collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Ollie Watkins by Sexual Ealing
[Today at 08:53:05 PM]


Spurs v Aston Villa Post-Match Thread by Ian.
[Today at 08:50:37 PM]


Unai Emery by Sexual Ealing
[Today at 08:49:06 PM]


Boubacar Kamara by Brazilian Villain
[Today at 08:48:05 PM]


GUESS THE GOAL R16: FAC Spurs v ASTON VILLA Saturday 10th January!!🥅 by Louzie0
[Today at 08:40:43 PM]


Villa Park Redevelopment by Tuscans
[Today at 08:39:19 PM]


Brian Green by saunders_heroes
[Today at 08:36:00 PM]


Standard of Refereeing by Legion
[Today at 08:27:46 PM]

Recent Posts

Re: Ollie Watkins by Sexual Ealing
[Today at 08:53:05 PM]


Re: Spurs v Aston Villa Post-Match Thread by Ian.
[Today at 08:50:37 PM]


Re: Unai Emery by Sexual Ealing
[Today at 08:49:06 PM]


Re: Boubacar Kamara by Brazilian Villain
[Today at 08:48:05 PM]


Re: Spurs v Aston Villa Post-Match Thread by adrenachrome
[Today at 08:47:54 PM]


Re: Spurs v Aston Villa Post-Match Thread by simboy
[Today at 08:45:37 PM]


Re: Boubacar Kamara by caster troy
[Today at 08:44:04 PM]


Re: Boubacar Kamara by usav
[Today at 08:42:26 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Villa Park Redevelopment  (Read 1368872 times)

Offline chrisw1

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 10186
  • GM : 21.08.2026
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #11025 on: August 28, 2025, 11:58:27 AM »
The Holte could be improved, but the cost-benefit is a non-starter.

We had one opportunity to rebuild a stand unfettered by land constraints, but have chosen to extend it instead.  If we had any serious ambitions to maximise capacity, we'd be building something equivalent to the Anfield Road stand, which would have added an extra 4-5k more than the current plan.

Getting up to 55k with that one stand would have made a hell of a difference.  As it is, we'll be topping out at 50k + whatever any further 'bowl optimisation' adds for the next decade at least.
« Last Edit: August 28, 2025, 12:00:28 PM by chrisw1 »

Online Brazilian Villain

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 53500
  • GM : 25.07.2026
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #11026 on: August 28, 2025, 12:24:25 PM »
North Stand plans have been approved by BCC. https://x.com/villareport/status/1961024665037533515

Offline rob_bridge

  • Member
  • Posts: 10180
  • Age: 53
  • Location: Shirleyshire
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #11027 on: August 28, 2025, 01:31:53 PM »
North Stand plans have been approved by BCC. https://x.com/villareport/status/1961024665037533515

Seems to have been forever  but good news.

Offline chrisw1

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 10186
  • GM : 21.08.2026
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #11028 on: August 28, 2025, 01:42:33 PM »
Bearing in mind we had approval for a bigger development, this must have been a simple box tick.

Online pauliewalnuts

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 75309
  • GM : 22.10.2026
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #11029 on: August 28, 2025, 02:04:47 PM »
Bearing in mind we had approval for a bigger development, this must have been a simple box tick.

That’s not how it works. The size of the previous application makes no difference.

Offline Ads

  • Member
  • Posts: 43835
  • Location: Your Li+Na+P Intravenous Drip
  • GM : 17.04.2024
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #11030 on: August 28, 2025, 02:05:03 PM »
Bearing in mind we had approval for a bigger development, this must have been a simple box tick.

This is correct; the new design was already inside the planning envelope so always a formality as you say.

Offline chrisw1

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 10186
  • GM : 21.08.2026
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #11031 on: August 28, 2025, 02:11:58 PM »
Bearing in mind we had approval for a bigger development, this must have been a simple box tick.

That’s not how it works. The size of the previous application makes no difference.
Of course it does.  As ADS has said they had previously approved something larger both physically and capacity.  They were hardly going to be able to find a reason to turn this one down.

Offline cdbearsfan

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 76077
  • Location: Yardley Massive
  • I still hate Bono.
  • GM : 03.02.2026
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #11032 on: August 28, 2025, 02:48:37 PM »
West Midlands Mayor Richard Parker: "Huge congrats to Aston Villa. The good news doesn't stop there. We've got funding to upgrade Witton Station and we're working closely with the club and our rail partners to make sure fans get the great train arrival they deserve."

Online AV82EC

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12965
  • Location: Macclesfield
  • GM : 29.09.2026
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #11033 on: August 28, 2025, 02:53:35 PM »
West Midlands Mayor Richard Parker: "Huge congrats to Aston Villa. The good news doesn't stop there. We've got funding to upgrade Witton Station and we're working closely with the club and our rail partners to make sure fans get the great train arrival they deserve."

<Brian Blessed voice> PARKERS ALIVE </Brian Blessed voice>

Online FatSam

  • Member
  • Posts: 1536
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #11034 on: August 28, 2025, 05:04:56 PM »
Bearing in mind we had approval for a bigger development, this must have been a simple box tick.

That’s not how it works. The size of the previous application makes no difference.
It does in as much as all of the principles of the development had already been established by the previous consent. So, provided that policies haven’t changed, and the new proposals are less impactful than the previously consented ones (which you would assume is the case for a smaller capacity), then there shouldn’t be any reason for refusal.

Online kippaxvilla2

  • Member
  • Posts: 29608
  • Location: Hatfield - the nice part of Donny.
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #11035 on: August 28, 2025, 05:33:24 PM »
Only 49,000?

Offline Percy McCarthy

  • Member
  • Posts: 36667
  • Location: I'm hiding in my hole
    • King City Online
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #11036 on: August 28, 2025, 05:33:25 PM »

Offline Percy McCarthy

  • Member
  • Posts: 36667
  • Location: I'm hiding in my hole
    • King City Online
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #11037 on: August 28, 2025, 05:34:41 PM »
Only 49,000?

No. Increase in capacity in other stands as well.

Offline Crown Hill

  • Member
  • Posts: 625
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #11038 on: August 28, 2025, 05:36:40 PM »
Supposedly could reach 52k through incremental change which won’t require planning permission.

Online N'ZMAV

  • Member
  • Posts: 10479
  • Location: Kidderminster
Re: Villa Park Redevelopment
« Reply #11039 on: August 28, 2025, 05:39:51 PM »
Yeah, Anfield is hideous. And I have to admit, the ‘famous’ atmosphere has rarely been present whenever I’ve been there.
it’s decent for the last 2 minutes before the kick off. Then it’s as dead as a dodo.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal