collapse collapse

* - On Sale NOW -

Claret Blue and Green

The story of Aston Villa’s Irish connection

£9.99 plus postage

For ROW Postage please email iotp@heroespublishing.net

Postal Location

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Villa Park Redevelopment  (Read 1599301 times)

Offline Hopadop

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4735
  • Location: North London
  • GM : 25.10.2026
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #12945 on: May 23, 2026, 11:31:38 AM »
so off potato head for a minute,  is the Trinity capacity increasing next season ?

You mean The Steve Bruce Stand?

Offline PeterWithesShin

  • Member
  • Posts: 82933
  • GM : 17.03.2015
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #12946 on: May 23, 2026, 11:40:26 AM »
Cabbage Stand

Offline Skipper_The_Eyechild

  • Member
  • Posts: 1490
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #12947 on: May 23, 2026, 06:24:03 PM »
Remember how eyeball-bleedingly shit the football was to watch?

It was absolutely as bad as McLeish days, utter garbage. Bruce - like McLeish - both came across as decent types, but their idea of 'tactics' was to slap the lads on the back and egg them on as they ran out, then hope for the best.

I remember having had enough of the football after about 6 months. I turned to a mate and said 'I have no idea what we're trying to do'. I probably shouldn't have thought about it too much, I don't think he did.

Offline eamonn

  • Member
  • Posts: 36634
  • Location: Stay in sight of the mainland
  • GM : 26.07.2020
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #12948 on: May 23, 2026, 06:46:31 PM »
Di Matteo's win rate was 8% or something daft. Extrapolate that over a season and you're going down.

We kept conceding late equalisers. That would have turned round. Robbie won the CL as a manager, Arsenal have never done that.

Offline Toronto Villa

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 61186
  • Age: 53
  • Location: Toronto, Canada
  • GM : 23.07.2026
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #12949 on: May 23, 2026, 08:11:25 PM »
What Bruce said on TS was fine until he put David Moyes in the same managerial category as Unai. Twat.

Offline TonyD

  • Member
  • Posts: 11069
  • Location: Outside the box
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #12950 on: May 23, 2026, 08:12:04 PM »
Let’s keep the topic on thread.
Bruce was less of a chancer than carpet head. 

Offline Skipper_The_Eyechild

  • Member
  • Posts: 1490
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #12951 on: Today at 02:13:40 AM »
I mean, that's just whataboutery. I doubt anyone would argue otherwise.

Online Rory

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 11179
  • GM : PCM
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #12952 on: Today at 03:00:53 AM »
I don't care what anybody says, Bruce did stabilise us.

Yes, only as a Playoff-chasing Championship team, but that's better than what went before!

As others have said, we were in freefall.

Nobody knew how well Deano would do. Nobody knew that within a decade we'd be winning a major trophy and qualifying for the Champions League.

But a modicum of respect is owed, because another appointment like Lambert, Garde, Di Matteo and we wouldn't be where we are now.

Offline cdbearsfan

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 79186
  • Location: Yardley Massive
  • I still hate Bono.
  • GM : 03.02.2027
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #12953 on: Today at 06:59:08 AM »
Yes.

Online FatSam

  • Member
  • Posts: 1606
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #12954 on: Today at 07:38:56 AM »
Bruce was certainly a better appointment for where we were than Di Matteo. I’d be surprised if anyone who was at Reading away would think he should be disrespected with a cabbage statue. His signings were predominantly positive, not scattergun. He was dealing with the mess created by Di Matteo and Xia.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal