collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Brighton vs Aston Villa Match Thread by kippaxvilla2
[Today at 08:10:17 PM]


Ollie Watkins by cdbearsfan
[Today at 08:08:37 PM]


Will we win the Premier League by Brazilian Villain
[Today at 08:06:44 PM]


International Rugby by cdbearsfan
[Today at 08:01:14 PM]


Other Games 2025-26 by Brazilian Villain
[Today at 07:41:21 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Ollie Watkins  (Read 1023211 times)

Online JUAN PABLO

  • Member
  • Posts: 34988
  • Location: hinckley
    • http://www.scifimafia.net
  • GM : Aug, 2014
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #9585 on: Today at 12:04:34 PM »
So he would never have been sold in summer as he wouldnt have passed a medical .

Online PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 56422
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #9586 on: Today at 12:04:56 PM »
Yeah, this assumption Malen is a wide player when he's not.

No, but he’s not a lone forward either. At least in the context of how we want to play.
« Last Edit: Today at 12:50:19 PM by PaulWinch again »

Online Rudy Can't Fail

  • Member
  • Posts: 41863
  • Location: In the Shade
    • http://www.heroespredictions.co.uk/pl/
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #9587 on: Today at 12:38:29 PM »
Emery has said he wanted to find out exactly what Malen's best position was. I think he's good but not great. Watkins gives us far more energy and work rate, and defending from the front. Which is what Emery likes. If we can find a way to play then as complementary strikers that would be ideal, and Guessand strikes me as a back up for Malen.

We have a very narrow team and are in need of some width z we just don't have any players who are natural wingers with pace.

Disagree on Malen's workrate, he really does everything Watkins does. Big credit to Watkins if he's been playing with an injury though it's absolutely shit news on several levels. I hope he takes something from Unai not only protecting him yesterday in his press conference but going out of his way, something I don't think he's done previously with any player, to really sing his praises.

Right now it would be insane to drop Malen but I still believe he can work together with Watkins. It would mean dropping to a 4-2-2 -2 with no 10 and as you point out we're already narrow as it is. Both Digne and Maatsen are capable of providing the width on the left and deliver but on the right Cash refuses to cross the ball, forever passing it back to McGinn.

That formation may see an abrupt end to us scoring worldies from outside the box which may please one or two who prefer the more industrial 6 yard scramble that suits Watkins more than anyone. Ideally Unai could find away to mix it up but it would mean drawing up a completely new plan. Before he rips up the blueprint I'd hope our coaching team can sit Watkins down and show him one of the reasons he's not scoring, his positioning. For me it's his greatest asset, something so few strikers naturally have but this season it's like he completely forgot and is going to the places where the ball is least likely to arrive.

It may be instruction but it seriously needs to be reviewed as it's clearly not working. Over to you, Unai.


Online usav

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 16247
  • Location: Pittsburgh, PA.
  • GM : 27.05.26
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #9588 on: Today at 01:19:18 PM »
So he would never have been sold in summer as he wouldnt have passed a medical .

Meanwhile, he should have spent the summer getting it fixed.

Offline Drummond

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 34620
  • Location: Everywhere, and nowhere.
  • GM : 17.10.2026
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #9589 on: Today at 02:42:04 PM »
Emery has said he wanted to find out exactly what Malen's best position was. I think he's good but not great. Watkins gives us far more energy and work rate, and defending from the front. Which is what Emery likes. If we can find a way to play then as complementary strikers that would be ideal, and Guessand strikes me as a back up for Malen.

We have a very narrow team and are in need of some width z we just don't have any players who are natural wingers with pace.

Disagree on Malen's workrate, he really does everything Watkins does. Big credit to Watkins if he's been playing with an injury though it's absolutely shit news on several levels. I hope he takes something from Unai not only protecting him yesterday in his press conference but going out of his way, something I don't think he's done previously with any player, to really sing his praises.

Right now it would be insane to drop Malen but I still believe he can work together with Watkins. It would mean dropping to a 4-2-2 -2 with no 10 and as you point out we're already narrow as it is. Both Digne and Maatsen are capable of providing the width on the left and deliver but on the right Cash refuses to cross the ball, forever passing it back to McGinn.

That formation may see an abrupt end to us scoring worldies from outside the box which may please one or two who prefer the more industrial 6 yard scramble that suits Watkins more than anyone. Ideally Unai could find away to mix it up but it would mean drawing up a completely new plan. Before he rips up the blueprint I'd hope our coaching team can sit Watkins down and show him one of the reasons he's not scoring, his positioning. For me it's his greatest asset, something so few strikers naturally have but this season it's like he completely forgot and is going to the places where the ball is least likely to arrive.

It may be instruction but it seriously needs to be reviewed as it's clearly not working. Over to you, Unai.

I don't think Malen works as hard defensively, not at the speed Watkins does at any rate. Offensively there's no question.

