collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Recent Posts

Re: Other Games 2025-26 by eamonn
[Today at 08:47:47 PM]


Re: Other Games 2025-26 by Pete3206
[Today at 08:33:35 PM]


Re: Other Games 2025-26 by astonvilla82
[Today at 08:33:06 PM]


Re: FFP by Chris Harte
[Today at 08:28:49 PM]


Re: Other Games 2025-26 by brontebilly
[Today at 08:27:51 PM]


Re: The NFL Thread (with added College Football) by ADVILLAFAN
[Today at 08:26:52 PM]


Re: FFP by PeterWithesShin
[Today at 08:26:15 PM]


Re: The sacred colours around the world by ADVILLAFAN
[Today at 08:25:16 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: FFP  (Read 654773 times)

Offline dcdavecollett

  • Member
  • Posts: 3939
Re: FFP
« Reply #6195 on: February 15, 2026, 02:05:33 AM »
...or even just a bit of wiggle room.

Offline tomd2103

  • Member
  • Posts: 15872
Re: FFP
« Reply #6196 on: February 15, 2026, 09:58:40 AM »
I asked this before, but if UEFAs financial rules are so restrictive, at what point does it become theoretically not worth playing in their competitons and focusing on the domestic ones? 

Offline LeeB

  • Member
  • Posts: 36567
  • Location: Standing in the Klix-O-Gum queue.
  • GM : May, 2014
Re: FFP
« Reply #6197 on: February 15, 2026, 10:16:27 AM »
I asked this before, but if UEFAs financial rules are so restrictive, at what point does it become theoretically not worth playing in their competitons and focusing on the domestic ones? 

Never.

Offline Percy McCarthy

  • Member
  • Posts: 37001
  • Location: I'm hiding in my hole
    • King City Online
Re: FFP
« Reply #6198 on: February 15, 2026, 10:56:08 AM »
I asked this before, but if UEFAs financial rules are so restrictive, at what point does it become theoretically not worth playing in their competitons and focusing on the domestic ones?

The PL rules are the same (or just about to be). The only difference is we’ll be able to spend 85% of our revenue on wages if we’re not in Europe, against 70% if we are.

There may be different rules on what counts as allowable revenue however. If so, I think that needs to change. One set of rules please.

Offline frank black

  • Member
  • Posts: 3803
Re: FFP
« Reply #6199 on: February 15, 2026, 11:28:09 AM »
I asked this before, but if UEFAs financial rules are so restrictive, at what point does it become theoretically not worth playing in their competitons and focusing on the domestic ones?

The PL rules are the same (or just about to be). The only difference is we’ll be able to spend 85% of our revenue on wages if we’re not in Europe, against 70% if we are.

There may be different rules on what counts as allowable revenue however. If so, I think that needs to change. One set of rules please.

Brilliant isn’t it, you can spend more in wages to try and qualify for European football. Then when you do, you have to sell a player or two and bring the squad cost down, becoming less competitive in the process… “Stay in your lane!”

Offline Percy McCarthy

  • Member
  • Posts: 37001
  • Location: I'm hiding in my hole
    • King City Online
Re: FFP
« Reply #6200 on: February 15, 2026, 11:37:08 AM »
I asked this before, but if UEFAs financial rules are so restrictive, at what point does it become theoretically not worth playing in their competitons and focusing on the domestic ones?

The PL rules are the same (or just about to be). The only difference is we’ll be able to spend 85% of our revenue on wages if we’re not in Europe, against 70% if we are.

There may be different rules on what counts as allowable revenue however. If so, I think that needs to change. One set of rules please.

Brilliant isn’t it, you can spend more in wages to try and qualify for European football. Then when you do, you have to sell a player or two and bring the squad cost down, becoming less competitive in the process… “Stay in your lane!”

Well, it could be argued that if you qualify for Europe increased revenue should mean that 85% becomes 70% without cutting back.

Offline frank black

  • Member
  • Posts: 3803
Re: FFP
« Reply #6201 on: February 15, 2026, 11:58:11 AM »
I asked this before, but if UEFAs financial rules are so restrictive, at what point does it become theoretically not worth playing in their competitons and focusing on the domestic ones?

The PL rules are the same (or just about to be). The only difference is we’ll be able to spend 85% of our revenue on wages if we’re not in Europe, against 70% if we are.

There may be different rules on what counts as allowable revenue however. If so, I think that needs to change. One set of rules please.

Brilliant isn’t it, you can spend more in wages to try and qualify for European football. Then when you do, you have to sell a player or two and bring the squad cost down, becoming less competitive in the process… “Stay in your lane!”

Well, it could be argued that if you qualify for Europe increased revenue should mean that 85% becomes 70% without cutting back.

Definitely with Champions league football, probably not so for the lesser contests. All this, whilst balancing improving player contracts, paying bonuses and trying to improve squad depth. Ensuring you have an appropriate off ramp to the likelihood of only spending one season in Europe.

Online AV82EC

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 13157
  • Location: Macclesfield
  • GM : 29.09.2026
Re: FFP
« Reply #6202 on: February 15, 2026, 12:10:19 PM »
The trouble as I see it is we’ve obviously been hit with the sudden transition from PSR to SCR. In many ways it’s our own fault for misjudging it but just as we’d pretty much sorted our domestic PL PSR position, SCR comes at us and means the increased spending in Wages we’d done to compete domestically and qualify for the CL meant we were then non compliant with UEFA SCR. It seems slightly unfair to me that clubs who do transition quickly to the CL like ourselves aren’t at least given some transition allowance to get your house in order? Anyway as long as we keep up the commercial grind, we’ll get there. If we qualify for the CL then hopefully we can find a front of shirt sponsor to give us at least £35-£40m per season to get us into that sort of keeping up with the Joneses territory.

Offline aj2k77

  • Member
  • Posts: 12278
Re: FFP
« Reply #6203 on: February 15, 2026, 12:25:25 PM »
What's galling is were not even being allowed to keep up with the Joneses, on transfer fees and agents we've been outspent by the vast majority of the division. It's only on wages where we are near competitive and even then we're miles behind the SKY 6. Emery has just done a fantastic job and in a way the continuity has benefited us to a degree to a point but we are getting to the phase now where we need fresh blood and to replace players getting past their peaks.

Offline tomd2103

  • Member
  • Posts: 15872
Re: FFP
« Reply #6204 on: February 15, 2026, 12:35:32 PM »
The trouble as I see it is we’ve obviously been hit with the sudden transition from PSR to SCR. In many ways it’s our own fault for misjudging it but just as we’d pretty much sorted our domestic PL PSR position, SCR comes at us and means the increased spending in Wages we’d done to compete domestically and qualify for the CL meant we were then non compliant with UEFA SCR. It seems slightly unfair to me that clubs who do transition quickly to the CL like ourselves aren’t at least given some transition allowance to get your house in order? Anyway as long as we keep up the commercial grind, we’ll get there. If we qualify for the CL then hopefully we can find a front of shirt sponsor to give us at least £35-£40m per season to get us into that sort of keeping up with the Joneses territory.

Agree, but being so heavily reliant on being in the Champions League isn't sustainable.  I suppose when you look at the teams in other countries currently above us in the money league, then they are in it pretty much every year due to the strength of their leagues.  What I find telling is that some of the English clubs are in there without being in it.

Offline Percy McCarthy

  • Member
  • Posts: 37001
  • Location: I'm hiding in my hole
    • King City Online
Re: FFP
« Reply #6205 on: February 15, 2026, 01:05:39 PM »
The trouble as I see it is we’ve obviously been hit with the sudden transition from PSR to SCR. In many ways it’s our own fault for misjudging it but just as we’d pretty much sorted our domestic PL PSR position, SCR comes at us and means the increased spending in Wages we’d done to compete domestically and qualify for the CL meant we were then non compliant with UEFA SCR.

Good point. Also, having to comply with two sets of rules at the same time is/was a conundrum for us. It meant that Ramsey, for instance, was a great sale for domestic PSR because of the pure profit element, but a good one to keep under SCR because he was a (relatively) low earner.

Offline Percy McCarthy

  • Member
  • Posts: 37001
  • Location: I'm hiding in my hole
    • King City Online
Re: FFP
« Reply #6206 on: Today at 07:32:24 PM »
Another club looking for sponsors:

Sources have blamed several reasons as to why the sponsor will walk away from #Tottenham at the end of the season:

❌ A 17th-placed finish in the league was deemed unacceptable.
❌ The club have failed to present a clear roadmap or reassurances of how they plan to improve domestic performances and results.
❌ Inability to sign the best players.
❌ Clients have been left unimpressed by the number of empty seats inside the Tottenham stadium for big games and the anger of fans.
❌Many sponsors have been dismayed by the lack of communication from the very top of the club since Levy’s departure, with many yet to be introduced to Vinai and the Lewis family.

Online Sexual Ealing

  • Member
  • Posts: 25040
  • Location: Salop
Re: FFP
« Reply #6207 on: Today at 07:38:15 PM »
We could have theirs.

Offline Chris Harte

  • Member
  • Posts: 12691
Re: FFP
« Reply #6208 on: Today at 07:47:33 PM »
What are AIA? Finance?

Offline Percy McCarthy

  • Member
  • Posts: 37001
  • Location: I'm hiding in my hole
    • King City Online
Re: FFP
« Reply #6209 on: Today at 08:22:12 PM »
What are AIA? Finance?

Think so, not sure. The particular sponsor is not named though.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal