collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Aston Villa vs Newcastle pre-match thread by darren woolley
[Today at 08:06:44 AM]


Evann Guessand by darren woolley
[Today at 08:05:32 AM]


Pre season 2025 by LeeB
[Today at 07:51:06 AM]


Leander Dendoncker - on loan to Anderlecht by algy
[Today at 07:47:02 AM]


Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by PaulWinch again
[Today at 07:15:46 AM]


23 April 1975 by dcdavecollett
[Today at 01:17:02 AM]


FFP by Somniloquism
[August 05, 2025, 10:38:10 PM]


Other Games 2025-26 by Somniloquism
[August 05, 2025, 10:32:01 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Ollie Watkins  (Read 872242 times)

Offline Smirker

  • Member
  • Posts: 7139
  • Location: Birmingham
  • GM : Sep, 2014
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #6930 on: January 29, 2025, 11:00:29 PM »
Two assists and a goal but a dreadful display of finishing. Don't care if people don't like hearing it.

We won, finished in the top 8 of the group and Ollie played a massive part in the result, don't care if people don't like hearing it.

That must mean criticism is banned then.

Peter Withe could have hit it a bit cleaner.

Not the same. That's one finish, I'm talking about a habit. It's a massive flaw in is game regardless of the ones he does score.

but he does score plenty. Part of the problem now is that any chance he doesn't take is a sitter than anyone in the world should score according to a bunch of people which means nothing else he does will ever be good enough and it's fucking exhausting seeing so many people slagging off a guy who's well on his way to being our top scorer for the 5th season in a row in a period where we've gone from finishing 17th before he arrived to being in the last 16 of the champions league.

He missed five sitters.

Offline AV84

  • Member
  • Posts: 7782
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #6931 on: January 29, 2025, 11:03:04 PM »
I still think part of the "problem" this season is that we're not getting as many goals from other players as we did last season. Watkins misses stand out more because, other than Rogers, nobody else is really contributing on that front. Understandable that people expect their striker to score, but his misses definitely become more noticeable when we can't seem to rely on anyone else to add a few.

(Not including Duran in that, because obviously he's scored a few very important goals off the bench, but when he starts I don't really expect him to do much.)

Offline ChicagoLion

  • Member
  • Posts: 26205
  • Location: Chicago
  • Literally
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #6932 on: January 29, 2025, 11:04:48 PM »
He was very good tonight except his finishing. The pitch let him down on the penalty.

Offline Monty

  • Member
  • Posts: 29177
  • Location: pastaland
  • GM : 25.05.2024
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #6933 on: January 29, 2025, 11:04:54 PM »
All I can say is that I don't think he'd be very beloved at Arsenal.

Offline brontebilly

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 11050
  • GM : 23.06.2026
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #6934 on: January 29, 2025, 11:05:17 PM »
When he has too long to think he's incredibly average. That one in the first was a sitter, no need to attempt a chip there. The peno was a horror show, funny looking back as it didn't matter. I know I've forgotten at least one other shocker of a miss tonight. Two poor enough efforts at near post.

Liam Scales was playing league of Ireland football not too long ago and honestly that's his level. The other CB was physically weak and bullied in every duel.

Online Ian.

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 15621
  • Location: Back home in the Shire
  • GM : 09.01.2026
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #6935 on: January 29, 2025, 11:07:10 PM »
He didn’t miss any chances did he? Did any of them miss the target?

Offline pauliewalnuts

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 74474
  • GM : 28.08.2025
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #6936 on: January 29, 2025, 11:07:34 PM »
Well, it's not just about missing the target, is it?

Offline eamonn

  • Member
  • Posts: 33700
  • Location: Stay in sight of the mainland
  • GM : 26.07.2020
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #6937 on: January 29, 2025, 11:07:58 PM »
Not tonight he didn’t. We won 4-2 and he was directly involved in 3.

And missed five sitters.

There werent five sitters. You're expecting him to score every chance he gets when no striker anywhere does that.

Offline Smirker

  • Member
  • Posts: 7139
  • Location: Birmingham
  • GM : Sep, 2014
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #6938 on: January 29, 2025, 11:08:33 PM »
Two assists and a goal but a dreadful display of finishing. Don't care if people don't like hearing it.

We won, finished in the top 8 of the group and Ollie played a massive part in the result, don't care if people don't like hearing it.

That must mean criticism is banned then.

Spread it around a bit though. It’s weird if you only pick on our best striker in a generation after having a part in 3 of our 4 goals.

It isn't a one off, it's nearly every game.

And the past gen has been arguably our worst in our history. Being the best of that bunch isn't saying much.

Offline Tuscans

  • Member
  • Posts: 8056
  • Age: 46
  • Location: Newport, South Wales
  • GM : 08.02.15
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #6939 on: January 29, 2025, 11:08:34 PM »
Two assists and a goal but a dreadful display of finishing. Don't care if people don't like hearing it.

We won, finished in the top 8 of the group and Ollie played a massive part in the result, don't care if people don't like hearing it.