Re the positioning I tend to agree, and Unai has to work out where he wants Watkins to be, because it feels like he's been marked out of games.

Online Rudy Can't Fail

  • Member
  • Posts: 41863
  • Location: In the Shade
    • http://www.heroespredictions.co.uk/pl/
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #9590 on: Today at 03:12:13 PM »
Re the positioning I tend to agree, and Unai has to work out where he wants Watkins to be, because it feels like he's been marked out of games.

I can't speak more highly of his one real world class talent, his ability over the years to be in the right place at the right time. Now for some reason when the ball comes in from the left, he's marking the back post, same from the right. Occasionally he'll drop back to the penalty spot, basically he's missing all the action. He's never been clinical but even when he missed a few sitters you'd still expect him to score in a game, such was his availability to score.  It just doesn't make sense.

Offline Percy McCarthy

  • Member
  • Posts: 36373
  • Location: I'm hiding in my hole
    • King City Online
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #9591 on: Today at 03:13:04 PM »
Yeah, this assumption Malen is a wide player when he's not.

It’s a strange one. Don’t know where they got that from.

Offline Drummond

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 34620
  • Location: Everywhere, and nowhere.
  • GM : 17.10.2026
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #9592 on: Today at 03:24:57 PM »
Re the positioning I tend to agree, and Unai has to work out where he wants Watkins to be, because it feels like he's been marked out of games.

I can't speak more highly of his one real world class talent, his ability over the years to be in the right place at the right time. Now for some reason when the ball comes in from the left, he's marking the back post, same from the right. Occasionally he'll drop back to the penalty spot, basically he's missing all the action. He's never been clinical but even when he missed a few sitters you'd still expect him to score in a game, such was his availability to score.  It just doesn't make sense.

I think opponents are just working him out and he and Emery aren't working out a different way. But we are approaching the box differently, and opponents are able to see the game in front of them more easily I think. Plus we seem to be getting slower in our approach,

Online Smirker

  • Member
  • Posts: 7652
  • Location: Birmingham
  • GM : Sep, 2014
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #9593 on: Today at 06:30:02 PM »
Tielemans played with an injury all last season and won player of the year.
Tielemans doesn’t rely on physicality and pace to place his game. He’s got guile, has players around him to do the footwork and can play a killer pass at will. It’s two totally different scenarios.

Fair enough, but I was addressing the point that I thought somebody made about it being bullshit that players play with injuries.

For a few games, fine.

Not for a year when he hasn't been playing well and then choosing not to sign a striker.

Online Smirker

  • Member
  • Posts: 7652
  • Location: Birmingham
  • GM : Sep, 2014
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #9594 on: Today at 06:32:51 PM »
Well it looks like he basically has one good season in his career to date, and whilst I appreciate stats are not everything, there’s little to suggest he’s going to be a prolific goal scorer. I hope he will be, but if we’ve banked on him becoming a good centre forward I would say it’s a bit of a punt.

Could be describing Watkins here.

Online PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 56422
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #9595 on: Today at 06:35:57 PM »
That’s a beyond idiotic comparison, which I think you know.

Online Ian.

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 16267
  • Location: Back home in the Shire
  • GM : 09.01.2026
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #9596 on: Today at 06:46:02 PM »
Tielemans played with an injury all last season and won player of the year.
Tielemans doesn’t rely on physicality and pace to place his game. He’s got guile, has players around him to do the footwork and can play a killer pass at will. It’s two totally different scenarios.

Fair enough, but I was addressing the point that I thought somebody made about it being bullshit that players play with injuries.

For a few games, fine.

Not for a year when he hasn't been playing well and then choosing not to sign a striker.

I guess this is something you should be shouting about in the Emery thread?

Online Ian.

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 16267
  • Location: Back home in the Shire
  • GM : 09.01.2026
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #9597 on: Today at 06:47:10 PM »
This reminds me of last season and the Mings debate over Torres with banned member Tim not very nice but Dim.


Online German James

  • Member
  • Posts: 6597
  • Location: 438.5 miles away
    • The Limpets
  • GM : 13.02.2025
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #9598 on: Today at 07:24:56 PM »
Tielemans played with an injury all last season and won player of the year.
Tielemans doesn’t rely on physicality and pace to place his game. He’s got guile, has players around him to do the footwork and can play a killer pass at will. It’s two totally different scenarios.

Fair enough, but I was addressing the point that I thought somebody made about it being bullshit that players play with injuries.

For a few games, fine.

Not for a year when he hasn't been playing well and then choosing not to sign a striker.

I guess this is something you should be shouting about in the Emery thread?
Except no-one knows if it's true.

Offline PeterWithesShin

  • Member
  • Posts: 78495
  • GM : 17.03.2015
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #9599 on: Today at 07:26:14 PM »
Does anyone really believe that Tuchel and Unai are lying?

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal