Specifically on light, the consultation deals with it more from the light pollution sense, but reaffirms they remain a consideration. Legally the position would be unchanged as those houses are >20 years old. The best option, if a new design would block that light, remains to purchase the 7 or 8 that it impacts. Or negotiate a settlement. In the context of a new build at £100m+ then a few extra million is not problematic.
Did anybody ever go on the monorail at Merry Hill? I have a really vague and distant childhood memory of it.
Quote from: Ads on Today at 10:30:25 AMDid anybody ever go on the monorail at Merry Hill? I have a really vague and distant childhood memory of it.I did a few times, didn’t see Leonard Nimoy though.A metro to VP would be great but the cost of building it in this country per mile is ridiculous. I can’t see anymore metro on same scale being built in the Brum/ Black Country area after the eastside extension and the Dudley route. Leeds looks to have their metro indefinitely cancelled.Cov is using a cheaper / lighter version which may be a goer for VP.
Quote from: DB on Today at 10:43:32 AMQuote from: Ads on Today at 10:30:25 AMDid anybody ever go on the monorail at Merry Hill? I have a really vague and distant childhood memory of it.I did a few times, didn’t see Leonard Nimoy though.A metro to VP would be great but the cost of building it in this country per mile is ridiculous. I can’t see anymore metro on same scale being built in the Brum/ Black Country area after the eastside extension and the Dudley route. Leeds looks to have their metro indefinitely cancelled.Cov is using a cheaper / lighter version which may be a goer for VP.The issue with the Coventry VLR is the capacity of the vehicles. In such a dense urban environment my biggest concern is it just isn’t going to have the capacity that say the West Mids Metro already has. It’s cheap to build but at what cost. Anyway back on topic, VP and the Alexander Stadium absolutely need a metro extension. I’ve said it before as well that I’m really underwhelmed with what they’re doing to Witton Station as well.
What an utter waste of money. Low capacity, slow and probably about 10% as effective as either buses or trams. The only surprise is we haven’t done it here as that’s the usual standard of public transport provision.
Quote from: Ads on December 17, 2025, 12:52:55 PMSpecifically on light, the consultation deals with it more from the light pollution sense, but reaffirms they remain a consideration. Legally the position would be unchanged as those houses are >20 years old. The best option, if a new design would block that light, remains to purchase the 7 or 8 that it impacts. Or negotiate a settlement. In the context of a new build at £100m+ then a few extra million is not problematic. If we did want to do something with Witton Lane would it only be that few houses ?
Quote from: AV82EC on Today at 09:49:45 AMWhat an utter waste of money. Low capacity, slow and probably about 10% as effective as either buses or trams. The only surprise is we haven’t done it here as that’s the usual standard of public transport provision. We have the Emirates cable car, linking Greenwich to Victoria Dock, I was walking underneath it yesterday and every carriage looked completely empty. Boris Johnson’s £60m vanity project.