collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Summer 2025 Transfer Window - hopes, speculation, rumours etc. by DrGonzo
[Today at 04:04:15 PM]


FFP by rougegorge
[Today at 03:51:01 PM]


The International Cricket Thread by Villan For Life
[Today at 03:40:22 PM]


Kits 25/26 by Demitri_C
[Today at 02:08:18 PM]


Europa League 2025-26 by Percy McCarthy
[Today at 12:20:17 PM]

Recent Posts

Follow us on...

Author Topic: NSWE Investment  (Read 894730 times)

Offline cdbearsfan

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 72413
  • Location: Yardley Massive
  • I still hate Bono.
  • GM : 03.02.2026
Re: NSWE Investment
« Reply #4065 on: April 16, 2022, 12:51:07 PM »
No, by all accounts.

Offline pauliewalnuts

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 74465
  • GM : 28.08.2025
Re: NSWE Investment
« Reply #4066 on: April 16, 2022, 03:06:14 PM »
I’d like two things from the new North Stand.

1. The feeling of being as close to the pitch as possible, to create a properly intense atmosphere.
2. Exterior done in quality brick, no cheap cost cutting steel and glass bullshit.

Offline CT Villan

  • Member
  • Posts: 2493
Re: NSWE Investment
« Reply #4067 on: April 16, 2022, 03:21:39 PM »
I like Fred Rinder's plan to get us to 120,000 in 1914...



Online Brazilian Villain

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 47325
  • GM : 25.07.2026
Re: NSWE Investment
« Reply #4068 on: April 16, 2022, 03:44:16 PM »
What about adapting it as a sitting on laps stand?

Sounds like my type of venue.

Offline eamonn

  • Member
  • Posts: 33695
  • Location: Stay in sight of the mainland
  • GM : 26.07.2020
Re: NSWE Investment
« Reply #4069 on: April 16, 2022, 03:45:04 PM »
John Carew, Carew!

Offline Zouch Villa

  • Member
  • Posts: 1037
  • Location: Sententious throbber seeking moral high ground
  • GM : 12.02.2024
Re: NSWE Investment
« Reply #4070 on: April 16, 2022, 05:41:25 PM »
I like Fred Rinder's plan to get us to 120,000 in 1914...




I like the stadium design, but it looks like we were trying to play out from the back even then.

Offline pauliewalnuts

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 74465
  • GM : 28.08.2025
Re: NSWE Investment
« Reply #4071 on: April 16, 2022, 06:36:45 PM »
I like Fred Rinder's plan to get us to 120,000 in 1914...




I like the stadium design, but it looks like we were trying to play out from the back even then.

You can tell by looking at us in that picture, even then we had no idea how to use space.

Offline eamonn

  • Member
  • Posts: 33695
  • Location: Stay in sight of the mainland
  • GM : 26.07.2020
Re: NSWE Investment
« Reply #4072 on: April 16, 2022, 07:06:59 PM »
Magnificent picture all the same.

Offline algy

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 6089
  • Age: 43
  • Location: Gogledd Cymru
  • GM : 26.03.2025
Re: NSWE Investment
« Reply #4073 on: April 16, 2022, 07:17:22 PM »
I like Fred Rinder's plan to get us to 120,000 in 1914...


How big are those ends to have a capacity of 120000? Reckon you're maybe looking at 16000 tops in the Witton Lane + Trinity Road stands, so ... 52k capacity?

Offline Beard82

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4789
  • Age: 43
  • Location: Suffolk
  • GM : 07.12.2025
Re: NSWE Investment
« Reply #4074 on: April 16, 2022, 07:20:42 PM »
I like Fred Rinder's plan to get us to 120,000 in 1914...




I like the stadium design, but it looks like we were trying to play out from the back even then.

You can tell by looking at us in that picture, even then we had no idea how to use space.
Great Picture - we were playing west ham - if you look close enough you can see a young Mark Noble in their midfield

Offline nigel

  • Member
  • Posts: 5753
Re: NSWE Investment
« Reply #4075 on: April 16, 2022, 11:05:31 PM »
I like Fred Rinder's plan to get us to 120,000 in 1914...


How big are those ends to have a capacity of 120000? Reckon you're maybe looking at 16000 tops in the Witton Lane + Trinity Road stands, so ... 52k capacity?

Back then when the Holte was standing I think the original capacity would have been about 35000 (I’ve heard it was more), so increase by half again gives your 52000. Mirror that at the Witton End and there you go

Online dave.woodhall

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 63304
  • Location: Treading water in a sea of retarded sexuality and bad poetry.
Re: NSWE Investment
« Reply #4076 on: April 16, 2022, 11:06:44 PM »
There was also standing in the Trinity & Witton Lane.

Offline robbo1874

  • Member
  • Posts: 3386
  • Location: Bris-vegas
Re: NSWE Investment
« Reply #4077 on: April 17, 2022, 03:59:57 AM »
Maybe a smart, sloping roof that has lots of angled bits to reflect light back onto the surrounding area, or something fancy like that, would be possible.

The problem is that the sun rises over the Trinity, so going higher on the Witton Lane just casts a bigger shadow.

Maybe they could sell the houses at put Blose there instead.
think you’ve got it the wrong way round mate. The sun sets behind the trinity. Geek that I am - I looked at it on Google Earth yesterday. I reckon both footpaths are about 2m wide and the road itself is about 8m wide. If they built out across the road like with the trinity and took a 1m strip of the park for the supporting steel columns, you’d effectively have a 3 storey facade with probably 25-30m separation from the backs of the houses.

If it was built similar to the trinity with the cantilevered roof the facade could probably be a bit lower than the current facade and I reckon you’d probably get an additional 13 rows (~2000) of seating along the whole side of the ground. Whether or not it would stack up cost wise to add 13 extra rows is another matter, though it would also solve the problem of the current stand being cramped and people wanting to leave after 75 minutes because their knees are fkd from scraping the back of the seat in front.

 But my point is that it could probably be done without much impact on the neighbouring houses, in terms of loss of light or overshadowing. To do it I reckon we’d have to knock the whole thing down and start again. I think when the Witton lane was expanded they left the original bottom tier in place.

« Last Edit: April 17, 2022, 04:57:09 AM by robbo1874 »

Offline algy

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 6089
  • Age: 43
  • Location: Gogledd Cymru
  • GM : 26.03.2025
Re: NSWE Investment
« Reply #4078 on: April 17, 2022, 06:52:23 AM »
But my point is that it could probably be done without much impact on the neighbouring houses, in terms of loss of light or overshadowing. To do it I reckon we’d have to knock the whole thing down and start again. I think when the Witton lane was expanded they left the original bottom tier in place.
Wasn't there a reason for that, though? Seem to remember my dad saying it was listed or something like that.

Online VILLA MOLE

  • Member
  • Posts: 7897
  • Age: 50
  • Location: STRATFORD UPON AVON
  • a v f c
Re: NSWE Investment
« Reply #4079 on: April 17, 2022, 07:26:15 AM »
i think originally they left the bottom tier but then had to go back and rebuild it when they built the upper tier .  I seem to remember issues with asbestos ??

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal