collapse collapse

Please donate to help towards the costs of keeping this site going. Thank You.

Recent Topics

Villa Park Redevelopment by Drummond
[Today at 10:46:24 AM]


Emi Martinez by Meanwood Villa
[Today at 09:33:56 AM]


Ollie Watkins by Somniloquism
[Today at 09:30:23 AM]


Ex- Villa Players still playing watch by Clampy
[Today at 09:03:11 AM]


I know none of you care but ........ (the Baseball thread) by Richard E
[Today at 08:38:33 AM]


Youri Tielemans by paul_e
[Today at 07:50:24 AM]


Unai Emery by ChicagoLion
[Today at 07:27:21 AM]


1994 01 29 MOTD Grimsby v Aston Villa by Richard E
[Today at 06:38:10 AM]

Recent Posts

Re: Villa Park Redevelopment by Drummond
[Today at 10:46:24 AM]


Re: Villa Park Redevelopment by itbrvilla
[Today at 10:42:07 AM]


Re: Villa Park Redevelopment by Villan For Life
[Today at 10:19:53 AM]


Re: Villa Park Redevelopment by Pat Mustard
[Today at 10:02:10 AM]


Re: Villa Park Redevelopment by Drummond
[Today at 09:45:33 AM]


Re: Emi Martinez by Meanwood Villa
[Today at 09:33:56 AM]


Re: Ollie Watkins by Somniloquism
[Today at 09:30:23 AM]


Re: Emi Martinez by Dave
[Today at 09:28:31 AM]

Follow us on...

Author Topic: Boxing thread 2016  (Read 52896 times)

Offline dave.woodhall

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 63609
  • Location: Treading water in a sea of retarded sexuality and bad poetry.
Re: Boxing thread 2016
« Reply #75 on: February 27, 2016, 10:49:37 PM »
For pay per view it's been piss poor so far.

You don't need big names, just well-matched fights.

Offline joecrow

  • Member
  • Posts: 277
  • Location: castle bromwich
Re: Boxing thread 2016
« Reply #76 on: February 27, 2016, 10:49:58 PM »
Buffer doesn't look well.
Manchester will do that to you

Offline bertlambshank

  • Member
  • Posts: 11512
  • Location: looking down the barrel of a Smith&Wesson.
  • GM : 30.06.2019
Re: Boxing thread 2016
« Reply #77 on: February 27, 2016, 10:52:31 PM »
He didn't expect that.

Offline bertlambshank

  • Member
  • Posts: 11512
  • Location: looking down the barrel of a Smith&Wesson.
  • GM : 30.06.2019
Re: Boxing thread 2016
« Reply #78 on: February 27, 2016, 10:53:57 PM »
For pay per view it's been piss poor so far.

You don't need big names, just well-matched fights.
Please forward that to Eddie Hearn.

Offline joecrow

  • Member
  • Posts: 277
  • Location: castle bromwich
Re: Boxing thread 2016
« Reply #79 on: February 27, 2016, 11:14:45 PM »
Frampton looking comfortable. Quigg looking nervous.

Offline bertlambshank

  • Member
  • Posts: 11512
  • Location: looking down the barrel of a Smith&Wesson.
  • GM : 30.06.2019
Re: Boxing thread 2016
« Reply #80 on: February 27, 2016, 11:19:26 PM »
Frampton 3 up after 4 for me.

Offline bertlambshank

  • Member
  • Posts: 11512
  • Location: looking down the barrel of a Smith&Wesson.
  • GM : 30.06.2019
Re: Boxing thread 2016
« Reply #81 on: February 27, 2016, 11:23:50 PM »
Make that 4 after 5.

Offline Proposition Joe

  • Member
  • Posts: 4560
  • Location: Munich
Re: Boxing thread 2016
« Reply #82 on: February 27, 2016, 11:25:08 PM »
6 rounds gone, about 5 punches thrown in total.  It's like watching Audley sparring against his reflection.

Offline joecrow

  • Member
  • Posts: 277
  • Location: castle bromwich
Re: Boxing thread 2016
« Reply #83 on: February 27, 2016, 11:27:22 PM »
Frampton up by 5 with 6 gone. Quigg looks lost

Offline bertlambshank

  • Member
  • Posts: 11512
  • Location: looking down the barrel of a Smith&Wesson.
  • GM : 30.06.2019
Re: Boxing thread 2016
« Reply #84 on: February 27, 2016, 11:28:17 PM »
Quigg needs the stoppage already.

Offline dave.woodhall

  • Moderator
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 63609
  • Location: Treading water in a sea of retarded sexuality and bad poetry.
Re: Boxing thread 2016
« Reply #85 on: February 27, 2016, 11:28:58 PM »
That fucking band.

Offline bertlambshank

  • Member
  • Posts: 11512
  • Location: looking down the barrel of a Smith&Wesson.
  • GM : 30.06.2019
Re: Boxing thread 2016
« Reply #86 on: February 27, 2016, 11:31:17 PM »

Offline peter w

  • Member
  • Posts: 35469
  • Location: Istanbul
Re: Boxing thread 2016
« Reply #87 on: February 27, 2016, 11:32:18 PM »
If Quigg doesn't knock Frampton out I think he's getting too far behind here.

Offline tomd2103

  • Member
  • Posts: 15562
Re: Boxing thread 2016
« Reply #88 on: February 27, 2016, 11:32:56 PM »
Frampton up by 5 with 6 gone. Quigg looks lost

Not sure about that.  I think it could be closer than that.

Offline joecrow

  • Member
  • Posts: 277
  • Location: castle bromwich
Re: Boxing thread 2016
« Reply #89 on: February 27, 2016, 11:39:51 PM »
Certainly closer now

 


SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal