and in terms of goalscoring he's largely been vindicated in that. However losing a player who was one of the best strikers in europe to injury and/or bad form would harm pretty much any team unless someone else steps up and plays beyond expectations for a while. The issue is Gabby and Weimann have both had niggles and struggled to have an impact as well.
Very simplistic, we all know that it can take players months to adapt to English football and so to expect him to step straight in and perform is unrealistic.Injuries have killed us really, as we've had no consistency in election and new signings have had had little time to acclimatise. I know all sides have them but we have been particularly unfortunate this season.
Quote from: Charlie8182 on December 22, 2013, 09:34:47 PMQuote from: BoskoDjembaSalifou on December 22, 2013, 01:20:15 PMQuote from: paul_e on December 22, 2013, 01:13:17 PMLambert went for the youth option, getting rid of a bunch of the older players and then intending to use the rest whilst the youngsters got up to speed. Unfortunately those senior players let us down again and it was the kids who kept us in the league.I think they went down that route as it's cheaper than buying proper first team players. This "young and hungry" thing is just a clever way of saying we're doing things on the cheap.Since when was it necessary to add the word 'hungry' into the equation, its as if the young players which have been brought in are somehow hungrier than other young players who play for other clubs; its total bullsh*t.See: Warnock, Stephen; Dunne, Richard; Collins, James; Ireland, Stephen vol. I-XX.
Quote from: BoskoDjembaSalifou on December 22, 2013, 01:20:15 PMQuote from: paul_e on December 22, 2013, 01:13:17 PMLambert went for the youth option, getting rid of a bunch of the older players and then intending to use the rest whilst the youngsters got up to speed. Unfortunately those senior players let us down again and it was the kids who kept us in the league.I think they went down that route as it's cheaper than buying proper first team players. This "young and hungry" thing is just a clever way of saying we're doing things on the cheap.Since when was it necessary to add the word 'hungry' into the equation, its as if the young players which have been brought in are somehow hungrier than other young players who play for other clubs; its total bullsh*t.
Quote from: paul_e on December 22, 2013, 01:13:17 PMLambert went for the youth option, getting rid of a bunch of the older players and then intending to use the rest whilst the youngsters got up to speed. Unfortunately those senior players let us down again and it was the kids who kept us in the league.I think they went down that route as it's cheaper than buying proper first team players. This "young and hungry" thing is just a clever way of saying we're doing things on the cheap.
Lambert went for the youth option, getting rid of a bunch of the older players and then intending to use the rest whilst the youngsters got up to speed. Unfortunately those senior players let us down again and it was the kids who kept us in the league.
Quote from: Montbert on December 22, 2013, 11:10:39 PMQuote from: Charlie8182 on December 22, 2013, 09:34:47 PMQuote from: BoskoDjembaSalifou on December 22, 2013, 01:20:15 PMQuote from: paul_e on December 22, 2013, 01:13:17 PMLambert went for the youth option, getting rid of a bunch of the older players and then intending to use the rest whilst the youngsters got up to speed. Unfortunately those senior players let us down again and it was the kids who kept us in the league.I think they went down that route as it's cheaper than buying proper first team players. This "young and hungry" thing is just a clever way of saying we're doing things on the cheap.Since when was it necessary to add the word 'hungry' into the equation, its as if the young players which have been brought in are somehow hungrier than other young players who play for other clubs; its total bullsh*t.See: Warnock, Stephen; Dunne, Richard; Collins, James; Ireland, Stephen vol. I-XX.All of whom - except Ireland - were good for us in the season in which they signed. Subsequent managers didn't get anything out of them.
It's not just injuries at all, coaching plays a massive part in it. We don't appear to have a clue how to move off the ball and create space and I know that's been the case for a long time but it's just ridiculous.
Wigan had players like Boyce playing nice football and hardly spent alot either so certainly there is a case to say the coaching isn't up to scratch.
