Quote from: ChicagoLion on December 19, 2013, 03:58:57 AMMany of his signings have been awful.Young players bought cheaply are generally a gamble, some come off, some don't.
Many of his signings have been awful.
Quote from: old man villa fan on December 19, 2013, 04:54:14 AMQuote from: ChicagoLion on December 19, 2013, 03:58:57 AMMany of his signings have been awful.Young players bought cheaply are generally a gamble, some come off, some don't.And at least we're not wasting £8m-£10m on average players anymore which are costing us a fortune in wages.
Quote from: Clampy on December 19, 2013, 09:16:51 AMQuote from: old man villa fan on December 19, 2013, 04:54:14 AMQuote from: ChicagoLion on December 19, 2013, 03:58:57 AMMany of his signings have been awful.Young players bought cheaply are generally a gamble, some come off, some don't.And at least we're not wasting £8m-£10m on average players anymore which are costing us a fortune in wages.And most of these are young enough that they can still improve.Look how much stick Ron Vlaar got last season - i'll never understand why people are so quick to write off our players.
Kozak at £7mill is hardly cheap when we already had Benteke, Helenius, Bowery, Gabby and Weimann.
Quote from: bobdylan on December 19, 2013, 09:33:23 AMKozak at £7mill is hardly cheap when we already had Benteke, Helenius, Bowery, Gabby and Weimann.Kozak will prove a bargain in my opinion although I take your point that we had plenty of strikers and maybe there were more urgent priorities in the squad .I don't think anyone could have expected to get to Xmas with Weimann and gabby only having one goal each in the league.
The key thing with Kozak is that everyone seems to think that if we hadn't signed him we could've got an attacking midfielder instead but I don't see any evidence to suggest that would've happened. As far as I'm concerned we didn't find the midfielder we wanted for a price we were willing to pay and then, in an unrelated event, a striker that Lambert was very interested in became available late in the window and the board backed him to get his man. If the midfielder had been available I think we'd have got both.
Quote from: paul_e on December 19, 2013, 03:00:12 PMThe key thing with Kozak is that everyone seems to think that if we hadn't signed him we could've got an attacking midfielder instead but I don't see any evidence to suggest that would've happened. As far as I'm concerned we didn't find the midfielder we wanted for a price we were willing to pay and then, in an unrelated event, a striker that Lambert was very interested in became available late in the window and the board backed him to get his man. If the midfielder had been available I think we'd have got both.This seems to be too abstract a concept for people to grasp.
I don't expect us to be particularly good. But I do want us to be watchable. Like the end of last season. Which is why I was so concerned by the signing of Kozak. You just don't sign a 6'5" lump if you are intent on playing like Arsenal.
Quote from: Tuco Salamanca on December 19, 2013, 03:17:41 PMI don't expect us to be particularly good. But I do want us to be watchable. Like the end of last season. Which is why I was so concerned by the signing of Kozak. You just don't sign a 6'5" lump if you are intent on playing like Arsenal. Don't Arsenal have two recognised strikers on their books, one of whom is 6'5" and the other of whom is 6'4"?