collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Ollie Watkins by LeonW
[Today at 03:29:35 PM]


The International Cricket Thread by paul_e
[Today at 03:28:15 PM]


Wolves vs Aston Villa Pre-Match Thread by dorsetvillian
[Today at 03:25:29 PM]


Injury updates by Flamingo Lane
[Today at 02:59:50 PM]


GUESS THE GOAL R20: Wolves v VILLA Friday 27Th February 🥅 by simon ward 50
[Today at 02:59:33 PM]


Will we qualify for the CL? by Pat Mustard
[Today at 02:04:52 PM]


Kits 25/26 by Brazilian Villain
[Today at 01:54:31 PM]


Aston Villa 1-1 Leeds Post match grumble by Ads
[Today at 11:39:13 AM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Ollie Watkins  (Read 1137358 times)

Online LeonW

  • Member
  • Posts: 2267
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #10920 on: Today at 07:24:12 AM »
I find the Watkins debate quite odd at times. Some people are just adamant that he’s trash and others that he’s totally beyond reproach and we should never try to replace him because it’s not possible with where we are as a club. It’s a bit perplexing.

Watkins is and has been a good striker who works hard and has given us great service. Plus he seems like a nice chap. But he’s never been truly clinical, doesn’t really sniff out goals and it looks as though physically (where he really had and gave the side an edge) he’s on the decline.

He’s been largely poor for a long period of time now and whilst some will make the argument that we’ve had results this season with him in the side even if he’s not hitting the mark of a couple of seasons ago, it’s also arguable that we might have done even more with him performing better. We’ve largely got where we are this season without a fully functioning main striker.

And before we have those jumping up to say name an alternative we could get, name them
now! just look at Brentford, a club without our resources and pull: Hogan to Watkins to Toney to Mbeumo to Wissa to Thiago. That’s one club alone that manage and bank the profit. If we’re saying that we can’t manage it then we may as well give up now.

Offline ChicagoLion

  • Member
  • Posts: 27809
  • Location: Chicago
  • Literally
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #10921 on: Today at 07:32:31 AM »
That’s a very sensible post LeonW

Online Neil Hawkes

  • Member
  • Posts: 2718
  • Age: 62
  • Location: Cyprus
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #10922 on: Today at 02:25:06 PM »
Taken from LeonW:
Watkins is and has been a good striker who works hard and has given us great service. Plus he seems like a nice chap. But he’s never been truly clinical, doesn’t really sniff out goals and it looks as though physically (where he really had and gave the side an edge) he’s on the decline.

I am of the opinion that because he is such a nice chap, this is impacting his decline as he does not partake of the dirty niggly stuff that a plethora of strikers have fallen back on over the years to mask their fading energy and precision.

Online LeonW

  • Member
  • Posts: 2267
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #10923 on: Today at 03:29:35 PM »
Taken from LeonW:
Watkins is and has been a good striker who works hard and has given us great service. Plus he seems like a nice chap. But he’s never been truly clinical, doesn’t really sniff out goals and it looks as though physically (where he really had and gave the side an edge) he’s on the decline.

I am of the opinion that because he is such a nice chap, this is impacting his decline as he does not partake of the dirty niggly stuff that a plethora of strikers have fallen back on over the years to mask their fading energy and precision.

I don’t think him probably being a decent bloke nice is necessarily anything to do with his abilities if that’s what you’re trying to get at. Gianfranco Zola is universally a decent guys and he was just a bit good.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal