collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Ollie Watkins by Smithy
[Today at 02:21:15 PM]


Europa League 2025-26 by olaftab
[Today at 02:20:44 PM]


Youri Tielemans by Somniloquism
[Today at 02:09:41 PM]


Aston Villa v Lille Post-Match Thread by TheToffnar
[Today at 01:56:11 PM]


Standard of Refereeing by Exeter 77
[Today at 01:47:15 PM]


Jadon Sancho (loan) by Brazilian Villain
[Today at 01:43:35 PM]


John McGinn by Brazilian Villain
[Today at 01:41:59 PM]


GUESS THE CROWD R22: ASTON VILLA v West Ham, Sunday 22nd March! by littleoldme
[Today at 01:11:17 PM]

Recent Posts

Re: Ollie Watkins by Smithy
[Today at 02:21:15 PM]


Re: Europa League 2025-26 by olaftab
[Today at 02:20:44 PM]


Re: Europa League 2025-26 by cdbearsfan
[Today at 02:18:26 PM]


Re: Europa League 2025-26 by brontebilly
[Today at 02:16:59 PM]


Re: Europa League 2025-26 by olaftab
[Today at 02:14:17 PM]


Re: Youri Tielemans by Somniloquism
[Today at 02:09:41 PM]


Re: Ollie Watkins by Dave
[Today at 02:05:13 PM]


Re: Ollie Watkins by eamonn
[Today at 02:04:01 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Watkins, Ings, both or neither?  (Read 59623 times)

Offline Legion

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 60112
  • Age: 55
  • Location: With my son
  • Oh, it must be! And it is! Villa in the lead!
    • Personal Education Services
Watkins, Ings, both or neither?
« on: November 20, 2021, 07:07:35 PM »
What would you do?
« Last Edit: July 23, 2022, 03:52:49 PM by Legion »

Offline Legion

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 60112
  • Age: 55
  • Location: With my son
  • Oh, it must be! And it is! Villa in the lead!
    • Personal Education Services
Re: Watkins, Ings or both?
« Reply #1 on: November 20, 2021, 07:13:32 PM »
Watkins for me with Ings and Archer on the bench.

Online Sexual Ealing

  • Member
  • Posts: 25325
  • Location: Salop
Re: Watkins, Ings or both?
« Reply #2 on: November 20, 2021, 07:18:09 PM »
Ings looks like a panic buy all day long. Good player, but not what we needed.

Offline sickbeggar

  • Member
  • Posts: 7781
  • Location: Universities are full of people educated beyond their intelligence
Re: Watkins, Ings or both?
« Reply #3 on: November 20, 2021, 07:19:17 PM »
Watkins for me with Ings and Archer on the bench.

Yep, same. Can't have 2 guys playing badly together every week. Watkins for now on merit.

Online Rudy Can't Fail

  • Member
  • Posts: 42661
  • Location: In the Shade
    • http://www.heroespredictions.co.uk/pl/
Re: Watkins, Ings or both?
« Reply #4 on: November 20, 2021, 07:19:44 PM »
Panic buy? He was one of the top PL strikers last season.

Online Sexual Ealing

  • Member
  • Posts: 25325
  • Location: Salop
Re: Watkins, Ings or both?
« Reply #5 on: November 20, 2021, 07:20:37 PM »
Panic buy? He was one of the top PL strikers last season.

He isn't this season.

Online London Villan

  • Member
  • Posts: 11406
  • Location: Brum
  • GM : 01.10.2025
Re: Watkins, Ings or both?
« Reply #6 on: November 20, 2021, 07:22:16 PM »
Maybe not a panic buy, but clearly not right for our system, or fitting the profile of players we normally spend big on.

Online Rudy Can't Fail

  • Member
  • Posts: 42661
  • Location: In the Shade
    • http://www.heroespredictions.co.uk/pl/
Re: Watkins, Ings or both?
« Reply #7 on: November 20, 2021, 07:23:09 PM »
Panic buy? He was one of the top PL strikers last season.

He isn't this season.

Neither is Ollie. We needed back up, we brought in better than we could have dreamed, nobody forced Dean to play them together.

Online Sexual Ealing

  • Member
  • Posts: 25325
  • Location: Salop
Re: Watkins, Ings or both?
« Reply #8 on: November 20, 2021, 07:24:39 PM »
Panic buy? He was one of the top PL strikers last season.

He isn't this season.

Neither is Ollie. We needed back up, we brought in better than we could have dreamed, nobody forced Dean to play them together.

He's too good to be a backup for us. As is Ollie.

Offline Beard82

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5566
  • Age: 44
  • Location: Suffolk
  • GM : 18.01.2027
Re: Watkins, Ings or both?
« Reply #9 on: November 20, 2021, 07:25:27 PM »
Ings looks like a panic buy all day long. Good player, but not what we needed.
The ings money should have been added onto JWP's bid and we would have a much better squad - certainly in the highsight of how promising Archer looks

Offline N'ZMAV

  • Member
  • Posts: 10649
  • Location: Kidderminster
Re: Watkins, Ings or both?
« Reply #10 on: November 20, 2021, 07:26:22 PM »
we need two good strikers - Watkins suits our play better as we don't give Ings enough service

Offline LeeB

  • Member
  • Posts: 36673
  • Location: Standing in the Klix-O-Gum queue.
  • GM : May, 2014
Re: Watkins, Ings or both?
« Reply #11 on: November 20, 2021, 07:29:35 PM »
Watkins all day long and twice on Tuesdays.

Online SamTheMouse

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12063
  • Location: The Land of the Fragrant Founders of Human Rights, Fine Wines & Bikinis
  • GM : 29.09.2026
Re: Watkins, Ings or both?
« Reply #12 on: November 20, 2021, 07:31:18 PM »
Buying Ings was fine, as long as it was on the understanding that he would be competing with Watkins for a place in the starting lineup.

It's the effort to crowbar both into the team that makes it look like a panic buy.

richtheholtender

  • Guest
Re: Watkins, Ings or both?
« Reply #13 on: November 20, 2021, 07:38:09 PM »
For us to be a competitive side we need to have quality in all areas and in numbers. They both want to be the best they can be for a side that's competing so it's select one and go with it and it's up to that one to stay in the side and it's up to the other one to get in. Personally  I'd go with ollie but he does need to select one and go with it. The other will have to wait.

Malandro

  • Guest
Re: Watkins, Ings or both?
« Reply #14 on: November 20, 2021, 07:39:47 PM »
Watkins.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal