Quote from: dave.woodhall on July 20, 2014, 06:37:31 PMQuote from: villan from luton on July 20, 2014, 06:33:12 PMQuote from: pauliewalnuts on July 20, 2014, 06:22:07 PMQuote from: ciggiesnbeer on July 20, 2014, 06:18:08 PMConsidering Mat "I hate Lambert" Kendrick is going on the tour this week (I assume at the clubs expense as usual) then I think we can infer the story about Tayls is bollocks. I dunno about that. Kendrick is the Mail's man, not Villa's. It's different.re Taylor, when he was criticial of the team and manager last season, I was right behind him, glad he'd spoken up and glad he was as pissed off as the rest of us.However, it can't work both ways, can it? If - if - Lambert has said he doesn't want him on the tour, then that's fair enough, the bloke - whilst working for the club - was pretty critical of him last season.It's good to hear the likes of Taylor being as angry and disappointed as the rest of us, but really, it can't work both ways. He's either going to speak freely and be as critical publicly as he wants, or he's going to toe the line as a reflection that he's an employee of the club. It can't be both, that's easy to understand.I like Ian Taylor, he was a decent player, and he was one of us, but I don't think he's a "legend" by any stretch of the imagination, and the whole "you don't treat a legend like that" thing elsewhere is really way, way over the top.And that's assuming he really was asked to stay at home by Lambert, which is probably not true in the first place.That is the point, Ian Taylor was not a great player, but he is 110% Aston Villa. Think it is a major error by Lambert, last season was shite and what is Taylor supposed to say He can say whatever he likes but he can't say it and expect there to be no comebacks. We didn't bleat when Graham Taylor ripped into the club whilst employed.Most of us agreed with the 'time warp' comments by John Gregory.We all knew David James and Gareth Southgate were right.The club is at the edge and unless people within are at last prepared to speak up then we could find ourselves even more in the dark. We have become a joke in the last 5 years so its time we heard the truth.This twat yank and his administration are putting our club in a situation matched only by the mid 1960's and I would encourage whistleblowers within every strata of the club to man up, we need people that care to prove it because this is as fucked up as anything under that old bastard ellis.Fair fucks to Ian Taylor.
Quote from: villan from luton on July 20, 2014, 06:33:12 PMQuote from: pauliewalnuts on July 20, 2014, 06:22:07 PMQuote from: ciggiesnbeer on July 20, 2014, 06:18:08 PMConsidering Mat "I hate Lambert" Kendrick is going on the tour this week (I assume at the clubs expense as usual) then I think we can infer the story about Tayls is bollocks. I dunno about that. Kendrick is the Mail's man, not Villa's. It's different.re Taylor, when he was criticial of the team and manager last season, I was right behind him, glad he'd spoken up and glad he was as pissed off as the rest of us.However, it can't work both ways, can it? If - if - Lambert has said he doesn't want him on the tour, then that's fair enough, the bloke - whilst working for the club - was pretty critical of him last season.It's good to hear the likes of Taylor being as angry and disappointed as the rest of us, but really, it can't work both ways. He's either going to speak freely and be as critical publicly as he wants, or he's going to toe the line as a reflection that he's an employee of the club. It can't be both, that's easy to understand.I like Ian Taylor, he was a decent player, and he was one of us, but I don't think he's a "legend" by any stretch of the imagination, and the whole "you don't treat a legend like that" thing elsewhere is really way, way over the top.And that's assuming he really was asked to stay at home by Lambert, which is probably not true in the first place.That is the point, Ian Taylor was not a great player, but he is 110% Aston Villa. Think it is a major error by Lambert, last season was shite and what is Taylor supposed to say He can say whatever he likes but he can't say it and expect there to be no comebacks.
Quote from: pauliewalnuts on July 20, 2014, 06:22:07 PMQuote from: ciggiesnbeer on July 20, 2014, 06:18:08 PMConsidering Mat "I hate Lambert" Kendrick is going on the tour this week (I assume at the clubs expense as usual) then I think we can infer the story about Tayls is bollocks. I dunno about that. Kendrick is the Mail's man, not Villa's. It's different.re Taylor, when he was criticial of the team and manager last season, I was right behind him, glad he'd spoken up and glad he was as pissed off as the rest of us.However, it can't work both ways, can it? If - if - Lambert has said he doesn't want him on the tour, then that's fair enough, the bloke - whilst working for the club - was pretty critical of him last season.It's good to hear the likes of Taylor being as angry and disappointed as the rest of us, but really, it can't work both ways. He's either going to speak freely and be as critical publicly as he wants, or he's going to toe the line as a reflection that he's an employee of the club. It can't be both, that's easy to understand.I like Ian Taylor, he was a decent player, and he was one of us, but I don't think he's a "legend" by any stretch of the imagination, and the whole "you don't treat a legend like that" thing elsewhere is really way, way over the top.And that's assuming he really was asked to stay at home by Lambert, which is probably not true in the first place.That is the point, Ian Taylor was not a great player, but he is 110% Aston Villa. Think it is a major error by Lambert, last season was shite and what is Taylor supposed to say
Quote from: ciggiesnbeer on July 20, 2014, 06:18:08 PMConsidering Mat "I hate Lambert" Kendrick is going on the tour this week (I assume at the clubs expense as usual) then I think we can infer the story about Tayls is bollocks. I dunno about that. Kendrick is the Mail's man, not Villa's. It's different.re Taylor, when he was criticial of the team and manager last season, I was right behind him, glad he'd spoken up and glad he was as pissed off as the rest of us.However, it can't work both ways, can it? If - if - Lambert has said he doesn't want him on the tour, then that's fair enough, the bloke - whilst working for the club - was pretty critical of him last season.It's good to hear the likes of Taylor being as angry and disappointed as the rest of us, but really, it can't work both ways. He's either going to speak freely and be as critical publicly as he wants, or he's going to toe the line as a reflection that he's an employee of the club. It can't be both, that's easy to understand.I like Ian Taylor, he was a decent player, and he was one of us, but I don't think he's a "legend" by any stretch of the imagination, and the whole "you don't treat a legend like that" thing elsewhere is really way, way over the top.And that's assuming he really was asked to stay at home by Lambert, which is probably not true in the first place.
Considering Mat "I hate Lambert" Kendrick is going on the tour this week (I assume at the clubs expense as usual) then I think we can infer the story about Tayls is bollocks.
Quote from: Holte L2 on July 20, 2014, 11:47:12 PMQuote from: dave.woodhall on July 20, 2014, 06:37:31 PMQuote from: villan from luton on July 20, 2014, 06:33:12 PMQuote from: pauliewalnuts on July 20, 2014, 06:22:07 PMQuote from: ciggiesnbeer on July 20, 2014, 06:18:08 PMConsidering Mat "I hate Lambert" Kendrick is going on the tour this week (I assume at the clubs expense as usual) then I think we can infer the story about Tayls is bollocks. I dunno about that. Kendrick is the Mail's man, not Villa's. It's different.re Taylor, when he was criticial of the team and manager last season, I was right behind him, glad he'd spoken up and glad he was as pissed off as the rest of us.However, it can't work both ways, can it? If - if - Lambert has said he doesn't want him on the tour, then that's fair enough, the bloke - whilst working for the club - was pretty critical of him last season.It's good to hear the likes of Taylor being as angry and disappointed as the rest of us, but really, it can't work both ways. He's either going to speak freely and be as critical publicly as he wants, or he's going to toe the line as a reflection that he's an employee of the club. It can't be both, that's easy to understand.I like Ian Taylor, he was a decent player, and he was one of us, but I don't think he's a "legend" by any stretch of the imagination, and the whole "you don't treat a legend like that" thing elsewhere is really way, way over the top.And that's assuming he really was asked to stay at home by Lambert, which is probably not true in the first place.That is the point, Ian Taylor was not a great player, but he is 110% Aston Villa. Think it is a major error by Lambert, last season was shite and what is Taylor supposed to say He can say whatever he likes but he can't say it and expect there to be no comebacks. We didn't bleat when Graham Taylor ripped into the club whilst employed.Most of us agreed with the 'time warp' comments by John Gregory.We all knew David James and Gareth Southgate were right.The club is at the edge and unless people within are at last prepared to speak up then we could find ourselves even more in the dark. We have become a joke in the last 5 years so its time we heard the truth.This twat yank and his administration are putting our club in a situation matched only by the mid 1960's and I would encourage whistleblowers within every strata of the club to man up, we need people that care to prove it because this is as fucked up as anything under that old bastard ellis.Fair fucks to Ian Taylor.The thing is, it's possible to agree with what you say about the current administration - and I do, more or less - whilst still not being surprised by Taylor being left off the tour.Yes, fair do's to him for being so honest.I admire him for it.However, at the same time, I am not even remotely surprised if it is true Lambert wanted him off the tour. I don't blame him for a second. For his preparations for the season, he'd have around the camp someone who has made it clear how much he is in disagreement with his methods.Taylor has every right to say he is unhappy with the way things are going - which Villa fan wouldn't be? - but he can not then expect to proceed as an employee of the club as if nothing has happened.
What difference does it make if he wanted to continue under the current regime?If this is true, he's criticised the club which employs him. That's the key to it.
Quote from: old man villa fan on July 20, 2014, 11:43:13 PMSo what is the role of an ambassador. Criticising the club doesn't fall under the job description I would have thought, unless that is what the club want to put out.And there you go, OMVF, the best description of the issue we've seen today. That's exactly it.
So what is the role of an ambassador. Criticising the club doesn't fall under the job description I would have thought, unless that is what the club want to put out.
Quote from: pauliewalnuts on July 20, 2014, 11:44:02 PMQuote from: old man villa fan on July 20, 2014, 11:43:13 PMSo what is the role of an ambassador. Criticising the club doesn't fall under the job description I would have thought, unless that is what the club want to put out.And there you go, OMVF, the best description of the issue we've seen today. That's exactly it.Where are these tweets of Taylor criticising the club ?