collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Villa Park Redevelopment by pauliewalnuts
[Today at 11:02:37 PM]


Ex- Villa Players still playing watch by pauliewalnuts
[Today at 10:57:42 PM]


Post match Villa 2 Burnley 1 by Bent Neilsens Screamer
[Today at 10:55:28 PM]


After the Lord Mayor's Show - 1957-58 pt 1 by dave.woodhall
[Today at 10:43:15 PM]


Other Games 2025-26 by cdbearsfan
[Today at 10:38:14 PM]


Emi Martinez by LeonW
[Today at 10:31:07 PM]


Unai Emery by olaftab
[Today at 08:59:20 PM]


Kits 25/26 by eamonn
[Today at 08:18:22 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Boxing thread 2016  (Read 52645 times)

Online dave.woodhall

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 63605
  • Location: Treading water in a sea of retarded sexuality and bad poetry.
Re: Boxing thread 2016
« Reply #75 on: February 27, 2016, 10:49:37 PM »
For pay per view it's been piss poor so far.

You don't need big names, just well-matched fights.

Offline joecrow

  • Member
  • Posts: 277
  • Location: castle bromwich
Re: Boxing thread 2016
« Reply #76 on: February 27, 2016, 10:49:58 PM »
Buffer doesn't look well.
Manchester will do that to you

Offline bertlambshank

  • Member
  • Posts: 11512
  • Location: looking down the barrel of a Smith&Wesson.
  • GM : 30.06.2019
Re: Boxing thread 2016
« Reply #77 on: February 27, 2016, 10:52:31 PM »
He didn't expect that.

Offline bertlambshank

  • Member
  • Posts: 11512
  • Location: looking down the barrel of a Smith&Wesson.
  • GM : 30.06.2019
Re: Boxing thread 2016
« Reply #78 on: February 27, 2016, 10:53:57 PM »
For pay per view it's been piss poor so far.

You don't need big names, just well-matched fights.
Please forward that to Eddie Hearn.

Offline joecrow

  • Member
  • Posts: 277
  • Location: castle bromwich
Re: Boxing thread 2016
« Reply #79 on: February 27, 2016, 11:14:45 PM »
Frampton looking comfortable. Quigg looking nervous.

Offline bertlambshank

  • Member
  • Posts: 11512
  • Location: looking down the barrel of a Smith&Wesson.
  • GM : 30.06.2019
Re: Boxing thread 2016
« Reply #80 on: February 27, 2016, 11:19:26 PM »
Frampton 3 up after 4 for me.

Offline bertlambshank

  • Member
  • Posts: 11512
  • Location: looking down the barrel of a Smith&Wesson.
  • GM : 30.06.2019
Re: Boxing thread 2016
« Reply #81 on: February 27, 2016, 11:23:50 PM »
Make that 4 after 5.

Offline Proposition Joe

  • Member
  • Posts: 4560
  • Location: Munich
Re: Boxing thread 2016
« Reply #82 on: February 27, 2016, 11:25:08 PM »
6 rounds gone, about 5 punches thrown in total.  It's like watching Audley sparring against his reflection.

Offline joecrow

  • Member
  • Posts: 277
  • Location: castle bromwich
Re: Boxing thread 2016
« Reply #83 on: February 27, 2016, 11:27:22 PM »
Frampton up by 5 with 6 gone. Quigg looks lost

Offline bertlambshank

  • Member
  • Posts: 11512
  • Location: looking down the barrel of a Smith&Wesson.
  • GM : 30.06.2019
Re: Boxing thread 2016
« Reply #84 on: February 27, 2016, 11:28:17 PM »
Quigg needs the stoppage already.

Online dave.woodhall

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 63605
  • Location: Treading water in a sea of retarded sexuality and bad poetry.
Re: Boxing thread 2016
« Reply #85 on: February 27, 2016, 11:28:58 PM »
That fucking band.

Offline bertlambshank

  • Member
  • Posts: 11512
  • Location: looking down the barrel of a Smith&Wesson.
  • GM : 30.06.2019
Re: Boxing thread 2016
« Reply #86 on: February 27, 2016, 11:31:17 PM »

Offline peter w

  • Member
  • Posts: 35469
  • Location: Istanbul
Re: Boxing thread 2016
« Reply #87 on: February 27, 2016, 11:32:18 PM »
If Quigg doesn't knock Frampton out I think he's getting too far behind here.

Offline tomd2103

  • Member
  • Posts: 15562
Re: Boxing thread 2016
« Reply #88 on: February 27, 2016, 11:32:56 PM »
Frampton up by 5 with 6 gone. Quigg looks lost

Not sure about that.  I think it could be closer than that.

Offline joecrow

  • Member
  • Posts: 277
  • Location: castle bromwich
Re: Boxing thread 2016
« Reply #89 on: February 27, 2016, 11:39:51 PM »
Certainly closer now

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal