I'd sell for £100m because I trust Emery to just find someone else.
Quote from: Smirker on October 10, 2025, 05:41:53 PMI'd sell for £100m because I trust Emery to just find someone else.I don't, our purchases record is whack under the current regime.
I see Touchel is trying to create a team rather than accommodating the stars (Bellingham). This is a good thing in general but Rogers ahead of Bellingham? That’s crazy.
Quote from: eamonn on October 11, 2025, 01:07:03 AMQuote from: Smirker on October 10, 2025, 05:41:53 PMI'd sell for £100m because I trust Emery to just find someone else.I don't, our purchases record is whack under the current regime.Give him a chance he’s been here a month and is yet to sign a player.
He’s worth more than Wirtz
I’ll always be puzzled when some people jump to actively wanting to sell our most talented/best players. I understand we’ll sell eventually, but actively suggesting we’d be wise to sell almost as if the player is going to get found out is odd.
Firstly, if you keep selling players at their peak, you probably won't achieve much. We would most likely have never played in the Champions League if we had sold Watkins and Bailey two years ago.Secondly, you can't really tell for certain when players have reached peak value. Admittedly, it's a bit easier when they are in their thirties but not so much for someone like Rogers. We could easily sell him for sixty million and then see him being valued at twice that in a couple of seasons.Personally, I'd rather we just sold players that I don't want for several hundred million pounds and buy really brilliant players for a pittance. Not sure why we don't try this.