Quote from: Holte132 on September 01, 2025, 07:24:16 PMWhat do you think about this? "Martinez would also have cost United twice as much as Lammens and would have demanded wages in the region of £200,000-a-week. Against that backdrop, and with United needing to spend cautiously to comply with PSR rules having already spent more than £200m this this summer, Lammens was considered the best option."It seems a reasonable stance, but they would have known that a while ago. So did it anyway to try and fuck us over on the transfer fee. Maybe .And that’s not the worst thing they’ve done to us today. Shitehouses.
What do you think about this? "Martinez would also have cost United twice as much as Lammens and would have demanded wages in the region of £200,000-a-week. Against that backdrop, and with United needing to spend cautiously to comply with PSR rules having already spent more than £200m this this summer, Lammens was considered the best option."
If anyone needed any further proof that internet Villa and real Villa are two totally different things, watch the reaction at our next match.
We’ll accept him back - frankly after watching Bizot under most crosses last night I’m relieved. I think Bizot is a good back-up keeper but that’s it.
They don’t seem to be spending cautiously, more like Viv Nicholson at Christmas.
I will passive aggressively not sing the world number one song.
Quote from: dave.woodhall on September 01, 2025, 07:29:31 PMIf anyone needed any further proof that internet Villa and real Villa are two totally different things, watch the reaction at our next match.Will 100% get clapped at the next game. Which I think is wrong.
Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.
Author
Topic: Emi Martinez (Read 961819 times)
