Author Topic: Watkins, Ings, both or neither? (Read 63959 times)

Footy-Vill · « **Reply #405 on:** August 28, 2022, 03:05:33 PM »

I see we started with Watkins and Ings Vs West Ham.
Any good first half ?

Legion · « **Reply #406 on:** August 28, 2022, 03:06:07 PM »

Footy-Vill · « **Reply #407 on:** August 28, 2022, 03:16:18 PM »

Axl Rose · « **Reply #408 on:** August 28, 2022, 03:19:44 PM »

Ollie if it's one up front.

If we go with two up top, Ings and Archer.

Footy-Vill · « **Reply #409 on:** August 31, 2022, 07:04:36 PM »

Watkins has been preferred and SG seems to be saving Ings for Man City
However a positive result could see the same front 3
Gerrard plays this horses for courses but at some point archer to should be given more minutes.

Legion · « **Reply #410 on:** August 31, 2022, 07:09:47 PM »

Archer is carrying a hip injury so on this occasion I hope not. Quite surprised to see him included to be honest. Watch him get 20 minutes now!

Footy-Vill · « **Reply #411 on:** September 01, 2022, 02:24:29 PM »

I think Archer should have been given some game time yesterday.

News:

- On Sale NOW -

Recent Topics

Recent Posts

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Watkins, Ings, both or neither? (Read 63959 times)

Footy-Vill

Re: Watkins, Ings, both or neither?

Legion

Re: Watkins, Ings, both or neither?

Footy-Vill

Re: Watkins, Ings, both or neither?

Axl Rose

Re: Watkins, Ings, both or neither?

Footy-Vill

Re: Watkins, Ings, both or neither?

Legion

Re: Watkins, Ings, both or neither?

Footy-Vill

Re: Watkins, Ings, both or neither?