Quote from: Risso on January 12, 2016, 11:56:26 AMI could go in and tell you who the shit players are that we need to get rid of. What I want to see from Garde is some managerial ability, and I don't think we've seen much of that yet. What about that 20 minute spell where we played well at Norwich?
I could go in and tell you who the shit players are that we need to get rid of. What I want to see from Garde is some managerial ability, and I don't think we've seen much of that yet.
TV has Garde actually said that Mr "look after number one" Houllier is one of his influences? Serious question. I fucking hope not.
Quote from: Chico Hamilton III on January 12, 2016, 11:58:59 AMQuote from: Risso on January 12, 2016, 11:56:26 AMI could go in and tell you who the shit players are that we need to get rid of. What I want to see from Garde is some managerial ability, and I don't think we've seen much of that yet. What about that 20 minute spell where we played well at Norwich?We were shite at Norwich - Newcastle was reasonable though, probably because they're so appalling.
Quote from: Villa in Denmark on January 12, 2016, 11:49:55 AMQuote from: chrisw1 on January 12, 2016, 10:31:35 AMQuote from: Villa in Denmark on January 12, 2016, 10:17:08 AMQuote from: chrisw1 on January 12, 2016, 09:33:06 AMThere are so many analogies and bullshit theories here.The reality is we just had a legacy of overpaid very average players from MON compounded by a reduced budget and some very average managers. It is just plain wrong to say we haven't tried to address this. The club has tried very hard to root out the overpaid and disruptive (the two aren't necessarily the same) - look at the bomb squad for instance. Misguided, but exactly what someone above has suggested.The fact is, whilst we may say 'sell Gabby for this, Richardson for that' (read in Bent, Ireland, Dunn, Collins, etc etc) other clubs are less keen to take our expensive problems off our hands.I don't buy that it is a 'deep rooted culture' or any of the other hysterical theories. We just have had some shit players, poor managers and not enough money to sort it out.The bomb squad wasn't dealing with it though. It was the equivalent of putting the rubbish behind the shed instead of getting rid of it, then wondering why that end of the garden stinks of shit as everything rots. Then when you finally go to do something about it the bottom falls out of the bin bag and the soggy, smelly, distasteful mess ends up over your feet.Another analogy. Brilliant. It was 'trying' to deal with it. In exactly the same way another poster suggested above. As I stated, it was a misguided approach, but getting rid of dross isn't easy.It was trying to deal with it, the same way that the EU spent 12 months trying to deal with the refugee problem. By kicking the problem as far away as possible, sticking their heads in the sand and hoping it would go away. Guess what? Both got shafted by their own cowardice and ineptitude.Nobody is defending the fucking policy. We all know it did't work.But it's not the same the stupid 'deep rooted culture' theories and ridiculous garden shed analogies.All I'm saying is that the problems are pretty simple when boiled down and all the theories and analogies are pointless at best and hysteria producing counter productive bollocks at worst.
Quote from: chrisw1 on January 12, 2016, 10:31:35 AMQuote from: Villa in Denmark on January 12, 2016, 10:17:08 AMQuote from: chrisw1 on January 12, 2016, 09:33:06 AMThere are so many analogies and bullshit theories here.The reality is we just had a legacy of overpaid very average players from MON compounded by a reduced budget and some very average managers. It is just plain wrong to say we haven't tried to address this. The club has tried very hard to root out the overpaid and disruptive (the two aren't necessarily the same) - look at the bomb squad for instance. Misguided, but exactly what someone above has suggested.The fact is, whilst we may say 'sell Gabby for this, Richardson for that' (read in Bent, Ireland, Dunn, Collins, etc etc) other clubs are less keen to take our expensive problems off our hands.I don't buy that it is a 'deep rooted culture' or any of the other hysterical theories. We just have had some shit players, poor managers and not enough money to sort it out.The bomb squad wasn't dealing with it though. It was the equivalent of putting the rubbish behind the shed instead of getting rid of it, then wondering why that end of the garden stinks of shit as everything rots. Then when you finally go to do something about it the bottom falls out of the bin bag and the soggy, smelly, distasteful mess ends up over your feet.Another analogy. Brilliant. It was 'trying' to deal with it. In exactly the same way another poster suggested above. As I stated, it was a misguided approach, but getting rid of dross isn't easy.It was trying to deal with it, the same way that the EU spent 12 months trying to deal with the refugee problem. By kicking the problem as far away as possible, sticking their heads in the sand and hoping it would go away. Guess what? Both got shafted by their own cowardice and ineptitude.
Quote from: Villa in Denmark on January 12, 2016, 10:17:08 AMQuote from: chrisw1 on January 12, 2016, 09:33:06 AMThere are so many analogies and bullshit theories here.The reality is we just had a legacy of overpaid very average players from MON compounded by a reduced budget and some very average managers. It is just plain wrong to say we haven't tried to address this. The club has tried very hard to root out the overpaid and disruptive (the two aren't necessarily the same) - look at the bomb squad for instance. Misguided, but exactly what someone above has suggested.The fact is, whilst we may say 'sell Gabby for this, Richardson for that' (read in Bent, Ireland, Dunn, Collins, etc etc) other clubs are less keen to take our expensive problems off our hands.I don't buy that it is a 'deep rooted culture' or any of the other hysterical theories. We just have had some shit players, poor managers and not enough money to sort it out.The bomb squad wasn't dealing with it though. It was the equivalent of putting the rubbish behind the shed instead of getting rid of it, then wondering why that end of the garden stinks of shit as everything rots. Then when you finally go to do something about it the bottom falls out of the bin bag and the soggy, smelly, distasteful mess ends up over your feet.Another analogy. Brilliant. It was 'trying' to deal with it. In exactly the same way another poster suggested above. As I stated, it was a misguided approach, but getting rid of dross isn't easy.
Quote from: chrisw1 on January 12, 2016, 09:33:06 AMThere are so many analogies and bullshit theories here.The reality is we just had a legacy of overpaid very average players from MON compounded by a reduced budget and some very average managers. It is just plain wrong to say we haven't tried to address this. The club has tried very hard to root out the overpaid and disruptive (the two aren't necessarily the same) - look at the bomb squad for instance. Misguided, but exactly what someone above has suggested.The fact is, whilst we may say 'sell Gabby for this, Richardson for that' (read in Bent, Ireland, Dunn, Collins, etc etc) other clubs are less keen to take our expensive problems off our hands.I don't buy that it is a 'deep rooted culture' or any of the other hysterical theories. We just have had some shit players, poor managers and not enough money to sort it out.The bomb squad wasn't dealing with it though. It was the equivalent of putting the rubbish behind the shed instead of getting rid of it, then wondering why that end of the garden stinks of shit as everything rots. Then when you finally go to do something about it the bottom falls out of the bin bag and the soggy, smelly, distasteful mess ends up over your feet.
There are so many analogies and bullshit theories here.The reality is we just had a legacy of overpaid very average players from MON compounded by a reduced budget and some very average managers. It is just plain wrong to say we haven't tried to address this. The club has tried very hard to root out the overpaid and disruptive (the two aren't necessarily the same) - look at the bomb squad for instance. Misguided, but exactly what someone above has suggested.The fact is, whilst we may say 'sell Gabby for this, Richardson for that' (read in Bent, Ireland, Dunn, Collins, etc etc) other clubs are less keen to take our expensive problems off our hands.I don't buy that it is a 'deep rooted culture' or any of the other hysterical theories. We just have had some shit players, poor managers and not enough money to sort it out.
Garde seems to be saying that potential new signings are turning us down - sorry haven't got a link as someone just showed me on their 'phone - so we are going to be stuck with the majority of this team until we go down then...
If we beat Palace and Leicester then it might give us hope of signing a few decent players....
Garde has spoken of the close relationship the pair share, which blossomed at the Stade de Gerland and how Houllier's guidance influenced his decision to attempt management in England.Talking to AVTV, Garde said: 'Gerard told me a lot of good, positive things. He encouraged me to take the job. We had a long chat together.'Actually I visited him when he was manager of Aston Villa. So I was not totally lost when I came here to (training centre) Bodymoor Heath.'We liked each other very much. I don't know why - sometimes you can't explain why.'We had a spell together at Lyon and then we never lost contact.'Of course when he spoke to me about Aston Villa it was all positive.
Quote from: Des Little on January 11, 2016, 11:25:02 PMDoes anyone actually expect an honest, open statement from Lerner? It'll be the usual cryptic, noncommittal or motivational shit that it's always been. Nothing to see here.I could not care less about any statement. We have long passed the time when weasel words or marketing flimflam mean anything to anybody with half a clue.On the other hand, I most concerned that he backs his manager in practice by enabling him to do the necessary. Garde must be allowed to wield to wield the scalpel and excise the rotten core.
Does anyone actually expect an honest, open statement from Lerner? It'll be the usual cryptic, noncommittal or motivational shit that it's always been. Nothing to see here.
I agree with Andy Townsend on the behaviour of Lescott and Guzan at Wycombe. How can Lescott claim to be a Villa fan and do what he did?
Quote from: Witton Warrior on January 12, 2016, 12:36:55 PMGarde seems to be saying that potential new signings are turning us down - sorry haven't got a link as someone just showed me on their 'phone - so we are going to be stuck with the majority of this team until we go down then...http://www.skysports.com/transfer-centre7:43AM on the timeline on that link.