Ollie Watkins

[Smirker]

16 goals in 40 games is not a "poor return" for a top division striker

And you think the same about 17 in 54?

No. If I did, I'd have said "16 goals in 40 games and 17 goals in 54 games is not a "poor return" for a top division striker".

But I didn't say that.

So the "over the course of a season he's never had a poor goal return" was wrong and I was right when I criticised his goalscoring then.

And yes I'm aware you didn't post that.

We agree then.

17 in 54 - poor.

[cdbearsfan]

You've got him cornered, now! That will be the last we see of Smirker on this thread, you mark my words.

[Smirker]

Can we stop this? One guy has a (wilfully) eccentric view of the stats, everyone else disagrees. We're not discussing Watkins anymore.

I'm OK with dropping it but as you saw it wasn't me that brought it up.

If I'm not brought into it again I won't bring it up.

Sounds fair to me.

 

[Monty]

Can we stop this? One guy has a (wilfully) eccentric view of the stats, everyone else disagrees. We're not discussing Watkins anymore.

I'm OK with dropping it but as you saw it wasn't me that brought it up.

If I'm not brought into it again I won't bring it up.

Sounds fair to me.

 

I'd say just rise above it mate. You've explained your point in, I would say, exquisite detail, and if people don't agree with you by now I'd say now is the time we all shook hands and went back to our wives, who've been waiting by the desert this whole time, having a drink.