Quote from: ChicagoLion on December 22, 2013, 05:13:59 PMQuote from: TonyD on December 22, 2013, 04:34:02 PMQuote from: eastie on December 22, 2013, 11:17:55 AMQuote from: TonyD on December 22, 2013, 11:09:36 AMLose the next two games and he wil go. I can't see him going if we lost the next 5 to be honest , I would dispense with his services if we did lose the next 2 home games but I really can't see randy lerner sacking him I want him to stay but no points from the next two games at home could bring change. Lets face it if that happens he should be sacked.If he lost the next 2, even in the pro keeping him stable, with Sunderland away, Arsenal home and Liverpool away the next 3, it would be really bleak. It would also end the argument that despite performances we have improved points wise, as 4 points from those 2 home games would give us a cushion on last seasons tally to the tune of about 5. As much as I like him, lose them both and I could totally understand the chairman pulling the trigger. It would be 5 straight defeats, 4 of which you would have expected us to compete for points in and United in their worst state for 20 years.
Quote from: TonyD on December 22, 2013, 04:34:02 PMQuote from: eastie on December 22, 2013, 11:17:55 AMQuote from: TonyD on December 22, 2013, 11:09:36 AMLose the next two games and he wil go. I can't see him going if we lost the next 5 to be honest , I would dispense with his services if we did lose the next 2 home games but I really can't see randy lerner sacking him I want him to stay but no points from the next two games at home could bring change. Lets face it if that happens he should be sacked.
Quote from: eastie on December 22, 2013, 11:17:55 AMQuote from: TonyD on December 22, 2013, 11:09:36 AMLose the next two games and he wil go. I can't see him going if we lost the next 5 to be honest , I would dispense with his services if we did lose the next 2 home games but I really can't see randy lerner sacking him I want him to stay but no points from the next two games at home could bring change.
Quote from: TonyD on December 22, 2013, 11:09:36 AMLose the next two games and he wil go. I can't see him going if we lost the next 5 to be honest , I would dispense with his services if we did lose the next 2 home games but I really can't see randy lerner sacking him
Lose the next two games and he wil go.
Quote from: David_Nab on December 23, 2013, 02:16:59 PMWigan had players like Boyce playing nice football and hardly spent alot either so certainly there is a case to say the coaching isn't up to scratch.This is much more my concern. Martinez, Rodgers, even Adkins and definitely Pochettino all get their teams to play passing football, and presumably that's down to a lot of obsessive training. I don't know what we do in training sessions, but I'm guessing it isn't the same as those teams.
Quote from: Montbert on December 23, 2013, 04:10:10 PMQuote from: David_Nab on December 23, 2013, 02:16:59 PMWigan had players like Boyce playing nice football and hardly spent alot either so certainly there is a case to say the coaching isn't up to scratch.This is much more my concern. Martinez, Rodgers, even Adkins and definitely Pochettino all get their teams to play passing football, and presumably that's down to a lot of obsessive training. I don't know what we do in training sessions, but I'm guessing it isn't the same as those teams.Lambert can have us play like that. He did last season I fondly remember the "We are Aston Villa, we are passing the ball!" chant at West Ham.He is a very changeable manager, I expect us to go through a phase of playing a possession style game again this season.
Quote from: PaulWinch again on December 23, 2013, 03:33:05 PMIt's not just injuries at all, coaching plays a massive part in it. We don't appear to have a clue how to move off the ball and create space and I know that's been the case for a long time but it's just ridiculous.But don't you think there were spells at the back end of last season where - for the first time since God knows when, possibly O'Leary's first season - we actually did start to pass the ball properly, and move off it, and play in triangles, and actually look like pleasing on the eye when in possession (rather than when breaking)?That's my most disappointing thing this season. I know we're not going to be anywhere near the top eight, but I thought I'd enjoy watching us this season. I really haven't.I read an apposite comment recently that even when we've won this season, it's almost happened by accident. It certainly felt like that against Southampton and Citeh.