Quote from: Sexual Ealing on May 13, 2019, 09:25:46 PMQuote from: Ad@m on May 13, 2019, 09:22:50 PMQuote from: Sexual Ealing on May 13, 2019, 09:06:07 PMQuote from: Ad@m on May 13, 2019, 08:17:48 PMWho knows. If they did it would significantly reduce the price if they ever wanted to sell us so I'd be surprised. Would they not be able to 'buy' it back ahead of such a sale?They would but what would be the point? Plus they'd probably end up with a huge tax bill. I have no idea what I'm talking about, but if they made the stadium an asset of the club again before a sale then would that not reinflate the asking price?It would, but then what would be the point in taking it out of the club in the first place if that was what they were going to do?And the sale back to the club would trigger a tax liability on them which could be avoided if they leave the ground in the club in the first place. [/quoteQuote from: Ad@m on May 13, 2019, 09:27:29 PMQuote from: Sexual Ealing on May 13, 2019, 09:25:46 PMQuote from: Ad@m on May 13, 2019, 09:22:50 PMQuote from: Sexual Ealing on May 13, 2019, 09:06:07 PMQuote from: Ad@m on May 13, 2019, 08:17:48 PMWho knows. If they did it would significantly reduce the price if they ever wanted to sell us so I'd be surprised. Would they not be able to 'buy' it back ahead of such a sale?They would but what would be the point? Plus they'd probably end up with a huge tax bill. I have no idea what I'm talking about, but if they made the stadium an asset of the club again before a sale then would that not reinflate the asking price?It would, but then what would be the point in taking it out of the club in the first place if that was what they were going to do?And the sale back to the club would trigger a tax liability on them which could be avoided if they leave the ground in the club in the first place. FFP if we don't go up?
Quote from: Ad@m on May 13, 2019, 09:22:50 PMQuote from: Sexual Ealing on May 13, 2019, 09:06:07 PMQuote from: Ad@m on May 13, 2019, 08:17:48 PMWho knows. If they did it would significantly reduce the price if they ever wanted to sell us so I'd be surprised. Would they not be able to 'buy' it back ahead of such a sale?They would but what would be the point? Plus they'd probably end up with a huge tax bill. I have no idea what I'm talking about, but if they made the stadium an asset of the club again before a sale then would that not reinflate the asking price?
Quote from: Sexual Ealing on May 13, 2019, 09:06:07 PMQuote from: Ad@m on May 13, 2019, 08:17:48 PMWho knows. If they did it would significantly reduce the price if they ever wanted to sell us so I'd be surprised. Would they not be able to 'buy' it back ahead of such a sale?They would but what would be the point? Plus they'd probably end up with a huge tax bill.
Quote from: Ad@m on May 13, 2019, 08:17:48 PMWho knows. If they did it would significantly reduce the price if they ever wanted to sell us so I'd be surprised. Would they not be able to 'buy' it back ahead of such a sale?
Who knows. If they did it would significantly reduce the price if they ever wanted to sell us so I'd be surprised.
Quote from: Sexual Ealing on May 13, 2019, 09:25:46 PMQuote from: Ad@m on May 13, 2019, 09:22:50 PMQuote from: Sexual Ealing on May 13, 2019, 09:06:07 PMQuote from: Ad@m on May 13, 2019, 08:17:48 PMWho knows. If they did it would significantly reduce the price if they ever wanted to sell us so I'd be surprised. Would they not be able to 'buy' it back ahead of such a sale?They would but what would be the point? Plus they'd probably end up with a huge tax bill. I have no idea what I'm talking about, but if they made the stadium an asset of the club again before a sale then would that not reinflate the asking price?It would, but then what would be the point in taking it out of the club in the first place if that was what they were going to do?And the sale back to the club would trigger a tax liability on them which could be avoided if they leave the ground in the club in the first place.
I'm not angry at you for that quote fail SE, just very disappointed.
A poster with your experience should never be making mistakes like that, SE. The crumpet should be in the left hand! I'd keep you behind after work for extra training.
Quote from: PeterWithesShin on May 13, 2019, 09:58:29 PMI'm not angry at you for that quote fail SE, just very disappointed. I've let myself down, and I'll be disappointed when I see it again. There were mitigating circumstances in that I was using my left hand. I was holding a crumpet in my right hand and I'm all right hand. It's always been my weakness as a poster. It's why I never got the recognition I deserved with a call-up to BTL at the Guardian, or writing into podcasts. I did get an offer once to represent TBAR but my heart wouldn't have been in it. You want to post at the top level really.
You can always spot a robot. The real SE has been to Birmingham enough times and had social intercourse with those of us from the Eternit City never to use the 'C' word. It is a pikelet he would have had in his right hand.Eternit is the trade name for asbestos sheeting.
Quote from: brian green on May 14, 2019, 08:22:09 AMYou can always spot a robot. The real SE has been to Birmingham enough times and had social intercourse with those of us from the Eternit City never to use the 'C' word. It is a pikelet he would have had in his right hand.Eternit is the trade name for asbestos sheeting.Brian - I was just about to post about it being a pikelet too