collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Aston Villa 2 Chelsea 2 Post Match Heart Massage. by Skerra
[Today at 11:28:45 PM]


Other Games - 2023/24 by David_Nab
[Today at 11:20:28 PM]


Douglas Luiz - Confirmed confirmed by PaulWinch again
[Today at 11:19:47 PM]


Moussa Diaby - Confirmed by Axl Rose
[Today at 11:15:52 PM]


Loanwatch 2023/24 by AV84
[Today at 11:09:51 PM]


MOTD by PeterWithe
[Today at 11:07:30 PM]


Summer 2024 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by Steve67
[Today at 10:58:00 PM]


Robin Olsen by Somniloquism
[Today at 10:54:37 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Premier League reform proposals  (Read 34739 times)

Offline Clive W

  • Member
  • Posts: 367
Re: Premier League reform proposals
« Reply #45 on: October 11, 2020, 07:07:53 PM »
From the DT

“ Each of the nine clubs who, at any time of determination, have been members of the Premier League continuously for more seasons than other clubs will be considered a ‘Long-Term Shareholder’.”

Key word is “continuously” which is why the 9 consists of the big six (sorry chaps  but it saves typing) plus Southampton,Everton and WHU

We’re excluded because of our 2 years in the wilderness

Offline Ads

  • Member
  • Posts: 39684
  • Location: The Breeze
  • GM : 17.04.2024
Re: Premier League reform proposals
« Reply #46 on: October 11, 2020, 07:10:05 PM »
If Man United and Liverpool want to become some sort of Masonic Lodge, then they can fuck off and form their own.

Online Behind Bluenose Lines

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2409
  • Location: Hanging on in Quiet Desperation During a Global Pandemic
  • GM : 28.06.2024
Re: Premier League reform proposals
« Reply #47 on: October 11, 2020, 07:11:33 PM »
From the DT

“ Each of the nine clubs who, at any time of determination, have been members of the Premier League continuously for more seasons than other clubs will be considered a ‘Long-Term Shareholder’.”

Key word is “continuously” which is why the 9 consists of the big six (sorry chaps  but it saves typing) plus Southampton,Everton and WHU

We’re excluded because of our 2 years in the wilderness
3 years!  I can't see our owners taking this lying down somehow!

Offline Ad@m

  • Member
  • Posts: 12563
  • GM : 23.03.2023
Re: Premier League reform proposals
« Reply #48 on: October 11, 2020, 07:14:35 PM »
This special status bollocks is just an attempt to bribe a few extra teams to back their plan.

It's so blatant. If this passes it means that the 'Big 6' run the league. They can push through any rule change they want. That's why they're so willing to bribe the Football League and a handful of other Premier League clubs, hoping that covid has made them so desperate they can't turn the offer down.

Online danno

  • Member
  • Posts: 3055
  • Location: Super Tamworth
Re: Premier League reform proposals
« Reply #49 on: October 11, 2020, 07:19:46 PM »
Southampton Everton and West Ham must know that only needing six votes from nine to pass a motion is not good news for them.

Offline N'ZMAV

  • Member
  • Posts: 9666
  • Location: Peckham
Re: Premier League reform proposals
« Reply #50 on: October 11, 2020, 07:22:31 PM »
is this a big 6 where 1 one them has never even won the Premier League and the other have won it the same amount of times as Leicester and Blackburn?

Right.

Can't see any of this happening.


richtheholtender

  • Guest
Re: Premier League reform proposals
« Reply #51 on: October 11, 2020, 07:23:59 PM »
What about special status for a club who formed league football from the start?

Offline Clive W

  • Member
  • Posts: 367
Re: Premier League reform proposals
« Reply #52 on: October 11, 2020, 07:24:16 PM »
Interesting that the FA has the “golden share” in the PL which allows them to veto anything

So if this goes through we could have a situation where the 9 “pleb” clubs (including us) vote on a proposal, which gets vetoed by the super 9 only for the FA to veto the veto


Offline N'ZMAV

  • Member
  • Posts: 9666
  • Location: Peckham
Re: Premier League reform proposals
« Reply #53 on: October 11, 2020, 07:25:34 PM »
all sounds like a waste of money - especially when small clubs are crying out for funding or they'll be disappearing forever.

Offline robleflaneur

  • Member
  • Posts: 812
Re: Premier League reform proposals
« Reply #54 on: October 11, 2020, 07:27:23 PM »
Southampton Everton and West Ham must know that only needing six votes from nine to pass a motion is not good news for them.
And with fewer Prem.teams,WHU and Soton could easily be relegated and lose that wonderful 'special status'.

Offline Clive W

  • Member
  • Posts: 367
Re: Premier League reform proposals
« Reply #55 on: October 11, 2020, 07:31:04 PM »
There’s a very comprehensive summary of the plan in the DT. Some huge financial implications

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2020/10/11/project-big-picture-key-proposals-premier-league-over-haul-revealed/

Offline Richard E

  • Member
  • Posts: 13141
  • Age: 53
  • Location: Tipton
  • This also will pass.
  • GM : 28.02.2019
Re: Premier League reform proposals
« Reply #56 on: October 11, 2020, 08:07:13 PM »
My response to this proposal consists of two words, the latter of which is ‘off.’

Offline stevo_st

  • Member
  • Posts: 1407
  • Location: On the cusp of glory
  • GM : 27.07.21
Re: Premier League reform proposals
« Reply #57 on: October 11, 2020, 08:13:18 PM »
Liverpool really did taking a 7-2 thumping badly didn’t they

Offline ChicagoLion

  • Member
  • Posts: 22387
  • Location: Chicago
  • Literally
Re: Premier League reform proposals
« Reply #58 on: October 11, 2020, 08:22:41 PM »
it was inevitable that the crisis would cause a significant shake up, this is stage 1.
more to come

Offline PeterWithesShin

  • Member
  • Posts: 68529
  • GM : 17.03.2015
Re: Premier League reform proposals
« Reply #59 on: October 11, 2020, 08:23:13 PM »
So 6 clubs will have near control over the other 14

Quote
Each of the nine clubs who, at any time of determination, have been members of the Premier League continuously for more seasons than other clubs will be considered a ‘Long-Term Shareholder’.

Two-thirds of the long-term shareholders can cause to be adopted without approval from the other clubs:

i) the election or removal of the CEO and/or a member of the board;

ii) amendments to cost control rules and regulations;

iii) contracts for the sale of league broadcasting and media rights

Two-thirds of the long-term shareholders can prevent from being adopted resolutions to:

i) change the distribution rights of the sponsorship, commercial and broadcasting rights sold

centrally;

ii) change the distribution to clubs from other PL centralised rights or assets

c) alter in a material way the nature of the competition

Two-thirds of the long-term shareholders can veto the Premier League board’s approval of a proposed new owner.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal