collapse collapse

* - On Sale NOW -

Claret Blue and Green

The story of Aston Villa’s Irish connection

£9.99 plus postage

For ROW Postage please email iotp@heroespublishing.net

Postal Location

Recent Topics

Pre-season 2026 by SaddVillan
[Today at 07:19:42 PM]


Summer 26 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by eamonn
[Today at 07:18:57 PM]


Alejandro Garnacho - discussion thread by exigo
[Today at 07:17:12 PM]


Other Games 2026/27 by cdbearsfan
[Today at 07:12:11 PM]


Mark Walters by Whiney MacWhineface
[Today at 07:06:13 PM]


FFP by algy
[Today at 07:02:08 PM]


Morgan Rogers - f**king off to Chelsea by LeeS
[Today at 07:02:05 PM]


Villa Park Redevelopment by Percy McCarthy
[Today at 06:57:17 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Watkins, Ings, both or neither?  (Read 63884 times)

Online Legion

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 60343
  • Age: 55
  • Location: With my son
  • Oh, it must be! And it is! Villa in the lead!
    • Personal Education Services
Watkins, Ings, both or neither?
« on: November 20, 2021, 07:07:35 PM »
What would you do?
« Last Edit: July 23, 2022, 03:52:49 PM by Legion »

Online Legion

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 60343
  • Age: 55
  • Location: With my son
  • Oh, it must be! And it is! Villa in the lead!
    • Personal Education Services
Re: Watkins, Ings or both?
« Reply #1 on: November 20, 2021, 07:13:32 PM »
Watkins for me with Ings and Archer on the bench.

Offline Sexual Ealing

  • Member
  • Posts: 26557
  • Location: Salop
Re: Watkins, Ings or both?
« Reply #2 on: November 20, 2021, 07:18:09 PM »
Ings looks like a panic buy all day long. Good player, but not what we needed.

Offline sickbeggar

  • Member
  • Posts: 7781
  • Location: Universities are full of people educated beyond their intelligence
Re: Watkins, Ings or both?
« Reply #3 on: November 20, 2021, 07:19:17 PM »
Watkins for me with Ings and Archer on the bench.

Yep, same. Can't have 2 guys playing badly together every week. Watkins for now on merit.

Online Rudy Can't Fail

  • Member
  • Posts: 43527
  • Location: In the Shade
    • http://www.heroespredictions.co.uk/pl/
Re: Watkins, Ings or both?
« Reply #4 on: November 20, 2021, 07:19:44 PM »
Panic buy? He was one of the top PL strikers last season.

Offline Sexual Ealing

  • Member
  • Posts: 26557
  • Location: Salop
Re: Watkins, Ings or both?
« Reply #5 on: November 20, 2021, 07:20:37 PM »
Panic buy? He was one of the top PL strikers last season.

He isn't this season.

Online London Villan

  • Member
  • Posts: 11518
  • Location: Brum
  • GM : 01.10.2025
Re: Watkins, Ings or both?
« Reply #6 on: November 20, 2021, 07:22:16 PM »
Maybe not a panic buy, but clearly not right for our system, or fitting the profile of players we normally spend big on.

Online Rudy Can't Fail

  • Member
  • Posts: 43527
  • Location: In the Shade
    • http://www.heroespredictions.co.uk/pl/
Re: Watkins, Ings or both?
« Reply #7 on: November 20, 2021, 07:23:09 PM »
Panic buy? He was one of the top PL strikers last season.

He isn't this season.

Neither is Ollie. We needed back up, we brought in better than we could have dreamed, nobody forced Dean to play them together.

Offline Sexual Ealing

  • Member
  • Posts: 26557
  • Location: Salop
Re: Watkins, Ings or both?
« Reply #8 on: November 20, 2021, 07:24:39 PM »
Panic buy? He was one of the top PL strikers last season.

He isn't this season.

Neither is Ollie. We needed back up, we brought in better than we could have dreamed, nobody forced Dean to play them together.

He's too good to be a backup for us. As is Ollie.

Offline Beard82

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5931
  • Age: 44
  • Location: Suffolk
  • GM : 18.01.2027
Re: Watkins, Ings or both?
« Reply #9 on: November 20, 2021, 07:25:27 PM »
Ings looks like a panic buy all day long. Good player, but not what we needed.
The ings money should have been added onto JWP's bid and we would have a much better squad - certainly in the highsight of how promising Archer looks

Offline N'ZMAV

  • Member
  • Posts: 10866
  • Location: Kidderminster
Re: Watkins, Ings or both?
« Reply #10 on: November 20, 2021, 07:26:22 PM »
we need two good strikers - Watkins suits our play better as we don't give Ings enough service

Online LeeB

  • Member
  • Posts: 37618
  • Location: Standing in the Klix-O-Gum queue.
  • GM : May, 2014
Re: Watkins, Ings or both?
« Reply #11 on: November 20, 2021, 07:29:35 PM »
Watkins all day long and twice on Tuesdays.

Online SamTheMouse

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12750
  • Location: The Land of the Fragrant Founders of Human Rights, Fine Wines & Bikinis
  • GM : 29.09.2026
Re: Watkins, Ings or both?
« Reply #12 on: November 20, 2021, 07:31:18 PM »
Buying Ings was fine, as long as it was on the understanding that he would be competing with Watkins for a place in the starting lineup.

It's the effort to crowbar both into the team that makes it look like a panic buy.

richtheholtender

  • Guest
Re: Watkins, Ings or both?
« Reply #13 on: November 20, 2021, 07:38:09 PM »
For us to be a competitive side we need to have quality in all areas and in numbers. They both want to be the best they can be for a side that's competing so it's select one and go with it and it's up to that one to stay in the side and it's up to the other one to get in. Personally  I'd go with ollie but he does need to select one and go with it. The other will have to wait.

Malandro

  • Guest
Re: Watkins, Ings or both?
« Reply #14 on: November 20, 2021, 07:39:47 PM »
Watkins.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal