collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Recent Posts

Follow us on...

« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 28   Go Down

Author Topic: Watkins, Ings, both or neither?  (Read 44620 times)

Online Legion

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 58318
  • Age: 53
  • Location: With my son
  • Oh, it must be! And it is! Villa in the lead!
    • Personal Education Services
  • GM : 05.04.2019
Watkins, Ings, both or neither?
« on: November 20, 2021, 07:07:35 PM »
What would you do?
« Last Edit: July 23, 2022, 03:52:49 PM by Legion »
Logged

Online Legion

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 58318
  • Age: 53
  • Location: With my son
  • Oh, it must be! And it is! Villa in the lead!
    • Personal Education Services
  • GM : 05.04.2019
Re: Watkins, Ings or both?
« Reply #1 on: November 20, 2021, 07:13:32 PM »
Watkins for me with Ings and Archer on the bench.
Logged

Offline Sexual Ealing

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 19054
  • Location: Bulgaria
  • GM : PCM
Re: Watkins, Ings or both?
« Reply #2 on: November 20, 2021, 07:18:09 PM »
Ings looks like a panic buy all day long. Good player, but not what we needed.
Logged

Offline sickbeggar

  • Member
  • Posts: 7781
  • Location: Universities are full of people educated beyond their intelligence
Re: Watkins, Ings or both?
« Reply #3 on: November 20, 2021, 07:19:17 PM »
Quote from: Legion on November 20, 2021, 07:13:32 PM
Watkins for me with Ings and Archer on the bench.

Yep, same. Can't have 2 guys playing badly together every week. Watkins for now on merit.
Logged

Offline Rudy Can't Fail

  • Member
  • Posts: 39052
  • Location: In the Shade
    • http://www.heroespredictions.co.uk/pl/
Re: Watkins, Ings or both?
« Reply #4 on: November 20, 2021, 07:19:44 PM »
Panic buy? He was one of the top PL strikers last season.
Logged

Offline Sexual Ealing

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 19054
  • Location: Bulgaria
  • GM : PCM
Re: Watkins, Ings or both?
« Reply #5 on: November 20, 2021, 07:20:37 PM »
Quote from: Rudy Can't Fail on November 20, 2021, 07:19:44 PM
Panic buy? He was one of the top PL strikers last season.

He isn't this season.
Logged

Online London Villan

  • Member
  • Posts: 9561
  • Location: Brum
  • GM : 27.05.2019
Re: Watkins, Ings or both?
« Reply #6 on: November 20, 2021, 07:22:16 PM »
Maybe not a panic buy, but clearly not right for our system, or fitting the profile of players we normally spend big on.
Logged

Offline Rudy Can't Fail

  • Member
  • Posts: 39052
  • Location: In the Shade
    • http://www.heroespredictions.co.uk/pl/
Re: Watkins, Ings or both?
« Reply #7 on: November 20, 2021, 07:23:09 PM »
Quote from: Sexual Ealing on November 20, 2021, 07:20:37 PM
Quote from: Rudy Can't Fail on November 20, 2021, 07:19:44 PM
Panic buy? He was one of the top PL strikers last season.

He isn't this season.

Neither is Ollie. We needed back up, we brought in better than we could have dreamed, nobody forced Dean to play them together.
Logged

Offline Sexual Ealing

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 19054
  • Location: Bulgaria
  • GM : PCM
Re: Watkins, Ings or both?
« Reply #8 on: November 20, 2021, 07:24:39 PM »
Quote from: Rudy Can't Fail on November 20, 2021, 07:23:09 PM
Quote from: Sexual Ealing on November 20, 2021, 07:20:37 PM
Quote from: Rudy Can't Fail on November 20, 2021, 07:19:44 PM
Panic buy? He was one of the top PL strikers last season.

He isn't this season.

Neither is Ollie. We needed back up, we brought in better than we could have dreamed, nobody forced Dean to play them together.

He's too good to be a backup for us. As is Ollie.
Logged

Offline Beard82

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3160
  • Age: 42
  • Location: Suffolk
  • GM : 06.12.2024
Re: Watkins, Ings or both?
« Reply #9 on: November 20, 2021, 07:25:27 PM »
Quote from: Sexual Ealing on November 20, 2021, 07:18:09 PM
Ings looks like a panic buy all day long. Good player, but not what we needed.
The ings money should have been added onto JWP's bid and we would have a much better squad - certainly in the highsight of how promising Archer looks
Logged

Offline N'ZMAV

  • Member
  • Posts: 9656
  • Location: Peckham
Re: Watkins, Ings or both?
« Reply #10 on: November 20, 2021, 07:26:22 PM »
we need two good strikers - Watkins suits our play better as we don't give Ings enough service
Logged

Online LeeB

  • Member
  • Posts: 31375
  • Location: Standing in the Klix-O-Gum queue.
  • GM : May, 2014
Re: Watkins, Ings or both?
« Reply #11 on: November 20, 2021, 07:29:35 PM »
Watkins all day long and twice on Tuesdays.
Logged

Offline SamTheMouse

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 9824
  • Location: The Land of the Fragrant Founders of Human Rights, Fine Wines & Bikinis
  • GM : 03.11.2024
Re: Watkins, Ings or both?
« Reply #12 on: November 20, 2021, 07:31:18 PM »
Buying Ings was fine, as long as it was on the understanding that he would be competing with Watkins for a place in the starting lineup.

It's the effort to crowbar both into the team that makes it look like a panic buy.
Logged

richtheholtender

  • Guest
Re: Watkins, Ings or both?
« Reply #13 on: November 20, 2021, 07:38:09 PM »
For us to be a competitive side we need to have quality in all areas and in numbers. They both want to be the best they can be for a side that's competing so it's select one and go with it and it's up to that one to stay in the side and it's up to the other one to get in. Personally  I'd go with ollie but he does need to select one and go with it. The other will have to wait.
Logged

Online TheMalandro

  • Member
  • Posts: 13489
  • GM : 06.03.2016
Re: Watkins, Ings or both?
« Reply #14 on: November 20, 2021, 07:39:47 PM »
Watkins.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 28   Go Up
« previous next »
 

SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal