Quote from: eastie on January 05, 2014, 07:35:37 PMI found Oldham away a real downer I think it was 89/90 when we finished runners up - I thought it could be our cup year but we rolled over 3-0 Welcome gaza .That was a bad game, midweeker I recall ? Horrible plastic pitch and we just never got going. Left on about 70 mins got back to the car to find we'd been blocked in and couldn't move. Listened glumly to rest of game on the car radio :-(
I found Oldham away a real downer I think it was 89/90 when we finished runners up - I thought it could be our cup year but we rolled over 3-0 Welcome gaza .
O.K, if there was sycophancy, who was being sycophantic? Maybe it happened, but I don't recall it. I do recall some of the abuse he took, which was pretty lame in my opinion. The bottom line is, he didn't deserve it, regardless of your opinion of his worth on the forums. I found some of it embarrassing. Anyway, ancient history now. I'll remember the novelty with fondness at least.
GK, nothing but the best response yet again. I don't know why we bother with all of the various threads on this site, we just need to communicate with you.You simply do not have enough time to devote to your other ventures and keep Mrs K happy, you need to be an interactive answer system for us on here !Thanks again
Quote from: The Left Side on January 05, 2014, 07:45:08 PMagree, terrible defending and Benteke should have buried the first half header... nice to see Helenius get a goal, he took it well. Benteke has probably been coached to head the ball downwards and this is a flaw in football coaching, in my view. There are times for that but the Swansea player this afternoon showed how it should be done.
agree, terrible defending and Benteke should have buried the first half header... nice to see Helenius get a goal, he took it well.
Quote from: bertlambshank on January 05, 2014, 03:09:33 PMThe General was full of shit towards the end.Anybody remember when TSM was appointed,top 4/5 with the right backing,both of those are still floating in the wind.i think that's very harsh. He was doing what he thought he needed to do. To say he was full of shit is unreasonable, in my opinion.As for defending the McLeish appointment, well, really, that was a state of affairs so ridiculously surreal, I don't think there's a person on the planet who could have come up with a satisfactory bit of logic to explain that.
The General was full of shit towards the end.Anybody remember when TSM was appointed,top 4/5 with the right backing,both of those are still floating in the wind.
Quote from: Dave Clark Five on January 05, 2014, 08:13:30 PMQuote from: The Left Side on January 05, 2014, 07:45:08 PMagree, terrible defending and Benteke should have buried the first half header... nice to see Helenius get a goal, he took it well. Benteke has probably been coached to head the ball downwards and this is a flaw in football coaching, in my view. There are times for that but the Swansea player this afternoon showed how it should be done.Me too - I was coached that forwards head down and defenders head up.
Quote from: Mazrim on January 05, 2014, 08:02:04 PMO.K, if there was sycophancy, who was being sycophantic? Maybe it happened, but I don't recall it. I do recall some of the abuse he took, which was pretty lame in my opinion. The bottom line is, he didn't deserve it, regardless of your opinion of his worth on the forums. I found some of it embarrassing. Anyway, ancient history now. I'll remember the novelty with fondness at least.Yes, I would agree he didn't deserve the abuse, of course not, but the sycophancy and the abuse are two separate issues. There isn't much relevance of the one to the other.As for who was being sycophantic, we mean this sort of thing.I've taken out the poster's name (although he doesn't post here any more), but i searched his name and the word Krulak, and this is the first result.QuoteGK, nothing but the best response yet again. I don't know why we bother with all of the various threads on this site, we just need to communicate with you.You simply do not have enough time to devote to your other ventures and keep Mrs K happy, you need to be an interactive answer system for us on here !Thanks again
Quote from: silhillvilla on January 05, 2014, 08:32:42 PMQuote from: eastie on January 05, 2014, 07:35:37 PMI found Oldham away a real downer I think it was 89/90 when we finished runners up - I thought it could be our cup year but we rolled over 3-0 Welcome gaza .That was a bad game, midweeker I recall ? Horrible plastic pitch and we just never got going. Left on about 70 mins got back to the car to find we'd been blocked in and couldn't move. Listened glumly to rest of game on the car radio :-( I remember going there in the 87-8 season, and thinking it was entirely possible that I would never, ever be as cold as that at a football match again for the rest of my life.
Quote from: pauliewalnuts on January 05, 2014, 09:11:56 PMQuote from: silhillvilla on January 05, 2014, 08:32:42 PMQuote from: eastie on January 05, 2014, 07:35:37 PMI found Oldham away a real downer I think it was 89/90 when we finished runners up - I thought it could be our cup year but we rolled over 3-0 Welcome gaza .That was a bad game, midweeker I recall ? Horrible plastic pitch and we just never got going. Left on about 70 mins got back to the car to find we'd been blocked in and couldn't move. Listened glumly to rest of game on the car radio :-( I remember going there in the 87-8 season, and thinking it was entirely possible that I would never, ever be as cold as that at a football match again for the rest of my life.Oldham 1990 was a downer, as was Liverpool two years later. I really thought we would beat them. But the biggest downer for me was Charlton '87. Forget Sheffield Wednesday, Charlton was the day we got relegated for me. Huddersfield '87 is the wettest I have ever been at a game. A midweek goalless draw at Notts County in the BFR years was the coldest I have been.
Quote from: pauliewalnuts on January 05, 2014, 09:09:08 PMQuote from: Mazrim on January 05, 2014, 08:02:04 PMO.K, if there was sycophancy, who was being sycophantic? Maybe it happened, but I don't recall it. I do recall some of the abuse he took, which was pretty lame in my opinion. The bottom line is, he didn't deserve it, regardless of your opinion of his worth on the forums. I found some of it embarrassing. Anyway, ancient history now. I'll remember the novelty with fondness at least.Yes, I would agree he didn't deserve the abuse, of course not, but the sycophancy and the abuse are two separate issues. There isn't much relevance of the one to the other.As for who was being sycophantic, we mean this sort of thing.I've taken out the poster's name (although he doesn't post here any more), but i searched his name and the word Krulak, and this is the first result.QuoteGK, nothing but the best response yet again. I don't know why we bother with all of the various threads on this site, we just need to communicate with you.You simply do not have enough time to devote to your other ventures and keep Mrs K happy, you need to be an interactive answer system for us on here !Thanks againI don't know what this proves other than there was a poster who posted a crass load of bollox and I'm sure that there will be other examples that are not unique to the General's thread. I assume that there are just as many other posts on that thread that were simply being argumentative, disrespectful or downright provocative, posted by someone with an axe to grind, about something that he was unable to deal with (be those for business reasons or football reasons).From my perspective, the thread was a unique opportunity to have access to someone with real influence. Unfortunately it degenerated into posters wanting answers that he was either unable, reluctant or unwilling to give. I don't think that he was here for people to chuck shit at whenever they had their arse in their hands over something. I thought at the time, that (without any need for being sycophantic) the lack of common decency that he was afforded was piss poor from certain quarters.