Quote from: AV82EC on November 02, 2025, 04:40:16 PMHas he got his Mrs up the duff again as that seems to have coincided with a couple of runs of poor form since he’s been here?It's probably the most sane excuse for his current form. There should have been a clause in his last improved contract that he has the snip.
Has he got his Mrs up the duff again as that seems to have coincided with a couple of runs of poor form since he’s been here?
if Watkins was that good, we wouldn't be having that debate, as his performances and stats would shut everyone up. Right?
Quote from: Somniloquism on November 02, 2025, 03:36:14 PMYou just need to look at how much was spent on strikers this season by everyone else and the returns from them to see that when Watkins was at his best, he was irreplaceable. Weird that nobody wanted to spend it on him.
You just need to look at how much was spent on strikers this season by everyone else and the returns from them to see that when Watkins was at his best, he was irreplaceable.
Quote from: Sexual Ealing on November 02, 2025, 03:58:33 PMQuote from: Somniloquism on November 02, 2025, 03:36:14 PMYou just need to look at how much was spent on strikers this season by everyone else and the returns from them to see that when Watkins was at his best, he was irreplaceable. Weird that nobody wanted to spend it on him.Were we selling him or telling them no?
No, I agree fully with that assessment so you can't give me to SE. Watkins was good enough for mid table/top 7. He isn't good enough if we want to go further.
Quote from: Somniloquism on November 02, 2025, 05:30:19 PMQuote from: Sexual Ealing on November 02, 2025, 03:58:33 PMQuote from: Somniloquism on November 02, 2025, 03:36:14 PMYou just need to look at how much was spent on strikers this season by everyone else and the returns from them to see that when Watkins was at his best, he was irreplaceable. Weird that nobody wanted to spend it on him.Were we selling him or telling them no?What do you think?