collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

The nearlywases - Bobby Campbell by dcdavecollett
[Today at 01:44:22 AM]


Evann Guessand (Signed) by Olneythelonely
[Today at 01:42:49 AM]


Bears/Pears/Domestic Cricket Thread by tomd2103
[Today at 12:43:53 AM]


23 April 1975 by dcdavecollett
[Today at 12:42:32 AM]


Other Games 2025-26 by Tuscans
[Today at 12:09:14 AM]


Jacob Ramsey by Brend'Watkins
[Today at 12:08:23 AM]


Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by VILLA MOLE
[August 08, 2025, 11:17:47 PM]


Pre season 2025 by steamer
[August 08, 2025, 10:57:10 PM]

Recent Posts

Re: The nearlywases - Bobby Campbell by dcdavecollett
[Today at 01:44:22 AM]


Re: Evann Guessand (Signed) by Olneythelonely
[Today at 01:42:49 AM]


Re: Bears/Pears/Domestic Cricket Thread by tomd2103
[Today at 12:43:53 AM]


Re: 23 April 1975 by dcdavecollett
[Today at 12:42:32 AM]


Re: Other Games 2025-26 by Tuscans
[Today at 12:09:14 AM]


Re: Jacob Ramsey by Brend'Watkins
[Today at 12:08:23 AM]


Re: Jacob Ramsey by Beard82
[August 08, 2025, 11:37:30 PM]


Re: Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by VILLA MOLE
[August 08, 2025, 11:17:47 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Ollie Watkins  (Read 879020 times)

Offline FatSam

  • Member
  • Posts: 1460
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #2505 on: February 26, 2023, 01:00:24 AM »

Offline PaulWinch again

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 54903
  • Location: winchester
  • GM : 25.05.2026
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #2506 on: February 26, 2023, 07:29:21 AM »
The save from Ollie’s header was excellent. Lovely to see Ollie in the goals.

Offline Abbeyfealeavfc

  • Member
  • Posts: 3612
  • GM : 23.03.2023
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #2507 on: February 26, 2023, 09:39:23 AM »
Ollie should have had a definite pen following pickford’s horrendous challenge yesterday who should have been sent off. Dyche has form against us sending players out to challenge our forwards in that manner. Ollie was fortunate, Wesley was not.

Offline Risso

  • Member
  • Posts: 89939
  • Location: Leics
  • GM : 04.03.2025
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #2508 on: February 26, 2023, 09:54:29 AM »
I thought it was a good save and then just a coming together after the ball was gone.

Offline astonvilla82

  • Member
  • Posts: 2943
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #2509 on: February 26, 2023, 11:12:46 AM »
I thought it was a good save and then just a coming together after the ball was gone.
looking like if Pickford is making sure he's taking Watkins out no matter what, that's a foul if not in the penalty by any other players

Offline ChicagoLion

  • Member
  • Posts: 26221
  • Location: Chicago
  • Literally
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #2510 on: February 26, 2023, 11:14:59 AM »
I thought it was a good save and then just a coming together after the ball was gone.
It hits Pickford so leg after contact.

Offline Russ aka Big Nose

  • Member
  • Posts: 1185
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #2511 on: February 26, 2023, 11:24:48 AM »
As I understand the laws of the game, there is no exemption or special treatment of GKs and the laws now are that it is a foul and almost always a booking if a player makes an excessively forceful, out of control tackle on an opponent.

Previously players could claim a touch on the ball, though that no longer counts, i.e., if you touch the ball first and then wipe out an opponent, that is a foul and, probably, a booking.

Obviously most managers and pundits are either ignorant of the change or talk nonsense as it suits their bias.

So that challenge by Pickford should have been a penalty and, probably, a red card. We might not be happy if something like that is given against us, but that is what should happen. UTV

Offline Lastfootstamper

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 11634
  • Age: 59
  • Location: Greater Birmingham
  • GM : PCM
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #2512 on: February 26, 2023, 11:26:27 AM »
Excessively forceful and out of control?

Offline Russ aka Big Nose

  • Member
  • Posts: 1185
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #2513 on: February 26, 2023, 11:32:25 AM »
Interpretation of law 12 (just the relevant section below). The referee has to decide whether a challenge is careless, reckless or reflects excessive force.

Pickford's challenge is either reckless or excessive in my view. What the laws says:

Careless, reckless, using excessive force
“Careless” means that the player has shown a lack of attention or consideration when making a challenge or that he acted without precaution.
• No further disciplinary sanction is needed if a foul is judged to be careless

“Reckless” means that the player has acted with complete disregard to the danger to, or consequences for, his opponent.
• A player who plays in a reckless manner must be cautioned

“Using excessive force” means that the player has far exceeded the necessary use of force and is in danger of injuring his opponent.
• A player who uses excessive force must be sent off

Offline AV82EC

  • Member
  • Posts: 12305
  • Location: Macclesfield
  • GM : 22.02.2024
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #2514 on: February 26, 2023, 11:33:40 AM »
I haven’t analysed it to any great extent but the Pickford one was a pen for me whereas I thought the McGinn one wasn’t! Hey ho we’re back down the road with 3 points I can’t be arsed with worrying about it.

Offline Drummond

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 32872
  • Location: Everywhere, and nowhere.
  • GM : 11.10.2025
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #2515 on: February 26, 2023, 11:36:07 AM »
So now that he's on fire under a new manager.... Are people still of the view we need to upgrade?

Offline Russ aka Big Nose

  • Member
  • Posts: 1185
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #2516 on: February 26, 2023, 11:42:39 AM »
I haven’t analysed it to any great extent but the Pickford one was a pen for me whereas I thought the McGinn one wasn’t! Hey ho we’re back down the road with 3 points I can’t be arsed with worrying about it.
Both for me. The pen on McGinn looks soft, but there is contact, knee on knee, just before the Blue Scouse toes the ball away. UTV

Offline AV82EC

  • Member
  • Posts: 12305
  • Location: Macclesfield
  • GM : 22.02.2024
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #2517 on: February 26, 2023, 11:43:20 AM »
So now that he's on fire under a new manager.... Are people still of the view we need to upgrade?

Maybe. Five in five doesn’t mean much if it’s followed up by only 2 or 3 more up to seasons end. If he can as FV is suggesting get up to mid teens then I’m not so sure he needs replacing and we have Duran and Archer evolving as back ups. What we need in an attacking sense is actually an upgrade for Bailey/Traore and a decision on Coutinho/Buendia for next year and if they “fit” with where Emery wants to go.

Offline Somniloquism

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 32963
  • Location: Back in Brum
  • GM : 06.12.2025
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #2518 on: February 26, 2023, 12:48:20 PM »
I haven’t analysed it to any great extent but the Pickford one was a pen for me whereas I thought the McGinn one wasn’t! Hey ho we’re back down the road with 3 points I can’t be arsed with worrying about it.
Both for me. The pen on McGinn looks soft, but there is contact, knee on knee, just before the Blue Scouse toes the ball away. UTV

He didn’t toe the ball away. MOTD showed that there wasn’t any contact on the ball at all from a 3rd angle. 

Offline PeterWithesShin

  • Member
  • Posts: 75752
  • GM : 17.03.2015
Re: Ollie Watkins
« Reply #2519 on: February 26, 2023, 12:49:13 PM »
They were against us so both were nailed on pens.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal