Ollie’s been great, but I’d have Foden slightly ahead of him. I’d have Rodri in front of all of the nominees.
Quote from: Toronto Villa on May 18, 2024, 06:07:20 PMQuote from: Sexual Ealing on May 18, 2024, 05:52:26 PMQuote from: Toronto Villa on May 18, 2024, 05:09:56 PMThe thing with Ollie is that propelled a side expected by many to finish in the top 8 at best into the CL. With Foden, as outstanding as he is, he is surrounded by some of the world’s top players. That helps when you are always dominating possession and playing a lot of football in the opponents third of the pitch. What Ollie has done is far more valuable to where we finished versus where Man City could finish. This isn’t me saying Foden doesn’t deserve it. It’s me saying Ollie deserved it more. That's true of all Messi's, Ronaldo's, Zidne's Ballon D'Ors. Who should have got them instead of those players?Let’s no get carried away here. Statistically Ollie has better goals, assists in about the same number of PL games. Foden isn’t remotely any of those players you’ve referenced. Again, I’m not saying he shouldn’t be awarded it. I’m saying Ollie, in my opinion, had a better season compared to Foden and had greater influence on how we ended relative to expectations.I'm not suggesting he's as good as them, but the situation you described (that I bolded), that he's in the best team so he's always attacking, getting to show what he can do, applies to them too. Were there not players in those eras who had big impacts on lesser teams? I'd imagine there were, but nobody pays attention to those players because they're not doing spectacular things in enormous games with global attention being paid. What would your reaction be if Ross Barkley had won it? He's had a significant impact on a terrible team - does he deserve it more?
Quote from: Sexual Ealing on May 18, 2024, 05:52:26 PMQuote from: Toronto Villa on May 18, 2024, 05:09:56 PMThe thing with Ollie is that propelled a side expected by many to finish in the top 8 at best into the CL. With Foden, as outstanding as he is, he is surrounded by some of the world’s top players. That helps when you are always dominating possession and playing a lot of football in the opponents third of the pitch. What Ollie has done is far more valuable to where we finished versus where Man City could finish. This isn’t me saying Foden doesn’t deserve it. It’s me saying Ollie deserved it more. That's true of all Messi's, Ronaldo's, Zidne's Ballon D'Ors. Who should have got them instead of those players?Let’s no get carried away here. Statistically Ollie has better goals, assists in about the same number of PL games. Foden isn’t remotely any of those players you’ve referenced. Again, I’m not saying he shouldn’t be awarded it. I’m saying Ollie, in my opinion, had a better season compared to Foden and had greater influence on how we ended relative to expectations.
Quote from: Toronto Villa on May 18, 2024, 05:09:56 PMThe thing with Ollie is that propelled a side expected by many to finish in the top 8 at best into the CL. With Foden, as outstanding as he is, he is surrounded by some of the world’s top players. That helps when you are always dominating possession and playing a lot of football in the opponents third of the pitch. What Ollie has done is far more valuable to where we finished versus where Man City could finish. This isn’t me saying Foden doesn’t deserve it. It’s me saying Ollie deserved it more. That's true of all Messi's, Ronaldo's, Zidne's Ballon D'Ors. Who should have got them instead of those players?
The thing with Ollie is that propelled a side expected by many to finish in the top 8 at best into the CL. With Foden, as outstanding as he is, he is surrounded by some of the world’s top players. That helps when you are always dominating possession and playing a lot of football in the opponents third of the pitch. What Ollie has done is far more valuable to where we finished versus where Man City could finish. This isn’t me saying Foden doesn’t deserve it. It’s me saying Ollie deserved it more.
He’s brilliant, but his impact wasn’t anything like Watkins’ was for us.
Rodri is the best player in the league.
Man City with and without Rodri this season in all compsW37 D11 L0W5 D0 L4
Quote from: Olneythelonely on May 18, 2024, 06:32:59 PMHe’s brilliant, but his impact wasn’t anything like Watkins’ was for us. Yeah, but why would the people who vote for the award give a shit about that? They're trying to find the best player of the season, not the one who had a great influence on the team we support. Barkley, Palmer, Muniz have all impacted their teams, but those teams have done fuck all. Yes, we finished fourth, which is great for us, but why should a neutral care about it when the fella who's won has won the league for his team (whether they would've won it or not without him), who's a better player, exists?
Quote from: Dave on May 18, 2024, 04:18:58 PMQuote from: PeterWithesShin on May 18, 2024, 03:11:56 PMWhoever wins the league will almost certainly be manager of the year. Emery has by far achieved more than them this season though. And i'd think that if I supported another club.Occasionally you get curve-balls though. Pardew got it for finishing fifth with Newcastle, Pulis won it at Palace and George Burley won it at Ipswich.Hang on a minute. Tiny Penis won manager of the year? Really?Bloody hell.
Quote from: PeterWithesShin on May 18, 2024, 03:11:56 PMWhoever wins the league will almost certainly be manager of the year. Emery has by far achieved more than them this season though. And i'd think that if I supported another club.Occasionally you get curve-balls though. Pardew got it for finishing fifth with Newcastle, Pulis won it at Palace and George Burley won it at Ipswich.
Whoever wins the league will almost certainly be manager of the year. Emery has by far achieved more than them this season though. And i'd think that if I supported another club.
Quote from: Sexual Ealing on May 18, 2024, 06:49:46 PMQuote from: Olneythelonely on May 18, 2024, 06:32:59 PMHe’s brilliant, but his impact wasn’t anything like Watkins’ was for us. Yeah, but why would the people who vote for the award give a shit about that? They're trying to find the best player of the season, not the one who had a great influence on the team we support. Barkley, Palmer, Muniz have all impacted their teams, but those teams have done fuck all. Yes, we finished fourth, which is great for us, but why should a neutral care about it when the fella who's won has won the league for his team (whether they would've won it or not without him), who's a better player, exists?I don't expect them to give a shit about us. I also know what they’re trying to find. I’m just trying to say that it should be about which player’s performance over the season is the bigger achievement. And that influence HAS to be one of the things considered. I agree that those players’ teams have done fuck all. I wouldn’t give any of them player of the season. We have achieved beyond what people expected, largely due to the stats of Watkins (which are better than Foden’s - if we don’t want to consider impact), City won the league less comfortably than they probably should. I don’t think it’s because of a ridiculous conspiracy, I think it’s because the people voting will have been taking much less notice of our games - I mean, a lot of them were discussing why they’d take fucking Toney to Germany ahead of Watkins.