collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

International Rugby by paul_e
[Today at 09:20:25 PM]


Will we qualify for the CL? by Mellin
[Today at 09:13:31 PM]


Other Games 2025-26 by AV82EC
[Today at 09:04:55 PM]


Who would you have back? by dave.woodhall
[Today at 08:52:50 PM]


Manchester Utd vs Aston Villa Pre-Match Thread by AlexAlexCropley
[Today at 07:40:46 PM]


GUESS THE GOAL R22: Man United v ASTON VILLA, Sunday 15th March! by mjlions
[Today at 07:29:30 PM]


John McGinn by Beard82
[Today at 07:23:26 PM]


Cubs/Clarets membership by Duncan Shaw
[Today at 04:42:56 PM]

Recent Posts

Re: International Rugby by paul_e
[Today at 09:20:25 PM]


Re: Will we qualify for the CL? by Mellin
[Today at 09:13:31 PM]


Re: International Rugby by Baldy
[Today at 09:07:24 PM]


Re: International Rugby by Gareth
[Today at 09:05:46 PM]


Re: Other Games 2025-26 by AV82EC
[Today at 09:04:55 PM]


Re: Will we qualify for the CL? by Richard E
[Today at 09:02:23 PM]


Re: International Rugby by paul_e
[Today at 08:59:52 PM]


Re: International Rugby by PaulWinch again
[Today at 08:53:34 PM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Boxing thread 2016  (Read 56075 times)

Online dave.woodhall

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 64283
  • Location: Treading water in a sea of retarded sexuality and bad poetry.
Re: Boxing thread 2016
« Reply #75 on: February 27, 2016, 10:49:37 PM »
For pay per view it's been piss poor so far.

You don't need big names, just well-matched fights.

Offline joecrow

  • Member
  • Posts: 277
  • Location: castle bromwich
Re: Boxing thread 2016
« Reply #76 on: February 27, 2016, 10:49:58 PM »
Buffer doesn't look well.
Manchester will do that to you

Offline bertlambshank

  • Member
  • Posts: 11512
  • Location: looking down the barrel of a Smith&Wesson.
  • GM : 30.06.2019
Re: Boxing thread 2016
« Reply #77 on: February 27, 2016, 10:52:31 PM »
He didn't expect that.

Offline bertlambshank

  • Member
  • Posts: 11512
  • Location: looking down the barrel of a Smith&Wesson.
  • GM : 30.06.2019
Re: Boxing thread 2016
« Reply #78 on: February 27, 2016, 10:53:57 PM »
For pay per view it's been piss poor so far.

You don't need big names, just well-matched fights.
Please forward that to Eddie Hearn.

Offline joecrow

  • Member
  • Posts: 277
  • Location: castle bromwich
Re: Boxing thread 2016
« Reply #79 on: February 27, 2016, 11:14:45 PM »
Frampton looking comfortable. Quigg looking nervous.

Offline bertlambshank

  • Member
  • Posts: 11512
  • Location: looking down the barrel of a Smith&Wesson.
  • GM : 30.06.2019
Re: Boxing thread 2016
« Reply #80 on: February 27, 2016, 11:19:26 PM »
Frampton 3 up after 4 for me.

Offline bertlambshank

  • Member
  • Posts: 11512
  • Location: looking down the barrel of a Smith&Wesson.
  • GM : 30.06.2019
Re: Boxing thread 2016
« Reply #81 on: February 27, 2016, 11:23:50 PM »
Make that 4 after 5.

Offline Proposition Joe

  • Member
  • Posts: 4848
  • Location: Munich
Re: Boxing thread 2016
« Reply #82 on: February 27, 2016, 11:25:08 PM »
6 rounds gone, about 5 punches thrown in total.  It's like watching Audley sparring against his reflection.

Offline joecrow

  • Member
  • Posts: 277
  • Location: castle bromwich
Re: Boxing thread 2016
« Reply #83 on: February 27, 2016, 11:27:22 PM »
Frampton up by 5 with 6 gone. Quigg looks lost

Offline bertlambshank

  • Member
  • Posts: 11512
  • Location: looking down the barrel of a Smith&Wesson.
  • GM : 30.06.2019
Re: Boxing thread 2016
« Reply #84 on: February 27, 2016, 11:28:17 PM »
Quigg needs the stoppage already.

Online dave.woodhall

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 64283
  • Location: Treading water in a sea of retarded sexuality and bad poetry.
Re: Boxing thread 2016
« Reply #85 on: February 27, 2016, 11:28:58 PM »
That fucking band.

Offline bertlambshank

  • Member
  • Posts: 11512
  • Location: looking down the barrel of a Smith&Wesson.
  • GM : 30.06.2019
Re: Boxing thread 2016
« Reply #86 on: February 27, 2016, 11:31:17 PM »

Offline peter w

  • Member
  • Posts: 35469
  • Location: Istanbul
Re: Boxing thread 2016
« Reply #87 on: February 27, 2016, 11:32:18 PM »
If Quigg doesn't knock Frampton out I think he's getting too far behind here.

Offline tomd2103

  • Member
  • Posts: 15931
Re: Boxing thread 2016
« Reply #88 on: February 27, 2016, 11:32:56 PM »
Frampton up by 5 with 6 gone. Quigg looks lost

Not sure about that.  I think it could be closer than that.

Offline joecrow

  • Member
  • Posts: 277
  • Location: castle bromwich
Re: Boxing thread 2016
« Reply #89 on: February 27, 2016, 11:39:51 PM »
Certainly closer now

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal