like. Under those circumstances it seems a bit pointless to me.
Should I do that? It's a serious question.
Also - and this isn't a dig - I don't think I've ever first read the summary of a FAB meeting anywhere that isn't Villatalk.I don't really see what's in it for us in any way - there's no actual consultation, there's no sense of willing involvement from the club, it's a diktat laid down by them, and we don't even read about it here first.What's the point in Dave or any other representative wasting their time?
7. What is the club doing about the general state of the facilities in washrooms around the ground - who is responsible for this on matchdays and are they sufficiently staffed and empowered - for our last home game there were flooded urinals in both the Upper and Lower Holte from some time before kick-off. Also, the disabled toilets have been in poor condition.As per item 4 in the main agenda “..we are looking to improve the environment for GA ticket holders in all stands..”. We also have a programme of maintenance planned for the summer.
And for the love of god, what is GA?
Quote from: Pat McMahon on May 29, 2024, 10:34:08 PMAnd for the love of god, what is GA?Game attendance. Your ticket. As opposed to GA+, which is stuff like Lower Grounds.
Of course it’s up to you.But what I would say is it’s been obvious for a while these aren’t two way conversations and it’s not doing what it says in the tin.You’re far more intelligent than they are and have far greater knowledge of the Villa. It’s demeaning to you!