Its a bit pointless having a option as we know they wont take it after they see how crap he is. But if it means he going means we can get someone else in this window its a no brainer
I’ll always remember this:
Quote from: Percy McCarthy on August 18, 2025, 07:27:48 PMI’ll always remember this:Ha ha ha, have you forgotten it already?
What's the obsession nowadays to have left footed wingers on the right side and right footed the other??Means all they want to do is cut inside and if/when they do get to the byline the cross is inevitably crap because it's on the weaker foot.This drives me mad.
Cheers Leon for this season https://x.com/avfcstatto/status/1957503812597383302?s=46
Shouldn't a loan fee equate to at least a quarter of a typical permanent contract ie 4 years? So if Roma sign him on a permanent deal next summer for £20m, 1 year of prime Bailey should be £5m instead of the £2m we're getting for 25/26. I presume we're prioritising his wages coming off our books. Seems mad that we paid Chelsea £11m for a one year loan for Barkley in 2020/21.
Quote from: eamonn on August 19, 2025, 01:34:05 PMShouldn't a loan fee equate to at least a quarter of a typical permanent contract ie 4 years? So if Roma sign him on a permanent deal next summer for £20m, 1 year of prime Bailey should be £5m instead of the £2m we're getting for 25/26. I presume we're prioritising his wages coming off our books. Seems mad that we paid Chelsea £11m for a one year loan for Barkley in 2020/21.There was a good explanation of this on one of the villa podcasts today. Bailey's value gets recalculated at the point he signed a new contract - essentially the initial £30m minus whatever was amortised by that point. Rough approximation it was about £10m left on book value at that point - which then amortises over the duration of the new contract. So essentially the loan fee pretty much covers a year of his new value, with the prospect of a sale being mostly profit if that option is taken up.