It looks like Dunne is the latest player whose reputation is starting to benefit from not being in the team. To call him 'one of the best when in form' would put him alongside the likes of Vidic or Komapny. He is well short of that.Alongside his mistakes, he also has the cross to bear of being one of O'Neill's signature signings. Competent I guess, but what an opportunity wasted for the money he cost. He is now one of the decreasing number in the current squad that represents a time better left behind us.In truth, he was past his sell-by date as a player and as a professional before we even bought him.Who knows what Lambert thinks, but I'd rate him 4th choice centre back right now.
Quote from: Steve Rose on September 06, 2012, 03:01:10 AMIt looks like Dunne is the latest player whose reputation is starting to benefit from not being in the team. To call him 'one of the best when in form' would put him alongside the likes of Vidic or Komapny. He is well short of that.Alongside his mistakes, he also has the cross to bear of being one of O'Neill's signature signings. Competent I guess, but what an opportunity wasted for the money he cost. He is now one of the decreasing number in the current squad that represents a time better left behind us.In truth, he was past his sell-by date as a player and as a professional before we even bought him.Who knows what Lambert thinks, but I'd rate him 4th choice centre back right now.I's say it's far more fashionable to slag Dunne off actually. 'Fat' etc. As Nick Harper says, he's a quality player who will get back in the team ahead of Clark at centre half. If he's focused I'd say he'll be there all season. He's been one part brilliant for us and one part average, so I think the slagging he gets sometimes is unwarranted - maybe it is something to do with him being a MON signing though, who knows?
He was finished for me after the 'team bonding' incident and I would much prefer to go with Vlaar plus Clark or Baker as I believe they will better play the PL way
Quote from: eastie on September 03, 2012, 08:20:45 PMQuote from: The Villa Werewolf on September 03, 2012, 08:17:08 PMIs there really any need for that dig in the thread title? Quite pathetic.It's not as if he's respected his condition in the past is it? Pissed up on a club trip & abusing younger players, clearly overweight, when he starts respecting himself & his responsibilities I'm sure others will follow suit.
Quote from: The Villa Werewolf on September 03, 2012, 08:17:08 PMIs there really any need for that dig in the thread title? Quite pathetic.
Is there really any need for that dig in the thread title? Quite pathetic.
Quote from: Rigadon on September 07, 2012, 06:43:57 AMQuote from: Steve Rose on September 06, 2012, 03:01:10 AMIt looks like Dunne is the latest player whose reputation is starting to benefit from not being in the team. To call him 'one of the best when in form' would put him alongside the likes of Vidic or Komapny. He is well short of that.Alongside his mistakes, he also has the cross to bear of being one of O'Neill's signature signings. Competent I guess, but what an opportunity wasted for the money he cost. He is now one of the decreasing number in the current squad that represents a time better left behind us.In truth, he was past his sell-by date as a player and as a professional before we even bought him.Who knows what Lambert thinks, but I'd rate him 4th choice centre back right now.I's say it's far more fashionable to slag Dunne off actually. 'Fat' etc. As Nick Harper says, he's a quality player who will get back in the team ahead of Clark at centre half. If he's focused I'd say he'll be there all season. He's been one part brilliant for us and one part average, so I think the slagging he gets sometimes is unwarranted - maybe it is something to do with him being a MON signing though, who knows? For me I don't care who signed him or who he played for, I don't recall ever calling him fat (unfit i have said). He is what he is, a guy with the potential to be a very good central defender but with flaws which have always stopped him reaching his peak. Given his disciplinary issues at the club (I don't care who the manager is or how many other people they've fallen out with, you don't get pissed and abuse a club legend on a trip designed to improve morale) and his ongoing fitness problems I don't think he adds enough beyond Baker or Clark to justify being picked ahead of them.
Quote from: Rigadon on September 07, 2012, 06:43:57 AMQuote from: Steve Rose on September 06, 2012, 03:01:10 AMIt looks like Dunne is the latest player whose reputation is starting to benefit from not being in the team. To call him 'one of the best when in form' would put him alongside the likes of Vidic or Komapny. He is well short of that.Alongside his mistakes, he also has the cross to bear of being one of O'Neill's signature signings. Competent I guess, but what an opportunity wasted for the money he cost. He is now one of the decreasing number in the current squad that represents a time better left behind us.In truth, he was past his sell-by date as a player and as a professional before we even bought him.Who knows what Lambert thinks, but I'd rate him 4th choice centre back right now.I's say it's far more fashionable to slag Dunne off actually. 'Fat' etc. As Nick Harper says, he's a quality player who will get back in the team ahead of Clark at centre half. If he's focused I'd say he'll be there all season. He's been one part brilliant for us and one part average, so I think the slagging he gets sometimes is unwarranted - maybe it is something to do with him being a MON signing though, who knows? He's been one part good and two parts terrible in my book.He's rash, lacks concentration and there's been talk of his eating and drinking issues since Everton fucked him off as a kid.He's on the way down, and is not good enough to warrant giving a shirt ahead of Baker or Clark.Use only in case of emergency.
We all get a bit dewy eyed about Clark because he's come through the youth team and has some potential, but he lacks pace and strength at centre half.