That must mean criticism is banned then.

Peter Withe could have hit it a bit cleaner.

Not the same. That's one finish, I'm talking about a habit. It's a massive flaw in is game regardless of the ones he does score.

but he does score plenty. Part of the problem now is that any chance he doesn't take is a sitter than anyone in the world should score according to a bunch of people which means nothing else he does will ever be good enough and it's fucking exhausting seeing so many people slagging off a guy who's well on his way to being our top scorer for the 5th season in a row in a period where we've gone from finishing 17th before he arrived to being in the last 16 of the champions league.

He missed five sitters.
They weren't sitters. You know there's a bloke in goal trying to stop them yeah?

Online Ian.

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 15621
  • Location: Back home in the Shire
  • GM : 09.01.2026
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #6940 on: January 29, 2025, 11:10:06 PM »
He gets so much unwarranted stick, I really don’t get it? They were not sitters, he’s hit the target and they were saved or cleared off the line. He’s brilliant for us and the best striker we’ve had in a very long time.

Offline paul_e

  • Member
  • Posts: 37144
  • Age: 45
  • GM : July, 2013
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #6941 on: January 29, 2025, 11:10:27 PM »
He missed five sitters.

That's utter bollocks and shows exactly why it's so fucking tiresome having to argue about this so much. He missed a penalty because he slipped and scored 1. Over the entire game he had 4 other chances. No striker in history has ever had a 100% conversion rate, in fact 1 in 5 is considered pretty good. If you look at xG (which remember compares chances to a huge dataset of similar ones and gives a value based on how often they result in a goal) he had 1.83 tonight, .79 of which was the penalty. All of his other chances combined add up to an expected return of 1 goal.

Across his time with us all of these same figures apply, he scores something like 18% of the chances he gets. Which makes him an average finisher, not shit, not brilliant, just bang in the middle.

but instead of focusing on that some of us prefer to look at the fact that he also has a significantly higher than average number of assists and works his fucking tits off making space for other people. He's a huge net positive for us and the fact that we've improved so much as a team since he arrived should show that.

Offline Rudy Can't Fail

  • Member
  • Posts: 41406
  • Location: In the Shade
    • http://www.heroespredictions.co.uk/pl/
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #6942 on: January 29, 2025, 11:11:40 PM »
Is it a joke every time you’re weird about Watkins?

Weird? I think I've made myself clear on Watkins but I'll simplify it for you; he's world class at getting himself into goalscoring positions. It's an art very few strikers have. His problem is he's not the most technically gifted of players, especially for this level which is why he misses so many chances. If he was he'd be playing for Real Madrid.

Offline Smirker

  • Member
  • Posts: 7139
  • Location: Birmingham
  • GM : Sep, 2014
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #6943 on: January 29, 2025, 11:14:12 PM »
He missed five sitters.

That's utter bollocks and shows exactly why it's so fucking tiresome having to argue about this so much. He missed a penalty because he slipped and scored 1. Over the entire game he had 4 other chances. No striker in history has ever had a 100% conversion rate, in fact 1 in 5 is considered pretty good. If you look at xG (which remember compares chances to a huge dataset of similar ones and gives a value based on how often they result in a goal) he had 1.83 tonight, .79 of which was the penalty. All of his other chances combined add up to an expected return of 1 goal.

Across his time with us all of these same figures apply, he scores something like 18% of the chances he gets. Which makes him an average finisher, not shit, not brilliant, just bang in the middle.

but instead of focusing on that some of us prefer to look at the fact that he also has a significantly higher than average number of assists and works his fucking tits off making space for other people. He's a huge net positive for us and the fact that we've improved so much as a team since he arrived should show that.

The context of the chances matters. They were all easy to score and he missed five of them.

Offline paul_e

  • Member
  • Posts: 37144
  • Age: 45
  • GM : July, 2013
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #6944 on: January 29, 2025, 11:19:57 PM »
He missed five sitters.

That's utter bollocks and shows exactly why it's so fucking tiresome having to argue about this so much. He missed a penalty because he slipped and scored 1. Over the entire game he had 4 other chances. No striker in history has ever had a 100% conversion rate, in fact 1 in 5 is considered pretty good. If you look at xG (which remember compares chances to a huge dataset of similar ones and gives a value based on how often they result in a goal) he had 1.83 tonight, .79 of which was the penalty. All of his other chances combined add up to an expected return of 1 goal.

Across his time with us all of these same figures apply, he scores something like 18% of the chances he gets. Which makes him an average finisher, not shit, not brilliant, just bang in the middle.

but instead of focusing on that some of us prefer to look at the fact that he also has a significantly higher than average number of assists and works his fucking tits off making space for other people. He's a huge net positive for us and the fact that we've improved so much as a team since he arrived should show that.

The context of the chances matters. They were all easy to score and he missed five of them.

xG is the context of the chances, that's it's entire fucking purpose. Why are you so determined to moan about him tonight of all fucking nights? It's just fucking weird at this point.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal